Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T00:34:43.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2015

Emily B. Laidlaw
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Regulating Speech in Cyberspace
Gatekeepers, Human Rights and Corporate Responsibility
, pp. 287 - 315
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

AccountAbility 1000S (AA1000S), at www.accountability.org/Google Scholar
Advertising Standards Authority, at www.asa.org.ukGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe, Recommendation CM/Rec(2012)3 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the protection of human rights with regard to search enginesGoogle Scholar
Electronic Industry Code of Conduct, at www.eicc.info/eicc_code.shtmlGoogle Scholar
Equality and Human Rights Commission, A Guide to Business and Human Rights (March 2013), at www.equalityhumanrights.com/private-and-public-sector-guidance/organisations-and-businesses/businesses/human-rights-matterGoogle Scholar
European Commission, ICT Sector Guide on Implementing the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (drafted by Shift and the Institute for Human Rights and Business)Google Scholar
European Commission, My Business and Human Rights: a guide to human rights for small and medium-sized enterprises, at http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/files/csr-sme/human-rights-sme-guide-final_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Facebook’s ‘Community Standards’, at www.facebook.com/communitystandardsGoogle Scholar
The Forest Stewardship Council, at www.fsc.org/Google Scholar
Freiwillige Selbstokontrolle Multimedia-Diensteanbieter (Association for the Voluntary Self-Monitoring of Multimedia Service Providers), ‘Subcode of Conduct for Search Engine Providers’Google Scholar
The Global e-Sustainability Initiative, at http://gesi.orgGoogle Scholar
The Global Network Initiative, at www.globalnetworkinitiative.org/Google Scholar
The Global Reporting Initiative, at www.globalreporting.org/HomeGoogle Scholar
Google, Blogger Terms of Service, at www.blogger.com/terms.gGoogle Scholar
ICANN, Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy, at www.icann.org/en/udrp/udrp.htmGoogle Scholar
The International Labour Organisation, at www.ilo.org/global/lang–en/index.htmGoogle Scholar
International Standards ISO/DIS 26000, Social Responsibility, at www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:26000:ed-1:v1:enGoogle Scholar
ISPA, Best Current Practice on Blocking and filtering of Internet Traffic, at www.ispa.org.uk/home/page_327.htmlGoogle Scholar
Lord Macdonald of River Glaven, QC, ‘A human rights audit of the Internet Watch Foundation’, available at www.iwf.org.uk/accountability/human-rights-auditGoogle Scholar
Memorandum of Understanding between the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) concerning Section 46 Sexual Offences Act 2003Google Scholar
Nominet’s Dispute Resolution Service, at www.nominet.org.uk/disputes/drs/Google Scholar
Ofcom, Customer Codes of Practice for handling complaints and resolving disputes (May 2005)Google Scholar
Ofcom, ‘Online Infringement of Copyright and the Digital Economy Act 2010: Draft Initial Obligations Code’, at http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/copyright-infringement/summary/condoc.pdfGoogle Scholar
Principles for Responsible Investment, at www.unpri.orgGoogle Scholar
The Telecommunications Industry Dialogue on Freedom of Expression and Privacy, Guiding Principles, version 1 (March 6 2013), at www.telecomindustrydialogue.org/sites/default/files/Telecoms_Industry_Dialogue_Principles_Version_1_-_ENGLISH.pdfGoogle Scholar
United Nations Global Compact, ‘The Ten Principles’, at www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/TheTenPrinciples/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
World Intellectual Property Organization, Arbitration and Mediation Center, at www.wipo.int/amc/en/index.htmlGoogle Scholar

Secondary Sources

Emails between Emily Laidlaw and Nielsen, Lene, Communications Executive and Webmaster Internet Watch Foundation (March–April 2010), on file with the author.Google Scholar
Google’s Notion of Motion and Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, and Memorandum of Points, 2006 WL 1232481 for Kinderstart.com LLC et al. v. Google Inc., Case 5:06-cv-02057-JF (2007) (DC N.Cali).Google Scholar
The U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Human Rights and the law, ‘Global Internet Freedom and the Rule of Law, Part II’ (2010).Google Scholar
The U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Human Rights and the law, ‘Global Internet Freedom: Corporate Responsibility and the Law’ (2008).Google Scholar
The Leveson Inquiry, An Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press (November 2012).Google Scholar
Leveson Inquiry, evidence of Keller, Daphne, at www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Q2L9fWnb8IGoogle Scholar
Akdeniz, Y.Internet Child Pornography and the Law (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008).Google Scholar
Auletta, K.Googled: The End of the World as We Know It (London: Virgin Books, 2010).Google Scholar
Ayres, I., and Braithwaite, J.. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate (Oxford University Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R., and Cave, M.. Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Balkan, J.The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power (London: Constable and Robinson Ltd., 2005).Google Scholar
Barendt, E.Freedom of Speech, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Benedek, W., and Kettemann, M. C.. Freedom of Expression and the Internet (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2013).Google Scholar
Benkler, Y.The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom (Yale University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Bernal, P.Internet Privacy Rights: Rights to Protect Autonomy (Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blowfield, M., and Murray, A.. Corporate Responsibility: A Critical Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J., and Drahos, P.. Global Business Regulation (Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand, S.The Media Lab: Inventing the Future at MIT (New York: Penguin Group, 1987).Google Scholar
Castells, M.The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society (Oxford University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castells, M.The Rise of the Network Society, 2nd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000).Google Scholar
Citron, D. K.Hate Crimes in Cyberspace (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapham, A.Human Rights in the Private Sphere (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, R., and Tomlinson, H.. The Law of Human Rights, 2nd edn, vol. 1 (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Coffee, J. C.Gatekeepers: The Role of the Professions in Corporate Governance (Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. A.Democracy and Its Critics (Yale University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Donnelly, J.Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice, 2nd edn (Cornell University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
de Sola Pool, I.Technologies of Freedom (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, T. I.The System of Freedom of Expression (New York: Random House, 1970).Google Scholar
Feintuck, M., and Varney, M.. Media Regulation, Public Interest and the Law (Edinburgh University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Fenwick, H., and Phillipson, Gavin. Media Freedom under the Human Rights Act (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Fiske, J.Television Culture (London: Routledge, 1987).Google Scholar
Friedman, M.Capitalism and Freedom (University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Gearty, C.Principles of Human Rights Adjudication (Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Habermas, J.Between Facts and Norms (MIT, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J., Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Habermas, J.Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (Translated Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Habermas, J.The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (Translated Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Harris, D. J. et al. Law of European Convention on Human Rights, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Heald, M.The Social Responsibilities of Business: Company and Community, 1900–1960 (Cleveland, OH: Press of Case Western Reserve University, 1970).Google Scholar
Jørgensen, R. F.Framing the Net: The Internet and Human Rights (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keen, A.The Cult of the Amateur (London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing, 2007).Google Scholar
Lessig, L.Code: Version 2.0 (New York: Basic Books, 2006).Google Scholar
Lessig, L.Code and other Laws of Cyberspace (New York: Basic Books, 1999).Google Scholar
Lord Lester of Herne Hill et al. Human Rights Law and Practice (London: Butterworths, 1999).Google Scholar
Lozano, J. M. et al. Governments and Corporate Social Responsibility: Public Policies beyond Regulation and Voluntary Compliance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, H. et al, Investigating the Information Society (London: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
MacKinnon, R.Consent of the Networked: The Worldwide Struggle for Internet Freedom (New York: Basic Books, 2012).Google Scholar
Marsden, C.Internet Co-Regulation: European Law, Regulatory Governance and Legitimacy in Cyberspace (Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer-Shönberger, V.Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age (Princeton University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Morgan, B., and Yeung, K.. An Introduction to Law and Regulation: Text and Materials (Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morozov, E.The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom (New York: Public Affairs, 2011).Google Scholar
Morsink, J.The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Origins, Drafting & Intent (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, A.Information Technology Law: The Law and Society (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Negroponte, N.Being Digital (New York: Vintage Books, 1995).Google Scholar
Norris, P.Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide (Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prosser, T.The Regulatory Enterprise: Government, Regulation, and Legitimacy (Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, J.Holding Corporations Accountable: Corporate Conduct, International Codes, and Citizen Action (London: Zed Books Ltd, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, J.Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2013).Google Scholar
Shoemaker, P.Gatekeeping (Communication Concepts) (Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991).Google Scholar
Shoemaker, P.Gatekeeping Theory (New York: Routledge, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. K. M.International Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R.Infotopia (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R.Republic.com (Princeton University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R.Republic.com 2.0 (Princeton University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Tambini, D. et al. Codifying Cyberspace (London: Routledge, 2008).Google Scholar
van Hoboken, J.Search Engine Freedom: On the Implications of the Right to Freedom of Expression for the Legal Governance of Web Search Services (Amsterdam: Kluwer Law International, 2012).Google Scholar
Wales, A.Big Business, Big Responsibilities (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, G. J.Human Rights in an Information Age: A Philosophical Analysis (University of Toronto Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, R. L.From Gutenberg to the Internet: Free Speech, Advancing Technology, and the Implications for Democracy (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Weber, R. H.Shaping Internet Governance: Regulatory Challenges (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, F.Theories of the Information Society, 2nd edn (London, Routledge, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zittrain, J.The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It (Yale University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Klang, M.Disruptive Technology (Doctoral Dissertation, unpublished, 2006).Google Scholar
Allison, J. E. (ed.). Technology, Development, and Democracy: International Conflict and Cooperation in the Information Age (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Boeger, N. et al. (eds.). Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility (Cheltenham, Eward Elgar, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownsword, R., and Yeung, K. (eds.). Regulating Technologies: Legal Future, Regulatory Frames and Technological Fixes (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008).Google Scholar
Calhoun, C. (ed.). Habermas and the Public Sphere (MIT Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Crane, A. et al. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. A. et al. (eds.). The Democracy Sourcebook (MIT Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Deibert, R. et al. (eds.). Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace (MIT Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deibert, R. et al. (eds.). Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering (MIT Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Sousa Santos, B., and Rodriguez-Garavito, C. A. (eds.). Law and Globalization from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality (Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deva, S., and Bilchitz, D. (eds.). Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect (Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dommering, E., and Asscher, L. (eds.). Coding Regulation (Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (ed.). Recrafting the Rule of Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999).Google Scholar
Edwards, L., and Waelde, C. (eds.). Law and the Internet, 3rd edn (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdelez, S. et al. (eds.). Theories of Information Behavior: A Researcher’s Guide (Medford, New Jersey: Information Today, 2005).Google Scholar
Feenberg, A., and Barney, D. (eds.). Community in the Digital Age: Philosophy and Practice (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2004).Google Scholar
Jørgensen, R. F. (ed.). Human Rights in the Global Information Society (MIT Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klang, M., and Murray, A. (eds.). Human Rights in the Digital Age (London: Cavendish Publishing, 2005).Google Scholar
Levmore, S., and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.). The Offensive Internet (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D., and Wajcman, J. (eds.). The Social Shaping of Technology, 2nd edn (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
McBarnet, D. et al. (eds.). The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Morgan, B. (ed.). The Intersection of Rights and Regulation: New Directions in Sociolegal Scholarship (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007).Google Scholar
Nissebaum, H., and Price, M. E. (eds.). Academy & Internet (New York: Peter Lang Publishing, 2004).Google Scholar
Ramcharan, B. G. (ed.). The Protection Role of National Human Rights Institutions (Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarikakis, K., and Thussu, D. K. (eds.). Ideologies of the Internet (Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Shane, P. M. (ed.). Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal through the Internet (New York: Routledge, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, R. (ed.). Business and Human Rights: Dilemmas and Solutions (Greenleaf, 2003).Google Scholar
Walker, C., and Weaver, R. L. (ed.). Free Speech in an Internet Era (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Webb, K. (ed.). Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest and Innovation (Carleton Research Unit for Innovation, Science and Environment, 2004).Google Scholar
Webster, F. (ed.). The Information Society Reader (London: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
Agre, P. E.The Practical Republic: Social Skills and the Progress of Citizenship’, in Feenberg, A. and Barney, D. (eds.), Community in the Digital Age: Philosophy and Practice (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2004).Google Scholar
Banisar, D.The Right to Information in the Age of Information’, in JØrgensen, R. F. (ed.), Human Rights in the Global Information Socie’ty (MIT Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Barzilai Nahon, K.Network Gatekeeping Theory’, in Erdelez, S. et al. (eds.), Theories of Information Behavior: A Researcher’s Guide (Medford, New Jersey: Information Today, 2005).Google Scholar
Bilchitz, D.A Chasm between “Is” and “Ought”? A Critique of the Normative Foundations of the SRSG’s Framework and the Guiding Principles’, in Deva, S. and Bilchitz, D. (eds.), Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Bohman, J.Expanding Dialogue: The Internet, Public Sphere, and Transnational Democracy’, in Shane, P. M. (ed.), Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal through the Internet (New York: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
Campbell, T.The Normative Grounding of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Human Rights Approach’, in McBarnet, D. et al. (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Carroll, A. B.A History of Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts and Practices’, in Crane, A. et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Deibert, R. J., and Villeneuve, N.. ‘Firewalls and Power: An Overview of Global State Censorship of the Internet’, in Klang, M. and Murray, A. (eds.), Human Rights in the Digital Age (London: Cavendish Publishing, 2005).Google Scholar
Esler, B. W.Filtering, Blocking and Rating: Chaperones and Censorship’, in Klang, M. and Murray, A. (eds.), Human Rights in the Digital Age (London: Cavendish Publishing, 2005).Google Scholar
