Allot, P. Eunomia: New Order for a New World. Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Alvarez, J. E. International Organizations as Law-Makers. Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Alvarez, J. E. “The New Treaty Makers.” 25 Boston College International and Comparative Law (2002), 213–234.Google Scholar

Anderson, K. “The Ottawa Convention Banning Landmines, the Role of International Non-Governmental Organizations and the Idea of International Civil Society.” 11 EJIL (2000), 91–120.Google Scholar

Andresen, S., Skodvin, T., Underal, A., and Wettestad, J. Science and Politics in International Environmental Regimes: Between Integrity and Involvement. Manchester University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Antonakis, J. and House, R. J. “The Full-Range Leadership Theory: The Way Forward.” In Avolio, B. and Yammarino, F. (eds.), Transformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead. JAI, 2002, 3–34.Google Scholar

Aristotle. Metaphysics, vol. XVII (transl. by Tredennick, H.). Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, 1932.Google Scholar

Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics, vol. XIX (transl. by H. Rackham). Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, 1926 (reprinted 1999).Google Scholar

Aristotle Physics, vol. IV (transl. by P. H. Wicksteed and F. M. Cornford). Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Aristotle Politics, vol. XXI (transl. by Rackham, H.). Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, 1932 (reprinted 1998).Google Scholar

Aristotle Posterior Analytics, vol. II (transl. by Tredennick, H. and Forster, E. S.). Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Aust, A. Modern Treaty Law and Practice (3rd edn). Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Barriga, S. “Against the Odds: The Results of the Special Working Group on the Crime of Aggression.” In Bellelli, R. (ed.), International Criminal Justice: Law and Practice from the Rome Statute to Its Review. Ashgate Publishing, 2010, 621–643.Google Scholar

Barriga, S. “Introduction to the Negotiation History.” In Barriga, Stefan and Kress, Claus (eds.), The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression. Cambridge University Press, 2011, 1–98.Google Scholar

Benedick, R. E. “Perspectives of a Negotiation Practitioner.” In Sjosted, G. (ed.), International Environmental Negotiations. SAGE Publications, 1993, 219–243.Google Scholar

Blokker, N. and Kress, C. “A Consensus Agreement on the Crime of Aggression: Impressions from Kampala.” 23(4) LJIL (2010), 889–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown Weiss, E. “Strengthening National Compliance with International Environmental Agreements.” 27(4) Environmental Policy and Law (1997), 297–303.Google Scholar

Cardiner, R. Treaty Interpretation. The Oxford International Law Library. Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Cash, D. W., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N. M., Eckley, N., Guston, D. H., Jager, J., and Mitchell, R. B. “Knowledge Systems for Sustainable Development.” 100(14) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2003), 8086–8091.Google Scholar

Charney, J. I. “Technology and International Negotiations.” 76 AJIL (1982), 78–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chossudovsky, E. M. The Helsinki Final Act Viewed in the United Nations Perspective: Towards Strengthening the Continuity and Coherence of the Follow-Up to the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, UNITAR 1980, Research Report No. 24.Google Scholar

Churchill, R. R. and Ufstein, G. “Autonomous Institutional Arrangements in Multilateral Environmental Agreements: A Little-Noticed Phenomenon in International Law.” 94 AJIL (2000), 623–659.Google Scholar

Collingwood, V. “Non-Governmental Organisations, Power and Legitimacy in International Society.” 32 Review of International Studies (2006), 439–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Commission on Global Governance. Our Global Neighborhood. Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Cook, S. D. N. and Brown, J. S. “Bridging Epistemologies: The Generative Dance between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing.” 10(4) Organization Science(1999), 381–400. Edited version (2005). Available at: www.sagepub.com/upm-data/9926_039585Ch03.pdf.Google Scholar

Cooney, R. and Lang, A. “Taking Uncertainty Seriously: Adaptive Governance, Alien Invasive Species and the WTO.” 18 EJIL (2007), 523–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costa, A. et al. “Your Morals Depend on Language.” Plos One, 23 April 2014. Available at: www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0094842.Google Scholar

Crawford, J. “Responsibility for Breaches of Communitarian Norms: An Appraisal of Article 48 of the ILC Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts.” In Fastenrath, U., Geiger, R., Khan, D.-E., Paulus, A., von Schorlemer, S., and Vedder, C. (eds.), From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Judge Bruno Simma. Oxford University Press, 2011, 224. Doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588817.003.0017Google Scholar

