Skip to main content
×
×
Home
Regulating Speech in Cyberspace
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Groshek, Jacob 2017. Handbook of Research on Citizen Engagement and Public Participation in the Era of New Media. p. 107.

    Laidlaw, Emily B. 2017. The Responsibilities of Online Service Providers. Vol. 31, Issue. , p. 135.

    Mac Síthigh, Daithí 2016. Book Review: Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism is Turning the Internet Against DemocracyMcChesneyRobert, Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism is Turning the Internet Against Democracy. New York, NY: New Press, 2014, pp. 299, ISBN 978-1-62097-031-7, $18.97 (pbk).. Social & Legal Studies, Vol. 25, Issue. 5, p. 636.


    ×
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    Regulating Speech in Cyberspace
    • Online ISBN: 9781107278721
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107278721
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

Private companies exert considerable control over the flow of information on the internet. Whether users are finding information with a search engine, communicating on a social networking site or accessing the internet through an ISP, access to participation can be blocked, channelled, edited or personalised. Such gatekeepers are powerful forces in facilitating or hindering freedom of expression online. This is problematic for a human rights system which has historically treated human rights as a government responsibility, and this is compounded by the largely light-touch regulatory approach to the internet in the West. Regulating Speech in Cyberspace explores how these gatekeepers operate at the intersection of three fields of study: regulation (more broadly, law), corporate social responsibility and human rights. It proposes an alternative corporate governance model for speech regulation, one that acts as a template for the increasingly common use of non-state-based models of governance for human rights.

Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×
AccountAbility 1000S (AA1000S), at www.accountability.org/
Advertising Standards Authority, at www.asa.org.uk
Council of Europe, Recommendation CM/Rec(2012)3 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the protection of human rights with regard to search engines
Electronic Industry Code of Conduct, at www.eicc.info/eicc_code.shtml
Equality and Human Rights Commission, A Guide to Business and Human Rights (March 2013), at www.equalityhumanrights.com/private-and-public-sector-guidance/organisations-and-businesses/businesses/human-rights-matter
European Commission, ICT Sector Guide on Implementing the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (drafted by Shift and the Institute for Human Rights and Business)
European Commission, My Business and Human Rights: a guide to human rights for small and medium-sized enterprises, at http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/files/csr-sme/human-rights-sme-guide-final_en.pdf
Facebook’s ‘Community Standards’, at www.facebook.com/communitystandards
The Forest Stewardship Council, at www.fsc.org/
Freiwillige Selbstokontrolle Multimedia-Diensteanbieter (Association for the Voluntary Self-Monitoring of Multimedia Service Providers), ‘Subcode of Conduct for Search Engine Providers’
The Global e-Sustainability Initiative, at http://gesi.org
The Global Network Initiative, at www.globalnetworkinitiative.org/
The Global Network Initiative, Independent Assessment (2014), at http://globalnetworkinitiative.org/sites/default/files/GNI%20Assessments%20Public%20Report.pdf
The Global Reporting Initiative, at www.globalreporting.org/Home
Google, Blogger Terms of Service, at www.blogger.com/terms.g
Google, ‘Google terms of service’, at www.google.co.uk/intl/en-GB/policies/terms/regional.html
Google, ‘Removal policies’, at www.google.co.uk/intl/en-GB/policies/faq/
ICANN, Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy, at www.icann.org/en/udrp/udrp.htm
The International Labour Organisation, at www.ilo.org/global/lang–en/index.htm
International Standards ISO/DIS 26000, Social Responsibility, at www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:26000:ed-1:v1:en
ISPA, Best Current Practice on Blocking and filtering of Internet Traffic, at www.ispa.org.uk/home/page_327.html
Lord Macdonald of River Glaven, QC, ‘A human rights audit of the Internet Watch Foundation’, available at www.iwf.org.uk/accountability/human-rights-audit
Memorandum of Understanding between the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) concerning Section 46 Sexual Offences Act 2003
Nominet’s Dispute Resolution Service, at www.nominet.org.uk/disputes/drs/
OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, at www.oecd.org/document/28/0,3343,en_2649_34889_2397532_1_1_1_1,00.html
Ofcom, Customer Codes of Practice for handling complaints and resolving disputes (May 2005)
Ofcom, ‘Online Infringement of Copyright and the Digital Economy Act 2010: Draft Initial Obligations Code’, at http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/copyright-infringement/summary/condoc.pdf
Principles for Responsible Investment, at www.unpri.org
The Telecommunications Industry Dialogue on Freedom of Expression and Privacy, Guiding Principles, version 1 (March 6 2013), at www.telecomindustrydialogue.org/sites/default/files/Telecoms_Industry_Dialogue_Principles_Version_1_-_ENGLISH.pdf
United Nations Global Compact, ‘The Ten Principles’, at www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/TheTenPrinciples/index.html
World Intellectual Property Organization, Arbitration and Mediation Center, at www.wipo.int/amc/en/index.html
Emails between Emily Laidlaw and Nielsen, Lene, Communications Executive and Webmaster Internet Watch Foundation (March–April 2010), on file with the author.
Google’s Notion of Motion and Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, and Memorandum of Points, 2006 WL 1232481 for Kinderstart.com LLC et al. v. Google Inc., Case 5:06-cv-02057-JF (2007) (DC N.Cali).
The U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Human Rights and the law, ‘Global Internet Freedom and the Rule of Law, Part II’ (2010).
The U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Human Rights and the law, ‘Global Internet Freedom: Corporate Responsibility and the Law’ (2008).
The Leveson Inquiry, An Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press (November 2012).
Leveson Inquiry, evidence of Keller, Daphne, at www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Q2L9fWnb8I
Akdeniz, Y.Internet Child Pornography and the Law (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008).
Auletta, K.Googled: The End of the World as We Know It (London: Virgin Books, 2010).
Ayres, I., and Braithwaite, J.. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate (Oxford University Press, 1992).
Baldwin, R., and Cave, M.. Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).
Balkan, J.The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power (London: Constable and Robinson Ltd., 2005).
Barendt, E.Freedom of Speech, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2005).
Benedek, W., and Kettemann, M. C.. Freedom of Expression and the Internet (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2013).
Benkler, Y.The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom (Yale University Press, 2006).
Bernal, P.Internet Privacy Rights: Rights to Protect Autonomy (Cambridge University Press, 2014).
Blowfield, M., and Murray, A.. Corporate Responsibility: A Critical Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2008).
Braithwaite, J., and Drahos, P.. Global Business Regulation (Cambridge University Press, 2000).
Brand, S.The Media Lab: Inventing the Future at MIT (New York: Penguin Group, 1987).
Castells, M.The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society (Oxford University Press, 2001).
Castells, M.The Rise of the Network Society, 2nd edn (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000).
Citron, D. K.Hate Crimes in Cyberspace (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2014).
Clapham, A.Human Rights in the Private Sphere (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).
Clayton, R., and Tomlinson, H.. The Law of Human Rights, 2nd edn, vol. 1 (Oxford University Press, 2009).
Coffee, J. C.Gatekeepers: The Role of the Professions in Corporate Governance (Oxford University Press, 2006).
Dahl, R. A.Democracy and Its Critics (Yale University Press, 1989).
Donnelly, J.Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice, 2nd edn (Cornell University Press, 2002).
de Sola Pool, I.Technologies of Freedom (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 1983).
Emerson, T. I.The System of Freedom of Expression (New York: Random House, 1970).
Feintuck, M., and Varney, M.. Media Regulation, Public Interest and the Law (Edinburgh University Press, 2006).
Fenwick, H., and Phillipson, Gavin. Media Freedom under the Human Rights Act (Oxford University Press, 2006).
Fiske, J.Television Culture (London: Routledge, 1987).
Friedman, M.Capitalism and Freedom (University of Chicago Press, 1962).
Gearty, C.Principles of Human Rights Adjudication (Oxford University Press, 2004).
Habermas, J.Between Facts and Norms (MIT, 1996).
Habermas, J., Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993).
Habermas, J.Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (Translated Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990).
Habermas, J.The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere (Translated Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989).
Harris, D. J. et al. Law of European Convention on Human Rights, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2009).
Heald, M.The Social Responsibilities of Business: Company and Community, 1900–1960 (Cleveland, OH: Press of Case Western Reserve University, 1970).
Jørgensen, R. F.Framing the Net: The Internet and Human Rights (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2013).
Keen, A.The Cult of the Amateur (London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing, 2007).
Lessig, L.Code: Version 2.0 (New York: Basic Books, 2006).
Lessig, L.Code and other Laws of Cyberspace (New York: Basic Books, 1999).
Lord Lester of Herne Hill et al. Human Rights Law and Practice (London: Butterworths, 1999).
