Aaker, J., Rudd, M., & Mogilner, C. (2011). If money does not make you happy, consider time. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(2), 126–130.Google Scholar

Aaker, J. & Smith, A. (2010). The Dragonfly Effect. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Adler, N. E., Marmot, M., McEwen, B. S., & Stewart, J. (1999). Socioeconomic Status and Health in Industrial Nations: Social, Psychological and Biological Pathways. New York: Ann NY Acad Sci.Google Scholar

Aknin, L. B., Barrington-Leigh, C. B., Dunn, E. W., Helliwell, J. F., Burns, J., Biswas-Diener, R., Kemeza, I., Nyende, P., Ashton-James, C. E., & Norton, M. I. (2013). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 635–652.Google Scholar

Aknin, L. B., Dunn, E. W., & Norton, M. I. (2012). Happiness runs in a circular motion: Evidence for a positive feedback loop between prosocial spending and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(2), 347–355.Google Scholar

Aknin, L. B., Dunn, E. W., Sandstrom, G. M., & Norton, M. I. (2013). Does social connection turn good deeds into good feelings? On the value of putting the “social” in prosocial spending. International Journal of Happiness and Development, 1(2), 155–171.Google Scholar

Aknin, L. B., Hamlin, J. K., & Dunn, E. W. (2012). Giving leads to happiness in young children. PLoS One, 7(6), e39211.Google Scholar

Aknin, L. B., Norton, M. I., & Dunn, E. W. (2009). From wealth to well-being? Money matters, but less than people think. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(6), 523–527.Google Scholar

Aknin, L. B., Sandstrom, G. M., Dunn, E. W., & Norton, M. I. (2011). It's the recipient that counts: Spending money on strong social ties leads to greater happiness than spending on weak social ties. PLoS One, 6(2), e17018.Google Scholar

Aknin, L. B., Dunn, E. W., Whillans, A. V., Grant, A. M., & Norton, M. I. (2013). Making a difference matters: Impact unlocks the emotional benefits of prosocial spending. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 88, 90–95.Google Scholar

Anik, L., & Norton, M. I. (2014). Matchmaking promotes happiness. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 644–652.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., Aaker, J. L., & Garbinsky, E. N. (2013). Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life. Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 505–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellezza, S., Gino, F., & Keinan, A. (2014). The red sneakers effect: Inferring status and competence from signals of nonconformity. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 35–54.Google Scholar

Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What makes online content viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49(2), 192–205.Google Scholar

Bhattacharjee, A., & Mogilner, C. (2014). Happiness from ordinary and extraordinary experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 1–17.Google Scholar

Botti, S., & Hsee, C. K. (2010). Dazed and confused: How the temporal costs of choice freedom lead to undesirable outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112(2), 161–171.Google Scholar

Botti, S., & McGill, A. L. (2006). When choosing is not deciding: The effect of perceived responsibility on satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(2), 211–219.Google Scholar

Buechel, E. C., & Janiszewski, C. (2014). A lot of work or a work of art: How the structure of a customized assembly task determines the utility derived from assembly effort. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 960–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caprariello, P. A., & Reis, H. T. (2013). To do, to have, or to share? Valuing experiences over material possessions depends on the involvement of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 199–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carter, T. J., & Gilovich, T. (2010). The relative relativity of material and experiential purchases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(1), 146–159.Google Scholar

Carter, T. J., & Gilovich, T. (2012). I am what I do, not what I have: The differential centrality of experiential and material purchases to the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1304–1317.Google Scholar

Chan, C., & Mogilner, C. (2014). Experiential gifts are more socially connecting than material gifts. (Working paper.)Google Scholar

Chan, E., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2010). When choosing makes a good thing better: Temporal variations in the valuation of hedonic consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(3), 497–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chernev, A. (2003). When more is less and less is more: The role of ideal point availability and assortment in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 170–183.Google Scholar

Cowley, E. (2008). The perils of hedonic editing. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(1), 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeCarlo, T. E., & Barone, M. J. (2009). With suspicious (but happy) minds: Mood's ability to neutralize the effects of suspicion on persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(3), 326–333.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diehl, K., & Poynor, C. (2010). Great expectations?! Assortment size, expectations, and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 312–322.Google Scholar

Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? A literature review and guide to needed research. Social Indicators Research, 57(2), 119–169.Google Scholar

Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319(5870), 1687–1688.Google Scholar

Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2014). Prosocial spending and happiness: Using money to benefit others pays off. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 41–47.Google Scholar

Dunn, E., & Norton, M. (2013). Happy Money: The Science of Smarter Spending. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Dunn, E. W., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2011). If money doesn't make you happy, then you probably aren't spending it right. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(2), 115–125.Google Scholar

Etkin, J. & Mogilner, C. (2015). Does variety increase happiness? (Working paper.)Google Scholar

Franke, N., Schreier, M., & Kaiser, U. (2010). The “I designed it myself” effect in mass customization. Management Science, 56(1), 125–140.Google Scholar

Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. The Economic Journal, 110(446), 918–938.Google Scholar

Gilovich, T., Kumar, A., & Jampol, L. (in press). A wonderful life: Experiential consumption and the pursuit of happiness. Journal of Consumer Psychology.Google Scholar

Gino, F., & Mogilner, C. (2014). Time, money, and morality. Psychological Science, 25(2), 414–421.Google Scholar

Godes, D., & Mayzlin, D. (2004). Using on-line conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Science, 23(4), 545–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godes, D., & Mayzlin, D. (2009). Firm-created word-of-mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Science, 28(4), 721–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gourville, J. T., & Soman, D. (2005). Overchoice and assortment type: When and why variety backfires. Marketing Science, 24(3), 382–395.Google Scholar

Gu, Y., Botti, S., & Faro, D. (2013). Turning the page: The impact of choice closure on satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(2), 268–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haisley, E., Mostafa, R., & Loewenstein, G. (2008). Subjective relative income and lottery ticket purchases. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21(3), 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, G., & Howell, R. T. (2014). Moderators and mediators of pro-social spending and well-being: The influence of values and psychological need satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 69–74.Google Scholar

Howell, R. T., & Hill, G. (2009). The mediators of experiential purchases: Determining the impact of psychological needs satisfaction and social comparison. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(6), 511–522.Google Scholar

Hsee, C. K., Yang, Y., Gu, Y., & Chen, J. (2009). Specification seeking: How product specifications influence consumer preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(6), 952–966.Google Scholar