Cross, J. “Negotiation as Adaptive Learning.” 1 International Negotiation (1996), 153–178.Google Scholar

David, A. E. The Strategy of Treaty Termination: Lawful Breaches and Retaliations. Yale University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

De Bono, E. Lateral Thinking: Creativity Step by Step. Harper & Row, 1970.Google Scholar

De Bono, E. Serious Creativity: Using the Power of Lateral Thinking to Create New Ideas. HarperBusiness, 1992.Google Scholar

De Burca, G. “The European Union in the Negotiation of the UN Disability Convention.” 35(2) European Law Review (2010), 174–196.Google Scholar

Dobelli, R. The Art of Thinking Clearly (transl. by Griffin, N.). Harper, 2013.Google Scholar

Dowdle, M. W. (ed.). Public Accountability: Design, Dilemmas and Experiences. Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Drury, J. L. et al. “Sympathetic Decisions: Incorporating Impacts on Others into Emergency Response Decision Spaces.” In Comes, T., Fiedrich, F., Fortier, S., Geldermann, J., and Müller, T. (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International ISCRAM Conference. Baden-Baden, Germany, May 2013, 199–209. Available at: www.iscramlive.org/ISCRAM2013/files/132.pdf.Google Scholar

Dworkin, R. M. “Is Law a System of Rules?” In Dworkin, R. M. (ed.), The Philosophy of Law. Oxford Readings in Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 1977, 38–65.Google Scholar

Edmonds, M. “Government Contracting and Renegotiation: A Comparative Analysis.” 50(1) Public Administration (1972), 45–64. Published online in April 2007. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467–9299.1972.tb00080.x/pdfGoogle Scholar

Fellmeth, A. X. and Horwitz, M. Guide to Latin in International Law. Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Fisher, R. and Ury, W., with Patton, B. (ed.). Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement without Giving In. Penguin Books. 1991.Google Scholar

Frei, D. Evolving a Conceptual Framework of Inter-Systems Relations: Elements for a Common Theoretical Approach to Cooperative Transactions in East–West Relationships. UNITAR 1980, Research Report No. 25.Google Scholar

Fuller, L. L. “The Forms and Limits of Adjudication.” 92 Harvard Law Review (1978–1979), 353–409.Google Scholar

Funtowicz, S. O. and Ravetz, J. R. “Global Risk, Uncertainty, and Ignorance.” In Kasperson, J. X. and Kasperson, R. E. (eds.), Global Environmental Risk. United Nations University Press, Earthscan, 2001, 73–94.Google Scholar

Galinksy, A. D. “When to Make the First Offer in Negotiations.” Available at: http://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/4302.html.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. and Gaissmaier, W. “Heuristic Decision Making.” 62 Annual Review of Psychology (2011), 451–482.Google Scholar

Goldman, A. and Rojot, J. Negotiation: Theory and Practice. Kluwer Law International, 2002.Google Scholar

Haas, P. Saving the Mediterranean: The Politics of International Environmental Cooperation, Columbia University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Haas, P. “Science Policy for Multilateral Environmental Governance.” In Kanie, N. and Haas, P. M. (eds.), Emerging Forces in Environmental Governance, United Nations University Press, 2004, 115–136.Google Scholar

Hall, D. L., Hellar, B., and McNeese, M. “Rethinking the Data Overload Problem: Closing the Gap between Situation Assessment and Decision Making.” In Proceedings of the 2007 National Symposium on Sensor and Data Fusion (NSSDF) Military Symposia (MSS), Mc Lean, VA, 2007.Google Scholar

Hall, N., Displacement, Development, and Climate Change: International Organizations Moving beyond Their Mandates, Global Institutions Series, Rutledge, 2016.Google Scholar

Kahn-Freund, O. Labour and the Law. Stevens & Sons, 1977.Google Scholar

Kelley, J. G. Scorecard Diplomacy. Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Keohane, R. “The Concept of Accountability in World Politics and the Use of Force.” 24 Michigan Journal of International Law (2003), 1121–1141.Google Scholar

Keysar, B., Hayakawa, S. L., and An, S. G. “The Foreign-Language Effect: Thinking in a Foreign Tongue Reduces Decision Biases.” 23 Psychological Science (2012), 661–668.Google Scholar

Kirton, M. J. Adaption-Innovation: In the Context of Diversity and Change. Routledge, 2003 (Repr. 2011).Google Scholar