Faris, R., and Villeneuve, N.. ‘Measuring Global Internet Filtering’, in Deibert, R. et al. (eds.), Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering (MIT Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Freeman, J.Private Parties, Public Functions and the New Administrative Law’, in Dyzenhaus, D. (ed.), Recrafting the Rule of Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999).Google Scholar
Froomkin, A. M.Technologies for Democracy’, in Shane, P. M. (ed.), Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal through the Internet (New York: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
Glinski, C.Corporate Codes of Conduct: Moral or Legal Obligation’, in McBarnet, D. et al. (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Johnson, D., and Bimber, B.. ‘The Internet and Political Transformation Revisited’, in Feenberg, A. and Barney, D. (eds.), Community in the Digital Age: Philosophy and Practice (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2004).Google Scholar
Kahn, R., and Kellner, D.. ‘Virtually Democratic: Online Communities and Internet Activism’, in Feenberg, A. and Barney, D. (eds.), Community in the Digital Age: Philosophy and Practice (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2004).Google Scholar
Kedzie, C. R., and Aaragon, J.. ‘Coincident Revolutions and the Dictator’s Dilemma: Thoughts on Communication and Democratization’, in Allison, J. E. (ed.), Technology, Development, and Democracy: International Conflict and Cooperation in the Information Age (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Kinley, D. et al. ‘“The Norms Are Dead! Long Life the Norms!” The Politics behind the UN Human Rights Norms for Corporations’, in McBarnet, D. et al. (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Lambers, R.Code and Speech. Speech Control through Network Architecture’, in Dommering, E. and Asscher, L. (eds.), Coding Regulation (Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Leiter, B.Cleaning Cyber-Cesspools: Google and Free Speech’, in Levmore, S. and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.), The Offensive Internet (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Lopez, C.The “Ruggie Process”: From Legal Obligations to Corporate Social Responsibility?’, in Deva, S. and Bilchitz, D. (eds.), Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
McBarnet, D.Corporate Social Responsibility beyond Law, through Law, for Law: The New Corporate Accountability’, in McBarnet, D. et al. (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Maclay, C, ‘Protecting Privacy and Expression Online: Can the Global Network Initiative embrace the character of the Net?’, in Deibert, R. et al. (eds.), Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace (MIT Press, 2010).Google Scholar
McIntyre, T., and Scott, C.. ‘Internet Filtering: Rhetoric, Legitimacy, Accountability and Responsibility’, in Brownsword, R. and Yeung, K. (eds.), Regulating Technologies: Legal Future, Regulatory Frames and Technological Fixes (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008).Google Scholar
Morrison, A., and Webb, K.. ‘Bicycle Helmets and Hockey Helmet Regulations: Two Approaches to Safety Protection’, in Webb, K. (ed.), Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest and Innovation (Carleton Research Unit for Innovation, Science and Environment, 2004).Google Scholar
Muchlinski, P.The Development of Human Rights Responsibilities for Multinational Enterprises’, in Sullivan, R. (ed.), Business and Human Rights: Dilemmas and Solutions (Greenleaf, 2003).Google Scholar
Murdoch, S. J., and Anderson, R.. ‘Tools and Technology of Internet Filtering’, in Deibert, R. et al. (eds.), Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering (MIT Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Nolan, J.The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: Soft Law or Not Law?’, in Deva, S. and Bilchitz, D. (eds.), Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Noveck, B. S.Unchat: Democratic Solution for a Wired World’, in Shane, P. M. (ed.), Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal through the Internet (New York: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
Parker, C.Meta-Regulation: Legal Accountability for Corporate Social Responsibility’, in McBarnet, D. et al. (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Pinter, A., and Oblak, T.. ‘Is There a Public Sphere in This Discussion Forum?’, in Sarikakis, K. and Thussu, D. K. (eds.), Ideologies of the Internet (Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Riefa, C., and Hornle, J.. ‘The Changing Face of Electronic Consumer Contracts in the Twenty-First Century: Fit for Purpose?’, in Edwards, L. and Waelde, C. (eds.), Law and the Internet, 3rd edn (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009).Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, R.How Will the Net’s History Be Written? Historians and the Internet’, in Nissebaum, H. and Price, M. E. (eds.), Academy & Internet (New York: Peter Lang Publishing, 2004).Google Scholar
Rowland, D.Free Expression and Defamation’, in Klang, M. and Murray, A. (eds.), Human Rights in the Digital Age (London: Cavendish Publishing, 2005).Google Scholar
Raseroka, K.Access to Information and Knowledge’, in Jørgensen, R. F. (ed.), Human Rights in the Global Information Society (MIT Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Rundle, M., and Birdling, M.. ‘Filtering and the International System: A Question of Commitment’, in Deibert, R. et al. (eds.), Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering (MIT Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Scott, C.Reflexive Governance, Meta-Regulation, and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Heineken Effect’, in Boeger, N. et al. (eds.), Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility (Cheltenham, Eward Elgar, 2008).Google Scholar
Shamir, R.Corporate Social Responsibility: A Case of Hegemony and Counter-Hegemony’, in De Sousa Santos, B. and Rodriguez-Garavito, C. A. (eds.), Law and Globalization from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Vegh, S.Profit over Principles: The Commercialization of the Democratic Potentials of the Internet’, in Sarikakis, K. and Thussu, D. K. (eds.), Ideologies of the Internet (Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Vick, D.Regulating Hatred’, in Klang, M. and Murray, A. (eds.), Human Rights in the Digital Age (London: Cavendish Publishing, 2005).Google Scholar
Voilescu, A.Changing Paradigms of Corporate Criminal Responsibility: Lessons for Corporate Social Responsibility’, in McBarnet, D. et al. (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Webb, K.Understanding the Voluntary Codes Phenomenon’, in Webb, K. (ed.), Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest and Innovation (Carleton Research Unit for Innovation, Science and Environment, 2004).Google Scholar
Webb, K., and Morrison, A.. ‘The Law and Voluntary Codes: Examining the “Tangled Web”’, in Webb, K. (ed.), Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest and Innovation (Carleton Research Unit for Innovation, Science and Environment, 2004).Google Scholar
Weber, L. M., and Murray, S.. ‘Interactivity: Equality, and the Prospects for Electronic Democracy: A Review’, in Sarikakis, K. and Thussu, D. K. (eds.), Ideologies of the Internet (Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Winner, L.Do Artifacts Have Politics?’, in the MacKenzie, D. and Wajcman, J. (eds.), The Social Shaping of Technology, 2nd edn (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Akdeniz, Y.To Block or Not to Block: European Approaches to Content Regulation, and Implications for Freedom of Expression’, CLSR, 26 (2010) 260.Google Scholar
Ammori, M. ‘First Amendment Architecture’, Wis. L. Rev. (2012) 1.Google Scholar
Balkin, J. M.The Future of Free Expression in the Digital Age’, Pepp. L. Rev. 36 (2008) 101.Google Scholar
Balkin, J. M.Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society’, NYULR, 79(1) (2004) 1.Google Scholar
Barber, B. R.Three Scenarios for the Future of Technology and Strong Democracy’, PSQ, 113(4) (1998–99) 573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, B. R.Which Technology for Which Democracy? Why Democracy for Which Technology?’, IJCLP, 6 (2001) 1.Google Scholar
Barzilai-Nahon, K.Gatekeeping Revisited: A Critical Review’, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 43 (2009) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barzilai-Nahon, K.Toward a Theory of Network Gatekeeping: A Framework for Exploring Information Control’, JASIST, 59(9) (2008) 1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barzilai-Nahon, K.Gatekeepers, Virtual Communities and the Gated: Multidimensional Tensions in Cyberspace’, Int’l J. Comm. L. & Pol’y, 11(9) (2006) 1.Google Scholar
Ben-Ishai, S.Corporate Gatekeeper Liability in Canada’, Tex. Intl. L. J., 42 (2007) 443.Google Scholar
Benjamin, S. M.Algorithms and Speech’, U. PA. L. Rev. 161(6) (2013) 1445.Google Scholar
Benkler, Y.From Consumers to Users: The Deeper Structures of Regulation Toward Sustainable Commons and User Access’, Fed. Comm. L. J. 52 (2000) 561.Google Scholar
Benkler, Y. et al. ‘Social Mobilization and the Networked Public Sphere: Mapping the SOPA-PIPA Debate’ (July 2013), The Berkman Center for Internet & Society Research Publication Series No. 2013–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, M.The Deep Web: Surfacing Hidden Value’, J. Electron. Publ., 7(1) (2001) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J.Decentring Regulation: Understanding the Role of Regulation and Self-Regulation in a “Post-Regulatory” World’, CLP, 54 (2001) 103.Google Scholar
Bracha, O., and Pasquale, F.. ‘Federal Search Commission? Access, Fairness and Accountability in the Law of Search’, Cornell L. R. 93 (2008) 1149.Google Scholar
Chandler, J. A.A Right to Reach an Audience: An Approach to Intermediary Bias on the Internet’, Hofstra L. Rev. 35(3) (2007) 101.Google Scholar
Cortes, P., and De la Rosa, F. E.. ‘Building a Global Redress System for Low-Value Cross-Border Disputes’, Intl. & Comp. L. Q. 62(2) (2013) 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlberg, L.Democracy via Cyberspace’, New Media & Society, 3(2) (2001) 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlgren, P.The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation’, Political Communication, 22 (2005) 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darian-Smith, E., and Scott, C.. ‘Regulation and Human Rights in Socio-Legal Scholarship’, Law and Policy, 31(3) (2009) 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Hert, P., and Kloza, D.. ‘Internet (Access) as a New Fundamental Right. Inflating the Current Rights Framework?’, EJLT, 3(3) (2012).Google Scholar
Doane, D.The Myth of CSR: The Problem with Assuming That Companies Can Do Well While Also Doing Good Is That Markets Don’t Really Work That Way’, SSIR, 3(3) (2005) 23.Google Scholar
Edwards, L.From Child Porn to China, in One Cleanfeed’, Script-ed, 3(3) (2006) 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkin-Koren, N.Let the Crawlers Crawl: On Virtual Gatekeepers and the Right to Exclude Indexing’, U. Dayton L. Rev. 26 (2000) 179.Google Scholar
Froomkin, A. M.Habermas@Discourse.Net: Towards a Critical Theory of Cyberspace’, HLR, 116(3) (2003) 751.Google Scholar
Garnham, N.Information Society Theory as Ideology’ (1998) 21(1) Loisir et Societe97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasser, U. ‘Responsibility for Human Rights Violations, Acts or Omissions, within the “Sphere of Influence” of Companies’, Working Paper Series (December 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, E.Search Engine Bias and the Demise of Search Engine Utopianism’, YJLT, 8 (2005–6) 188.Google Scholar
Grimmelmann, J.The Google Dilemma’, N. Y. L. School L. Rev., 53 (2008/2009) 939.Google Scholar
Grimmelmann, J. ‘Speech Engines’, U. Md. Francis King Carey School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014–11 (2014) 867.Google Scholar
Habermas, J.Human Rights and Popular Sovereignty: The Liberal and Republican Versions’, Ratio Juris, 7(1) (1994) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J.Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research’, Communication Theory, 16 (2006) 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halcli, A., and Webster, F.. ‘Inequality and Mobilization in the Information Age’ (2000) 3(1) European Journal of Social Theory67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heverly, R.Breaking the Internet: International Efforts to Play the Middle against the Ends: A Way Forward’, Georgetown J. of Intl. L. 42(4) (2011) 1083.Google Scholar
Heverly, R. A. ‘Law as Intermediary’, Mich. St. L. Rev (2006) 107.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, M., and Koops, B.. ‘The Challenges of Ambient Law and Legal Protection in the Profiling Era’, MLR, 73(3) (2010) 428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, P. N., and Hussain, M. M.. ‘The Upheavals in Egypt and Tunisia: The Role of Digital Media’, Journal of Democracy, 22(3) (2011) 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. R., and Post, D. G.. ‘Law and Borders – The Rise of Law in Cyberspace’ (1996), at www.temple.edu/lawschool/dpost/Borders.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julia-Barcelo, , and Koelman, K. J., ‘Intermediary Liability in the E-Commerce Directive: So Far So Good, But It’s Not Enough’, CLSR, 16(4) (2004) 231.Google Scholar
Katyal, S. K.Semiotic Disobedience’, Wash. U. L. Rev. 84(2) (2006) 489.Google Scholar
Kohl, U.Google: The Rise and Rise of Online Intermediaries in the Governance of the Internet and Beyond (Part 2)’, IJILT, 21(2) (2013) 187.Google Scholar
Kohl, U.The Rise and Rise of Online Intermediaries in the Governance of the Internet and Beyond – Connectivity Intermediaries’, IRLCT 26(2) (2011) 185.Google Scholar
Kraakman, R. H.Corporate Liability Strategies and the Costs of Legal Controls’, Yale L. J. 93 (1983–1985) 857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraakman, R. H.Gatekeepers: The Anatomy of a Third-Party Enforcement Strategy’, J. L. Econ. & Org. 2 (1986) 53.Google Scholar
Kreimer, S. F.Censorship By Proxy: First Amendment, Internet Intermediaries, and the Problem of the Weakest Link’, U. Pa. L. Rev. 155 (2006–2007) 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laidlaw, E. B.A Framework for Identifying Internet Information Gatekeepers’, IRLCT, 43(3) (2010) 263.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, E. B.Private Power, Public Interest: An Examination of Search Engine Accountability’, IJLIT, 17 (1) (2009) 113.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, E.The Responsibilities of Free Speech Regulators: An Analysis of the Internet Watch Foundation’, IJILT, 20(4) (2012) 312.Google Scholar
Lewin, K.Frontiers in Group Dynamics’, Human Relations, 1(2) (1947) 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lievens, E. et al. ‘The Co-Protection of Minors in New Media: A European Approach to Co-Regulation’, U. C. Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol’y, 10 (2006) 98.Google Scholar
Longford, G., and Patten, S.. ‘Democracy in the Age of the Internet’, UNBLJ, 56 (2007) 5.Google Scholar
Mac Síthigh, D.‘App Law Within: Rights and Regulation in the Smartphone Age’, IJILT, 21(2) (2013) 154.Google Scholar
Mac Síthigh, D.The Fragmentation of Intermediary Liability in the UK’, JIPLP, 8(7) (2013) 521.Google Scholar
Mac Síthigh, D.Virtual Walls? The Law of Pseudo-Public Spaces’, Int. J. L. C. 8(3) (2012) 394.Google Scholar
Mann, R. J., and Belzley, S. R.. ‘The Promise of Internet Intermediary Liability’, W. M. & Mary L. Rev. 47 (2005) 239.Google Scholar
Manokha, I.Business Ethics and the Spirit of Global Capitalism: Moral Leadership in the Context of Global Hegemony’, Journal of Global Ethics, 2(1) (2006) 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manokha, I.Corporate Social Responsibility: A New Signifier? An Analysis of Business Ethics and Good Business Practice’, Politics, 24(1) (2004) 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCorquodale, R.Corporate Social Responsibility and International Human Rights Law’, Journal of Business Ethics, 87 (2009) 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCorquodale, R., and Fairbrother, R.. ‘Globalization and Human Rights’, Hum. Rts. Q. 21(3)) (1999) 735.Google Scholar
Metoyer-Duran, C.Information Gatekeepers’, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 28 (1993) 111.Google Scholar
Murray, A.Nodes and Gravity in Virtual Space’, Legisprudence, 5(2) (2011) 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, A.Symbiotic Regulation’, J. Marshall J. of Computer & Info. L. 26(2) (2009) 207.Google Scholar
Murray, A., and Scott, C.. ‘Regulating New Media’, MLR, 65 (2002) 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okoye, A.Theorising Corporate Social Responsibility as an Essentially Contested Concept: Is a Definition Necessary?’, J. Bus. Ethics, 89 (2009) 613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orgad, S.The Cultural Dimensions of Online Communication: A Study of Breast Cancer Patients’ Internet Spaces’, New Media & Society, 8(6) (2006) 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palfrey, J. G.Four Phases of Internet Regulation’, Social Research, 77(3) (Fall 2010).Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Z.The Virtual Sphere: The Internet as a Public Sphere’, New Media & Society, 4(1) (2002) 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasquale, F.Asterisk Revisited: Debating a Right of Reply on Search Results’, J. Bus. & Tech. L. 3 (2008) 61.Google Scholar
Pasquale, F.Rankings, Reductionalism and Responsibility’, Clev. St. L. Rev. 54 (2006) 115.Google Scholar
Patterson, M. R. ‘Google and Search-Engine Market Power’, Harvard Journal Law and Technology Occasional Paper Series (2013) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picciotto, S.Rights, Responsibilities and Regulation of International Business’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 42 (2003) 131.Google Scholar
Pitts, C., and Sherman, J.. ‘Human Rights Corporate Accountability Guide: From Laws to Norms to Values’, Working Paper No. 51, Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative (December 2008).Google Scholar
Price, V. et al. ‘Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion?’, Political Communication, 19(1) (2002) 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reidenberg, J. R.Lex Informatica: The Formulation of Information Policy Rules through Technology’, Tex. L. R. 76(3) (1998) 553.Google Scholar
Rowbottom, J.To Rant, Vent and Converse: Protecting Low Level Digital Speech’, CLJ, 71(2) (2012) 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, A. G., and Palazzo, G.. ‘Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Social Responsibility: Business and Society Seen from a Habermasian Perspective’, Academy of Management Review, 32(4) (2007) 1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, W. et al. ‘Search Engines as Gatekeepers of Public Communication: An Analysis of the German Framework Applicable to Internet Search Engines Including Media Law and Anti Trust Law’, German Law Journal, 6(1) (2005) 1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, C.Accountability in The Regulatory State’, Journal of Law and Society, 27(1) (2000) 38.Google Scholar
Seyfert, C.25 Clauses of Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service Are Legally Void’, E. C. L. Rep. 14(1) (2014), 23.Google Scholar
Sheehy, B.Understanding CSR: An Empirical Study of Private Self-Regulation’, Monash Law Review, 38(2) (2011) 1.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, P. et al. ‘Individual and Routine Forces in Gatekeeping’, J&MC Quarterly, 78(2 (2001) 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P.The Politics of UK Television Policy: The Making of Ofcom’, Media Culture & Society, 28(6) (2006) 929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutter, G.“Nothing New under the Sun”: Old Fear and New Media’, IJLIT, 8 (2000), 338.Google Scholar
Van Couvering, E.Is Relevance Relevant? Market, Science, and War: Discourses of Search Engine Quality’, J. Comput.-Mediat. Comm. 12(3) (2007) 866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Eijk, N.Search Engines: Seek and Ye Shall Find? The Position of Search Engines in Law’, Iris plus, 2 (2006) 1.Google Scholar
Votaw, D.Genius Became Rare: A Comment on the Doctrine of Social Responsibility Pt 1’, Calif. Manage. Rev. 15(2) (1972) 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, T.Machine Speech’, U. PA. L. Rev. 161(6) (2013) 1495.Google Scholar
Zittrain, J.A History of Online Gatekeeping’, Harv. J. L. & Tech. 19(2) (2006) 253.Google Scholar
Zittrain, J.Internet Points of Control’, B. C. L. Rev. 44 (2002) 653.Google Scholar
Ahlert, C. et al. ‘How “liberty” disappeared from cyberspace: the mystery shopper tests internet content self-regulation’, at http://pcmlp.socleg.ox.ac.uk/sites/pcmlp.socleg.ox.ac.uk/files/liberty.pdf.Google Scholar
Bayer, J.Liability of internet service providers for third party content’, Victoria University Wellington Working Paper Series, 1 (2008) 1.Google Scholar
Best, M. L., and Wade, K. W.. ‘The internet and democracy: global catalyst or democratic dud’ (Research Publication No. 2005–12: Berkman Center, 2005).Google Scholar
Brown, I.Internet self-regulation and fundamental rights’, Index on Censorship, 1 (2010) 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, I., and Korff, D.. ‘Digital freedoms in international law: practical steps to protect human rights online’ (June 2012) (report commissioned by the Global Network Initiative).Google Scholar
Business Leaders Initiative on Human Rights, United Nations Global Compact and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. ‘A guide for integrating human rights into business management I’.Google Scholar
Business Leaders Initiative on Human Rights, United Nations Global Compact and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. ‘A guide for integrating human rights into business management II’.Google Scholar
Canadian Centre for Child Protection. Child sexual abuse images: an analysis of websites by cybertip.ca (November 2009).Google Scholar
Communication. ‘Implementing the Partnership for Growth and Jobs: Making Europe a Pole of Excellence on Corporate Social Responsibility’, COM (2006) 136.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. ‘Building a Free and Safe Internet’, Submission to the Internet Governance Forum, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 12–15 November 2007.Google Scholar
Council of Europe and European Internet Service Providers Association. ‘Human rights guidelines for Internet service providers’, at www.coe.int/t/informationsociety/documents/HRguidelines_ISP_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Council of Europe and the Interactive Software Federation of Europe. ‘Human rights guidelines for online game providers’, at www.coe.int/t/informationsociety/documents/HRguidelines_OGP_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. Recommendation CM/Rec(2008)6 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on measures to promote the respect for freedom of expression and information with regard to internet filters (March 2008).Google Scholar
Clayton, R. ‘Failures in a hybrid content blocking system’, at www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rnc1/cleanfeed.pdf.Google Scholar
The Department of Trade and Industry. DTI Consultation Document on the Electronic Commerce Directive: The Liability of Hyperlinkers, Location Tools Services and Content Aggregators (June 2005), at http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20090609003228/http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file13986.pdf.Google Scholar
Edelman, B., and Lockwood, B.. ‘Measuring bias in “organic” web search’, at www.benedelman.org/searchbias/.Google Scholar
Equality and Human Rights Commission. Submission to the 10th International Conference of NHRIs (Session 6 on 9 October 2010), The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights.Google Scholar
European Commission. Communication on Internet Policy and Governance Europe’s role in shaping the future of Internet Governance COM/2014/072.Google Scholar
European Commission. ‘A Coherent Framework for Building Trust in the Digital Single Market for E-Commerce and Online Services’, COM(2011) 942.Google Scholar
European Commission. ‘A Renewed EU strategy 2011–14 for Corporate Social Responsibility’, COM(2011) 681.Google Scholar
European Commission. ‘European Governance: A White Paper’,COM(2001) 428 (25 July 2001).Google Scholar
European Multi-Stakeholder Forum on CSR: Final Results and Recommendations (29 June 2004).Google Scholar
Frankental, P., and House, F.. ‘Human Rights – Is It Any of Your Business?’ (2000) Amnesty International.Google Scholar
Green Paper. ‘Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility’, COM (2001) 366.Google Scholar
HM Government. Corporate Responsibility Report (BERR, February 2009).Google Scholar
HM Government. Corporate Social Responsibility: A Government Update (DTI, May 2004).Google Scholar
HM Government. Good Business: Implementing the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (September 2013).Google Scholar
House of Commons, Justice Committee. The Functions, Powers and Resources of the Information Commissioner, Ninth Report of Session 2012–13 (12 March 2013), at www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmjust/962/962.pdf.Google Scholar
Human Rights Council. ‘Elaboration of an international legally binding instrument on Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises with respect to Human Rights’ (A/HRC/26/L.22), at http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/LTD/G14/064/48/PDF/G1406448.pdf?OpenElement.Google Scholar
Information Commissioner’s Office. Data Protection and the Press – Framework Consultation on Proposed ICO Code of Practice, at http://ico.org.uk/news/blog/2013/~/media/documents/library/Data_Protection/Research_and_reports/framework-consultation-summary-of-responses.pdf.Google Scholar
Information Commissioner’s Office. The Information Commissioner’s Response to the Leveson Report, at http://ico.org.uk/news/~/media/documents/consultation_responses/ico_response_to_leveson_report_012013.ashx (last visited 2 April 2014).Google Scholar
International Council on Human Rights Policy. Beyond Voluntarism: Human Rights and the Developing International Legal Obligations of Companies (February 2002), at www.ichrp.org/files/reports/7/107_report_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Internet Watch Foundation. Annual and Charity Report 2013, at www.iwf.org.uk/accountability/annual-reports/2013-annual-report.Google Scholar
Internet Watch Foundation. 2012 Annual and Charity Report, at www.iwf.org.uk/accountability/annual-reports/2011-annual-report (last visited 27 June 2014).Google Scholar
Internet Watch Foundation. 2008 Annual and Charity Report, at www.iwf.org.uk/accountability/annual-reports/2008-annual-report.Google Scholar
Internet Watch Foundation, Annual and Charity Report 2006.Google Scholar
Joint Committee on Human Rights. Any of Our Business? Human Rights and the UK Private Sector (First Reports of Session 2009–10), vol. I.Google Scholar
Joint Committee on Human Rights. Any of Our Business? Human Rights and the UK Private Sector (First Reports of Session 2009–10), vol. II.Google Scholar
Joint Committee on Human Rights. Equality and Human Rights Commission (Thirteenth Report of Session 2009–10).Google Scholar
Laidlaw, E. ‘Unraveling Intermediary Liability’, presented at British and Irish Law, Education and Technology (University of East Anglia, April 2014), at www.laidlaw.eu/2014/06/unraveling-intermediary-liability/.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, E.What is a joke? The role of social media providers in regulating speech’, presented at The Legal Challenges of Social Media to Freedom of Expression (University of Leicester, December 2013), at www.laidlaw.eu/2014/06/what-is-a-joke-the-role-of-social-media-providers-in-regulating-speech/.Google Scholar
McIntyre, T. J. ‘Intermediaries, Invisibility and the Rule of Law’, BILETA Conference Paper (2008).Google Scholar
Monash University Castan Centre for Human Rights Law. Human Rights Translated: A Business Reference Guide.Google Scholar
Nahon, K. et al. ‘Information flows in events of political unrest’ at www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/39165/259.pdf?sequence=4.Google Scholar
Ntoulas, A. et al. ‘Downloading hidden content’, at http://oak.cs.ucla.edu/~cho/papers/ntoulas-hidden.pdf.Google Scholar
OECD Watch. 10 Years On: Assessing the Contribution of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises to Responsible Business Conduct.Google Scholar
Office of the Privacy Commissioner. ‘The case for reforming the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act’ (May 2013), at https://www.priv.gc.ca/parl/2013/pipeda_r_201305_e.pdf.Google Scholar
Office of the United Nations Commissioner for Human Rights. Business and Human Rights: A Progress Report (2000), at www2.ohchr.org/english/about/publications/docs/business.htm.Google Scholar
Palfrey, J. G. Jr.Reluctant Gatekeepers: Corporate Ethics on a Filtered Internet’, in Global Information Technology Report (World Economic Forum: 2006–2007).Google Scholar
Promoting a European Framework for corporate social responsibility, Green Paper (Employment & Social Affairs, 2001).Google Scholar
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee. First Report on the Application of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (Directive on electronic commerce).Google Scholar
Report of the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of expression, Frank La Rue to the United Nations General Assembly, 16 May 2011, at www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Opinion/A.66.290.pdf.Google Scholar
Rt Hon Lord McNally. Letter. The Functions, Powers and Resources of the Information Commissioner: Government Response to the Committee’s Ninth Report of Session 2012–13 (30 June 2013), at www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmjust/560/56004.htm.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. ‘Business and human rights: Further steps towards the operationalization of the “protect, respect and remedy” framework’ (April 2010), at www.reports-and-materials.org/Ruggie-report-2010.pdf (last visited 5 August 2011).Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. ‘Business and human rights: towards operationalizing the “protect, respect and remedy” framework’ (2009), at www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/11session/A.HRC.11.13.pdf.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. ‘Guiding principles on business and human rights: implementing the United Nations “protect, respect and remedy” framework’ (March 2011), at www.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/ruggie/ruggie-guiding-principles-21-mar-2011.pdf.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. ‘Protect, respect and remedy: a framework for business and human rights: Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises’ (2008), at www.reports-and-materials.org/Ruggie-report-7-Apr-2008.pdf.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. ‘State obligations to provide access to remedy for human rights abuses by third parties, including business: an overview of international and regional provisions, commentary and decisions’ (Addendum) (2009), at www.reports-and-materials.org/Ruggie-addendum-15-May-2009.doc.Google Scholar
Safer Children in a Digital World: The Report of the Byron Review (Crown copyright, 2008).Google Scholar
Twentyfifty. The Private Sector and Human Rights in the UK (October 2009).Google Scholar
UK Government. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A Government Update’ (DTI, May 2004).Google Scholar
United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: An Interpretive Guide (2012).Google Scholar
United Nations Global Compact. Corporate Citizenship in the World Economy (October 2008).Google Scholar
Utting, P. ‘Rethinking business regulation: from self-regulation to social control’, Technology, Business and Society Programme Paper Number 15, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (2005).Google Scholar
van Eijk, N.Search Engines, the New Bottleneck for Content Access, Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012–21.Google Scholar
Verbiest, T. et al. Study on the Liability of Internet Intermediaries, Markt/2006/09/E (November 2007), at http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/e-commerce/docs/study/liability/final_report_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Volokh, E., and Falk, D. M.. ‘First Amendment protection for search engine search results’ (white paper commissioned by Google) (2012), at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2055364.Google Scholar
Walker, C., and Akdeniz, Y.. ‘The governance of the Internet in Europe with special reference to illegal and harmful content’, at www.cyber-rights.org/documents/CrimLR_ya_98.pdf.Google Scholar
Westminster eForum. Transcript. Taming the Wild Web? – Online Content Regulation (London: 11 February 2009).Google Scholar
Wild, L.Democracy in the Age of Modern Communications: An Outline (2008) Paper for Freedom of Expression Project, Global Partners & Associates.Google Scholar
Interview with Fry, Stephen, at http://www.videojug.com/interview/stephen-fry-web-20 (last visited 22 July 2011).Google Scholar
Agence France-Press. ‘Russia censors media by blocking websites and popular blog’ (4 March 2014) at www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/14/russia-bans-alexei-navalny-blog-opposition-news-websites.Google Scholar
Alexander, A. ‘Internet role in Egypt’s protests’ (9 February 211), at www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12400319.Google Scholar
Almunia, J. Speech/12/372, ‘Statement of VP Almunia on the Google antitrust investigation’ (21 May 2012), at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-12-372_en.htm.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. Public statement. ‘Amnesty International involvement with the internet multi stakeholder initiative’ (29 October 2008), at www.amnesty.org/ar/library/asset/POL30/009/2008/es/1c327fdf-a67c-11dd-966b-0da92cc4cb95/pol300092008en.pdf.Google Scholar
Anderson, S. et al. ‘Top 200: the rise of corporate global power’ (4 December 2000), at http://corpwatch.org/article.php?id=377.Google Scholar
Annan, K. A. ‘Break the technology barrier – the world information summit’ (9 December 2003), at (9 December 2003), at www.nytimes.com/2003/12/09/opinion/09iht-edannan_ed3_.html.Google Scholar
Arthur, C. ‘Google faces deluge of requests to wipe details from search index’ (4 May 2014), at www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/may/15/hundreds-google-wipe-details-search-index-right-forgotten.Google Scholar
Barlow, J. P. ‘Selling wine without bottles: economy of mind on the global net’ (March 1994), at http://virtualschool.edu/mon/ElectronicFrontier/WineWithoutBottles.html.Google Scholar
Barrett, T. ‘To censor pro-union website, Telus blocked 766 others’ (4 August 2005), at www.labournet.net/world/0508/canada2.html.Google Scholar
The BBC. ‘Child abuse “big business online”’ (13 May 2010), at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/10108720.stm.Google Scholar
The BBC. ‘Internet access is a “fundamental rights”’ (8 March 2010), at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8548190.stm.Google Scholar
The BBC. ‘Luminaries look to the future web’, at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7373717.stm.Google Scholar
The BBC. ‘Online pornography to be blocked by default, PM announces’ (22 July 2013), at www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23401076.Google Scholar
The BBC. ‘Quango list shows 192 to be axed’ (14 October 2010), at www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11538534.Google Scholar
Beckett, C. ‘SuperMedia: the future as “networked journalism”’ (10 June 2008), at www.opendemocracy.net/article/supermedia-the-networked-journalism-future.Google Scholar
Beckett, C. ‘State 2.0: a new front end?’ (7 September 2009), at www.opendemocracy.net/article/state-2-0-a-new-front-end.Google Scholar
Bello, O. ‘The Kimberley Process risks becoming irrelevant to cogent concerns’ (28 October 2013), at www.saiia.org.za/opinion-analysis/the-kimberley-process-risks-becoming-irrelevant-to-cogent-concerns.Google Scholar
Bennett-Smith, M. ‘Facebook vows to crack down on rape joke pages after successful protest, boycott’ (29 May 2013), at www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/29/facebook-rape-jokes-protest_n_3349319.html.Google Scholar
Berners-Lee, T. et al. ‘The Semantic Web’ (17 May 2001), at www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-semantic-web.Google Scholar
