Part III
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 June 2019
Edited by
Summary
Environmental law is of relatively recent origin having emerged as a genuine sub-field of law in the 1970s. Its evolution is top down, bottom up and transnational International environmental law developed rapidly in the wake of the 1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, leading to a proliferation of treaties that set standards and new frameworks for environmental legal protection and biodiversity conservation. There is little doubt that this international environmental law has played a significant role in addressing global environmental problems by setting standards, assisting with capacity building, and providing a forum for discussion and sharing of ideas. Nevertheless, national and sub-national legal responses to local environmental impacts and problems pre-existed international environmental law, but the environmental movement and public demand for action fuelled their expansion. Transboundary environmental concerns have also led governments to adopt regional and transnational environmental law to achieve common goals.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Legal Transplants in East Asia and Oceania , pp. 231 - 324Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
VII Bibliography
Affolder, N., ‘Looking for Law in Unusual Places: Cross-Border Diffusion of Environmental Norms’ Transnational Environmental Law (2018) https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102518000080, 1–25.Google Scholar
Atlas of Marine Protection, Global Marine Protection Agreements www.mpatlas.org/progress/targets/ accessed 11 September 2018.Google Scholar
Atlas of Marine Protection, Shark Sanctuary, www.mpatlas.org/category/shark-sanctuary/ accessed 16 May 2018.Google Scholar
Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer, opened for signature 22 March 1985, 26 ILM 1529 (entered into force 22 September 1988).Google Scholar
Convention for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (Paris), opened for signature 16 November 1972, 1037 UNTS 151 (entered into force 17 December 1975).Google Scholar
Convention on Biological Diversity, opened for signature 5 June 1992, 1760 UNTS 79 (entered into force 29 December 1993).Google Scholar
Convention on Biological Diversity, COP 7 Decision VII/28, Seventh Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.Google Scholar
Convention on Biological Diversity, Aichi Biodiversity Targets, www.cbd.int/sp/targets/ accessed 11 September 2018.Google Scholar
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, opened for signature 3 March 1973, 993 UNTS 243 (entered into force 1 July 1975).Google Scholar
Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals opened for signature 23 June 1979 19 ILM 15 (entered into force 1 November 1983).Google Scholar
Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat opened for signature 2 February 1971 996 UNTS 245 (entered into force 21 December 1975).Google Scholar
Davidson, L. N. K., ‘Shark Sanctuaries: Substance or Spin?’, Science 338 (6114) (2012), 1538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dell’Apa, A., Chad Smith, M., and Kaneshiro-Pineiro, M. Y., ‘The Influence of Culture on the International Management of Shark Finning’, Environmental Management 54 (2014), 151.Google Scholar
Dudley, N. (ed.), Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories (IUCN, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO, ‘International Plan of Action for Conservation and Management of Sharks: Regional Shark Measures’ www.fao.org/ipoa-sharks/regional-sharks-measures/en/ accessed 11 September 2018.Google Scholar
Ferreira de Souza Dias, B., and Garforth, K., ‘Historical perspectives on the challenge of biodiversity conservation’ in Morgera, E. and Razzaque, J. Biodiversity and Nature Protection Law (Edward Elgar, 2017).Google Scholar
Forsyth, A., The ‘Transplantability’ debate in comparative law and comparative labour law: Implications for Australian borrowing from European Labour Law (Working Paper No. 38, Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law, The University of Melbourne 2006).Google Scholar
Johannes, R. E., ‘Traditional Marine Conservation Methods in Oceania and Their Demise’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 9 (1978), 349–64.Google Scholar
Kahn-Freund, O., ‘The uses and misuses of comparative law’, Modern Law Review 37 (1) (1974), 1.Google Scholar
Kern, K., Jörgens, H., and Jänicke, M., The diffusion of environmental policy innovations: A contribution to the globalisation of environmental policy (Discussion Papers, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, Forschungsschwerpunkt Technik – Arbeit – Umwelt, Abteilung Normbildung und Umwelt, 2001) http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-114964 accessed 13 September 2018.Google Scholar
Legrand, P., ‘The Impossibility of ‘Legal Transplants’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 4 (1997), 111.Google Scholar
Marinesque, S., Kaplan, D. M. and Rodwell, L. D., ‘Global implementation of marine protected areas: Is the developing world being left behind?’, Marine Policy 36 (3) (2012), 727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, R. A. and Worm, B., ‘Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities’, Nature 423 (2003), 280.Google Scholar
Myers, R. A., Baum, J. K., Shepherd, T. D., Powers, S. P. and Peterson, C. H., ‘Cascading effects of the loss of apex predatory sharks from a coastal ocean’, Science 315 (2007), 1846.Google Scholar
Niue Treaty on Cooperation in Fisheries Surveillance and Law Enforcement in the South Pacific Region opened for signature, 9 July 1992, 32 ILM 136 (entered into force 20 May 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Protected Planet, Marine Protected Areas www.protectedplanet.net/marine accessed 11 September 2018.Google Scholar
Protected Planet, Protected areas coverage in 2018 www.protectedplanet.net/marine accessed 11 September 2018.Google Scholar
Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, opened for signature 16 September 1987, 26 ILM 154 (entered into force 1 January 1989).Google Scholar
Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (1992) UN Doc A/CONF.151/26 (14 June 1992).Google Scholar
Sand, P. H., Transnational Environmental Law: Lessons in Global Change (Kluwer Law International, 1999).Google Scholar
Secretariat of the Pacific Community (2006) Guidelines for developing national legislation for the protection of traditional knowledge and expressions of culture based on the Pacific Model Law 2002 www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/spc/spc001en.pdf accessed 7 September 2018.Google Scholar
Shark Research Institute, Global Shark Attack File www.sharkattackfile.net/incidentlog.htm accessed 11 September 2018.Google Scholar
Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform, Sustainable Development Goal 14 https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg14 accessed 11 September 2018.Google Scholar
Techera, E. J., ‘A review of Marine Protected Area legislation in Australia’ in Fitzsimons, J. and Wescott, G. (eds.), Big, Bold and Blue: Lessons from Australia’s Marine Protected Areas (CSIRO Publishing, 2016).Google Scholar
Techera, E., ‘Marine Protected Areas: contemporary challenges and developments’ in Hussain, D. and Karim, M. S. (eds.), International Marine Environmental Law and Policy (Routledge, 2018).Google Scholar
Techera, E. J., ‘Protected Area Management in Vanuatu’, Macquarie Journal of International and Comparative Environmental Law 2 (2) (2005), 107.Google Scholar
Techera, E., ‘Safeguarding Indigenous Bio-Cultural Heritage in the South Pacific Small Island States’, Policy Matters 17 (2010), 29.Google Scholar
The Pew Charitable Trust, Pacific Islands Collaborate to Enforce World’s First Regional Shark Sanctuary www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2016/04/21/pacific-islands-collaborate-to-enforce-worlds-first-regional-shark-sanctuary accessed 11 September 2018.Google Scholar
The Pew Charitable Trusts, Shark sanctuaries around the world www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/fact-sheets/2016/03/shark-sanctuaries-around-the-world accessed 11 September 2018.Google Scholar
UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, opened for signature 10 December 1982, 1833 UNTS 3 (entered into force 16 November 1994).Google Scholar
UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, opened for signature 9 May 1992, 1771 UNTS 107, art. 3 (1) (entered into force 24 March 1994)Google Scholar
Ward-Paige, C. and Worm, B., ‘Global evaluation of shark sanctuaries’, Global Environmental Change 47 (2017), 174.Google Scholar
Warner, R. and Marsden, S., Transboundary Environmental Governance: Inland, Coastal and Marine Perspectives (Ashgate Publishing, 2013).Google Scholar
Wiener, J. B., ‘Something Borrowed for Something Blue: Legal Transplants and the Evolution of Global Environmental Law’, Ecology Law Quarterly 27 (2001), 1295.Google Scholar
Yang, T. and Percival, R. V., ‘The Emergence of Global Environmental Law’, Ecology Law Quarterly 36 (3) (2009), 615.Google Scholar
IX Bibliography
Akhavan, P., ‘Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities?’, American Journal of International Law 95 (2001), 7.Google Scholar
Alston, P., ‘Transplanting Foreign Norms: Human Rights and Other International Legal Norms in Japan’, European Journal of International Law 10 (1999), 627.Google Scholar
Arthur, P., ‘How Transitions Reshaped Human Rights: A Conceptual History of Transitional Justice’, Human Rights Quarterly 31 (2009), 321.Google Scholar
Ba, A., Kuik, C. C. and Sueo, S., Institutionalizing East Asia: Mapping and Reconfiguring Regional Cooperation (Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar
Bagas, J., ‘Duterte and Donor Withdrawal’, Sur – International Journal on Human Rights 26 (2017), 37.Google Scholar
Baird, N., ‘The Role of International Non-Governmental Organisations in the Universal Periodic Review of Pacific Island States: Can Doing Good Be Done Better’, Melbourne Journal of International Law 16 (2015), 550.Google Scholar
Banks, C. and Baker, J. Comparative, International, and Global Justice: Perspectives from Criminology and Criminal Justice (SAGE, 2015).Google Scholar
Boehringer, G., ‘Duterte’s Drug War: Violating Rights for a Quick Fix’, Alternative Law Journal 42 (2017), 233.Google Scholar
Chan, J., Gender and Human Rights Politics in Japan: Global Norms and Domestic Networks (Stanford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Cheah, W., ‘Walking the Long Road in Solidarity and Hope’, Harvard Human Rights Journal 22 (2009), 99.Google Scholar
Cheesman, N., D’Costa, B. and Haberkon, T. ‘Anticipating the Struggle against Everyday Impunity in Myanmar through Accounts from Bangladesh and Thailand’, Asia and The Pacific Policy Studies 3 (2016), 48.Google Scholar
Chesterman, S., ‘International Criminal Law with Asian Characteristics?’, Columbia Journal of Asian Law 27 (2013), 142.Google Scholar
Chesterman, S.‘Asia’s Ambivalence about International Law and Institutions: Past, Present and Futures’, European Journal of International Law 27 (2016), 950.Google Scholar
Deutrom, Rhian, ‘Japanese ‘Comfort Women’s’ Memorial In 18 C Complaint’, The Australian, 15 December 2016 www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/war-womens-memorial-in-18 c-complaint/news-story/f4a13f4a10fede4b1c19c96e403679aa accessed 14 September 2017.Google Scholar
Dicker, N., ‘Aiding Transitional Justice in Solomon Islands’, Buffalo Human Rights Law Review 21 (2015), 77.Google Scholar
