Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T03:40:01.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 3 - The Role of the Public in Emergencies: Survivors, Bystanders, and Volunteers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2024

Richard Williams
Affiliation:
University of South Wales
Verity Kemp
Affiliation:
Independent Health Emergency Planning Consultant
Keith Porter
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Tim Healing
Affiliation:
Worshipful Society of Apothecaries of London
John Drury
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Major Incidents, Pandemics and Mental Health
The Psychosocial Aspects of Health Emergencies, Incidents, Disasters and Disease Outbreaks
, pp. 135 - 186
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Quarantelli, EL. The sociology of panic. In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences (eds Smelser, NJ, Baltes, PB):11020-3. Pergamon Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Quarantelli, EL. Images of withdrawal behavior in disasters: some basic misconceptions. Soc Probl 1960; 8: 6879.Google Scholar
Alexander, DE. Misconception as a barrier to teaching about disasters. Prehosp Disaster Med 2007; 22: 95103.Google Scholar
Drury, J. The role of social identity processes in mass emergency behaviour: an integrative review. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 2018; 29: 3881.Google Scholar
Proulx, G, Sime, JD. To prevent ‘panic’ in an underground emergency: why not tell people the truth? Fire Safety Sci 1991; 3: 843–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drury, J, Carter, H, Cocking, C, Ntontis, E, Tekin Guven, S, Amlôt, R. Facilitating collective psychosocial resilience in the public in emergencies: twelve recommendations based on the social identity approach. Front Public Health 2019; 7: 141.Google Scholar
Fritz, CE. Disasters and Mental Health: Therapeutic Principles Drawn from Disaster Studies. Disaster Research Center, 1996.Google Scholar
Glass, TA, Schoch-Spana, M. Bioterrorism and the people: how to vaccinate a city against panic. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 34: 217–23.Google Scholar
HM Government. Community Resilience Development Framework. HM Government, 2019 (www.gov.uk/government/publications/community-resilience-development-framework).Google Scholar
Drury, J, Novelli, D, Stott, C. Representing crowd behaviour in emergency planning guidance: ‘mass panic’ or collective resilience? Resilience 2013; 1: 1837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaniasty, K, Norris, FH. In search of altruistic community: patterns of social support mobilization following Hurricane Hugo. Am J Community Psychol 1995; 23: 447–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dinh, NC, Ubukata, F, Tan, NQ, Ha, VH. How do social connections accelerate post-flood recovery? Insights from a survey of rural households in central Vietnam. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2021; 61: 102342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R, Ntontis, E, Alfadhli, K, Drury, J, Amlôt, R. A social model of secondary stressors in relation to disasters, major incidents and conflict: implications for practice. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2021; 63: 102436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, C, Jetten, J, Cruwys, T, Dingle, GA, Haslam, SA. The New Psychology of Health: Unlocking the Social Cure. Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar
Hopkins, N, Reicher, S, Stevenson, C, Pandey, K, Shankar, S, Tewari, S. Social relations in crowds: recognition, validation and solidarity. Eur J Soc Psychol 2019; 49: 1283–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, SA. Psychology in Organizations 2nd ed. Sage, 2012.Google Scholar
Ntontis, E, Drury, J, Amlôt, R, Rubin, GJ, Williams, R, Saavedra, P. Collective resilience in the disaster recovery period: emergent social identity and observed social support are associated with collective efficacy, well‐being, and the provision of social support. Br J Soc Psychol 2020; 60: 2075–95.Google ScholarPubMed
NATO/EAPC. Psychosocial Care for People Affected by Disasters and Major Incidents: A Model for Designing, Delivering and Managing Psychosocial Services for People Involved in Major Incidents, Conflict, Disasters and Terrorism. NATO/EAPC, 2009.Google Scholar
Carter, H, Drury, J, Rubin, GJ, Williams, R, Amlôt, R. Applying crowd psychology to develop recommendations for the management of mass decontamination. Health Secur 2015; 13: 4553.Google Scholar
Fritz, CE, Mathewson, JH. Convergence Behavior in Disasters: A Problem in Social Control. National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, 1957.Google Scholar
Solnit, R. A Paradise Built in Hell: The Extraordinary Communities That Arise in Disaster. Penguin, 2009.Google Scholar
Williams, R, Kaufman, KR. Narrative review of the COVID-19, healthcare and healthcarers thematic series. BJPsych Open 2022; 8: e34.Google Scholar

