Bakker, Edwin and Pietersma, Hinke, ‘The OSCE in Search of a Meaningful Reform Agenda’, Atlantisch Perspectief 29 No. 7–8 (2005), 23–9.Google Scholar

Brander, Sonya, ‘Making a Credible Case for a Legal Personality for the OSCE’, OSCE Magazine 18 (2009), 18–23.Google Scholar

Brown, Archie, The Gorbachev Factor (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Deudney, Daniel and Ikenberry, John, G. ‘The Unravelling of the Cold War Settlement’, Survival: Global Politics and Strategy 51, No. 6 (2009–2010), 39–62.Google Scholar

Ghebali, Victor-Yves, ‘The OSCEs Istanbul Charter for European Security’, NATO Review 48 No. 1 (2000), 23–6.Google Scholar

Hakkarainen, Petri and Nünlist, Christian, ‘Trust and Realpolitik: The OSCE in 2016’, Policy Perspectives 4, No. 1 (2016).Google Scholar

Kropatcheva, Elena, ‘The Evolution of Russia’s OSCE Policy: From the Promises of the Helsinki Final Act to the Ukrainian Crisis’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies 23 No. 1 (2015), 6–24.Google Scholar

Lehne, Stefan, The CSCE in the 1990s: Common European House or Potemkin Village? (Vienna: Braumüller, 1991).Google Scholar

Lynch, Dov, ‘The State of the OSCE’, The EU-Russia Centre Review: Russia, the OSCE and European Security, No. 12, 5–13.Google Scholar

Maresca, John, To Helsinki: The Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe 1973–1975 (Durham: Duke University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Maresca, John, Helsinki Revisited: A Key U.S. Negotiator’s Memoirs on the Development of the CSCE into the OSCE (Stuttgart: Ibidem, 2016).Google Scholar

Möckli, Daniel, ‘The EC Nine, the CSCE, and the Changing Pattern of European Security’, in Wenger, Andreas, Mastny, Vojtech and Nünlist, Christian (eds.), Origins of the European Security System: The Helsinki Process Revisited, 1965–75 (London: Routledge, 2008), 145–63.Google Scholar

Neukirch, Claus, ‘The Special Monitoring Mission to Ukraine: Operational Challenges and New Horizons’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at University of Hamburged, OSCE Yearbook 2014 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2015), 183–97.Google Scholar

Nünlist, Christian, ‘Expanding the East–West Dialog beyond the Bloc Division: The Neutrals as Negotiators and Mediators’, in Wenger, Andreas, Mastny, Vojtech and Nünlist, Christian (eds.), Origins of the European Security System: The Helsinki Process Revisited, 1965–75 (London: Routledge, 2008), 201–21.Google Scholar

Nünlist, Christian, ‘Helsinki +40 in the Historical Context’, Security and Human Rights 25 (2014), 198–209.Google Scholar

Nünlist, Christian, ‘Contested History: Rebuilding Trust in European Security’, Strategic Trends (2017), 9–32.Google Scholar

Nünlist, Christian, ‘The OSCE and the Future of European Security’, CSS Analyses in Security Policy No. 202 (2017).Google Scholar

Panel of Eminent Persons, Common Purpose: Towards a More Effective OSCE (Vienna: OSCE 2005).Google Scholar

Panel of Eminent Persons, Back to Diplomacy (Vienna: OSCE 2015).Google Scholar

Rey, Marie-Pierre, ‘The USSR and the Helsinki Process, 1969–75: Optimism, Doubt, or Defiance?’, in Wenger, Andreas, Mastny, Vojtech and Nünlist, Christian (eds.), Origins of the European Security System: The Helsinki Process Revisited, 1965–75 (London: Routledge, 2008), 65–81.Google Scholar

Rosin, Philip, Die Schweiz im KSZE-Prozess 1972–1983: Einfluss durch Neutralität (Munich: Oldenbourg, 2014).Google Scholar

Simonet, Loïc and Lüber, Hans Georg, ‘The OSCE and Its Legal Status: Revisiting the Myth of Sisyphus’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at University of Hamburg (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2016 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2017), 277–314.Google Scholar