Digital Museum: The Comfort Women Issue and the Asian Women’s Fund, ‘From a Memorandum sent by Tadaichi Kawahara, Adjutant in the Ministry of War, “Measures to Enforce Military Discipline from the Experiences in the China Incident’ www.awf.or.jp/e1/facts-02.html accessed 20 December 2017.Google Scholar
Digital Museum: The Comfort Women Issue and the Asian Women’s Fund‘Statement by Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi on the 60th Anniversary of the End of the War’ (Asian Women’s Fund, 2005) www.awf.or.jp/e6/statement-36.html accessed 12 September 2017.Google Scholar
Dolgopol, U.‘Crimes against the Comfort Women in the Tokyo Trial’ in Tanaka, Y., L. H. McCormack, T., Simpson, G., Beyond Victor’s Justice? The Tokyo War Crimes Trial Revisited (BRILL, 2011).Google Scholar
Dolgopol, U.and Paranjape S, ‘Comfort Women: An Unfinished Ordeal’ (Report, International Commission of Jurists, 1994) 197 http://icj.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/1994/01/Japan-comfort-women-fact-finding-report-1994-eng.pdf accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
Dolidze, A., ‘Bridging Comparative and International Law: Amicus Curiae Participation as a Vertical Legal Transplant’, European Journal of International Law 26 (2015), 851.Google Scholar
Donghua, H., ‘The Tokyo Trials and Japanese Revisionism: Political Maneuver or Criminal Justice’, China Legal Science Journal 3 (2015), 71.Google Scholar
du Plessis, M. and Ford, J. ‘Transitional Justice: A Future Truth Commission for Zimbabwe?’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 58 (2009), 87.Google Scholar
Dussich, J., Fujiwara, Y. and Sagisaka, A. ‘Decisions Not to Report Sexual Assault in Japan’, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 45 (2001), 35.Google Scholar
Engle, K., ‘A Genealogy of the Criminal Turn in Human Rights’ in Engle, K., Miller, Z. and Davis, D. M. (eds.), Anti-Impunity and the Human Rights Agenda (Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Freeland, S., ‘A Prosecution Too Far? Reflections on the Accountability of Heads of State under International Criminal Law’, Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 41 (2010), 179.Google Scholar
Futamura, M., War Crimes Tribunals and Transitional Justice: The Tokyo Trial and the Nuremberg Legacy (Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar
Galindo, G., ‘Legal Transplants between Time and Space’ in Duve, Thomas (ed.), Entanglements in Legal History: Conceptual Approaches (Max Planck, 2014).Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J. and Levinson, D., ‘Law for States: International Law, Constitutional Law, Public Law’, Harvard Law Review 122 (2009), 1.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, K., ‘The ‘History Problem’ in Sino-Japanese Relations: What’s the Problem?’ (E-International Relations, 31 October 2016) www.e-ir.info/2016/10/31/the-history-problem-in-sino-japanese-relations-whats-the-problem/ accessed 21 January 2018.Google Scholar
Haley, J., Authority without Power: Law and the Japanese Paradox (Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Harding, A., ‘Global Doctrine and Local Knowledge: Law in South East Asia’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 51 (2002),35.Google Scholar
Hata, I., ‘No Organised or Forced Recruitment: Misconceptions about Comfort Women and the Japanese Military’ (Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact, 2007) www.sdh-fact.com/category/comfort-women/ accessed 5 October 2017.Google Scholar
Hayashi, Y., ‘Implementation of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women in Japan’, Journal of East Asian and International Law 6 (2013), 341.Google Scholar
Hearman, V., ‘Between Citizenship and Human Rights: The Struggle for Justice after Indonesia’s 1965 Mass Violence’, Citizenship Studies 22 (2018), 175.Google Scholar
Hee-Seok Shin, E., ‘The “Comfort Women” Reparation Movement: Between Universal Women’s Human Right and Particular Anti-Colonial Nationalism’, Florida Journal of International Law 28 (2016), 87.Google Scholar
Hein, L., ‘Savage Irony: The Imaginative Power of the ‘Military Comfort Women’ in the 1990s’, Gender and History 11 (1999), 336.Google Scholar
Hein, P., ‘Unresolved Comfort Women Issue: How Pragmatism Precludes Reconciliation’, The Korean Journal of International Studies 14 (2016), 447.Google Scholar
Hessbruegge, J., ‘Justice Delayed, Not Denied: Statutory Limitations and Human Rights Crimes’, Georgetown Journal of International Law 43 (2012), 335.Google Scholar
Igarashi, M., ‘Post-War Compensation Cases, Japanese Courts and International Law’, Japanese Annual of International Law 45 (2000), 45.Google Scholar
International Center for Transitional Justice, ‘Briefing Paper: Transitional Justice in the United Nations Human Rights Council’ (International Center for Transitional Justice, 6 July 2011) www.ictj.org/publication/transitional-justice-united-nations-human-rights-council accessed 15 September 2017.Google Scholar
Iwanaga, K., ‘Women’s Political Representation in Japan’ in Iwanaga, K. (ed.), Women’s Political Participation and Representation in Asia: Obstacles and Challenges (NIAS Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Iwasawa, Y., ‘International Law in the Japanese Legal Order: Recent Developments’, American Society of International Law Proceedings 91 (1997), 302.Google Scholar
Jeffery, R. and Kim, H. (eds.), Transitional Justice in the Asia-Pacific (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Johnson, D., The Japanese Way of Justice: Prosecuting Crime in Japan (Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Kaur, J., ‘A Judicial Blackout: Judicial Impunity for Disappearances in Punjab, India’, Harvard Human Rights Journal 15 (2002), 269.Google Scholar