References

Summerfield, D. The invention of post-traumatic stress disorder and the social usefulness of a psychiatric category. BMJ 2001; 322: 95–8.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. American Psychiatric Association, 2013.Google Scholar
Charuvastra, A, Cloitre, M. 2008. Social bonds and posttraumatic stress disorder. Annu Rev Psychol 2008; 59: 301–28.Google Scholar
Tedeschi, RG, Calhoun, L. Posttraumatic growth: a new perspective on psychotraumatology. Psychiatric Times 2004; 21: 5860.Google Scholar
Nemeroff, CB, Bremner, JD, Foa, EB, Mayberg, HS, North, CS, Stein, MB. Posttraumatic stress disorder: a state-of-the-science review. J Psychiatr Res 2006; 40: 121.Google Scholar
Bisson, JI, Roberts, NP, Andrew, M, Cooper, R, Lewis, C. Psychological therapies for chronic post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2013: CD003388.Google Scholar
Borek, AJ, Abraham, C, Smith, JR, Greaves, CJ, Tarrant, M. A checklist to improve reporting of group-based behaviour-change interventions. BMC Public Health 2015; 15: 963.Google Scholar
Krupnik, V. Trauma or adversity? Traumatology 2019; 25: 256.Google Scholar
Haslam, SA, Reicher, S. Stressing the group: social identity and the unfolding dynamics of responses to stress. J Appl Psychol 2006; 91: 1037.Google Scholar
Marmot, M. The health gap: the challenge of an unequal world. Lancet 2015; 386: 2442–4.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, RG, Pickett, KE. Income inequality and population health: a review and explanation of the evidence. Soc Sci Med 2006; 62: 1768–84.Google Scholar
Haslam, C, Jetten, J, Cruwys, T, Dingle, GA, Haslam, SA. The New Psychology of Health: Unlocking the Social Cure. Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar
Muldoon, OT, Lowe, RD, Jetten, J, Cruwys, T, Haslam, SA. Personal and political: post‐traumatic stress through the lens of social identity, power, and politics. Polit Psychol 2021; 42: 501–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitt, MT, Branscombe, NR, Postmes, T, Garcia, A. The consequences of perceived discrimination for psychological well-being: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull 2014; 140: 921.Google Scholar
Muldoon, OT, Lowe, RD. Social identity, groups, and post‐traumatic stress disorder. Polit Psychol 2012; 33: 259–73.Google Scholar
Muldoon, OT. Understanding the impact of political violence in childhood: a theoretical review using a social identity approach. Clin Psychol Rev 2013; 33: 929–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung, RY, Dong, D, Li, MM. Socioeconomic gradient in health and the covid-19 outbreak. BMJ 2020; 369: m1329.Google Scholar
Atchison, C, Bowman, L, Eaton, J, Imai, N, Redd, R, Pristera, P. et al. Report 10: Public Response to UK Government Recommendations on COVID-19: Population Survey, 17–18 March 2020. Imperial College London, 2020.Google Scholar
Muldoon, OT, Acharya, K, Jay, S, Adhikari, K, Pettigrew, J, Lowe, RD. Community identity and collective efficacy: a social cure for traumatic stress in post‐earthquake Nepal. Eur J Soc Psychol 2017; 47: 904–15.Google Scholar
Agaibi, CE, Wilson, JP. Trauma, PTSD, and resilience: a review of the literature. Trauma Violence Abuse 2005; 6: 195216.Google Scholar
Killgore, WD, Taylor, EC, Cloonan, SA, Dailey, NS. Psychological resilience during the COVID-19 lockdown. Psychiatry Res 2020; 291: 113216.Google Scholar
Schmid, K, Muldoon, OT. Perceived threat, social identification, and psychological well-being: the effects of political conflict exposure. Polit Psychol 2015; 36: 7592.Google Scholar
Muldoon, OT, Downes, C. Social identification and post-traumatic stress symptoms in post-conflict Northern Ireland. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 191: 146–9.Google Scholar
Drury, J, Brown, R, González, R, Miranda, D. Emergent social identity and observing social support predict social support provided by survivors in a disaster: solidarity in the 2010 Chile earthquake. Eur J Soc Psychol 2016; 46: 209–23.Google Scholar
Haslam, SA. Psychology in Organizations. Sage, 2004.Google Scholar
Wang, K, Dovidio, JF. Perceiving and confronting sexism: the causal role of gender identity salience. Psychol Women Q 2017; 41: 6576.Google Scholar
Schmitt, MT, Davies, K, Hung, M, Wright, SC. Identity moderates the effects of Christmas displays on mood, self-esteem, and inclusion. J Exp Soc Psychol 2010; 46: 1017–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiAngelo, R. White Fragility: Why It’s So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism. Beacon Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Jay, S, Muldoon, OT. Social class and models of agency: independent and interdependent agency as educational (dis)advantage. J Commun Appl Soc Psychol 2018; 28: 318–31.Google Scholar
Stephens, NM, Fryberg, SA, Markus, HR, Johnson, CS, Covarrubias, R. Unseen disadvantage: how American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. J Pers Soc Psychol 2012; 102: 1178–97.Google Scholar
Foran, AM, Roth, J, Jay, S, Griffin, SM, Maher, PJ, McHugh, C, et al. Solidarity matters: prototypicality and minority and majority adherence to national COVID-19 Health Advice. Int Rev Soc Psychol 2021; 34: 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearns, M, Muldoon, OT, Msetfi, RM, Surgenor, PW. Darkness into light? Identification with the crowd at a suicide prevention fundraiser promotes well‐being amongst participants. Eur J Soc Psychol 2017; 47: 878–88.Google Scholar
Lee, E, Bowles, K. Navigating treatment recommendations for PTSD: a rapid review. Int J Ment Health 2023: 52: 444.Google Scholar
Hobfoll, SE. The influence of culture, community, and the nested‐self in the stress process: advancing conservation of resources theory. Appl Psychol 2001; 50: 337421.Google Scholar
Heath, NM, Hall, BJ, Canetti, D, Hobfoll, SE. Exposure to political violence, psychological distress, resource loss, and benefit finding as predictors of domestic violence among Palestinians. Psychol Trauma 2013; 5: 366–76.Google Scholar
Kinnvall, C. Globalization and religious nationalism: self, identity, and the search for ontological security. Polit Psychol 2004; 25: 741–67.Google Scholar
Muldoon, OT, Haslam, SA, Haslam, C, Cruwys, T, Kearns, M, Jetten, J. The social psychology of responses to trauma: social identity pathways associated with divergent traumatic responses. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 2019; 30: 311–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, C. Latilla, T, Muldoon, O, Cruwys, T, Kearns, M. Multiple group membership supports resilience and growth in response to violence and abuse. J Commun Appl Soc Psychol 2021; 32: 241–57.Google Scholar
Jay, S. Winterburn, M, Jha, J, Sah, AK, Choudhary, R, Muldoon, OT. A resilience building collaboration: a social identity empowerment approach to trauma management in leprosy-affected communities. Psychol Trauma 2022; 14: 940–47.Google Scholar

