Part I
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 June 2019
Edited by
Summary
The debate about legal transplants is very well knownUnfortunately that debate, while familiar, or at least familiarly confusing to many, has become trapped in a number of rather fixed binaries. It appears to have failed to achieve either resolution or forward movement. And this is in spite of a number of laudable attempts to untie the knot.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Legal Transplants in East Asia and Oceania , pp. 11 - 108Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
VII Bibliography
Cotterrell, R., ’Why Must Legal Ideas Be Interpreted Sociologically?’, Journal of Law and Society 25, no. 2 (1998), 171–92.Google Scholar
Crouch, M. and Lindsey, T. (eds.), ‘Law and Development in Its Burmese Moment: Legal Reform in an Emerging Democracy’ in Law, Society and Transition in Myanmar (2014), 280–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474201650.Google Scholar
Crouch, M. and Lindsey, T.(eds.), Law, Society and Transition in Myanmar (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474201650.Google Scholar
du Plessis, P. J., Ando, C., and Tuori, K. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society Oxford Handbooks (Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Ewald, W., ’Comparative Jurisprudence (II): The Logic of Legal Transplants’, American Journal of Comparative Law 43, no. 4 (1995), 489–510.Google Scholar
Foster, N., ‘Transmigration and Transferability of Commercial Law in a Globalized World’ in Comparative Law in the 21st Century, Harding, A. and Örücü, E. (eds.), (Kluwer Law International, 2002).Google Scholar
Harding, A., ‘Global Doctrine and Local Knowledge: Law in South East Asia’, International & Comparative Law Quarterly 51, no. 1 (January 2002), 35–53.Google Scholar
Harding, A.,, and Nicholson, P.,and Örücü, E. (eds.) Comparative Law in the 21st Century (Kluwer Law International, 2002).Google Scholar
Hoang, T. L., Vice-Minister for Justice, Vietnam, ‘Reforming the Law-Making Process’, Vietnam Law Magazine, 22 June 2007, http://vietnamlawmagazine.vn/reforming-the-lawmaking-process-3279.html accessed 25 May 2017.Google Scholar
Otto, J. M., van Rooij, B., and Arnscheidt, J., Lawmaking for Development: Explorations into the Theory and Practice of International Legislative Projects (Leiden University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Jauhari, I., ‘The Role of Government in Regulating Marriage Administration System in Indonesia’ International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 5, no. 1 (2015), 11.Google Scholar
Kahn‐Freund, O., ’On Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law’, Modern Law Review 37, no. 1 (1 January, 1974), 1–27.Google Scholar
Kenyon, A., Marjoribanks, T., and Whiting, A. (eds.), 1st edn, Democracy, Media and Law in Malaysia and Singapore: A Space for Speech (Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar
Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Protection of the Rights and Interests of Elderly People, 2013, available at: www.china.org.cn/english/government/207404.htm accessed 24 May 2017.Google Scholar
Lee, H. P., ‘Malaysian Royalty and the Special Court’ in New Courts in Asia, Harding, A. and Nicholson, P. (eds.) (Routledge, 2010) 240–56.Google Scholar
Legrand, P., ‘Legal Transplants and European Private Law’, vol. 4.4, Electronic Journal of Comparative Law 4, no. 4 .Google Scholar
Legrand, P.,’The Impossibility of ‘Legal Transplants’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 4, no. 2 (1 June, 1997), 111–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattei, U., ‘Three Patterns of Law: Taxonomy and Change in the World’s Legal Systems’, The American Journal of Comparative Law 45, no. 1 (1997), 5–44.Google Scholar
Nicholson, P., Borrowing Court Systems: The Experience of Socialist Vietnam (Brill Nijhoff, 2007).Google Scholar
Nicholson, P.,and Biddulph, S. (eds.), Examining Practice, Interrogating Theory: Comparative Legal Studies in Asia (Martinus Nijhoff, 2008).Google Scholar
Nicholson, P.,Biddulph, S. and Harding, A. (eds.), ‘The Eclipse of the Astrologers: King Mongkut, His Successors, and the Reformation of Law in Thailand’ in Examining Practice, Interrogating Theory: Comparative Legal Studies in Asia (Martinus Nijhoff, 2008).Google Scholar
Phang Boon Leong, A., ‘Reception of English Law in Singapore: Problems and Proposed Solutions’, Singapore Academy of Law Journal no. 1 (1990), 20.Google Scholar
Renshaw, C. ‘Human Rights under the New Regime’ in Constitutionalism and Legal Change in Myanmar, Harding, A. and Oo, K. K. (eds.) (Hart Publishing, 2017) 146–62.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A., ‘Constitutional Courts’ in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, Rosenfeld, M. and Sajó, A. (eds.) (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Tamanaha, B., ‘Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global’ Sydney Law Review 30 (2007),375.Google Scholar