Cain, M. ‘Why does the PCC pretend it can do something about phone hacking?’ (31 January 2011), at http://pccwatch.co.uk/why-does-the-pcc-pretend-about-phone-hacking/.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. Prime Minister’s speech. ‘The internet and pornography: Prime Minister calls for action’ (22 July 2013), at www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-internet-and-pornography-prime-minister-calls-for-action.Google Scholar
Cerf, V. ‘Internet access is not a human rights’ (4 January 2012), at www.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/opinion/internet-access-is-not-a-human-right.html?_r=0.Google Scholar
Change.org. ‘We need women on British banknotes’, at www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/we-need-women-on-british-banknotes.Google Scholar
CNN World. ‘“Neda” becomes rallying cry for Iranian protests’ (21 June 2009), at http://articles.cnn.com/2009-06-21/world/iran.woman.twitter_1_neda-peaceful-protest-cell-phone?_s=PM:WORLD.Google Scholar
comScore. ‘ComScore releases January 2014 U. S. search engine rankings’ (18 February 2014), at www.comscore.com/Insights/Press_Releases/2014/2/comScore_Releases_January_2014_US_Search_Engine_Rankings.Google Scholar
Crete-Nishihata, M. ‘Egypt’s internet blackout: extreme example of just-in-time blocking’ (28 January 2011), at http://opennet.net/blog/2011/01/egypt%E2%80%99s-internet-blackout-extreme-example-just-time-blocking.Google Scholar
Curtis, S. ‘BT forces porn filter choice’ (16 December 2013), at www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/internet-security/10520537/BT-forces-porn-filter-choice.html.Google Scholar
Davies, L. ‘Facebook refuses to take down rape joke pages’ (30 September 2011), at www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/sep/30/facebook-refuses-pull-rape-jokepages.Google Scholar
Davies, C. J. ‘The hidden censors of the Internet’, Wired Magazine (June 2006), at www.wired.co.uk/wired-magazine/archive/2009/05/features/the-hidden-censors-of-the-internet.aspx?page=all.Google Scholar
D’Jaen, M. ‘Global Initiative to protect net privacy and freedoms launched’, e-commerce law & policy (December 2008), at www.perkinscoie.com/files/upload/PRIV_09-01_Article_Jaen.pdf.Google Scholar
Downes, L. ‘Why no one will join the Global Network Initiative’ (30 March 2011), at www.forbes.com/sites/larrydownes/2011/03/30/why-no-one-will-join-the-global-network-initiative/.Google Scholar
Electronic Frontier Foundation. Commentary. ‘Everyone who’s made a Hitler parody video, leave the room’ (20 April 2010), at www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/04/everyone-who-s-made-hitler-parody-leave-room.Google Scholar
Electronic Frontier Foundation. ‘GNI resignation letter’, at www.eff.org/document/gni-resignation-letter.Google Scholar
Electronic Frontier Foundation. Letter, at www.eff.org/files/filenode/gni/signon_letter.txt.Google Scholar
Enge, E. ‘6 Major Google changes reveal the future of SEO’ (30 December 2013), at http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2301719/6-Major-Google-Changes-Reveal-the-Future-of-SEO.Google Scholar
European Commission. IP/14/116, ‘Antitrust: commission obtains from Google comparable display of specialised search rivals’ (5 February 2014), at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-116_en.htm.Google Scholar
European Commission. IP/13/371, ‘Antitrust: commission seeks feedback on commitments offered by Google to address competition concerns’ (25 April 2013), at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-371_en.htm.Google Scholar
European Commission. Statement, ‘Statement by Commissioner Vestager on Google antitrust investigations at the European Parliament (ECON committee meeting)’ (11 November 2014), at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_STATEMENT-14-1646_en.htm.Google Scholar
Facebook. ‘How to report things’, at www.facebook.com/help/181495968648557.Google Scholar
Fallows, D. ‘Election newshounds speak up: newspaper, TV, and internet fans tell how and why they differ’, The Pew Research Center (6 February 2007), at http://pewresearch.org/pubs/406/election-newshounds-speak-up.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, L. et al. ‘The semantic web in action’, Scientific American (Dec 2007), reproduced with permission, at www.thefigtrees.net/lee/sw/sciam/semantic-web-in-action.Google Scholar
Fiveash, K. ‘Google disappears torrent terms from autocomplete search results’ (27 January 2011), at www.theregister.co.uk/2011/01/27/google_bittorrent_terms_killed_on_autocomplete/.Google Scholar
Galperin, E., and O’Brien, D.. ‘Russia blocks access to major independent news sites’ (13 March 2014), at www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/03/russia-blocks-access-major-independent-news-sites.Google Scholar
Ganesan, A. ‘Viewpoint: why voluntary initiatives aren’t enough’, Leading Perspectives (Spring 2009), at www.bsr.org/reports/leading-perspectives/2009/LP_Spring_2009_Voluntary_Initiatives.pdf.Google Scholar
Google. ‘A new approach to China’ (12 January 2010), at http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html.Google Scholar
Google. ‘A quick note about music blog removals’ (10 February 2010), at http://buzz.blogger.com/2010/02/quick-note-about-music-blog-removals.html.Google Scholar
Google. ‘Corporate social responsibility’, at www.google.com/intl/zh-CN/corporate/responsibility_en.html.Google Scholar
Google. ‘Controversial content and free expression on the web: a refresher’ (19 April 2010), at http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/controversial-contentand-free.html.Google Scholar
Google. ‘The Federal Trade Commission closes its antitrust review’ (3 January 2013), at http://googleblog.blogspot.ca/2013/01/the-federal-trade-commission-closes-its.html.Google Scholar
Google. ‘Finding more high-quality sites in search’ (24 February 2011), at http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/02/finding-more-high-quality-sites-in.html.Google Scholar
Google. ‘Let the music play’ (26 August 2009), at http://buzz.blogger.com/2009/08/let-music-play.html.Google Scholar
Google. ‘Search more securely with encrypted Google web search’ (21 May 2010), at http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/05/search-more-securely-with-encrypted.html.Google Scholar
Google. ‘Some weekend work that will (hopefully) enable more Egyptians to be heard’ (31 January 2011), at http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/01/some-weekend-work-that-will-hopefully.html.Google Scholar
Google. ‘Transparency report’, at www.google.com/transparencyreport/traffic/.Google Scholar
Google Blog. ‘Controversial content and free expression on the web: a refresher’, at http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/controversial-content-and-free.html.Google Scholar
Grossman, W. ‘IWF reforms could pave way for UK net censorship: who is watching the watchers?’ (29 December 2006), at www.theregister.co.uk/2006/12/29/iwf_feature/page3.html.Google Scholar
The Guardian. ‘Occupy protests around the world: full list visualised’, at www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2011/oct/17/occupy-protests-world-list-map.Google Scholar
Halfacree, G. ‘Government extends porn filter to “extremist” content’ (29 November 2013), at www.bit-tech.net/news/bits/2013/11/29/extremism-filter/1.Google Scholar
Halliday, J. ‘Google search results may indicate “right to be forgotten” censorship’ (8 June 2014), at www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/08/google-search-results-indicate-right-to-be-forgotten-censorship.Google Scholar
Halliday, J. ‘Google Street View: information commissioner shackled by Data Protection Act’ (28 October 2010), at www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/oct/28/google-street-view-information-commissioner.Google Scholar
Halliday, J. ‘Google Street View broke Canada’s privacy law with Wi-Fi capture’ (20 October 2010), at www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/oct/19/google-street-view-privacy-canada.Google Scholar
Hudson, A. ‘Turkey lifts its ban on YouTube-agency’ (30 October 2010), at http://uk.reuters.com/article/2010/10/30/oukin-uk-turkey-youtube-idUKTRE69T1JE20101030.Google Scholar
The Huffington Post. ‘Neda video wins Polk Award: Iran protest death video first anonymous winner of journalism prize’ (16 February 2010, at www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/16/neda-video-wins-polk-award_n_463378.html.Google Scholar
Information Commissioner’s Office. News release. ‘ICO fines former ACS Law boss for lax IT security’, at www.ico.gov.uk/~/media/documents/pressreleases/2011/monetary_penalty_acslaw_news_release_20110510.ashx.Google Scholar
ISPreview. ‘UK government seeking to expand website blocking remit through IWF’ (9 June 2011), at www.ispreview.co.uk/story/2011/06/09/uk-government-seeking-to-expand-website-blocking-remit-through-iwf.html.Google Scholar
Jaume-Palasi, L. ‘“Google Spain case”: court decision privatises the public sphere’ (27 May 2014), at http://policyreview.info/articles/news/google-spain-case-court-decision-privatises-public-sphere/291.Google Scholar
Jeffries, S. ‘A rare interview with Jürgen Habermas’, The Financial Times (30 April 2010), at www.ft.com/cms/s/0/eda3bcd8-5327-11df-813e-00144feab49a.html.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. ‘Amnesty criticises Global Network Initiative for online freedom of speech’ (30 October 2008), at www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/oct/30/amnesty-global-network-initiative.Google Scholar
Kain, E. ‘Reddit makes headlines boycotting GoDaddy over online censorship bills’ (26 December 2011), at www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2011/12/26/reddit-makes-headlines-boycotting-godaddy-over-online-censorship-bills/.Google Scholar
Kiss, J. ‘Facebook’s 10th birthday: from college dorm to 1.23 billion users’ (4 February 2014), at www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/04/facebook-10-years-mark-zuckerberg.Google Scholar
Kopytoff, V. G. ‘Sites like Twitter absent from free speech pact’ (6 March 2011), at www.nytimes.com/2011/03/07/technology/07rights.html.Google Scholar
Kravets, D. ‘What’s fueling Midest protests? It’s more than Twitter’ (28 January 2011), at www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-01/28/middle-east-protests-twitter?page=all.Google Scholar
Letsch, C., and Rushe, D.. ‘Turkey blocks YouTube amid “national security” concerns’ (28 March 2014), at www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/27/google-youtube-ban-turkey-erdogan.Google Scholar
MacAskill, E. ‘Wikileaks website pulled by Amazon after US political pressure’, at www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/01/wikileaks-website-cables-servers-amazon.Google Scholar
Melik, J. ‘Diamonds: does the Kimberley Process work?’ (28 June 2010), at www.bbc.co.uk/news/10307046.Google Scholar
Metz, C. ‘Google’s “Musicblogocide” blame the DMCA’ (11 February 2010), at www.theregister.co.uk/2010/02/11/google_musicblogocide_2010/.Google Scholar
Metz, C. ‘IWF confirms Wayback Machine porn blacklisting’ (14 January 2009), at www.theregister.co.uk/2009/01/14/iwf_details_archive_blacklisting/.Google Scholar
Michaels, S. ‘Google shuts down music blogs without warning’ (11 February 2010), at www.guardian.co.uk/music/2010/feb/11/google-deletes-music-blogs.Google Scholar
Morton, G. ‘Muslim leader drops Ezra Levant cartoon complaint’ (12 February 2008), at www.nationalpost.com/news/canada/story.html?id=303895.Google Scholar
Mulholland, H. ‘Government targets extremist websites’ (17 January 2008), at www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/jan/17/uksecurity.terrorism.Google Scholar
Nakashima, E. ‘Sexual threats stifle some female bloggers’ (30 April 2007), at www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/29/AR2007042901555.html.Google Scholar
Noman, H. ‘Saudi Arabia to impose restrictions on online content production, including on YouTube’ (3 December 2013), at https://opennet.net/blog/2013/12/saudi-arabia-impose-restrictions-online-content-production-including-youtube.Google Scholar
Nyaira, S. ‘Kimberley Process in turmoil after chairman clears Zimbabwe diamond sales’ (23 March 2011), at www.voanews.com/zimbabwe/news/Kimberley-Process-In-Turmoil-After-Chairman-Allows-Zimbabwes-Marange-Gems-Trade-118509874.html.Google Scholar
Oates, J. ‘ICO reopens Google Street View privacy probe’ (25 October 2010), at www.theregister.co.uk/2010/10/25/ico_google_probe/.Google Scholar
Ofcom. ‘Identifying appropriate regulatory solutions: principles for analysing self- and co-regulation’ (10 December 2008), at http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/coregulation/statement/statement.pdf.Google Scholar
Office of National Statistics. ‘Internet access – households and individuals, 2013’, at www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/rdit2/internet-access–-households-and-individuals/2013/stb-ia-2013.html.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics. ‘Internet access 2010’, at http://www.statistics.gov.uk/pdfdir/iahi0810.pdf.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, T. ‘What is Web 2.0’ (30 September 2005), at http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html.Google Scholar
Out-Law. ‘Super-injunction Twitter user in contempt of court if tweets were true’ (10 May 2011), at www.theregister.co.uk/2011/05/10/super_injunctions_tweeter_in_trouble_if_its_true/.Google Scholar
Out-Law.com. ‘Why the IWF was wrong to lift its ban on a Wikipedia page’ (11 December 2008), at www.out-law.com/page-9653.Google Scholar
Out-Law.com. ‘Information Commissioner gets power to fine for privacy breaches’ (12 May 2008), at www.out-law.com/page-9110.Google Scholar
Palfrey, J. ‘Testimony on internet filtering and surveillance’ at http://jpalfrey.andover.edu/2008/05/20/testimony-on-internet-filtering-and-surveillance/.Google Scholar
Pauli, D. ‘Australia’s Web blacklist leaked’ Computer World (19 March 2009), at www.computerworld.com.au/article/296161/australia_web_blacklist_leaked/.Google Scholar
Petley, J.Web Control’, Index on Censorship, 38(1) (2009) 78.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. ‘Internet use over time’ (September 2013), at www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/internet-use/internet-use-over-time/.Google Scholar
Press Association. ‘Two face jail over Twitter abuse of banknote campaigner’ (24 January 2014), at www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jan/24/two-face-jail-twitter-abuse.Google Scholar
Privacy International. ‘Civil liberties groups say UK information commissioner’s office is not “fit for purpose”’ (3 November 2010), at www.privacyinternational.org/article/civil-liberties-groups-say-uk-information-commissioner%E2%80%99s-office-not-fit-purpose.Google Scholar
Rainey, J. ‘Barack Obama can thank “citizen journalist” for “bitter” tempest’ (15 April 2008), at http://articles.latimes.com/print/2008/apr/15/nation/na-bitter15.Google Scholar
Reporters Without Borders. ‘Why reporters without borders is not endorsing the global principles on freedom of expression and privacy for ICT companies operating in internet-restricting countries’ (28 October 2008), at http://en.rsf.org/why-reporters-without-borders-is-28-10-2008,29117.html.Google Scholar
Reuters. ‘PCC clears Murdoch paper over hacking claim’ (9 November 2009), at www.independent.co.uk/news/media/press/pcc-clears-murdoch-paper-over-hacking-claim-1817573.html.Google Scholar
Rhoads, C., and Fowler, G. A.. ‘Egypt shuts down internet, cellphone services’, The Wall Street Journal (29 January 2011), at http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703956604576110453371369740.html?mod=googlenews_wsj.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. ‘PCC to re-examine News of the World phone-hacking evidence’, at www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/sep/21/phone-hacking-news-of-the-world.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. ‘The past as prologue? a moment of truth for UN business and human rights treaty’ at www.ihrb.org/commentary/past-as-prologue.html#_edn2.Google Scholar
Salkowitz, R. ‘Politicans seek “new” new media for 2012 run’ (21 April 2011), at www.internetevolution.com/author.asp?section_id=697&doc_id=205850&f_src=internetevolution_gnews%3Cbr%20/%3E.Google Scholar
Science Daily. ‘Google flu trends estimates off, study finds’, at www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/05/100517101714.htm (last visited 27 July 2011).Google Scholar
Sky News. ‘Paedophiles target virtual world’ (31 October 2007), at http://news.sky.com/home/article/1290719.Google Scholar
Starr, S.Internet Freedom’, New Humanist, 117(1) (2002).Google Scholar
Statistic Brain. ‘Google annual search statistics’, at www.statisticbrain.com/google-searches/.Google Scholar
Stephens, M. ‘Only the powerful will benefit from the ‘right to be forgotten’’ (18 May 2014), at www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/18/powerful-benefit-right-to-be-forgotten.Google Scholar
Strom, S., and Helft, M.. ‘Google finds it hard to reinvent philanthropy’, at www.nytimes.com/2011/01/30/business/30charity.html?_r=1.Google Scholar
Telegraph. ‘Hitler downfall parodies: 25 worth watching’ (6 October 2009), at www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/6262709/Hitler-Downfall-parodies-25-worth-watching.html.Google Scholar
Tripathi, S. ‘How businesses have responded in Egypt’ (7 February 2011), at www.ihrb.org/commentary/staff/how_businesses_have_responded_in_egypt.html.Google Scholar
Tripathi, S. ‘How should internet and phone companies respond in Egypt?’ (4 February 2011), at www.ihrb.org/commentary/staff/internet_providers_in_egypt.html.Google Scholar
UN News Centre. ‘UN Human Rights Council endorses principles to ensure businesses respect human rights’ (16 June 2011), at www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=38742&Cr=human±rights&Cr1=.Google Scholar
Villelabeitia, I. ‘Turkey reinstates YouTube ban’ (3 November 2010), at www.reuters.com/article/2010/11/03/us-turkey-youtube-idUSTRE6A227C20101103.Google Scholar
Wearden, G. ‘Bank of England turns to Google to shed light on economic trends’ (13 June 2011), at www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/jun/13/bank-of-england-google-searches?intcmp=239.Google Scholar
WorldWideWebSize. ‘The size of the World Wide Web’, at www.worldwidewebsize.com/.Google Scholar
The British Board of Film Classification, at www.bbfc.co.uk.Google Scholar
Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, at www.business-humanrights.org/Home.Google Scholar
Canadian Centre for Child Protection Inc. at www.cybertip.ca/app/en/.Google Scholar
Center for Justice and Accountability, at http://cja.org/article.php?id=435.Google Scholar
The Danish Institute for Human Rights, at www.humanrights.dk/.Google Scholar
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, at www.bis.gov.uk/.Google Scholar
Electronic Frontier Foundation, at www.eff.org.Google Scholar
Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition, at www.eicc.info/.Google Scholar
European Digital Rights (EDRI), at www.edri.org/.Google Scholar
Freedom of Information (Archive), at www.foi.gov.uk.Google Scholar
Global Business Initiative on Human Rights, at www.global-business-initiative.org.Google Scholar
Global Movement for a Binding Treaty at www.treatymovement.com.Google Scholar
Google.org Initiative, at www.google.org.Google Scholar
Institute for Human Rights and Business, at www.ihrb.org.Google Scholar
Information Commissioner’s Office, at www.ico.gov.uk/.Google Scholar
The Intellectual Property Office, at www.ipo.gov.uk.Google Scholar
International Answer, at www.answercoalition.org.Google Scholar
International Standards Organization, at www.iso.org/iso/home.htm.Google Scholar
Internet Rights and Principles Coalition, at http://internetrightsandprinciples.org/.Google Scholar
The Internet Service Providers’ Association, at www.ispa.org.uk/.Google Scholar
Internet Watch Foundation, at www.iwf.org.uk.Google Scholar
Office of Communication (Ofcom), at www.ofcom.org.uk/about/.Google Scholar
The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, at www.ohchr.org/.Google Scholar
Office of the Information Commissioner of Canada, at www.oic-ci.gc.ca/eng/.Google Scholar
The Press Complaints Commission, at www.pcc.org.uk/.Google Scholar
Social Accountability International, at http://www.sa-intl.org/.Google Scholar
United for Peace and Justice, at www.unitedforpeace.org.Google Scholar
United Nations Global Compact, at www.unglobalcompact.org.Google Scholar
Akdeniz, Y.Internet Child Pornography and the Law (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008).Google Scholar
Auletta, K.Googled: The End of the World as We Know It (London: Virgin Books, 2010).Google Scholar
Ayres, I., and Braithwaite, J.. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate (Oxford University Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R., and Cave, M.. Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Balkan, J.The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power (London: Constable and Robinson Ltd., 2005).Google Scholar
Barendt, E.Freedom of Speech, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Benedek, W., and Kettemann, M. C.. Freedom of Expression and the Internet (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2013).Google Scholar
Benkler, Y.The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom (Yale University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Bernal, P.Internet Privacy Rights: Rights to Protect Autonomy (Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blowfield, M., and Murray, A.. Corporate Responsibility: A Critical Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J., and Drahos, P.. Global Business Regulation (Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand, S.The Media Lab: Inventing the Future at MIT (New York: Penguin Group, 1987).Google Scholar
Castells, M.The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society (Oxford University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castells, M.The Rise of the Network Society, 2nd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000).Google Scholar
Citron, D. K.Hate Crimes in Cyberspace (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapham, A.Human Rights in the Private Sphere (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, R., and Tomlinson, H.. The Law of Human Rights, 2nd edn, vol. 1 (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Coffee, J. C.Gatekeepers: The Role of the Professions in Corporate Governance (Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. A.Democracy and Its Critics (Yale University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Donnelly, J.Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice, 2nd edn (Cornell University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
de Sola Pool, I.Technologies of Freedom (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, T. I.The System of Freedom of Expression (New York: Random House, 1970).Google Scholar
Feintuck, M., and Varney, M.. Media Regulation, Public Interest and the Law (Edinburgh University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Fenwick, H., and Phillipson, Gavin. Media Freedom under the Human Rights Act (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Fiske, J.Television Culture (London: Routledge, 1987).Google Scholar
Friedman, M.Capitalism and Freedom (University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Gearty, C.Principles of Human Rights Adjudication (Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Habermas, J.Between Facts and Norms (MIT, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J., Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Habermas, J.Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (Translated Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Habermas, J.The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (Translated Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Harris, D. J. et al. Law of European Convention on Human Rights, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Heald, M.The Social Responsibilities of Business: Company and Community, 1900–1960 (Cleveland, OH: Press of Case Western Reserve University, 1970).Google Scholar
Jørgensen, R. F.Framing the Net: The Internet and Human Rights (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keen, A.The Cult of the Amateur (London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing, 2007).Google Scholar
Lessig, L.Code: Version 2.0 (New York: Basic Books, 2006).Google Scholar
Lessig, L.Code and other Laws of Cyberspace (New York: Basic Books, 1999).Google Scholar
Lord Lester of Herne Hill et al. Human Rights Law and Practice (London: Butterworths, 1999).Google Scholar
Lozano, J. M. et al. Governments and Corporate Social Responsibility: Public Policies beyond Regulation and Voluntary Compliance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, H. et al, Investigating the Information Society (London: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
MacKinnon, R.Consent of the Networked: The Worldwide Struggle for Internet Freedom (New York: Basic Books, 2012).Google Scholar
Marsden, C.Internet Co-Regulation: European Law, Regulatory Governance and Legitimacy in Cyberspace (Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer-Shönberger, V.Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age (Princeton University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Morgan, B., and Yeung, K.. An Introduction to Law and Regulation: Text and Materials (Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morozov, E.The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom (New York: Public Affairs, 2011).Google Scholar
Morsink, J.The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Origins, Drafting & Intent (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, A.Information Technology Law: The Law and Society (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Negroponte, N.Being Digital (New York: Vintage Books, 1995).Google Scholar
Norris, P.Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide (Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prosser, T.The Regulatory Enterprise: Government, Regulation, and Legitimacy (Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, J.Holding Corporations Accountable: Corporate Conduct, International Codes, and Citizen Action (London: Zed Books Ltd, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, J.Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2013).Google Scholar
Shoemaker, P.Gatekeeping (Communication Concepts) (Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991).Google Scholar
Shoemaker, P.Gatekeeping Theory (New York: Routledge, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. K. M.International Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R.Infotopia (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R.Republic.com (Princeton University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R.Republic.com 2.0 (Princeton University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Tambini, D. et al. Codifying Cyberspace (London: Routledge, 2008).Google Scholar
van Hoboken, J.Search Engine Freedom: On the Implications of the Right to Freedom of Expression for the Legal Governance of Web Search Services (Amsterdam: Kluwer Law International, 2012).Google Scholar
Wales, A.Big Business, Big Responsibilities (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, G. J.Human Rights in an Information Age: A Philosophical Analysis (University of Toronto Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, R. L.From Gutenberg to the Internet: Free Speech, Advancing Technology, and the Implications for Democracy (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Weber, R. H.Shaping Internet Governance: Regulatory Challenges (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, F.Theories of the Information Society, 2nd edn (London, Routledge, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zittrain, J.The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It (Yale University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Klang, M.Disruptive Technology (Doctoral Dissertation, unpublished, 2006).Google Scholar
Allison, J. E. (ed.). Technology, Development, and Democracy: International Conflict and Cooperation in the Information Age (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Boeger, N. et al. (eds.). Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility (Cheltenham, Eward Elgar, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownsword, R., and Yeung, K. (eds.). Regulating Technologies: Legal Future, Regulatory Frames and Technological Fixes (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008).Google Scholar
Calhoun, C. (ed.). Habermas and the Public Sphere (MIT Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Crane, A. et al. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. A. et al. (eds.). The Democracy Sourcebook (MIT Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Deibert, R. et al. (eds.). Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace (MIT Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deibert, R. et al. (eds.). Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering (MIT Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Sousa Santos, B., and Rodriguez-Garavito, C. A. (eds.). Law and Globalization from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality (Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deva, S., and Bilchitz, D. (eds.). Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect (Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dommering, E., and Asscher, L. (eds.). Coding Regulation (Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (ed.). Recrafting the Rule of Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999).Google Scholar
Edwards, L., and Waelde, C. (eds.). Law and the Internet, 3rd edn (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdelez, S. et al. (eds.). Theories of Information Behavior: A Researcher’s Guide (Medford, New Jersey: Information Today, 2005).Google Scholar
Feenberg, A., and Barney, D. (eds.). Community in the Digital Age: Philosophy and Practice (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2004).Google Scholar
Jørgensen, R. F. (ed.). Human Rights in the Global Information Society (MIT Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klang, M., and Murray, A. (eds.). Human Rights in the Digital Age (London: Cavendish Publishing, 2005).Google Scholar
Levmore, S., and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.). The Offensive Internet (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D., and Wajcman, J. (eds.). The Social Shaping of Technology, 2nd edn (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
McBarnet, D. et al. (eds.). The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Morgan, B. (ed.). The Intersection of Rights and Regulation: New Directions in Sociolegal Scholarship (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007).Google Scholar
Nissebaum, H., and Price, M. E. (eds.). Academy & Internet (New York: Peter Lang Publishing, 2004).Google Scholar
Ramcharan, B. G. (ed.). The Protection Role of National Human Rights Institutions (Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarikakis, K., and Thussu, D. K. (eds.). Ideologies of the Internet (Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Shane, P. M. (ed.). Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal through the Internet (New York: Routledge, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, R. (ed.). Business and Human Rights: Dilemmas and Solutions (Greenleaf, 2003).Google Scholar
Walker, C., and Weaver, R. L. (ed.). Free Speech in an Internet Era (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Webb, K. (ed.). Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest and Innovation (Carleton Research Unit for Innovation, Science and Environment, 2004).Google Scholar
Webster, F. (ed.). The Information Society Reader (London: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
Agre, P. E.The Practical Republic: Social Skills and the Progress of Citizenship’, in Feenberg, A. and Barney, D. (eds.), Community in the Digital Age: Philosophy and Practice (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2004).Google Scholar
Banisar, D.The Right to Information in the Age of Information’, in JØrgensen, R. F. (ed.), Human Rights in the Global Information Socie’ty (MIT Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Barzilai Nahon, K.Network Gatekeeping Theory’, in Erdelez, S. et al. (eds.), Theories of Information Behavior: A Researcher’s Guide (Medford, New Jersey: Information Today, 2005).Google Scholar
Bilchitz, D.A Chasm between “Is” and “Ought”? A Critique of the Normative Foundations of the SRSG’s Framework and the Guiding Principles’, in Deva, S. and Bilchitz, D. (eds.), Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Bohman, J.Expanding Dialogue: The Internet, Public Sphere, and Transnational Democracy’, in Shane, P. M. (ed.), Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal through the Internet (New York: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
Campbell, T.The Normative Grounding of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Human Rights Approach’, in McBarnet, D. et al. (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Carroll, A. B.A History of Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts and Practices’, in Crane, A. et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Deibert, R. J., and Villeneuve, N.. ‘Firewalls and Power: An Overview of Global State Censorship of the Internet’, in Klang, M. and Murray, A. (eds.), Human Rights in the Digital Age (London: Cavendish Publishing, 2005).Google Scholar
Esler, B. W.Filtering, Blocking and Rating: Chaperones and Censorship’, in Klang, M. and Murray, A. (eds.), Human Rights in the Digital Age (London: Cavendish Publishing, 2005).Google Scholar
Faris, R., and Villeneuve, N.. ‘Measuring Global Internet Filtering’, in Deibert, R. et al. (eds.), Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering (MIT Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Freeman, J.Private Parties, Public Functions and the New Administrative Law’, in Dyzenhaus, D. (ed.), Recrafting the Rule of Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999).Google Scholar
Froomkin, A. M.Technologies for Democracy’, in Shane, P. M. (ed.), Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal through the Internet (New York: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
Glinski, C.Corporate Codes of Conduct: Moral or Legal Obligation’, in McBarnet, D. et al. (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Johnson, D., and Bimber, B.. ‘The Internet and Political Transformation Revisited’, in Feenberg, A. and Barney, D. (eds.), Community in the Digital Age: Philosophy and Practice (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2004).Google Scholar
Kahn, R., and Kellner, D.. ‘Virtually Democratic: Online Communities and Internet Activism’, in Feenberg, A. and Barney, D. (eds.), Community in the Digital Age: Philosophy and Practice (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2004).Google Scholar
Kedzie, C. R., and Aaragon, J.. ‘Coincident Revolutions and the Dictator’s Dilemma: Thoughts on Communication and Democratization’, in Allison, J. E. (ed.), Technology, Development, and Democracy: International Conflict and Cooperation in the Information Age (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Kinley, D. et al. ‘“The Norms Are Dead! Long Life the Norms!” The Politics behind the UN Human Rights Norms for Corporations’, in McBarnet, D. et al. (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Lambers, R.Code and Speech. Speech Control through Network Architecture’, in Dommering, E. and Asscher, L. (eds.), Coding Regulation (Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Leiter, B.Cleaning Cyber-Cesspools: Google and Free Speech’, in Levmore, S. and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.), The Offensive Internet (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Lopez, C.The “Ruggie Process”: From Legal Obligations to Corporate Social Responsibility?’, in Deva, S. and Bilchitz, D. (eds.), Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
McBarnet, D.Corporate Social Responsibility beyond Law, through Law, for Law: The New Corporate Accountability’, in McBarnet, D. et al. (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Maclay, C, ‘Protecting Privacy and Expression Online: Can the Global Network Initiative embrace the character of the Net?’, in Deibert, R. et al. (eds.), Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace (MIT Press, 2010).Google Scholar