Snyder, Sarah, Human Rights Activism and the End of the Cold War (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Thomas, Daniel, The Helsinki Effect: International Norms, Human Rights, and the Demise of Communism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Tiilikainen, Teija (ed.), Reviving Co-operative Security in Europe through the OSCE (Vienna: OSCE, 2015).Google Scholar

US Congress, Congressional Record: Proceedings and Debates of the 106th Congress vol. 146, part 7 (Washington: GPO, 2000).Google Scholar

Zagorski, Andrei, ‘The Russian Proposal for a Treaty on European Security: From the Medvedev Initiative to the Corfu Process’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at University of Hamburg (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2009 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2010), 43–59.Google Scholar

Zellner, Wolfgang, ‘Russia and the OSCE: From High Hopes to Disillusionment’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 18 No. 3 (2005), 389–402.Google Scholar

Zellner, Wolfgang, ‘Das OSZE-Gipfeltreffen in Astana im Jahr 2010’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at University of Hamburg (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2010 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2011), 23–31.Google Scholar

Amerasinghe, Chittharanjan, Principles of the Institutional Law of International Organizations 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Arsić-Đapo, Jasna, ‘Another Brick in the Wall: Building Up the OSCE as an International Organization One Agreement at a Time’, International Organisations Law Review 14 (2017), 414–29.Google Scholar

Bekkers, Peter, The Legal Position of Intergovernmental Organizations: A Functional Necessity Analysis of Their Legal Status and Immunities (Dordrecht: TMC Asser Institute, 1996).Google Scholar

Bertrand, Christine, ‘La nature juridique de l’Organisation pour la Sécurité et la Coopération en Europe (OSCE)’, Revue Generale de Droit International Public (April–June 1998), 366–406.Google Scholar

Bloed, Arie, ‘Two Decades of the CSCE Process: From Confrontation to Co-operation’, in Bloed, Arie (ed.), The Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe: Analysis and Basic Documents, 1972–1993 (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993), 1–118.Google Scholar

Bothe, Michael, ‘The Various Dispute Settlement Procedures – General International Law and OSCE Practice’, in Bothe, Michael, Ronzitti, Natalino and Rosas, Allan (eds.), The OSCE in the Maintenance of Peace and Security: Conflict Prevention, Crisis Management and Peaceful Settlement of Disputes (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1997), 367–79.Google Scholar

Bouwhuis, Steven, ‘The International Law Commission’s Definition of International Organizations’, International Organizations Law Review 9 (2012), 451–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burci, Gian Luca, ‘Division of Labour between the UN and the OSCE in connection with Peacekeeping’, in Bothe, Michael, Ronzitti, Natalino and Rosas, Allan (eds.), The OSCE in the Maintenance of Peace and Security: Conflict Prevention, Crisis Management and Peaceful Settlement of Disputes (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1997), 289–313.Google Scholar

Crawford, James, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law 8th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dominicé, Christian, ‘L’émergence de l’individu en droit international public’, in Dominicé, Christian (ed.), L’ordre juridique international entre tradition et innovation (Paris: PUF, 1997), 109–23.Google Scholar

Galbreath, David J. and Brosig, Malte, ‘OSCE’, in Jørgensen, Knud Erik and Laatikainen, Katie Verlin (eds.), Routledge Handbook on the European Union and International Institutions: Performance, Policy, Power (London: Routledge, 2013), 271–81.Google Scholar

Gautier, Philippe, ‘Accord et engagement politique en droit des gens a propose de l’Acte fondateur sur les relations, la coopération et la sécurité mutuelles entre l’OTAN et la Fédération de Russie, signe à Paris le 27 mai 1997’, Annuaire Français de Droit International XLIII (1997), 82–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gazzini, Tarcisio, ‘Personality of International Organisations’, in Klabbers, Jan and Wallendahl, Åsa (eds.), Research Handbook on the Law of International Organisations (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011), 33–53.Google Scholar

Hafner, Gerhard, ‘Did the FR Yugoslavia Make the OSCE an International Organization?’, in Benedek, Wolfgang, Isak, Hubert and Kicker, Renate (eds.), Development and Developing International and European Law: Essays in Honour of Konrad Ginther on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1999), 35–57.Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems & Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Hirsch, Christian, ‘OSCE Legal Personality: Implications for Field Operations’, OSCE Legal Digest (2016–2017).Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, An Introduction to International Organizations Law 3rd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘Institutional Ambivalence by Design: Soft Organizations in International Law’, Nordic Journal of International Law 70 (2001), 403–21.Google Scholar

