Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-r6c6k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T10:33:21.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Role of zinc along with ascorbic acid and folic acid during long-term in vitro albumin glycation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2009

Rashmi Santosh Tupe
Affiliation:
Agharkar Research Institute, G. G. Agarkar Road, Pune411004, India
Vaishali Vilas Agte*
Affiliation:
Agharkar Research Institute, G. G. Agarkar Road, Pune411004, India
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Vaishali V. Agte, fax +91 020 25651542, email vaishaliagte@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the role of Zn alone and in the presence of ascorbic acid (AA) and folic acid (FA) in albumin glycation. Glycation was performed by incubations of bovine serum albumin with glucose at 37°C along with Zn, AA or FA separately and Zn+AA or Zn+FA for 150 d. Glycation-mediated modifications were monitored as fluorescence of advanced glycation endproducts, carbonyl formation, β aggregation (thioflavin T and Congo red dyes), albumin-bound Zn, thiol groups and glycated aggregate's toxicity in HepG2 cells. Zn inhibited glycation and β aggregation, probably due to observed higher protein-bound Zn. It also protected protein thiols and increased cell survival. AA and FA enhanced glycation, which was lowered in Zn-co-incubated samples. FA increased albumin-bound Zn and showed maximum cell survival. Although these results warrant further in vivo investigation, the present data help in the understanding of the interplay of Zn with micronutrients in albumin glycation.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2009
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Glycation of bovine serum albumin (BSA) samples as measured with advanced glycation endproducts (AGE) spectra and protein carbonyl assay. Emission scans from 400 to 550 nm were taken with an excitation wavelength of 370 nm for AGE. (a) AGE fluorescence in the presence of Zn along with controls. AU, arbitrary units; (–··–), BSA; (–▲–), BSA+glucose (G) (positive control); (—), BSA+G+Zn. (b) Spectra of glycated samples by co-incubation of Zn along with ascorbic acid (AA) or folic acid (FA). (·· × ··), BSA+G+Zn+AA; (- - -), BSA+G+AA; (–▲–), BSA+G+FA; (—), BSA+G+Zn+FA. (c) Protein carbonyls expressed as nmol carbonyls/mg protein. Values are means (n 3), with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. ** Mean value was significantly different from that of the BSA+G treatment (positive control) (P < 0·01; one-way ANOVA).

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Transition of amino acid residues to β-sheet conformation as indicated by amyloid-specific dyes. (a) Effect of Zn along with ascorbic acid (AA) or folic acid (FA) on thioflavin T fluorescence. AU, arbitrary units; BSA, bovine serum albumin; G, glucose. Values are means (n 3), with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. * Mean value was marginally significantly different from that of the BSA+G treatment (positive control) (P = 0·08; one-way ANOVA). (b) Effect of Zn along with AA or FA on Congo red absorbance at 530 nm. Values are means (n 3), with standard deviations represented by horizontal bars. Mean value was significantly different from that of the BSA+G treatment (positive control): ** P < 0·01, *** P < 0·001 (one-way ANOVA).

Figure 2

Fig. 3 Effect of Zn alone or along with ascorbic acid (AA) or folic acid (FA) upon glycated albumin cytotoxicity. The results were expressed as percentage relative viability to the unglycated bovine serum albumin (BSA) control. G, glucose. Values are means (n 5–6), with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. Mean value was significantly different from that of the BSA+G treatment (positive control): * P < 0·05, ** P < 0·01, *** P < 0·001 (one-way ANOVA).

Figure 3

Fig. 4 Effect of different factors on (a) albumin–Zn binding and (b) thiol groups of albumin during glycation. BSA, bovine serum albumin; G, glucose; AA, ascorbic acid; FA, folic acid. Values are means (n 3), with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. Mean value was significantly different from that of the BSA+G treatment (positive control): * P < 0·05, ** P < 0·01, *** P < 0·001 (one-way ANOVA).