McIntyre, T., and Scott, C.. ‘Internet Filtering: Rhetoric, Legitimacy, Accountability and Responsibility’, in Brownsword, R. and Yeung, K. (eds.), Regulating Technologies: Legal Future, Regulatory Frames and Technological Fixes (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008).Google Scholar
Morrison, A., and Webb, K.. ‘Bicycle Helmets and Hockey Helmet Regulations: Two Approaches to Safety Protection’, in Webb, K. (ed.), Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest and Innovation (Carleton Research Unit for Innovation, Science and Environment, 2004).Google Scholar
Muchlinski, P.The Development of Human Rights Responsibilities for Multinational Enterprises’, in Sullivan, R. (ed.), Business and Human Rights: Dilemmas and Solutions (Greenleaf, 2003).Google Scholar
Murdoch, S. J., and Anderson, R.. ‘Tools and Technology of Internet Filtering’, in Deibert, R. et al. (eds.), Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering (MIT Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Nolan, J.The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: Soft Law or Not Law?’, in Deva, S. and Bilchitz, D. (eds.), Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Noveck, B. S.Unchat: Democratic Solution for a Wired World’, in Shane, P. M. (ed.), Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal through the Internet (New York: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar
Parker, C.Meta-Regulation: Legal Accountability for Corporate Social Responsibility’, in McBarnet, D. et al. (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Pinter, A., and Oblak, T.. ‘Is There a Public Sphere in This Discussion Forum?’, in Sarikakis, K. and Thussu, D. K. (eds.), Ideologies of the Internet (Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Riefa, C., and Hornle, J.. ‘The Changing Face of Electronic Consumer Contracts in the Twenty-First Century: Fit for Purpose?’, in Edwards, L. and Waelde, C. (eds.), Law and the Internet, 3rd edn (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009).Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, R.How Will the Net’s History Be Written? Historians and the Internet’, in Nissebaum, H. and Price, M. E. (eds.), Academy & Internet (New York: Peter Lang Publishing, 2004).Google Scholar
Rowland, D.Free Expression and Defamation’, in Klang, M. and Murray, A. (eds.), Human Rights in the Digital Age (London: Cavendish Publishing, 2005).Google Scholar
Raseroka, K.Access to Information and Knowledge’, in Jørgensen, R. F. (ed.), Human Rights in the Global Information Society (MIT Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Rundle, M., and Birdling, M.. ‘Filtering and the International System: A Question of Commitment’, in Deibert, R. et al. (eds.), Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering (MIT Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Scott, C.Reflexive Governance, Meta-Regulation, and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Heineken Effect’, in Boeger, N. et al. (eds.), Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility (Cheltenham, Eward Elgar, 2008).Google Scholar
Shamir, R.Corporate Social Responsibility: A Case of Hegemony and Counter-Hegemony’, in De Sousa Santos, B. and Rodriguez-Garavito, C. A. (eds.), Law and Globalization from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Vegh, S.Profit over Principles: The Commercialization of the Democratic Potentials of the Internet’, in Sarikakis, K. and Thussu, D. K. (eds.), Ideologies of the Internet (Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Vick, D.Regulating Hatred’, in Klang, M. and Murray, A. (eds.), Human Rights in the Digital Age (London: Cavendish Publishing, 2005).Google Scholar
Voilescu, A.Changing Paradigms of Corporate Criminal Responsibility: Lessons for Corporate Social Responsibility’, in McBarnet, D. et al. (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Webb, K.Understanding the Voluntary Codes Phenomenon’, in Webb, K. (ed.), Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest and Innovation (Carleton Research Unit for Innovation, Science and Environment, 2004).Google Scholar
Webb, K., and Morrison, A.. ‘The Law and Voluntary Codes: Examining the “Tangled Web”’, in Webb, K. (ed.), Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest and Innovation (Carleton Research Unit for Innovation, Science and Environment, 2004).Google Scholar
Weber, L. M., and Murray, S.. ‘Interactivity: Equality, and the Prospects for Electronic Democracy: A Review’, in Sarikakis, K. and Thussu, D. K. (eds.), Ideologies of the Internet (Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Winner, L.Do Artifacts Have Politics?’, in the MacKenzie, D. and Wajcman, J. (eds.), The Social Shaping of Technology, 2nd edn (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Akdeniz, Y.To Block or Not to Block: European Approaches to Content Regulation, and Implications for Freedom of Expression’, CLSR, 26 (2010) 260.Google Scholar
Ammori, M. ‘First Amendment Architecture’, Wis. L. Rev. (2012) 1.Google Scholar
Balkin, J. M.The Future of Free Expression in the Digital Age’, Pepp. L. Rev. 36 (2008) 101.Google Scholar
Balkin, J. M.Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society’, NYULR, 79(1) (2004) 1.Google Scholar
Barber, B. R.Three Scenarios for the Future of Technology and Strong Democracy’, PSQ, 113(4) (1998–99) 573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, B. R.Which Technology for Which Democracy? Why Democracy for Which Technology?’, IJCLP, 6 (2001) 1.Google Scholar
Barzilai-Nahon, K.Gatekeeping Revisited: A Critical Review’, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 43 (2009) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barzilai-Nahon, K.Toward a Theory of Network Gatekeeping: A Framework for Exploring Information Control’, JASIST, 59(9) (2008) 1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barzilai-Nahon, K.Gatekeepers, Virtual Communities and the Gated: Multidimensional Tensions in Cyberspace’, Int’l J. Comm. L. & Pol’y, 11(9) (2006) 1.Google Scholar
Ben-Ishai, S.Corporate Gatekeeper Liability in Canada’, Tex. Intl. L. J., 42 (2007) 443.Google Scholar
Benjamin, S. M.Algorithms and Speech’, U. PA. L. Rev. 161(6) (2013) 1445.Google Scholar
Benkler, Y.From Consumers to Users: The Deeper Structures of Regulation Toward Sustainable Commons and User Access’, Fed. Comm. L. J. 52 (2000) 561.Google Scholar
Benkler, Y. et al. ‘Social Mobilization and the Networked Public Sphere: Mapping the SOPA-PIPA Debate’ (July 2013), The Berkman Center for Internet & Society Research Publication Series No. 2013–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, M.The Deep Web: Surfacing Hidden Value’, J. Electron. Publ., 7(1) (2001) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J.Decentring Regulation: Understanding the Role of Regulation and Self-Regulation in a “Post-Regulatory” World’, CLP, 54 (2001) 103.Google Scholar
Bracha, O., and Pasquale, F.. ‘Federal Search Commission? Access, Fairness and Accountability in the Law of Search’, Cornell L. R. 93 (2008) 1149.Google Scholar
Chandler, J. A.A Right to Reach an Audience: An Approach to Intermediary Bias on the Internet’, Hofstra L. Rev. 35(3) (2007) 101.Google Scholar
Cortes, P., and De la Rosa, F. E.. ‘Building a Global Redress System for Low-Value Cross-Border Disputes’, Intl. & Comp. L. Q. 62(2) (2013) 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlberg, L.Democracy via Cyberspace’, New Media & Society, 3(2) (2001) 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlgren, P.The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation’, Political Communication, 22 (2005) 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darian-Smith, E., and Scott, C.. ‘Regulation and Human Rights in Socio-Legal Scholarship’, Law and Policy, 31(3) (2009) 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Hert, P., and Kloza, D.. ‘Internet (Access) as a New Fundamental Right. Inflating the Current Rights Framework?’, EJLT, 3(3) (2012).Google Scholar
Doane, D.The Myth of CSR: The Problem with Assuming That Companies Can Do Well While Also Doing Good Is That Markets Don’t Really Work That Way’, SSIR, 3(3) (2005) 23.Google Scholar
Edwards, L.From Child Porn to China, in One Cleanfeed’, Script-ed, 3(3) (2006) 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkin-Koren, N.Let the Crawlers Crawl: On Virtual Gatekeepers and the Right to Exclude Indexing’, U. Dayton L. Rev. 26 (2000) 179.Google Scholar
Froomkin, A. M.Habermas@Discourse.Net: Towards a Critical Theory of Cyberspace’, HLR, 116(3) (2003) 751.Google Scholar
Garnham, N.Information Society Theory as Ideology’ (1998) 21(1) Loisir et Societe97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasser, U. ‘Responsibility for Human Rights Violations, Acts or Omissions, within the “Sphere of Influence” of Companies’, Working Paper Series (December 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, E.Search Engine Bias and the Demise of Search Engine Utopianism’, YJLT, 8 (2005–6) 188.Google Scholar
Grimmelmann, J.The Google Dilemma’, N. Y. L. School L. Rev., 53 (2008/2009) 939.Google Scholar
Grimmelmann, J. ‘Speech Engines’, U. Md. Francis King Carey School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014–11 (2014) 867.Google Scholar
Habermas, J.Human Rights and Popular Sovereignty: The Liberal and Republican Versions’, Ratio Juris, 7(1) (1994) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J.Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research’, Communication Theory, 16 (2006) 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halcli, A., and Webster, F.. ‘Inequality and Mobilization in the Information Age’ (2000) 3(1) European Journal of Social Theory67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heverly, R.Breaking the Internet: International Efforts to Play the Middle against the Ends: A Way Forward’, Georgetown J. of Intl. L. 42(4) (2011) 1083.Google Scholar
Heverly, R. A. ‘Law as Intermediary’, Mich. St. L. Rev (2006) 107.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, M., and Koops, B.. ‘The Challenges of Ambient Law and Legal Protection in the Profiling Era’, MLR, 73(3) (2010) 428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, P. N., and Hussain, M. M.. ‘The Upheavals in Egypt and Tunisia: The Role of Digital Media’, Journal of Democracy, 22(3) (2011) 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. R., and Post, D. G.. ‘Law and Borders – The Rise of Law in Cyberspace’ (1996), at www.temple.edu/lawschool/dpost/Borders.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julia-Barcelo, , and Koelman, K. J., ‘Intermediary Liability in the E-Commerce Directive: So Far So Good, But It’s Not Enough’, CLSR, 16(4) (2004) 231.Google Scholar
Katyal, S. K.Semiotic Disobedience’, Wash. U. L. Rev. 84(2) (2006) 489.Google Scholar
Kohl, U.Google: The Rise and Rise of Online Intermediaries in the Governance of the Internet and Beyond (Part 2)’, IJILT, 21(2) (2013) 187.Google Scholar
Kohl, U.The Rise and Rise of Online Intermediaries in the Governance of the Internet and Beyond – Connectivity Intermediaries’, IRLCT 26(2) (2011) 185.Google Scholar
Kraakman, R. H.Corporate Liability Strategies and the Costs of Legal Controls’, Yale L. J. 93 (1983–1985) 857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraakman, R. H.Gatekeepers: The Anatomy of a Third-Party Enforcement Strategy’, J. L. Econ. & Org. 2 (1986) 53.Google Scholar
Kreimer, S. F.Censorship By Proxy: First Amendment, Internet Intermediaries, and the Problem of the Weakest Link’, U. Pa. L. Rev. 155 (2006–2007) 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laidlaw, E. B.A Framework for Identifying Internet Information Gatekeepers’, IRLCT, 43(3) (2010) 263.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, E. B.Private Power, Public Interest: An Examination of Search Engine Accountability’, IJLIT, 17 (1) (2009) 113.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, E.The Responsibilities of Free Speech Regulators: An Analysis of the Internet Watch Foundation’, IJILT, 20(4) (2012) 312.Google Scholar
Lewin, K.Frontiers in Group Dynamics’, Human Relations, 1(2) (1947) 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lievens, E. et al. ‘The Co-Protection of Minors in New Media: A European Approach to Co-Regulation’, U. C. Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol’y, 10 (2006) 98.Google Scholar
Longford, G., and Patten, S.. ‘Democracy in the Age of the Internet’, UNBLJ, 56 (2007) 5.Google Scholar
Mac Síthigh, D.‘App Law Within: Rights and Regulation in the Smartphone Age’, IJILT, 21(2) (2013) 154.Google Scholar
Mac Síthigh, D.The Fragmentation of Intermediary Liability in the UK’, JIPLP, 8(7) (2013) 521.Google Scholar
Mac Síthigh, D.Virtual Walls? The Law of Pseudo-Public Spaces’, Int. J. L. C. 8(3) (2012) 394.Google Scholar
Mann, R. J., and Belzley, S. R.. ‘The Promise of Internet Intermediary Liability’, W. M. & Mary L. Rev. 47 (2005) 239.Google Scholar
Manokha, I.Business Ethics and the Spirit of Global Capitalism: Moral Leadership in the Context of Global Hegemony’, Journal of Global Ethics, 2(1) (2006) 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manokha, I.Corporate Social Responsibility: A New Signifier? An Analysis of Business Ethics and Good Business Practice’, Politics, 24(1) (2004) 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCorquodale, R.Corporate Social Responsibility and International Human Rights Law’, Journal of Business Ethics, 87 (2009) 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCorquodale, R., and Fairbrother, R.. ‘Globalization and Human Rights’, Hum. Rts. Q. 21(3)) (1999) 735.Google Scholar
Metoyer-Duran, C.Information Gatekeepers’, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 28 (1993) 111.Google Scholar
Murray, A.Nodes and Gravity in Virtual Space’, Legisprudence, 5(2) (2011) 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, A.Symbiotic Regulation’, J. Marshall J. of Computer & Info. L. 26(2) (2009) 207.Google Scholar
Murray, A., and Scott, C.. ‘Regulating New Media’, MLR, 65 (2002) 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okoye, A.Theorising Corporate Social Responsibility as an Essentially Contested Concept: Is a Definition Necessary?’, J. Bus. Ethics, 89 (2009) 613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orgad, S.The Cultural Dimensions of Online Communication: A Study of Breast Cancer Patients’ Internet Spaces’, New Media & Society, 8(6) (2006) 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palfrey, J. G.Four Phases of Internet Regulation’, Social Research, 77(3) (Fall 2010).Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Z.The Virtual Sphere: The Internet as a Public Sphere’, New Media & Society, 4(1) (2002) 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasquale, F.Asterisk Revisited: Debating a Right of Reply on Search Results’, J. Bus. & Tech. L. 3 (2008) 61.Google Scholar
Pasquale, F.Rankings, Reductionalism and Responsibility’, Clev. St. L. Rev. 54 (2006) 115.Google Scholar
Patterson, M. R. ‘Google and Search-Engine Market Power’, Harvard Journal Law and Technology Occasional Paper Series (2013) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picciotto, S.Rights, Responsibilities and Regulation of International Business’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 42 (2003) 131.Google Scholar
Pitts, C., and Sherman, J.. ‘Human Rights Corporate Accountability Guide: From Laws to Norms to Values’, Working Paper No. 51, Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative (December 2008).Google Scholar
Price, V. et al. ‘Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion?’, Political Communication, 19(1) (2002) 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reidenberg, J. R.Lex Informatica: The Formulation of Information Policy Rules through Technology’, Tex. L. R. 76(3) (1998) 553.Google Scholar
Rowbottom, J.To Rant, Vent and Converse: Protecting Low Level Digital Speech’, CLJ, 71(2) (2012) 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, A. G., and Palazzo, G.. ‘Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Social Responsibility: Business and Society Seen from a Habermasian Perspective’, Academy of Management Review, 32(4) (2007) 1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, W. et al. ‘Search Engines as Gatekeepers of Public Communication: An Analysis of the German Framework Applicable to Internet Search Engines Including Media Law and Anti Trust Law’, German Law Journal, 6(1) (2005) 1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, C.Accountability in The Regulatory State’, Journal of Law and Society, 27(1) (2000) 38.Google Scholar
Seyfert, C.25 Clauses of Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service Are Legally Void’, E. C. L. Rep. 14(1) (2014), 23.Google Scholar
Sheehy, B.Understanding CSR: An Empirical Study of Private Self-Regulation’, Monash Law Review, 38(2) (2011) 1.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, P. et al. ‘Individual and Routine Forces in Gatekeeping’, J&MC Quarterly, 78(2 (2001) 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P.The Politics of UK Television Policy: The Making of Ofcom’, Media Culture & Society, 28(6) (2006) 929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutter, G.“Nothing New under the Sun”: Old Fear and New Media’, IJLIT, 8 (2000), 338.Google Scholar
Van Couvering, E.Is Relevance Relevant? Market, Science, and War: Discourses of Search Engine Quality’, J. Comput.-Mediat. Comm. 12(3) (2007) 866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Eijk, N.Search Engines: Seek and Ye Shall Find? The Position of Search Engines in Law’, Iris plus, 2 (2006) 1.Google Scholar
Votaw, D.Genius Became Rare: A Comment on the Doctrine of Social Responsibility Pt 1’, Calif. Manage. Rev. 15(2) (1972) 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, T.Machine Speech’, U. PA. L. Rev. 161(6) (2013) 1495.Google Scholar
Zittrain, J.A History of Online Gatekeeping’, Harv. J. L. & Tech. 19(2) (2006) 253.Google Scholar
Zittrain, J.Internet Points of Control’, B. C. L. Rev. 44 (2002) 653.Google Scholar
Ahlert, C. et al. ‘How “liberty” disappeared from cyberspace: the mystery shopper tests internet content self-regulation’, at http://pcmlp.socleg.ox.ac.uk/sites/pcmlp.socleg.ox.ac.uk/files/liberty.pdf.Google Scholar
Bayer, J.Liability of internet service providers for third party content’, Victoria University Wellington Working Paper Series, 1 (2008) 1.Google Scholar
Best, M. L., and Wade, K. W.. ‘The internet and democracy: global catalyst or democratic dud’ (Research Publication No. 2005–12: Berkman Center, 2005).Google Scholar