Hsee, C. K., Yang, A. X., & Wang, L. (2010). Idleness aversion and the need for justified busyness. Psychological Science, 21(7), 926–930.Google Scholar

Hsee, C. K., & Zhang, J. (2004). Distinction bias: Misprediction and mischoice due to joint evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(5), 680–695.Google Scholar

Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 346–357.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(38), 16489–16493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2006). Would you be happier if you were rich? A focusing illusion. Science, 312(5782), 1908–1910.Google Scholar

Keinan, A., & Kivetz, R. (2011). Productivity orientation and the consumption of collectable experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(6), 935–950.Google Scholar

Kramer, A. D., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(24), 8788–8790.Google Scholar

Kross, E., Verduyn, P., Demiralp, E., Park, J., Lee, D. S., Lin, N., & Shablack, H. (2013). Facebook use predicts declines in subjective well-being in young adults. PLoS One, 8(8), e69841.Google Scholar

Kumar, A., Killingsworth, M. A., & Gilovich, T. (2014). Waiting for Merlot: Anticipatory consumption of experiential and material purchases. Psychological Science, 25(10) 1924–1931.Google Scholar

Kuziemko, I., Buell, R. W., Reich, T., & Norton, M. I. (2014). Last-place aversion: Evidence and redistributive implications. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129, 105–149.Google Scholar

Labroo, A. A., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2009). Lay theories of emotion transience and the search for happiness: A fresh perspective on affect regulation. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 242–254.Google Scholar

Labroo, A. A., & Patrick, V. M. (2009). Psychological distancing: Why happiness helps you see the big picture. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(5), 800–809.Google Scholar

Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(2), 311–328.Google Scholar

Langer, E. J., & Rodin, J. (1976). The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: A field experiment in an institutional setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 191–198.Google Scholar

Larsen, J. T., & McKibban, A. R. (2008). Is happiness having what you want, wanting what you have, or both? Psychological Science, 19(4), 371–377.Google Scholar

Lee, Y. H., & Qiu, C. (2009). When uncertainty brings pleasure: The role of prospect imageability and mental imagery. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(4), 624–633.Google Scholar

Lehmann, D. R. (1998). Customer reactions to variety: Too much of a good thing? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(1), 62–65.Google Scholar

Liu, W., & Aaker, J. (2008). The happiness of giving: The time-ask effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 543–557.Google Scholar

Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Meloy, M. G., Russo, E., & Miller, E. G. (2006). Monetary incentives and mood. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(2), 267–275.Google Scholar

Mick, D. (2005, September). The Presidential Address: Meaning and Mattering through Transformative Consumer Research. Speech presented at the North American Conference of the Association for Consumer Research, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar

Mochon, D., Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2008). Getting off the hedonic treadmill, one step at a time: The impact of regular religious practice and exercise on well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(5), 632–642.Google Scholar

Mochon, D., Norton, M. I., & Ariely, D. (2012). Bolstering and restoring feelings of competence via the IKEA effect. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(4), 363–369.Google Scholar

Mogilner, C. (2010). The pursuit of happiness: Time, money, and social connection. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1348–1354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mogilner, C., & Aaker, J. (2009). “The time vs. money effect”: Shifting product attitudes and decisions through personal connection. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 277–291.Google Scholar

Mogilner, C., Aaker, J., & Kamvar, S. D. (2012). How happiness affects choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(2), 429–443.Google Scholar

Mogilner, C., Chance, Z., & Norton, M. I. (2012). Giving time gives you time. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1233–1238.Google Scholar

Mogilner, C., Kamvar, S. D., & Aaker, J. (2011). The shifting meaning of happiness. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 395–402.Google Scholar

Mogilner, C., & Norton, M. (2015). Choice of happiness: Experienced versus remembered. (Working paper.)Google Scholar

Mogilner, C., Rudnick, T., & Iyengar, S. S. (2008). The mere categorization effect: How the presence of categories increases choosers’ perceptions of assortment variety and outcome satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(2), 202–215.Google Scholar

Mogilner, C., Shiv, B., & Iyengar, S. S. (2013). Eternal quest for the best: Sequential (vs. simultaneous) option presentation undermines choice commitment. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1300–1312.Google Scholar

Moreau, C. P., Bonney, L., & Herd, K. B. (2011). It's the thought (and the effort) that counts: How customizing for others differs from customizing for oneself. Journal of Marketing, 75(5), 120–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicolao, L., Irwin, J. R., & Goodman, J. K. (2009). Happiness for sale: Do experiential purchases make consumers happier than material purchases? Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 188–198.Google Scholar

Norton, M. I., Anik, L., Aknin, L. B., & Dunn, E. W. (2011). Is life nasty, brutish, and short? Philosophies of life and well-being. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(6), 570–575.Google Scholar

Norton, M. I., Frost, J. H., & Ariely, D. (2007). Less is more: The lure of ambiguity, or why familiarity breeds contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 97–105.Google Scholar

Norton, M. I., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2012). The IKEA effect: When labor leads to love. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 453–460.Google Scholar

Ordabayeva, N., & Chandon, P. (2011). Getting ahead of the Joneses: When equality increases conspicuous consumption among bottom-tier consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 27–41.Google Scholar

Poynor, C., & Wood, S. (2010) Smart subcategories: How assortment formats influence consumer learning and satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(1), 159–175.Google Scholar

Qiu, C., & Yeung, C. W. (2008). Mood and comparative judgment: Does mood influence everything and finally nothing? Journal of Consumer Research, 34(5), 657–669.Google Scholar

Quoidbach, J., Gruber, J., Mikolajczak, M., Kogan, A., Kotsou, I. & Norton, M. I. (2014). Emodiversity and the emotional ecosystem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 2057–2066.Google Scholar

Raghunathan, R., & Corfman, K. (2006). Is happiness shared doubled and sadness shared halved? Social influence on enjoyment of hedonic experiences. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 386–394.Google Scholar

Ramanathan, S., & McGill, A. L. (2007). Consuming with others: Social influences on moment-to-moment and retrospective evaluations of an experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 506–524.Google Scholar

Redden, J. P. (2008). Reducing satiation: The role of categorization level. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(5), 624–634.Google Scholar

Rosenzweig, E., & Gilovich, T. (2012). Buyer's remorse or missed opportunity? Differential regrets for material and experiential purchases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 215–223.Google Scholar

Rucker, D. D., Dubois, D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). Generous paupers and stingy princes: Power drives consumer spending on self versus others. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(6), 1015–1029.Google Scholar