Lohmann, Torsten, ‘Dispute Settlement Procedures in the OSCE – Genesis and Overview’, in Bothe, Michael, Ronzitti, Natalino and Rosas, Allan (eds.), The OSCE in the Maintenance of Peace and Security: Conflict Prevention, Crisis Management and Peaceful Settlement of Disputes (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1997), 343–56.Google Scholar

Odello, Marco, ‘The Developing Legal Status of the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe’, Anuario Espanol de Derecho Internacional XXII (2006), 351–93.Google Scholar

Odello, Marco, ‘The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe and European Security Law’, in Trybus, Martin and White, Nigel (eds.), European Security Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), 295–328.Google Scholar

Martha, Rutsel, The Legal Foundations of Interpol (Oxford: Hart, 2010).Google Scholar

Peters, Anne, Beyond Human Rights (Cambridge: CUP 2016).Google Scholar

Peters, Ingo, ‘Legitimacy and International Organizations – The Case of the OSCE’, in Zaum, Dominik (ed.), Legitimating International Organizations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 196–220.Google Scholar

Portmann, Ronald, Legal Personality in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Rama-Montaldo, Manuel, ‘International Legal Personality and Implied Powers of International Organizations’, British Yearbook of International Law 44 (1970), 111–55.Google Scholar

Ronzitti, Natalino, ‘OSCE Peacekeeping’, in Bothe, Michael, Ronzitti, Natalino and Rosas, Allan (eds.), The OSCE in the Maintenance of Peace and Security: Conflict Prevention, Crisis Management and Peaceful Settlement of Disputes (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1997), 237–55.Google Scholar

Sands, Philippe and Klein, Pierre, Bowett’s Law of International Institutions (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2001).Google Scholar

Sapiro, Miriam, ‘Changing the CSCE into the OSCE: Legal Aspects of a Political Transformation’, American Journal of International Law 89 (1995), 631–7.Google Scholar

Schlager, Erika, ‘A Hard Look at Compliance with “Soft” Law: The Case of the OSCE’, in Shelton, Dinah (ed.), Commitment and Compliance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 346–72.Google Scholar

Schweisfurth, Theodor, ‘Die juristische Mutation der KSZE: Eine internationale Organisation in statu nascendi’, in Beyerlin, Ulrich, Bothe, Michael, Hofmann, Rainer and Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich. (eds.), Recht zwischen Umbruch und Bewahrung: Festschrift fűr Rudolf Bernhardt (Berlin: Springer, 1995), 213–28.Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, A New World Order (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Smouts, Marie, ‘Les suites institutionnelles de la Conférence sur la Sécurité et la Coopération en Europe’, Revue Française de Science Politique 24 (1974), 1230–6.Google Scholar

Stribis, Ioannis, ‘Operational Update: Lack of Clarity of the Status of the OSCE: Impact on Project Implementation,’ SEC.GAL/204/15, 15 July 2015.Google Scholar

Tabassi, Lisa, ‘Operational Update: Legal Aspects of OSCE Peace Operations,’ SEC.GAL/205/15, 5 October 2015.Google Scholar

Tabassi, Lisa, ‘Operational Update: Legal Liability for Patrolling/Monitoring; Crisis Response; Tax Exemption’, SEC.GAL/159/16, 19 October 2016.Google Scholar

Tabassi, Lisa, ‘Update on the Operational Consequences of the Lack of a Clear Legal Status of the OSCE’, SEC.GAL/26/17, 10 February 2017.Google Scholar

Tichy, Helmut and Quidenus, Catherine, ‘Consolidating the International Legal Personality of the OSCE: A Headquarters Agreement with Austria’, International Organizations Law Review 14 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomuschat, Christian, ‘Ensuring the Survival of Mankind on the Eve of a New Century’, Recueil de Cours 1999 281, Académie de Droit International de La Haye (The Hague, Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff, 1999) 9–438.Google Scholar

