Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    de Maagt, Sem 2014. In defence of fact-dependency. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 44, Issue. 3-4, p. 443.


    ×

What Is the Point of Justice?

  • ANDREW MASON (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0953820812000234
  • Published online: 27 November 2012
Abstract

Conflicting answers to the question of what principles of justice are for may generate very different ways of theorizing about justice. Indeed divergent answers to it are at the heart of G. A. Cohen's disagreement with John Rawls. Cohen thinks that the roots of this disagreement lie in the constructivist method that Rawls employs, which mistakenly treats the principles that emerge from a procedure that involves factual assumptions as ultimate principles of justice. But I argue that even if Rawls were to abandon his constructivism, and to accept Cohen's argument that ultimate principles of justice are not grounded directly in any facts, their divergent views concerning the proper role of principles of justice would lead them to different conclusions. I contend that even if ultimate principles of justice are not directly grounded in any facts, the role that principles of justice are needed to play may mean that their justification depends upon facts about what is feasible and facts about what is burdensome to people. Contrary to what Cohen maintains, being dependent on the facts in this manner does not preclude a principle from being ultimate; nor do principles which have this sort of dependence on the facts necessarily combine justice with other values in a way that must lead to conflation.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

P. Gilabert, ‘Feasibility and Socialism’, Journal of Political Philosophy 19 (2011), pp. 5263

T. Pogge, ‘Cohen to the Rescue!’, Ratio 21 (2008), pp. 454–75

R. Jubb, ‘Logical and Epistemic Foundationalism about Grounding: The Triviality of Facts and Principles’, Res Publica 15 (2009), pp. 337–53

A. Williams, ‘Justice, Incentives and Constructivism’, Ratio 21 (2008), pp. 476–93

A. Abizadeh, ‘Cooperation, Pervasive Impact, and Coercion: On the Scope (not Site) of Distributive Justice’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (2007), pp. 318–58

A. Swift, ‘The Value of Philosophy in Nonideal Circumstances’, Social Theory and Practice 34 (2008), pp. 363–87

G. A. Cohen, ‘Facts and Principles’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (2003), pp. 211–45

C. Farrelly, ‘Justice in Ideal Theory: A Refutation’, Political Studies 55 (2007), pp. 844–64

A. Sen, ‘What Do We Want from a Theory of Justice?’, Journal of Philosophy 103 (2006), pp. 215–38

I. Robeyns, ‘Ideal Theory in Theory and Practice’, Social Theory and Practice 34 (2008), pp. 341–62

L. Valentini, ‘On the Apparent Paradox of Ideal Theory’, Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2009), pp. 332–55

A. J. Simmons, ‘Ideal and Nonideal Theory’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 38 (2010)

A. Mason, ‘Rawlsian Theory and the Circumstances of Politics’, Political Theory 38 (2010), pp. 658–83

A. Hamlin and Z. Stemplowska, ‘Theory, Ideal Theory and the Theory of Ideals’, Political Studies Review 10 (2012), pp. 4862

J. Raikka, ‘The Feasibility Condition in Political Theory’, Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (1998), pp. 2740

S. Scheffler, ‘Is the Basic Structure Basic?’, The Egalitarian Conscience: Essays in Honour of G. A. Cohen, ed. C. Sypnowich (Oxford, 2006), pp. 102–29

L. Murphy, ‘Institutions and the Demands of Justice’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (1999), pp. 251–91

S. Shiffrin, ‘Incentives, Motives, and Talents’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 38 (2010), pp. 111–42

J. Dancy, Ethics without Principles (Oxford, 2004), pp. 3843

D. Estlund, ‘Human Nature and the Limits (If Any) of Political Philosophy’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 39 (2011), pp. 207–37

D. Copp, Pluralism and Stability in Liberal Theory’, Journal of Political Philosophy 4 (1996), pp. 191206

P. Tomlin, ‘Survey Article: Internal Doubts about Cohen's Rescue of Justice’, Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (2010), pp. 228–47

A. Williams, ‘Incentives, Inequality, and Publicity’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (1998), pp. 225–47

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Utilitas
  • ISSN: 0953-8208
  • EISSN: 1741-6183
  • URL: /core/journals/utilitas
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×