Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-14T13:10:24.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 18 - Discourse Studies in Korean

from Part IV - Semantics and Pragmatics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2022

By
Haeyeon Kim
Edited by
Sungdai Cho  and
John Whitman
Sungdai Cho
Affiliation:
Binghamton University, State University of New York
John Whitman
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

Chapter 18 surveys research over the last few decades on discourse analysis in Korean linguistics. Since the 1980s, a number of Korean linguists have explored the relationship between discourse and grammar, dealing with topics such as information flow, choice of NPs in discourse, word order variability, case markers, pragmatic functions of clausal connectives and sentence-enders, grammaticalization, cohesion and coherence, and text structures. In the 1990s and 2000s, discourse analysts have explored the relationship between conversation, social action, and grammar, introducing the assumptions and methodology of conversational analysis into discourse analysis. The chapter provides a brief overview of major findings and research topics in analyses of conversational data in Korean linguistics in terms of (i) turn-taking, turn-constructional units, and turn increments, (ii) interactional functions of some clausal connectives and sentence-ending suffixes, and (iii) other interaction-based studies of topics such as repair, demonstratives, and reported speech. It also discusses discourse studies carried out from the perspectives of sociolinguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA).

Keywords

discourse studies in Koreandiscourse and grammarinformation flowcohesion and coherenceConversation Analysisconversation and grammarsocial interactionCritical Discourse Analysis (CDA)textlinguistics
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Korean Linguistics , pp. 524 - 553
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahn, Jeong-kun. 1995. Red flag expressions in advertisements [In Korean]. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 3(2): 101–22.Google Scholar
Akatsuka, Noriko, and Sohn, Sung-Ock. 1994. Negative conditionality: The case of Japanese -tewa and Korean -taka. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 4: 203–21.Google Scholar
Atkinson, John M., and Heritage, John, eds. 1984. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Connor, Ulla, and Upton, Thomas A.. 2007. Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace, ed. 1980. The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1987. Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Tomlin, Russell, ed., Coherence and Grounding in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 21–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chang, In-Bong. 2011. Discours direct dans le texte journalistique [An analysis of direct quotations in journalistic texts]. Rhetoric 14: 61–100.Google Scholar
de Beaugrande, Robert and Dressler, Wolfgang. 1981. Introduction to Textlinguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John. 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63(4): 805–55.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John, Kumpf, Lorraine E., and Ashby, William J., eds. 2003. Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as Architecture for Function. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Du Bois, J., Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan, Cumming, Susanna, and Paolino, Danae. 1993. Outline of discourse transcription. In Edwards, Jane A. and Lampert, Martin D., eds., Talking Data: Transcription and Coding Methods for Language Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 221–60.Google Scholar
Edwards, Jane A., and Lampert, Martin D., eds. 1993. Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne, and Slade, Diana. 1997. Analyzing Casual Conversation. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Isabela, and Fairclough, Norman. 2013. Political Discourse: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1995a. Media Discourse. London: Edward ArnoldGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1995b. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Boston: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2014. Critical Language Awareness. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia. 1993. Grammar in Interaction: Adverbial Clauses in American English Conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1996. Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the projection of turn completion. In Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel, and Thompson, Sandra A., eds., Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 135–84.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia, Fox, Barbara A., and Thompson, Sandra A.. 2002. Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In Ford, Cecilia, Fox, Barbara A., and Thompson, Sandra A., eds., The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 14–38.Google Scholar
