Electrical synapses or gap junctions occur between many retinal neurons. However, in most cases, the gap junctions have not been visualized directly. Instead, their presence has been inferred from tracer spread throughout the network of cells. Thus, tracer coupling is taken as a marker for the presence of gap junctions between coupled cells. AII amacrine cells are critical interneurons in the rod pathway of the mammalian retina. Rod bipolar cell output passes to AII amacrine cells, which in turn make conventional synapses with OFF cone bipolar cells and gap junctions with ON cone bipolar cells. Injections of biotinylated tracers into AII amacrine cells reveals coupling between the AII amacrine cell network and heterologous coupling with a variety of ON cone bipolar cells, including the calbindin-positive cone bipolar cell. To directly visualize gap junctions in this network, we prepared material for electron microscopy that was double labeled with antibodies to calretinin and calbindin to label AII amacrine cells and calbindin-positive cone bipolar cells, respectively. AII amacrine cells were postsynaptic to large vesicle-laden rod bipolar terminals, as previously reported. Gap junctions were identified between AII amacrine cells and calbindin-positive cone bipolar cell terminals identified by the presence of immunostaining and ribbon synapses. This represents direct confirmation of gap junctions between two different yet positively identified cells, which are tracer coupled, and provides additional evidence that tracer coupling with Neurobiotin indicates the presence of gap junctions. These results also definitively establish the presence of gap junctions between AII amacrine cells and calbindin bipolar cells which can therefore carry rod signals to the ON alpha ganglion cell.

We report here a reexamination of the developmental expression of cone opsins in the zebrafish retina. The red- and blue-sensitive opsins appear at 51 h postfertilization (hpf) whereas ultraviolet (UV) opsin is not seen until after 55 hpf. More cells show red cone opsin expression than blue at 51 and 55 hpf, indicating the sequence of cone opsin expression in zebrafish is first red, then blue, and finally UV. Curiously, morphological development of the cones is in reverse order; UV cones appear quite mature by day 6–7 postfertilization (pf), but morphologically, red cones do not appear adult-like until 15–20 days pf.

Normal photoreceptor cells on the ventral nerve of Limulus respond to a moderately intense flash with a large receptor potential or current. Occasionally, cells are found in which the same flash evokes only a small receptor potential or current. Our investigations reveal physiological reasons for the poor light sensitivity in these “unusual cells.” In unusual cells prolonged illumination with intense light evokes a step-like inward current with an amplitude of some nanoamperes, but without a large transient peak. The current appears to be summed up of single photon responses with amplitudes smaller than about 50 pA. Their time course is similar to that of small single photon responses forming the so-called macroscopic C1 component in normal cells. The macroscopic current evoked by an intense flash has slow activation and deactivation kinetics and reaches a saturated amplitude of about 4–5 nanoamperes. The light-intensity dependence of the current evoked by flashes or by prolonged illumination has a slope of about 1 in log–log plots. The decay kinetics of the current is similar to that of the C1 component measured in normal cells after the block of the C2 component. Occasionally, the step-like current is superposed by large standard bumps. These bumps are blocked by the Ca2+-ATPase inhibitor cyclopiazonic acid, while the sustained inward current persists. We conclude that in unusual cells the light-activated current is identical to the C1 component of normal cells. The phospholipase C pathway that in normal cells presumably gives rise to the C2 component functions only with a low efficiency in unusual cells.

The following is a correction for the article “Spectral sensitivity of macaque monkeys measured with ERG flicker photometry,” by Gerald H. Jacobs and Jess F. Deegan II, that appeared in Visual Neuroscience, 1997, 14, 921–928. As a result of a transcription error the spectral sensitivity values included in Table 1 were incorrect.

The electroretinogram (ERG) of the rhodopsin knockout (rho−/−) mouse of Humphries et al. (1997) (Humphries et al., 1997) was studied for evidence of light-evoked rod activity and to describe the cone function. The rho−/− retina develops normal numbers of rod and cone nuclei, but the rods have no outer segments, and no rhodopsin is found by immunohistochemistry. The dark-adapted ERG threshold was elevated 4.7 log units above wild-type (WT) control mice, indicating that any residual rod responses were reduced >50,000-fold, consistent with a complete functional knockout. The dark-adapted rho−/− ERG had a cone waveform, and the spectral sensitivity peaked near 510 nm for both dark-adapted and light-adapted conditions, without evidence of a Purkinje shift. The light-adapted ERG b-wave amplitude of young rho−/− mice was the same as WT. The amplitude remained steady up to postnatal day P47, but thereafter it declined to only 1–2% by P80 when no cone outer segments remained. Cone b-wave threshold of dark-adapted rho−/− mice was −1.07 ± 0.39 log cd-s/m2 (n = 17), which is 1.27 log units more sensitive than light-adapted thresholds against a rod-suppressing Ganzfeld background of 1.61 log scotopic cd/m2. This indicates that dark-adapted WT responses to still dimmer stimuli are exclusively rod driven with minimal cone intrusion. Above this cone threshold intensity, the dark-adapted b-wave of WT will be a summation of rod and cone responses. Threshold versus intensity (TVI) studies gave no evidence of a rod influence on the mouse cone b-wave.