Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Gustafsson, Johan E. 2014. Combinative consequentialism and the problem of act versions. Philosophical Studies, Vol. 167, Issue. 3, p. 585.


    Snelling, P. C. 2014. What's Wrong with Tombstoning and What Does This Tell Us About Responsibility for Health?. Public Health Ethics, Vol. 7, Issue. 2, p. 144.


    Louise, Jennie 2006. Right Motive, Wrong Action: Direct Consequentialism and Evaluative Conflict. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 9, Issue. 1, p. 65.


    ×

Can Consequentialism Cover Everything?

  • Bart Streumer (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0953820800003976
  • Published online: 01 January 2009
Abstract

Derek Parfit, Philip Pettit, and Michael Smith defend a version of consequentialism that covers everything. I argue that this version of consequentialism is false. Consequentialism, I argue, can only cover things that belong to a combination of things that agents can bring about.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. J. C. Smart , ‘An Outline of A System of Utilitarian Ethics’, in J. J. C. Smart and Bernard Williams , Utilitarianism: For and Against, Cambridge, 1973

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Utilitas
  • ISSN: 0953-8208
  • EISSN: 1741-6183
  • URL: /core/journals/utilitas
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×