Rudd, M., Vohs, K., & Aaker, J. (2012). Awe expands people's perception of time, alters decision making and enhances well-being. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1130–1136.Google Scholar

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.Google Scholar

Seligman, M. E. P. (1998, September). The President's Address (Annual Report). Speech presented at the National Press Club, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Sellier, A. L., & Avnet, T. (2014). So what if the clock strikes? Scheduling style, control, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Attitudes and Social Cognition, 107(5), 791–808.Google Scholar

Shah, A. K., & Alter, A. L. (2014). Consuming experiential categories. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4).Google Scholar

Simonson, I. (1990). The effect of purchase quantity and timing on variety seeking behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(2), 150–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Su, R., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2014). The development and validation of Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (CIT) and Brief Inventory of Thriving (BIT). Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being.Google Scholar

Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2003). To do or to have? That is the question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1193–1202.Google Scholar

Vohs, K. D., Wang, Y., Gino, F., & Norton, M. I. (2013). Rituals enhance consumption. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1714–1721.Google Scholar

Whitchurch, E. R., Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2010). “He loves me, he loves me not …”: Uncertainty can increase romantic attraction. Psychological Science, 22, 172–175.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The Spirit Level: Why Equality Is Better for Everyone. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Wilson, T. D., Centerbar, D. B., Kermer, D. A., & Gilbert, D. T. (2005). The pleasures of uncertainty: Prolonging positive moods in ways people do not anticipate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 5–21.Google Scholar

Yang, A. X., Hsee, C. K., Liu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2011). The supremacy of singular subjectivity: Improving decision quality by removing objective specifications and comparisons. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(4), 393–404.Google Scholar

Zauberman, G., Ratner, R. K., & Kim, K. (2009). Memories as assets: Strategic memory protection in choice over time. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(5), 715–728.Google Scholar

Abelson, R. P. (1995). Attitude extremity. In Petty, R. E. & Krosnick, J. A. (eds.), Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences (pp. 25–42). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Akhtar, O., Paunesku, D., & Tormala, Z. L. (2013). Weak > strong: The ironic effect of argument strength on supportive advocacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1214–1226.Google Scholar

Barden, J., & Petty, R. E. (2008). The mere perception of elaboration creates attitude certainty: Exploring the thoughtfulness heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 489–509.Google Scholar

Barden, J., & Tormala, Z. L. (2014). Elaboration and attitude strength: The new meta-cognitive perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 17–29.Google Scholar

Bassili, J. N. (1996) Meta-Judgmental versus operative indices of psychological properties: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 637–653.Google Scholar

Berger, J. (2014). Word-of-mouth and interpersonal communication: An organizing framework and directions for future research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24, 586–607.Google Scholar

Bizer, G. Y., Larsen, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (2011). Exploring the valence-framing effect: Negative framing enhances attitude strength. Political Psychology, 32, 59–80.Google Scholar

Bizer, G. Y., & Petty, R. E. (2005). How we conceptualize our attitudes matters: The effects of valence framing on the resistance of political attitudes. Political Psychology, 26, 553–568.Google Scholar

Blankenship, K. L., Nesbit, S. M., & Murray, R. A. (2013). Driving anger and metacognition: The role of thought confidence on anger and aggressive driving intentions. Aggressive Behavior, 39, 323–334.Google Scholar

Bohner, G., Ruder, M., & Erb, H.-P. (2002). When expertise backfires: Contrast and assimilation effects in persuasion. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 495–519.Google Scholar

Boninger, D. S., Krosnick, J. A., Berent, M. K., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1995). The causes and consequences of attitude importance. In Petty, R. E. & Krosnick, J. A. (eds.), Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences (pp. 159–190). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265–289.Google Scholar

Briñol, P., Becerra, A., Díaz, D., Horcajo, J., Valle, C., & Gallardo, I. (2005). The impact of need for cognition on interpersonal influence. Psicothema, 17, 666–671.Google Scholar

Briñol, P. & DeMarree, K. G., eds. (2012) Social Metacognition. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Briñol, P., McCaslin, M. J., & Petty, R. E. (2012). Self-generated persuasion: Effects of the target and direction of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 925–940.Google Scholar

Briñol, P. & Petty, R. E (2003) Overt head movements and persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1123–1139.Google Scholar

Briñol, P. & Petty, R. E (2005). Individual differences in persuasion. In Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (eds.), The Handbook of Attitudes and Attitude Change (pp. 575–616). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Briñol, P. & Petty, R. E (2008). Embodied persuasion: Fundamental processes by which bodily responses can impact attitudes. In Semin, G. R. & Smith, E. R. (eds.), Embodiment Grounding: Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches (pp. 184–207). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Briñol, P. & Petty, R. E (2009a). Source factors in persuasion: A self-validation approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 49–96.Google Scholar

Briñol, P. & Petty, R. E (2009b). Persuasion: Insights from the self-validation hypothesis. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41, (pp. 69–118). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Briñol, P. & Petty, R. E (2012). The history of attitudes and persuasion research. In Kruglanski, A. & Stroebe, W. (eds.), Handbook of the History Of Social Psychology (pp. 285–320). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., & Barden, J. (2007). Happiness versus sadness as determinants of thought confidence in persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 711–727.Google Scholar

Briñol, P., Petty, R. E, & DeMarree, K. (2015). Being threatened and being a threat can increase reliance on thoughts: A self-validation approach. In Carroll, P. J., Arkin, R. M., & Wichman, A. (eds.), Handbook on Personal Security (pp. 37–54). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., & McCaslin, M. (2009). Changing attitudes on implicit versus explicit measures: What is the difference? In Petty, R. E., Fazio, R. H., & Briñol, P. (eds.). Attitudes: Insights from the New Implicit Measures (pp. 285–326). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., & Tormala, Z. L. (2004). The self-validation of cognitive responses to advertisements. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 559–573.Google Scholar

Briñol, P., Petty, R. E. & Wagner, B. C. (2009) Body postures effects on self-evaluation: A self-validation approach. European Journal of Social Psychology 39, 1053–64.Google Scholar

Briñol, P., Petty, R. E. & Wagner, B. C. (2012). Embodied validation: Our body can change and also validate our thoughts. In Briñol, P. & DeMarree, K. G. (eds.), Social Metacognition (pp. 219–240). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., & Wheeler, S. C. (2006). Discrepancies between explicit and implicit self-concepts: Consequences for information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 154–170.Google Scholar

Briñol, P., Rucker, D. D., & Petty, R. E. (2015). Naïve theories about persuasion: Implication for information processing and consumer attitude change. International Journal of Advertising, 34, 85–106.Google Scholar