Lozano, J. M. et al. Governments and Corporate Social Responsibility: Public Policies beyond Regulation and Voluntary Compliance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).
Mackay, H. et al, Investigating the Information Society (London: Routledge, 2001).
MacKinnon, R.Consent of the Networked: The Worldwide Struggle for Internet Freedom (New York: Basic Books, 2012).
Marsden, C.Internet Co-Regulation: European Law, Regulatory Governance and Legitimacy in Cyberspace (Cambridge University Press, 2011).
Mayer-Shönberger, V.Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age (Princeton University Press, 2009).
Morgan, B., and Yeung, K.. An Introduction to Law and Regulation: Text and Materials (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
Morozov, E.The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom (New York: Public Affairs, 2011).
Morsink, J.The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Origins, Drafting & Intent (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999).
Murray, A.Information Technology Law: The Law and Society (Oxford University Press, 2010).
Negroponte, N.Being Digital (New York: Vintage Books, 1995).
Norris, P.Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide (Cambridge University Press, 2001).
Prosser, T.The Regulatory Enterprise: Government, Regulation, and Legitimacy (Oxford University Press, 2010).
Richter, J.Holding Corporations Accountable: Corporate Conduct, International Codes, and Citizen Action (London: Zed Books Ltd, 2001).
Ruggie, J.Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2013).
Shoemaker, P.Gatekeeping (Communication Concepts) (Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991).
Shoemaker, P.Gatekeeping Theory (New York: Routledge, 2009).
Smith, R. K. M.International Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2007).
Sunstein, C. R.Infotopia (Oxford University Press, 2006).
Sunstein, C. R.Republic.com (Princeton University Press, 2001).
Sunstein, C. R.Republic.com 2.0 (Princeton University Press, 2007).
Tambini, D. et al. Codifying Cyberspace (London: Routledge, 2008).
van Hoboken, J.Search Engine Freedom: On the Implications of the Right to Freedom of Expression for the Legal Governance of Web Search Services (Amsterdam: Kluwer Law International, 2012).
Wales, A.Big Business, Big Responsibilities (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).
Walters, G. J.Human Rights in an Information Age: A Philosophical Analysis (University of Toronto Press, 2001).
Weaver, R. L.From Gutenberg to the Internet: Free Speech, Advancing Technology, and the Implications for Democracy (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2013).
Weber, R. H.Shaping Internet Governance: Regulatory Challenges (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2010).
Webster, F.Theories of the Information Society, 2nd edn (London, Routledge, 2002).
Zittrain, J.The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It (Yale University Press, 2008).
Klang, M.Disruptive Technology (Doctoral Dissertation, unpublished, 2006).
Allison, J. E. (ed.). Technology, Development, and Democracy: International Conflict and Cooperation in the Information Age (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002).
Boeger, N. et al. (eds.). Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility (Cheltenham, Eward Elgar, 2008).
Brownsword, R., and Yeung, K. (eds.). Regulating Technologies: Legal Future, Regulatory Frames and Technological Fixes (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008).
Calhoun, C. (ed.). Habermas and the Public Sphere (MIT Press, 1992).
Crane, A. et al. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2008).
Dahl, R. A. et al. (eds.). The Democracy Sourcebook (MIT Press, 2003).
Deibert, R. et al. (eds.). Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace (MIT Press, 2010).
Deibert, R. et al. (eds.). Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering (MIT Press, 2008).
De Sousa Santos, B., and Rodriguez-Garavito, C. A. (eds.). Law and Globalization from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
Deva, S., and Bilchitz, D. (eds.). Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
Dommering, E., and Asscher, L. (eds.). Coding Regulation (Cambridge University Press, 2006).
Dyzenhaus, D. (ed.). Recrafting the Rule of Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999).
Edwards, L., and Waelde, C. (eds.). Law and the Internet, 3rd edn (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009).
Erdelez, S. et al. (eds.). Theories of Information Behavior: A Researcher’s Guide (Medford, New Jersey: Information Today, 2005).
Feenberg, A., and Barney, D. (eds.). Community in the Digital Age: Philosophy and Practice (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2004).
Jørgensen, R. F. (ed.). Human Rights in the Global Information Society (MIT Press, 2006).
Klang, M., and Murray, A. (eds.). Human Rights in the Digital Age (London: Cavendish Publishing, 2005).
Levmore, S., and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.). The Offensive Internet (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2010).
MacKenzie, D., and Wajcman, J. (eds.). The Social Shaping of Technology, 2nd edn (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1999).
McBarnet, D. et al. (eds.). The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
Morgan, B. (ed.). The Intersection of Rights and Regulation: New Directions in Sociolegal Scholarship (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007).
Nissebaum, H., and Price, M. E. (eds.). Academy & Internet (New York: Peter Lang Publishing, 2004).
Ramcharan, B. G. (ed.). The Protection Role of National Human Rights Institutions (Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005).
Sarikakis, K., and Thussu, D. K. (eds.). Ideologies of the Internet (Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press, 2006).
Shane, P. M. (ed.). Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal through the Internet (New York: Routledge, 2004).
Sullivan, R. (ed.). Business and Human Rights: Dilemmas and Solutions (Greenleaf, 2003).
Walker, C., and Weaver, R. L. (ed.). Free Speech in an Internet Era (Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 2013).
Webb, K. (ed.). Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest and Innovation (Carleton Research Unit for Innovation, Science and Environment, 2004).
Webster, F. (ed.). The Information Society Reader (London: Routledge, 2004).
Agre, P. E.The Practical Republic: Social Skills and the Progress of Citizenship’, in Feenberg, A. and Barney, D. (eds.), Community in the Digital Age: Philosophy and Practice (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2004).
Banisar, D.The Right to Information in the Age of Information’, in JØrgensen, R. F. (ed.), Human Rights in the Global Information Socie’ty (MIT Press, 2006).
Barzilai Nahon, K.Network Gatekeeping Theory’, in Erdelez, S. et al. (eds.), Theories of Information Behavior: A Researcher’s Guide (Medford, New Jersey: Information Today, 2005).
Bilchitz, D.A Chasm between “Is” and “Ought”? A Critique of the Normative Foundations of the SRSG’s Framework and the Guiding Principles’, in Deva, S. and Bilchitz, D. (eds.), Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
Bohman, J.Expanding Dialogue: The Internet, Public Sphere, and Transnational Democracy’, in Shane, P. M. (ed.), Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal through the Internet (New York: Routledge, 2004).
Campbell, T.The Normative Grounding of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Human Rights Approach’, in McBarnet, D. et al. (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
Carroll, A. B.A History of Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts and Practices’, in Crane, A. et al. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (Oxford University Press, 2008).
Deibert, R. J., and Villeneuve, N.. ‘Firewalls and Power: An Overview of Global State Censorship of the Internet’, in Klang, M. and Murray, A. (eds.), Human Rights in the Digital Age (London: Cavendish Publishing, 2005).
Esler, B. W.Filtering, Blocking and Rating: Chaperones and Censorship’, in Klang, M. and Murray, A. (eds.), Human Rights in the Digital Age (London: Cavendish Publishing, 2005).
Faris, R., and Villeneuve, N.. ‘Measuring Global Internet Filtering’, in Deibert, R. et al. (eds.), Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering (MIT Press, 2008).
Freeman, J.Private Parties, Public Functions and the New Administrative Law’, in Dyzenhaus, D. (ed.), Recrafting the Rule of Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999).
Froomkin, A. M.Technologies for Democracy’, in Shane, P. M. (ed.), Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal through the Internet (New York: Routledge, 2004).
Glinski, C.Corporate Codes of Conduct: Moral or Legal Obligation’, in McBarnet, D. et al. (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
Johnson, D., and Bimber, B.. ‘The Internet and Political Transformation Revisited’, in Feenberg, A. and Barney, D. (eds.), Community in the Digital Age: Philosophy and Practice (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2004).
Kahn, R., and Kellner, D.. ‘Virtually Democratic: Online Communities and Internet Activism’, in Feenberg, A. and Barney, D. (eds.), Community in the Digital Age: Philosophy and Practice (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2004).
Kedzie, C. R., and Aaragon, J.. ‘Coincident Revolutions and the Dictator’s Dilemma: Thoughts on Communication and Democratization’, in Allison, J. E. (ed.), Technology, Development, and Democracy: International Conflict and Cooperation in the Information Age (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002).
Kinley, D. et al. ‘“The Norms Are Dead! Long Life the Norms!” The Politics behind the UN Human Rights Norms for Corporations’, in McBarnet, D. et al. (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
Lambers, R.Code and Speech. Speech Control through Network Architecture’, in Dommering, E. and Asscher, L. (eds.), Coding Regulation (Cambridge University Press, 2006).
