The Cambridge International Handbook of Lean Production Diverging Theories and New Industries around the World
Book contents
- The Cambridge International Handbook of Lean Production
- The Cambridge International Handbook of Lean Production
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Figures and Sidebars
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- 1 Lean Production as the Dominant Division of Labor
- Part I Theories of Lean Production
- Part II Lean Production across Industries
- Part III Lean Production Around the World
- 17 Lean in Europe and the USA – A New Dominant Division of Labour?
- 18 The Development and Diffusion of the Hyundai Production System
- 19 Transferring Lean to the United States
- 20 Disseminating Lean across the UK: A Personal Reflection
- 21 Lean Production in Germany
- 22 Tricolore
- 23 Lean Production in China: A Case Study of the Automobile Industry
- 24 Lean Production in India and Australia
- 25 The Four Stages of Lean in Mexico
- 26 Lean Production in Post-Communist Europe
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
25 - The Four Stages of Lean in Mexico
from Part III - Lean Production Around the World
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 March 2021
Book contents
- The Cambridge International Handbook of Lean Production
- The Cambridge International Handbook of Lean Production
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Figures and Sidebars
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- 1 Lean Production as the Dominant Division of Labor
- Part I Theories of Lean Production
- Part II Lean Production across Industries
- Part III Lean Production Around the World
- 17 Lean in Europe and the USA – A New Dominant Division of Labour?
- 18 The Development and Diffusion of the Hyundai Production System
- 19 Transferring Lean to the United States
- 20 Disseminating Lean across the UK: A Personal Reflection
- 21 Lean Production in Germany
- 22 Tricolore
- 23 Lean Production in China: A Case Study of the Automobile Industry
- 24 Lean Production in India and Australia
- 25 The Four Stages of Lean in Mexico
- 26 Lean Production in Post-Communist Europe
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
In the 1980s and even some part of the 1990s, perceived and real differences between the Japanese socio-cultural, institutional, and economic environment and that of the countries experiencing a wave of Japanese foreign direct investment (FDI) led to a plethora of academic research (Carrillo and Abo 2014). The principal focus was to identify the different set of core competences of competitive Japanese companies, especially Toyota, transferred in foreign countries. What finally emerged from some of the most notable research efforts was to clarify the necessity of applying and adapting the Japanese-style business practices to the managerial conditions in host countries (Kenny and Florida 1993; Abo 1994; Itagaki 1997; Babson 1998; among others).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge International Handbook of Lean ProductionDiverging Theories and New Industries around the World, pp. 595 - 614Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Abo, T. (ed.). 1994. Hybrid Factory: The Japanese Production System in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abo, T. (ed.). 2007. Japanese Hybrid Factories: A Comparison of Global Production Strategies. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abo, T. 2014. “Researching international transfer of the Japanese-style management and production system: hybrid factories in six continents.” Asian Business & Management. 14(1): 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alegría, T., Carrillo, J., and Alonso, J. 1997. “Restructuring of production and territorial change: a second industrialization hub in Northern México.” CEPAL Review. 61: 187–205.Google Scholar