Kaur Sarkaria, M., ‘Lessons from Punjab’s Missing Girls: Toward a Global Feminist Perspective on Choice in Abortion [comments]’, California Law Review 97 (2009), 905.Google Scholar
Kim, H., ‘Missed Opportunities in the Judicialisation of International Criminal Law? Asian States in the Emergence and Spread of the Rome Statute System to Punish Atrocity Crimes’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 35 (2017), 246.Google Scholar
Kimura, M., Unfolding the ‘Comfort Women’ Debates: Modernity, Violence, Women’s Voices (Springer, 2016).Google Scholar
Kingston, J., ‘History Haunts Japan’s Prime Minister Abe’, Asia-Pacific Journal 13 (2015).Google Scholar
Knop, K. and Riles, A., ‘Space, Time, and Historical Injustice: A Feminist Conflict-of-Laws Approach to the Comfort Women Agreement’, Cornell Law Review 102 (2017), 853.Google Scholar
Lambourne, W., ‘Justice after Genocide: Impunity and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal 8 (2014), 29.Google Scholar
Landino, J., ‘Ianfu: No Comment Yet for Korean Comfort Women and the Impact of House Resolution 121’, Cardozo Journal of Law and Gender 15 (2009), 333.Google Scholar
Le Clercq Ortega, J. and Sánchez Lara, G. (eds.), Global Impunity Index (Fundación Universidad de las Américas Puebla, 2015).Google Scholar
Lee, S., ‘Comforting the Comfort Women: Who Can Make Japan Pay?’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of Economics and Law 24 (2003), 509.Google Scholar
Legrand, P., ‘The Impossibility of ‘Legal Transplants’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 4 (1997), 111.Google Scholar
Liddick, E. and Gagnon, J. ‘Striving for Peace and Reconciliation in Sri Lanka: A Creative Solution to Conflict’, War Crimes, Genocide and Crimes against Humanity 3 (2009), 39.Google Scholar
Lutz, E. and Sikkink, K. ‘The Justice Cascade: The Evolution and Impact of Foreign Human Rights Trials in Latin America’, Chicago Journal of International Law 2 (2001), 8.Google Scholar
Manirabona, A. and Wemmers, J.-A. ‘It Doesn’t Go Away with Time: Victims’ Need for Reparation Following Crimes against Humanity’ in Wemmers, J.-A. (ed.), Reparation for Victims of Crimes against Humanity: the Healing Role of Reparation (Routledge, 2014), 77.Google Scholar
McCargo, D., ‘Transitional Justice and Its Discontents’, Journal of Democracy 26 (2015), 5.Google Scholar
McCurry, J., ‘Former Sex Slaves Reject Japan and South Korea’s “Comfort Women” Accord’ The Guardian, 26 January 2016 www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/26/former-sex-slaves-reject-japan-south-koreas-comfort-women-accord accessed 14 September 2017.Google Scholar
McDougall, G., ‘Addressing State Responsibility for the Crime of Military Sexual Slavery during the Second World War: Further Attempts for Justice for the Comfort Women’, Korean Journal of International and Comparative Law 1 (2013), 137.Google Scholar
McGregor, K., ‘Exposing Impunity: Memory and Human Rights Activism in Indonesia and Argentina’, Journal of Genocide Research 19 (2017), 551.Google Scholar
Mera, K., Comfort Women not ‘Sex Slaves’: Rectifying the Myriad of Perspectives (Xlibris, 2015).Google Scholar
Merry, S., Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice (Chicago University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Merry, S.‘Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism’, American Anthropologist 108 (1) (2006), 44.Google Scholar
Merry, S. and Levitt, P. ‘Vernacularization on the Ground: Local Uses of Global Women’s Rights in Peru, China, India and the United States’, Global Networks 9 (2009), 441.Google Scholar
Morris, N., ‘Review: Yuki Tanaka – Japan’s Comfort Women: Sexual Slavery and Prostitution during World War II and the US Occupation’, Intersections: Gender, History and Culture in the Asian Context 9 (2003) http://intersections.anu.edu.au/issue9/morris_review.html accessed 21 January 2019.Google Scholar
Nelken, D., ‘Signaling Conformity: Changing Norms in Japan and China’, Michigan Journal of International Law 27 (2006), 933.Google Scholar
Odanaka, N., ‘From Responsibility to Compassion: Lessons from the Controversy over ‘Comfort Women in Japan’, Journal of Japanese Law 31 (2011), 49.Google Scholar
Onuma, Y., ‘Japanese War Guilt and Postwar Responsibilities of Japan’, Berkeley Journal of International Law 20 (2003), 600.Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, A., ‘Between Impunity and Accountability for Serious International Crimes: Legal and Policy Approaches’, Netherlands International Law Review 55 (2009), 217.Google Scholar
Orentlicher, D., “Settling Accounts’ Revisited: Reconciling Global Norms with Local Agency’, International Journal of Transitional Justice 1 (2007),19.Google Scholar
Örücü, E., ‘Law as Transposition’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 51 (2002), 205.Google Scholar
Ottley, B., ‘Legal Dissonance: The Interaction of Criminal Law and Customary Law in Papua New Guinea’, Asia Pacific Law Review 24 (2016), 83.Google Scholar
Park Hsu, Y., “Comfort Women’ From Korea: Japan’s World War II Sex Slaves and the Legitimacy of Their Claims for Reparations’, Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 2 (1993), 97.Google Scholar
Park Sonen, M., ‘Healing Multidimensional Wounds of Injustice: Intersectionality and the Korean “Comfort Women”’, Berkeley La Raza Law Journal 22 (2012), 269.Google Scholar
Peerenboom, R., ‘Assessing Human Rights in China: Why the Double Standard’, Cornell International Law Journal 38 (2005), 71.Google Scholar
Penrose, M., ‘Impunity- Inertia, Inaction, and Invalidity: A Literature Review’, Boston University International Law Journal 17 (1999), 273.Google Scholar
Port, K., ‘The Impact of Human Rights Law in Japan’, Stanford Journal of International Law 28 (1991), 140.Google Scholar
