Skip to main content

Walking the Walk: Changing Familial Forms, Government Policy and Everyday Social Work Practice in England

  • Julie Walsh (a1) and Will Mason (a2)

Although contemporary sociological thought reports a diversification of family forms in society, ‘the family’ continues to influence national and international political agendas. Social workers, as ‘street level bureaucrats’, are social agents that both work with citizens and implement policies made by senior officials. Despite this, the extent to which conceptual and policy developments in family diversity manifest in family-based social work practice remains under explored. This article brings together the findings of two comparative studies, and explores the transfer of conceptual understandings of family, and policy, in England, through two examples: gendered caring expectations and culturally located familial norms. Significantly, we show that, when prompted, social workers recognise family complexity and diversity, but myriad constraints complicate the application of these understandings, and related policies. Bringing together literature from sociology, social policy and social work, this article, thereby, offers a unique lens and highlights a lag between conceptual developments, policy and implementation.

Hide All
Aronson, J. (1995) ‘A pragmatic view of thematic analysis’, The Qualitative Report, 2, 1, 13.
Beck, U. and Beck-Germshein, E. (1993) Individualisation, London: Sage.
Ben-Ari, A. and Strier, R. E. (2010) ‘Rethinking cultural competence: what can we learn from Levinas?British Journal of Social Work, 7, 1, 2155–67.
Bhambra, G. (2017) ‘Brexit, commonwealth and exclusionary citizenship’, Open Democracy, [accessed 11.12.2017].
Boccagni, P. (2015) ‘(Super)diversity and the migration–social work nexus: a new lens on the field of access and inclusion?’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38, 4, 608–20.
Brotherton, G. (2016) ‘How migration and radicalisation are making British social work global’, Community Care, [accessed 09.12.2017].
Bywaters, P., Brady, G., Bunting, L., Daniel, B., Featherstone, B., Jones, C., Morris, K., Scourfield, J., Sparks, T. and Webb, C. (2017) ‘Inequalities in English child protection practice under austerity: a universal challenge?’, Child and Family Social Work, 23, 1, 5361.
Cheal, D. (2008) Families in Today's World, UK: Routledge.
Act, Children (1989) [accessed 15.05.2018].
Department for Education (DfE) (2015) ‘Working Together to Safeguard Children , London: DfE.
Department of Health (DoH) (2007) Maternity Matters, London: DoH, [accessed 30.05.2018].
Dominelli, L. (2018) Anti-Racist Social Work, 4th edn, London: Palgrave.
Doucet, A. (2006) ‘Estrogen filled worlds’: fathers as primary caregivers and embodiment’, The Sociological Review, 54,4, 696716.
Doucet, A. (2009) ‘Dad and baby in the first year: gendered responsibilities and embodiment’, Political and Social Science, 624, 1, 7898.
Erikksen, M. and Hester, M. (2001) ‘Violent men as good enough fathers? A look at England and Sweden’, Violence against Women, 7, 7, 779–98.
Favell, A. (2008) ‘The new face of East-West migration in Europe’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration and Studies, 34, 5, 701–16.
Featherstone, B. (2014) ‘Working with fathers: risk or resource?’, in Ribbens Mccarthy, J., Hooper, C. and Gillies, V. (eds.), Family Troubles?: Exploring Changes and Challenges in the Family Lives of Children and Young People, Bristol: Policy Press, 315–26.
Featherstone, B. and Packover, S. (2007) ‘Letting them get away with it: fathers, domestic violence and child welfare’, Critical Social Policy, 27, 2, 181202.
Featherstone, B., White, S. and Morris, K. (2014) Reimagining Child Protection, UK: Polity Press.
Finch, J. (2007) ‘Displaying families’, Sociology, 41, 1, 6581.
Finch, J. and Mason, J. (2000) Passing on: Kinship and Inheritance in England, Oxon: Routledge.
Furlong, M. and Wight, J. (2011) ‘Promoting “critical awareness” and critiquing “cultural competence”: towards disrupting received professional knowledge’, Australian Social Work, 64, 1, 3854.
Gabb, J. (2010) Researching Intimacy in Families, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gambrill, E. (2008) Decision making in child welfare: constraints and potentials’, in Lindsey, D. and Shlonsky, A. (eds.), Child Welfare Research: Advances for Practice and Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Giddens, A. (1992) The Transformation of Intimacy, UK: Wiley.
Gillies, V. (2011) ‘From function to competence: engaging with the new politics of family’, Sociological Research Online, 16, 4. (2017) ‘ Housing benefit’, [accessed 11.12.2017].
Hantrais (2004) Family Policy Matters: Responding to Family Change in Europe, Bristol: Polity Press.
Harrison, G. and Turner, R. (2011) ’Being a “culturally competent” social worker’, British Journal of Social Work, 41, 333–50.
Heath, S., McGhee, D. and Trevena, T, (2011) ‘Lost in transnationalism’, Sociological Research Online, 16, 4.
Jamieson, L. (1997) Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jarrett, T. (2017) Children: parental responsibility – what is it and how is it gained and lost (England and Wales), Briefing Paper No. 2827, House of Commons Library, [accessed 05.03.2018].