Briñol, P., Rucker, D., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2004). Individual differences in resistance to persuasion: The role of beliefs and meta-beliefs. In Knowles, E. S. & Linn, J. A. (eds.), Resistance and Persuasion (pp. 83–104). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Briñol, P., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2013). Ease and persuasion: Multiple processes, meanings, and effects. In Unkelbach, C. & Greifeneder, R. (eds.), The Experience of Thinking: How the Fluency of Mental Processes Influences Cognition and Behavior (pp. 101–118). London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Byrne, D. (1971). The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979). The effects of message repetition and position on cognitive responses, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 97–109.Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131.Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1989). Effects of message repetition on argument processing, recall, and persuasion. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 3–12.Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253.Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., Priester, J. R., & Berntson, G. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 5–17.Google Scholar

Calder, B. J., Insko, C., & Yandell, B. (1974). The relation of cognitive and memorial processes to persuasion in a simulated jury trial. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 62–93.Google Scholar

Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing in the use of source versus message quest in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752–766.Google Scholar

Chaiken, S., & Ledgerwood, A. (2012). A theory of heuristic and systematic information processing. In van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (pp. 246–266). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Chaiken, S. L., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In Uleman, J. S. y Bargh, J. A. (eds.), Unintended Thought (pp. 212–252). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460–473.Google Scholar

Clark, J. K., & Wegener, D. T. (2013). Message position, information processing, and persuasion: The Discrepancy Motives Model. In Devine, P. & Plant, A. (eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 47, pp. 189–232). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Clark, J. K., Wegener, D. T., Sawicki, V., Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2013). Evaluating the message or the messenger? Implications for self-validation in persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1571–1584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Clarkson, J. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Duhachek, A. L. (2010). Seeking optimality in the consumer waiting experience: The good and bad of waiting time. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Consumer Psychology, St. Petersburg, FL.Google Scholar

Clarkson, J. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Leone, C. (2011). A self-validation perspective on the mere thought effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 449–454.Google Scholar

Clarkson, J. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Rucker, D. D. (2008). A new look at the consequences of attitude certainty: The amplification hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 810–825.Google Scholar

Clarkson, J. J., Tormala, Z. L., Rucker, D. D., & Dugan, R. G. (2013). The malleable influence of social consensus on attitude certainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1019–1022.Google Scholar

Clarkson, J. J., Valente, M. J., Leone, C., & Tormala, Z. L. (2013). Motivated reflection on attitude-inconsistent information: An exploration of the role of fear of invalidity in self-persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1559–1570.Google Scholar

Clore, G. L., & Parrott, W. G. (1994). Cognitive feelings and metacognitive judgments. European Journal of Social Psychology (Special Issue), 24, 101–115.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. B., & Reed, A. (2006). A multiple pathway anchoring and adjustment (MPAA) model of attitude generation and reinforcement. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 1–15.Google Scholar

Crowley, A. E., & Hoyer, W. D. (1994). An integrative framework for understanding two-sided persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 561–574.Google Scholar

Cunningham, W. A., Packer, D. J., Kesek, A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2009). Implicit measurement of attitudes: A physiological approach. In Petty, R. E., Fazio, R. H., & Briñol, P. (eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the New Implicit Measures (pp. 485–512). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Davidson, A. R., Yantis, S., Norwood, M., & Montano, D. E. (1985). Amount of information about the attitude object and attitude–behavior consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1184–1198.Google Scholar

DeMarree, K. G., Wheeler, C. S., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2014). Wanting other attitudes: Actual–desired attitude discrepancies predict feelings of ambivalence and ambivalence consequences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 5–18.Google Scholar

Dholakia, U. M., & Morwitz, V. G. (2002). The scope and persistence of mere measurement effects: Evidence from a field study of customer satisfaction measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 159–167.Google Scholar

Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2014). The power matching effect: Psychological attunement between communicator and audience power enhances persuasion. Unpublished manuscript. INSEAD.Google Scholar

Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Tormala, Z. L. (2011). From rumors to facts, and facts to rumors: The role of certainty decay in consumer communications. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 1020–1032.Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Echterhoff, G., Higgins, T. E., Kopietz, R., & Groll, S. (2008). How communication goals determine when audience tuning biases memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 3–21.Google Scholar

Edwards, K. (1990). The interplay of affect and cognition in attitude formation and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 202–216.Google Scholar

Ein-Gar, D., Shiv, B., & Tormala, Z. L. (2012). When blemishing leads to blossoming: The positive effect of negative information. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 846–859.Google Scholar

Etgar, M., & Goodwin, S. A. (1982). One-Sided versus two-sided comparative message appeals for new brand introduction. Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 460–465.Google Scholar

Fabrigar, L. R., & Petty, R. E. (1999). The role of the affective and cognitive bases of attitudes in susceptibility to affectively and cognitively based persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 363–381.Google Scholar

Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behaviour: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 23, pp. 75–109). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In Petty, R. E. & Krosnick, J. A. (eds.), Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences (pp. 247–282). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Feldman, J. M., & Lynch, J. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 421–435.Google Scholar

Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schachter, S. (1956). When Prophecy Fails. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Festinger, L., & Thibaut, J. (1951). Interpersonal communications in small groups, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 92–100.Google Scholar

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Fleming, M. A., & Petty, R. E. (2000). Identity and persuasion: An elaboration likelihood approach. In Terry, D. J. & Hogg, M. A. (eds.), Attitudes, Behavior, and Social Context: The Role of Norms and Group Membership (pp. 171–199). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

French, J. R. P. Jr., & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In Cartwright, D. (ed.), Studies in Social Power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar

Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 1–31.Google Scholar

Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1995). Persuasion knowledge: Lay people's and researches’ beliefs about the psychology of persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 123–156.Google Scholar

Gal, D., & Rucker, D. D. (2010). When in doubt, shout! Paradoxical influences of doubt on proselytizing. Psychological Science, 20, 1–7.Google Scholar

Gawronski, B., & Payne, B. K. (2010) (eds.). Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition: Measurement, Theory, and Applications. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Gorn, G., & Goldberg, M. (1980). Children's responses to repetitive TV commercials. Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 421–425.Google Scholar

Greenwald, A. G., & Albert, R. D. (1968). Acceptance and recall of improvised arguments. Journal or Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 31–34.Google Scholar

Gross, S. R., Holtz, R., & Miller, N. (1995). Attitude certainty. In Petty, R. E. & Krosnick, J. A. (eds.), Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences (pp. 215–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Grush, J. E. (1976). Attitude formation and mere exposure phenomena: A non-artificial explanation of empirical findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 281–290.Google Scholar