Qiu, P., Zhiliang, S. and Lifei, C., Chinese Comfort Women: Testimonies from Imperial Japan’s Sex Slaves (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Robertson, C., ‘Ending Impunity: How International Criminal Law Can Put Tyrants on Trial’, Cornell International Law Journal 38 (2005), 649.Google Scholar
Rajan, S., ‘Domestication of International Criminal Law: International Crimes Tribunal of Bangladesh, A Case Study’, ISIL Year Book of International Humanitarian and Refugee Law 12–13 (2013), 132.Google Scholar
Sakamoto, R., ‘The Women’s International War Crimes Tribunal on Japan’s Military Sexual Slavery: A Legal and Feminist Approach to the ‘Comfort Women’ Issue’, New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies 3 (2001), 49.Google Scholar
Say, B., ‘Ripe for Justice: A New UN Tool to Strengthen the Position of the “Comfort Women” and to Corner Japan into Its Reparation Responsibility’, Pennsylvania State International Law Review 23 (2004), 953.Google Scholar
Scharf, M., ‘From the eXile Files: An Essay on Trading Justice for Peace’, Washington and Lee Law Review 63 (2006), 342.Google Scholar
Scharf, M.‘The Letter of the Law: The Scope of the International Legal Obligation to Prosecute Human Rights Crimes’, Law and Contemporary Problems 53 (1996), 60.Google Scholar
Schmidt, D., Ianfu, the Comfort Women of the Japanese Imperial Army of the Pacific War: Broken Silence (Edwin Mellen Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Schmidt, P., ‘Disabled Colonial Veterans of the Imperial Japanese Forces and the Right to Receive Social Welfare Benefits from Japan’, Sydney Law Review 21 (1999), 240.Google Scholar
Se, T. and Karatsu, R. ‘A Conception of Human Rights Based on Japanese Culture: Promoting Cross-Cultural Debates’, Journal of Human Rights 3 (2004), 283.Google Scholar
Seaton, P., Japan’s Contested War Memories: The ‘Memory Rifts’ in Historical (Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar
Seibert-Fohr, A., Prosecuting Serious Human Rights Violations (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Selden, M. and Yoshiko, N., ‘Japanese Textbook Controversies, Nationalism, and Historical Memory: Intra- and Inter-National Conflicts’, The Asia Pacific Journal – Japan Focus 7 (2009).Google Scholar
Sigur Center for Asian Studies at the George Washington University, ‘Korean Comfort Women v. Japan’ (Memory and Reconciliation in the Asia-Pacific) https://memoryreconciliation.org/topics/comfort-women/comfort-women-korea/ accessed 13 September 2017.Google Scholar
Soh, S., The Comfort Women: Sexual Violence and Postcolonial Memory in Korea and Japan (University of Chicago Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Tanaka, Y., “Comfort Women Bashing’ and Japan’s Social Formation’ in Lewis, M. (ed.), ‘History Wars’ and Reconciliation in Japan and Korea: The Roles of Historians, Artists and Activists (Springer, 2016).Google Scholar
Teubner, G., ‘Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Differences’, Modern Law Review 61 (1998), 11.Google Scholar
Totsuka, E., ‘Proposals for Japan and the ROK to Resolve the “Comfort Women” Issue: Creating trust and peace in light of international law’, Asia Pacific Journal: Japan Focus 11 (2013), 1.Google Scholar
The Mainichi, ‘S. Korean Foundation a Vital Bridge to Solve ‘Comfort Women’ Issue’, The Mainichi, 29 August 2016 http://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20160829/p2a/00m/0na/016000 c#csidx54df400df19be84bb8e6ad12acf4533 accessed 13 September 2017.Google Scholar
Tsutomu, N., ‘Behind The Comfort Women Controversy: How Lies Became Truth’ (2007) Society for Dissemination of Historical Fact, www.sdh-fact.com/category/comfort-women/ accessed 5 October 2017.Google Scholar
Twining, W., ‘Diffusion of Law: A Global Perspective’ in Twining, W. General Jurisprudence: Understanding Law from a Global Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Twining, W.‘Social Science and Diffusion of Law’, Journal of Law and Society 32 (2005), 203.Google Scholar
Urabe, N., ‘Rule of Law and Due Process: A Comparative View of the United States and Japan’, Law and Contemporary Problems 53 (1990), 69.Google Scholar
van Boven, T., ‘Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law’ (United Nations Archive, Audiovisual Library of International Law, 16 December 2005) http://legal.un.org/avl/ha/ga_60–147/ga_60–147.html accessed 22 November 2017.Google Scholar
Watson, A.Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law 2nd edn (University of Georgia Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Women’s Caucus for Gender Justice, ‘Re: Judgment of the Women’s International War Crimes Tribunal 2000 for the Trial of Japanese Military Sexual Slavery, ‘In the matter of the Prosecutors and the Peoples of the Asia-Pacific Region v. Emperor Hirohito et al. and the Government of Japan’ (Women’s Caucus for Gender Justice, 2000) www.iccwomen.org/wigjdraft1/Archives/oldWCGJ/tokyo/judgmentannounce.html accessed 12 September 2017.Google Scholar
Zarni, M. and Brinham, N. ‘Reworking the Colonial-Era Indian Peril: Myanmar’s State-Directed Persecution of Rohingyas and Other Muslims’, Brown Journal of World Affairs 24 (2017), 53.Google Scholar
Zhao, B., ‘Land Expropriation, Protest, and Impunity in Rural China’, European Journal of Anthropology 54 (2009), 97.Google Scholar
Zwanenburg, M., ‘The Van Boven / Bassiouni Principles: An Appraisal’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 24 (2006), 641.Google Scholar
Cases
Filartiga v. Pena-Irala, 630 F2d 876 (2d Cir 1980).Google Scholar
Prosecutors and Peoples of Asia Pacific Region v. Hirohito; Prosecutors and Peoples of Asia Pacific Region v. Japan, Summary of Findings and Preliminary Judgment, Women’s International War Crimes Tribunal 2000 (12 December 2000).Google Scholar