Klabbers, J. “The EJIL Foreword: The Transformation of International Organizations Law.” 26 EJIL (2015), 9–82.Google Scholar

Koh, T. “A Constitution for the Oceans.” Remarks. Available at: www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/koh_english.pdf.Google Scholar

Koh, T. B. and Jayakumar, S. “The Negotiating Process of the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea.” In Nordquist, M. H. (ed.), United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982: A Commentary, vol. 1. Martinus Nijhoff, 1985, 29–134.Google Scholar

Koremenos, B. The Continent of International Law: Explaining Agreement Design. Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. “Constitutionalism as a Mindset: Reflections on Kantian Themes about International Law and Globalisation.” 8 Theoretical Inquiries in Law (2007), 9–36.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. “The Fate of Public International Law.” 70 MLR (2007), 1–30.Google Scholar

Kratochwil, F. The Status of Law in World Society: Meditations on the Role of the Rule of Law. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Kress, C. and von Holtzendorff, L. “The Kampala Compromise on the Crime of Aggression.” 8 Journal of International Criminal Justice (2010), 1179–1217.Google Scholar

Κuhn, T. S. “Dubbing and Redubbing: The Vulnerability of Rigid Designation.” In Savage, C. (ed.), Scientific Theory. University of Minnesota Press, 1990, 298–318.Google Scholar

Κuhn, T. S. The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. University of Chicago Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Κuhn, T. S. “Objectivity, Value Judgment and Theory Choice.” In The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. University of Chicago Press, 1977, 320–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinson, S. C. Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Lichtenberg, G. C. “Waste Books” (Sudelbϋcher) (translation, with an introduction by Hollingdale, R. J.). NYBR Classics, 2000.Google Scholar

Llewellyn, Κ. Ν. “What Price Contract? An Essay in Perspective.” 40 Yale Law Journal (1931), 704–751.Google Scholar

MacNeil, I. R. The New Social Contract: An Inquiry into Modern Contractual Relations. Yale University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Majone, G. “Science and Tran-Science in Standard Setting.” 9 Science Technology and Human Values Journal (1984), 15–22.Google Scholar

Martineau, A.-C. “The Rhetoric of Fragmentation: Fear and Faith in International Law.” 22 LJIL (2009), 1–19.Google Scholar

Matthews, J. T. “Power Shift.” 76(1) Foreign Affairs (1997), 56–66. Also available at: www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/52644/jessica-t-mathews/power-shift.Google Scholar

Maslow, A. H. The Farther Reaches of Human Nature, Viking Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Maslow, A. H. Motivation and Personality. Harper, 1954.Google Scholar

McConnell, M. L. “The Relationship between Science and Politics in Environmental Negotiations.” In Raftopoulos, E. and McConnell, M. L. (eds.), Contributions to International Environmental Negotiation in the Mediterranean Context. MEPIELAN Studies in International Environmental Law and Negotiation-2, Nomiki Bibliothiki SA – Bruylant, 2014 (Repr. first edn, 2004) Part IΙ, 81–92.Google Scholar

McDougal, M. and Reisman, W. M. “The Prescribing Function in World Constitutive Process: How International Law Is Made” (1980). Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 2661. Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2661.Google Scholar

McGann, J. and Johnstone, M. “The Power Shift and the NGO Credibility Crisis.” 11 Brown Journal of World Affairs (2005), 159–171.Google Scholar

Merrills, J. G. International Dispute Settlement (3rd edn). Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Meyer, M. “The Rise of the Knowledge Broker.” 32(1) Science Communication (2010)SAGE Publications, 118–127. Available at: http://scx.sagepub.com/content/32/1/118.Google Scholar

Michels, R. Political Parties. Free Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Minsky, M. “A Framework for Representing Knowledge.” In Winston, P. H. (ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision. McGraw-Hill, 1975, 211–281. Also available at: http://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Frames/frames.html.Google Scholar

Monk, R. Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius. Vintage, 1991.Google Scholar

Narlikar, A. (ed.), Deadlocks in Multilateral Negotiations: Causes and Solutions, Introduction. Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

O’Neill, K. The Environment and International Relations (2nd edn). Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Oldham, G. and McLean, R. “Approaches to Knowledge-Brokering.” 1997. Available at: www.iisd.org/pdf/2001/networks_knowledge_brokering.pdf.Google Scholar

Oppenheim, L. (ed.), The Collected Papers of John Westlake on Public International Law. Cambridge University Press, 1914 (paperback edn, 2014).Google Scholar