Hausmann, L. R. M., Levine, J. M., & Higgins, E. T. (2008). Communication and group perception: Extending the “saying is believing” effect. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 11, 539–554.Google Scholar

Heesacker, M. H., Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1983). Field dependence and attitude change: Source credibility can alter persuasion by affecting message-relevant thinking. Journal of Personality, 51, 653–666.Google Scholar

Horcajo, J., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2014). Multiple roles for majority versus minority source status on persuasion when source status follows the message. Social Influence, 9, 37–51.Google Scholar

Horcajo, J., Petty, R. E., &, Briñol, P. (2010). The effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 498–512.Google Scholar

Hovland, C. I., Lumsdaine, A. A., & Sheffield, F. D. (1949). Experiments on Mass Communication. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Huntsinger, J. R. (2013). Incidental experiences of affective coherence and incoherence influence persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 792–802.Google Scholar

Infante, D. A. (1976). Persuasion as a function of the receiver's prior success or failure as a message source. Communication Quarterly, 24, 21–26.Google Scholar

Janis, I. L., & King, B. T. (1954). The influence of role-playing on opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 211–218.Google Scholar

Josephs, R. A., Giesler, R. B., & Silvera, D. H. (1994). Judgment by quantity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 21–32.Google Scholar

Karmarkar, U.R., & Tormala, Z.L. (2010). Believe me, I have no idea what I'm talking about: The effects of source certainty on consumer involvement and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 46, 1033–1049.Google Scholar

Kaufman, D. Q., Stasson, M. F., & Hart, J. W. (1999). Are the tabloids always wrong or it that just what we think? Need for cognition and perceptions of articles in print media. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1984–1997.Google Scholar

Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 51–60.Google Scholar

Kelman, H. C., & Hovland, C. I. (1953). “Reinstatement” of the communicator in delayed measurement of opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 327–335.Google Scholar

Killeya, L. A. & Johnson, B. T. (1998). Experimental induction of biased systematic processing: The directed-thought technique. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 17–33.Google Scholar

Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S. M., & Wilkinson, I. (1980). Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one's way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 440–452.Google Scholar

Kirmani, A., & Campbell, M. C. (2004). Goal seeker and persuasion sentry: How consumer targets respond to interpersonal marketing persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 573–582.Google Scholar

Koriat, A. (2012). The self-consistency model of subjective confidence. Psychological Review, 119, 80–113.Google Scholar

Krosnick, J. A., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In Petty, R. E. & Krosnick, J. A. (eds.), Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences (pp. 1–24). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Kruglanski, A. W., Raviv, A., Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., Sharvit, K., Ellis, S., Bar, R., Pierro, A., & Mannetti, L. (2005). Says who? Epistemic authority effects in social judgment. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 37, pp. 346–392). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Kupor, D., Tormala, Z. L., Norton, M. I., & Rucker, D. D. (2014). Thought calibration: How thinking just the right amount increases one's influence and appeal. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 263–270.Google Scholar

Labroo, A. A., Dhar, R., & Schwarz, N. (2008). Of frog wines and frowning watches: Semantic priming, perceptual fluency, and brand evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 819–831.Google Scholar

Lammers, J., Dubois, D., Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2013). Power gets the job: Priming power improves interview outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 776–779.Google Scholar

Lee, A. Y., & Labroo, A. A. (2004). The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 41, 151–165.Google Scholar

Lord, C., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109.Google Scholar

Lydon, J., Zanna, M. P., & Ross, M. (1988). Bolstering attitudes by autobiographical recall: Attitude persistence and selective memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 78–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lynch, J. G. Jr. (2006). Accessibility-diagnosticity and the multiple pathway anchoring and adjustment model. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 25–27.Google Scholar

Maio, G. R., & Thomas, G. (2007). The epistemic–teleologic model of deliberate self-persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 46−67.Google Scholar

Martin, L. L., Ward, D. W., Achee, J. W., & Wyer, R. S. (1993). Mood as input: People have to interpret the motivational implications of their moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 317–326.Google Scholar

Mayer, N. D., & Tormala, Z. L. (2010). “Think” versus “feel” framing effects in persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 443–454.Google Scholar

McGuire, W. J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. In Berkowitz, L (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 19, pp. 191–229). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Miller, R. C. (1976). Mere exposure, psychological reactance, and attitude change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40, 229–233.Google Scholar

Mills, J., & Jellison, J. M. (1967). Effect on opinion change of how desirable the communication is to the audience the communicator addressed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 98–101.Google Scholar

Morrison, K. R. (2011). A license to speak up: Outgroup minorities and opinion expression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 756–766.Google Scholar

Morrison, K. R., & Wheeler, S. C. (2010). Nonconformity defines the self: The role of minority opinion status in self-concept clarity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 297–308.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 13, pp. 209–239). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1985). Social influence and conformity. In Lindsey, G. & Aronson, E. (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (vol. 2, 3rd ed., pp. 347–412). New York: Random House.Google Scholar

O'Neal, E. C., Kipnis, D., & Craig, K. M. (1994). Effects on the persuader of employing a peripheral route technique. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 225–238.Google Scholar

Pechmann, C. (1992). Predicting when two-sided ads will be more effective than one-sided ads: The role of correlational and correspondent inferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 441–453.Google Scholar

Pelham, B. W., Sumarta, T. T., & Myaskovsky, L. (1994). The easy path from many to much: The numerosity heuristic. Cognitive Psychology, 26, 103–133.Google Scholar