International Treaties and Instruments
Agreement on the Settlement of Problems concerning Property and Claims and on Economic Co-Operation between Japan and the Republic of Korea (entered into force 18 December 1965) 583 UNTS 258.Google Scholar
Convention against the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women (entered into force 3 September 1981) 1249 UNTS 13.Google Scholar
International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearance (opened for signature 6 February 2007, entered into force 23 December 2010) 2716 UNTS 3.Google Scholar
International Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity (adopted 26 November 1968, entered into force 11 November 1970) 754 UNTS 73.Google Scholar
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (adopted 16 December 1966, entered into force 23 March 1976) 999 UNTS 171.Google Scholar
Reparations Agreement between Japan and the Philippines (entered into force 9 May 1956) 285 UNTS 3.Google Scholar
Treaty of Peace between Japan and the Republic of Indonesia (entered into force 15 April 1958) 324 UNTS 235 and Reparations Agreement 324 UNTS 247.Google Scholar
Treaty of Peace between the Union of Burma and Japan (entered into force 16 April 1955) 251 UNTS 201.Google Scholar
Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea (entered into force 22 June 1965) 583 UNTS 44.Google Scholar
UNCHR (Sub-Commission), ‘Question of the Impunity of Perpetrators of Violations of Human Rights (Civil and Political Rights): Final Report prepared by Mr L Joinet, pursuant to Subcommission resolution 1995/35’ (29 June 1996) UN Doc E/CN.4/Sub.2/1996/18 annex II ‘Set of Principles for The Protection and Promotion of Human Rights through Action to Combat Impunity’.Google Scholar
UNHRC, ‘Report of the Independent Expert [Diane Orentlicher] to Update the Set of Principles to Combat Impunity’ UN Doc E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1 (8 February 2005) addendum ‘Set of Principles for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights through Action to Combat Impunity’.Google Scholar
World Conference on Human Rights: Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action (adopted 25 June 1993) A/CONF.157/23.Google Scholar
Japanese Government Sources
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, ‘Statement by Chief Cabinet Secretary Koichi Kato on the Issue of the so-called “Wartime Comfort Women” from the Korean Peninsula’ (Japanese Government, 6 July 1992) www.mofa.go.jp/policy/postwar/state9207.html accessed 11 September 2017.Google Scholar
Ministry of Foreign Affairs‘Statement by the Chief Cabinet Secretary Yohei Kono on the result of the study on the issue of “comfort women” (‘Kono Statement’)’ (Japanese Government, 4 August 1993) www.mofa.go.jp/policy/women/fund/state9308.html accessed 11 September 2017.Google Scholar
Ministry of Foreign Affairs‘Statement by Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama on the occasion of the establishment of the “Asian Women’s Fund”’ (Japanese Government, July 1995) www.mofa.go.jp/policy/women/fund/state9507.html accessed 11 September 2017.Google Scholar
Ministry of Foreign Affairs‘Statement by the Chief Cabinet Secretary’ (Japanese Government, 14 June 1995) www.mofa.go.jp/policy/women/fund/state9506.html accessed 11 September 2017.Google Scholar
Ministry of Foreign Affairs‘Announcement by Foreign Ministers of Japan and the Republic of Korea at the Joint Press Occasion’ (Japanese Government, 28 December 2015) www.mofa.go.jp/a_o/na/kr/page4e_000364.html accessed 13 September 2017.Google Scholar
Ministry of Foreign Affairs‘Reply of the Government of Japan to the Letter Sent by the Special Rapporteur for Follow-up to Concluding Observations of the Human Rights Committee’ (Japanese Government, 19 April 2016) www.mofa.go.jp/policy/human/cove_civil/index.html accessed 13 September 2017.Google Scholar
Ministry of Foreign Affairs‘Japan-ROK Foreign Ministers’ Telephone Talk’ (Japanese Government, 12 August 2016) www.mofa.go.jp/a_o/na/kr/page4e_000490.html accessed 13 September 2017.Google Scholar
Non-Governmental and United Nations Sources
Assembly of States Parties to the ICC, ‘Statement by Ambassador Motohide Yoshikawa, at the thirteenth session of the ASP to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court’ (Assembly of States Parties, 11 December 2014) https://asp.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/asp_docs/ASP13/GenDeba/ICC- ASP13-GenDeba-Japan-ENG.pdf accessed 2 October 2017.Google Scholar
UN Committee against Torture, ‘Concluding Observations on the Second Periodic Report of Japan’ (28 June 2013) UN Doc CAT/C/JPN/CO/2.Google Scholar
UNHRC ‘Consideration of Reports Submitted By States Parties under Article 40 of the Covenant : International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: 6th Periodic Report of States Parties: Japan’ (9 October 2012) UN Doc CCPR/C/JPN/6.Google Scholar
UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, ‘Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women’ (12 April 1994) UN Doc A/49/38.Google Scholar
UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women‘Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 18 of the Convention, Seventh and eighth periodic reports of States parties due in 2014: Japan’ (16 September 2014) UN Doc CEDAW/C/JPN/7–8.Google Scholar
UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against WomenConcluding Observations on the Combined Seventh and Eighth Periodic Reports of Japan’ (10 March 2016) UN Doc CEDAW/C/JPN/CO/7–8.Google Scholar
UNCHR, ‘Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences, Ms Radhika Coomaraswamy, in accordance with Commission on Human Rights resolution 1994/45: Report on the mission to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea and Japan on the issue of military sexual slavery in wartime’ (7 February 1996) UN Doc E/CN.4/1996/53/Add. 1/Corr. 1.Google Scholar