Kilkey, M., Plomien, A. and Perrons, D. (2014) ‘Migrant men's fathering narrative, practices and projects in national and transnational spaces: recent polish male migrants in London’, International Migration, 52, 1, 178–91.
Kohli, H. K., Huber, R. and Faul, A. C. (2010) ‘Historical and theoretical development of culturally competent social work practice’, Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 30, 3, 252–71.
Laird, S., Morris, K., Archard, P. and Clawson, R. (2016) ‘Working with the whole family: what case files tell us about social work practices’, Child and Family Social Work, 22, 1, 1322–9.
Lamy, D. (2003) The Victoria Climbe Enquiry, London: HMSO.
Lewis, C. and Lamb, M. E. (2007) ‘Understanding fatherhood: a review of recent research’, Lancaster: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Lewis, J. (2001) ‘The decline of the male breadwinner model’, Social Politics, 8, 2, 152–69.
Lipsky, M. (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service, New York: The Russell Sage Foundation.
Mason, W., Mirza, N. and Webb, C. (2018) ‘Using the framework to analyse mixed methods case studies’, Sage Research Methods Cases, Part 2.
Mason, W., Morris, K., Webb, C., Daniels, B., Featherstone, B., Bywaters, P., Mirza, N., Hooper, J., Brady, G., Bunting, L. and Scourfield, J. (forthcoming) ‘Investigating child welfare inequalities: the use of mixed methods case studies’, Journal of Mixed Methods Research.
Morgan, D. (1996) Family Connections: An Introduction to Family Studies, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Morris, K., White, S., Doherty, P. and Warwick, L. (2015) ‘Out of time: theorizing family in social work practice’, Child and Family Social Work, 22, 3, 5160.
Nordquist, P. and Smart, C. (2014) Relative Strangers, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Nygren, L., White, S. and Ellingsen, I. (2018) ‘Investigating welfare regime typologies: paradoxes, pitfalls and potentialities in comparative social work research’, Social Policy and Society,
O'Cathain, A., Murphy, E. and Nicholl, J. (2010) ‘Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies’, BMJ, 341, 4587.
ONS (2016) ‘Lone Parent Families in the UK, by Country, 1996 – 2015’, [accessed 11.12.2017].
Osborn, M. (2014) ‘Working with fathers to safeguard children’, Child Abuse and Neglect, 38, 9931001.
Palkovitz, R. and Hull, J. (2018) ‘Towards a resource theory of fathering’, Journal of Family Theory and Review, 10, 181–98.
Parsons, T. and Bales, R. (1956) Family, Socialization and Interaction Process, London: Routledge.
Poole, E., Speight, S., O'Brien, M., Connolly, S. and Aldrich, M. (2013) ‘What do we know about non-resident fathers?’, Understanding Society, [accessed 09.08.2017].
Saltiel, D. (2013) ‘Understanding complexity in families’ lives: the usefulness of family practices as an aid to decision making’, Child and Family Social Work, 18, 1, 1524.
Scourfield, J., Tolman, R., Maxwell, N., Holland, S., Bullock, A. and Sloan, L. (2012) ‘Results of training course for social workers on engaging fathers in child protection’, Children and Youth Service Review, 34, 1425–32.
Shier, M. L., Engstrom, S. and Graham, J. R. (2011) ‘International migration and social work: a review of the literature’, Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies, 9, 1, 3856.
Smart, C. (2007) Personal Life, Cambridge: Polity.
Studsrød, I., Ellingsen, I., Muñoz Guzmán, C. and Mancinas Espinoza, S. E. (2018) ‘Conceptualizations of family and social work family practice in Chile, Mexico and Norway’, Social Policy and Society, doi: 10.1017/S1474746418000234.
United Nations (2016) International Migration Report, 2015, Department of Economic Social Affairs, New York: United Nations.
Valtonen, K. (2008) Social Work and Migration: Immigrant and Refugee Settlement and Integration, London: Routledge.
Vertovec, S. (2007) ‘Superdiversity and its implications’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30, 6, 1024–54.
Walsh, J. (2018) ‘Migrant family display: a strategy for achieving recognition and validation in the host country’, Sociological Research Online, 23, 1, 6783.
Walsh, J., White, S., Morris, K. and Doherty, P. (2018) ‘How do you solve a problem like Maria: family complexity and institutional complications in UK Social Work’, European Journal of Social Work,
Wastell, D., White, S., Broadhurst, K., Hall, C., Peckover, S. and Pithouse, A. (2010) ‘Children's services in the iron cage of performance management: street level bureaucracy and the spectre of Švejkism’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 19, 310–20.
Weeks, J., Heaphy, B. and Donovan, C. (2001) Same Sex Intimacies: Families of Choice and Other Life Experiments, London: Routledge.
Welbourne, P. and Dixon, J. (2015) ‘Child protection and welfare: cultures, policies and practices’, European Journal of Social Work, 19, 6, 827–40.
Williams, F. (2004) Rethinking Family, UK: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.
Yin, R. K. (2014) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, London: Sage.
Zanoni, L., Warburton, W., Bussey, K. and McMaugh, A. (2013) ‘Fathers as ‘core business’ in child welfare practice and research: an interdisciplinary review’, Children and Youth Service Review, 35, 1055–70.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Social Policy and Society
  • ISSN: 1474-7464
  • EISSN: 1475-3073
  • URL: /core/journals/social-policy-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed