Altenhoener, Charlotte and Palermo, Francesco, ‘Civil Society Contributions to the Work of the OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities’, International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 18 (2) (2011), 201–18.Google Scholar

Andersen, Elizabeth, ‘The OSCE and Human Rights Watch: From Norm-Setting to Implementation and Enforcement’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2000 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2001), 391–401.Google Scholar

Beqiraj, Julinda, ‘The OSCE: The Difficult Path of Survival’, The Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations 13 (2) (2012), 45–61.Google Scholar

Berger, Christian, ‘OSCE and International Law’, International Journal of Legal Information 24 (1) (1996), 36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berman, Ayelet, Duquet, Sanderijn, Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses and Wouters, Jan (eds.), Informal International Lawmaking: Case Studies, Law of the Future Series 3 (The Hague: Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, 2012).Google Scholar

Bloed, Arie (ed.), The Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe: Analysis and Basic Documents, 1972–1993 (Dordrecht, Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993).Google Scholar

Bloed, Arie, ‘OSCE Chronicle’, Security and Human Rights 25 (1) (2014), 145–51.Google Scholar

Bloed, Arie, ‘OSCE Principles: Which Principles?’, Security and Human Rights 25 (2) (2014), 210–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchsbaum, Thomas, ‘The 1993 Session of the CSCE Parliamentary Assembly’, Helsinki Monitor 4 (4) (1993), 26–35.Google Scholar

Chinkin, Christine, ‘Normative Development in the International Legal System’, in Shelton, Dinah (ed.), Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 21–42.Google Scholar

Degn, Helle, ‘The OSCE Parliamentary Assembly – Growth in Recent Years’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2001 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2002), 365–72.Google Scholar

Di Stasi, Angela, ‘About Soft Law Organizations: An Open Question’, in Virzo, Roberto and Ingravallo, Ivan (eds.), Evolutions in the Law of International Organizations, Legal Aspects of International Organizations, vol. 54 (Leiden, Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2015), 44–69.Google Scholar

Farahat, Anuscheh, ‘Regulating Minority Issues through Standard-Setting and Mediation: The Case of the High Commissioner on National Minorities’, German Law Journal 9 (11) (2008), 1453–80.Google Scholar

Fastenrath, Ulrich, ‘The Legal Significance of CSCE/OSCE Documents’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 1996 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1997), 411–27.Google Scholar

Galbreath, David, The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) (New York: Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar

Ghébali, Victor-Yves, ‘The Contribution of the Istanbul Document 1999 to European Security and Co-operation’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2000 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2001), 289–305.Google Scholar

Habegger, Beat, ‘Democratic Accountability of International Organizations: Parliamentary Control within the Council of Europe and the OSCE and the Prospects for the United Nations’, Cooperation and Conflict 45 (2) (2010), 186–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habegger, Beat, ‘Democratic Control of the OSCE: The Role of the Parliamentary Assembly’, Helsinki Monitor 17 (2) (2006), 133–43.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘Institutional Ambivalence by Design: Soft Organizations in International Law’, Nordic Journal of International Law 70 Issue 3 (2001), 403–21.Google Scholar

Manton, Eric, ‘The OSCE Human Dimension and Customary International Law Formation’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2005 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2006), 1–20.Google Scholar

Nothelle, Andreas, ‘The OSCE Parliamentary Assembly – Driving Reform’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2006 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2007), 347–73.Google Scholar

O’Connell, Mary Ellen, ‘The Role of Soft Law in a Global Order’, in Shelton, Dinah (ed.), Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 100–14.Google Scholar

Packer, John, ‘Making International Law Matter in Preventing Ethnic Conflict: A Practitioner’s Perspective’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 32 (2000), 715–24.Google Scholar

Paunov, Dimitar, ‘Assessing the Success of EU–OSCE Cooperation: A Case of Mutualism?’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2015 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2016), 339–52.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost ‘Informal International Lawmaking: Framing the Concept and Research Questions’, in Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses and Wouters, Jan (eds.), Informal International Lawmaking (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2012), 13–34.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, Ramses, Wessel and Jan, Wouters, ‘Informal International Lawmaking: An Assessment and Template to Keep It Both Effective and Accountable’, in Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses and Wouters, Jan (eds.), Informal International Lawmaking (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2012), 500–38.Google Scholar

