Book contents
- From Courtroom to Clinic
- From Courtroom to Clinic
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Raising American Standards in the Treatment of Persons with Mental Illness
- 3 The Limits of Hospitalization after Commitment
- 4 Who Speaks for the Children?
- 5 The Right to Refuse Treatment
- 6 The Least Restrictive Alternative
- 7 Informed Consent
- 8 The Right to Die and End-of-Life Decision-Making
- 9 Prohibiting Psychiatrist–Patient Sex
- 10 Psychotherapist–Patient Privilege
- 11 Protecting Others from Dangerous Patients
- 12 The Insanity Defense
- 13 Conclusion
- Index
- References
7 - Informed Consent
Canterbury v. Spence (1972)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 February 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- From Courtroom to Clinic
- From Courtroom to Clinic
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Raising American Standards in the Treatment of Persons with Mental Illness
- 3 The Limits of Hospitalization after Commitment
- 4 Who Speaks for the Children?
- 5 The Right to Refuse Treatment
- 6 The Least Restrictive Alternative
- 7 Informed Consent
- 8 The Right to Die and End-of-Life Decision-Making
- 9 Prohibiting Psychiatrist–Patient Sex
- 10 Psychotherapist–Patient Privilege
- 11 Protecting Others from Dangerous Patients
- 12 The Insanity Defense
- 13 Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- From Courtroom to ClinicLegal Cases that Changed Mental Health Treatment, pp. 69 - 83Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
1.Murphy, WJ: Canterbury v. Spence – the case and a few comments. Forum 11(3): 716–26, 1976Google Scholar
4.Hippocrates: Hippocratic Corpus [Excerpts]. Translated by J. Longrigg. Academic Medicine: 88(1): 80, 2013. Translated by Michael North. History of Medicine Division, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. Available at: https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Fulltext/2013/01000/Hippocratic_Corpus___Excerpts_.25.aspx Accessed January 23, 2018Google Scholar
5.Pinals, DA, Appelbaum, PS: The history and current status of competence and informed consent in psychiatric research. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci 37:82–94, 2000Google Scholar
6.Appelbaum, PS: Almost a Revolution: Mental Health Law and the Limits of Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994Google Scholar
11.Leopold, E: Irma Natanson and the legal landmark Natanson v. Kline. Breast Cancer Action Newsletter #83C, Fall 2004.Google Scholar
12.Brennan, WJ: Tribute to the Honorable J. Skelly Wright. The Yale Law Journal 98: 207–209, 1988Google Scholar
13.Schwartz, GT: J. Skelly Wright. Encyclopedia of the American Constitution, The Gale Group, 2000 (Entry written 1992). Available at www.encyclopedia.com/politics/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/wright-j-skelly-1911-1988 Accessed 1/24/18Google Scholar
14.Application of the President and Directors of Georgetown College, Inc., A Body Corporate 331 F.2d 1000 (D.C. Cir. 1964)Google Scholar
16.Boyer, EJ: Obituaries: Spottswood W. Robinson; Lawyer challenged segregation. Los Angeles Times, Oct. 14, 1998Google Scholar
17.Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County, 103 F. Supp. 337, 1952Google Scholar
19.Beauchamp, T, Faden, RR: History of informed consent, meaning and elements of informed consent, paternalism. In Post, S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Bioethics (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan Reference, 2004.Google Scholar
20.Devorah, C: D.C.’s Malpractice magi. The Common Denominator, March 21, 2005. Available at www.thecommondenominator.com/032105_carrie.html Accessed Apr. 25, 2017Google Scholar
21.The Register-Herald.com: Jerry Watson Canterbury, Mar 12, 1939–Mar 15, 2017. Available at http://obituaries.register-herald.com/stories/obituaries/jerry-canterbury-1939-2017-895204172/bc54ccb218554208b926c05f1383 Accessed May 1, 2017Google Scholar
22.Laine, C, Davidoff, F: Patient-centered medicine: A professional evolution. JAMA. 275: 152–3, 1996Google Scholar
23.Truman v. Thomas (165 Cal. Rptr. 308) 1980Google Scholar
24.Kaimowitz v. Michigan DMH (1973), 42 U.S.L.W. 2063 Civil No. 73-1934-AW, 1973Google Scholar
25.Appelbaum, PS, Gutheil, TG: Clinical Handbook of Psychiatry and the Law (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007.Google Scholar
26.American Medical Association, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. 2.1.1 Informed consent. In Code of Medical Ethics of the American Medical Association. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association, 2017. Available at www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/informed-consent Accessed Feb. 4, 2018.Google Scholar
28.For a list of state statutes and holdings as of 2000, see the Appendix in Ketchup v. Howard, 543 S.E.2d 371 (2000) at 381. The actual holding in Ketchup was later reversed (see reference 25)Google Scholar
29.Hutchinson, D: Comment: Marsingill v. O’Malley: The duty to disclose becomes the duty to divine. Alaska Law Rev. 25: 241–61, 2008Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by