Leiter, B.Cleaning Cyber-Cesspools: Google and Free Speech’, in Levmore, S. and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.), The Offensive Internet (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2010).
Lopez, C.The “Ruggie Process”: From Legal Obligations to Corporate Social Responsibility?’, in Deva, S. and Bilchitz, D. (eds.), Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
McBarnet, D.Corporate Social Responsibility beyond Law, through Law, for Law: The New Corporate Accountability’, in McBarnet, D. et al. (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
Maclay, C, ‘Protecting Privacy and Expression Online: Can the Global Network Initiative embrace the character of the Net?’, in Deibert, R. et al. (eds.), Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace (MIT Press, 2010).
McIntyre, T., and Scott, C.. ‘Internet Filtering: Rhetoric, Legitimacy, Accountability and Responsibility’, in Brownsword, R. and Yeung, K. (eds.), Regulating Technologies: Legal Future, Regulatory Frames and Technological Fixes (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008).
Morrison, A., and Webb, K.. ‘Bicycle Helmets and Hockey Helmet Regulations: Two Approaches to Safety Protection’, in Webb, K. (ed.), Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest and Innovation (Carleton Research Unit for Innovation, Science and Environment, 2004).
Muchlinski, P.The Development of Human Rights Responsibilities for Multinational Enterprises’, in Sullivan, R. (ed.), Business and Human Rights: Dilemmas and Solutions (Greenleaf, 2003).
Murdoch, S. J., and Anderson, R.. ‘Tools and Technology of Internet Filtering’, in Deibert, R. et al. (eds.), Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering (MIT Press, 2008).
Nolan, J.The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: Soft Law or Not Law?’, in Deva, S. and Bilchitz, D. (eds.), Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
Noveck, B. S.Unchat: Democratic Solution for a Wired World’, in Shane, P. M. (ed.), Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal through the Internet (New York: Routledge, 2004).
Parker, C.Meta-Regulation: Legal Accountability for Corporate Social Responsibility’, in McBarnet, D. et al. (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
Pinter, A., and Oblak, T.. ‘Is There a Public Sphere in This Discussion Forum?’, in Sarikakis, K. and Thussu, D. K. (eds.), Ideologies of the Internet (Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press, 2006).
Riefa, C., and Hornle, J.. ‘The Changing Face of Electronic Consumer Contracts in the Twenty-First Century: Fit for Purpose?’, in Edwards, L. and Waelde, C. (eds.), Law and the Internet, 3rd edn (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009).
Rosenzweig, R.How Will the Net’s History Be Written? Historians and the Internet’, in Nissebaum, H. and Price, M. E. (eds.), Academy & Internet (New York: Peter Lang Publishing, 2004).
Rowland, D.Free Expression and Defamation’, in Klang, M. and Murray, A. (eds.), Human Rights in the Digital Age (London: Cavendish Publishing, 2005).
Raseroka, K.Access to Information and Knowledge’, in Jørgensen, R. F. (ed.), Human Rights in the Global Information Society (MIT Press, 2006).
Rundle, M., and Birdling, M.. ‘Filtering and the International System: A Question of Commitment’, in Deibert, R. et al. (eds.), Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering (MIT Press, 2008).
Scott, C.Reflexive Governance, Meta-Regulation, and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Heineken Effect’, in Boeger, N. et al. (eds.), Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility (Cheltenham, Eward Elgar, 2008).
Shamir, R.Corporate Social Responsibility: A Case of Hegemony and Counter-Hegemony’, in De Sousa Santos, B. and Rodriguez-Garavito, C. A. (eds.), Law and Globalization from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
Vegh, S.Profit over Principles: The Commercialization of the Democratic Potentials of the Internet’, in Sarikakis, K. and Thussu, D. K. (eds.), Ideologies of the Internet (Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press, 2006).
Vick, D.Regulating Hatred’, in Klang, M. and Murray, A. (eds.), Human Rights in the Digital Age (London: Cavendish Publishing, 2005).
Voilescu, A.Changing Paradigms of Corporate Criminal Responsibility: Lessons for Corporate Social Responsibility’, in McBarnet, D. et al. (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
Webb, K.Understanding the Voluntary Codes Phenomenon’, in Webb, K. (ed.), Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest and Innovation (Carleton Research Unit for Innovation, Science and Environment, 2004).
Webb, K., and Morrison, A.. ‘The Law and Voluntary Codes: Examining the “Tangled Web”’, in Webb, K. (ed.), Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest and Innovation (Carleton Research Unit for Innovation, Science and Environment, 2004).
Weber, L. M., and Murray, S.. ‘Interactivity: Equality, and the Prospects for Electronic Democracy: A Review’, in Sarikakis, K. and Thussu, D. K. (eds.), Ideologies of the Internet (Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press, 2006).
Winner, L.Do Artifacts Have Politics?’, in the MacKenzie, D. and Wajcman, J. (eds.), The Social Shaping of Technology, 2nd edn (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1999).
Akdeniz, Y.To Block or Not to Block: European Approaches to Content Regulation, and Implications for Freedom of Expression’, CLSR, 26 (2010) 260.
Ammori, M. ‘First Amendment Architecture’, Wis. L. Rev. (2012) 1.
Balkin, J. M.The Future of Free Expression in the Digital Age’, Pepp. L. Rev. 36 (2008) 101.
Balkin, J. M.Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society’, NYULR, 79(1) (2004) 1.
Barber, B. R.Three Scenarios for the Future of Technology and Strong Democracy’, PSQ, 113(4) (1998–99) 573.
Barber, B. R.Which Technology for Which Democracy? Why Democracy for Which Technology?’, IJCLP, 6 (2001) 1.
Barzilai-Nahon, K.Gatekeeping Revisited: A Critical Review’, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 43 (2009) 1.
Barzilai-Nahon, K.Toward a Theory of Network Gatekeeping: A Framework for Exploring Information Control’, JASIST, 59(9) (2008) 1493.
Barzilai-Nahon, K.Gatekeepers, Virtual Communities and the Gated: Multidimensional Tensions in Cyberspace’, Int’l J. Comm. L. & Pol’y, 11(9) (2006) 1.
Ben-Ishai, S.Corporate Gatekeeper Liability in Canada’, Tex. Intl. L. J., 42 (2007) 443.
Benjamin, S. M.Algorithms and Speech’, U. PA. L. Rev. 161(6) (2013) 1445.
Benkler, Y.From Consumers to Users: The Deeper Structures of Regulation Toward Sustainable Commons and User Access’, Fed. Comm. L. J. 52 (2000) 561.
Benkler, Y. et al. ‘Social Mobilization and the Networked Public Sphere: Mapping the SOPA-PIPA Debate’ (July 2013), The Berkman Center for Internet & Society Research Publication Series No. 2013–16.
Bergman, M.The Deep Web: Surfacing Hidden Value’, J. Electron. Publ., 7(1) (2001) 1.
Black, J.Decentring Regulation: Understanding the Role of Regulation and Self-Regulation in a “Post-Regulatory” World’, CLP, 54 (2001) 103.
Bracha, O., and Pasquale, F.. ‘Federal Search Commission? Access, Fairness and Accountability in the Law of Search’, Cornell L. R. 93 (2008) 1149.
Chandler, J. A.A Right to Reach an Audience: An Approach to Intermediary Bias on the Internet’, Hofstra L. Rev. 35(3) (2007) 101.
Cortes, P., and De la Rosa, F. E.. ‘Building a Global Redress System for Low-Value Cross-Border Disputes’, Intl. & Comp. L. Q. 62(2) (2013) 407.
Dahlberg, L.Democracy via Cyberspace’, New Media & Society, 3(2) (2001) 157.
Dahlgren, P.The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation’, Political Communication, 22 (2005) 147.
Darian-Smith, E., and Scott, C.. ‘Regulation and Human Rights in Socio-Legal Scholarship’, Law and Policy, 31(3) (2009) 271.
De Hert, P., and Kloza, D.. ‘Internet (Access) as a New Fundamental Right. Inflating the Current Rights Framework?’, EJLT, 3(3) (2012).
Doane, D.The Myth of CSR: The Problem with Assuming That Companies Can Do Well While Also Doing Good Is That Markets Don’t Really Work That Way’, SSIR, 3(3) (2005) 23.
Edwards, L.From Child Porn to China, in One Cleanfeed’, Script-ed, 3(3) (2006) 174.
Elkin-Koren, N.Let the Crawlers Crawl: On Virtual Gatekeepers and the Right to Exclude Indexing’, U. Dayton L. Rev. 26 (2000) 179.