Peters, Anne, Koechlin, Lucy, Förster, Till and Fenner Zinkernagel, Gretta (eds.), Non-State Actors as Standard Setters (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ratner, Steven, ‘Does International Law Matter in Preventing Ethnic Conflict?’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 32 (2000), 591–698.Google Scholar

Reisman, Michael, ‘The Concept and Functions of Soft Law in International Politics’, in Bello, Emmanuel and Ajibola S. A. N, Bola A.. (eds.), Essays in Honour of Judge Taslim Olawale Elias, Contemporary International Law and Human Rights, vol. 1 (Dordrecht; Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1992), 135–44.Google Scholar

Schlager, Erika, ‘A Hard Look at Compliance with “Soft” Law: The Case of the OSCE’, in Shelton, Dinah (ed.), Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 346–71.Google Scholar

Schweisfurth, Theodor, ‘Die juristische Mutation der KSZE: eine internationale Organisation in statu nascendi’, in Beyerlin, Ulrich, Bothe, Michael, Rainer, Hofmann and Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (eds.), Recht zwischen Umbruch und Bewahrung: Festschrift für Rudolf Bernhardt (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1995), 213–28.Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah, ‘Commentary and Conclusions’, in Shelton, Dinah (ed.), Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 449–61.Google Scholar

Tudyka, Kurt, ‘Non-Governmental Organizations and the OSCE’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2001 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2002), 465–74.Google Scholar

Ulfstein, Geir, ‘Institutions and Competences’, in Klabbers, Jan, Peters, Anne and Ulfstein, Geir (eds.), The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Willigen, Niels van, ‘Effective Multilateralism Between Unequal Partners: The EU in the OSCE’, in Drieskens, Edith and van Schaik, Louise G. (eds.), The EU and Effective Multilateralism: Internal and External Reform Practices, Routledge Studies in European Security and Strategy (London, New York: Routledge, 2014), 136–52.Google Scholar

Wouters, Jan and Hamid, Linda, ‘Custom and Informal International Lawmaking’, in Bradley, Curtis (ed.), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016), 332–59.Google Scholar

Zannier, Lamberto, ‘Strength in Numbers: Co-operating with Other International Organizations’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2012 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2013), 383–90.Google Scholar

Zannier, Lamberto, ‘The OSCE and Chapter VIII of the United Nations Charter – Contributing to Global Peace and Security’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2014 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2015), 97–109.Google Scholar

Zellner, Wolfgang, ‘The OSCE Network of Think Thanks and Academic Institutions: Baby Steps’, in Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2013 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2014), 269–75.Google Scholar

Barbé, Esther and Herranz Surralés, Anna, ‘The Power and Practice of the European Parliament in Security Policies’, in Peters, Dirk, Wagner, Wolfgang and Deitelhoff, Nicole (eds.), The Parliamentary Control of European Security Policy (Oslo: ARENA, 2008), 77–107.Google Scholar

Berman, Ayelet and Wessel, Ramses A., ‘The International Legal Form and Status of Informal International Lawmaking Bodies: Consequences for Accountability’, in Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses A. and Wouters, Jan (eds.), Informal International Lawmaking (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 35–61.Google Scholar

Blokker, Niels, ‘Proliferation of International Organizations: An Exploratory Introduction’, in Blokker, Niels and Schermers, Henry (eds.), Proliferation of International Organizations: Legal Issues (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2001), 1–49.Google Scholar

Bogdandy, Armin von, Dann, Philipp and Goldmann, Matthias, ‘Developing the Publicness of Public International Law: Towards a Legal Framework for Global Governance Activities’, in von Bogdandy, Armin, Wolfrum, Rüdiger, von Bernstorff, Jochen, Dann, Philipp and Goldmann, Matthias (eds.), The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions: Advancing International Institutional Law (Heidelberg: Springer, 2010), 3–32.Google Scholar

Bovens, Mark, ‘Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework’, European Law Journal 13 (2007), 447–68.Google Scholar