References

Bonanno, GA, Brewin, CR, Kaniasty, K, Greca, AML. Weighing the costs of disaster: consequences, risks, and resilience in individuals, families, and communities. Psychol Sci Public Interest 2010; 11: 149.Google Scholar
Hobfoll, SE, Stokes, JP. The process and mechanics of social support. In The Handbook of Research in Personal Relationships (eds Duck, S, Fray, DF, Hobfoll, SE, Ickes, B, Montgomery, B): 497517. Wiley, 1988.Google Scholar
Kaniasty, K, Norris, FH. Distinctions that matter: received social support, perceived social support, and social embeddedness after disasters. In Mental Health and Disasters (eds Neria, Y, Galea, S, Norris, FH): 175202. Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, AM. Communities in Disaster. Doubleday, 1969.Google Scholar
Kaniasty, K, Norris, FH. In search of altruistic community: patterns of social support mobilization following Hurricane Hugo. Am J Community Psychol 1995; 23: 447–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norris, FH, Baker, CK, Murphy, AD, Kaniasty, K. Social support mobilization and deterioration after Mexico’s 1999 flood: effects of context, gender, and time. Am J Community Psychol 2005; 36: 1528.Google Scholar
Kaniasty, KI, Norris, FH. Help-seeking comfort and receiving social support: the role of ethnicity and context of need. Am J Community Psychol 2000: 28: 545–81.Google Scholar
Vezzali, L, Versari, A, Cadamuro, A, Trifiletti, E, Di Bernardo, GA. Out-group threats and distress as antecedents of common in-group identity among majority and minority group members in the aftermath of a natural disaster. Int J Psychol 2018; 53: 417–25.Google Scholar
Suar, D, Sekhar Das, S, Alat, P, Kumar, R. Exposure, loss, and support predicting the dimensions of posttsunami trauma. J Loss Trauma 2017; 22: 427–39.Google Scholar
Fritz, CE. Disasters. In Contemporary Social Problems (eds Merton, RK, Nisbet, RA): 561–94. Harcourt, 1961.Google Scholar
Littleton, H, Haney, L, Schoemann, A, Allen, A, Benight, C. Received support in the aftermath of Hurricane Florence: reciprocal relations among perceived support, community solidarity, and PTSD. Anxiety Stress Coping 2022; 35: 270–83.Google Scholar
Kaniasty, K. Predicting social psychological well-being following trauma: the role of postdisaster social support. Psychol Trauma 2012; 4: 2233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, JM, Lowe, SR, Galea, S, Norris, FH, Koenen, KC. A longitudinal study of the bidirectional relationship between social support and posttraumatic stress following a natural disaster: postdisaster social support and traumatic stress. J Trauma Stress 2016; 29: 205–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnberg, FK, Hultman, CM, Michel, P-O, Lundin, T. Social support moderates posttraumatic stress and general distress after disaster: buffering role of social support. J Trauma Stress 2012; 25: 721–7.Google Scholar
McGuire, AP, Gauthier, JM, Anderson, LM, Hollingsworth, DW, Tracy, M, Galea, S, et al. Social support moderates effects of natural disaster exposure on depression and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms: effects for displaced and nondisplaced residents: social support moderates natural disaster effects. J Trauma Stress 2018; 31: 223–33.Google Scholar
Warner, LM, Gutiérrez-Doña, B, Villegas Angulo, M, Schwarzer, R. Resource loss, self-efficacy, and family support predict posttraumatic stress symptoms: a 3-year study of earthquake survivors. Anxiety Stress Coping 2015; 28: 239–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, BJ, Sou, K, Chen, W, Zhou, F, Chang, K, Latkin, C. An evaluation of the buffering effects of types and sources of support on depressive symptoms among natural disaster-exposed Chinese adults. Psychiatry 2016; 79: 389402.Google Scholar
Shang, F, Kaniasty, K, Cowlishaw, S, Wade, D, Ma, H, Forbes, D. The impact of received social support on posttraumatic growth after disaster: the importance of both support quantity and quality. Psychol Trauma 2022; 14: 1134–41.Google Scholar
Pandit, A, Nakagawa, Y. How does reciprocal exchange of social support alleviate individuals’ depression in an earthquake-damaged community? Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18: 1585.Google Scholar
Kaniasty, K, Norris, FH. A test of the social support deterioration model in the context of natural disaster. J Pers Soc Psychol 1993; 64: 395408.Google Scholar
Lowe, SR, Chan, CS, Rhodes, JE. Pre-hurricane perceived social support protects against psychological distress: a longitudinal analysis of low-income mothers. J Consult Clin Psychol 2010; 78: 551–60.Google Scholar
Norris, FH, Kaniasty, K. Received and perceived social support in times of stress: a test of the social support deterioration deterrence model. J Pers Soc Psychol 1996; 71: 498511.Google Scholar
Shiba, K, Yazawa, A, Kino, S, Kondo, K, Aida, J, Kawachi, I. Depressive symptoms in the aftermath of major disaster: empirical test of the social support deterioration model using natural experiment. Wellbeing Space Soc 2020; 1: 100006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaniasty, K, Norris, FH. Longitudinal linkages between perceived social support and posttraumatic stress symptoms: sequential roles of social causation and social selection. J Trauma Stress 2008; 21: 274–81.Google Scholar
Lai, BS, Osborne, MC, Piscitello, J, Self-Brown, S, Kelley, ML. The relationship between social support and posttraumatic stress symptoms among youth exposed to a natural disaster. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2018; 9(suppl 2): 1450042.Google Scholar
Weil, F, Lee, MR, Shihadeh, ES. The burdens of social capital: how socially-involved people dealt with stress after Hurricane Katrina. Soc Sci Res 2012; 41: 110–19.Google Scholar
Matsuyama, Y, Aida, J, Hase, A, Sato, Y, Koyama, S, Tsuboya, T, et al. Do community- and individual-level social relationships contribute to the mental health of disaster survivors? A multilevel prospective study after the Great East Japan Earthquake. Soc Sci Med 2016; 151: 187–95.Google Scholar
Gallagher, HC, Block, K, Gibbs, L, Forbes, D, Lusher, D, Molyneaux, R, et al. The effect of group involvement on post-disaster mental health: a longitudinal multilevel analysis. Soc Sci Med 2019; 220: 167–75.Google Scholar
Ursano, RJ, McKibben, JBA, Reissman, DB, Liu, X, Wang, L, Sampson, RJ, et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder and community collective efficacy following the 2004 Florida hurricanes. PLoS One 2014; 9: e88467.Google Scholar
Wong, H, Huang, Y, Fu, Y, Zhang, Y. Impacts of structural social capital and cognitive social capital on the psychological status of survivors of the Ya’an earthquake. Appl Res Qual Life 2019; 14: 1411–33.Google Scholar
Erikson, K. A New Species of Trouble: The Human Experience of Modern Disasters. W.W. Norton & Company, 1994.Google Scholar
Kaniasty, K, Norris, FH. Social support in the aftermath of disasters, catastrophes, and acts of terrorism: altruistic, overwhelmed, uncertain, antagonistic, and patriotic communities. In Bioterrorism: Psychological and Public Health Interventions (eds Ursano, R, Norwood, A, Fullerton, C): 200–29. Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Ritchie, LA, Gill, DA, Long, MA. Factors influencing stress response avoidance behaviors following technological disasters: a case study of the 2008 TVA coal ash spill. Environ Hazards 2020; 19: 442–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cline, RJW, Orom, H, Chung, JE, Hernandez, T. The role of social toxicity in responses to a slowly-evolving environmental disaster: the case of amphibole asbestos exposure in Libby, Montana, USA. Am J Community Psychol 2014; 54: 1227.Google Scholar
Parks, V, Slack, T, Ramchand, R, Drakeford, L, Finucane, ML, Lee, MR. Fishing households, social support, and depression after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Rural Sociol 2020; 85: 495518.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. Psychology and the process of group living. J Soc Psychol 1943; 17: 113–31.Google Scholar