White, Nigel, The Law of International Organisations (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Wood, Michael, ‘The Immunity of Official Visitors’, in von Bogdandy, Armin and Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds.), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 16 (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2012), 35–98.Google Scholar

Wood, Michael, ‘Do International Organizations Enjoy Immunity Under Customary International Law?’, International Organizations Law Review 10 (2013), 287–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhun, Victoriya, ‘Operational Aspects of Patrolling/Monitoring: A Legal Perspective’, OSCE Legal Digest (2015–2016).Google Scholar

Brander, Sonya, ‘Making a Credible Case for a Legal Personality for the OSCE’, OSCE Magazine (March–April 2009), 18–22.Google Scholar

Georgiev, Dencho, ‘The Collapse of Totalitarian Regimes in Eastern Europe and the International Rule of Law’, in Krygiwer, Martin and Czarnota, Adam (eds.), The Rule of Law after Communism: Problems and Prospects in East-Central Europe (Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Co., 1999), 329–44.Google Scholar

Grünigen, Marianne von and Renk, Hans-Jörg, ‘Forty Years of the Helsinki Final Act – A Cause for Celebration?’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2014 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2015), 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hafner, Gerhard, ‘The Legal Personality of International Organizations’, in Reinisch, August and Kriebaum, Ursula (eds.), The Law of International Relations, Liber Amicorum Hanspeter Neuhold (Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing, 2007), 81–100.Google Scholar

Novak, Gregor, Hafner, Gerhard and Prantner, Helmut, ‘Austrian Diplomatic and Parliamentary Practice in International Law’, Austrian Review of International and European Law 12 (2007), 293–436.Google Scholar

Oberschmidt, Randolf and Zellner, Wolfgang, ‘OSCE at the Crossroads, Working Paper 2’, in WP Core Working Papers (Hamburg: Centre for OSCE Research, Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg, 2000).Google Scholar

Simonet, Loïc and Lüber, Hans Georg, ‘The OSCE and Its Legal Status: Revising the Myth of Sisyphus’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg (eds), OSCE Yearbook 2016 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2017), 277–314.Google Scholar

Schimmelfennig, Frank, Engert, Stefan and Knobel, Heiko, International Socialization in Europe, European Organizations, Political Conditionality and Democratic Change (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).Google Scholar

Tichy, Helmut, Schusterschitz, Gregor and Bittner, Philip, ‘Recent Austrian Practice in the Field of International Law: Report for 2011’, Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 67 (2012), 157–99.Google Scholar

Tichy, Helmut and Köhler, Ulrike ‘Legal Personality or Not – The Recent Attempts to Improve the Status of the OSCE’, in Crawford, James, Pellet, Allain, Buffard, Isabelle and Wittich, Stefan (eds.), International Law Between Universalism and Fragmentation – Festschrift in Honour of Gerhard Hafner (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008), 455–78.Google Scholar

Van Veldhuizen-Rothenbücher, Ida, ‘Legal personality of the OSCE: Quo vadis?’, OSCE Magazine (March–April 2009), 23.Google Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth, Keohane, Robert, Moravcsik, Andrew, Slaughter, Anne-Marie and Snidal, Duncan, ‘The Concept of Legalization’, International Organization 54 (3) (2000), 385–99.Google Scholar

Bahr, Egon, Sicherheit für und vor Deutschland (Munich, Vienna: Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, 1991).Google Scholar

Bahr, Egon, ‘Germany’s Ostpolitik and the Road to Helsinki’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg (eds.), OSCE Yearbook 2005 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2005).Google Scholar

Bogush, Gleb, ‘OSCE: Do We Really Need an International Legal Personality and Why?’, Völkerrechtsblog 15 August 2016, available at: http://voelkerrechtsblog.org/osce-do-we-really-need-an-international-legal-personality-and-why/.Google Scholar

Börzel, Tanja and Schimmelfennig, Frank, ‘Coming Together or Drifting Apart? The EU’s Political Integration Capacity in Eastern Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy 24 (2) (2017), 278–96.Google Scholar

Brander, Sonya, ‘Making a Credible Case for a Legal Personality for the OSCE’, OSCE Magazine (March–April 2009), 18–22.Google Scholar

Brander, Sonya and Estébanez, María Martín, ‘The OSCE Matures: Time for Legal Status’, Helsinki Monitor 18 (1) (2007), 2–5.Google Scholar

Brichambaut, Marc Perrin de, ‘The OSCE and the 21st Century’, Helsinki Monitor: Security and Human Rights 18 (3) (2007), 180–91.Google Scholar

Deutscher Bundestag, ‘Initiativen für Abrüstung, Rüstungskontrolle und vertrauensbildende Maßnahmen unter dem OSZE-Vorsitz Deutschlands, Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die kleine Anfrage der Abgeordneten Katrin Kunert, Wolfgang Ehrcke, Christine Buchholz, weiterer Abgeordneter und der Franktion DIE LINKE’, Bundestag Drucksache 18/9795, 2016.Google Scholar

Dominguez, Roberto (ed.), The OSCE. Soft Security for a Hard World: Competing Theories for Understanding the OSCE (Brussels: P. I. E. Peter Lang, 2014).Google Scholar

Dunay, Pál, ‘The OSCE in Crisis’, in EU Institute for Security Studies, Chaillot Paper No. 88 (Paris: 2006).Google Scholar

Fastenrath, Ulrich, ‘The Legal Significance of CSCE/OSCE Documents’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at University of Hamburg (eds.), OSCE Yearbook 1996 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft 1996).Google Scholar

Fastenrath, Ulrich and Weigelt, Katja, ‘Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE)’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. VII (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Flynn, Gregory and Farell, Henry, ‘The CSCE and the “Construction” of Security in Post-Cold War Europe’, International Organization 53 (3) (1999), 505–35.Google Scholar

Ghébali, Victor-Yves, ‘The Reform Process of the OSCE since the 2001 Bucharest Ministerial Decisions’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at University of Hamburg (eds.), OSCE Yearbook 2002 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2002), 329–36.Google Scholar

Ghébali, Victor-Yves, ‘Growing Pains at the OSCE: The Rise and Fall of Russia’s Pan-European Expectations’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 18 (3) (2005), 375–88.Google Scholar

Gilpin, Robert, War and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Heintze, Hans-Joachim, ‘Double or Treble Human Rights Protection? The Interplay of OSCE Standards with Other Systems of Norms’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at University of Hamburg (eds.), OSCE Yearbook 2006 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2006), 237–49.Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence and Slaughter, Anne-Marie, ‘Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication’, Yale Law Journal 107 (2) (1997), 273–391.Google Scholar

Héritier, Adrienne and Rhodes, Martin (eds.), New Modes of Governance in Europe, Governing in the Shadow of Hierarchy (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).Google Scholar

Kahler, Miles, ‘Conclusion: The Causes and Consequences of Legalization’, International Organization 54 (3) (2000), 661–83.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert, ‘Neoliberal Institutionalism: A Perspective on World Politics’, in Keohane, Robert (ed.), International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory (Boulder: Westview Press, 1989), 1–20.Google Scholar

Kirchner, Emil and Dominguez, Roberto, The Security Governance of Regional Organizations. vol. 58 (Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar

Klein, Margarete, ‘Russia’s Plan for a New Pan-European Security Regime: A Serious Proposal or an Attempt at Division?’, Russian Analytical Digest 55 (2009), 6–9.Google Scholar

Krahmann, Elke, ‘Conceptualizing Security Governance’, Cooperation and Conflict 38 (1) (2009), 5–26.Google Scholar

Ley, Isabelle, ‘Legal Personality for the OSCE? Some Observations at the Occasion of the Recent Conference on the Legal Status of the OSCE’, Völkerrechtsblog, 8 August 2016, available at: http://voelkerrechtsblog.org/legal-personality-for-the-osce/.Google Scholar

Manton, Eric, ‘The OSCE Human Dimension and Customary International Law Formation’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg (eds.), OSCE Yearbook 2005 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2004), 1–20.Google Scholar

Martin, Lisa, ‘The Rational State Choice of Multilateralism’, in Ruggie, John Gerard (ed.), Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), 91–121.Google Scholar

Marxsen, Christian, ‘Territorial Integrity in International Law – Its Concept and Implications for Crimea’, Zeitschrift für ausländisches öfentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (Heidelberg Journal of International Law) 75 (1) (2015), 7–26.Google Scholar