Bovens, Mark, ‘Two Concepts of Accountability: Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism’, West European Politics 33 (2010), 946–67.Google Scholar

Bovens, Mark, Curtin, Deirdre and ‘t Hart, Paul, ‘Studying the Real World of EU Accountability: Framework and Design’, in Bovens, Mark, Curtin, Deirdre and ‘t Hart, Paul (eds.), The Real World of EU Accountability (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2010), 31–62.Google Scholar

Bovens, Mark, Schillemans, Thomas and Goodin, Robert E., ‘Public Accountability’, in Bovens, Mark, Goodin, Robert E. and Schillemans, Thomas (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2014), 1–20.Google Scholar

Busuioc, Madalina E. and Lodge, Martin, ‘The Reputational Basis of Public Accountability’, Governance 29 (2015), 247–63.Google Scholar

Curtin, Deirdre, ‘Holding (Quasi-)Autonomous EU Administrative Actors to Public Account’, European Law Journal 13 (2007), 523–41.Google Scholar

Curtin, Deirdre, Papadopolous, Yannis and Peter, Mair, ‘Positioning Accountability in European Governance: An Introduction’, West European Politics 33 (2010), 929–45.Google Scholar

Curtin, Deirdre and Nollkaemper, André, ‘Conceptualizing Accountability in International and European Law’, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 36 (2005), 3–20.Google Scholar

Dann, Philipp, ‘Accountability in Development Aid Law: The World Bank, UNDP and Emerging Structures of Transnational Oversight’, Archiv Des Völkerrechts 44 (2006), 381–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daugirdas, Kristina, ‘Reputation and the Responsibility of International Organizations’, European Journal of International Law 25 (2015), 991–1018.Google Scholar

Dekker, Ige F., ‘Making Sense of Accountability in International Institutional Law’, Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 36 (2005), 83–118.Google Scholar

Dyrberg, Peter, ‘Accountability and Legitimacy: What is the Contribution of Transparency’, in Arnull, Anthony and Wincott, Daniel (eds.), Accountability and Legitimacy in the European Union (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), 81–96.Google Scholar

Farrall, Jeremy M., ‘Rule of Accountability or Rule of Law? Regulating the UN Security Council’s Accountability Deficits’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law 19 (2014), 389–408.Google Scholar

Fastenrath, Ulrich and Weigelt, Katja, ‘Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE)’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), VII: 1040–55.Google Scholar

Fisher, Elizabeth, ‘The European Union in the Age of Accountability’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 24 (2004), 495–515.Google Scholar

Grant, Ruth W. and Keohane, Robert O., ‘Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics’, American Political Science Review 99 (2005), 29–43.Google Scholar

Harlow, Carol, ‘Accountability and Constitutional Law’, in Bovens, Mark, Goodin, Robert E. and Schillemans, Thomas (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2014), 195–210.Google Scholar

Harlow, Carol, Accountability in the European Union (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Henderson, Christian, ‘Authority without Accountability? The UN Security Council’s Authorization Method and Institutional Mechanisms of Accountability’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law 19 (2014), 489–509.Google Scholar

Huff, Ariella, ‘Problems and Patterns in Parliamentary Scrutiny of the CFSP and CSDP’, OPAL Online Paper Series 14 (2013), 1–28.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O., ‘Accountability in World Politics’, Scandinavian Political Studies 29 (2006), 75–87.Google Scholar

Keohane, Robert O., ‘Global Governance and Democratic Accountability’, Miliband Lecture at the London School of Economics and Political Science, 17 May 2002.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico and Steward, Richard B., ‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law’, Law and Contemporary Problems 68 (2005), 15–61.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘Institutional Ambivalence by Design: Soft Organizations in International Law’, Nordic Journal of International Law 70 (2001), 403–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moravcsik, Andrew, ‘Why the European Union Strengthens the State: Domestic Politics and International Cooperation’, Working Paper 52, in CES Working Paper Series (Harvard University: Centre for European Studies, 1994), 1–78.Google Scholar

Moser, Carolyn, EU Civilian Crisis Management – Law and Practice of Accountability (Utrecht: Utrecht University, 2018)Google Scholar