Froomkin, A. M.Habermas@Discourse.Net: Towards a Critical Theory of Cyberspace’, HLR, 116(3) (2003) 751.
Garnham, N.Information Society Theory as Ideology’ (1998) 21(1) Loisir et Societe97.
Gasser, U. ‘Responsibility for Human Rights Violations, Acts or Omissions, within the “Sphere of Influence” of Companies’, Working Paper Series (December 2007).
Goldman, E.Search Engine Bias and the Demise of Search Engine Utopianism’, YJLT, 8 (2005–6) 188.
Grimmelmann, J.The Google Dilemma’, N. Y. L. School L. Rev., 53 (2008/2009) 939.
Grimmelmann, J. ‘Speech Engines’, U. Md. Francis King Carey School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2014–11 (2014) 867.
Habermas, J.Human Rights and Popular Sovereignty: The Liberal and Republican Versions’, Ratio Juris, 7(1) (1994) 1.
Habermas, J.Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research’, Communication Theory, 16 (2006) 411.
Halcli, A., and Webster, F.. ‘Inequality and Mobilization in the Information Age’ (2000) 3(1) European Journal of Social Theory67.
Heverly, R.Breaking the Internet: International Efforts to Play the Middle against the Ends: A Way Forward’, Georgetown J. of Intl. L. 42(4) (2011) 1083.
Heverly, R. A. ‘Law as Intermediary’, Mich. St. L. Rev (2006) 107.
Hildebrandt, M., and Koops, B.. ‘The Challenges of Ambient Law and Legal Protection in the Profiling Era’, MLR, 73(3) (2010) 428.
Howard, P. N., and Hussain, M. M.. ‘The Upheavals in Egypt and Tunisia: The Role of Digital Media’, Journal of Democracy, 22(3) (2011) 35.
Johnson, D. R., and Post, D. G.. ‘Law and Borders – The Rise of Law in Cyberspace’ (1996), at www.temple.edu/lawschool/dpost/Borders.html.
Julia-Barcelo, , and Koelman, K. J., ‘Intermediary Liability in the E-Commerce Directive: So Far So Good, But It’s Not Enough’, CLSR, 16(4) (2004) 231.
Katyal, S. K.Semiotic Disobedience’, Wash. U. L. Rev. 84(2) (2006) 489.
Kohl, U.Google: The Rise and Rise of Online Intermediaries in the Governance of the Internet and Beyond (Part 2)’, IJILT, 21(2) (2013) 187.
Kohl, U.The Rise and Rise of Online Intermediaries in the Governance of the Internet and Beyond – Connectivity Intermediaries’, IRLCT 26(2) (2011) 185.
Kraakman, R. H.Corporate Liability Strategies and the Costs of Legal Controls’, Yale L. J. 93 (1983–1985) 857.
Kraakman, R. H.Gatekeepers: The Anatomy of a Third-Party Enforcement Strategy’, J. L. Econ. & Org. 2 (1986) 53.
Kreimer, S. F.Censorship By Proxy: First Amendment, Internet Intermediaries, and the Problem of the Weakest Link’, U. Pa. L. Rev. 155 (2006–2007) 11.
Laidlaw, E. B.A Framework for Identifying Internet Information Gatekeepers’, IRLCT, 43(3) (2010) 263.
Laidlaw, E. B.Private Power, Public Interest: An Examination of Search Engine Accountability’, IJLIT, 17 (1) (2009) 113.
Laidlaw, E.The Responsibilities of Free Speech Regulators: An Analysis of the Internet Watch Foundation’, IJILT, 20(4) (2012) 312.
Lewin, K.Frontiers in Group Dynamics’, Human Relations, 1(2) (1947) 143.
Lievens, E. et al. ‘The Co-Protection of Minors in New Media: A European Approach to Co-Regulation’, U. C. Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol’y, 10 (2006) 98.
Longford, G., and Patten, S.. ‘Democracy in the Age of the Internet’, UNBLJ, 56 (2007) 5.
Mac Síthigh, D.‘App Law Within: Rights and Regulation in the Smartphone Age’, IJILT, 21(2) (2013) 154.
Mac Síthigh, D.The Fragmentation of Intermediary Liability in the UK’, JIPLP, 8(7) (2013) 521.
Mac Síthigh, D.Virtual Walls? The Law of Pseudo-Public Spaces’, Int. J. L. C. 8(3) (2012) 394.
Mann, R. J., and Belzley, S. R.. ‘The Promise of Internet Intermediary Liability’, W. M. & Mary L. Rev. 47 (2005) 239.
Manokha, I.Business Ethics and the Spirit of Global Capitalism: Moral Leadership in the Context of Global Hegemony’, Journal of Global Ethics, 2(1) (2006) 27.
Manokha, I.Corporate Social Responsibility: A New Signifier? An Analysis of Business Ethics and Good Business Practice’, Politics, 24(1) (2004) 56.
McCorquodale, R.Corporate Social Responsibility and International Human Rights Law’, Journal of Business Ethics, 87 (2009) 385.
McCorquodale, R., and Fairbrother, R.. ‘Globalization and Human Rights’, Hum. Rts. Q. 21(3)) (1999) 735.
Metoyer-Duran, C.Information Gatekeepers’, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 28 (1993) 111.
Murray, A.Nodes and Gravity in Virtual Space’, Legisprudence, 5(2) (2011) 195.
Murray, A.Symbiotic Regulation’, J. Marshall J. of Computer & Info. L. 26(2) (2009) 207.
Murray, A., and Scott, C.. ‘Regulating New Media’, MLR, 65 (2002) 491.
Okoye, A.Theorising Corporate Social Responsibility as an Essentially Contested Concept: Is a Definition Necessary?’, J. Bus. Ethics, 89 (2009) 613.
Orgad, S.The Cultural Dimensions of Online Communication: A Study of Breast Cancer Patients’ Internet Spaces’, New Media & Society, 8(6) (2006) 87.
Palfrey, J. G.Four Phases of Internet Regulation’, Social Research, 77(3) (Fall 2010).
Papacharissi, Z.The Virtual Sphere: The Internet as a Public Sphere’, New Media & Society, 4(1) (2002) 9.
Pasquale, F.Asterisk Revisited: Debating a Right of Reply on Search Results’, J. Bus. & Tech. L. 3 (2008) 61.
Pasquale, F.Rankings, Reductionalism and Responsibility’, Clev. St. L. Rev. 54 (2006) 115.
Patterson, M. R. ‘Google and Search-Engine Market Power’, Harvard Journal Law and Technology Occasional Paper Series (2013) 1.
Picciotto, S.Rights, Responsibilities and Regulation of International Business’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 42 (2003) 131.
Pitts, C., and Sherman, J.. ‘Human Rights Corporate Accountability Guide: From Laws to Norms to Values’, Working Paper No. 51, Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative (December 2008).
Price, V. et al. ‘Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion?’, Political Communication, 19(1) (2002) 95.
Reidenberg, J. R.Lex Informatica: The Formulation of Information Policy Rules through Technology’, Tex. L. R. 76(3) (1998) 553.
Rowbottom, J.To Rant, Vent and Converse: Protecting Low Level Digital Speech’, CLJ, 71(2) (2012) 355.
Scherer, A. G., and Palazzo, G.. ‘Toward a Political Conception of Corporate Social Responsibility: Business and Society Seen from a Habermasian Perspective’, Academy of Management Review, 32(4) (2007) 1096.
Schulz, W. et al. ‘Search Engines as Gatekeepers of Public Communication: An Analysis of the German Framework Applicable to Internet Search Engines Including Media Law and Anti Trust Law’, German Law Journal, 6(1) (2005) 1419.
Scott, C.Accountability in The Regulatory State’, Journal of Law and Society, 27(1) (2000) 38.
Seyfert, C.25 Clauses of Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service Are Legally Void’, E. C. L. Rep. 14(1) (2014), 23.
Sheehy, B.Understanding CSR: An Empirical Study of Private Self-Regulation’, Monash Law Review, 38(2) (2011) 1.
Shoemaker, P. et al. ‘Individual and Routine Forces in Gatekeeping’, J&MC Quarterly, 78(2 (2001) 233.
Smith, P.The Politics of UK Television Policy: The Making of Ofcom’, Media Culture & Society, 28(6) (2006) 929.
Sutter, G.“Nothing New under the Sun”: Old Fear and New Media’, IJLIT, 8 (2000), 338.
Van Couvering, E.Is Relevance Relevant? Market, Science, and War: Discourses of Search Engine Quality’, J. Comput.-Mediat. Comm. 12(3) (2007) 866.
van Eijk, N.Search Engines: Seek and Ye Shall Find? The Position of Search Engines in Law’, Iris plus, 2 (2006) 1.
