1.Wilkerson, I: New home in suburb seems tailored to Sears. New York Times, Jul. 19, 1989, A10Google Scholar

2.Myers, L, McMahon, C: Women cops: from novelty to the norm. Chicago Tribune, Jul. 5, 1991, p. 124Google Scholar

3.U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation: Uniform Crime Report Statistics 1990. Available at www.ucrdatatool.gov/Search/Crime/Local/RunCrimeJurisbyJuris.cfmGoogle Scholar

4.Fountain, JW: Teens and trouble. Teenagers in the northwest suburbs are facing growing pressures to join gangs. Chicago Tribune, Feb. 13, 1991Google Scholar

5.Fountain, J, Christian, SE. Fight ends with officer killing man. Chicago Tribune, Jun. 28, 1991, p. 1Google Scholar

6.Jaffee v. Redmond, 51 F.3d 1346 (7th Cir. 1995); the minor edits are Justice Coffey’s, not my own. Case text available at: http://jaffee-redmond.org/cases/appellate.htmGoogle Scholar

7.McMahon, C, Ibata, D: A case of heroism or racism? Chicago Tribune, Jun. 30, 1991, p. 1Google Scholar

8.Fountain, JW, Christian, SE: Hoffman Estates cop exonerated in fatal shooting. Chicago Tribune, Jul. 17, 1991, p. 5Google Scholar

9.Fountain, JW, Kirby, J: Medal for cop adds fuel to fire in fatal shooting. Chicago Tribune, May 28, 1992Google Scholar

10.Beyer, K: First person: Jaffee v. Redmond therapist speaks. Am Psychoanalyst 34: 3, 2000Google Scholar

11.NY Rev. Stat. 1829 11, 406 Part 3, title 3.Google Scholar

12.Missouri Laws, 1835. P. 623, section 17.Google Scholar

13.Goldstein, AS, Katz, J: Psychiatrist–patient privilege: the GAP proposal and the Connecticut statute. Am J Psychiatry 118: 735, 1962Google Scholar

14.Louisell, DW: Psychologist in today’s legal world. Minnesota Law Rev 41: 733–5, 1956–57Google Scholar

15.Binder v. Ruvell, Circuit Court of Cook County, No. 52C2535 (1952); reprinted in the JAMA 150: 1241, 1952CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16.Slovenko, R, Usdin, G: The psychiatrist and privileged communication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 4(5):431–4, 1961Google Scholar

17.Sidel, VW: Confidential information and the physician. New Engl J Med 264: 1133–7, 1961Google Scholar

18.Hoover, JE: Let’s keep America healthy. JAMA 144: 1094–5, 1950Google Scholar

19.Appel, JM: The dangers of the underprivileged ethicist. New Mexico L Rev 42: 1, 2012Google Scholar

20.House Report No. 93–650 (House Committee on the Judiciary, 1974) The nine privileges to be applied in federal courts were those that applied to relationships between lawyer and client, psychotherapist and patient, husband and wife, and penitent and clergyman, as well as those covering required reports, political vote, trade secrets, secrets of state, and the identity of an informerGoogle Scholar

21.Miller, RF: Creating evidentiary privileges: An argument for the judicial approach. Conn L Rev 31: 772–5, 1999 (detailing the controversy surrounding the committee’s proposal)Google Scholar

22.Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 501 (1975)Google Scholar

23.See Cerveny, KL, Kent, MJ: Evidence law: The psychotherapist–patient privilege in federal courts. Notre Dame L Rev 59: 791, 1984Google Scholar

24.Doe v. Diamond, 964 F.2d 1325 (1992)Google Scholar

25.In re Zuniga, 714 F.2d 632 (1983)Google Scholar

26.United States v. Burtrum, 17 F.3d 1299 (1994)Google Scholar

27.In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 867 F.2d 562 (1989)Google Scholar

28.United States v. Corona, 849 F.2d 562 (1988)Google Scholar

29.United States v. Meagher, 531 F.2d 752 (1976)Google Scholar

30.Jaffee v. Redmond, 51 F.3d 1346 (7th Cir. 1995) The case text is available here: http://jaffee-redmond.org/cases/appellate.htmGoogle Scholar

31.Christian, SE: Excessive force trial puts focus on knife. Chicago Tribune, Dec. 14, 1993, p. 1Google Scholar

32.Wiltz, T: Victim was in danger, accused cop testifies. Chicago Tribune, Dec. 16, 1993Google Scholar

33.Greenhouse, L: Justices to decide case on establishing therapist-client privilege. New York Times, Oct. 17, 1995, p. A23Google Scholar

34.Taranto, R: Brief of the American Psychiatric Association and the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law as Amici Curiae in Support of the Respondents. Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, No. 95–266, 1996Google Scholar

35.Days, DS: Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Respondent. Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, No. 95–266, 1996Google Scholar

36.Oral Argument in Jaffee v. Redmond Before the United States Supreme Court, 518 U.S. 1, Feb. 26, 1996Google Scholar

37.Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1 (1996) Quote within Stevens quote is from Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 U.S. 383, 389 (1981)Google Scholar

38.Tatum, C: Family awarded $100,000 in wrongful death trial. Daily Herald (Illinois), Dec. 7, 1996, p. 4Google Scholar

39.O’Connor, M, Searcey, D: Victim’s sons get $100,000: jury clears ex-Hoffman cop but oks damages. Chicago Tribune, Dec. 7, 1996Google Scholar

40.Thevenot, B: ‘Help me, please don’t let me die’: 911 operators confront grim task, ghastly calls. Times-Picayune, Sep. 19, 2005Google Scholar

41.Borchmann, P: Ex-Hoffman Estates cop still lives with 1991 killing. Chicago Tribune, Mar. 27, 1996, p. 1Google Scholar

42.Appelbaum, PS: Jaffee v. Redmond: Psychotherapist–patient privilege in the federal courts. Psychiatric Services 47 (1033–34) 1996Google ScholarPubMed

43.Greenburg, JC: High court: Counseling is confidential. Chicago Tribune, Jun. 14, 1996Google Scholar

44.Mosher, PW: Psychotherapist-patient privilege: The history and significance of the United States Supreme Court’s Decision in the case of Jaffee v. Redmond. In Koggel, CM, Furlong, A., Levin, C. (Eds.), Confidential Relationships: Psychoanalytic, Ethical, and Legal Context (pp. 177 ff). Amsterdam: Brill Rodopi, 2003Google Scholar

45.Stone, MS: The Supreme Court adopts a federal psychotherapist–patient privilege. Mercer Law Rev 48: 1283, 1997Google Scholar