Mulgan, Richard, ‘“Accountability”: An Ever-Expanding Concept?’, Public Administration 78 (2000), 555–73.Google Scholar

Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina, ‘Contextual Choices in Fighting Corruption: Lessons Learned’, Study Report 4/2011, Oslo: Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD), 2011.Google Scholar

Nothelle, Andreas, ‘The Parliamentary Assembly: Driving Reform’, in University of Hamburg, Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2006 (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2007), 347–73.Google Scholar

Nye, Joseph S., Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (New York: PublicAffairs, 2004).Google Scholar

Papadopolous, Yannis, ‘Problems of Democratic Accountability in Network and Multilevel Governance’, European Law Journal 13 (2007), 469–86.Google Scholar

Patil, Shefali V., Vieider, Ferdinand and Tetlock, Philip E., ‘Process versus Outcome Accountability’, in Bovens, Mark, Goodin, Robert E. and Schillemans, Thomas (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2014), 69–89.Google Scholar

Reinisch, August, ‘Securing the Accountability of International Organizations’, Global Governance 7 (2001), 131–49.Google Scholar

Rosén, Guri, ‘EU Confidential: The European Parliament’s Involvement in EU Security and Defence Policy’, Journal of Common Market Studies 53 (2015), 383–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenau, James N., ‘Change, Complexity, and Governance in Globalizing Space’, in Pierre, Jon (ed.), Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 167–200.Google Scholar

Rosenau, James N., ‘Governance in the Twenty-First Century’, Global Governance 1 (1995), 13–43.Google Scholar

Schedler, Andreas, ‘Conceptualizing Accountability’, in Schedler, Andreas, Diamond, Larry and Plattner, Marc F. (eds.), The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies (London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1999), 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tan, Celine, ‘Mandating Rights and Limiting Mission Creep: Holding the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund Accountable for Human Rights Violations’, Human Rights and International Legal Discourse 2 (2008), 79–116.Google Scholar

Thompson, Dennis F., ‘Moral Responsibility of Public Officials: The Problem of Many Hands’, American Political Science Review 74 (1980), 905–16.Google Scholar

Tichy, Helmut and Köhler, Ulrike, ‘Legal Personality or Not – The Recent Attempts to Improve the Status of the OSCE’, in Buffard, Isabelle, Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain and Wittich, Stephan (eds.), International Law between Universalism and Fragmentation: Festschrift in Honour of Gerhard Hafner (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008), 455–78.Google Scholar

Whitman, Richard G., ‘Norms, Power and Europe: A New Agenda for Study of the EU and International Relations’, in Whitman, Richard G. (ed.), Normative Power Europe: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives (Houndsmills, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), 1–22.Google Scholar

Wincott, Daniel, ‘The Governance White Paper, the Commission and the Search for Legitimacy’, in Arnull, Anthony and Wincott, Daniel (eds.), Accountability and Legitimacy in the European Union (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), 379–98.Google Scholar

Zyl, Albert van, ‘How Civil Society Organizations Close the Gap between Transparency and Accountability’, Governance 27 (2014), 347–56.Google Scholar

Abbott, Kenneth W. and Duncan, Snidal, ‘Why States Act through Formal International Organizations’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (1998), 3–32.Google Scholar

Alebeek, Rosanne van, ‘Stitching Mothers of Srebrenica and Others v Netherlands and United Nations, Final appeal judgment, LJN: BW1999, ILDC 1760 (NL 2012), 13th April 2012, Netherlands; Supreme Court [HR]’, Oxford Reports on International Law in Domestic Courts (2012).Google Scholar

Barros, Ana Sofia, Ryngaert, Cedric and Wouters, Jan, International Organizations and Member State Responsibility: Critical Perspectives (Leiden, Boston: Brill Nijhoff Publishers, 2015).Google Scholar

Benvenisti, Eyal, The Law of Global Governance (The Hague: The Hague Academy of International Law, 2014).Google Scholar

Bernhardt, Rudolf, ‘International Organisations, Internal Law and Rules’, in Bernhardt, Rudolf (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. II (Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company, 1995), 1314–18.Google Scholar