UNCHR‘Final report submitted by Ms Gay J McDougall, Special Rapporteur’ (22 June 1998) UN Doc E/CN.4/Sub.2/1998/13.Google Scholar
UNCHR‘Report of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’ (2014) UN Doc A/HRC/25/63.United Nations, ‘Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar: Concrete and Overwhelming Information Points to International Crimes’ (United Nations, 12 March 2018) www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/Pages/NewsDetail.aspx?NewsID=22794&LangID=E accessed 12 April 2018.Google Scholar
VI Bibliography
AdamsJr, R. H. and Page, J, ‘Do International Migration and Remittances Reduce Poverty in Developing Countries?’, World Development 33 (2005), 1645.Google Scholar
Aleman-Castilla, B., ‘The Returns to Temporary Migration to the United States: Evidence from the Mexican Urban Employment Survey’ Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science, 2007.Google Scholar
Alexandru, M., ‘Migration and Social Mobility: A New Perspective on Status Inconsistency’, Romanian Journal of European Studies 5 (2007),153.Google Scholar
Hoang, Anh, Lam, L. T. Brenda, S. Yeoh, A. and Graham, E., ‘Transnational Migration, Changing Care Arrangements and Left-behind Children’s Responses in South-East Asia’, Children’s Geographies 13 (2015), 263.Google Scholar
Agunias, D. R., ‘From a Zero-Sum to a Win-Win Scenario’, Literature Review on Circular Migration (Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute, 2006).Google Scholar
Baldassar, L. and Merla, L. (eds.), Transnational Families, Migration and the Circulation of Care: Understanding Mobility and Absence in Family Life (Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Bauer, T. K. and Sinning, M. G., ‘The Savings Behavior of Temporary and Permanent Migrants in Germany’, Journal of Population Economics 24 (2011), 421.Google Scholar
Boccagni, P., Lafleur, J. and Levitt, P., ‘Transnational Politics as Cultural Circulation: Toward a Conceptual Understanding of Migrant Political Participation on the Move’, Mobilities 11 (2016), 444.Google Scholar
Brickenstein, C., ‘Social Protection of Foreign Seasonal Workers: From State to Best Practice’, Comparative Migration Studies 3 (2015), 2.Google Scholar
Brøndsted Sejersen, T. ‘”I Vow to Thee My Countries”– The Expansion of Dual Citizenship in the 21st Century’, International Migration Review 42 (2008), 523.Google Scholar
Caponio, T., ‘Documenti, Lavoro, Casa: Percorsi di Integrazione non Lineari di Donne Filippine, Marocchine e Rumene in Italia’ STAMPA 85 (2009).Google Scholar
Cassarino, J., ‘Theorising Return Migration: The Conceptual Approach to Return Migrants Revisited’ (2004) http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/2744/04_02.pdf;sequence=1Google Scholar
Castagnone, E., Petrillo, M., Piperno, E., Flavia, R., ‘Madri Migranti: le migrazioni di cura dalla Romania e dall’Ucraina in Italia: percorsi e impatto sui paesi di origine’ (CESPI,2007).Google Scholar
Castles, S., ‘Guestworkers in Europe: A Resurrection?’, International Migration Review 40 (2006), 741.Google Scholar
Castles, S.,‘The Forces Driving Global Migration’, Journal of Intercultural Studies 34 (2013), 140.Google Scholar
Castles, S. and Ozkul, D., ‘Circular Migration: Triple Win, or a New Label for Temporary Migration?’ in Battistella, G. (ed.), Global and Asian Perspectives on International Migration (Springer, 2014).Google Scholar
Danilo, C., Recchia, D., Simoni, M., Zucca, G., ‘Il Welfare Fatto in Casa’ Indagine Nazionale sui Collaboratori Domestici Stranieri che Lavorano a Sostegno delle Famiglie Italiane’ (2007).Google Scholar
Chung, E. A., ‘Workers or Residents? Diverging Patterns of Immigrant Incorporation in Korea and Japan’, Pacific Affairs 83 (2010), 696.Google Scholar
Cingolani, P. and Piperno, F. ‘Il Prossimo Anno a Casa’. Radicamento, Rientro e Percorsi Translocali: Il Caso delle Reti Migratorie Marginea-Torino e Focsani-Roma’ (Rome: CeSPI-FIERI, 2005).Google Scholar
Czaika, M. (ed.), High-Skilled Migration: Drivers and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
De Haas, H., ‘International Migration, Remittances and Development: Myths and Facts’, Third World Quarterly 26 (2005), 1269.Google Scholar
Démurger, S. and Xu, H. ‘Return Migrants: The Rise of New Entrepreneurs in Rural China’, World Development 39 (2011), 1847.Google Scholar
Dustmann, C. ‘Return Migration: The European Experience’, Economic Policy 11 (1996), 213.Google Scholar
Elias, J., ‘Governing Domestic Worker Migration in Southeast Asia: Public–Private Partnerships, Regulatory Grey Zones and the Household’, Journal of Contemporary Asia 48 (2018), 278.Google Scholar
Ewald, W., ‘Comparative Jurisprudence: The Logic of Legal Transplants’, American Journal of Comparative Law 43 (1995), 489.Google Scholar
Fajnzylber, P. and López, H. J., ‘Close to Home: The Development Impact of Remittances in Latin America’ (AGRIS, 2007).Google Scholar
Fouron, G., ‘Haitian Immigrants in the United States’ in Yeoh, B. S. A. Lai, K. P. Y., Charney, M. W., and Kiong, T. C. (eds.), Approaching Transnationalisms (Springer, 2003).Google Scholar
Freeman, G. P., ‘Immigrant Incorporation in Western Democracies’, International Migration Review 38 (2004), 945.Google Scholar
Fullin, G. and Vercelloni, V., ‘Dentro la Trappola. Percezioni e Immagini del Lavoro Domestico e di Cura nei Percorsi delle Donne Immigrate’, Polis 22 (2009), 427.Google Scholar
Galor, O. and Stark, O. ‘Migrants’ Savings, the Probability of Return Migration and Migrants’ Performance’, International Economic Review (1990), 463.Google Scholar
Gang, I. and Bauer, T. K. ‘Temporary Migrants from Egypt: How Long Do They Stay Abroad?’ IZA Discussion paper series, No. 3, Institute for the Study of Labor (Bonn: IZA, 1998).Google Scholar