Perkins, A. W., & Forehand, M. R. (2010). Implicit social cognition and indirect measures in consumer behavior. In Gawronski, B. & Payne, B. K. (eds.), Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition: Measurement, Theory, and Applications (pp. 535–547). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Petrocelli, J. V., Tormala, Z. L., & Rucker, D. D. (2007). Unpacking attitude certainty: Attitude clarity and attitude correctness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 30–41.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E. (1997). The evolution of theory and research in social psychology: From single to multiple effect and process models. In McGarty, C. & Haslam, S. A. (eds.), The Message of Social Psychology: Perspectives on Mind in Society (pp. 268–290). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2008). Persuasion: From single to multiple to meta-cognitive processes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 137–147.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2012). The Elaboration Likelihood Model. In Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A., & Higgins, E. T. (eds.), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology (vol. 1, pp. 224–245). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2015). Emotion and persuasion: Cognitive and meta-cognitive processes impact attitudes. Cognition and Emotion, 29, 1–26.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & DeMarree, K. G. (2007). The Meta-Cognitive Model (MCM) of attitudes: Implications for attitude measurement, change, and strength. Social Cognition, 25, 609–642.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., Loersch, C., & McCaslin, M. J. (2009). The Need for cognition. In Leary, M. R. & Hoyle, R. H. (eds.), Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior (pp. 318–329). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., Briñol, P. & Tormala, Z. L. (2002) Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 722–741.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., Tormala, Z. L., & Wegener, D. T. (2007). The role of meta-cognition in social judgment. In Higgins, E. T. & Kruglanski, A. W. (eds.) Social Psychology: A Handbook of Basic Principles (2nd ed., pp. 254–284). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1915–1926.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 69–81.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T. & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847–855.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 135–146.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., & Fazio, R. H., & Briñol, P., (2009). The new implicit measures: An overview. In Petty, R. E., Fazio, R. H., & Briñol, P. (eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the New Implicit Measures (pp. 3–18). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., Haugtvedt, C. P., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength: Creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predictive of behavior. In Petty, R. E. & Krosnick, J. A. (eds.), Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. (pp. 93–130). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (1995) (eds.). Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., Schumann, D. W., Richman, S. A., & Strathman, A. J. (1993). Positive mood and persuasion: Different roles for affect under high and low elaboration conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 5–20.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., Tormala, Z. L., Briñol, P., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (2006). Implicit ambivalence from attitude change: An exploration of the PAST model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 21–41.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., Tormala, Z. L., & Rucker, D. D. (2004). Resisting persuasion by counterarguing: An attitude strength perspective. In Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Prentice, D. A. (eds.), Perspectivism in Social Psychology: The Yin and Yang of Scientific Progress (pp. 37–51). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S., & Lindzey, G. (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (4th ed., vol. 1, pp. 323–390). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Petty, R. E., Wells, G. L., & Brock, T. C. (1976). Distraction can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda: Thought disruption versus effort justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 874–884.Google Scholar

Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 243–281.Google Scholar

Prislin, R., Boyle, S., Davenport, C., Farley, A., Jacobds, E.,,ichalak, J., Uehara, K., Zandian, F., & Xu, Y. (2011). On being influenced while trying to persuade: The feedback of persuasion outcomes to the persuader. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 51–58.Google Scholar

Rhine, R., & Severance, L. (1970). Ego-involvement, discrepancy, source credibility, and attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 175–190.Google Scholar

Rhodes, N., & Wood, W. (1992). Self-esteem and intelligence affect influenciability: The mediating role of message reception. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 156–171.Google Scholar

Rind, B., & Kipnis, D. (2002). Changes in self-perceptions as a result of successfully persuading others. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 141–156.Google Scholar

Rios, K., DeMarree, K. G., & Statzer, J. (2014). Attitude certainty and conflict style: Divergent effects of correctness and clarity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 819–830..Google Scholar

Rosenberg, M. J., & Hovland, C. I.(1960). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes. In Hovland, C. I., & Rosenberg, M. J. (eds.), Attitude Organization and Change: An Analysis of Consistency among Attitude Components. New Haven, CT: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Rucker, D. D., & Galisnky, A. D. (this volume). Power and consumer behavior. In Norton, M. I., Rucker, D. D., & Lamberton, C. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rucker, D. D., & Petty, R. E. (2004). When resistance is futile: Consequences of failed counterarguing for attitude certainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 219–235.Google Scholar

Rucker, D. D., Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2008). What's in a frame anyway? A meta-cognitive analysis of the impact of one versus two sided message framing on attitude certainty. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18, 137–149.Google Scholar

Rucker, D. D., & Tormala, Z. L. (2012). Meta-cognitive theory in consumer research. In Briñol, P. & DeMarree, K. (eds.), Social Metacognition (pp. 303–321). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Rucker, D. D., Tormala, Z. L., Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2014). Consumer conviction and commitment: An appraisal-based framework for attitude certainty. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24, 119–36.Google Scholar

Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Kardes, F. R., & Herr, P. M. (1992). The role of prior knowledge and missing information in multiattribute evaluation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51(1), 76–91.Google Scholar

Schwarz, N. (2004). Meta-cognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 332–348.Google Scholar

Schwarz, N., Bless, H., & Bohner, G. (1991). Mood and persuasion: Affective status influence the processing of persuasive communications. In Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 24, pp. 161–197). San Diego, CA: Academia Press.Google Scholar

Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195–202.Google Scholar

See, Y. H. M., Fabrigar, L. R., & Petty, R. E. (2013). Affective-cognitive meta-bases versus structural bases of attitudes predict processing interest versus efficiency. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1111–1123.Google Scholar

See, Y. H. M., Petty, R. E., & Fabrigar, L. R. (2008). Affective and cognitive meta-bases of attitudes: Unique effects on information interest and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 938–955.Google Scholar

Sela, A., & Berger, J. (2012). How attribute quantity influences option choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 49, 942–953.Google Scholar

Shavitt, S., Lowrey, T., Han, S., (1992). Attitude functions in advertising: The interactive role of products and self-monitoring. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1, 337–364.Google Scholar

Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Shestowsky, D., Wegener, D. T., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1998). Need for cognition and interpersonal influence: Individual differences in impact on dyadic decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1317–1328.Google Scholar

Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & Macgregor, D. G. (2002). The Affect Heuristic. In Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (eds.), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (pp. 397–420). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, C. T., De Houwer, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2013). Consider the source: Persuasion of implicit evaluations is moderated by manipulations of source credibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 193–205.Google Scholar

Smith, S. M., Fabrigar, L. R., MacDougall, B. L., & Wiesenthal, N. L. (2008). The role of amount cognitive elaboration, and structural consistency of attitude-relevant knowledge in the formation of attitude certainty. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 280–295.Google Scholar

Snyder, M., & Rothbart, M. (1971). Communicator attractiveness and opinion change. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 3, 377–387.Google Scholar

Staats, A. W., & Staats, C. (1958). Attitudes established by classical conditioning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 159–167.Google Scholar

Tesser, A. (1978). Self-generated attitude change. In Berkowitz, I. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 11, pp. 289–338). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, M. M., Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In Petty, R. E. & Krosnick, J. A. (eds.), Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Tormala, Z. L. (2008). A new framework for resistance to persuasion: The resistance appraisals hypothesis. In Crano, W. D. & Prislin, R. (eds.), Attitudes and Attitude Change (pp. 213–234). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Tormala, Z. L., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2006). When credibility attacks: The reverse impact of source credibility on persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 684–691.Google Scholar

Tormala, Z. L., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2007). Multiple roles for source credibility under high elaboration: It's all in the timing. Social Cognition, 25, 4, 536–552.Google Scholar

Tormala, Z. L, Clarkson, J. J., & Henderson, M. D. (2011). Does fast or slow evaluation foster greater certainty? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 422–434.Google Scholar

Tormala, Z. L., Clarkson, J. J., & Petty, R. E. (2006). Resisting persuasion by the skin of one's teeth: The hidden success of resisted persuasive messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91 (3), 423–435.