Bertrand, Christine, ‘La nature juridique de l’Organisation pour la Sécurité et la Coopération en Europe (OSCE)’, Revue Générale de Droit International Public 98 (1998), 365–406.Google Scholar

Blokker, Niels, ‘Constituent Instruments’, in Klabbers, Jan and Wallendahl, Asa (eds.), Research Handbook on the Law of International Organizations (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011), 943–61.Google Scholar

Bogdandy, Armin von, Dann, Philipp and Goldmann, Matthias, ‘Developing the Publicness of Public International Law: Towards a Legal Framework for Global Governance Activities’, German Law Journal 9 (2008), 1376–1400.Google Scholar

Boutin, Bérénice, ‘Netherlands (Ministry of Defence and Ministry of Foreign Affairs) v Nuhanović, Final appeal judgment, ECLI/NL/HR/2013/BZ9225, ILDC 2061 (NL 2013), 12/03324, 6th September 2013, Netherlands; Supreme Court [HR]’, Oxford Reports on International Law in Domestic Courts (2013).Google Scholar

Braun, Dietmar, ‘Dezentraler und unitarischer Föderalismus. Die Schweiz und Deutschland im Vergleich’, Swiss Political Science Review 9 (2003), 57–89.Google Scholar

Brölmann, Catherine, The Institutional Veil in Public International Law: International Organisations and the Law of Treaties (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007).Google Scholar

Burri, Thomas, ‘Secession in the CIS: Causes, Consequences and Emerging Principles’, in Walter, Christian, von Ungern-Sternberg, Antje and Abushov, Kavus (eds.), Self-determination and Secession in International Law, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 138–56.Google Scholar

Cappelletti, Mauro, The Judicial Process in Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Clinton, Robert N., ‘Isolated in Their Own Country: A Defence of Federal Protection of Indian Autonomy and Self-Government’, Stanford Law Review 33 (6) (1981), 979–1068.Google Scholar

Cogen, Marc, An Introduction to European Intergovernmental Organisations (London, New York: Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar

Cooper, Scott, Hawkins, Darren, Jacoby, Wade and Nielson, Daniel, ‘Yielding Sovereignty to International Institutions: Bringing System Structure Back In’, International Studies Review 10 (2008), 501–24.Google Scholar

Crawford, James, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law 8th edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Crawford, James, State Responsibility: The General Part (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

D’Aspremont, Jean, ‘Abuse of the Legal Personality of International Organisations and the Responsibility of Member States’, International Organizations Law Review 4 (2007), 91–119.Google Scholar

Daugirdas, Kristina, ‘How and Why International Law Binds International Organizations’, Harvard International Law Journal 57 (2016), 325–81.Google Scholar

de Búrca, Gráinne, ‘The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order after Kadi’, Harvard International Law Journal 51 (2010), 1–49.Google Scholar

de Wet, Erika, ‘From Kadi to Nada: Judicial Techniques Favouring Human Rights over United Nations Security Council Sanctions’, Chinese Journal of International Law 12 (2013), 787–807.Google Scholar

Fassbender, Bardo, ‘Triepel in Luxemburg. Die dualistische Sicht des Verhältnisses zwischen Europa- und Völkerrecht in der “Kadi-Rechtsprechung” des EuGH als Problem des Selbstverständnisses der Europäischen Union’, Die öffentliche Verwaltung 63 (2010), 333–41.Google Scholar

Foldvary, Fred E., ‘Political Autonomy’, in Chatterjee, Deen K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Global Justice (Berlin: Springer, 2011), 853–4.Google Scholar

Gazzini, Tarcisio, ‘Legal Personality of International Organizations’, in Klabbers, Jan (ed.), Research Handbook on the Law of International Organizations (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011), 33–55.Google Scholar

Gazzini, Tarcisio, ‘The Relationship Between International Legal Personality and the Autonomy of International Organisations’, in White, Nigel D. and Collins, Richard (eds.), International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy, Institutional Independence in the International Legal Order (Routledge, 2011), 196–212.Google Scholar

Genser, Jared and Kate, Barth, ‘Targeted Sanctions and Due Process of Law’, in Genser, Jared and Ugarte, Bruno Stagno (eds.), The United Nations Security Council in the Age of Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 195–246.Google Scholar

