Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T12:18:09.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Living in the Present

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2020

Martijn Wallage
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay examines two conceptions of the ancient ideal of ‘living in the present’, one that may be called ‘Platonic’, suggested by a remark of Ludwig Wittgenstein, and one that may be called ‘Stoic’, developed by Pierre Hadot. On both conceptions, a life lived and considered in the right way is complete in the present, so that nothing is wanting. I introduce a problem concerning the coherence of this concept: Life involves movement, and movement is aimed at some completion in the future. How, then, can a life be complete in the present and yet not be static? I consider and reject an answer by Hadot, based on psychological concentration on the present. I then propose an alternative answer, based on Aristotle's concept of complete activity, and discuss its significance for both the Platonic and the Stoic conception of the ideal. Throughout, my focus is on this metaphysical and conceptual problem, thus preparing the way for the ethical question whether ‘living in the present’ would be a good way to live.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy , Volume 95 , Issue 3 , July 2020 , pp. 285 - 307
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackrill, J.L., ‘Aristotle on Action’, Mind, 87 (1978), 595–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, Julia, ed., Cicero. On Moral Ends, trans. Woolf, Raphael (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Armstrong, A.H., trans., Plotinus. Enneads III (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan and Kenny, Anthony, ed., Aristotle's Ethics. Writings from the Complete Works (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri, Oxford Lecture, first published in La Perception du Changement: Conférences faites a l'Université d'Oxford, les 26 et 27 mai 1911 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1911), reprinted in H. Bergson, La Pensée et le mouvant (Paris: Félix Alcan, 1934), 143–76, and translated in The Creative Mind, trans. M. L. Andison (New York: Philosophical Library, 1946), 153–86.Google Scholar
Blecher, Ian, ‘The Stoic Method of Happiness’, Apeiron, 39 (2006), 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, Myles, ‘Kinesis vs. energeia: a much-read passage in (but not of) Aristotle's Metaphysics.’ Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 25 (2008), 219–92.Google Scholar
Cooper, John M., Hutchinson, D.S., ed., Plato. Complete Works (Cambridge: Hackett, 1997).Google Scholar
Gerson, Lloyd P., ed., Plotinus. Enneads, trans. Boys-Stones, George, Dillon, John M., Gerson, Lloyd P., King, R.A.H., Smith, Andrew, Wilberding, James (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre, What is Ancient Philosophy?, trans. Chase, Michael (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2002). Originally published in French under the title Qu'est-ce que la philosophie antique? (Gallimard, 1995).Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre, The present alone is our happiness: conversations with Jeannie Carlier and Arnold I. Davidson, trans. Djaballah, Marc and Chase, Michael (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2009). Originally published in French under the title La Philosophie comme une Manière de Vivre. Entretiens avec Jeannie Carlier et Arnold I. Davidson (Albin Michel, 2001).Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre, ‘“The Present Alone Is Our Joy”: The Meaning of the Present Instant in Goethe and in Ancient Philosophy,’ Diogenes 34 133 (1986). Reprinted in Pierre Hadot, Philosophy as a Way of Life. Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault, ed. Arnold I. Davidson, trans. Michael Chase (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1999).Google Scholar
Mourelatos, Alexander, ‘Aristotle's Kinêsis/Energeia Distinction: A Marginal Note on Kathleen Gill's Paper’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 23 (1993), 385–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalligas, Paul, The Enneads of Plotinus. A Commentary, Vol. 1, trans. Fowden, Elizabeth Key, Pilavachi, Nicholas (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Klein, Jacob, ‘Of Archery and Virtue: Ancient and Modern Conceptions of Value’, Philosopher's Imprint 14 (2014).Google Scholar
Kosman, Aryeh, The Activity of Being. An Essay on Aristotle's Ontology (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A.A. and Sedley, D.N., ed., The Hellenistic Philosophers, Vol. 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Natali, Carlo, ‘A Note on Metaphysics Θ.6, 1048b18–36.’ Rhizomata 1 (2013), 104–114.Google Scholar
Sedley, David, ‘Epicurean versus Cyrenaic Happiness’ in Selfhood and the Soul. Essays on Ancient Thought and Literature in Honour of Christopher Gill, ed. Seaford, Richard, Wilkins, John, and Wright, Matthew (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Sellars, John, ‘Aiôn and Chronos: Deleuze and the Stoic Theory of Time’, Collapse 3 (2007), 177–205.Google Scholar
Slavitt, David R., trans., Boethius. The Consolation of Philosophy (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard, Emotion and Peace of Mind. From Stoic Agitation to Christan Temptation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Warren, James, Facing Death. Epicurus and his Critics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilberding, James, ‘Eternity in Ancient Philosophy’, in Eternity: a History, ed. Melamed, Yitzhak (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 14–56.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. Ogden (London: Kegan Paul, 1922).Google Scholar