Osborn, A. F. Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking. Scribner, 1953.Google Scholar

Parry, C. The Sources and Evidences of International Law. Manchester University Press-Oceana Publications Inc., 1965.Google Scholar

Parry, C. “Of Treaties.” In Parry, A. (ed.), Collected Papers of Clive Parry, vol. II. Wildy, Simmonds and Hill Publishing, 2012, 289–307.Google Scholar

Patton, B. “On Teaching Negotiation.” In Wheeler, M. (ed.), Teaching Negotiation: Ideas and Innovations. PON Books, 2000, 7–61.Google Scholar

Peters, A. “Universalist Assumptions and Implications of Comparative Law: Should They Be Deconstructed?” In Proceedings of the 93rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law, 1999, 366–369.Google Scholar

Peters, B. G. and Pierre, J. Comparative Governance: Rediscovering the Functional Dimension of Governing. Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Polanyi, M. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. University of Chicago Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Pollux, . “The Interpretation of the Charter.” 23 BYBIL (1946), 54–82.Google Scholar

Pollux, Program on Negotiation Harvard Law School. “About the Harvard Negotiation Project.” 19 April, 2009. Available at: www.pon.harvard.edu/research_projects/harvard-negotiation-project/hnp/.Google Scholar

Pound, R. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law. Yale University Press, 1954.Google Scholar

Raftopoulos, Ε. Barcelona Convention and Protocols: The Mediterranean Action Plan Regime. Simmonds & Hill Publishing Ltd., 1993.Google Scholar

Raftopoulos, Ε. Conventional Environmental Governance and the Mediterranean or PLUS ULTRA (In Greek). Nomiki Bibliothiki SA, 2014 (Repr. first edn, 2006).Google Scholar

Raftopoulos, Ε. “Conventional Environmental Governance in the Mediterranean and Its Evolving Institutional and Fiduciary Aspects in a Pragmatic Perspective.” 30 Ocean Yearbook (2016), 129–173.Google Scholar

Raftopoulos, Ε. Course, Theory and Language of International Law: “Objectivity” or International Common Interest?” (In Greek). Nomiki Bibliothiki SA, 2014 (Repr. first edn, 1997).Google Scholar

Raftopoulos, Ε. The Inadequacy of the Contractual Analogy in the Law of Treaties. Publications of the Hellenic Institute of International and Foreign Law. Athens, 1990.Google Scholar

Raftopoulos, Ε.“International Environmental Negotiation as a Governance Technique.” In Raftopoulos, E. and McConnell, M. L. (eds.), Contributions to International Environmental Negotiation in the Mediterranean Context. MEPIELAN Studies in International Environmental Law and Negotiation-2. Nomiki Bibliothiki SA – Bruylant, 2014 (Repr. first edn, 2004) Part I, 3–64.Google Scholar

Raftopoulos, Ε.“Theorizing about Conventional Environmental Sea-Regimes as International Trusts: The Case of the Barcelona Convention System.” In Wolfrum, R., Seršić, M., and Šošić, T. M. (eds.), Contemporary Developments in International Law: Essays in Honour of Budislav Vukas. Brill-Nijhoff, 2015, Part 2, Law of the Sea, 263–290.Google Scholar

Raiffa, H. The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Rajamani, L. “The Cancun Climate Agreements: Reading the Text, Subtext and Tea Leaves.” 60 ICLQ (2011), 499–519.Google Scholar

Renton Commission. Τhe Preparation of Legislation. Report of the Renton Commission, London, Cmnd. 6053, 1973.Google Scholar

Riles, A. “Models and Documents: Artifacts of International Legal Knowledge.” 48 ICLQ (1999), 805–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roucounas, E. “Facteurs Privès et Droit International Public.” 299 Recueil des Cours de l’ Académie de Droit International de la Haye (2002), 1–419.Google Scholar

Rovelli, C. Reality Is Not What It Seems: The Journey to Quantum Gravity (transl. by S. Carnell and E. Serge). Allen Lane-Penguin Random House UK, 2016.Google Scholar

Rowold, J. “Instrumental Leadership: Extending the Transformational-Transactional Leadership Paradigm. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung.” 28(3) German Journal of Research in Human Resource Management (2014), 367–390.Google Scholar

Sand, P. “Sovereignty Bounded: Public Trusteeship for Common Pool Resources?” 4(1) Global Environmental Politics (2004), 47–71.Google Scholar