Giegerich, Thomas, ‘Verantwortlichkeit und Haftung für Akte internationaler und supranationaler Organisationen’, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtwissenschaft 104 (2005), 163–91.Google Scholar

Grote, Jürgen R. and Gbikpi, Bernard (eds.), Participatory Governance: Political and Societal Implications (Berlin: Springer, 2002).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Polity Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Halberstam, Daniel, ‘It’s the Autonomy, Stupid! A Modest Defence of Opinion 2/13 on EU Accession to the ECHR, and the Way Forward’, German Law Journal 16 (2015), 105–46.Google Scholar

Hannum, Hurst and Lillich, Richard B., ‘The Concept of Autonomy in International Law’, The American Journal of International Law 74 (1980), 858–89.Google Scholar

Hawkins, Darren G., Lake, David A., Nielson, Daniel and Tierney, Michael J., ‘Delegation Under Anarchy: States, International Organizations and Principal Agent Theory’, in Hawkins, Darren G., Lake, David A., Nielson, Daniel and Tierney, Michael J. (eds.), Delegation and Agency in International Organizations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 3–38.Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn, ‘The Legal Consequences for Member States of the Non-fulfilment by International Organisations of their Obligations toward Third Parties’, Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international 66-I (1995), 375–420.Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn, Problems & Processes: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Huber, John D. and Shipan, Charles R., Deliberate Discretion? The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Jensen, Laura S., ‘Federal Authority vs. State Autonomy: The Supreme Court’s Role Revisited’, Public Administration Review 59-II (1999), 97–9.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico and Steward, Richard B., ‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law’, Law and Contemporary Problems 68 (2005), 15–61.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, ‘Institutional Ambivalence by Design: Soft Organizations in International Law’, Nordic Journal of International Law 70 (2001), 403–21.Google Scholar

Klein, Pierre, ‘International Organizations or Institutions, Decision-Making Process’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. V (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 403–21.Google Scholar

Kokott, Juliane and Sobotta, Christoph, ‘The Kadi Case – Constitutional Core Values and International Law – Finding the Balance?’, The European Journal of International Law 23 (2012), 1015–24.Google Scholar

Lagrange, Evelyne, La représentation institutionnelle dans l’ordre international: Une contribution à la théorie de la personnalité morale des organisations internationales (The Hague: Kluwer, 2002).Google Scholar

Hartwig, Matthias, Die Haftung der Mitgliedstaaten für internationale Organisationen (Berlin, New York, London: Springer, 1993).Google Scholar

Nedeski, Nataša and Nollkaemper, André, ‘Responsibility of International Organizations in Connection with Acts of States’, International Organizations Law Review 9 (2012), 33–52.Google Scholar

Niedobitek, Matthias, ‘OSCE and Kosovo’, in Hilpold, Peter (ed.), Kosovo and International Law: The ICJ Advisory Opinion of 22 July 2010 (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012), 139–56.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, Ramses, Wessel A. and Jan, Wouters, ‘When Structures Become Shackles: Stagnation and Dynamics in International Lawmaking’, European Journal of International Law 25 (2014), 733–63.Google Scholar

Pellet, Allain, ‘L’imputabilité d’éventuels actes illicites: Responsabilité de l’OTAN ou des Etats membres’, in Tomuschat, Christian (ed.), Kosovo and the International Community: A Legal Assessment (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002), 193–202.Google Scholar

Peters, Anne, ‘Membership in the Global Constitutional Community’, in Klabbers, Jan, Peters, Anne and Ulfstein, Geir, The Constitutionalization of International Law 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 153–262.Google Scholar

Phan, Hao Duy, ‘The Association of Southeast Asian Nations: International Legal Personality and its Treaty-Making Power’, International Organizations Law Review 13 (2016), 273–307.Google Scholar

Reinalda, Bob and Verbeek, Bertjan (eds.), Autonomous Policy-Making by International Organisations (London; New York: Routledge, 1998).Google Scholar

August, Reinisch (ed.), International Organisations before National Courts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

August, Reinisch (ed.), The Privileges and Immunities of International Organisations in Domestic Courts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