Tormala, Z. L., DeSensi, V. L., & Petty, R. E. (2007). Resisting persuasion by illegitimate means: A meta-cognitive perspective on minority influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 354–367.Google Scholar

Tormala, Z.L., Falces, C., Briñol, P., & Petty, R.E. (2007). Ease of retrieval effects in social judgment: The role of unrequested cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 143–157.Google Scholar

Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2002). What doesn't kill me makes me stronger: The effects of resisting persuasion on attitude certainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1298–1313.Google Scholar

Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2004a). Source credibility and attitude certainty: A metacognitive analysis of resistance to persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 427–442.Google Scholar

Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2004b). Resistance to persuasion and attitude certainty: The moderating role of elaboration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1446–1457.Google Scholar

Tormala, Z. L., Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2002). Ease of retrieval effects in persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1700–1712.Google Scholar

Tormala, Z. L., Petty, R. E., & DeSensi, V. L. (2010). Multiple roles for minority sources in persuasion and resistance. In Martin, R. & Hewstone, M. (eds.), Minority Influence and Innovation: Antecedents, Processes, and Consequences (pp. 105–131). London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Tormala, Z. L., & Rucker, D. D. (2007). Attitude certainty: A review of past findings and emerging perspectives. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 469–492.Google Scholar

Visser, P. S., & Mirabile, R. R. (2004). Attitudes in the social context: The impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 779–795.Google Scholar

Wan, E. W., Rucker, D. D., Tormala, Z. L., & Clarkson, J. J. (2010). The effect of regulatory depletion on attitude certainty. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 531–541.Google Scholar

Wänke, M., Bohner, G., & Jurkowitsch, A. (1997). There are many reasons to drive a BMW: Does imagined ease of argument generation influence attitudes? Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 170–177.Google Scholar

Wells, G. L., & Petty, R. E. (1980). The effects of overt head movements on persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of responses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 219–230.Google Scholar

Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Quellette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323–345.Google Scholar

Xu, A. J., & Wyer, R. S. (2012). The role of bolstering and counterarguing mindsets in persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 920–932.Google Scholar

Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1–27.Google Scholar

Zanna, M. P, & Rempel, J. K. (1988). Attitudes: A new look at an old concept. In Bar-Tal, D. & Kruglanski, A. W. (eds.), The Social Psychology of Attitudes (pp. 315–334). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ainslie, G. (2001). Breakdown of Will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aknin, L. B., Norton, M. I., & Dunn, E. W. (2009). From wealth to well-being? Money matters, but less than people think. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 523–527.Google Scholar

Alba, J. W., & Williams, E. F. (2013). Pleasure principles: A review of research on hedonic consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23, 2–18.Google Scholar

Baillargeon, R., Spelke, E.S., & Wasserman, S. (1985). Object permanence in five-month old infants. Cognition, 20, 191–208.Google Scholar

Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Algom, D. (2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 610–622.Google Scholar

Bartels, D. M. & Rips, L. J. (2010). Psychological connectedness and intertemporal choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 49–69.Google Scholar

Bartels, D.M. & Urminsky, O. (2011). On intertemporal selfishness: The perceived instability of identity underlies impatient consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 182–198.Google Scholar

Baucells, M. & Sarin, R. K. (2013) Determinants of experienced utility: Laws and implications. Decision Analysis, 10, 135–151.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Yielding to temptation: Self-control failure, impulsive purchasing, and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 670–676.Google Scholar

Bhargava, S., Kassam, K. S., & Loewenstein, G. (2014). A reassessment of the defense of parenthood. Psychological Science, 25, 299–302.Google Scholar

Botti, S. (2004). The psychological pleasure and pain of choosing: when people prefer choosing at the cost of subsequent outcome satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 312.Google Scholar

Boven, L. V., Loewenstein, G., Welch, E., & Dunning, D. (2012). The illusion of courage in self-predictions: Mispredicting one’s own behavior in embarrassing situations. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25, 1–12.Google Scholar

Brown, A. D., Hershfield, H. E., Kouri, N. A., & Bryant, R. A. (Under review). Old man you’re a lot like me: Similarity between current and future self mediates the relationship between episodic future thinking and temporal discounting.Google Scholar

Bruni, L., & Sugden, R. (2007). The road not taken: How psychology was removed from economics, and how it might be brought back. Economic Journal, 117, 146–173.Google Scholar

Bryan, C. J., & Hershfield, H. E. (2012). You owe it to yourself: Boosting retirement saving with a responsibility-based appeal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 429–432.Google Scholar

Buechel, E. C., Zhang, J., Morewedge, C. K., & Vosgerau, J. (2014). More intense experiences, less intense forecasts: Why affective forecasters overweight probability specifications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 20–36.Google Scholar

Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & Peetz, J. (2010). The planning fallacy: Cognitive, motivational, and social origins. In Zanna, M. P. & Olson, J. M. (eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 43, pp. 1–62). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Buehler, R., Griffin, D., Ross, M. (1994). Exploring the “planning fallacy”: Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 366–81.Google Scholar

Carstensen, L. L. (2011). A Long Bright Future. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Caruso, E. M., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2008). A wrinkle in time: Asymmetric valuation of past and future events. Psychological Science, 19, 796–801.Google Scholar

Chambers, J. R., Windschitl, P. D., & Suls, J. (2003). Egocentrism, event frequency, and comparative optimism: When what happens frequently is “more likely to happen to me.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1343–1356.Google Scholar

De Houwer, J., Custers, R., & De Clercq, A. (2006). Do smokers have a negative implicit attitude toward smoking? Cognition and Emotion, 20, 1274–1284.Google Scholar

Diehl, K., & Poynor, C. (2010). Great expectations?! Assortment size, expectations, and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 312–322.Google Scholar

Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319, 1687–168.Google Scholar

Dunn, E. W., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2011). If money doesn’t make you happy, then you probably aren’t spending it right. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 115–125.Google Scholar