Schwarz, M. and Sonin, K. “A Theory of Brinkmanship, Conflicts, and Commitments.” 24(1) Journal of Law, Economics & Organization (2008), 163–183.Google Scholar

Scott, B. The Skills of Negotiating. Wildwood House, 1986.Google Scholar

Sebenius, J. K. “International Negotiation Analysis.” In Kremenyuk, V. A. (ed.), International Negotiation: Analysis, Approaches, Issues (2nd edn). Jossey-Bass – A Wiley Company, 2002, 229–255.Google Scholar

Sebenius, J. K. “Negotiation Arithmetic: Adding and Subtracting Issues and Parties.” 37 International Organization (1983), 292–298.Google Scholar

Sjostedt, G. “Negotiation on Trade and the Environment: Variation in the Multilateral Approach.” In Kremenyuk, V. A. (ed.), International Negotiation: Analysis, Approaches, Issues (2nd edn). Jossey-Bass – A Wiley Company, 2002, 362–374.Google Scholar

Smith, T. H. “Metaphors for Navigating Negotiations.” 21(3) Negotiation Journal (2005), 343–364.Google Scholar

Sohn, L. B. “United National Decision-Making: Confrontation or Consensus?” 1 Harvard International Law Journal (1974), 438–445.Google Scholar

Spector, B. I. Negotiation as Learning: Pedagogy and Theory. A paper in Honor of Bill Zartman. Presented at the Annual Conference of the International Studies Association, March 2, 2007, Chicago.Google Scholar

Starkey, B., Boyer, M. A., and Wilkenfeld, J. International Negotiation in a Complex World. Rowman & Littlefield, 2015.Google Scholar

Steinman, B. A., Mann, M. E., and Miller, S. K. “Atlantic and Pacific Multidecadal Oscillations and Northern Hemisphere Temperatures.” 347(6225) Science (2015).Google Scholar

Susskind, L. E. Environmental Diplomacy: Negotiating More Effective Global Agreements. Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Trebilcock, A. “Labour Resources and Human Resources Management.” In ILO Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety (4th edn), Part III, Chapter 21. Available at: www.ilocis.org/documents/chpt21e.htm.Google Scholar

Tribe, L. H. “The Curvature of Constitutional Space: What Lawyers Can Learn from Modern Physics.” 103 Harvard Law Review (1989), 1–39.Google Scholar

Triepel, H. Völkerrecht und Landesrecht, Leipzig, 1899/Droit International et Droit Interne (transl. by René Brunet). Bibliothèque Française de Droit des Gens de la Fondation Carnegie, 1920.Google Scholar

Twining, W. and Miers, D. How to Do Things with Rules (5th edn). Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

UNESCO. The Future of Scientific Advice to the United Nations: A Summary Report to the Secretary-General of the United Nations from the Scientific Advisory Board, September 2016, 1–32.Google Scholar

Viñuales, J. “The Paris Climate Agreement: Less Is More.” 59 GYIL (2017), 11–45.Google Scholar

Waldron, J. “Legislators’ Intentions and Unintentional Legislation.” In Marmor, E. (ed.), Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal Philosophy. Clarendon Press, 1997, 329–357.Google Scholar

Walton, R. E. and McKersie, R. B. A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations: An Analysis of a Social Interaction System. McGraw-Hill, 1965.Google Scholar

Webber, G. C. N. The Negotiable Constitution: On the Limitation of Rights. Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Wenaweser, C. “Reaching the Kampala Compromise on Aggression: The Chair’s Perspective.” 23(4) LJIL (2010), 883–887.Google Scholar

Wendt, A. Quantum Mind and Social Science: Unifying Physical and Social Ontology. Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Whorf, B. L. “Language, Mind and Reality.” In Carroll, J. B. (ed.), Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. MIT Press, 1956.Google Scholar

Widdows, K. “The Unilateral Denunciation of Treaties Containing Νο Denunciation Clause.” 53 BYBIL (1982), 83–114.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical Investigations (transl. by G. E. M. Anscombe). Basil Blackwell, 1976.Google Scholar

Woodward, B. Plan of Attack. Wheeler Large Print Book Series, 2004.Google Scholar

Young, O. Protecting the Environment in a Stateless Society. Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Zartman, I. W. and Berman, M. R. The Practical Negotiator. Yale University Press, 1982.Google Scholar