Votaw, D.Genius Became Rare: A Comment on the Doctrine of Social Responsibility Pt 1’, Calif. Manage. Rev. 15(2) (1972) 25.
Wu, T.Machine Speech’, U. PA. L. Rev. 161(6) (2013) 1495.
Zittrain, J.A History of Online Gatekeeping’, Harv. J. L. & Tech. 19(2) (2006) 253.
Zittrain, J.Internet Points of Control’, B. C. L. Rev. 44 (2002) 653.
Ahlert, C. et al. ‘How “liberty” disappeared from cyberspace: the mystery shopper tests internet content self-regulation’, at http://pcmlp.socleg.ox.ac.uk/sites/pcmlp.socleg.ox.ac.uk/files/liberty.pdf.
Bayer, J.Liability of internet service providers for third party content’, Victoria University Wellington Working Paper Series, 1 (2008) 1.
Best, M. L., and Wade, K. W.. ‘The internet and democracy: global catalyst or democratic dud’ (Research Publication No. 2005–12: Berkman Center, 2005).
Brown, I.Internet self-regulation and fundamental rights’, Index on Censorship, 1 (2010) 98.
Brown, I., and Korff, D.. ‘Digital freedoms in international law: practical steps to protect human rights online’ (June 2012) (report commissioned by the Global Network Initiative).
Business Leaders Initiative on Human Rights, United Nations Global Compact and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. ‘A guide for integrating human rights into business management I’.
Business Leaders Initiative on Human Rights, United Nations Global Compact and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. ‘A guide for integrating human rights into business management II’.
Canadian Centre for Child Protection. Child sexual abuse images: an analysis of websites by cybertip.ca (November 2009).
Communication. ‘Implementing the Partnership for Growth and Jobs: Making Europe a Pole of Excellence on Corporate Social Responsibility’, COM (2006) 136.
Council of Europe. ‘Building a Free and Safe Internet’, Submission to the Internet Governance Forum, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 12–15 November 2007.
Council of Europe and European Internet Service Providers Association. ‘Human rights guidelines for Internet service providers’, at www.coe.int/t/informationsociety/documents/HRguidelines_ISP_en.pdf.
Council of Europe and the Interactive Software Federation of Europe. ‘Human rights guidelines for online game providers’, at www.coe.int/t/informationsociety/documents/HRguidelines_OGP_en.pdf.
Council of Europe. Recommendation CM/Rec(2008)6 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on measures to promote the respect for freedom of expression and information with regard to internet filters (March 2008).
Clayton, R. ‘Failures in a hybrid content blocking system’, at www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rnc1/cleanfeed.pdf.
Clayton, R. ‘Technical aspects of censoring Wikipedia’, at www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2008/12/11/technical-aspects-of-the-censoring-of-wikipedia/.
The Department of Trade and Industry. DTI Consultation Document on the Electronic Commerce Directive: The Liability of Hyperlinkers, Location Tools Services and Content Aggregators (June 2005), at http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20090609003228/http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file13986.pdf.
Edelman, B., and Lockwood, B.. ‘Measuring bias in “organic” web search’, at www.benedelman.org/searchbias/.
Equality and Human Rights Commission. Strategic Plan 2012–2015, at www.equalityhumanrights.com/about-us/about-commission/our-vision-and-mission/strategic-plan-2012-2015.
Equality and Human Rights Commission. Submission to the 10th International Conference of NHRIs (Session 6 on 9 October 2010), The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights.
European Commission. Communication on Internet Policy and Governance Europe’s role in shaping the future of Internet Governance COM/2014/072.
European Commission. ‘A Coherent Framework for Building Trust in the Digital Single Market for E-Commerce and Online Services’, COM(2011) 942.
European Commission. ‘A Renewed EU strategy 2011–14 for Corporate Social Responsibility’, COM(2011) 681.
European Commission. ‘European Governance: A White Paper’,COM(2001) 428 (25 July 2001).
European Multi-Stakeholder Forum on CSR: Final Results and Recommendations (29 June 2004).
Frankental, P., and House, F.. ‘Human Rights – Is It Any of Your Business?’ (2000) Amnesty International.
Green Paper. ‘Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility’, COM (2001) 366.
HM Government. Corporate Responsibility Report (BERR, February 2009).
HM Government. Corporate Social Responsibility: A Government Update (DTI, May 2004).
HM Government. Good Business: Implementing the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (September 2013).
House of Commons, Justice Committee. The Functions, Powers and Resources of the Information Commissioner, Ninth Report of Session 2012–13 (12 March 2013), at www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmjust/962/962.pdf.
Human Rights Council. ‘Elaboration of an international legally binding instrument on Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises with respect to Human Rights’ (A/HRC/26/L.22), at http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/LTD/G14/064/48/PDF/G1406448.pdf?OpenElement.
Information Commissioner’s Office. Data Protection and the Press – Framework Consultation on Proposed ICO Code of Practice, at http://ico.org.uk/news/blog/2013/~/media/documents/library/Data_Protection/Research_and_reports/framework-consultation-summary-of-responses.pdf.
Information Commissioner’s Office. The Information Commissioner’s Response to the Leveson Report, at http://ico.org.uk/news/~/media/documents/consultation_responses/ico_response_to_leveson_report_012013.ashx (last visited 2 April 2014).
International Council on Human Rights Policy. Beyond Voluntarism: Human Rights and the Developing International Legal Obligations of Companies (February 2002), at www.ichrp.org/files/reports/7/107_report_en.pdf.
Internet Watch Foundation. Annual and Charity Report 2013, at www.iwf.org.uk/accountability/annual-reports/2013-annual-report.
Internet Watch Foundation. 2012 Annual and Charity Report, at www.iwf.org.uk/accountability/annual-reports/2011-annual-report (last visited 27 June 2014).
Internet Watch Foundation. 2008 Annual and Charity Report, at www.iwf.org.uk/accountability/annual-reports/2008-annual-report.
Internet Watch Foundation, Annual and Charity Report 2006.
Joint Committee on Human Rights. Any of Our Business? Human Rights and the UK Private Sector (First Reports of Session 2009–10), vol. I.
Joint Committee on Human Rights. Any of Our Business? Human Rights and the UK Private Sector (First Reports of Session 2009–10), vol. II.
Joint Committee on Human Rights. Equality and Human Rights Commission (Thirteenth Report of Session 2009–10).
Joint Committee on Human Rights. Tenth Report (2007), at www.parliament.the-stationery-office.com/pa/jt200607/jtselect/jtrights/81/8105.htm.
Laidlaw, E. ‘Unraveling Intermediary Liability’, presented at British and Irish Law, Education and Technology (University of East Anglia, April 2014), at www.laidlaw.eu/2014/06/unraveling-intermediary-liability/.
Laidlaw, E.What is a joke? The role of social media providers in regulating speech’, presented at The Legal Challenges of Social Media to Freedom of Expression (University of Leicester, December 2013), at www.laidlaw.eu/2014/06/what-is-a-joke-the-role-of-social-media-providers-in-regulating-speech/.
McIntyre, T. J. ‘Intermediaries, Invisibility and the Rule of Law’, BILETA Conference Paper (2008).
Monash University Castan Centre for Human Rights Law. Human Rights Translated: A Business Reference Guide.
Nahon, K. et al. ‘Information flows in events of political unrest’ at www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/39165/259.pdf?sequence=4.
Ntoulas, A. et al. ‘Downloading hidden content’, at http://oak.cs.ucla.edu/~cho/papers/ntoulas-hidden.pdf.
OECD Watch. 10 Years On: Assessing the Contribution of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises to Responsible Business Conduct.
Office of the Privacy Commissioner. ‘The case for reforming the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act’ (May 2013), at https://www.priv.gc.ca/parl/2013/pipeda_r_201305_e.pdf.
Office of the United Nations Commissioner for Human Rights. Business and Human Rights: A Progress Report (2000), at www2.ohchr.org/english/about/publications/docs/business.htm.
Palfrey, J. G. Jr.Reluctant Gatekeepers: Corporate Ethics on a Filtered Internet’, in Global Information Technology Report (World Economic Forum: 2006–2007).
Promoting a European Framework for corporate social responsibility, Green Paper (Employment & Social Affairs, 2001).
Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee. First Report on the Application of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (Directive on electronic commerce).
Report of the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of expression, Frank La Rue to the United Nations General Assembly, 16 May 2011, at www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Opinion/A.66.290.pdf.
Rt Hon Lord McNally. Letter. The Functions, Powers and Resources of the Information Commissioner: Government Response to the Committee’s Ninth Report of Session 2012–13 (30 June 2013), at www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmjust/560/56004.htm.
Ruggie, J. ‘Business and human rights: Further steps towards the operationalization of the “protect, respect and remedy” framework’ (April 2010), at www.reports-and-materials.org/Ruggie-report-2010.pdf (last visited 5 August 2011).
Ruggie, J. ‘Business and human rights: towards operationalizing the “protect, respect and remedy” framework’ (2009), at www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/11session/A.HRC.11.13.pdf.
Ruggie, J. ‘Guiding principles on business and human rights: implementing the United Nations “protect, respect and remedy” framework’ (March 2011), at www.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/ruggie/ruggie-guiding-principles-21-mar-2011.pdf.
Ruggie, J. ‘Protect, respect and remedy: a framework for business and human rights: Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises’ (2008), at www.reports-and-materials.org/Ruggie-report-7-Apr-2008.pdf.
Ruggie, J. ‘State obligations to provide access to remedy for human rights abuses by third parties, including business: an overview of international and regional provisions, commentary and decisions’ (Addendum) (2009), at www.reports-and-materials.org/Ruggie-addendum-15-May-2009.doc.
Safer Children in a Digital World: The Report of the Byron Review (Crown copyright, 2008).
Twentyfifty. The Private Sector and Human Rights in the UK (October 2009).
UK Government. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A Government Update’ (DTI, May 2004).
United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: An Interpretive Guide (2012).
United Nations Global Compact. Corporate Citizenship in the World Economy (October 2008).
Utting, P. ‘Rethinking business regulation: from self-regulation to social control’, Technology, Business and Society Programme Paper Number 15, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (2005).
van Eijk, N.Search Engines, the New Bottleneck for Content Access, Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012–21.
Verbiest, T. et al. Study on the Liability of Internet Intermediaries, Markt/2006/09/E (November 2007), at http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/e-commerce/docs/study/liability/final_report_en.pdf.
Volokh, E., and Falk, D. M.. ‘First Amendment protection for search engine search results’ (white paper commissioned by Google) (2012), at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2055364.
Walker, C., and Akdeniz, Y.. ‘The governance of the Internet in Europe with special reference to illegal and harmful content’, at www.cyber-rights.org/documents/CrimLR_ya_98.pdf.
Westminster eForum. Transcript. Taming the Wild Web? – Online Content Regulation (London: 11 February 2009).
Wild, L.Democracy in the Age of Modern Communications: An Outline (2008) Paper for Freedom of Expression Project, Global Partners & Associates.
Interview with Fry, Stephen, at http://www.videojug.com/interview/stephen-fry-web-20 (last visited 22 July 2011).
Agence France-Press. ‘Russia censors media by blocking websites and popular blog’ (4 March 2014) at www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/14/russia-bans-alexei-navalny-blog-opposition-news-websites.
Alexander, A. ‘Internet role in Egypt’s protests’ (9 February 211), at www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12400319.
Almunia, J. Speech/12/372, ‘Statement of VP Almunia on the Google antitrust investigation’ (21 May 2012), at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-12-372_en.htm.
Amnesty International. Public statement. ‘Amnesty International involvement with the internet multi stakeholder initiative’ (29 October 2008), at www.amnesty.org/ar/library/asset/POL30/009/2008/es/1c327fdf-a67c-11dd-966b-0da92cc4cb95/pol300092008en.pdf.
Anderson, S. et al. ‘Top 200: the rise of corporate global power’ (4 December 2000), at http://corpwatch.org/article.php?id=377.
Annan, K. A. ‘Break the technology barrier – the world information summit’ (9 December 2003), at (9 December 2003), at www.nytimes.com/2003/12/09/opinion/09iht-edannan_ed3_.html.
Arthur, C. ‘European commission reopens Google antitrust investigation’ (8 September 2014), at www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/sep/08/european-commission-reopens-google-antitrust-investigation-after-political-storm-over-proposed-settlement.
Arthur, C. ‘Google faces deluge of requests to wipe details from search index’ (4 May 2014), at www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/may/15/hundreds-google-wipe-details-search-index-right-forgotten.
Barlow, J. P. ‘Selling wine without bottles: economy of mind on the global net’ (March 1994), at http://virtualschool.edu/mon/ElectronicFrontier/WineWithoutBottles.html.
Barrett, T. ‘To censor pro-union website, Telus blocked 766 others’ (4 August 2005), at www.labournet.net/world/0508/canada2.html.
The BBC. ‘Child abuse “big business online”’ (13 May 2010), at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/10108720.stm.
The BBC. ‘Internet access is a “fundamental rights”’ (8 March 2010), at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8548190.stm.
The BBC. ‘Luminaries look to the future web’, at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7373717.stm.
The BBC. ‘Online pornography to be blocked by default, PM announces’ (22 July 2013), at www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23401076.
The BBC. ‘Quango list shows 192 to be axed’ (14 October 2010), at www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11538534.
Beckett, C. ‘SuperMedia: the future as “networked journalism”’ (10 June 2008), at www.opendemocracy.net/article/supermedia-the-networked-journalism-future.
Beckett, C. ‘State 2.0: a new front end?’ (7 September 2009), at www.opendemocracy.net/article/state-2-0-a-new-front-end.
Bello, O. ‘The Kimberley Process risks becoming irrelevant to cogent concerns’ (28 October 2013), at www.saiia.org.za/opinion-analysis/the-kimberley-process-risks-becoming-irrelevant-to-cogent-concerns.
Bennett-Smith, M. ‘Facebook vows to crack down on rape joke pages after successful protest, boycott’ (29 May 2013), at www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/29/facebook-rape-jokes-protest_n_3349319.html.
Berners-Lee, T. et al. ‘The Semantic Web’ (17 May 2001), at www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-semantic-web.
Cain, M. ‘Why does the PCC pretend it can do something about phone hacking?’ (31 January 2011), at http://pccwatch.co.uk/why-does-the-pcc-pretend-about-phone-hacking/.
Cameron, D. Prime Minister’s speech. ‘The internet and pornography: Prime Minister calls for action’ (22 July 2013), at www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-internet-and-pornography-prime-minister-calls-for-action.
Cerf, V. ‘Internet access is not a human rights’ (4 January 2012), at www.nytimes.com/2012/01/05/opinion/internet-access-is-not-a-human-right.html?_r=0.
Change.org. ‘We need women on British banknotes’, at www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/we-need-women-on-british-banknotes.
CNN World. ‘“Neda” becomes rallying cry for Iranian protests’ (21 June 2009), at http://articles.cnn.com/2009-06-21/world/iran.woman.twitter_1_neda-peaceful-protest-cell-phone?_s=PM:WORLD.
comScore. ‘ComScore releases January 2014 U. S. search engine rankings’ (18 February 2014), at www.comscore.com/Insights/Press_Releases/2014/2/comScore_Releases_January_2014_US_Search_Engine_Rankings.
Crete-Nishihata, M. ‘Egypt’s internet blackout: extreme example of just-in-time blocking’ (28 January 2011), at http://opennet.net/blog/2011/01/egypt%E2%80%99s-internet-blackout-extreme-example-just-time-blocking.
Curtis, S. ‘BT forces porn filter choice’ (16 December 2013), at www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/internet-security/10520537/BT-forces-porn-filter-choice.html.
Davies, L. ‘Facebook refuses to take down rape joke pages’ (30 September 2011), at www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/sep/30/facebook-refuses-pull-rape-jokepages.
Davies, C. J. ‘The hidden censors of the Internet’, Wired Magazine (June 2006), at www.wired.co.uk/wired-magazine/archive/2009/05/features/the-hidden-censors-of-the-internet.aspx?page=all.
D’Jaen, M. ‘Global Initiative to protect net privacy and freedoms launched’, e-commerce law & policy (December 2008), at www.perkinscoie.com/files/upload/PRIV_09-01_Article_Jaen.pdf.
Downes, L. ‘Why no one will join the Global Network Initiative’ (30 March 2011), at www.forbes.com/sites/larrydownes/2011/03/30/why-no-one-will-join-the-global-network-initiative/.
Electronic Frontier Foundation. Commentary. ‘Everyone who’s made a Hitler parody video, leave the room’ (20 April 2010), at www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/04/everyone-who-s-made-hitler-parody-leave-room.
Electronic Frontier Foundation. ‘GNI resignation letter’, at www.eff.org/document/gni-resignation-letter.
Electronic Frontier Foundation. Letter, at www.eff.org/files/filenode/gni/signon_letter.txt.
Enge, E. ‘6 Major Google changes reveal the future of SEO’ (30 December 2013), at http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2301719/6-Major-Google-Changes-Reveal-the-Future-of-SEO.
