Book contents
- Donor-Linked Families in the Digital Age
- Donor-Linked Families in the Digital Age
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Donor-Conceived Families
- Part I ‘DIY’ Donor Linking: Issues and Implications
- Chapter 1 Accessing Origins Information
- Chapter 2 Recipient Parents Using Do-It-Yourself Methods to Make Early Contact with Donor Relatives
- Chapter 3 Donor-Linked Families Connecting through Social Media
- Chapter 4 The Contact Expectations of Australian Sperm Donors Who Connect with Recipients via Online Platforms
- Chapter 5 Parents’ and Offsprings’ Experience of Insemination Fraud
- Part II Children’s and Adults’ Lived Experiences in Diverse Donor-Linked Families
- Part III Institutionalised Resistance to Openness
- Index
- References
Chapter 4 - The Contact Expectations of Australian Sperm Donors Who Connect with Recipients via Online Platforms
from Part I - ‘DIY’ Donor Linking: Issues and Implications
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2023
Book contents
- Donor-Linked Families in the Digital Age
- Donor-Linked Families in the Digital Age
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Donor-Conceived Families
- Part I ‘DIY’ Donor Linking: Issues and Implications
- Chapter 1 Accessing Origins Information
- Chapter 2 Recipient Parents Using Do-It-Yourself Methods to Make Early Contact with Donor Relatives
- Chapter 3 Donor-Linked Families Connecting through Social Media
- Chapter 4 The Contact Expectations of Australian Sperm Donors Who Connect with Recipients via Online Platforms
- Chapter 5 Parents’ and Offsprings’ Experience of Insemination Fraud
- Part II Children’s and Adults’ Lived Experiences in Diverse Donor-Linked Families
- Part III Institutionalised Resistance to Openness
- Index
- References
Summary
While it is difficult to know exactly how often Australian women meet sperm donors online, the growth in online platforms for sperm donors and women to connect suggests the phenomenon is increasing. One reason cited for growth in the practice is that it gives donors the opportunity to develop a relationship with their donor offspring while the children are young. Drawing on qualitative interviews with sperm donors and media coverage of the phenomenon, this chapter considers the experience of donors who meet their recipient online and who have early contact with their offspring. It explores why donors choose to donate outside of the formal clinic environment, their expectations from early contact, and whether these expectations evolve over time. It concludes by considering the implications of increasing informal donation in a country where formal donation is legally regulated.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Donor-Linked Families in the Digital AgeRelatedness and Regulation, pp. 67 - 84Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Bergen, N., & Delacroix, C. (2019). Bypassing the sperm bank: Documenting the experiences of online informal sperm donors. Critical Public Health, 29(5), 584–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2018.1492704Google Scholar
Bossema, E., Pim, M., Janssens, R., Treucker, F., van Duinen, K., Nap, A., & Geenen, R. (2014). An inventory of reasons for sperm donation in formal versus informal settings, Human Fertility, 17(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.3109/14647273.2014.881561Google Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, H., & Tomazin, F. (2021). “Sperm drought fuels unregulated online market and sex assault concerns”, The Age, 22 May. www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/sperm-drought-fuels-unregulated-online-market-and-sex-assault-concerns-20210521-p57u0s.htmlGoogle Scholar
Cook, R., & Golombok, S. (1995). A survey of semen donation: Phase II – the view of the donors, Human Reproduction, 10(4), 951–959. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136069Google Scholar
Daniels, K. R., Curson, R.,& Lewis, G.M. (1996a). Semen donor recruitment: A study of donors in two clinics, Human Reproduction, 11, 746–751. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019247CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daniels, K. R., Ericsson, H. L., & Burn, I. P (1996b). Families and donor insemination: The views of semen donors, Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare, 5(4), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.1996.tb00149.xGoogle Scholar
Dempsey, D. (2010). Conceiving and negotiating reproductive relationships: Lesbians and gay men forming families with children, Sociology, 44(6), 1145–1162. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0038038510381607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempsey, D. (2012a). More like a donor or more like a father? Gay men’s concepts of relatedness to children, Sexualities, 15(2), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1363460711433735Google Scholar
Dempsey, D. (2012b) Gay male couples’ paternal involvement in lesbian parented families, Journal of Family Studies, 18(2–3), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.5172/jfs.2012.18.2-3.155Google Scholar
Freeman, T., Jadva, V., Tanfield, E., & Golombok, S. (2016). Online sperm donation: A survey of the demographic characteristics, motivations, preferences and experiences of sperm donors on a connection website. Human Reproduction, 31(9), 2082–2089. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew166Google Scholar
Gilman, L. (2018). Toxic money or paid altruism: The meaning of payments for identity-release gamete donors. Sociology of Health & Illness, 40(4), 702–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12718Google Scholar
Glover, A. (2018, 15 June). I found my sperm donor on Facebook. www.kidspot.com.au (accessed 24 February 2021).Google Scholar
Graham, S., Freeman, T., & Jadva, V. (2019). A comparison of the characteristics, motivations, preferences and expectations of men donating sperm online or through a sperm bank, Human Reproduction, 1(34), 2208–2218. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez173Google Scholar
Hooper, A. (Host) (2018, 24 December): Jo Donor (Episode 1) [Audio podcast]. In Sperm Donation World Podcast.Google Scholar
Hooper, A. (Host) (2019, 20 January): The Patriarch: John Lyndsey Mayger (Episode 5) [Audio podcast]. In Sperm Donation World Podcast.Google Scholar
Kamenev, M. (2019). Sperm drought. The Monthly, August. www.themonthly.com.au/magazine/august-2019Google Scholar
Kelly, F., & Dempsey, D. (2016). The family law implications of early contact between sperm donors and their donor offspring. Family Matters, 98. https://aifs.gov.au/publications/family-matters/issue-98/family-law-implications-early-contact-between-sperm-donors-and-their-donor-offspringGoogle Scholar
Kelly, F., Dempsey, D., & Frew, C., (2019). The donor-linking practices of Australian fertility clinics, Journal of Law and Medicine, 27(2), 355–368.Google Scholar
Lavoie, K., Côté, I., & de Montigny, F. (2017). Assisted reproduction in the digital age: Stories of Canadian sperm donors offering their gametes online via introduction websites. Journal of Men’s Studies, 26(2), 184–202. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1060826517737047Google Scholar
Lever, C. (2020a, 29 November). Australia’s most-prolific sperm donor who fathered 23 children in ONE YEAR is investigated by authorities – after his “hobby” turned into a full-time job because mums love his ethnicity and strike rate. Daily Mail Australia, https://dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8989065/Married-freelance-sperm-donor-Alan-Phan-investigation-fathering-23-children-year.html (accessed 21 January 2021).Google Scholar
Lever, C. (2020b, 25 September). Australia’s chronic sperm donor shortage is causing family heartache. www.kidspot.com.au (accessed 24 February 2021).Google Scholar
Lever, C. (2020c, 1 December). Brisbane sperm donor Alan Phan investigated by VARTA after fathering 23 children. www.7news.com (accessed 21 January 2021).Google Scholar
McNair, R., & Dempsey, D. (2002). Exploring diversity in lesbian-parented families Paper 1: Family formation and women’s roles. Family Matters, (63), 40–49.Google Scholar
Mohr, S. (2014). Beyond motivation: On what it means to be a sperm donor in Denmark, Anthropology & Medicine, 21(2), 162–173. DOI: 10.1080/13648470.2014.914806Google Scholar
Power, J., Dempsey, D., Kelly, F., & Lau, M. (2020). Use of fertility services in Australian lesbian, bisexual and queer women’s pathways to parenthood. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 60(4), 610–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13175Google Scholar
Power, J., Perlesz, A., McNair, R., Schofield, M., Pitts, M., Brown, R., & Bickerdike, A. (2012) Gay and bisexual dads and diversity: Fathers in the Work, Love, Play study, Journal of Family Studies, 18(2–3), 143–154, DOI: 10.5172/jfs.2012.18.2-3.143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggs, D. W. (2008a). Lesbian mothers, gay sperm donors, and community: Ensuring the well-being of children and families. Health Sociology Review, 17(3), 226–234.Google Scholar
Riggs, D. W. (2008b). Using multinomial logistic regression analysis to develop a model of Australian gay and heterosexual sperm donors’ motivations and beliefs. International Journal of Emerging Technologies & Society, 6(2), 107–123.Google Scholar
Riggs, D. W. & Russell, L. (2011). Characteristics of men willing to act as sperm donors in the context of identity-release legislation. Human Reproduction, 26(1), 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq314Google Scholar
Riggs, D. W., & Scholz, B. (2011). The value and meaning attached to genetic relatedness among Australian sperm donors. New Genetics and Society, 30(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2011.552299Google Scholar
Sams, L. (2021, 5 February). Meet the father of 17 who leads Australia’s private sperm donor group. Australian Financial Mail. www.afm.com.au (accessed 24 February 2021).Google Scholar
Sixty Minutes Australia (2019, 18 February). Sperm donor plans to father 2500 children. www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGhbcTGZmkI.Google Scholar
Van den Broeck, U., Vandermeeran, M., Vanderschuren, D., Enzlin, P., Demyttenaere, K., & D’Hooghe, T. (2012). A systematic review of sperm donors: Demographic characteristics, attitudes, motives and experiences of the process of sperm donation. Human Reproduction Update, 19, 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dms039Google Scholar
Victorian Reproductive Assistance Authority (VARTA). (2018). Annual report. https://varta.org.au/sites/default/files/2020-11/VARTA%20annual%20report%202018.pdfGoogle Scholar
Victorian Assisted Reproductive Treatment Authority (VARTA). (2020). Annual report. https://varta.org.au/sites/default/files/2021-01/varta-annual-report-2020.pdf.pdfGoogle Scholar
Woestenburg, N., Winter, H., & Janssens, P. (2016). What motivates men to offer sperm donation via the Internet? Psychology Health Medicine, 21(4), 424–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2015.1081702Google Scholar
Whyte, S. (2019). Clinical vs. exclusively online sperm donors: What’s the difference? Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 37(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2018.1540864Google Scholar
Whyte, S., Savage, D., & Torgler, B. (2017). Online sperm donors: The impact of family, friends, personality and risk perception on behaviour. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 35(6), 723–732. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.08.023Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by