Gee, James P., and Handford, Michael, eds. 2012. The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy, ed. 1983. Topic Continuity in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1985/1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., and Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig. S. 1952. Discourse analysis. Language 28: 1–30.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike, and Friederike, Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1993/2003. Grammaticalization (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics) 1st/2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hwang, Myong Ok. 1983. Topic continuity/discontinuity in Korean narrative. Korean Linguistics 3: 47–79.Google Scholar
Hwang, Myong Ok. 1986. Deixis in discourse: The choice of demonstratives in Korean written discourse. Korean Linguistics 4: 75–104.Google Scholar
Hwang, Shin Ja J. 1980. The referential structure of a Korean folktale: The story of Shim Chung. Language Research 16: 255–80.Google Scholar
Hwang, Shin Ja J. 1987. Discourse Features of Korean Narration. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hwang, Shin Ja J. 2015. Korean discourse structure. In Brown, Lucien and Yeon, Jaehoon, eds., The Handbook of Korean Linguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 287–302.Google Scholar
Hwang, Shin Ja J. 2016. Hankwuk Selhwauy Tamhwa Pwunsek [Discourse Analysis of Korean Folktales]. Seoul: Cipmwuntang.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, and Coupland, Nikolas. 1999. The Discourse Reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jeon, Seongki. 2005. Free indirect speech in Korean. French Language Education 20: 243–77.Google Scholar
Jeong, Yeo-hoon. 2006. Sinmwun ceymokuy ywuhyeng mith ku silhyen yangsang [A study of types of newspaper headlines and their realization]. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 14(1): 85–114.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2002. Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kawanishi, Yumiko. 1994a. An analysis of non-challengeable modals: Korean -canha(yo) and Japanese -janai. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 4: 95–111.Google Scholar
Kawanishi, Yumiko. 1994b. An analysis of interactional markers in Korean: A comparative study of -canh-a(yo) vs. -ci(yo). In Iwasaki, Shoichi, Ono, Tsuyoshi, Tao, Hongyin, and Lee, Hyo Sang, eds., Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 5 (East Asian Linguistics). Santa Barbara: Department of Linguistics, UCSB, pp. 82–100.Google Scholar
Kawanishi, Yumiko, and Sohn, Sung-Ock. 1993. The grammaticalization of Korean negation: A semantic-pragmatic analysis of -canh-. Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics V. Seoul: Hanshin, pp. 552–61.Google Scholar
Kim, Haeyeon. 1988. A discourse analysis of the conjunctive morpheme -nuntey in Korean spoken narratives. In Baek, Eung-jin, ed., Papers from the Sixth International Conference on Korean Linguistics. Seoul: Hanshin, pp. 189–94.Google Scholar
Kim, Haeyeon. 1989. Nominals in discourse: The introduction of referents and referent-tracking in Korean spoken narratives. Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics III. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co., pp. 431–44.Google Scholar
Kim, Haeyeon. 1990. Continuity of action and topic in discourse. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 1: 79–96.Google Scholar
Kim, Haeyeon. 1992. Clause combining in discourse and grammar: An analysis of some Korean clausal connectives in discourse. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii, Manoa.Google Scholar
Kim, Haeyeon. 1996. Functions of the verbal affix -nuntey in Korean conversation. Language Research 32(4): 637–63.Google Scholar
Kim, Haeyeon. 1997. Turn-taking and verbal affixes in Korean conversation. Language Research 33(4): 601–27.Google Scholar
Kim, Haeyeon. 2002a. Collaborative turn completion in Korean conversation. Language Research 38(4): 1281–316.Google Scholar
Kim, Haeyeon. 2002b. Co-construction as an interactional achievement in Korean conversation. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 10(2): 181–211.Google Scholar
Kim, Haeyeon. 2003a. Functions of post-posed adverbial clauses in Korean conversation. Language Research 39(4): 911–32.Google Scholar
Kim, Haeyeon. 2003b. NP turn extension in Korean conversation. Ene (Korean Journal of Linguistics) 28(4): 585–605.Google Scholar
Kim, Haeyeon. 2004. Backchannels as achievements of social interaction in Korean conversation. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 12(1): 65–93.Google Scholar
Kim, Haeyeon. 2005. An overview of studies of conversation in Korean linguistics. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 13(2): 89–126.Google Scholar
Kim, Haeyeon. 2006. Conversation and grammar: A conversation-analytic approach to Korean conversation. Korean Linguistics 13: 235–61.Google Scholar
Kim, Haeyeon. 2008. Turn extensions as turn-constructional practice: Word order variability in Korean conversation. In Hudson, Mutsuko Endo, Sells, Peter, and Jun, Sun-Ah, eds., Japanese/Korean Linguistics 13. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 397–408.Google Scholar
Kim, Haeyeon. 2017. An analysis of reporting constructions in newspaper report texts. Textlinguistics 42: 1–30.Google Scholar
Kim, Hye-Sook. 1999. Sociolinguistic characteristics of linguistic expressions in advertisements. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 7(2): 261–86.Google Scholar
