Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Riots, Demonstrations, Strikes and the Coalition Programme

  • Peter Taylor-Gooby (a1)
Abstract

The current UK government's policies include headlong spending cuts and a far-reaching restructuring of public provision. State welfare arguably contributes to political legitimacy and social stability, as well as to better social conditions and economic prosperity. The fact that current policies bear disproportionately on lower income groups may damage legitimacy.

This article analyses a dataset covering twenty-six countries for more than two decades to show that spending cuts, privatisation and increases in poverty undermine legitimacy. It uses a direct measure of legitimacy in terms of the frequency of riots and political demonstrations and strikes, rather than the usual indirect measures in terms of attitudes and trust in government. Findings in relation to the increased work-centredness of the benefit and labour market reforms are more equivocal: a stricter benefit regime may not undermine legitimacy.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

I. Gough (1979) The Political Economy of the Welfare State, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

F. Lyon and L. Sepulveda (2009), ‘Mapping social enterprises: past approaches, challenges and future directions’, Social Enterprise Journal, 5, 1, 8394.

C. Morrison , J. D. Lafay and S. Dessus (1994) ‘Adjustment programmes and politico-economic interactions in developing countries: lessons from an empirical analysis of Africa in the 1980s’, in G. A. Cornia and G. K. Helleiner (eds.), From Adjustment to Development in Africa: Conflict, Controversy, Convergence, Consensus?, London: Royal African Society.

P. Norris (2008) Driving Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

A. Park , E. Clery , J. Curtice , M. Phillips and D. Utting (2012) British Social Attitudes, the 28th Report, London: NatCen/Sage.

P. Pierson (ed.) (2001) The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

B. Rothstein (2005) Social Traps and the Problem of Trust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

S. Svallfors (2011) ‘A bedrock of support?’, Social Policy and Administration, 45, 7, 806–25.

P. Taylor-Gooby (2012) ‘Root and branch restructuring to achieve major cuts’, Social Policy and Administration, 46, 1, 6182.

P. Taylor-Gooby and R. Martin (2010) ‘Fairness, equality and legitimacy: a qualitative comparative study of Germany and the UK’, Social Policy and Administration, 44, 1, 85103.

P. Taylor-Gooby and G. Stoker (2011) ‘The Coalition Programme’, Political Quarterly, 82, 1, 415.

W van Oorschott . (2000) ‘Who should get what, and why?’, Policy and Politics, 28, 1, 3348.

W van Oorschott . (2006) ‘Making the difference in social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16, 1, 2342.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Social Policy and Society
  • ISSN: 1474-7464
  • EISSN: 1475-3073
  • URL: /core/journals/social-policy-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 10
Total number of PDF views: 60 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 187 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 29th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.