Tan, C., ’We Are Registered’: Actual Processes and the Law of Marriage in Singapore’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 13, no. 1 (April 1, 1999), 1–32.Google Scholar
Tan, K. ’Defaming Politicians, Scandalising the Courts: A Look at Recent Developments in Singapore’ in Democracy, Media and Law in Malaysia and Singapore: A Space for Speech, Kenyon, A. T., Marjoribanks, T., and Whiting, A. (eds.) 1st edn (Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar
Tensmeyer, S., ‘Modernizing Chinese Trust Law’, New York University Law Review 90 (2015), 710.Google Scholar
Teubner, G., ’Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends up in New Divergences’, Modern Law Review 61, no. 1 (1998), 11–32.Google Scholar
Trzcinski, L. M. and Upham, F. K., ’Creating Law from the Ground Up: Land Law in Post-Conflict Cambodia’ Asian Journal of Law and Society 1, no. 1 (May 2014), 55–77.Google Scholar
Twining, W., General Jurisprudence Understanding Law from a Global Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Watson, A., Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law (University of Georgia Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Wright, J. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences 2nd edn (Elsevier, 2015).Google Scholar
IX Bibliography
‘Tonga Laws Are There to Protect the People Who Have No Power’, Matangi Tonga, 2004 www.matangitonga.to/home/ward/htm accessed 21 July 2004.Google Scholar
Notes on Evidence (Amendment) Bill 2016 (Tonga).Google Scholar
Angelo, T. and Wright, F., ‘Pitcairn: Sunset on the Empire?’, New Zealand Law Journal (2004), 431.Google Scholar
Australian Law Reform Commission, ‘Recognition of Aboriginal Customary Laws’ (Report 31, 1986).Google Scholar
Corrin, J. and Foote, E., ‘Failing to adopt a new approach: the law of adoption in Solomon Islands’ in Atkin, B. (ed.), The International Survey of Family Law (Jordan Publishing, 2014).Google Scholar
Farran, Sue, ‘The “Re-Colonising” of Pitcairn’, Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 38 (3) (2007), 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn-Freund, O., ‘Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law’, Modern Law Review 37 (1974), 1.Google Scholar
Twining, W., ‘Diffusion of Law: A Global Perspective’, Journal of Legal Pluralism 49 (2004), 1.Google Scholar
Twining, W., ‘Normative and Legal Pluralism: A Global Perspective’, Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 20 (2010), 473.Google Scholar
Watson, A., Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law 2nd edn (University of Georgia Press, 1993).Google Scholar
VII Bibliography
Bentham, J., ‘A General View of a Complete Code of Laws’, in Bowring, J.(ed.), The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 3 (Russell and Russell, 1962).Google Scholar
Bentham, J.An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, ed. Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A. (The Athlone Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Bentham, J.A Comment on the Commentaries and a Fragment on Government, ed. Burns, J. H.and Hart, H. L. A. (The Athlone Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Bentham, J.Constitutional Code, ed. Rosen, F. and Burns, J. H. (Oxford University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Bentham, J.Securities against Misrule and Other Constitutional Writings for Tripoli and Greece, ed. Schofield, P. (Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Bentham, J.Legislator of the World: Writings on Codification, Law and Education, ed. Schofield, P. and Harris, J. (Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Bentham, J.ed. Schofield, P. and Engelmann, S. ‘Place and Time’ in Engelmann, S. (ed.), Selected Writings: Jeremy Bentham (Yale University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Bentham, J.‘On the Liberty of Press, and Public Discussion’, in Pease-Watkin, C. and Schofield, P. (eds.), On the Liberty of Press, and Public Discussion and Other Legal and Political Writings for Spain and Portugal (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Burns, J. H., ‘Utilitarianism and Reform: Social Theory and Social Change, 1750–1800’, Utilitas 1 (2) (1989), 211.Google Scholar
Fukagai, Y. and Kaino, M. (eds.), The Challenges of Jeremy Bentham (Nakanishiya Publishing, 2015).Google Scholar
Mill, J. S., ‘Utilitarianism’, in Williams, G. (ed.), Utilitarianism, On Liberty, Considerations on Representative Government (Everyman’s Library, 1993).Google Scholar
Nagai, Y., Jeremy Bentham: Critical Biography of British Intellectuals (Kenkyusha, 2013).Google Scholar
Postema, G., ‘Interests, Universal and Particular: Bentham’s Utilitarian Theory of Value’, Utilitas 18 (2) (2006), 109.Google Scholar
Postema, G.‘The Soul of Justice: Bentham on Publicity, Law, and the Rule of Law’ in Zhai, X. and Quinn, M. (eds.), Bentham’s Theory of Law and Public Opinion (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Quinn, M., ‘Popular Prejudices, Real Pains: What Is the Legislator to Do When the People Err in Assigning Mischief’ in Zhai, X. and Quinn, M. (eds.), Bentham’s Theory of Law and Public Opinion (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Rosen, F., Jeremy Bentham and the Representative Democracy (Oxford University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Schofield, P. and Bentham, J. ‘The Principle of Utility, and Legal Positivism’, Current Legal Problems 56 (1) (2003), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchida, T., The Birth of Legal Study: What Was ‘Law’ for Modern Japan (Chikuma Shobo, 2018).Google Scholar
