Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Glyphosate-Resistant Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) Control in WideStrike® Flex Cotton

  • Kelly A. Barnett (a1), Thomas C. Mueller (a2) and Lawrence E. Steckel (a1)

A field study was conducted in 2009, 2010, and 2011 on a grower's field with a known population of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed to determine potential control options utilizing a WideStrike® cotton variety. Glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed control and cotton response to herbicide applications were both assessed. Few herbicide treatments provided greater than 80% control. Glufosinate followed by glufosinate was the only treatment that provided greater than 90% control at each assessment timing. Other effective treatments were glufosinate alone, glufosinate plus glyphosate, glyphosate plus pyrithiobac, and glufosinate plus fluometuron. Results from this study indicate that few of the studied herbicide treatments provide effective control of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed without reducing yield in WideStrike cotton. Treatments that had the highest level of giant ragweed control at all ratings and also had the highest yield included glufosinate followed by glufosinate, glufosinate plus pyrithiobac, and glufosinate plus fluometuron at either rate. However, glufosinate followed by glufosinate was the only treatment that resulted in greater than 90% control of giant ragweed without reducing crop yield.

Se realizõ un estudio de campo en 2009, 2010 y 2011 en el campo de un productor que tenĩa una poblaciõn de Ambrosia trifida resistente a glyphosate, para determinar opciones potenciales de control utilizando una variedad WideStrike® de algodõn. Se evaluõ el control de A. trifida resistente a glyphosate y la respuesta del algodõn a aplicaciones de herbicidas. Pocos tratamientos con herbicidas brindaron un control superior al 80%. Glufosinate seguido de glufosinate fue el ũnico tratamiento que brindõ un control superior al 90% en cada momento de evaluaciõn. Otros tratamientos efectivos fueron glufosinate solo, glufosinate más glyphosate, glyphosate más pyrithiobac, y glufosinate más fluometuron. Los resultados de este estudio indican que pocos de los tratamientos con herbicidas estudiados proveen un control efectivo de A. trifida resistente a glyphosate sin reducir el rendimiento del algodõn WideStrike. Los tratamientos que tuvieron los mayores niveles de control de A. trifida en todas las evaluaciones y además tuvieron los mayores rendimientos incluyeron: glufosinate seguido de glufosinate, glufosinate más pyrithiobac y glufosinate más fluometuron en cada dosis. Sin embargo, glufosinate seguido de glufosinate fue el ũnico tratamiento que resultõ en un control de A. trifida superior al 90% sin reducir el rendimiento del cultivo.

Corresponding author
Corresponding author's E-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

H. A. Abul-Fatih and F. A. Bazzaz 1979a. The biology of Ambrosia trifida L. I. Influence of species removal on the organization of the plant community. New Phytol. 83 :813816.

H. A. Abul-Fatih and F. A. Bazzaz 1979b. The biology of Ambrosia trifida L. II. Germination, emergence, growth, and survival. New Phytol. 83 :817827.

S. D. Askew , W. A. Bailey , G. H. Scott , and J. W. Wilcut 2002. Economic assessment of weed management for transgenic and nontransgenic cotton in tilled and nontilled systems. Weed Sci. 50 :512520.

I. J. Bassett and C. W. Crompton 1982. The biology of Canadian weeds. 55. Ambrosia trifida L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62 :10031010.

L. A. Castle , G. Wu , and D. McElroy 2006. Agricultural input traits: past, present and future. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 17 :105112.

A. S. Culpepper , A. C. York , P. Roberts , and J. R. Whitaker 2009. Weed control and crop response to glufosinate applied to ‘PHY 485 WRF' cotton. Weed Technol. 23 :356362.

S. K. Harrison , E. E. Regnier , J. T. Schmoll , and J. E. Webb 2001. Competition and fecundity of giant ragweed in corn. Weed Sci. 49 :224229.

D. C. Hartnett , B. B. Hartnett , and F. A. Bazzaz 1987. Persistence of Ambrosia trifida populations in old fields and responses to successional changes. Am. J. Bot. 74 :12391248.

T. W. Jurik 1991. Population distributions of plant size and light environment of giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) at three densities. Oecologia 87 :539550.

C. H. Koger , A. J. Price , and K. N. Reddy 2005. Weed control and cotton response to combinations of glyphosate and trifloxysulfuron. Weed Technol. 19 :113121.

J. K. Norsworthy , P. Jha , L. E. Steckel , and R. C. Scott 2010. Confirmation and control of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) in Tennessee. Weed Technol. 24 :6470.

J. K. Norsworthy , D. Riar , P. Jha , and R. C. Scott 2011. Confirmation, control, and physiology of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed in Arkansas. Weed Technol. 25 :430435.

R. J. Richardson , H. P. Wilson , and T. E. Hines 2007. Preemergence herbicides followed by trifloxysulfuron postemergence in cotton. Weed Technol. 21 :116.

B. J. Schutte , E. E. Regnier , and S. K. Harrison 2008. The association between seed size and seed longevity among maternal families in Ambrosia trifida L. populations. Seed Sci. Res. 18 :201211.

S. Tan , R. Evans , and B. Singh 2006. Herbicidal inhibitors of amino acid biosynthesis and herbicide-tolerant crops. Amino Acids (Vienna) 30 :195204.

W. E. Thomas , T. T. Britton , S. B. Clewis , S. D. Askew , and J. W. Wilcut 2006. Glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response and weed management with trifloxysulfuron, glyphosate, prometryn, and MSMA. Weed Technol. 20 :613.

J. R. Whitaker , A. C. York , D. L. Jordan , and A. S. Culpepper 2011. Weed management with glyphosate- and glufosinate-based systems in PHY 485 WRF Cotton. Weed Technol. 25 :183191.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Weed Technology
  • ISSN: 0890-037X
  • EISSN: 1550-2740
  • URL: /core/journals/weed-technology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 6 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 33 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th January 2017 - 23rd August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.