Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

DOES STUDYING VOCABULARY IN SMALLER SETS INCREASE LEARNING?: The Effects of Part and Whole Learning on Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition

  • Tatsuya Nakata (a1) and Stuart Webb (a2)
Abstract

The present study examined the effects of part and whole learning on the acquisition of second language (L2, English) vocabulary. In whole learning, the materials to be learned are repeated in one large block, whereas, in part learning, the materials are divided into smaller blocks and repeated. Experiment 1 compared the effects of the following three treatments: 20-item whole learning, four-item part learning, and 10-item part learning. Unlike previous studies, part and whole learning were matched in spacing. In Experiment 2, spacing as well as the part-whole learning distinction were manipulated, and the following three treatments were compared: 20-item whole learning, four-item part learning with short spacing, and four-item part learning with long spacing. Results of the two experiments suggest that, (a) as long as spacing is equivalent, the part-whole distinction has little effect on learning, and (b) spacing has a larger effect on learning than the part-whole distinction.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Tatsuya Nakata, Faculty of Foreign Language Studies, Kansai University, 3-3-35 Yamate-cho, Suita-shi, Osaka Japan 564-8680. E-mail: nakata@kansai-u.ac.jp
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

JBarcroft . (2007). Effects of opportunities for word retrieval during second language vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 57, 3556.

J.Barcroft , & SRott . (2010). Partial word form learning in the written mode in L2 German and Spanish. Applied Linguistics, 31, 623650.

WBrown . (1924). Whole and part methods in learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 15, 229233.

N. J.Cepeda , H.Pashler , E.Vul , J. T.Wixted , & DRohrer . (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354380.

N. J.Cepeda , E.Vul , D.Rohrer , J. T.Wixted , & HPashler . (2008). Spacing effects in learning: A temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Psychological Science, 19, 10951102.

N. J.Cepeda , N.Coburn , D.Rohrer , J. T.Wixted , M. C.Mozer , & HPashler . (2009). Optimizing distributed practice: Theoretical analysis and practical implications. Experimental Psychology, 56, 236246.

C.Chen , & JTruscott . (2010). The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 31, 693713.

JCohen . (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155159.

E.Crothers , & PSuppes . (1967). Experiments in second language learning. New York, NY: Academic Press.

IElgort . (2011). Deliberate learning and vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Language Learning, 61, 367413.

N. CEllis . (1995). The psychology of foreign language vocabulary acquisition: Implications for CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8, 103128.

N. CEllis . (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143188.

T.Fitzpatrick , I.Al-Qarni , & PMeara . (2008). Intensive vocabulary learning: A case study. Language Learning Journal, 36, 239248.

G.Gillund , & R. MShiffrin . (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 167.

H.Hausman , & NKornell . (2014). Mixing topics while studying does not enhance learning. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3, 153160.

J. HHulstijn . (2002). What does the impact of frequency tell us about the language acquisition device? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 269273.

S.Joseph , Y.Watanabe , Y.-J.Shiung , B.Choi , & CRobbins . (2009). Key aspects of computer assisted vocabulary learning (CAVL): Combined effects of media, sequencing and task type. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 4, 136.

S. H. K.Kang , R. V.Lindsey , M. C.Mozer , & HPashler . (2014). Retrieval practice over the long term: Should spacing be expanding or equal-interval? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 15441550.

J. D.Karpicke , & H. LRoediger . (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 319, 966968.

NKornell . (2009). Optimising learning using flashcards: Spacing is more effective than cramming. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 12971317.

DLarsen-Freeman . (2002). Making sense of frequency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 275285.

J. M.Logan , & D. ABalota . (2008). Expanded vs. equal interval spaced retrieval practice: Exploring different schedules of spacing and retention interval in younger and older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 15, 257280.

G. OMcGeoch . (1931). The intelligence quotient as a factor in the whole-part problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 333358.

J.Metcalfe , N.Kornell , & BFinn . (2009). Delayed versus immediate feedback in children’s and adults’ vocabulary learning. Memory & Cognition, 37, 10771087.

J.-A.Mondria , & BWiersma . (2004). Receptive, productive and receptive + productive L2 vocabulary learning: What difference does it make? In B.Laufer (Ed.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition, and testing (pp. 79100). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.

TNakata . (2011). Computer-assisted second language vocabulary learning in a paired-associate paradigm: A critical investigation of flashcard software. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24, 1738.

TNakata . (2015). Effects of expanding and equal spacing on second language vocabulary learning: Does gradually increasing spacing increase vocabulary learning? Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1017/S0272263114000825.

I. S. PNation . (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 5982.

H.Pashler , D.Rohrer , N. J.Cepeda , & S. KCarpenter . (2007). Enhancing learning and retarding forgetting: Choices and consequences. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 187193.

M. A.Pyc , & K. ARawson . (2007). Examining the efficiency of schedules of distributed retrieval practice. Memory & Cognition, 35, 19171927.

M. A.Pyc , & K. ARawson . (2012). Are judgments of learning made after correct responses during retrieval practice sensitive to lag and criterion level effects? Memory & Cognition, 40, 976988.

J. G. W.Raaijmakers , J. M. C.Schrijnemakers , & FGremmen . (1999). How to deal with “the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy”: Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 416426.

D.Rohrer , & HPashler . (2007). Increasing retention without increasing study time. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 183186.

M. P.Steinel , J. H.Hulstijn , & WSteinel . (2007). Second language idiom learning in a paired-associate paradigm: Effects of direction of learning, direction of testing, idiom imageability, and idiom transparency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 449484.

B. C.Storm , R. A.Bjork , & J. CStorm . (2010). Optimizing retrieval as a learning event: When and why expanding retrieval practice enhances long-term retention. Memory & Cognition, 38, 244253.

F. J. JVan Bussel . (1994). Design rules for computer-aided learning of vocabulary items in a second language. Computers in Human Behavior, 10, 6376.

S. AWebb . (2005). Receptive and productive vocabulary learning: The effects of reading and writing on word knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 3352.

S. AWebb . (2008). Receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 7995.

S. AWebb . (2009). The effects of pre-learning vocabulary on reading comprehension and writing. Canadian Modern Language Review, 65, 441470.

K. T.Wissman , K. A.Rawson , & M. APyc . (2012). How and when do students use flashcards? Memory, 20, 568579.

R.Zahar , T.Cobb , & NSpada . (2001). Acquiring vocabulary through reading: Effects of frequency and contextual richness. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 541572.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  • ISSN: 0272-2631
  • EISSN: 1470-1545
  • URL: /core/journals/studies-in-second-language-acquisition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Nakata and Webb supplementary material
Appendix

 Word (100 KB)
100 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score