Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Utility of Multispectral Imagery for Soybean and Weed Species Differentiation

  • Cody J. Gray (a1), David R. Shaw (a1), Patrick D. Gerard (a2) and Lori M. Bruce (a3)

An experiment was conducted to determine the utility of multispectral imagery for identifying soybean, bare soil, and six weed species commonly found in Mississippi. Weed species evaluated were hemp sesbania, palmleaf morningglory, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, sicklepod, and smallflower morningglory. Multispectral imagery was analyzed using supervised classification techniques based upon 2-class, 3-class, and 8-class systems. The 2-class system was designed to differentiate bare soil and vegetation. The 3-class system was used to differentiate bare soil, soybean, and weed species. Finally, the 8-class system was designed to differentiate bare soil, soybean, and all weed species independently. Soybean classification accuracies classified as vegetation for the 2-class system were greater than 95%, and bare soil classification accuracies were greater than 90%. In the 3-class system, soybean classification accuracies were 70% or greater. Classification of soybean decreased slightly in the 3-class system when compared to the 2-class system because of the 3-class system separating soybean plots from the weed plots, which was not done in the 2-class system. Weed classification accuracies increased as weed density or weeks after emergence (WAE) increased. The greatest weed classification accuracies were obtained once weed species were allowed to grow for 10 wk. Palmleaf morningglory and pitted morningglory classification accuracies were greater than 90% for 10 WAE using the 3-class system. Palmleaf morningglory and pitted morningglory at the highest densities of 6 plants/m2 produced the highest classification accuracies for the 8-class system once allowed to grow for 10 wk. All other weed species generally produced classification accuracies less than 50%, regardless of planting density. Thus, multispectral imagery has the potential for weed detection, especially when being used in a management system when individual weed species differentiation is not essential, as in the 2-class or 3-class system. However, weed detection was not obtained until 8 to 10 WAE, which is unacceptable in production agriculture. Therefore, more refined imagery acquisition with higher spatial and/or spectral resolution and more sophisticated analyses need to be further explored for this technology to be used early-season when it would be most valuable.

Corresponding author
Corresponding author's E-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

K. D. Gibson , R. Dirks , C. R. Medlin , and L. Johnston 2004. Detection of weed species in soybean using multispectral digital images. Weed Technol 18:742749.

H. J. Goudy , K. A. Bennet , R. B. Brown , and F. J. Tardif 2001. Evaluation of site-specific weed management using a direct-injection sprayer. Weed Sci 49:359366.

C. H. Koger , D. R. Shaw , C. E. Watson , and K. N. Reddy 2003. Detecting late-season weed infestations in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 17:696704.

D. W. Lamb and R. B. Brown 2001. Remote-sensing and mapping of weeds in crops. J. Agric. Eng. Res 78:117125.

L. W. Lass , B. Shafii , W. J. Price , and D. C. Thill 2000. Assessing agreement in multispectral images of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) with ground truth data using a Bayesian methodology. Weed Technol 14:539544.

C. R. Medlin , D. R. Shaw , P. D. Gerard , and F. E. LaMastus 2000. Using remote sensing to detect weed infestations in Glycine max . Weed Sci 48:393398.

A. M. Smith and R. E. Blackshaw 2003. Weed-crop discrimination using remote sensing: A detached leaf experiment. Weed Technol 17:811820.

P. K. Thornton , R. H. Fawcett , J. B. Dent , and T. J. Perkins 1990. Spatial weed distribution and economic thresholds for weed control. Crop Prot 9:337342.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Weed Technology
  • ISSN: 0890-037X
  • EISSN: 1550-2740
  • URL: /core/journals/weed-technology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 3 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 53 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th January 2017 - 25th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.