Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T17:05:50.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

26 - Lean Production in Post-Communist Europe

Formalisation and Employee Involvement in Russia

from Part III - Lean Production Around the World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2021

Thomas Janoski
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Darina Lepadatu
Affiliation:
Kennesaw State University, Georgia
Get access

Summary

Up until three decades ago there existed a viable alternative to capitalism: the socialist regime in the Soviet Union and the neighbouring states of Eastern Europe persisted for over seventy years. These Communist Party-led states had the ability to foster industrial and scientific success, and to provide free high-quality education and free healthcare to its citizens. Yet, despite being capable of producing space rockets, it had notorious difficulties in assuring an even flow of mass production and manufacturing high-quality consumer goods. Although this regime ceased to exist in the early 1990s, the post-communist states in Europe have still not converged with the advanced industrial democracies in terms of their political systems. Nevertheless, the opening up of the new markets for foreign direct investment has played an important role in the diffusion of new management systems, including lean production.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge International Handbook of Lean Production
Diverging Theories and New Industries around the World
, pp. 615 - 638
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Paul S. 2012. “The sociological ambivalence of bureaucracy: from Weber via Gouldner to Marx.Organization Science 23(1): 244–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Paul S. and Borys, Bryan. 1996. “Two types of bureaucracy: enabling and coercive.Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 6189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Paul S. and Cole, Robert E.. 1993. “Designed for learning: a tale of two auto plants.Sloan Management Review 34(3): 8594.Google Scholar
Adler, Paul S., Goldoftas, Barbara, and Levine, David I.. 1999. “Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota Production System”. Organization Science 10(1): 4368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akhramovich, Aleksey, Borisova, Ekaterina, and Odinokov, Sergey. 2017. “Berezhlivoe proizvodstvo v Rossii: mif ili realnost?” [Lean Manufacturing in Russia: Myth or Reality?], Kachestvo. Innovatsii. Obrazovanie Quality. Innovations. Education. 10: 7075.Google Scholar
Alasheev, Sergei. 1995. “Informal relations in the Soviet system of production”, pp. 2868 in Management and Industry in Russia: Formal and Informal Relations in the Period of Transition, edited by Clarke, S.. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Altman, Yochanan and Morrison, Claudio. 2015. “Informal economic relations and organizations. Everyday organizational life in Soviet and post-Soviet economies”. Journal of Organizational Change Management 28(5): 749–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreeva, Tatiana E. 2006. “Upravlenie personalom v period izmeneniy v rossiyskiy kompaniyakh: metodiki rasprostranennye i rezul’tativnye” [Personnel management in the period of transition in Russian companies: popular and effective methods]. Rossiyskiy zhurnal menedzhmenta [Russian Management Journal] 4(2): 2548.Google Scholar
Andreeva, Tatiana, Festing, Marion, Minbaeva, Dana B., and Muratbekova-Touron, Maral. 2014. “The Janus faces of IHRM in Russian MNEs”. Human Resource Management 53(6): 967–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appelbaum, Eileen, Bailey, Thomas, and Berg, Peter. 2001. “Do High Performance Work Systems Pay Off?” pp. 85107 in The Transformation of Work, edited by Vallas, S. P., first ed. Amsterdam: JAI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artemieva, Vera V., Kayl, Yakov Y., and Bakhracheva, Yulia S.. 2015. “Otsenka effektivnosti raboty Volgogradskogo otdela materialno-tekhnicheskogo obespechenia OAO “RZHD” za schet optimizatsii tekhnologicheskikh protsessov” [Evaluating the impact of optimisation of technological processes on the effectiveness of the Volgograd department of material and technical support of OAO “RZHD]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta [Bulletin of Volgograd State University] 17(2): 613.Google Scholar
Barley, Stephen R. and Kunda, Gideon. 1992. “Design and devotion: surges of rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse”. Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 363–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyshev, Konstantin V., Vandyshev, Michail N., and Priamikova, Elena V.. 2006. “Kachestvo v rossiyskoi promyshlennosti: mechanizmy obespechenia” [Quality in the Russian industry: the mechanisms to assure it]. Ekonomicheskaya Sotsiologia [Economic Sociology] 7(3): 5368.Google Scholar
Campbell, Robert W. 1972. “Management spillovers from Soviet space and military programs”. Soviet Studies 23(4): 586607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Bob, Danford, Andy, Howcroft, Debra, Richardson, Helen, Smith, Andrew, and Taylor, Phil. 2011. “‘All they lack is a chain’: lean and the new performance management in the British civil service.” New Technology, Work and Employment 26(2): 8397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Simon, ed. 1995. Management and Industry in Russia: Formal and Informal Relations in the Period of Transition. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Clarke, Simon. 2007. The Development of Capitalism in Russia. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Simon and Pringle, Tim. 2011. The Challenge of Transition: Trade Unions in Russia, China and Vietnam. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dixon, Sarah E. A., Day, Marc, and Brewster, Chris. 2014. “Changing HRM systems in two Russian oil companies: Western hegemony or Russian spetsifika?The International Journal of Human Resource Management 25(22): 3134–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolgopyatova, Tatiana G. and Khomyakova, Evgenia V.. 2016. “Stimuly, effekty i problemy vnedrenia sistemy berezhlivogo proizvodstva: primer PAO ‘KAMAZ’” [The motives, effects, and problems related to the implementation of lean production systems: the case of PAO KAMAZ]. Rossiyskiy Zhurnal Menedzhmenta [Russian Management Journal] 14(2): 4976.Google Scholar
Donova, Inna. 2005. “Izmenenia v sistemakh oplaty truda” [Changes in the work remuneration systems], pp. 116–36 in Praktiki upravlenia personalom na sovremennykh rossiyskikh predpriatiakh [Personnel Management Practices in Contemporary Russian Enterprises] edited by Kabalina, Veronika. I.. Moscow: ISITO.Google Scholar
Fey, Carl F. 2008. “Overcoming a leader’s greatest challenge: involving employees in firms in Russia”. Organizational Dynamics 37(3): 254–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortin, Jessica. 2012. “Is there a necessary condition for democracy? The role of state capacity in postcommunist countries”. Comparative Political Studies 45(7): 903–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Theodore P. and Hout, Michael. 1998. “More shock than therapy: market transition, employment, and income in Russia, 1991–1995”. The American Journal of Sociology 104(1): 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, Vipin and Hanges, Paul J.. 2004. “Regional and climate clustering of societal cultures”, pp. 178218 in Culture, Leadership, and Organizations. The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, edited by House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., and Gupta, V.. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gurkov, Igor, Morgunov, Evgeny, and Saidov, Zokirzhon. 2017. “Robustness and flexibility of human resource management practices.” Employee Relations 39(5): 594625, doi:10.1108/ER-07-2016-0138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurkov, Igor B., Zelenova, Olga I., Goldberg, Arkadiv. S., and Saidov, Zokirzhon B.. 2009. “Sistema upravleniya personalom na rossiyskikh firmakh v zerkale mezhdunarodnogo sravneniya” [Personnel management system in Russian companies in the mirror of international comparison]. Mir Rossii Russia’s Universe 3: 132–50.Google Scholar
Gurkov, Igor B., Zelenova, Olga I., and Saidov, Zokirzhon B.. 2012. “Mutation of HRM practices in Russia: an application of CRANET methodology”. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 23(7): 1289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Malcolm R. 1985. “Soviet product quality and soviet state standards”. International Journal for Quality and Reliability Management 2(1): 4964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jürgens, Ulrich and Krzywdzinski, Martin. 2016. New Worlds of Work: Varieties of Work in Car Factories in the BRIC Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jürgens, Ulrich, Malsch, Thomas, and Dohse, Knuth. 1993. Breaking from Taylorism: Changing Forms of Work in the Automobile Industry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kapelyushnikov, Rostislav, Kuznetsov, Andrei, and Kuznetsova, Olga. 2011. “Diversity within capitalism: the Russian labour market model”. Employee Relations 33(4): 395412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klimova, Svetlana G. and Clement, Carine. 2004. “Rol’ novogo Trudovogo kodeksa v reglamentatsii trudovykh otnoshenii v Rossii” [The role of the new Labour Code in the regulation of labour relations in Russia], pp. 1223 in Stanovlenie trudovykh otnoshenii v postsovetskoi Rossii [The Formation of Labour Relations in post-Soviet Russia], edited by DeBardeleben, J., Klimova, S., and Yadov, V.. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt.Google Scholar
Kononova, Vera. Y. 2006. “Modernizatsiya Proizvodstvennykh Sistem Na Rossiiskikh Promyshlennykh Predpriyatiyakh: Sovremennoe Sostoyanie i Perspektivy” [Modernization of production systems in Russian industrial enterprises: contemporary state and prospects]. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta [Russian Management Journal] 4(4): 119–32.Google Scholar
Krzywdzinski, Martin. 2018. Consent and Control in the Authoritarian Workplace: Russia and China Compared. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, David and Myant, Martin, eds. 2007. Varieties of Capitalism in Post-Communist Countries. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liker, Jeffrey K., and Hoseus, Michael. 2008. Toyota Culture: The Heart and Soul of the Toyota Way. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Luque, de, Mary S. and Javidan, Mansour. 2004. “Uncertainty avoidance”, pp. 602653 in Culture, Leadership, and Organizations. The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, edited by House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., and Gupta, V.. London: Sage.Google Scholar
McCann, Leo. 2014. International and Comparative Business: Foundations of Political Economies. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Leo and Schwartz, Gregory. 2006. “Terms and conditions apply: management restructuring and the global integration of post-socialist societies”. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 17(8): 1339–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michailova, Snejina. 2002. “When common sense becomes uncommon: participation and empowerment in Russian companies with Western participation”. Journal of World Business 37(3): 180–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, Claudio and Bizyukov, Petr. 2017. “Informal and uncertain: employment relations through the broken mirror of Russian social sciences”. Work, Employment and Society 31(3): 553–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shulzhenko, Elena. 2012. “Human Resource Management and Labour Relations in Post-Socialist Russia”, pp. 63102 in AutoUni-Schriftenreihe, Vol. 29, Human Resource Management and Labour Relations in the BRICs: A Review of the Research Literature, edited by Jürgens, U.. Berlin: Logos Verlag.Google Scholar
Shulzhenko, Elena. 2017. Reforming the Russian Industrial Workplace: International Management Standards Meet the Soviet Legacy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Siegelbaum, Lewis H. 1988. Stakhanovism and the Politics of Productivity in the USSR, 1935–1941. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Natalya and Thomas, Ekaterina. 2015. “Determinants of Russia’s informal economy: the impact of corruption and multinational firms”. Journal of East-West Business 21(2): 102–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobolev, Eduard N. 2008. Sotsial’no-trudovye otnosheniya v Rossii:istoriya, sovremennoe sostoyanie, perspektivy [Social and Labour Relations in Russia: History, Contemporary State and Prospects]. Moscow: Institut ekonomiki RAN.Google Scholar
Sochor, Zinovia A. 1981. “Soviet Taylorism revisited”. Soviet Studies 33(2): 246–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Paul, Mrozowicki, Adam, Danford, Andy, and Murphy, Ken. 2016. “Lean as ideology and practice: a comparative study of the impact of lean production on working life in automotive manufacturing in the United Kingdom and Poland”. Competition & Change 20(3): 147–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiaglov, Sergei and Takmasheva, Irina. 2017. “Ispolzovanie tekhnologiy berezhlivogo proizvodstva v kachestve osnovy innovatsionnogo razvitia regionov” [Applying lean production technologies as a basis for innovative development of the regions].Voprosy regulirovania ekonomiki [Issues in Regulation of Economy] 8(2): 97110.Google Scholar
Upchurch, Martin, Croucher, Richard, Danilovich, Hanna, and Morrison, Claudio. 2015. “The transformation of work and industrial relations in the post-Soviet bloc: 25 years on from 1989”. Work, Employment and Society 29(3): NP1–NP11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Womack, James P., Jones, Daniel T., and Roos, Daniel. 1990. The Machine That Changed the World. New York: Rawson Associates.Google Scholar
Woolfson, Charles 2007. “Pushing the envelope: the ‘informalization’ of labour in post-communist new EU member states”. Work, Employment and Society 21(3): 551–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaslavskaya, Tatyana I. and Shabanova, Marina A.. 2002. “Nelegalnye trudovye praktiki i socialnye transformacii v Rossii” [Illegal labour practices and social transformations in Russia]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovania [Sociological Studies] 6: 317.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×