August, Reinisch, ‘Privileges and Immunities’, in Katz Cogan, Jacob, Hurd, Ian and Johnstone, Ian (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Organizations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 1048–68.Google Scholar

Rittberger, Volker, Zangl, Bernhard and Staisch, Matthias, International Organization Polity, Politics and Policies (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).Google Scholar

Sarooshi, Dan, International Organizations and Their Exercise of Sovereign Powers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Schermers, Henry G. and Blokker, Niels M., International Institutional Law: Unity within Diversity 5th edn (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011).Google Scholar

Schmalenbach, Kirsten, ‘International Organizations or Institutions: General Aspects’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 1126–53.Google Scholar

Seidl-Hohenveldern, Ignaz, ‘Liability of Member States for Acts or Omissions of an International Organization’, in Schlemmer-Schulte, Sabine and Tung, Ko-Yung (eds.), Liber Amicorum Ibrahim F. I. Shihata: International Finance & Development Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2001), 727–39.Google Scholar

Simma, Bruno and Pulkowski, Dirk, ‘Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimes in International Law’, The European Journal of International Law 17 (2006), 483–529.Google Scholar

Steinbrück Platise, Mateja, ‘The Development of the Immunities of International Organizations in Response to Domestic Contestations’, in Kanetake, Machiko and Nollkaemper, André (eds.), The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels: Contestations and Deference, Studies in International Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2016), 67–97.Google Scholar

Stumer, Andrew, ‘Liability of Member States for Acts of International Organizations: Reconsidering the Policy Objections’, Harvard International Law Journal 48 (2007), 553–80.Google Scholar

Suksi, Markku, ‘Autonomy’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. I (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 754–68.Google Scholar

Summers, James, ‘Kosovo’, in Christian, Walter, Antje, von Ungern-Sternberg and Kavus, Abushov (eds.), Self-Determination and Secession in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 235–54.Google Scholar

Venzke, Ingo, ‘International Bureaucracies from a Political Science Perspective – Agency, Authority and International Institutional Law’, German Law Journal 9 (2008), 1401–28.Google Scholar

Vidal, Maarten, ‘Siedler v. Western European Union, Appeal Judgment, JT 2004, 617, ILDC 53 (BE 2003), 17th September 2003, Belgium; Brussels; Labour Court of Appeal; 4th Chamber’, Oxford Reports on International Law in Domestic Courts (2006).Google Scholar

Walter, Christian, ‘Subjects of International Law’, in Rüdiger, Wolfrum (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. IX (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 634–43.Google Scholar

Weiler, Joseph H. H. and Haltern, Ulrich ‘The Autonomy of the Community Legal Order - Through the Looking Glass’, Harvard International Law Journal 37 (1996), 411–48.Google Scholar

Wellens, Karel, Remedies against International Organisations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Wenig, Marcus, ‘Der völkerrechtliche Status der OSZE – Gegenwärtiger Stand und Perspektiven’, OSZE-Jahrbuch 3 (1997), 393–411.Google Scholar

Wessel, Ramses A. and Blockmans, Steven, ‘Between Autonomy and Dependence: The EU Legal Order Under the Influence of International Organisations – An Introduction’, in Wessel, Ramses A. and Blockmans, Steven (eds.), Between Autonomy and Dependence: The EU Legal Order Under the Influence of International Organisations (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press; Springer, 2013), 1–9.Google Scholar

Wessel, Ramses A., ‘Revisiting the International Legal Status of the EU’, European Foreign Affairs Review 5 (2000), 507–37.Google Scholar

White, Nigel, The Law of International Organisations (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Wouters, Jan, Brems, Eva, Smis, Stefaan and Schmitt, Pierre (eds.), Accountability for Human Rights Violations by International Organisations (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2010).Google Scholar

Young, Ernest A., ‘Protecting Member State Autonomy in the European Union: Some Cautionary Tales from American Federalism’, New York University Law Review 77 (2002), 1612–737.Google Scholar

Zürn, Michael, Nollkaemper, André and Peerenboom, Randy, Rule of Law Dynamics: In an Era of International and Transnational Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar