Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T09:58:20.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

24 - Associations between Activity Participation across the Life Course and Cognitive Aging

from Part IV - Cognitive, Social, and Biological Factors across the Lifespan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2020

By
Alan J. Gow
Edited by
Ayanna K. Thomas  and
Angela Gutchess
Ayanna K. Thomas
Affiliation:
Tufts University, Massachusetts
Angela Gutchess
Affiliation:
Brandeis University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Participation in activities that provide opportunities for mental, physical, or social engagement have been supported as cognitively protective in later life. Theories propose how mentally stimulating activities might improve or maintain specific cognitive abilities across the life course or reduce age-related cognitive changes, for example, while physical activities might promote brain health via a reduction in cardiovascular risk profiles. Given that such lifestyles and behaviors are potentially modifiable, positive associations between activity participation and maintained cognitive abilities in old age highlight leisure-time pursuits as targets for intervention. However, associations between activity participation and cognitive aging may be prone to reverse causation: those with higher engagement across the life course might have always had higher levels of cognitive ability. Life course approaches are therefore needed to correctly identify the potentially beneficial effects of activity participation. In addition, given the growth and development of cognitive abilities across the life span, there may be specific types of activity or engagement that are beneficial at different points. Understanding the associations between mental, physical, and social activity participation and cognitive aging supports the development of interventions against age-related cognitive decline, ranging from targeted cognitive training programs to broader engagement-based approaches. An ultimate goal of research exploring activity participation and cognitive aging is to provide clear and accurate information to individuals regarding the steps they might take to promote brain health in later life.

Keywords

differential preservationpreserved differentiationreverse causationuse it or lose itenrichment effectscognitive reserveengagementactivityleisure activitycognitive activityphysical activitysocial activitylife courseretrospectiveinterventioncognitive trainingcognitive engagementReligious Orders StudyPATH through Life projectLothian Birth CohortNational Survey of Health and Developmentsynapseexperience Corps
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Aging
A Life Course Perspective
 , pp. 440 - 456
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bielak, A. A. M. (2010). How can we not “lose it” if we still don’t understand how to “use it”? Unanswered questions about the influence of activity participation on cognitive performance in older age – A mini-review. Gerontology, 56, 507–519. doi: 10.1159/000264918Google Scholar
Bielak, A. A. M., Anstey, K. J., Christensen, H., & Windsor, T. D. (2012). Activity engagement is related to level, but not change in cognitive ability across adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 27, 219–228. doi: 10.1037/a0024667Google Scholar
Carlson, M. C., Kuo, J. H., Chuang, Y.-F., et al. (2015). Impact of the Baltimore Experience Corps Trial on cortical and hippocampal volumes. Alzheimer’s and Dementia, 11(11), 1340–1348. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.12.005Google Scholar
Chan, M. Y., Haber, S., Drew, L. M., & Park, D. C. (2014). Training older adults to use tablet computers: Does it enhance cognitive function? Gerontologist, 56(3), 475–484. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu057CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, H., Mackinnon, A., Jorm, A. F., et al. (2004). The Canberra Longitudinal Study: Design, aims, methodology, outcomes and recent empirical investigations. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 11, 169–195. doi: 10.1080/13825580490511053Google Scholar
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310Google Scholar
Erickson, K. I. (2013). Therapeutic effects of exercise on cognitive function. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 61(11), 2038–2039. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12529Google Scholar
Erickson, K. I., Miller, D. L., Weinstein, A. M., Akl, S. L., & Banducci, S. E. (2012). Physical activity and brain plasticity in late adulthood: A conceptual review. Ageing Research, 4, 34–47. doi: 10.4081/ar.2012.e6Google Scholar
Finkel, D., Andel, R., Gatz, M., & Pederson, N. L. (2009). The role of occupational complexity in trajectories of cognitive aging before and after retirement. Psychology and Aging, 24, 563–573. doi: 10.1037/a0015511Google Scholar
Fritsch, T., McClendon, M. J., Smyth, K. A., et al. (2007). Cognitive functioning in healthy aging: The role of reserve and lifestyle factors early in life. Gerontologist, 47, 307–322. doi: 10.1093/geront/47.3.307Google Scholar
Giles, L. C., Glonek, G. F. V., Luszcz, M. A., & Andrews, G. R. (2005). Effect of social networks on 10 year survival in very old Australians: The Australian longitudinal study of aging. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 574–579. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.025429Google Scholar
Gow, A. J., Bastin, M. E., Muñoz Maniega, S., et al. (2012a). Neuroprotective lifestyles and the aging brain: Activity, atrophy and white matter integrity. Neurology, 79, 1802–1808. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182703fd2Google Scholar
Gow, A. J., Bielak, A. A. M., & Gerstorf, D. (2012b). Lifestyle factors and cognitive ageing: Variation across ability and lifestyle domains. Journal of Aging Research, 2012, 1–3. doi: 10.1155/2012/143595Google Scholar
Gow, A. J., Corley, J., Starr, J. M., & Deary, I. J. (2012c). Reverse causation in activity-cognitive ability associations: The Lothian Birth Cohort 1936. Psychology and Aging, 27, 250–255. doi: 10.1037/a0024144Google Scholar
Gow, A. J., Pattie, A., & Deary, I. J. (2017). Lifecourse activity participation from early, mid, and later adulthood as determinants of cognitive aging: The Lothian Birth Cohort 1921. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 72(1), 25–37. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbw124Google Scholar
Hart, C. L., Deary, I. J., Taylor, M. D., et al. (2003). The Scottish Mental Survey 1932 linked to the Midspan studies: A prospective investigation of childhood intelligence and future health. Public Health, 117, 187–195. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(02)00028-8Google Scholar
Hedden, T., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2004). Insights into the ageing mind: A view from cognitive neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 87–96. doi: 10.1038/nrn1323Google Scholar
Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S., & Lindenberger, U. (2008). Enrichment effects on adult cognitive development: Can the functional capacity of older adults be preserved and enhanced? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9, 1–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01034.xGoogle Scholar
James, B. D., Glass, T. A., Caffo, B., et al. (2012). Association of social engagement with brain volumes assessed by structural MRI. Journal of Aging Research, 2012, 1–9. doi: 10.1155/2012/512714Google Scholar
James, B. D., Wilson, R. S., Barnes, L. L., & Bennett, D. A. (2011). Late-life social activity and cognitive decline in old age. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17, 998–1005. doi: 10.1017/S1355617711000531Google Scholar
Klusmann, V., Evers, A., Schwarzer, R., et al. (2010). Complex mental and physical activity in older women and cognitive performance: A 6-month randomized controlled trial. Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 65(6), 680–688. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glq053Google Scholar
Kramer, A. F., Bherer, L., Colcombe, S. J., Dong, W., & Greenough, W. T. (2004). Environmental influences on cognitive and brain plasticity during aging. Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 59, 940–957. doi: 10.1093/gerona/59.9.m940Google Scholar
Kramer, A. F., Colcombe, S. J., McAuley, E., Scalf, P. E., & Erickson, K. I. (2005). Fitness, aging and neurocognitive function. Neurobiology of Aging, 26, 124–127. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.09.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindwall, M., Cimino, C. R., Gibbons, L. E., et al. (2012). Dynamic associations of change in physical activity and change in cognitive function: Coordinated analyses of four longitudinal studies. Journal of Aging Research, 2012, 1–12. doi: 10.1155/2012/493598Google Scholar
Mitchell, M. B., Cimino, C. R., Benitez, A., et al. (2012). Cognitively stimulating activities: Effects on cognition across four studies with up to 21 years of longitudinal data. Journal of Aging Research, 2012, 1–12. doi: 10.1155/2012/461592Google Scholar
Park, D. C., Lodi-Smith, J., Drew, L., et al. (2014). The impact of sustained engagement on cognitive function in older adults: The Synapse Project. Psychological Science, 25, 103–112. doi: 10.1177/0956797613499592Google Scholar
Richards, M., Hardy, R., & Wadsworth, M. E. J. (2003). Does active leisure protect cognition? Evidence from a national birth cohort. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 785–792. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00075-8Google Scholar
Salthouse, T. A. (2006). Mental exercise and mental aging. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 68–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00005.xGoogle Scholar
Salthouse, T. A. (2010). Major issues in cognitive aging. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schaie, K. W. (2013). Developmental influences on adult intelligence: The Seattle Longitudinal Study, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simons, D. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., et al. (2016). Do “brain-training” programs work? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(3), 103–186. doi: 10.1177/1529100616661983Google Scholar
Smart, E. L., Gow, A. J., & Deary, I. J. (2014). Occupational complexity and lifetime cognitive abilities. Neurology, 83(24), 2285–2291. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001075Google Scholar
Tennstedt, S. L., & Unverzagt, F. W. (2013). The ACTIVE study: Study overview and major findings. Journal of Aging and Health, 25, 3–20. doi: 10.1177/0898264313518133Google Scholar
Tucker-Drob, E. M., & Salthouse, T. A. (2011). Individual differences in cognitive aging. In Chamorro-Premuzic, T., von Stumm, S., & Furnham, A. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of individual differences, 1st ed. London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Vaportzis, E., & Gow, A. J. (2018). People’s beliefs and expectations about how cognitive skills change with age: Evidence from a UK-wide aging survey. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 26(7), 797–805. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2018.03.016Google Scholar
Wilson, R. S., Barnes, L. L., & Bennett, D. A. (2003). Assessment of lifetime participation in cognitively stimulating activities. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25, 634–642. doi: 10.1076/jcen.25.5.634.14572Google Scholar
Wilson, R. S., Beckett, L. A., Barnes, L. L., et al. (2002). Individual differences in rates of change in cognitive abilities of older persons. Psychology and Aging, 17, 179–193. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.17.2.179Google Scholar
Wilson, R. S., Bienias, J. L., Evans, D. A., & Bennett, D. A. (2004). Religious Orders Study: Overview and change in cognitive and motor speed. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition, 11, 280–303. doi: 10.1080/13825580490511125Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×