Kim, Jeongeun. 2004. Kwangkoeneey nathanan hyentayinuy uysikmunhwa [Koreans’ attitudes toward advertisement expressions]. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 12(1): 37–64.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun. 1990. The Korean topic marker and subject marker: Speaker-relevant focus and event-relevant focus. In Baek, Eung-jin, ed., Papers from the Seventh International Conference on Korean Linguistics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 186–202.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun. 1993a. Topicality in Korean conversation: Conversation analytic perspective. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 2: 33–54.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun. 1993b. Other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation as interactional resources. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 3: 3–18.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun. 1999a. Other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation: Types and functions. Discourse and Cognition 6(2): 141–68.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun. 1999b. Organization of classroom discourse: A conversation-analytic perspective. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 7(2): 159–88.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun. 1999c. Phrasal unit boundaries and organization of turns and sequences in Korean conversation. Human Studies 22: 425–46.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun. 2000. An analysis of Korean topic constructions in story-telling contexts with reference to English left-dislocation. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 8(1): 139–66.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun. 2001a. The Korean topic marker nun as a tying device: Grounding referents and actions. Discourse and Cognition 8(1): 139–60.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun. 2001b. Turn-constructional practice in Korean conversation: Organization of turn increments. Language Research 37(4): 885–922.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun. 2001c. Confirming intersubjectivity through retroactive elaboration: Organization of phrasal units in other-initiated repair sequences in Korean conversation. In Selting, Margret and Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, eds., Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 345–72.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun. 2002. Interactive classroom discourse as context of learning and socialization. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 10(2): 213–41.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun. 2003. An analysis of collaborative completion in Korean conversation. Language Research 39(1): 147–82.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun. 2004. A conversation analysis of Korean sentence-final modal suffixes -ney, kwun(a), and -ta: Noticing as a social action. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 12(1): 1–35.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun. 2007. The Korean topic marker nun revisited: nun as a tying device. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 15: 81–92.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun, and Suh, Kyung-Hee. 1994a. The discourse connective -nikka in Korean conversation. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 4: 113–29.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun, and Suh, Kyung-Hee. 1994b. An interactional account of -nikka in Korean conversation. In Iwasaki, Shoichi, Ono, Tsuyoshi, Tao, Hongyin, and Lee, Hyo Sang, eds., Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 5 (East Asian Linguistics). Santa Barbara: Department of Linguistics, UCSB, pp. 101–22.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun, and Suh, Kyung-Hee. 1996. Dealing with prior talk: Discourse connectives in Korean conversation. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 5: 83–100.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun, and Suh, Kyung-Hee. 2002. Demonstratives as prospective indexicals: ku and ce in Korean conversation. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 10: 192–205.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyu-hyun, and Suh, Kyung-Hee. 2004. An analysis of Korean sentence-ending suffixes in caregiver-child interaction. Language Research 40(4): 923–50.Google Scholar
Kim, Mary Shin. 2003. Reported speech as an interactive resource: An examination of Korean quotative constructions. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 12: 3–15.Google Scholar
Kim, Mary Shin. 2011. The functional polysemy of the Korean discourse marker mak: Variant functions under an invariant meaning. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 18: 31–42.Google Scholar
Kim, Mary Shin, and Kim, Jieun. 2013. The Korean adverb kunyang in spoken discourse. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 20: 17–30.Google Scholar
Kim, Stephanie Hyeri, and Kim, Kyu-hyun. 2015. Conversation analysis. In Brown, Lucien and Yeon, Jaehoon, eds., The Handbook of Korean Linguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 271–86.Google Scholar