Ersner-Hershfield, H., Garton, M.T., Ballard, K., Samanez-Larkin, G.R., & Knutson, B. (2009). Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow: Individual differences in future self-continuity account for saving. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 280–286.Google Scholar

Fiedler, K., Jung, J., Wänke, M., Alexopoulos, T. (2012). On the Relations between Distinct Aspects of Psychological Distance: An Ecological Basis of Construal-Level Theory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1014–1021.Google Scholar

Frederick, S., Novemsky, N., Wang, J., Dhar, R., & Nowlis, S. (2009). Opportunity cost neglect. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 553–561.Google Scholar

Fredrickson, B. L., & Kahneman, D. (1993). Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 45–55.Google Scholar

Fujita, K., & Roberts, J. C. (2010). Promoting prospective self-control through abstraction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1049–1054.Google Scholar

Fujita, K., Henderson, M., Eng, J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2006). Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psychological Science, 17, 278–282.Google Scholar

Garbinsky, E. N., Morewedge, C. K., & Shiv, B. (2014a). Interference of the end: Why recency bias in memory determines when a food is consumed again. Psychological Science, 25, 1466–1474.Google Scholar

Garbinsky, E. N., Morewedge, C. K., & Shiv, B. (2014b). Does liking or wanting determine repeat consumption delay? Appetite, 72, 59–65.Google Scholar

Gilbert, D. T., Morewedge, C. K., Risen, J. L., & Wilson, T. D. (2004). Looking forward to looking backward: The misprediction of regret. Psychological Science 15, 346–350.Google Scholar

Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2007). Prospection: Experiencing the future. Science, 317, 1351–1354.Google Scholar

Greene, J. (2013). Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap between Us and Them. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar

Haran, U., Moore, D. A., & Morewedge, C. K. (2010). A simple remedy for overprecision in judgment. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 467–476.Google Scholar

Henderson, M. D., Fujita, K., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2006). Transcending the “here”: The effect of spatial distance on social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 845–856.Google Scholar

Hershfield, H. E. (2011). Future self-continuity: How conceptions of the future self transform intertemporal choice. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235, 30–43.Google Scholar

Hershfield, H. E., Goldstein, D. G., Sharpe, W. F., Fox, J., Yeykelvis, L., Carstensen, L. L., & Bailenson, J. (2011). Increasing saving behavior through age-progressed renderings of the future self. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, S23–S27.Google Scholar

Hsee, C. K., & Hastie, R. (2006). Decision and experience: Why don’t we choose what makes us happy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 31–37.Google Scholar

Hsee, C. K., Hastie, R., & Chen, J. (2008). Hedonomics: Bridging decision research with happiness research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 224–243.Google Scholar

Hsee, C. K. & Zhang, J. (2004). Distinction bias: Misprediction and mischoice due to joint evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 680–695.Google Scholar

Hsee, C. K., Zhang, J., Cai, C. F., & Zhang, S. (2013). Overearning. Psychological Science, 24, 852–859.Google Scholar

Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 995–1006.Google Scholar

Iyengar, S. S., Wells, R. E., & Schwartz, B. (2006). Doing better but feeling worse: Looking for the “best” job undermines satisfaction. Psychological Science, 17, 143–150.Google Scholar

Jones, B., & Rachlin, H. (2006). Social discounting. Psychological Science, 17, 283–286.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwartz, N. (eds.), Well-being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (pp. 3–26). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B. L., Schreiber, C. A., & Redelmeier, D. A. (1993). When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psychological science, 4, 401–405.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Lovallo, D. (1993). Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Science, 39, 17–31.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Varey, C. A. (1990). Propensities and counterfactuals: The loser that almost won. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1101–1110.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., & Sarin, R. (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 375–405.Google Scholar

Keren, G., & Roelofsma, P. (1995). Immediacy and certainty in intertemporal choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 287–297.Google Scholar

Kivetz, R., Urminsky, O., & Zheng, Y. (2006). The goal-gradient hypothesis resurrected: Purchase acceleration, illusionary goal progress, and customer retention. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 39–58.Google Scholar

Kruger, J., & Burrus, J. (2004). Egocentrism and focalism in unrealistic optimism (and pessimism). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 332–40.Google Scholar

Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121–1134.Google Scholar

Kunreuther, H., Pauly, M. V., & McMorrow, S. (2013). Insurance and Behavioral Economics: Improving Decisions in the Most Misunderstood Industry. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ledgerwood, A., Wakslak, C. J., and Wang, M. A. (2010) Differential information use for near and distant decisions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 638–642.Google Scholar

Lerner, J. S., Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Heart strings and purse strings: Carryover effects of emotions on economic decisions. Psychological Science, 15, 337–341.Google Scholar

Liberman, N., Sagristano, M. D., & Trope, Y. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 523–534.Google Scholar

Liberman, N. & Trope, Y. (2014). Traversing psychological distance. Trends in Cognitive Science, 18, 364–369.Google Scholar

Liberman, N. & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal distance on level of construal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5–18Google Scholar

Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Halamish, V. (in preparation). A Proximity x Value Theory of Utility and Motivation. Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar

Liviatan, I., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others’ actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1256–1269.Google Scholar

Loewenstein, G. (1987). Anticipation and the valuation of delayed consumption. Economic Journal, 97, 666–684.Google Scholar

Loewenstein, G., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). The role of affect in decision making. In Davidson, R. J., Scherer, K. R., & Goldsmith, H. H. (eds.), Handbook of Affective Sciences (pp. 619–642). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Loewenstein, G. F., & Prelec, D. (1993). Preferences for sequences of outcomes. Psychological Review, 100, 91–108.Google Scholar

MacInnis, D. J., Patrick, V., and Park, C. W. (2006). Looking through the crystal ball: Affective forecasting and misforecasting in consumer behavior. Review of Marketing Research, 2, 43–80.Google Scholar

Maglio, S. & Hershfield, H.E. (2014). When Does the Future Start? Paper presented at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology Annual Conference, Austin, TX.Google Scholar

Mathieu, M.T. & Gosling, S.D. (2012). The accuracy or inaccuracy of affective forecasts depends on how accuracy is indexed: A meta-analysis of past studies. Psychological Science, 23, 161–162.Google Scholar

Maison, D., Greenwald, A. G., & Bruin, R. H. (2004). Predictive validity of the Implicit Association Test in studies of brands, consumer attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 405–415.Google Scholar

McClure, S. M., Laibson, D. I., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science, 306, 503–507.Google Scholar