European Commission. IP/14/116, ‘Antitrust: commission obtains from Google comparable display of specialised search rivals’ (5 February 2014), at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-116_en.htm.
European Commission. IP/13/371, ‘Antitrust: commission seeks feedback on commitments offered by Google to address competition concerns’ (25 April 2013), at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-371_en.htm.
European Commission. Statement, ‘Statement by Commissioner Vestager on Google antitrust investigations at the European Parliament (ECON committee meeting)’ (11 November 2014), at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_STATEMENT-14-1646_en.htm.
Facebook. ‘How to report things’, at www.facebook.com/help/181495968648557.
Fallows, D. ‘Election newshounds speak up: newspaper, TV, and internet fans tell how and why they differ’, The Pew Research Center (6 February 2007), at http://pewresearch.org/pubs/406/election-newshounds-speak-up.
Feigenbaum, L. et al. ‘The semantic web in action’, Scientific American (Dec 2007), reproduced with permission, at www.thefigtrees.net/lee/sw/sciam/semantic-web-in-action.
Fiveash, K. ‘Google disappears torrent terms from autocomplete search results’ (27 January 2011), at www.theregister.co.uk/2011/01/27/google_bittorrent_terms_killed_on_autocomplete/.
Galperin, E., and O’Brien, D.. ‘Russia blocks access to major independent news sites’ (13 March 2014), at www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/03/russia-blocks-access-major-independent-news-sites.
Ganesan, A. ‘Viewpoint: why voluntary initiatives aren’t enough’, Leading Perspectives (Spring 2009), at www.bsr.org/reports/leading-perspectives/2009/LP_Spring_2009_Voluntary_Initiatives.pdf.
Google. ‘A new approach to China’ (12 January 2010), at http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/new-approach-to-china.html.
Google. ‘A quick note about music blog removals’ (10 February 2010), at http://buzz.blogger.com/2010/02/quick-note-about-music-blog-removals.html.
Google. ‘Corporate social responsibility’, at www.google.com/intl/zh-CN/corporate/responsibility_en.html.
Google. ‘Controversial content and free expression on the web: a refresher’ (19 April 2010), at http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/controversial-contentand-free.html.
Google. ‘The Federal Trade Commission closes its antitrust review’ (3 January 2013), at http://googleblog.blogspot.ca/2013/01/the-federal-trade-commission-closes-its.html.
Google. ‘Finding more high-quality sites in search’ (24 February 2011), at http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/02/finding-more-high-quality-sites-in.html.
Google. ‘Let the music play’ (26 August 2009), at http://buzz.blogger.com/2009/08/let-music-play.html.
Google. ‘Search more securely with encrypted Google web search’ (21 May 2010), at http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/05/search-more-securely-with-encrypted.html.
Google. ‘Some weekend work that will (hopefully) enable more Egyptians to be heard’ (31 January 2011), at http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/01/some-weekend-work-that-will-hopefully.html.
Google. ‘Transparency report’, at www.google.com/transparencyreport/traffic/.
Google. ‘Webmaster guidelines’, at www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=35769.
Google Blog. ‘Controversial content and free expression on the web: a refresher’, at http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/controversial-content-and-free.html.
Grossman, W. ‘IWF reforms could pave way for UK net censorship: who is watching the watchers?’ (29 December 2006), at www.theregister.co.uk/2006/12/29/iwf_feature/page3.html.
Grossman, W. ‘IWF: what are you looking at?’ (25 March 2002), at www.independent.co.uk/news/business/analysis-and-features/iwf-what-are-you-looking-at-655425.html.
The Guardian. ‘Occupy protests around the world: full list visualised’, at www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2011/oct/17/occupy-protests-world-list-map.
Halfacree, G. ‘Government extends porn filter to “extremist” content’ (29 November 2013), at www.bit-tech.net/news/bits/2013/11/29/extremism-filter/1.
Halliday, J. ‘Google search results may indicate “right to be forgotten” censorship’ (8 June 2014), at www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/08/google-search-results-indicate-right-to-be-forgotten-censorship.
Halliday, J. ‘Google Street View: information commissioner shackled by Data Protection Act’ (28 October 2010), at www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/oct/28/google-street-view-information-commissioner.
Halliday, J. ‘Google Street View broke Canada’s privacy law with Wi-Fi capture’ (20 October 2010), at www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/oct/19/google-street-view-privacy-canada.
Hudson, A. ‘Turkey lifts its ban on YouTube-agency’ (30 October 2010), at http://uk.reuters.com/article/2010/10/30/oukin-uk-turkey-youtube-idUKTRE69T1JE20101030.
The Huffington Post. ‘Neda video wins Polk Award: Iran protest death video first anonymous winner of journalism prize’ (16 February 2010, at www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/16/neda-video-wins-polk-award_n_463378.html.
Information Commissioner’s Office. News release. ‘ICO fines former ACS Law boss for lax IT security’, at www.ico.gov.uk/~/media/documents/pressreleases/2011/monetary_penalty_acslaw_news_release_20110510.ashx.
ISPreview. Top 10 UK ISPs, at www.ispreview.co.uk/review/top10.php.
ISPreview. ‘UK government seeking to expand website blocking remit through IWF’ (9 June 2011), at www.ispreview.co.uk/story/2011/06/09/uk-government-seeking-to-expand-website-blocking-remit-through-iwf.html.
Jaume-Palasi, L. ‘“Google Spain case”: court decision privatises the public sphere’ (27 May 2014), at http://policyreview.info/articles/news/google-spain-case-court-decision-privatises-public-sphere/291.
Jeffries, S. ‘A rare interview with Jürgen Habermas’, The Financial Times (30 April 2010), at www.ft.com/cms/s/0/eda3bcd8-5327-11df-813e-00144feab49a.html.
Johnson, B. ‘Amnesty criticises Global Network Initiative for online freedom of speech’ (30 October 2008), at www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/oct/30/amnesty-global-network-initiative.
Kain, E. ‘Reddit makes headlines boycotting GoDaddy over online censorship bills’ (26 December 2011), at www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2011/12/26/reddit-makes-headlines-boycotting-godaddy-over-online-censorship-bills/.
Kiss, J. ‘Facebook’s 10th birthday: from college dorm to 1.23 billion users’ (4 February 2014), at www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/04/facebook-10-years-mark-zuckerberg.
Kopytoff, V. G. ‘Sites like Twitter absent from free speech pact’ (6 March 2011), at www.nytimes.com/2011/03/07/technology/07rights.html.
Kravets, D. ‘What’s fueling Midest protests? It’s more than Twitter’ (28 January 2011), at www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-01/28/middle-east-protests-twitter?page=all.
Letsch, C., and Rushe, D.. ‘Turkey blocks YouTube amid “national security” concerns’ (28 March 2014), at www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/27/google-youtube-ban-turkey-erdogan.
MacAskill, E. ‘Wikileaks website pulled by Amazon after US political pressure’, at www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/dec/01/wikileaks-website-cables-servers-amazon.
Marsden, C. ‘Corporate responsibilities in times of civil unrest: the case of Egypt and Vodafone’ (July 2011), at www.networkedcranfield.com/doughty/Document%20Library/Hot%20Topics/Corporate%20Responsibilities%20in%20Times%20of%20Civil%20Unrest%20the%20case%20of%20Egypt%20and%20Vodafone.pdf.
Melik, J. ‘Diamonds: does the Kimberley Process work?’ (28 June 2010), at www.bbc.co.uk/news/10307046.
Metz, C. ‘Google’s “Musicblogocide” blame the DMCA’ (11 February 2010), at www.theregister.co.uk/2010/02/11/google_musicblogocide_2010/.
Metz, C. ‘IWF confirms Wayback Machine porn blacklisting’ (14 January 2009), at www.theregister.co.uk/2009/01/14/iwf_details_archive_blacklisting/.
Michaels, S. ‘Google shuts down music blogs without warning’ (11 February 2010), at www.guardian.co.uk/music/2010/feb/11/google-deletes-music-blogs.
Morton, G. ‘Muslim leader drops Ezra Levant cartoon complaint’ (12 February 2008), at www.nationalpost.com/news/canada/story.html?id=303895.
Mulholland, H. ‘Government targets extremist websites’ (17 January 2008), at www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/jan/17/uksecurity.terrorism.
Nakashima, E. ‘Sexual threats stifle some female bloggers’ (30 April 2007), at www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/29/AR2007042901555.html.
Netmarketshare. ‘Search engine market share’, at www.netmarketshare.com/search-engine-market-share.aspx?qprid=4&qpcustomd=0.