Kim, Yong-Jin. 1999. A comparative study of Korean and American newspaper editorial texts: Focusing on “evidentiality” expressions. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 7(1): 119–50.Google Scholar
Kim, Yong-Jin. 2003. A sociolinguistic analysis of newspaper editorial titles. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 11(1): 341–54.Google Scholar
Kwon, Woojin. 2002. Sinmun phyoceyeey tayhan sahoyenehakcek yenkwu [A sociolinguistic study of newspaper titles]. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 10(2): 25–58.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Hyo Sang. 1987. Discourse Presupposition and the Discourse Function of the Topic Marker nun in Korean. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Lee, Hyo Sang. 1991. Tense, aspect, and modality: A discourse-pragmatic analysis of verbal affixes in Korean from a typological perspective. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Lee, Hyo Sang. 1993. Cognitive constraints on expressing newly perceived information, with reference to epistemic modal suffixes in Korean. Cognitive Linguistics 4(2): 135–67.Google Scholar
Lee, Hyo Sang. 1999a. A discourse-pragmatic analysis of the committal -ci in Korean: A synthetic approach to the form-meaning relation. Journal of Pragmatics 20: 327–58.Google Scholar
Lee, Hyo Sang. 1999b. Discourse-pragmatics of the Korean connective -nunte/(u)nte: A case of grammaticalization of figure-ground relation. Paper presented at New Reflections on Grammaticalization 1, June 16–19, Potsdam, Germany.Google Scholar
Lee, Hyo Sang. 2003. Grammaticalization and synchronic variation: A unified account of the discourse-pragmatics of -na in Korean. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 12: 149–62.Google Scholar
Lee, Hyo Sang. 2015a. Tense and aspect. In Brown, Lucien and Yeon, Jaehoon, eds., The Handbook of Korean Linguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 232–48.Google Scholar
Lee, Hyo Sang. 2015b. Modality. In Brown, Lucien and Yeon, Jaehoon, eds., The Handbook of Korean Linguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 249–68.Google Scholar
Lee, Hyo Sang, and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1989. A discourse account of the Korean accusative marker. Studies in Language 13(1): 105–28.Google Scholar
Lee, Keedong. 1993. A Korean Grammar on Semantic-Pragmatic Principles. Seoul: Hankook munhwasa.Google Scholar
Lee, Kee-Gap. 1995. Hankwukeuy tamhwa phyoci “icey” [The Korean discourse marker “icey”]. Discourse and Cognition 1: 261–87.Google Scholar
Lee, Won-Pyo. 1992. Sikan pusa “icey”uy tamhwa kinung [Discourse functions of the temporal adverb “icey”]. Human Sciences 68: 105–37. Seoul: Research Center for Human Sciences, Yonsei University.Google Scholar
Lee, Won-Pyo. 1993. Uyci kamthansa “yey”, “kulssey”, “ani”uy tamhwa punsek [A discourse analytic study of the intention exclamatory markers “yes”, “well”, and “no”]. Human Sciences 68: 105–37. Seoul: Research Center for Human Sciences, Yonsei University.Google Scholar
Lee, Won-Pyo. 1994. Sanghokyolyueyse munpephwalo: Swusacek phyohyen “waynyamyen” kwumunuy kyengwulul cwungsimulo [From interaction to grammaticalization: Focusing on the rhetorical expression waynyamyen]. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 2: 21–54.Google Scholar
Lee, Won-Pyo. 1995. A discourse marker: “mweya” in Korean. Linguistics in the Morning Calm 3 (Selected papers from SICOL-1992). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co., pp. 725–39.Google Scholar
Lee, Won-Pyo. 1998. Hanpo chengmunhoyeyseuy cilmun punsek: Ceyto sanghwangkwa hwacauy thayto phyohyen [An analysis of the interrogation in the Hanbo hearings: Institutional settings and representation of stance]. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 6(1): 1–52.Google Scholar
Lee, Won-Pyo. 1999. Thokhusyoeyseuy mal kkie tulki: Tamhwa kinungkwa sahoycek yoin [Interventions in talk shows: Discourse functions and social variables]. Discourse and Cognition 6(2): 23–60.Google Scholar
Lee, Won-Pyo. 2005a. Sinmun saseleyseuy phyohyeney tayhan enehakcek punsek: Kwukkapoanpep phyeyciey tayhan noncaynguy kyengwu [A linguistic analysis of representation of ideologies in newspaper editorials: The case of controversy on abolition of the ‘national security laws’]. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 13(1): 191–228.Google Scholar
Lee, Won-Pyo. 2005b. Direct quotations in newspaper editorials: An analysis from the perspective of Bakhtin’s dialogicality. Discourse and Cognition 12(2): 117–51.Google Scholar
Li, Charles, and Thompson, Sandra A.. 1976. Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In Li, Charles N., ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press, pp. 457–89.Google Scholar
Longacre, Robert. 1985/1996. The Grammar of Discourse, 1st/2nd ed. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Thompson, Sandra A., eds. 1996. Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Park, Mee-Jeong, and Sohn, Sung-Ock S.. 2002. Discourse, grammaticalization, and intonation: An analysis of -ketun in Korean. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 10: 306–19.Google Scholar
Park, Yong-Yae. 1996. The Korean connective nuntey in conversational discourse. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 5: 131–48.Google Scholar
Park, Yong-Yae. 1997. A cross-linguistic study of the use of contrastive connectives in English, Korean, and Japanese conversation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Park, Yong-Yae. 1998. Interactive grammar: The turn-final use of nuntey in Korean and kedo in Japanese. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 8: 45–60.Google Scholar
Park, Yong-Yae. 1999. The Korean connective nuntey in conversational discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 191–218.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel, and Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50(4): 696–735.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. A., Jefferson, Gail, and Sacks, Harvey. 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53(2): 361–82.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1994. Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah, Tannen, Deborah, and Hamilton, Heidi. 2001. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret, and Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, eds. 2001. Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sohn, Sung-Ock. 1992. Speaker-oriented and event-oriented causal: A comparative analysis of -nikka and -ese. Korean Linguistics 7: 83–93.Google Scholar
Sohn, Sung-Ock. 1994. Semantic change and restructuring in modern Korean: A case of semi-grammaticalization. In Iwasaki, Shoichi, Ono, Tsuyoshi, Tao, Hongyin, and Lee, Hyo Sang, eds., Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 5 (East Asian Linguistics). Santa Barbara: Department of Linguistics, UCSB, pp. 193–204.Google Scholar
Sohn, Sung-Ock. 2003. On the emergence of intersubjectivity: An analysis of the sentence-final -nikka in Korean. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 12: 52–63.Google Scholar
Sohn, Sung-Ock, and Park, Mee-jeong. 2003. Indirect quotations in Korean conversations. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 11: 105–18.Google Scholar
Song, Kyong-Sook. 1993. An Interactional Sociolinguistic Analysis of Argument Strategies in Korean Conversational Discourse: Negotiating Disagreement and Conflict. Ph.D. dissertation, Georgetown University, Georgetown.Google Scholar
Song, Kyong-Sook. 1994. An interactional sociolinguistic approach to discourse analysis: A case of conflict management strategies in English and Korean. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 2: 99–128.Google Scholar
Song, Kyong-Sook. 1995. Semantics and pragmatics of argument in Korean conversational discourse: A journey to sociolinguistics. Korean Journal of Linguistics 20(2): 49–78.Google Scholar
Song, Kyong-Sook. 1998. Cey 15tay taythonglyeng hwupo chocheng TV haptong tholonhoy punsek [An analysis of the 15th Korean presidential candidates’ live TV debates]. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 6(1): 53–87.Google Scholar
Strauss, Susan, and Ahn, Kyungja. 2007. Cognition through the lens of discourse and interaction: The case of -kwun, -ney, and -tela. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 15: 135–46.Google Scholar
Suh, Jeong-soo. 1996. Hyentay kwuke munpeplon [Contemporary Korean Grammar]. Seoul: Hanyang University Press.Google Scholar
Suh, Kyung-Hee. 2001. Language socialization through sentence-ending modal particles -ci and -cianha in Korean care-giver interaction. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 9(1): 237–58.Google Scholar
Suh, Kyung-Hee. 2003. From unknown to unspeakable: “Mwe” as a stance marker in Korean conversation. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 11(2): 137–60.Google Scholar
Suh, Kyung-Hee. 2004. Interactional functions of way in Korean conversation. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 12(2): 181–204.Google Scholar
Suh, Kyung-Hee, and Hong, Jong-Hwa. 1999. “Ikey palo kukeya”: Wenkun cisieyse thayto cisilo [“This is it”: From spatial to speaker-stance deixis]. Discourse and Cognition 6(2): 1–22.Google Scholar
Suh, Kyung-Hee, and Kim, Kyu-hyun. 1991. The Korean modal markers keyss and (u)lkes: An interactional perspective. Harvard Studies on Korean Linguistics IV: 599–610. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Suh, Kyung-Hee, and Kim, Kyu-hyun. 1993. The Korean modal marker keyss as a marker of affect: An interactional perspective. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 2: 98–114.Google Scholar
Suh, Kyung-Hee, and Kim, Kyu-hyun. 1995. “Keyss” kwumunuy tayhan punsek [A conversation analysis of the Korean keyss utterances]. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 3(1): 35–54.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C., and König, Ekkerhard. 1991. The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Heine, Bernd, eds., Approaches to Grammaticalization, vol. I. Theoretical and Methodological Issues (Typological Studies in Language). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 189–218.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun, ed. 1985. Handbook of Discourse Analysis. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Elizabeth. 1993. Varieties of Questions in English Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×