Brown, I.Internet self-regulation and fundamental rights’, Index on Censorship, 1 (2010) 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, I., and Korff, D.. ‘Digital freedoms in international law: practical steps to protect human rights online’ (June 2012) (report commissioned by the Global Network Initiative).Google Scholar
Business Leaders Initiative on Human Rights, United Nations Global Compact and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. ‘A guide for integrating human rights into business management I’.Google Scholar
Business Leaders Initiative on Human Rights, United Nations Global Compact and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. ‘A guide for integrating human rights into business management II’.Google Scholar
Canadian Centre for Child Protection. Child sexual abuse images: an analysis of websites by cybertip.ca (November 2009).Google Scholar
Communication. ‘Implementing the Partnership for Growth and Jobs: Making Europe a Pole of Excellence on Corporate Social Responsibility’, COM (2006) 136.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. ‘Building a Free and Safe Internet’, Submission to the Internet Governance Forum, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 12–15 November 2007.Google Scholar
Council of Europe and European Internet Service Providers Association. ‘Human rights guidelines for Internet service providers’, at www.coe.int/t/informationsociety/documents/HRguidelines_ISP_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Council of Europe and the Interactive Software Federation of Europe. ‘Human rights guidelines for online game providers’, at www.coe.int/t/informationsociety/documents/HRguidelines_OGP_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. Recommendation CM/Rec(2008)6 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on measures to promote the respect for freedom of expression and information with regard to internet filters (March 2008).Google Scholar
Clayton, R. ‘Failures in a hybrid content blocking system’, at www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rnc1/cleanfeed.pdf.Google Scholar
The Department of Trade and Industry. DTI Consultation Document on the Electronic Commerce Directive: The Liability of Hyperlinkers, Location Tools Services and Content Aggregators (June 2005), at http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20090609003228/http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file13986.pdf.Google Scholar
Edelman, B., and Lockwood, B.. ‘Measuring bias in “organic” web search’, at www.benedelman.org/searchbias/.Google Scholar
Equality and Human Rights Commission. Submission to the 10th International Conference of NHRIs (Session 6 on 9 October 2010), The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights.Google Scholar
European Commission. Communication on Internet Policy and Governance Europe’s role in shaping the future of Internet Governance COM/2014/072.Google Scholar
European Commission. ‘A Coherent Framework for Building Trust in the Digital Single Market for E-Commerce and Online Services’, COM(2011) 942.Google Scholar
European Commission. ‘A Renewed EU strategy 2011–14 for Corporate Social Responsibility’, COM(2011) 681.Google Scholar
European Commission. ‘European Governance: A White Paper’,COM(2001) 428 (25 July 2001).Google Scholar
European Multi-Stakeholder Forum on CSR: Final Results and Recommendations (29 June 2004).Google Scholar
Frankental, P., and House, F.. ‘Human Rights – Is It Any of Your Business?’ (2000) Amnesty International.Google Scholar
Green Paper. ‘Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility’, COM (2001) 366.Google Scholar
HM Government. Corporate Responsibility Report (BERR, February 2009).Google Scholar
HM Government. Corporate Social Responsibility: A Government Update (DTI, May 2004).Google Scholar
HM Government. Good Business: Implementing the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (September 2013).Google Scholar
House of Commons, Justice Committee. The Functions, Powers and Resources of the Information Commissioner, Ninth Report of Session 2012–13 (12 March 2013), at www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmjust/962/962.pdf.Google Scholar
Human Rights Council. ‘Elaboration of an international legally binding instrument on Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises with respect to Human Rights’ (A/HRC/26/L.22), at http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/LTD/G14/064/48/PDF/G1406448.pdf?OpenElement.Google Scholar
Information Commissioner’s Office. Data Protection and the Press – Framework Consultation on Proposed ICO Code of Practice, at http://ico.org.uk/news/blog/2013/~/media/documents/library/Data_Protection/Research_and_reports/framework-consultation-summary-of-responses.pdf.Google Scholar
Information Commissioner’s Office. The Information Commissioner’s Response to the Leveson Report, at http://ico.org.uk/news/~/media/documents/consultation_responses/ico_response_to_leveson_report_012013.ashx (last visited 2 April 2014).Google Scholar
International Council on Human Rights Policy. Beyond Voluntarism: Human Rights and the Developing International Legal Obligations of Companies (February 2002), at www.ichrp.org/files/reports/7/107_report_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Internet Watch Foundation. Annual and Charity Report 2013, at www.iwf.org.uk/accountability/annual-reports/2013-annual-report.Google Scholar
Internet Watch Foundation. 2012 Annual and Charity Report, at www.iwf.org.uk/accountability/annual-reports/2011-annual-report (last visited 27 June 2014).Google Scholar
Internet Watch Foundation. 2008 Annual and Charity Report, at www.iwf.org.uk/accountability/annual-reports/2008-annual-report.Google Scholar
Internet Watch Foundation, Annual and Charity Report 2006.Google Scholar
Joint Committee on Human Rights. Any of Our Business? Human Rights and the UK Private Sector (First Reports of Session 2009–10), vol. I.Google Scholar
Joint Committee on Human Rights. Any of Our Business? Human Rights and the UK Private Sector (First Reports of Session 2009–10), vol. II.Google Scholar
Joint Committee on Human Rights. Equality and Human Rights Commission (Thirteenth Report of Session 2009–10).Google Scholar
Laidlaw, E. ‘Unraveling Intermediary Liability’, presented at British and Irish Law, Education and Technology (University of East Anglia, April 2014), at www.laidlaw.eu/2014/06/unraveling-intermediary-liability/.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, E.What is a joke? The role of social media providers in regulating speech’, presented at The Legal Challenges of Social Media to Freedom of Expression (University of Leicester, December 2013), at www.laidlaw.eu/2014/06/what-is-a-joke-the-role-of-social-media-providers-in-regulating-speech/.Google Scholar
McIntyre, T. J. ‘Intermediaries, Invisibility and the Rule of Law’, BILETA Conference Paper (2008).Google Scholar
Monash University Castan Centre for Human Rights Law. Human Rights Translated: A Business Reference Guide.Google Scholar
Nahon, K. et al. ‘Information flows in events of political unrest’ at www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/39165/259.pdf?sequence=4.Google Scholar
Ntoulas, A. et al. ‘Downloading hidden content’, at http://oak.cs.ucla.edu/~cho/papers/ntoulas-hidden.pdf.Google Scholar
OECD Watch. 10 Years On: Assessing the Contribution of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises to Responsible Business Conduct.Google Scholar
Office of the Privacy Commissioner. ‘The case for reforming the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act’ (May 2013), at https://www.priv.gc.ca/parl/2013/pipeda_r_201305_e.pdf.Google Scholar
Office of the United Nations Commissioner for Human Rights. Business and Human Rights: A Progress Report (2000), at www2.ohchr.org/english/about/publications/docs/business.htm.Google Scholar
Palfrey, J. G. Jr.Reluctant Gatekeepers: Corporate Ethics on a Filtered Internet’, in Global Information Technology Report (World Economic Forum: 2006–2007).Google Scholar
Promoting a European Framework for corporate social responsibility, Green Paper (Employment & Social Affairs, 2001).Google Scholar
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee. First Report on the Application of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (Directive on electronic commerce).Google Scholar
Report of the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of expression, Frank La Rue to the United Nations General Assembly, 16 May 2011, at www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Opinion/A.66.290.pdf.Google Scholar
Rt Hon Lord McNally. Letter. The Functions, Powers and Resources of the Information Commissioner: Government Response to the Committee’s Ninth Report of Session 2012–13 (30 June 2013), at www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmjust/560/56004.htm.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. ‘Business and human rights: Further steps towards the operationalization of the “protect, respect and remedy” framework’ (April 2010), at www.reports-and-materials.org/Ruggie-report-2010.pdf (last visited 5 August 2011).Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. ‘Business and human rights: towards operationalizing the “protect, respect and remedy” framework’ (2009), at www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/11session/A.HRC.11.13.pdf.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. ‘Guiding principles on business and human rights: implementing the United Nations “protect, respect and remedy” framework’ (March 2011), at www.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/ruggie/ruggie-guiding-principles-21-mar-2011.pdf.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. ‘Protect, respect and remedy: a framework for business and human rights: Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises’ (2008), at www.reports-and-materials.org/Ruggie-report-7-Apr-2008.pdf.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. ‘State obligations to provide access to remedy for human rights abuses by third parties, including business: an overview of international and regional provisions, commentary and decisions’ (Addendum) (2009), at www.reports-and-materials.org/Ruggie-addendum-15-May-2009.doc.Google Scholar
Safer Children in a Digital World: The Report of the Byron Review (Crown copyright, 2008).Google Scholar
Twentyfifty. The Private Sector and Human Rights in the UK (October 2009).Google Scholar
UK Government. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A Government Update’ (DTI, May 2004).Google Scholar
United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: An Interpretive Guide (2012).Google Scholar
United Nations Global Compact. Corporate Citizenship in the World Economy (October 2008).Google Scholar
Utting, P. ‘Rethinking business regulation: from self-regulation to social control’, Technology, Business and Society Programme Paper Number 15, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (2005).Google Scholar
van Eijk, N.Search Engines, the New Bottleneck for Content Access, Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012–21.Google Scholar
Verbiest, T. et al. Study on the Liability of Internet Intermediaries, Markt/2006/09/E (November 2007), at http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/e-commerce/docs/study/liability/final_report_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Volokh, E., and Falk, D. M.. ‘First Amendment protection for search engine search results’ (white paper commissioned by Google) (2012), at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2055364.Google Scholar
Walker, C., and Akdeniz, Y.. ‘The governance of the Internet in Europe with special reference to illegal and harmful content’, at www.cyber-rights.org/documents/CrimLR_ya_98.pdf.Google Scholar
Westminster eForum. Transcript. Taming the Wild Web? – Online Content Regulation (London: 11 February 2009).Google Scholar
Wild, L.Democracy in the Age of Modern Communications: An Outline (2008) Paper for Freedom of Expression Project, Global Partners & Associates.Google Scholar
Interview with Fry, Stephen, at http://www.videojug.com/interview/stephen-fry-web-20 (last visited 22 July 2011).Google Scholar
Agence France-Press. ‘Russia censors media by blocking websites and popular blog’ (4 March 2014) at www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/14/russia-bans-alexei-navalny-blog-opposition-news-websites.Google Scholar
Alexander, A. ‘Internet role in Egypt’s protests’ (9 February 211), at www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12400319.Google Scholar
Almunia, J. Speech/12/372, ‘Statement of VP Almunia on the Google antitrust investigation’ (21 May 2012), at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-12-372_en.htm.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. Public statement. ‘Amnesty International involvement with the internet multi stakeholder initiative’ (29 October 2008), at www.amnesty.org/ar/library/asset/POL30/009/2008/es/1c327fdf-a67c-11dd-966b-0da92cc4cb95/pol300092008en.pdf.Google Scholar
Anderson, S. et al. ‘Top 200: the rise of corporate global power’ (4 December 2000), at http://corpwatch.org/article.php?id=377.Google Scholar
Annan, K. A. ‘Break the technology barrier – the world information summit’ (9 December 2003), at (9 December 2003), at www.nytimes.com/2003/12/09/opinion/09iht-edannan_ed3_.html.Google Scholar
Arthur, C. ‘Google faces deluge of requests to wipe details from search index’ (4 May 2014), at www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/may/15/hundreds-google-wipe-details-search-index-right-forgotten.Google Scholar
Barlow, J. P. ‘Selling wine without bottles: economy of mind on the global net’ (March 1994), at http://virtualschool.edu/mon/ElectronicFrontier/WineWithoutBottles.html.Google Scholar
Barrett, T. ‘To censor pro-union website, Telus blocked 766 others’ (4 August 2005), at www.labournet.net/world/0508/canada2.html.Google Scholar
The BBC. ‘Child abuse “big business online”’ (13 May 2010), at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/10108720.stm.Google Scholar
The BBC. ‘Internet access is a “fundamental rights”’ (8 March 2010), at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8548190.stm.Google Scholar
The BBC. ‘Luminaries look to the future web’, at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7373717.stm.Google Scholar
The BBC. ‘Online pornography to be blocked by default, PM announces’ (22 July 2013), at www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23401076.Google Scholar
The BBC. ‘Quango list shows 192 to be axed’ (14 October 2010), at www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11538534.Google Scholar
Beckett, C. ‘SuperMedia: the future as “networked journalism”’ (10 June 2008), at www.opendemocracy.net/article/supermedia-the-networked-journalism-future.Google Scholar
Beckett, C. ‘State 2.0: a new front end?’ (7 September 2009), at www.opendemocracy.net/article/state-2-0-a-new-front-end.Google Scholar
Bello, O. ‘The Kimberley Process risks becoming irrelevant to cogent concerns’ (28 October 2013), at www.saiia.org.za/opinion-analysis/the-kimberley-process-risks-becoming-irrelevant-to-cogent-concerns.Google Scholar
Bennett-Smith, M. ‘Facebook vows to crack down on rape joke pages after successful protest, boycott’ (29 May 2013), at www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/29/facebook-rape-jokes-protest_n_3349319.html.Google Scholar
Berners-Lee, T. et al. ‘The Semantic Web’ (17 May 2001), at www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-semantic-web.Google Scholar
Cain, M. ‘Why does the PCC pretend it can do something about phone hacking?’ (31 January 2011), at http://pccwatch.co.uk/why-does-the-pcc-pretend-about-phone-hacking/.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. Prime Minister’s speech. ‘The internet and pornography: Prime Minister calls for action’ (22 July 2013), at www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-internet-and-pornography-prime-minister-calls-for-action.Google Scholar
Cerf, V. ‘Internet access is not a human rights’ (4 January 2012), at www.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/opinion/internet-access-is-not-a-human-right.html?_r=0.Google Scholar
Change.org. ‘We need women on British banknotes’, at www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/we-need-women-on-british-banknotes.Google Scholar
CNN World. ‘“Neda” becomes rallying cry for Iranian protests’ (21 June 2009), at http://articles.cnn.com/2009-06-21/world/iran.woman.twitter_1_neda-peaceful-protest-cell-phone?_s=PM:WORLD.Google Scholar
comScore. ‘ComScore releases January 2014 U. S. search engine rankings’ (18 February 2014), at www.comscore.com/Insights/Press_Releases/2014/2/comScore_Releases_January_2014_US_Search_Engine_Rankings.Google Scholar
Crete-Nishihata, M. ‘Egypt’s internet blackout: extreme example of just-in-time blocking’ (28 January 2011), at http://opennet.net/blog/2011/01/egypt%E2%80%99s-internet-blackout-extreme-example-just-time-blocking.Google Scholar
Curtis, S. ‘BT forces porn filter choice’ (16 December 2013), at www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/internet-security/10520537/BT-forces-porn-filter-choice.html.Google Scholar
Davies, L. ‘Facebook refuses to take down rape joke pages’ (30 September 2011), at www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/sep/30/facebook-refuses-pull-rape-jokepages.Google Scholar
Davies, C. J. ‘The hidden censors of the Internet’, Wired Magazine (June 2006), at www.wired.co.uk/wired-magazine/archive/2009/05/features/the-hidden-censors-of-the-internet.aspx?page=all.Google Scholar
D’Jaen, M. ‘Global Initiative to protect net privacy and freedoms launched’, e-commerce law & policy (December 2008), at www.perkinscoie.com/files/upload/PRIV_09-01_Article_Jaen.pdf.Google Scholar
Downes, L. ‘Why no one will join the Global Network Initiative’ (30 March 2011), at www.forbes.com/sites/larrydownes/2011/03/30/why-no-one-will-join-the-global-network-initiative/.Google Scholar
Electronic Frontier Foundation. Commentary. ‘Everyone who’s made a Hitler parody video, leave the room’ (20 April 2010), at www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/04/everyone-who-s-made-hitler-parody-leave-room.Google Scholar
Electronic Frontier Foundation. ‘GNI resignation letter’, at www.eff.org/document/gni-resignation-letter.Google Scholar
Electronic Frontier Foundation. Letter, at www.eff.org/files/filenode/gni/signon_letter.txt.Google Scholar
Enge, E. ‘6 Major Google changes reveal the future of SEO’ (30 December 2013), at http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2301719/6-Major-Google-Changes-Reveal-the-Future-of-SEO.Google Scholar
European Commission. IP/14/116, ‘Antitrust: commission obtains from Google comparable display of specialised search rivals’ (5 February 2014), at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-116_en.htm.Google Scholar
European Commission. IP/13/371, ‘Antitrust: commission seeks feedback on commitments offered by Google to address competition concerns’ (25 April 2013), at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-371_en.htm.Google Scholar
European Commission. Statement, ‘Statement by Commissioner Vestager on Google antitrust investigations at the European Parliament (ECON committee meeting)’ (11 November 2014), at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_STATEMENT-14-1646_en.htm.Google Scholar
Facebook. ‘How to report things’, at www.facebook.com/help/181495968648557.Google Scholar
Fallows, D. ‘Election newshounds speak up: newspaper, TV, and internet fans tell how and why they differ’, The Pew Research Center (6 February 2007), at http://pewresearch.org/pubs/406/election-newshounds-speak-up.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, L. et al. ‘The semantic web in action’, Scientific American (Dec 2007), reproduced with permission, at www.thefigtrees.net/lee/sw/sciam/semantic-web-in-action.Google Scholar
Fiveash, K. ‘Google disappears torrent terms from autocomplete search results’ (27 January 2011), at www.theregister.co.uk/2011/01/27/google_bittorrent_terms_killed_on_autocomplete/.Google Scholar
Galperin, E., and O’Brien, D.. ‘Russia blocks access to major independent news sites’ (13 March 2014), at www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/03/russia-blocks-access-major-independent-news-sites.Google Scholar
Ganesan, A. ‘Viewpoint: why voluntary initiatives aren’t enough’, Leading Perspectives (Spring 2009), at www.bsr.org/reports/leading-perspectives/2009/LP_Spring_2009_Voluntary_Initiatives.pdf.Google Scholar
Google. ‘A new approach to China’ (12 January 2010), at http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html.Google Scholar
Google. ‘A quick note about music blog removals’ (10 February 2010), at http://buzz.blogger.com/2010/02/quick-note-about-music-blog-removals.html.Google Scholar
Google. ‘Corporate social responsibility’, at www.google.com/intl/zh-CN/corporate/responsibility_en.html.Google Scholar
Google. ‘Controversial content and free expression on the web: a refresher’ (19 April 2010), at http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/controversial-contentand-free.html.Google Scholar
Google. ‘The Federal Trade Commission closes its antitrust review’ (3 January 2013), at http://googleblog.blogspot.ca/2013/01/the-federal-trade-commission-closes-its.html.Google Scholar
Google. ‘Finding more high-quality sites in search’ (24 February 2011), at http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/02/finding-more-high-quality-sites-in.html.Google Scholar
Google. ‘Let the music play’ (26 August 2009), at http://buzz.blogger.com/2009/08/let-music-play.html.Google Scholar
Google. ‘Search more securely with encrypted Google web search’ (21 May 2010), at http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/05/search-more-securely-with-encrypted.html.Google Scholar
Google. ‘Some weekend work that will (hopefully) enable more Egyptians to be heard’ (31 January 2011), at http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/01/some-weekend-work-that-will-hopefully.html.Google Scholar
Google. ‘Transparency report’, at www.google.com/transparencyreport/traffic/.Google Scholar
Google Blog. ‘Controversial content and free expression on the web: a refresher’, at http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/controversial-content-and-free.html.Google Scholar
Grossman, W. ‘IWF reforms could pave way for UK net censorship: who is watching the watchers?’ (29 December 2006), at www.theregister.co.uk/2006/12/29/iwf_feature/page3.html.Google Scholar
The Guardian. ‘Occupy protests around the world: full list visualised’, at www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2011/oct/17/occupy-protests-world-list-map.Google Scholar
Halfacree, G. ‘Government extends porn filter to “extremist” content’ (29 November 2013), at www.bit-tech.net/news/bits/2013/11/29/extremism-filter/1.Google Scholar
Halliday, J. ‘Google search results may indicate “right to be forgotten” censorship’ (8 June 2014), at www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/08/google-search-results-indicate-right-to-be-forgotten-censorship.Google Scholar
Halliday, J. ‘Google Street View: information commissioner shackled by Data Protection Act’ (28 October 2010), at www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/oct/28/google-street-view-information-commissioner.Google Scholar
Halliday, J. ‘Google Street View broke Canada’s privacy law with Wi-Fi capture’ (20 October 2010), at www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/oct/19/google-street-view-privacy-canada.Google Scholar
Hudson, A. ‘Turkey lifts its ban on YouTube-agency’ (30 October 2010), at http://uk.reuters.com/article/2010/10/30/oukin-uk-turkey-youtube-idUKTRE69T1JE20101030.Google Scholar
The Huffington Post. ‘Neda video wins Polk Award: Iran protest death video first anonymous winner of journalism prize’ (16 February 2010, at www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/16/neda-video-wins-polk-award_n_463378.html.Google Scholar
Information Commissioner’s Office. News release. ‘ICO fines former ACS Law boss for lax IT security’, at www.ico.gov.uk/~/media/documents/pressreleases/2011/monetary_penalty_acslaw_news_release_20110510.ashx.Google Scholar
ISPreview. ‘UK government seeking to expand website blocking remit through IWF’ (9 June 2011), at www.ispreview.co.uk/story/2011/06/09/uk-government-seeking-to-expand-website-blocking-remit-through-iwf.html.Google Scholar
Jaume-Palasi, L. ‘“Google Spain case”: court decision privatises the public sphere’ (27 May 2014), at http://policyreview.info/articles/news/google-spain-case-court-decision-privatises-public-sphere/291.Google Scholar
Jeffries, S. ‘A rare interview with Jürgen Habermas’, The Financial Times (30 April 2010), at www.ft.com/cms/s/0/eda3bcd8-5327-11df-813e-00144feab49a.html.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. ‘Amnesty criticises Global Network Initiative for online freedom of speech’ (30 October 2008), at www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/oct/30/amnesty-global-network-initiative.Google Scholar
Kain, E. ‘Reddit makes headlines boycotting GoDaddy over online censorship bills’ (26 December 2011), at www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2011/12/26/reddit-makes-headlines-boycotting-godaddy-over-online-censorship-bills/.Google Scholar
Kiss, J. ‘Facebook’s 10th birthday: from college dorm to 1.23 billion users’ (4 February 2014), at www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/04/facebook-10-years-mark-zuckerberg.Google Scholar
Kopytoff, V. G. ‘Sites like Twitter absent from free speech pact’ (6 March 2011), at www.nytimes.com/2011/03/07/technology/07rights.html.Google Scholar
Kravets, D. ‘What’s fueling Midest protests? It’s more than Twitter’ (28 January 2011), at www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-01/28/middle-east-protests-twitter?page=all.Google Scholar
Letsch, C., and Rushe, D.. ‘Turkey blocks YouTube amid “national security” concerns’ (28 March 2014), at www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/27/google-youtube-ban-turkey-erdogan.Google Scholar
MacAskill, E. ‘Wikileaks website pulled by Amazon after US political pressure’, at www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/01/wikileaks-website-cables-servers-amazon.Google Scholar
Melik, J. ‘Diamonds: does the Kimberley Process work?’ (28 June 2010), at www.bbc.co.uk/news/10307046.Google Scholar
Metz, C. ‘Google’s “Musicblogocide” blame the DMCA’ (11 February 2010), at www.theregister.co.uk/2010/02/11/google_musicblogocide_2010/.Google Scholar
Metz, C. ‘IWF confirms Wayback Machine porn blacklisting’ (14 January 2009), at www.theregister.co.uk/2009/01/14/iwf_details_archive_blacklisting/.Google Scholar
Michaels, S. ‘Google shuts down music blogs without warning’ (11 February 2010), at www.guardian.co.uk/music/2010/feb/11/google-deletes-music-blogs.Google Scholar
Morton, G. ‘Muslim leader drops Ezra Levant cartoon complaint’ (12 February 2008), at www.nationalpost.com/news/canada/story.html?id=303895.Google Scholar
Mulholland, H. ‘Government targets extremist websites’ (17 January 2008), at www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/jan/17/uksecurity.terrorism.Google Scholar
Nakashima, E. ‘Sexual threats stifle some female bloggers’ (30 April 2007), at www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/29/AR2007042901555.html.Google Scholar
Noman, H. ‘Saudi Arabia to impose restrictions on online content production, including on YouTube’ (3 December 2013), at https://opennet.net/blog/2013/12/saudi-arabia-impose-restrictions-online-content-production-including-youtube.Google Scholar
Nyaira, S. ‘Kimberley Process in turmoil after chairman clears Zimbabwe diamond sales’ (23 March 2011), at www.voanews.com/zimbabwe/news/Kimberley-Process-In-Turmoil-After-Chairman-Allows-Zimbabwes-Marange-Gems-Trade-118509874.html.Google Scholar
Oates, J. ‘ICO reopens Google Street View privacy probe’ (25 October 2010), at www.theregister.co.uk/2010/10/25/ico_google_probe/.Google Scholar
Ofcom. ‘Identifying appropriate regulatory solutions: principles for analysing self- and co-regulation’ (10 December 2008), at http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/coregulation/statement/statement.pdf.Google Scholar
Office of National Statistics. ‘Internet access – households and individuals, 2013’, at www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/rdit2/internet-access–-households-and-individuals/2013/stb-ia-2013.html.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics. ‘Internet access 2010’, at http://www.statistics.gov.uk/pdfdir/iahi0810.pdf.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, T. ‘What is Web 2.0’ (30 September 2005), at http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html.Google Scholar
Out-Law. ‘Super-injunction Twitter user in contempt of court if tweets were true’ (10 May 2011), at www.theregister.co.uk/2011/05/10/super_injunctions_tweeter_in_trouble_if_its_true/.Google Scholar
Out-Law.com. ‘Why the IWF was wrong to lift its ban on a Wikipedia page’ (11 December 2008), at www.out-law.com/page-9653.Google Scholar
Out-Law.com. ‘Information Commissioner gets power to fine for privacy breaches’ (12 May 2008), at www.out-law.com/page-9110.Google Scholar
Palfrey, J. ‘Testimony on internet filtering and surveillance’ at http://jpalfrey.andover.edu/2008/05/20/testimony-on-internet-filtering-and-surveillance/.Google Scholar
Pauli, D. ‘Australia’s Web blacklist leaked’ Computer World (19 March 2009), at www.computerworld.com.au/article/296161/australia_web_blacklist_leaked/.Google Scholar
Petley, J.Web Control’, Index on Censorship, 38(1) (2009) 78.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. ‘Internet use over time’ (September 2013), at www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/internet-use/internet-use-over-time/.Google Scholar
Press Association. ‘Two face jail over Twitter abuse of banknote campaigner’ (24 January 2014), at www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jan/24/two-face-jail-twitter-abuse.Google Scholar
Privacy International. ‘Civil liberties groups say UK information commissioner’s office is not “fit for purpose”’ (3 November 2010), at www.privacyinternational.org/article/civil-liberties-groups-say-uk-information-commissioner%E2%80%99s-office-not-fit-purpose.Google Scholar
Rainey, J. ‘Barack Obama can thank “citizen journalist” for “bitter” tempest’ (15 April 2008), at http://articles.latimes.com/print/2008/apr/15/nation/na-bitter15.Google Scholar
Reporters Without Borders. ‘Why reporters without borders is not endorsing the global principles on freedom of expression and privacy for ICT companies operating in internet-restricting countries’ (28 October 2008), at http://en.rsf.org/why-reporters-without-borders-is-28-10-2008,29117.html.Google Scholar
Reuters. ‘PCC clears Murdoch paper over hacking claim’ (9 November 2009), at www.independent.co.uk/news/media/press/pcc-clears-murdoch-paper-over-hacking-claim-1817573.html.Google Scholar
Rhoads, C., and Fowler, G. A.. ‘Egypt shuts down internet, cellphone services’, The Wall Street Journal (29 January 2011), at http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703956604576110453371369740.html?mod=googlenews_wsj.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. ‘PCC to re-examine News of the World phone-hacking evidence’, at www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/sep/21/phone-hacking-news-of-the-world.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. ‘The past as prologue? a moment of truth for UN business and human rights treaty’ at www.ihrb.org/commentary/past-as-prologue.html#_edn2.Google Scholar
Salkowitz, R. ‘Politicans seek “new” new media for 2012 run’ (21 April 2011), at www.internetevolution.com/author.asp?section_id=697&doc_id=205850&f_src=internetevolution_gnews%3Cbr%20/%3E.Google Scholar
Science Daily. ‘Google flu trends estimates off, study finds’, at www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/05/100517101714.htm (last visited 27 July 2011).Google Scholar
Sky News. ‘Paedophiles target virtual world’ (31 October 2007), at http://news.sky.com/home/article/1290719.Google Scholar
Starr, S.Internet Freedom’, New Humanist, 117(1) (2002).Google Scholar
Statistic Brain. ‘Google annual search statistics’, at www.statisticbrain.com/google-searches/.Google Scholar
Stephens, M. ‘Only the powerful will benefit from the ‘right to be forgotten’’ (18 May 2014), at www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/18/powerful-benefit-right-to-be-forgotten.Google Scholar
Strom, S., and Helft, M.. ‘Google finds it hard to reinvent philanthropy’, at www.nytimes.com/2011/01/30/business/30charity.html?_r=1.Google Scholar
Telegraph. ‘Hitler downfall parodies: 25 worth watching’ (6 October 2009), at www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/6262709/Hitler-Downfall-parodies-25-worth-watching.html.Google Scholar
Tripathi, S. ‘How businesses have responded in Egypt’ (7 February 2011), at www.ihrb.org/commentary/staff/how_businesses_have_responded_in_egypt.html.Google Scholar
Tripathi, S. ‘How should internet and phone companies respond in Egypt?’ (4 February 2011), at www.ihrb.org/commentary/staff/internet_providers_in_egypt.html.Google Scholar
UN News Centre. ‘UN Human Rights Council endorses principles to ensure businesses respect human rights’ (16 June 2011), at www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=38742&Cr=human±rights&Cr1=.Google Scholar
Villelabeitia, I. ‘Turkey reinstates YouTube ban’ (3 November 2010), at www.reuters.com/article/2010/11/03/us-turkey-youtube-idUSTRE6A227C20101103.Google Scholar
Wearden, G. ‘Bank of England turns to Google to shed light on economic trends’ (13 June 2011), at www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/jun/13/bank-of-england-google-searches?intcmp=239.Google Scholar
WorldWideWebSize. ‘The size of the World Wide Web’, at www.worldwidewebsize.com/.Google Scholar
The British Board of Film Classification, at www.bbfc.co.uk.Google Scholar
Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, at www.business-humanrights.org/Home.Google Scholar
Canadian Centre for Child Protection Inc. at www.cybertip.ca/app/en/.Google Scholar
Center for Justice and Accountability, at http://cja.org/article.php?id=435.Google Scholar
The Danish Institute for Human Rights, at www.humanrights.dk/.Google Scholar
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, at www.bis.gov.uk/.Google Scholar
Electronic Frontier Foundation, at www.eff.org.Google Scholar
Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition, at www.eicc.info/.Google Scholar
European Digital Rights (EDRI), at www.edri.org/.Google Scholar
Freedom of Information (Archive), at www.foi.gov.uk.Google Scholar
Global Business Initiative on Human Rights, at www.global-business-initiative.org.Google Scholar
Global Movement for a Binding Treaty at www.treatymovement.com.Google Scholar
Google.org Initiative, at www.google.org.Google Scholar
Institute for Human Rights and Business, at www.ihrb.org.Google Scholar
Information Commissioner’s Office, at www.ico.gov.uk/.Google Scholar
The Intellectual Property Office, at www.ipo.gov.uk.Google Scholar
International Answer, at www.answercoalition.org.Google Scholar
International Standards Organization, at www.iso.org/iso/home.htm.Google Scholar
Internet Rights and Principles Coalition, at http://internetrightsandprinciples.org/.Google Scholar
The Internet Service Providers’ Association, at www.ispa.org.uk/.Google Scholar
Internet Watch Foundation, at www.iwf.org.uk.Google Scholar
Office of Communication (Ofcom), at www.ofcom.org.uk/about/.Google Scholar
The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, at www.ohchr.org/.Google Scholar
Office of the Information Commissioner of Canada, at www.oic-ci.gc.ca/eng/.Google Scholar
The Press Complaints Commission, at www.pcc.org.uk/.Google Scholar
Social Accountability International, at http://www.sa-intl.org/.Google Scholar
United for Peace and Justice, at www.unitedforpeace.org.Google Scholar
United Nations Global Compact, at www.unglobalcompact.org.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Emily B. Laidlaw, University of Calgary
  • Book: Regulating Speech in Cyberspace
  • Online publication: 05 August 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107278721.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Emily B. Laidlaw, University of Calgary
  • Book: Regulating Speech in Cyberspace
  • Online publication: 05 August 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107278721.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Emily B. Laidlaw, University of Calgary
  • Book: Regulating Speech in Cyberspace
  • Online publication: 05 August 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107278721.009
Available formats
×