Noman, H. ‘Saudi Arabia to impose restrictions on online content production, including on YouTube’ (3 December 2013), at https://opennet.net/blog/2013/12/saudi-arabia-impose-restrictions-online-content-production-including-youtube.
Nyaira, S. ‘Kimberley Process in turmoil after chairman clears Zimbabwe diamond sales’ (23 March 2011), at www.voanews.com/zimbabwe/news/Kimberley-Process-In-Turmoil-After-Chairman-Allows-Zimbabwes-Marange-Gems-Trade-118509874.html.
Oates, J. ‘ICO reopens Google Street View privacy probe’ (25 October 2010), at www.theregister.co.uk/2010/10/25/ico_google_probe/.
Ofcom. ‘Identifying appropriate regulatory solutions: principles for analysing self- and co-regulation’ (10 December 2008), at http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/coregulation/statement/statement.pdf.
Office of National Statistics. ‘Internet access – households and individuals, 2013’, at www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/rdit2/internet-access–-households-and-individuals/2013/stb-ia-2013.html.
Office for National Statistics. ‘Internet access 2010’, at http://www.statistics.gov.uk/pdfdir/iahi0810.pdf.
O’Reilly, T. ‘What is Web 2.0’ (30 September 2005), at http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html.
Out-Law. ‘Super-injunction Twitter user in contempt of court if tweets were true’ (10 May 2011), at www.theregister.co.uk/2011/05/10/super_injunctions_tweeter_in_trouble_if_its_true/.
Out-Law.com. ‘Why the IWF was wrong to lift its ban on a Wikipedia page’ (11 December 2008), at www.out-law.com/page-9653.
Out-Law.com. ‘Information Commissioner gets power to fine for privacy breaches’ (12 May 2008), at www.out-law.com/page-9110.
Palfrey, J. ‘Testimony on internet filtering and surveillance’ at http://jpalfrey.andover.edu/2008/05/20/testimony-on-internet-filtering-and-surveillance/.
Pauli, D. ‘Australia’s Web blacklist leaked’ Computer World (19 March 2009), at www.computerworld.com.au/article/296161/australia_web_blacklist_leaked/.
Petley, J.Web Control’, Index on Censorship, 38(1) (2009) 78.
Pew Research Center. ‘Internet use over time’ (September 2013), at www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/internet-use/internet-use-over-time/.
Press Association. ‘Two face jail over Twitter abuse of banknote campaigner’ (24 January 2014), at www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jan/24/two-face-jail-twitter-abuse.
Privacy International. ‘Civil liberties groups say UK information commissioner’s office is not “fit for purpose”’ (3 November 2010), at www.privacyinternational.org/article/civil-liberties-groups-say-uk-information-commissioner%E2%80%99s-office-not-fit-purpose.
Rainey, J. ‘Barack Obama can thank “citizen journalist” for “bitter” tempest’ (15 April 2008), at http://articles.latimes.com/print/2008/apr/15/nation/na-bitter15.
Reporters Without Borders. ‘Why reporters without borders is not endorsing the global principles on freedom of expression and privacy for ICT companies operating in internet-restricting countries’ (28 October 2008), at http://en.rsf.org/why-reporters-without-borders-is-28-10-2008,29117.html.
Reuters. ‘PCC clears Murdoch paper over hacking claim’ (9 November 2009), at www.independent.co.uk/news/media/press/pcc-clears-murdoch-paper-over-hacking-claim-1817573.html.
Rhoads, C., and Fowler, G. A.. ‘Egypt shuts down internet, cellphone services’, The Wall Street Journal (29 January 2011), at http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703956604576110453371369740.html?mod=googlenews_wsj.
Robinson, J. ‘PCC to re-examine News of the World phone-hacking evidence’, at www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/sep/21/phone-hacking-news-of-the-world.
Ruggie, J. ‘The past as prologue? a moment of truth for UN business and human rights treaty’ at www.ihrb.org/commentary/past-as-prologue.html#_edn2.
Salkowitz, R. ‘Politicans seek “new” new media for 2012 run’ (21 April 2011), at www.internetevolution.com/author.asp?section_id=697&doc_id=205850&f_src=internetevolution_gnews%3Cbr%20/%3E.
Science Daily. ‘Google flu trends estimates off, study finds’, at www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/05/100517101714.htm (last visited 27 July 2011).
Sky News. ‘Paedophiles target virtual world’ (31 October 2007), at http://news.sky.com/home/article/1290719.
Starr, S.Internet Freedom’, New Humanist, 117(1) (2002).
StatCounter. ‘Search engine market share as at April 2014’ from http://theeword.co.uk/seo-manchester/february_2014_uk_search_engine_market_share_stats.html.
Statistic Brain. ‘Google annual search statistics’, at www.statisticbrain.com/google-searches/.
Stephens, M. ‘Only the powerful will benefit from the ‘right to be forgotten’’ (18 May 2014), at www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/18/powerful-benefit-right-to-be-forgotten.
Strom, S., and Helft, M.. ‘Google finds it hard to reinvent philanthropy’, at www.nytimes.com/2011/01/30/business/30charity.html?_r=1.
Telegraph. ‘Hitler downfall parodies: 25 worth watching’ (6 October 2009), at www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/6262709/Hitler-Downfall-parodies-25-worth-watching.html.
Tripathi, S. ‘How businesses have responded in Egypt’ (7 February 2011), at www.ihrb.org/commentary/staff/how_businesses_have_responded_in_egypt.html.
Tripathi, S. ‘How should internet and phone companies respond in Egypt?’ (4 February 2011), at www.ihrb.org/commentary/staff/internet_providers_in_egypt.html.
UN News Centre. ‘UN Human Rights Council endorses principles to ensure businesses respect human rights’ (16 June 2011), at www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=38742&Cr=human±rights&Cr1=.
Villelabeitia, I. ‘Turkey reinstates YouTube ban’ (3 November 2010), at www.reuters.com/article/2010/11/03/us-turkey-youtube-idUSTRE6A227C20101103.
Wearden, G. ‘Bank of England turns to Google to shed light on economic trends’ (13 June 2011), at www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/jun/13/bank-of-england-google-searches?intcmp=239.
WorldWideWebSize. ‘The size of the World Wide Web’, at www.worldwidewebsize.com/.
Barack Obama 2012, at www.barackobama.com/get-involved.
The British Board of Film Classification, at www.bbfc.co.uk.
Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, at www.business-humanrights.org/Home.
Canadian Centre for Child Protection Inc. at www.cybertip.ca/app/en/.
Center for Justice and Accountability, at http://cja.org/article.php?id=435.
Change.org, at www.change.org.
Chilling Effects, at www.chillingeffects.org.
CorpWatch, at www.corpwatch.org.
Creative Commons, at http://creativecommons.org/.
The Danish Institute for Human Rights, at www.humanrights.dk/.
Darfur Is Dying, at www.darfurisdying.com/.
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, at www.bis.gov.uk/.
Electronic Frontier Foundation, at www.eff.org.
Electronic Industry Citizenship Coalition, at www.eicc.info/.
European Digital Rights (EDRI), at www.edri.org/.
Freedom of Information (Archive), at www.foi.gov.uk.
Global Business Initiative on Human Rights, at www.global-business-initiative.org.
Global Movement for a Binding Treaty at www.treatymovement.com.
Google.org Initiative, at www.google.org.
Institute for Human Rights and Business, at www.ihrb.org.
Information Commissioner’s Office, at www.ico.gov.uk/.
The Intellectual Property Office, at www.ipo.gov.uk.
International Answer, at www.answercoalition.org.
International Standards Organization, at www.iso.org/iso/home.htm.
Internet Live Stats, at www.internetlivestats.com.
Internet Rights and Principles Coalition, at http://internetrightsandprinciples.org/.
The Internet Service Providers’ Association, at www.ispa.org.uk/.
Internet Watch Foundation, at www.iwf.org.uk.
mySociety, at www.mysociety.org.
Nominet, at www.nominet.org.
Office of Communication (Ofcom), at www.ofcom.org.uk/about/.
The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, at www.ohchr.org/.
Office of the Information Commissioner of Canada, at www.oic-ci.gc.ca/eng/.
The Press Complaints Commission, at www.pcc.org.uk/.
Privacy International, at www.privacyinternational.org.
Roger Darlington’s website, at www.rogerdarlington.co.uk/iwf.html#Introduction.
Search Engine History, at www.searchenginehistory.com.
Social Accountability International, at http://www.sa-intl.org/.
True Vision, at www.report-it.org.uk/home.
United for Peace and Justice, at www.unitedforpeace.org.
United Nations Global Compact, at www.unglobalcompact.org.
Virtual Global Task Force, at www.virtualglobaltaskforce.com/what-we-do/.