Warke, T., ‘Classical Utilitarianism and the Methodology of Determinate Choice in Economics and in Ethics’, Journal of Economic Methodology 7 (3) (2000), 373.Google Scholar
VI Bibliography
Adams, M. and Heirbaut, D. (eds.), The Method and Culture of Comparative Law: Essays in Honour of Mark Van Hoecke (Hart Publishing, 2014).Google Scholar
Atkinson, G. and Paschall, S. P., Law and Economics from an Evolutionary Perspective (Edward Elgar, 2016).Google Scholar
Brennan, P. M., ‘Subsidiarity in the Tradition of Catholic Social Doctrine’ in Evans, M. and Zimmermann, A. (eds.), Global Perspectives on Subsidiarity (Springer, 2014) 29.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. and Tullock, G., The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy (University of Michigan Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Burkhardt, R., The Spirit of System: Lamarck and Evolutionary Biology (Harvard University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Church, C., and Dardanelli, P., ‘The Dynamics of Confederalism and Federalism: Comparing Swizerland and the EU’, Regional & Federal Studies 15 (2) (2005), 163.Google Scholar
Cox, G. W., The Efficient Secret: The Cabinet and the Development of Political Parties in Victorian England (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (Liberty Classics, 1982).Google Scholar
Gussen, B. F., ‘On the Problem of Scale: A General Theory of Morphogenesis and Normative Policy Signals for Economic Evolution’, Evolutionary and Institutional Economic Review 12 (2015), 81.Google Scholar
Gussen, B. F.‘Australian Constitutionalism between Subsidiarity and Federalism’, Monash University Law Review 42 (2) (2016), 383.Google Scholar
Gussen, B. F.‘Reflections on La Fata Morgana: Watsonian “prestige” and Bagehotian “efficiency”’, The Journal of Comparative Law 12 (1) (2017), 80 (ISSN 1477–0814).Google Scholar
Htay, S. N. N. and Salman, S. A., ‘Transaction Cost Theory, Political Theory and Resource Dependency Theory in Light of Unconventional Aspect’, IOSP Journal of Humanities and Social Science 12 (5) (2013), 89.Google Scholar
Hueglin, T. O., Comparative Federalism : A Ssystematic Inquiry (University of Toronto Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. P. M., ‘The Judicial Process and Canadian Legislative Powers’, Washington University Law Review 25 (2) (1940), 215.Google Scholar
Klaes, M., ‘Historical Economics and Evolutionary Economic Policy: Coasean Perspectives’ in Dopfer, K. (ed.), Economics, Evolution and the State: The Governance of Complexity (Edward Elgar, 2005), 78.Google Scholar
Kurland, P. B. and Lerner, R., The Founders Constitution, vol. 5 (Liberty Fund, 2001), 20.Google Scholar
Leyland, P., The Constitution of the United Kingdom: A Contextual Analysis (Bloomsbury, 2016).Google Scholar
Madison, J., ‘The Federalist No. 45: “The Alleged Danger from the Powers of the Union to the State Governments Considered”’ in Hamilton, A., Madison, J. and Jay, J. (eds.), The Federalist (Barnes & Noble Classics, 2006).Google Scholar
Mattei, U., ‘Efficiency in Legal Transplants: an Essay in Comparative Law and Economics’, International Review of Law and Economics 14 (1994), 3.Google Scholar
Ola, O., ‘Confederal Systems: A Comparative Analysis’, Civilisations 18 (2) (1968), 270.Google Scholar
Posner, R., Law and Literature: A Misunderstood Relation (Harvard University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Quick, J. and Garran, R. R., The Annotated Constitution of the Australian Commonwealth (LexisNexis Butterworths, 2015).Google Scholar
Roe, M. J., ‘Chaos and Evolution in Law and Economics’, Harvard Law Review 109 (3) (1996), 641.Google Scholar
Ruzzenenti, F. and Basosi, R., ‘On the Relationship between Energy Efficiency and Complexity: Insights on the Causality Chain’, International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics 3 (2) (2008), 95.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M., The Constitution of the United States of America: A Contextual Analysis 2nd edn (Hart, 2015).Google Scholar
Veblen, T., The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions (Penguin, 1994).Google Scholar
von Wangenheim, G., ‘Evolutionary Theories in Law and Economics and Their Use for Comparative Legal Theory’, Review of Law & Economics 7 (3) (2011), 737.Google Scholar
Watson, A., Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law (University of Georgia Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Weber, M., The Methodology of the Social Sciences, eds. and trans. Shils, E. and Finch, H. (Free Press, 1949).Google Scholar
Zumbansen, P. and Calliess, G.-P. (eds.), Law, Economics and Evolutionary Theory (Edward Elgar, 2011).Google Scholar