References

Aguirre, BE. Emergency evacuations, panic, and social psychology. Psychiatry 2005; 68: 121–9.Google Scholar
Fritz, CE Disasters and Mental Health: Therapeutic Principles Drawn from Disaster Studies. University of Delaware, Disaster Research Center, 1961/1996 (http://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/1325).Google Scholar
Quarantelli, EL. Panic, sociology of. In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences (eds Smelser, NJ, Baltes, PB): 11020–23. Pergamon Press. 2001.Google Scholar
Jones, E, Woolven, R, Durodie, B, Wessely, S. Civilian morale during the Second World War: responses to air-raids re-examined. Soc Hist Med 2004; 17: 463–79.Google Scholar
Drury, J, Novelli, D, Stott, C. Representing crowd behaviour in emergency planning guidance: ‘mass panic’ or collective resilience? Resilience 2013; 1: 1837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drury, J. The role of social identity processes in mass emergency behaviour: an integrative review. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 2018; 29: 881.Google Scholar
Le Bon, G. The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind (trans. Unwin, FT). Dover Publications Inc., 2002.Google Scholar
Freud, S. Mass psychology and the analysis of the I. In Mass Psychology and Other Writings (ed. Freud, S): 15100. Penguin Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Drury, J, Cocking, C, Reicher, SD. The nature of collective resilience: survivor reactions to the 2005 London bombings. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 2009; 27: 6695.Google Scholar
Drury, J, Cocking, C, Reicher, SD. Everyone for themselves? A comparative study of crowd solidarity among emergency survivors. Br J Soc Psychol 2009; 48: 487506.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H, Turner, JC. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (eds Austin, WG, Worchel, S): 33–7. Brooks/Cole, 1979.Google Scholar
Turner, JC, Hogg, MA. Oakes, PJ, Reicher, SD, Wetherell, MS. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Basil Blackwell, 1987.Google Scholar
Cocking, C. The role of ‘zero-responders’ during 7/7: implications for the emergency services. Int J Emerg Serv 2013; 2: 7993.Google Scholar
Drury, J, Brown, R, González, R, Miranda, D. Emergent social identity and observing social support predict social support provided by survivors in a disaster: solidarity in the 2010 Chile earthquake. Eur J Soc Psychol 2016; 46: 209-223.Google Scholar
Manstead, ASR, Fischer, AH. Social appraisal: the social world as object of and influence on appraisal processes. In Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Research, Application (eds Schere, KR, Schorr, A, Johnstone, T): 221–32. Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Bruder, M, Fischer, A, Manstead, ASR. Social appraisal as a cause of collective emotions. In Collective Emotions (eds von Scheve, C, Salmela, M): 141–55. Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Hogg, MA. A social identity theory of leadership. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2001; 5: 184200.Google Scholar
Alnabulsi, H, Drury, J. Social identification moderates the effect of crowd density on safety at the Hajj. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014; 111: 9091–6.Google Scholar
Levine, M, Prosser, A, Evans, D, Reicher, S. Identity and emergency intervention: how social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behaviour. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2002; 34: 443–53.Google Scholar
Bartolucci, A, Casareale, C, Drury, J. Cooperative and competitive behaviour among passengers during the Costa Concordia disaster. Safety Sci 2021; 134: 105055.Google Scholar
Cocking, C. Crowd flight in response to police dispersal techniques: a momentary lapse of reason? J Invest Psychol Offender Profil 2013; 10: 219–36.Google Scholar
Eyre, A. The value of peer support groups following disaster: from Aberfan to Manchester. Bereave Care 2019; 38: 115–21.Google Scholar
Cabinet Office. National Risk Register 2020. HMSO, 2020.Google Scholar
Faul, M, Aikman, SN, Sasser, SM. Bystander intervention prior to the arrival of emergency medical services: comparing assistance across types of medical emergencies. Prehosp Emerg Care 2016; 20: 317–23.Google Scholar
Blair, JP, Martaindale, MH. United States Active Shooter Events From 2000 to 2010: Training and Equipment Implications. Texas State University, 2013.Google Scholar
Lemyre, L. Public Communication of CBRN Risk in Canada: Research, Training and Tools to Enable. Paper presented at the PIRATE Project Stakeholders Workshop. Health Protection Agency, 2010.Google Scholar
Drury, J, Carter, H, Cocking, C, Ntontis, E, Tekin Guven, S, Amlôt, R. Facilitating collective psychosocial resilience in the public in emergencies: twelve recommendations based on the social identity approach. Front Public Health 2019; 7: 141.Google Scholar
Kerslake, RW. The Kerslake Report: An Independent Review into the Preparedness for, and Emergency Response to, the Manchester Arena Attack on 22nd May 2017. The Kerslake Arena Review, 2018 (www.kerslakearenareview.co.uk/media/1022/kerslake_arena_review_printed_final.pdf).Google Scholar
Hobfoll, S, Watson, P, Bell, C, Bryant, R, Brymer, M, Friedman, M, et al. Five essential elements of immediate and mid-term mass trauma intervention: empirical evidence. Psychiatry 2007; 70: 283315.Google Scholar

References

Drury, J, Carter, H, Cocking, C, Ntontis, E, Guven, ST, Amlot, R. Facilitating collective psychosocial resilience in the public in emergencies: twelve recommendations based on the social identity approach. Front Public Health 2019; 7:141.Google Scholar
Jakubicka, T, Vos, F, Phalkey, R, Marx, M. Health Impacts of Floods in Europe: Data Gaps and Information Needs from a Spatial Perspective. A MICRODIS Report. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters, 2010 (www.preventionweb.net/files/19820_healthimpactsoffloodsineurope1.pdf).Google Scholar
Menne, B, Murray, V, eds. Floods in the WHO European Region: Health Effects and Their Prevention. WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2013.Google Scholar
UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. UNDRR, 2015.Google Scholar
Waite, TD, Chaintarli, K, Beck, CR, Bone, A, Amlôt, R, Kovats, S, et al. The English national cohort study of flooding and health: cross-sectional analysis of mental health outcomes at year one. BMC Public Health 2017; 17: 129.Google Scholar
Jermacane, D, Waite, TD, Beck, CR, Bone, A, Amlôt, R, Reacher, M, et al. The English National Cohort Study of Flooding and Health: the change in the prevalence of psychological morbidity at year two. BMC Public Health 2018; 18: 330.Google Scholar
Williams, R, Ntontis, E, Alfadhli, K, Drury, J, Amlôt, R. A social model of secondary stressors in relation to disasters, major incidents, and conflict: implications for practice. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2021; 63: 102436.Google Scholar
Tempest, EL, English National Study on Flooding and Health Study Group, Carter, B, Beck, CR, Rubin, GJ. Secondary stressors are associated with probable psychological morbidity after flooding: a cross-sectional analysis. Eur J Public Health 2017; 27: 1042–7.Google Scholar
Norris, FH, Stevens, SP, Pfefferbaum, B, Wyche, KF, Pfefferbaum, RL. Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. Am J Community Psychol 2008; 41: 127–50.Google Scholar
Patel, S, Rogers, M, Amlôt, R, Rubin, G. What do we mean by ‘community resilience’? A systematic literature review of how it is defined in the literature. PLoS Curr 2017; 9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.db775aff25efc5ac4f0660ad9c9f7db2.Google Scholar
Twigger-Ross, C, Brooks, K, Papadopoulou, L, Orr, P, Sadauskis, R, Coke, A, et al. Community Resilience to Climate Change: An Evidence Review. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2015.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. The forms of capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (ed. Richardson, JG): 241–58. Bloomsbury, 1986.Google Scholar
Aldrich, DP. The importance of social capital in building community resilience. In Rethinking Resilience, Adaptation and Transformation in a Time of Change (eds Yan, W, Galloway, W): 357–64. Springer, 2017.Google Scholar
Wickes, R, Zahnow, R, Taylor, M, Piquero, AR. Neighborhood structure, social capital, and community resilience: longitudinal evidence from the 2011 Brisbane flood disaster. Soc Sci Q 2015; 96: 330–53.Google Scholar
Shreve, C, Fordham, M. Mobilising resources for resilience. In Framing Community Disaster Resilience: Resources, Capacities, Learning, and Action (eds Deeming, H, Fordham, M, Kuhlicke, C, Pedoth, L, Schneiderbauer, S, Shreve, C): 2742. Wiley-Blackwell, 2019.Google Scholar
Quarantelli, EL. Disaster Related Social Behavior: Summary of 50 Years of Research Findings. University of Delaware Disaster Research Center, 1999.Google Scholar
Uekusa, S. Rethinking resilience: Bourdieu’s contribution to disaster research. Resilience 2017; 6: 181–95.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H, Turner, JC. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (eds Austin, WG, Worchel, S): 33–7. Brooks/Cole, 1979.Google Scholar
Turner, JC, Hogg, MA, Oakes, PJ, Reicher, S, Wetherell, M. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorisation Theory. Blackwell, 1987.Google Scholar
Drury, J. The role of social identity processes in mass emergency behaviour: an integrative review. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 2018; 29: 3881.Google Scholar
Ntontis, E, Drury, J, Amlôt, R, Rubin, GJ, Williams, R. Emergent social identities in floods: implications for community psychosocial resilience. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 2018; 28: 314.Google Scholar
Zhang, ML. The antecedents, consequences and trajectories of shared identity in emergencies and disasters. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of St Andrews, 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17630/sta/25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drury, J, Cocking, C, Reicher, SD. The nature of collective resilience: survivor reactions to the 2005 London bombings. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 2009; 27: 6695.Google Scholar
Fritz, C, Williams, H. The human being in disasters: a research perspective. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 1957; 309: 4251.Google Scholar
Solnit, R. A Paradise Built in Hell: The Extraordinary Communities That Arise in Disaster. Penguin Books, 2009.Google Scholar
Ntontis, E, Drury, J, Amlot, R, Rubin, GJ, Williams, R, Saavedra, P. Collective resilience in the disaster recovery period: emergent social identity and observed social support are associated with collective efficacy, well-being, and the provision of social support. Br J Soc Psychol 2021; 60: 1075–95.Google Scholar
Ntontis, E, Drury, J, Amlôt, R, Rubin, GJ, Williams, R. Endurance or decline of emergent groups following a flood disaster: implications for community resilience. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2020; 45: 101493.Google Scholar
Ntontis, E, Drury, J, Amlôt, R, Rubin, GJ, Williams, R. Community resilience and flooding in UK guidance: a review of concepts, definitions, and their implications. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 2018; 27: 213.Google Scholar
Furedi, F. From the narrative of the Blitz to the Rhetoric of vulnerability. Cult Sociol 2007; 1: 235–54.Google Scholar

References

Costello, A. A Social Vaccine for Ebola. A Lesson for the Democratic Republic of Congo. Anthony Costello, 2018 (www.anthonycostello.net/2018/05/20/a-social-vaccine-for-ebola-a-lesson-for-the-democratic-republic-of-congo/).Google Scholar
Independent, SAGE. Maintaining Adherence to Protective Behaviours During Vaccination Roll-Out. Independent SAGE, 2021 (www.independentsage.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Adverse-behavioural-effects-of-vaccines-7.1.pdf).Google Scholar
Public Health England. Finding the Evidence: Coronavirus. Public Health England, 2021 (https://phelibrary.koha-ptfs.co.uk/coronavirusinformation/).Google Scholar
British Psychological Society. Behavioural Science and Disease Prevention: Psychological Guidance for Optimising Policies and Communication. British Psychological Society, 2020 (www.bps.org.uk/coronavirus-resources/professional/behavioural-science-disease-prevention-psychological-guidance).Google Scholar
Folmer, RC, Kuiper, ME, Olthuis, E, Kooistra, EB, de Bruijn, AL, Brownlee, M, et al. Maintaining Compliance When the Virus Returns: Understanding Adherence to Social Distancing Measures in the Netherlands in July 2020. PsyArXiv, 2020 (https://psyarxiv.com/vx3mn/).Google Scholar
Clark, C, Davila, A, Regis, M, Kraus, S. Predictors of COVID-19 voluntary compliance behaviors: an international investigation. Glob Transit 2020; 2: 7682.Google Scholar
Van Bavel, JJ, Cichocka, A, Capraro, V, Sjåstad, H, Nezlek, JB, Alfano, M, et al. National Identity Predicts Public Health Support during a Global Pandemic: Results from 67 Nations. PsyArXiv, 2020 (https://psyarxiv.com/ydt95/).Google Scholar
Vignoles, VL, Jaser, Z, Taylor, Z, Ntontis, E. Harnessing shared identities to mobilize resilient responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Polit Psychol 2021; 42: 817–26.Google Scholar
Liekefett, L, Becker, J. Compliance with governmental restrictions during the coronavirus pandemic: a matter of personal self‐protection or solidarity with people in risk groups? Br J Soc Psychol 2021; 60: 924–46.Google Scholar
Pfattheicher, S, Nockur, L, Böhm, R, Sassenrath, C, Petersen, MB. The emotional path to action: empathy promotes physical distancing and wearing of face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychol Sci 2020; 31: 1363–73.Google Scholar
Nivette, A, Ribeaud, D, Murray, A, Steinhoff, A, Bechtiger, L, Hepp, U, et al. Non-compliance with COVID-19-related public health measures among young adults in Switzerland: insights from a longitudinal cohort study. Soc Sci Med 2021; 268: 113370.Google Scholar
Van Lissa, CJ, Stroebe, W, van Dellen, M, Leander, P, Agostini, M, Gutzkow, B, et al. Early Indicators of COVID-19 Infection Prevention Behaviors: Machine Learning Identifies Personal and Country-Level Factors. PsyArXiv, 2020 (https://psyarxiv.com/whjsb/).Google Scholar
Tuncgenc, B, El Zein, M, Sulik, J, Newson, M, Zhao, Y, Dezecache, G, et al. Social influence matters: we follow pandemic guidelines most when our close circle does. Br J Psychol 2021; 112: 763–80.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics. Coronavirus and the Social Impacts on Great Britain: 30 April 2021. Office for National Statistics, 2021 (www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/healthandwellbeing/bulletins/coronavirusandthesocialimpactsongreatbritain/30april2021#main-indicators).Google Scholar
Drury, J. Mitigating the New Variant SARS-CoV-2 Virus: How to Support Public Adherence to Physical Distancing. Crowds and Identities, 2020 (https://blogs.sussex.ac.uk/crowdsidentities/2020/12/27/mitigating-the-new-variant-sars-cov-2-virus-how-to-support-public-adherence-to-physical-distancing/).Google Scholar
Smith, LE, Potts, HWW, Amlôt, R, Fear, NT, Michie, S, Rubin, GJ. Adherence to the test, trace, and isolate system in the UK: results from 37 nationally representative surveys. BMJ 2021; 372: n608.Google Scholar
Patel, J, Fernandes, G, Sridhar, D. How can we improve self-isolation and quarantine for covid-19? BMJ 2021; 372: n625.Google Scholar
Butler, P. A million volunteer to help NHS and others during Covid-19 outbreak. The Guardian, 13 April 2020 (www.theguardian.com/society/2020/apr/13/a-million-volunteer-to-help-nhs-and-others-during-covid-19-lockdown).Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics. Executive Summary: Community Life COVID-19 Re-Contact Survey 2020. Office for National Statistics, 2020 (www.gov.uk/government/statistics/community-life-covid-19-re-contact-survey-2020-main-report/executive-summary-community-life-recontact-survey-2020).Google Scholar
Solnit, R. ‘The way we get through this is together’: the rise of mutual aid under coronavirus. The Guardian, 14 May 2020 (www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/14/mutual-aid-coronavirus-pandemic-rebecca-solnit).Google Scholar
Booth, R. Community aid groups set up across UK amid coronavirus crisis. The Guardian, 16 March 2020 (www.theguardian.com/society/2020/mar/16/community-aid-groups-set-up-across-uk-amid-coronavirus-crisis).Google Scholar
Tiratelli, L, Kaye, S. Communities vs. Coronavirus: The Rise of Mutual Aid. New Local, 2020 (www.newlocal.org.uk/publications/communities-vs-coronavirus-the-rise-of-mutual-aid/).Google Scholar
Mao, G, Fernandes-Jesus, M, Ntontis, E, Drury, J. What have we learned about COVID-19 volunteering in the UK? A rapid review of the literature. BMC Public Health 2021; 21: 1470.Google Scholar
Fritz, CE. Disasters and Mental Health: Therapeutic Principles Drawn from Disaster Studies. Disaster Research Center, 1961 (http://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/1325).Google Scholar
Kaniasty, K, Norris, FH. The experience of disaster: individuals and communities sharing trauma. In Response to Disaster: Psychosocial, Community, and Ecological Approaches (eds Gist, R, Lubin, B): 2561. Brunner/Maze, 1999.Google Scholar
McCabe, A, Wilson, M, Paine, AE. Stepping Up and Helping Out: Grassroots Volunteering in Response to COVID-19. Local Trust, 2020.Google Scholar
Haslam, C, Jetten, J, Cruwys, T, Dingle, GA, Haslam, SA. The New Psychology of Health: Unlocking the Social Cure. Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar
Mao, G, Drury, J, Fernandes-Jesus, M, Ntontis, E. How participation in Covid-19 mutual aid groups affects subjective well-being and how political identity moderates these effects. Anal Soc Issues Public Policy 2021; 21: 1082–112.Google Scholar
Gray, D, Stevenson, C. How can ‘we’ help? Exploring the role of shared social identity in the experiences and benefits of volunteering. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 2020; 30: 341–53.Google Scholar
Wakefield, J, Bowe, M, Kellezi, B. Who helps and why? A longitudinal exploration of volunteer role identity, between-group closeness, and community identification as predictors of coordinated helping during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Soc Psychol 2022; 61: 907–23.Google Scholar
Bowe, M, Wakefield, J, Kellezi, B, Stevenson, C, McNamara, N, Jones, B, et al. The mental health benefits of community helping during crisis: coordinated helping, community identification and sense of unity during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 2022; 32: 521–35.Google Scholar
Stevenson, C, Wakefield, JRH, Felsner, I, Drury, J, Costa, S. Collectively coping with coronavirus: local community identification predicts giving support and lockdown adherence during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Soc Psychol 2021; 60: 1403–18.Google Scholar
Robin, C, Symons, C, Carter, H. Rapid thematic analysis of community social and online media in response to mass asymptomatic COVID-19 testing in Liverpool, England. [Preprint] 2021. Available from: www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-370851/v1Google Scholar
Greater London Authority (GLA). The Experience of Mutual Aid in London. GLA, 2020 (https://data.gov.uk/dataset/b8adb6dd-7408-4821-a38e-5b27bdba9b21/the-experience-of-mutual-aid-in-london).Google Scholar

References

Chilcott, RP. Managing mass casualties and decontamination. Environ int 2014; 72: 3745.Google Scholar
Home Office. Initial Operational Response to a CBRN Incident. Home Office, 2015 (www.jesip.org.uk/uploads/media/pdf/CBRN%20JOPs/IOR_Guidance_V2_July_2015.pdf).Google Scholar
Holloway, HC, Norwood, AE, Fullerton, CS, Engel, CC, Ursano, RJ. The threat of biological weapons: prophylaxis and mitigation of psychological and social consequences. JAMA 1997; 278: 425–7.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H, Turner, J. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (eds Austin, WG, Worchel, S): 3347. Wadsworth, 1979.Google Scholar
Turner, JC, Hogg, MA, Oakes, PJ, Reicher, SD, Wetherell, MS. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Basil Blackwell, 1987.Google Scholar
Carter, H, Drury, J, Rubin, GJ, Williams, R, Amlôt, R. Applying crowd psychology to develop recommendations for the management of mass decontamination. Health Secur 2015; 13: 4553.Google Scholar
Reicher, S. The St Pauls riot: an explanation of the limits of crowd action in terms of a social identity model. Eur J Soc Psychol 1984;14: 121.Google Scholar
Stott, C, Reicher, S. How conflict escalates: the inter-group dynamics of collective football crowd violence. Sociology 1998; 32: 353–77.Google Scholar
Drury, J, Cocking, C, Reicher, S. The nature of collective resilience: survivor reactions to the 2005 London bombings. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 2009; 27: 6695.Google Scholar
Carter, H, Drury, J, Amlôt, R. Social identity and intergroup relationships in the management of crowds during mass emergencies and disasters: recommendations for emergency planners and responders. Policing 2020; 14: 931–44.Google Scholar
Le Bon, G. The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. Ernest Benn, 1895.Google Scholar
Carter, H, Drury, J, Rubin, GJ, Williams, R, Amlôt, R. Communication during mass casualty decontamination: highlighting the gaps. Int J Emerg Serv 2013; 2: 2948.Google Scholar
Drury, J, Carter, H, Cocking, C, Ntontis, E, Tekin Guven, S, Amlôt, R. Facilitating collective psychosocial resilience in the public in emergencies: twelve recommendations based on the social identity approach. Front Public Health 2019; 7: 141.Google Scholar
Carter, H, Drury, J, Amlôt, R. Recommendations for improving public engagement with pre-incident information materials for initial response to a chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear (CBRN) incident: a systematic review. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2020; 51: 101796.Google Scholar
Carter, HE, Gauntlett, L, Amlôt, R. Public perceptions of the ‘Remove, Remove, Remove’ information campaign before and during a hazardous materials incident: a survey. Health Secur 2021; 19: 100107.Google Scholar
UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. UNDRR, 2015. (www.preventionweb.net/files/43291_sendaiframeworkfordrren.pdf).Google Scholar
City of London Police. Run Hide Tell. City of London Police, 2017 (www.cityoflondon.police.uk/advice-and-support/counteringterrorism/Pages/stay-safe.aspx).Google Scholar
British Transport Police. New National Rail Security Campaign Starts Today: ‘See it. Say it. Sorted’. British Transport Police, 2016 (www.btp.police.uk/latest_news/see_it_say_it_sorted_new_natio.aspx).Google Scholar
National Ambulance Resilience Unit (NARU). ‘Remove, Remove, Remove’ – refreshed IOR Messaging Released by NARU. NARU, 2018 (https://naru.org.uk/remove-remove-remove-refreshed-ior-messaging-is-released-by-naru/).Google Scholar
Carter, H, Weston, D, Symons, C, Amlot, R. Public perceptions of pre-incident information campaign materials for the initial response to a chemical incident. Disaster Prev Manag 2019; 28. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-10-2018-0342.Google Scholar
Carter, H, Drury, J, Amlôt, R, Rubin, GJ, Williams, R. Effective responder communication improves efficiency and psychological outcomes in a mass decontamination field experiment: implications for public behaviour in the event of a chemical incident. PLoS One 2014; 9: e89846.Google Scholar
Carter, H, Drury, J, Amlôt, R, Rubin, GJ, Williams, R. Effective responder communication, perceived responder legitimacy, and group identification predict public cooperation and compliance in a mass decontamination visualization experiment. J Appl Soc Psychol 2015; 45: 173–89.Google Scholar
Carter, H, Amlôt, R. Mass casualty decontamination guidance and psychosocial aspects of CBRN incident management: a review and synthesis. PLoS Curr 2016; 8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.c2d3d652d9d07a2a620ed5429e017ef5.Google Scholar
Clarke, L. Panic: myth or reality? Contexts 2002; 1: 21–6.Google Scholar
Carter, H, Drury, J, Rubin, GJ, Williams, R, Amlôt, R. Public experiences of mass casualty decontamination. Biosecur Bioterror 2012; 10: 280–89.Google Scholar
Stott, C, Hutchison, P, Drury, J. ‘Hooligans’ abroad? Intergroup dynamics, social identity and participation in collective ‘disorder’ at the 1998 World Cup Finals. Br J Soc Psychol 2001; 40: 359384.Google Scholar
Peters, G-JY, Ruiter, RA, Kok, G. Threatening communication: a critical re-analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory. Health Psychol Rev 2013; 7(suppl 1): S8–31.Google Scholar
Symons, C, Amlôt, R, Carter, H, Rubin, GJ. Effects of threat and efficacy messages on expected adherence to decontamination protocols in an immersive simulated chemical incident: a randomized controlled experiment. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 2021; 29: 5476.Google Scholar
Drury, J. Collective resilience in mass emergencies and disasters: a social identity model. In The Social Cure: Identity, Health, and Well-Being (eds Jetten, J, Haslam, C, Haslam, SA): 195215. Psychology Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Haslam, C, Reicher, S. Stressing the group: social identity and the unfolding dynamics of responses to stress. J Appl Psychol 2006; 91: 1037–52.Google Scholar
Drury, J, Cocking, C, Reicher, S, Burton, A, Schofield, D, Hardwick, A, et al. Cooperation versus competition in a mass emergency evacuation: a new laboratory simulation and a new theoretical model. Behav Res Methods 2009; 41, 957–70.Google Scholar
Carter, H, Drury, J, Amlôt, R, Rubin, GJ, Williams, R. Perceived responder legitimacy and group identification predict cooperation and compliance in a mass decontamination field exercise. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 2013; 35: 575–85.Google Scholar

References

Tekin, S, Drury, J. How do those affected by a disaster organize to meet their needs for justice? Campaign strategies and partial victories following the Grenfell Tower fire. J Soc Polit Psychol 2023; 11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.8567.Google Scholar
Bowe, M, Wakefield, JRH, Kellezi, B, et al. The mental health benefits of community helping during crisis: coordinated helping, community identification and sense of unity during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 2021; 32: 521–35.Google Scholar
Solnit, R. A Paradise Built in Hell: The Extraordinary Communities That Arise in Disaster. Penguin, 2010.Google Scholar
Tekin, S, Drury, J. Silent Walk as a street mobilization: campaigning following the Grenfell Tower fire. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 2021; 31: 425–37.Google Scholar
Templeton, A, Tekin Guven, S, Hoerst, C, Vestergren, S, Davidson, L, Ballentyne, S, et al. Inequalities and identity processes in crises: recommendations for facilitating safe response to the COVID‐19 pandemic. Br J Soc Psychol 2020; 59: 674–85.Google Scholar
Drury, J, Reicher, S, Stott, C. COVID‐19 in context: why do people die in emergencies? It’s probably not because of collective psychology. Br J Soc Psychol 2020; 59: 686–93.Google Scholar
Iacobucci, G. Covid-19: increased risk among ethnic minorities is largely due to poverty and social disparities. BMJ 2020; 371: m4099.Google Scholar
Ntontis, E, Drury, J, Amlot, R, Rubin, GJ, Williams, R. Endurance or decline of emergent groups following a flood disaster: implications for community resilience. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2020; 45: 19.Google Scholar
Renwick, D. Organizing in mute. In: After Grenfell (eds Bulley, D, Edkins, J, El-Elnany, N): 1946. Pluto Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Bulley, D. Everyday life and death in the global city. In After Grenfell (eds Bulley, D, Edkins, J, El-Elnany, N): 118. Pluto Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Charles, M. Come unity and community in the face of impunity. In After Grenfell (eds Bulley, D, Edkins, J, El-Enany, N): 167–93. Pluto Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Klavina, L, van Zomeren, M. Protesting to protect ‘us’ and/or ‘them’? Explaining why members of third groups are willing to engage in collective action. Group Processes Intergroup Relat 2020; 23: 140–60.Google Scholar
Saab, R, Tausch, N, Spears, R, Cheung, WY. Acting in solidarity: testing an extended dual pathway model of collective action by bystander group members. Br J Soc Psychol 2015; 54: 539–60.Google Scholar
Fattori, F, Pozzi, M, Marzana, D, Mannarini, T. A proposal for an integrated model of prosocial behavior and collective action as the expression of global citizenship. Eur J Soc Psychol 2015; 45: 907–17.Google Scholar
Mallett, RK, Huntsinger, JR, Sinclair, S, Swim, JK. Seeing through their eyes: when majority group members take collective action on behalf of an outgroup. Group Processes Intergroup Relat 2008; 11: 451–70.Google Scholar
Reicher, S, Cassidy, C, Wolpert, I, Hopkins, N, Levine, M. Saving Bulgaria’s Jews: an analysis of social identity and the mobilisation of social solidarity. Eur J Soc Psychol 2006; 36: 4972.Google Scholar
Selvanathan, HP, Lickel, B, Dasgupta, N. An integrative framework on the impact of allies: how identity-based needs influence intergroup solidarity and social movements. Eur J Soc Psychol 2020; 50: 1344–61.Google Scholar
Roblain, A, Hanioti, M, Paulis, E, Van Haute, E, Green, EGT. The social network of solidarity with migrants: the role of perceived injunctive norms on intergroup helping behaviors. Eur J Soc Psychol 2020; 50: 1306–17.Google Scholar
Gordijn, EH, Yzerbyt, V, Wigboldus, D, Dumont, M. Emotional reactions to harmful intergroup behavior. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2006; 36: 1530.Google Scholar
Ntontis, E, Drury, J, Amlôt, R, Rubin, GJ, Williams, R. Emergent social identities in a flood: implications for community psychosocial resilience. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 2018; 28: 314.Google Scholar
Levine, M, Prosser, A, Evans, D, Reicher, S. Identity and emergency intervention: how social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2005; 31: 443–53.Google Scholar
Zagefka, H. Prosociality during COVID-19: globally focussed solidarity brings greater benefits than nationally focussed solidarity. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 2022; 32: 7386.Google Scholar
Drury, J. The role of social identity processes in mass emergency behaviour: an integrative review. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 2018; 29: 3881.Google Scholar
Zagefka, H. Intergroup helping during the coronavirus crisis: effects of group identification, ingroup blame and third party outgroup blame. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 2020; 33: 8393.Google Scholar
James, TK, Zagefka, H. The effects of group memberships of victims and perpetrators in humanly caused disasters on charitable donations to victims. J Appl Soc Psychol 2017; 47: 446–58.Google Scholar
Halabi, S, Dovidio, JF, Nadler, A. When intergroup helping helps intergroup relations: the moderating role of trust in the outgroup. J Exp Soc Psychol 2021; 95: 104141.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, E, Zagefka, H, eds. Intergroup Helping. Springer, 2017.Google Scholar
Thomas, EF, Smith, LG, McGarty, C, Reese, G, Kende, A, Bliuc, AM, et al. When and how social movements mobilize action within and across nations to promote solidarity with refugees. Eur J Soc Psychol 2019; 49: 213–29.Google Scholar
Shnabel, N, Noor, M. Competitive victimhood among Jewish and Palestinian Israelis reflects differential threats to their identities: the perspective of the needs-based model. In Social Issues and Interventions. Restoring Civil Societies: The Psychology of Intervention and Engagement Following Crisis (eds Jonas, KJ, Morton, TA): 192207. Wiley Blackwell, 2012.Google Scholar
Burson, E, Godfrey, EB. Intraminority solidarity: the role of critical consciousness. Eur J Soc Psychol 2020; 50: 1362–77.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×