No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Correspondence conception of memory: A good match is hard to find
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 February 2010
Abstract
The distinction that Koriat & Goldsmith have drawn between laboratory and naturalistic research is largely valid, but the metaphor they have chosen to characterize the latter may not be optimal. The “correspondence” approach is vulnerable on conceptual grounds and is not applicable to significant portions of empirical research.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996