Marxsen, Christian, ‘International Law in Crisis: Russia’s Struggle for Recognition’, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law (ed.), MPIL Research Paper Series No. 2016–05 (Heidelberg, 2016), available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2771293.Google Scholar

OSCE, ‘Draft Decision on the Charter of the OSCE: Submitted by Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Russian Federation, Tajikistan’, PC.DEL/897/07, 18 September 2007.Google Scholar

Peters, Ingo, ‘From the CSCE to the OSCE – Institutional Quality and Political Meaning’, in Peters, Ingo (ed.), New Security Challenges: The Adaptation of International Institutions. Reforming the UN, NATO, EU and CSCE since 1989 (Münster, New York: Lit Verlag, St. Martin’s Press, 1996), 85–122.Google Scholar

Peters, Ingo, ‘Von der KSZE zur OSZE: überleben in der Nische kooperativer Sicherheit’, in Haftendorn, Helga and Keck, Otto (eds.), Kooperation jenseits von Hegemonie und Bedrohung, Sicherheitsinstitutionen in den internationalen Beziehungen (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1997), 57–100.Google Scholar

Peters, Ingo, ‘The OSCE, NATO and the EU within the “Network of Interlocking European Security Institutions”: Hierarchization, Flexibilization, Marginalization’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg (eds.), OSCE Yearbook 2003 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2004), 381–402.Google Scholar

Peters, Ingo, ‘Legitimacy and International Organizations: The Case of the OSCE’, in Zaum, Dominik (ed.), Legitimacy and International Organizations (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2013), 196–220.Google Scholar

Sabel, Charles and Zeitlin, Jonathan (eds.), Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Sapiro, Miriam, ‘Changing the CSCE into the OSCE: Legal Aspects of a Political Transformation’, American Journal of International Law 89 (3) (1995), 631–7.Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah, ‘Soft Law’, in Armstrong, David (ed.), Routledge Handbook of International Law (Abingdon: Routledge Press, 2009), 68–81.Google Scholar

Smith, Christopher, ‘Kazakhstan’s Candidacy for OSCE Chairmanship’, US House of Representatives: Proceedings of the 109th Congress, 2nd Session, Congressional Record 152 (2006), 29 June 2006, 87.Google Scholar

Steinmeier, Frank-Walter, ‘Interview with the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office, German Federal Minister for Foreign Affairs’, Security Community, OSCE Magazine (2015), 3–4.Google Scholar

Tabassi, Lisa, ‘The Question of Legal Status for the OSCE and Implications for Ukraine’, 27 April 2015, available at: www.oscepa.org/documents/all-documents/helsinki-40/seminar-4-diis/2919-presentation-by-lisa-tabassi-for-helsinki-40-seminar-27-april-2015/file.Google Scholar

Tallberg, Jonas, ‘Paths to Compliance. Enforcement, Management, and the European Union’, International Organization 56 (3) (2002), 609–43.Google Scholar

Tichy, Helmut and Köhler, Ulrike, ‘Legal Personality or Not – The Recent Attempts to Improve the Status of the OSCE’, in Buffard, Isabelle, Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Wittich, Stephan (eds.), International Law Between Universalism and Fragmentation: Festschrift in Honour of Gerhard Hafner (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), 455–78.Google Scholar

Tillikainen, Teija, ‘Reviving Co-operative Security in Europe through the OSCE’, Contribution of the OSCE Network of Think Tanks and Academic Institutions to the Panel of Eminent Persons (2015), available at: www.fiia.fi/assets/news/Reviving%20Co-operative%20Security%20in%20Europe%20through%20the%20OSCE.pdf.Google Scholar

Tomuschat, Christian, ‘Legalization of the OSCE?’, Völkerrechtsblog, 1 August 2016, available at: http://voelkerrechtsblog.org/legalization-of-the-osce/.Google Scholar

Waltz, Kenneth, Theory of International Politics (Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1979).Google Scholar

Wenig, Marcus, ‘The Status of the OSCE Under International Law – Current Status and Outlook, III. Organizational Aspects’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at University of Hamburg (eds.), OSCE Yearbook 1997 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1997), 367–83.Google Scholar

Zanotti, Laura, ‘Post-Structuralism: Soft Power as Governmentality and Normalization in the OSCE’s Role in Croatia’, in Dominguez, Roberto (ed.), The OSCE Soft Security for a Hard World: Competing Theories for Understanding the OSCE (Brussels: P. I. E. Peter Lang, 2014), 93–110.Google Scholar

Zellner, Wolfgang, ‘Managing Change in Europe. Evaluating the OSCE and Its Future Role: Competencies, Capabilities, and Missions’, Working Paper 13, in WP Core Working Papers (Hamburg: Centre for OSCE Research, Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg, 2005).Google Scholar

Zürn, Michael, Interessen und Institutionen in der internationalen Politik: Grundlegung und Anwendung des situationsstrukturellen Ansatzes (Opladen: Leske+Budrich, 1992).Google Scholar

Belov, Sergey, ‘Tsennostnoe obosnovanie reshenii kak proyavlenie sudebnogo aktivizma Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii’ (‘The Value-based Approach to the Argumentation as a Form of Judicial Activism of the Russian Constitutional Court’), Sravnitel’noe Konstitutsionnoe Obozreniye 2 (2012), 140–50.Google Scholar

Danilenko, Gennady, ‘Implementation of International Law in CIS States: Theory and Practice’, European Journal of International Law 10 (1999), 51–69.Google Scholar

Ignatenko, Gennadij, Tiunov, Oleg and Bezborodov, Jiurij, Mezhdunarodnoe pravo (International Law)(Moscow: Norma, 2014).Google Scholar

Kurdyukov, Gennady and Makarova, Galina, Rol’ organizatsii po bezopasnosti i sotrudnichestvu v Yevrope (OBSE/SBSE) v razvitii mirovogo politicheskogo protsessa na rubezhe XXI veka (The Role of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe in the Development of the World Political Process at the Turn of XXI Century) (Kazan, 2008).Google Scholar

Lazarev, Valerij (ed.), Kommentariy k Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii (Commentary to the Constitution of the Russian Federation) 3rd edn (Moscow: Prospekt, 2008).Google Scholar

Lukashuk, Igor, Mezhdunarodnoe pravo Osobennaya chast (International Law: Special Part), 3rd edn (Moscow: Wolters Kluwer, 2008).Google Scholar

Mälksoo, Lauri, ‘Russia’s Constitutional Court Defies the European Court of Human Rights: Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation Judgment of 14 July 2015, No 21-П/2015’, European Constitutional Law Review 12 (2) (2016), 377–95.Google Scholar

Mälksoo, Lauri, Russian Approaches to International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Malinin, Sergei, ‘Izbrannoe’ (Selected Works) (Saint Petersburg: Yuridicheskiy Tsentr Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Mestnikov, Viktor, ‘Problemy statusa i deyatel’nosti Organizatsii po bezopasnosti i sotrudnichestvu v Yevrope (OBSE)’, Dissertatsiya na soiskaniye uchonoy stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk (‘Problems of Status and Activity of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe’), unpublished PhD thesis, 2005.Google Scholar

Nuzov, Ilya, ‘National Ratification of an Internationally Wrongful Act: The Decision Validating and Russia’s Incorporation of Crimea: Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, Decision of 19 March 2014, No. 6-P’, European Constitutional Law Review 12 (2) (2016), 353–76.Google Scholar

Shibaeva, Elena, Pravo mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii (Law of International Organizations) (Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1986).Google Scholar

Tichy, Helmut and Köhler, Ulrike, ‘Legal Personality or Not – The Recent Attempts to Improve the Status of the OSCE’, in Buffard, Isabelle, Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Wittich, Stephan (eds.), International Law between Universalism and Fragmentation: Festschrift in Honour of Gerhard Hafner (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008), 455–78.Google Scholar

Zagorskiy, Andrei and Entin, Mark, ‘Zachem ukhodit iz OBSE?’ (Why leave the OSCE?), Rossiya v global’noy politike 4 (July–August 2008).Google Scholar

Zorkin, Valerij (ed.), Kommentariy k Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii (Commentary to the Constitution of the Russian Federation) (Moscow: Norma, 2013).Google Scholar