Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T00:04:54.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The diplomacy of empire: Fatimids and Zirids, 990–1062

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2015

Michael Brett*
Affiliation:
SOAS, University of London

Abstract

Over a period of some forty years, 380/990–421/1030, the Fatimids in Egypt exchanged embassies with their Zirid viceroys in Ifrīqiya after these had been recognized as a hereditary dynasty, and to a lesser extent with their Kalbid deputies in Sicily. Sijillāt or official letters of the Fatimid chancery, accompanied by sumptuous presents, invested the Zirids with their authority and favoured them with important announcements, while the Zirids replied in kind. The embassies were ostentatiously welcomed by the Zirids as proof of their legitimacy, while serving to maintain the connection with Cairo on which the Fatimids were similarly dependent for the sake of their imperial standing in the world. The importance of that connection to both dynasties was shown in the 440s/1050s, when it was broken by the Zirids and restored by a Fatimid intervention, celebrated in a fresh series of sijillāt. With their emphasis on the style as much as the substance of the messages, the exchanges are excellent illustrations of mediaeval diplomatic correspondence as described by John Wansbrough in Lingua Franca in the Mediterranean.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © SOAS, University of London 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Wansbrough, J., Lingua Franca in the Mediterranean (Surrey, 1996)Google Scholar.

2 Only, in fact, as charters granted to and preserved by Jewish and Christian communities, chiefly the monks of Mount Sinai, published by Stern, S.M. as Fāṭimid Decrees (London, 1964)Google Scholar.

3 The Ifrīqiyan Sijill of al-Mustansir, 445H/1053–4CE”, in Vermeulen, U., D'hulster, K. and Steenbergen, J. Van (eds), Egypt and Syria in the Fatimid, Ayyubid and Mamluk Eras, V (Leuven, 2009)Google Scholar.

4 Brett, M., “Fatimid historiography: a case study – the quarrel with the Zirids, 1048–58”, in Ibn Khaldun and the Medieval Maghrib, Variorum Series (Aldershot, 1999)Google Scholar, no. VIII.

5 Cf. Brett, M., The Rise of the Fatimids: The World of the Mediterranean and the Middle East in the Fourth Century of the Hijra, Tenth Century CE (Leiden, 2001), 353–8Google Scholar.

6 Cf. Brett, Ibn Khaldun, nos VIII and IX.

7 al-Maqrīzī, in Ahmad, M.H.M. (ed.), Ittiʿāẓ al-ḥunafāʾ, vol. 2 (Cairo, 1967–73)Google Scholar.

8 Ibn ʿIdhārī, in Colin, G.S. and Lévi-Provençal, E. (eds), Kitāb al-Bayān al-mughrib, vol. 1 (Leiden, 1948)Google Scholar.

9 See appendix.

10 Bayān 248–9; Ittiʿāẓ,16.

11 Cf. Idris, H.R., La Berbérie orientale sous les Zīrīdes (Paris, 1962), 99100Google Scholar.

12 Idris, La Berbérie orientale, 101–2.

13 Bayān, 259, 261 (sub anno 405; Ittiʿāẓ, II, 99, 111 (misattribution to 405).

14 Bayān, 260.

15 Bayān, 269.

16 Bayān, 269–70.

17 Ittiʿāẓ, II, 126.

18 Bayān, 271–2.

19 Bayān, 271–2. Cf. the command in conclusion to the sijill of 445, 1053–4, sent to the Yemen, to publish it from the pulpits, in town and country: see above, n. 2.

20 Bayān, 271–2.

21 Ittiʿāẓ, II, 111.

22 Bayān, 269–70; Ittiʿāẓ, II, 115.

23 Bayān, 271–2; Ittiʿāẓ, II, 132.

24 Ittiʿāẓ, II, 177–8.

25 Bayān, 246, 247; Ibn Abī Dīnār, Al-Muʾnis fī akhbār Ifrīqiya wa Tūnis, second ed. (Tunis, 1350H), 77–8Google Scholar.

26 Bayān, 249.

27 Bayān, 248–9; Ittiʿāẓ, II, 16.

28 al-Maqrīzī, Khiṭaṭ (Cairo, 1324–6H), I, 370.

29 Bayān, 260–1; Ittiʿāẓ, II, 110–11.

30 Ittiʿāẓ, II, 177–8.

31 Bayān, pp. 248–9; Ittiʿāẓ, II, 16, 126.

32 Ibn al-Ṣayrafī, Al-Ishāra ilā man nāla al-wizāra, ed. Mukhlis, A., Bulletin de l'Institut français d'Archéologie orientale, 26, 1924, 72Google Scholar.

33 Bayān, 269–70; Ittiʿāẓ, II, 115.

34 Ittiʿāẓ, II, 99, 111.

35 Bayān, 269–70, 271–2; Ittiʿāẓ, II, 115, 132.

36 Bayān, 248–9; Ittiʿāẓ, II, 16; cf. Brett, Rise of the Fatimids, 299–300, 327, 378.

37 Bayān, 259; Ittiʿāẓ, II, 99.

38 Cf. Brett, Rise of the Fatimids, 335 and n. 57; 363.

39 Cf. Metcalfe, A., The Muslims of Medieval Italy (Edinburgh, 2009), 72–3Google Scholar; Ittiʿāẓ, II, 99.

40 Ittiʿāẓ, II, 99. Sayf al-Mulk is perhaps preferable to the variant Sayf al-Milla: Metcalfe, The Muslims of Medieval Italy.

41 Ittiʿāẓ, II, 136; al-Musabbiḥī, in Sayyid, A.F. and Bianquis, Th. (eds), Tome quarantième de la chronique d’Égypte de Musabbiḥī, I, Partie historique (Cairo, 1978), 17Google Scholar, 18, 22.

42 Cf. Brett, Rise of the Fatimids, 296–8, 324–5.

43 Cf. Idris, , La Berbérie orientale sous les Zīrīdes, 90106Google Scholar, 159–65; Brett, Ibn Khaldun and the Medieval Maghrib, no. XIV.

44 Cf. Brett, Ibn Khaldun and the Medieval Maghrib, nos VIII, IX and X.

45 Ittiʿāẓ, II, 261.

46 Cf., for example, Brett, M., “Al-Karāza al-Marqusīya. The Coptic Church in the Fatimid Empire”, in, Vermeulen, U., D'hulster, K. and Van Steenbergen, J. (eds), Egypt and Syria in the Fatimid, Ayyubid and Mamluk Eras (Leuven, 2005), IVGoogle Scholar, 33–60, and “Badr al-Jamālī and the Fatimid renascence”, ibid., 61–78.

47 Cf. Brett, Ibn Khaldun and the Medieval Maghrib, no. XIII.

48 Cf. Johns, J., Arabic Administration in Norman Sicily: the Royal Dīwān (Cambridge, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, ch. 10, “The Norman dīwān and Fātimid Egypt”.