Babson, S. 1998. “Mazda and Ford at Flat Rock: transfer and hybridization of the Japanese model,” pp. 161–188 in Tolliday, S., Charron, E., and Jurgens, U. (eds.). Between Imitation and Innovation. The Transfer and Hybridization of Productive Models in the International Automobile Industry. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bair, J. and Gereffi, G. 2001. “Local clusters in global chains: the causes and consequences of export dynamism in Torreon: the blue jeans industry.” World Development. 29(11): 1885–1903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensusán, G. and Middlebrook, K. 2012. “Organized labor and politics in Mexico,” pp. 335–364 in Camp, R. A. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Mexican Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195377385.013.0015.Google Scholar
Bizberg, I. 1999. “Le syndicalisme mexicain face à la mondialisation et à la décomposition du régime politique” [Mexican trade unionism in the face of globalization and the breakdown of the political system]. La revue de l’IRES. 29: 131–165.Google Scholar
Boyer, R., Charron, E., Jurgens, U., and Tolliday, S. (eds.). 1998. Between Imitation and Innovation. The Transfer and Hybridization of Productive Models in the International Automobile Industry. New York: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, R. and Freyssenet, M. 2000. “A new approach of productive models. The world that changed the machine.” Industrielle Beziehungen. 7(4): 385–413.Google Scholar
Brito, J. 2014. “Situación actual y prospectiva de la industria de televisores en Baja California” [Current and prospective situation of the television industry in Baja California]. PhD Dissertation (Doctorado en Administración, Facultad de Contaduría y Administración). México: UNAM.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J. 1989. “Calidad con Consenso en las maquiladoras ¿Asociación factible?” [Quality with consensus in the maquiladoras. a feasible association?] en Frontera Norte 1(2), El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, núm. 2, julio-diciembre, pp. 105–132.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J. 1993. “Estructura Ocupacional en Plantas Maquiladoras” [Occupational Structure in Maquiladora Plants], pp. 47–133 in Jorge, C. (ed.). Condiciones de empleo y capacitación en las maquiladoras de exportación en México [Conditions of Employment and Training in Export Maquiladoras in Mexico]. Tijuana, México: Secretaría del Trabajo y Previsión Social[Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare]/El Colegio de la Frontera Norte.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J. 1995. “Flexible production in the auto sector: industrial reorganization at Ford-México.” World Development. 23(1): 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrillo, J. and Ramírez, M. A. 1990. “Modernización tecnológica y cambios organizacionales en la industria maquiladora” [Technological modernization and organizational changes in the maquiladora industry]. Estudios Fronterizos. 23: 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrillo, J. and Montiel, Y. 1998. “Ford’s Hermosillo Plant: The Trajectory of Development of a Hybrid Model,” pp. 295–318 in Boyer, R., Charron, E., Jurgens, U., and Tolliday, S. (eds.). Between Imitation and Innovation. The Transfer and Hybridization of Productive Models in the International Automobile Industry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrillo, J. and Hualde, A. 1998. “Third generation Maquiladoras? The Delphi-General Motors Case.” Journal of Borderlands Studies. XIII. 1: 79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrillo, J., Mortimore, M., and Alonso, J. 1998. El impacto de las Empresas Transnacionales en la Reestructuración Industrial de México. El caso de las industrias de partes para vehículos y de televisores. [The Impact of Transnational Companies on the Industrial Restructuring of Mexico. The Case of the Vehicle Parts and Television Industries]. Santiago, Chile: CEPAL.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J. and Hinojosa, R. 2001. “Cableando el Norte de México: La evolución de la industria maquiladora de arneses” [Wiring Northern Mexico: The Evolution of the Harness Maquila Industry]. Región y Sociedad. XIII. 21: 79–116.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J. and Gomis, R. 2005. “Generaciones de maquiladoras: un primer acercamiento a su medición” [Generations of maquiladoras: a first approach to its measurement]. Frontera Norte. 17(33): 25–51.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J., Martínez, J. and Lara, J. 2005. “El comportamiento de la maquila en Querétaro” [The Behavior of the Maquila in Querétaro], pp.80–102 in Enrique, G. (ed.). Modelos de producción en la maquila de exportación: la crisis del toyotismo precario [Production Models in the Export Maquiladora: The Crisis of Precarious Toyotism]. México, D. F.: Plaza y Valdés.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J. and Lara, A. 2005. “Mexican Maquiladoras: new capabilities coordination and the emergence of new generation of companies.” Innovation and Economic Development. 7(2–3): 256–273.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J. 2009. “Cómo interpretar el modelo de maquila? Cuatro décadas de debate” [How to Interpret the Maquila Model? Four Decades of Debate], pp. 81–108 in Rosio, B., Grijalba, G., Lara, B., Velázquez, L., Rodríguez, L., and Zuñiga, M. (eds.). Cuatro décadas del modelo maquilador en el norte de México [Four Decades of the Maquiladora Model in Northern Mexico]. Tijuana, México: COLEF/COLSON.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J. and Zárate, R. 2009. “The evolution of Maquiladora best practices: 1965–2008.” Journal of Business Ethics. 88(S2): 335–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrillo, J. and Torres, B. 2010. “De qué modernización hablamos? Trayectorias productivas en la industria de alimentos y bebidas en Yucatán” [What Modernization Are We Talking About? Productive Trajectories in the Food and Beverage Industry in Yucatán], pp. 15–46 in Maeecela, H. (ed.). Estudios laborales en México [Labor Studies in Mexico]. México, D. F.: Plaza y Valdés.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J. and Gomis, R. 2011. “Un estudio sobre prácticas de empleo en firmas multinacionales en México: Un primer mapeo” [A study on employment practices in multinational firms in Mexico: a first mapping]. Frontera Norte. 23(46): 35–60.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J. and Hualde, A. 2013. “Una maquiladora diferente? Competencias laborales y profesionales en la industria aeroespacial en Baja California” [A Different Maquiladora? Labor and Professional Skills in the Aerospace Industry in Baja California], pp. 163–197 in Mónica, C. (ed.). La industria aeroespacial. Complejidad productiva e institucional [The Aerospace Industry. Productive and Institutional Complexity]. México, D. F.: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J. and Abo, T. 2014. “Comparative Study of Application-Adaptation of Japanese Production System at Auto Subsidiaries in Developing Countries: Nissan and GM in South Africa, Egypt and Mexico.” Paper presented at the 22nd International Colloqium of GERPISA, Kyoto, June 4–6.Google Scholar
Carrillo, J., Bensusán, G. and Micheli, J. (eds.). 2017. Es posible innovar y mejorar laboralmente? Estudio de trayectorias de empresas multinacionales en México [Is It Possible to Innovate and Improve Labor? Study of Trajectories of Multinational Companies in Mexico]. México City, México: UAM-Azcapotzalco.Google Scholar
Casalet, M. and González, L. 2006. “La maquila de exportación en Chihuahua: Hacia la construcción de un entorno institucional diverso y complejo” [The export maquila in Chihuahua: towards the construction of a diverse and complex institutional environment]. Paper presented at V Congreso Nacional AMET, Oaxtepec, Morelos, Mexico, May 16–17. www2.izt.uam.mx/amet/vcongreso/webamet/indicedemesa/ponencias/MESA7/Casaletgonzm7.pdf.Google Scholar
Contreras, O., Olea, J., Fuentes, M., and Robles, R. 2018. Formación y escalamiento de pymes mexicanas intensivas en conocimiento [Report] [Training and Upgrading of Knowledge-Intensive Mexican SMEs]. Tijuana, México: El Colegio de la Frontera Norte.Google Scholar
De la Garza, E. 2007. “The crisis of the Maquiladora model in Mexico.” Work and Occupations. 34(4), 399–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De la Garza, E. and Bouzas, A. 1998. “Flexibilidad del trabajo y contratación colectiva en México” [Labor flexibility and collective bargaining in Mexico]. Revista Mexicana de Sociología. 3: 87–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, L. and Brown, F. 2004. “Medición de las capacidades tecnológicas en la industria mexicana” [Measurement of technological capabilities in the Mexican industry]. Revista de la CEPAL. 83: 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutrénit, G. and Vera-Cruz, A. 2002. “Technological capability accumulation in the ‘maquila industry’ in Mexico.” Cadernos EBAPE.BR [online]. 3(n. spe.): 01–16. doi: 10.1590/S1679-39512005000500016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutrénit, G. and Vera-Cruz, A. 2004. La IED y Las Capacidades de Innovación y Desarrollo Locales: Lecciones del Estudio de los Casos de la Maquila Automotriz y Electrónica en Ciudad Juárez [FDI and Local Innovation and Development Capacities: Lessons from the Study of the Cases of the Automotive and Electronic Maquila in Ciudad Juárez]. México D. F.: CEPAL.Google Scholar
Dutrénit, G., Vera-Cruz, A., Arias, A., Sampedor, J. L. and Uriostegui, A. 2006. Acumulación de capacidades tecnológicas en subsidiarias de empresas globales en México. El caso de la industria maquiladora de exportación. México [Accumulation of Technological Capabilities in Subsidiaries of Global Companies in Mexico. The Case of the Export Maquiladora Industry. México], ed. Miguel Ángel Porrúa. México, D. F.: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Kelly, M. P. 1983. For We Are Sold, I and my People: Women and Industry in Mexico’s Frontier. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Gereffi, G. 1991. “The ‘old’ and ‘new’ Maquiladoras industries in Mexico: what is their contribution to national development and North American integration?” Nuestra Economía. 2(8): 39–63.Google Scholar
Gereffi, G. 1996. “Mexico’s ‘Old’ and ‘New’ Maquiladora Industries: Contrasting Approaches to North American Integration,” pp. 85–105 in Otero, G. (ed.), Mexico’s Future(s): Economic Restructuring and Politics. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Helper, S. 2019. “Complements or substitutes? Management of labor and technology in the U.S. autoparts industry.” Paper presented at the International Seminar USMCA/T-MEC/CUSMA, Trade protectionism, regional integration and labor disparities in the North American automotive industry, FLACSO-Mexico, México, November 8.Google Scholar
Helper, S. 2000. “Disruptive technical change and the location of production” [draft document]. Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve University.Google Scholar
Hernández, M. 2017. “Las configuraciones y estrategias productivas de relaciones laborales y sindicales en grandes corporaciones en México” [The Configurations and Productive Strategies of Labor and Union Relations in Large Corporations in Mexico], pp. 175–248 in de la Garza Toledo, E. and Hernandez Romo, M. (eds.). Configuraciones productivas y relaciones laborales en empresas multinacionales en América Latina [Productive Configurations and Labor Relations in Multinational Companies in Latin America]. Ciudad de México: UAM-Iztapalapa/Gedisa.Google Scholar
Hualde, A. and Carrillo, J. 2007. La industria aeroespacial en Baja California. Caracteristicas productivas y competencias laborales y profesionales [The Aerospace Industry in Baja California. Productive Characteristics and Labor and Professional Skills]. Tijuana, México: Colef.Google Scholar
Iammarino, S., Padilla-Perez, R., and von Tunzelmann, N. 2008. “Technological capabilities and global–local interactions: the electronics industry in two Mexican regions.” World Development. 36(10): 1980–2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itagaki, H. (ed.). 1997. The Japanese Production System: Hybrid Factories in East Asia. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kamiyama, K. 1994. “The typical Japanese overseas factory,” pp. 58–81 in Abo, T. (ed.). Hybrid Factory: The Japanese Production System in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawamura, T. (ed.). 2011. Hybrid Factories in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney, M. and Florida, R. 1993. Beyond Mass Production, The Japanese System and its Transfer to the U.S. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenney, M. and Florida, R. 1994. “Japanese maquiladoras: production, organization and global commodity chains.” World Development. 22(1): 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koido, A. 1992. Between Two Forces of Restructuring: US–Japanese Competition and the Transformation of Mexico´s Maquiladora Industry. Baltimore, MD: Johns-Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Kumon, H. and Abo, T. (eds.). 2004. The Hybrid Factory in Europe: The Japanese Management and Production System Transferred. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lara, A. 2003. “Redes y competencia tecnológica en la construcción de estándares” [Networks and technological competence in the construction of standards]. Análisis Económico 18(38): 209–228.Google Scholar
Lara, A., Hernández, C., Sánchez, L., and Villavicencio, D. 2004. “Dilemas de la evolución del cluster maquilador eléctrico-electrónico del Norte de México: Una exploración” [Dilemmas of the evolution of the electric-electronic maquiladora cluster of northern Mexico: an exploration], UAM-X, México, reporte Proyecto Conacyt no 31902 (Documento Interno).Google Scholar
Lévesque, C., Gomis, R., Emilien, B., and Carrillo, J. 2020. “Power Dynamics in Regional Aerospace Clusters in Mexico: A Comparison of Baja California and Querétaro,” in Fairbrother, P. et al. Unions at Work in Regions and Sectors: Mobilizing and Recasting Governance for Economic and Social Development. Oxford: Oxford Press [forthcoming].Google Scholar
Lung, Y. 1998. “Is the rise of emerging countries as automobile producers an irreversible phenomenon?” Paper presented at Sixth International Colloquium GERPISA, Paris, June 4, 5, and 6.Google Scholar
Maynez-Guaderrama, A., Valles-Monge, L., and Hernández, J. 2018. “Capacidades organizacionales y ventaja competitiva: análisis en empresas mexicanas exportadoras de autopartes” [Organizational capabilities and competitive advantage: analysis in Mexican auto parts exporting companies]. Revista Entreciencias. 6(17): 17–33.Google Scholar
Mertens, L. and Palomares, L. 1988. “El surgimiento de un nuevo tipo de trabajador en la industria de alta tecnología. El caso de la electrónica” [The Emergence of a New Kind of Worker in the High Tech Industry. The Case of Electronics], pp. 170–198 in Gutiérrez, E. (ed.). Reestructuración Productiva y Clase Obrera. [Productive Restructuring and the Working Class]. México, D. F.: Editorial Siglo XXI-UNAM.Google Scholar
Middlebrook, K. 1995. The Paradox of Revolution: Labor, the State, and Authoritarianism in Mexico. Baltimore, MD: JHU Press.Google Scholar
Montoya, B., Dowell, A., and Escobedo, C. 2014. Desarrollo de un modelo de implementación de Manufactura Esbelta en empresas maquiladora [Development of a Lean Manufacturing implementation model in maquiladora companies], paper presented at XIX Congreso Internacional de Investigación en Ciencias Administrativas, April 21–24, Durango, Mexico: ACACIA (Academia de Ciencias Administrativas) [Academy of Administrative Sciences].Google Scholar
Oliver, N. and Wilkinson, B. 1988. The Japanization of British Industry. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sandoval, S. 2017. “Procesos de innovación en la planta Ford de Hermosillo: centros de responsabilidad regional y gestión del conocimiento” [Innovation Processes at the Ford de Hermosillo Plant: Regional Responsibility and Knowledge Management Centers], pp. 163–195 in Sandoval, S. and Covarrubias, A., Rumbo al auto de futuro. Innovación, sistemas de calidad y trabajo en la industria automotriz de México [Towards the Car of the Future. Innovation, Quality Systems and Work in Mexico’s Automotive Industry]. Mexico City, Mexico: Clave Editorial/AM Editores.Google Scholar
Shaiken, H. and Browne, H. 1991. “Japanese Work Organization in Mexico,” pp. 25–50 in Székely, G. (ed.), Manufacturing Across Borders and Oceans. Japan, The United States and Mexico. San Diego, CA: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. 1992. Exports and Local Development Mexico’s New Maquiladoras. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Womack, J., Jones, D., and Roos, D. 1990. The Machine That Changed the World. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Won Choi, D. and Kenney, M. 1997. “The globalization of Korean industry: Korean maquiladoras in Mexico.” Frontera Norte. 9(17): 5–22. doi:10.17428/rfn.v9i17.1456.Google Scholar
Yamazaki, K., Wooseok, J., and Abo, T. (eds.). 2013. Hybrid Factories in Latin America: Japanese Management Transferred. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar