“Expletive” Negation in Korean

doi:10.1017/9781108292351.022

Chapter 21 - “Expletive” Negation in Korean

from Part IV - Semantics and Pragmatics

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 September 2022

Suwon Yoon

Edited by

Sungdai Cho and

John Whitman

Show author details

Sungdai Cho: Affiliation:
Binghamton University, State University of New York
John Whitman: Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Chapter 21 provides a unified analysis of the phenomena known as expletive negation (EN), focusing on Korean data. Contrary to the traditional term “expletive negation”, the chapter proposes that the particular type of negation in a variety of contexts has semantic content that can be analyzed on two dimensions: (i) in terms of licensing, there is a crucial semantic dependency on nonveridicality, involving, e.g., polarity items; (ii) in terms of semantico-pragmatic factors, the crucial and evaluative sense of undesirability or unlikelihood, comparable to uses of subjunctive mood in some languages. The chapter shows that expletive negation in Korean (and Japanese) occurs in typical subjunctive contexts such as polite requests, emphatic sentences, dubitatives, and also shows how the nonveridical semantics of the predicates that select EN can be represented. It proposes that these evaluative contents of EN, modifying the whole utterance, can be captured by the conventional implicature (CI) logic in the sense of Potts (2005). This has the important implication that various subspecies of EN in language are indeed part of grammar.

Keywords

expletive negation evaluative negation subjunctive mood nonveridicality polarity expressives cross-linguistic variation

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Korean Linguistics , pp. 607 - 634

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108292351.022 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abels, K. 2002. Expletive (?) negation. In Bloomington, J. T., ed., Proceedings of FASL 10. Michigan: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar

Abels, K. 2005. “Expletive negation” in Russian: A conspiracy theory. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 13: 5–74.Google Scholar

Brown, S. 1999. The Syntax of Negation in Russian: A Minimalist Approach. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Brown, S., and Franks, S.. 1995. Asymmetries in the scope of Russian Negation. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 3: 239–87.Google Scholar

Cruse, D. A. 1986. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Donati, C. 2000. A note on negation in comparison. Quaderni del Dipartimento di Linguistica – Università di Firenze 10: 55–68.Google Scholar

Eilam, A., and Scheffler, T.. 2006. Until and Expletive negation in Modern Hebrew. Swarthmore Workshop on Negation and Polarity, April 14–15.Google Scholar

Ernst, T. 2009. Speaker-oriented adverbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27(3): 497–544.CrossRef Google Scholar

Espinal, M. T. 1997. Non-negative negation and wh-exclamatives. In Forget, D., Hirschbühler, P., Martineau, F., and Rivero, M. L., eds., Negation and Polarity. Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 75–93.Google Scholar

Espinal, M. T. 2000. Expletive negation, negative concord and feature checking. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 8: 47–69.Google Scholar

Farkas, D. F. 1992a. On the semantics of subjunctive complements. In Hirschbűhler, P. et al., eds., Romance Languages and Modern Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 69–104.CrossRef Google Scholar

Farkas, D. F. 1992b. Mood choice in complement clauses. In Kenesei, I. and Pleh, E., eds., Approaches to Hungarian, vol. 4: The Structure of Hungarian. Szeged: JATE, pp. 77–103.Google Scholar

Fischer, O. 1992. Syntax. In Blake, N., eds., The Cambridge History of the English Language II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1066–476.Google Scholar

Gaatone, D. 1971. Étude descriptive du système de la negation en français contemporain. Geneva: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar

Giannakidou, A. 1994. The semantic licensing of NPIs and the Modern Greek subjunctive. Language and Cognition 4: 55–68.Google Scholar

Giannakidou, A. 1998. Polarity Sensitivity as (Non) Veridical Dependency. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Giannakidou, A. 1999. Affective dependencies. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 367–421.Google Scholar

Giannakidou, A. 2009. The dependency of the subjunctive revisited: Temporal semantics and polarity. Lingua 119(12): 1883–1908.Google Scholar

Giannakidou, A., and Stavrou, M.. 2008. Metalinguistic comparatives and negation in Greek. In Hill, D., ed., MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 57.Google Scholar

Giannakidou, A., and Yoon, S.. 2011. The subjective mode of comparison: Metalinguistic comparatives in Greek and Korean. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 9(3): 621–55.Google Scholar

Giannakidou, A., and Yoon, S.. 2010. No NPI licensing in clausal comparatives. In Grinsell, T., Baker, A., Thomas, J., Baglini, R., Keane, J., eds., Proceedings of the 46th Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 46). Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Giannakidou, A., and Yoon, S.. 2009. Metalinguistic comparatives in Greek and Korean: Attitude semantics, expressive content, and negative polarity items. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 13: 141–56. Online Publikationsverbund der Universität Stuttgart (OPUS).Google Scholar

Giannakidou, A., and Zwarts, F.. 1999. Aspectual properties of temporal connectives. In Mozer, A., ed., Greek Linguistics ’97: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Greek Linguistics. Athens: Ellinika Grammata, pp. 104–13.Google Scholar

Grévisse, M. 1986. Le bon usage. Paris: Éditions Duculot.Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. and Morgan, J., eds., Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Heim, I. 1992. Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs. Journal of Semantics 9: 183–221.Google Scholar

Jabłónska, P. 2003. Quirky n-words in Polish: NPIs, Negative Quantifiers or neither? In Dahl, A., Bentzen, K., and Svenonius, P., eds., Proceedings of the 19th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics 31(1).Google Scholar

Jespersen, O. 1917. Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: Host.Google Scholar

Jespersen, O. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Larrivée, P. 2005. Variation diachronique, variation synchronique et réseaux de polysémie: à propos des certaines régularités apparentes dans le changement sémantique. Verbum 25(4): 431–42.Google Scholar

Lasersohn, P. 2005. Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy 28: 643–86.Google Scholar

Lasersohn, P. 2008. Quantification and perspective in relativist semantics. University of Chicago Compositionality Workshop, May 9.Google Scholar

Lasersohn, P. 2009. Relative truth, speaker commitment, and control of implicit arguments. Synthese 166: 359–74.Google Scholar

Löbner, S. 2002. Understanding Semantics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Manzotti, E. 1982. Fenomeni di negazione espletiva in italiano. Studi di Gramatica Italiana 9: 273–338.Google Scholar

Manzotti, E., and Rigamonti, A.. 1991. La negazione. In Renzi, L. and Salvi, G., eds., Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, vol. 2: I sintagmi verbale, aggettivale, avverbiale; la subordinazione. Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 245–317.Google Scholar

Meibauer, J. 1990. Sentence mood, lexical category filling, and non-propositional nicht in German. Linguistische Berichte 130: 441–63.Google Scholar

Muller, C. 1991. La négation en français: syntaxe, sémantique et elements de comparaison avec les quatres langues romanes. Geneva: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar

Portner, P., and Zanuttini, R.. 1999. The force of negation in wh exclamatives and interrogatives. In Horn, R. L., and Kato, Y., eds., Negation and Polarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 193–231.Google Scholar

Portner, P., and Zanuttini, R.. 2000. The characterization of exclamative clauses in Paduan. Language 76(1): 123–32.Google Scholar

Potts, C. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Potts, C. 2007. The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33(2): 165–98.Google Scholar

Quer, J. 1998. Mood at the interface. Ph.D. thesis, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar

Restan, Per A. 1960. The objective case in negative clauses in Russian: The genitive or the accusative? Scando-Slavica VI: 92–112.Google Scholar

Sadock, J. M. 1971. Queclaratives. In Adams, D., Cambell, M. A., Cohen, V., Levins, J., Maxwell, E., Nygren, C., and Reighard, J., eds., Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 7: 223–32.Google Scholar

Sadock, J. M. 1974. Towards a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts. New York, San Francisco, and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Sawada, O. 2010. Pragmatic aspects of scalar modifiers. Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Stalnaker, R. 1984. Inquiry. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Tovena, L. M. 1996. An expletive negation which is not so redundant. Grammatical Theory and Romance Languages 4: 263–74. Selected Papers from the 25th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL XXV).Google Scholar

Tovena, L. M. 1998. The Fine Structure of Polarity Sensitivity. New York: Garland.Google Scholar

Van der Wouden, T. 1997. Polarity and “illogical negation”. In Kanazawa, M. and Pinon, C. J., eds., Dymanics, Polarity, and Quantification. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 17–45.Google Scholar

Van der Wouden, T., and Zwarts, F.. 1993. A semantic analysis of negative concord. SALT III: 202–19. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar

Van der Wurff, W. 1999. On EN with adversative predicates in the history of English. In van Ostade, I. T-B., Tottie, G., and Van der Wurff, W., eds., Negation in the History of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Van Helten, W. L. 1883. Vondel’s taal. Grammatica van het Nederlandsch der zeven-tiende eeuw. Syntaxis. Groningen: J. B. Wolters.Google Scholar

Villalta, E. 2006. Context dependence in the interpretation of questions and subjunctives. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tubingen.Google Scholar

Villalta, E. 2008. Mood and gradability: An investigation of the subjunctive mood in Spanish. Linguistics and Philosophy 31: 467–522.CrossRef Google Scholar

Yoon, J-H. 1993. Different semantics for different syntax: Relative clauses in Korean. OSUWPL 42: 199–226.Google Scholar

Yoon, S. 2011. Not in the mood: The syntax, semantics, and pragmatics of evaluative negation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Yoon, S. 2013. Parametric variation in subordinate evaluative negation: Japanese/Korean vs. Others. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 22(2): 133–66.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.