Gheaus, A., ‘Care Drain: Who Should Provide for the Children Left Behind?’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (2013), 1.Google Scholar
Giuliano, P. and Ruiz-Arranz, M. ‘Remittances, Financial Development, and Growth’, Journal of Development Economics 90 (2009), 144.Google Scholar
Glytsos, N. P., ‘Remitting Behaviour of “Temporary” and “Permanent” Migrants: The Case of Greeks in Germany and Australia’, Labour 11 (1997), 40.Google Scholar
Heyzer, N. and Wee, V., ‘Domestic Workers in Transient Overseas Employment: Who Benefits, Who Profits’, Canadian Woman Studies 15 (1995), 98.Google Scholar
Hugo, G., ‘Effects of International Migration on the Family in Indonesia’, Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 11 (2002), 13.Google Scholar
Hugo, G.,‘A New Paradigm of International Migration: Implications for Migration Policy and Planning in Australia’, Information and Research Services Parliamentary Library (2004), 84.Google Scholar
Hugo, G.,‘Migration in the Asia-Pacific Region’ (Geneva: Global Commission on International Migration, 2005)Google Scholar
Hugo, G.,‘International migration and development in Asia’ 8th International Conference of the Asia Pacific Migration Research Network, Fuzhou, China 25–29 May 2007 (2007).Google Scholar
Hugo, G.,‘Best Practice in Temporary Labour Migration for Development: A Perspective from Asia and the Pacific’, International Migration 47 (2009), 23.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. and Wilcke, C., ‘Caged in and Breaking Loose: Intimate Labor, the State, and Migrant Domestic Workers in Saudi Arabia and Other Arab Countries’ in Friedman, S. Mahdavi, P. (eds.), Migrant Encounters: Intimate Labor, The State and Mobility across Asia (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Junge, V., Revilla, Diez J. and Schätzl, L., ‘Determinants and Consequences of Internal Return Migration in Thailand and Vietnam’, World Development 71 (2015), 94.Google Scholar
Kanchana, R., ‘Is the Kafala Tradition to Blame for the Exploitative Work Conditions in the Arab-Gulf Countries?’ in Chowdhury, M. and Rajan, S. I. (eds.), South Asian Migration in the Gulf (Palgrave Macmillan, 2018).Google Scholar
Karthick Ramakrishnan, S. and Espenshade, T. J., ‘Immigrant Incorporation and Political Participation in the United States’, International Migration Review 35 (2001), 870.Google Scholar
Kofman, E., ‘Citizenship, Migration and the Reassertion of National Identity’, Citizenship Studies 9 (2005), 453.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W., ‘The Rise and Fall of Multiculturalism? New Debates on Inclusion and Accommodation in Diverse Societies’, International Social Science Journal 61 (2010).Google Scholar
Lenard, P. T., ‘Why Temporary Labour Migration Is Not a Satisfactory Alternative to Permanent Migration’, Journal of International Political Theory 8 (2012), 172.Google Scholar
Lenard, P. T. and Straehle, C. (eds.), Legislated Inequality: Temporary Labour Migration in Canada (McGill-Queen’s Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Leogrande, A., Uomini e Caporali: Viaggio tra i Nuovi Schiavi nelle Campagne del Sud (Feltrinelli Editore, 2016).Google Scholar
Mahe, C., ‘Occupational Choice of Return Migrants: Is There a ‘Jack-of-all-trades’ Effect?’, United Nations University-Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT) 39 (2017).Google Scholar
Marchetta, F., ‘Return Migration and the Survival of Entrepreneurial Activities in Egypt’, World Development 40 (2012), 1999.Google Scholar
Maria Hagan, , and Wassink, J. ‘New skills, New Jobs: Return Migration, Skill Transfers, and Business Formation in Mexico’, Social Problems 63 (2016), 513.Google Scholar
Massey, D. S., Pren, K. A. and Durand, J. ‘Why Border Enforcement Backfired’, American Journal of Sociology 121 (2016), 1557.Google Scholar
McCormick, B. and Wahba, J. ‘Overseas Work Experience, Savings and Entrepreneurship amongst Return Migrants to LDCs’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy 48 (2001), 164.Google Scholar
Messina, A. M., Asylum, Residency and Citizenship Policies and Models of Migrant Incorporation’ Migration and Health in the European Union (Open University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Miller, J. M., ‘A Typology of Legal Transplants: Using Sociology, Legal History and Argentine Examples to Explain the Transplant Process’, American Journal of Comparative Law 51 (2003), 839.Google Scholar
Morokvasic, M., ‘Transnational Mobility and Gender: A View from Post-Wall Europe’ in Morokvasic, Mirjana, Erel, Umut and Shinozaki, Kyoko (eds.), Crossing Borders and Shifting Boundaries (VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2003), 101.Google Scholar
Murray, H. E., ‘Hope for Reform Springs Eternal: How the Sponsorship System, Domestic Laws and Traditional Customs Fail to Protect Migrant Domestic Workers in GCC Countries’, Cornell International Law Journal 45 (2013), 461.Google Scholar
Newbold, B. K., ‘Counting Migrants and Migrations: Comparing Lifetime and Fixed‐Interval Return and Onward Migration’, Economic Geography 77 (2001), 23.Google Scholar
Ottonelli, V. and Torresi, T. ‘Temporary Migration Projects and Children’s Education’ Notizie di Politeia (2010).Google Scholar
Ottonelli, V. and Torresi, T.‘Inclusivist Egalitarian Liberalism and Temporary Migration: A Dilemma’, Journal of Political Philosophy 20 (2012), 202.Google Scholar
Ottonelli, V. and Torresi, T.‘When Is Migration Voluntary?’, International Migration Review 47 (2013), 783.Google Scholar
Ottonelli, V. and Torresi, T.‘Temporary Migration Projects and Voting Rights’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (2014), 580.Google Scholar
Ottonelli, V. and Torresi, T.‘Temporary Migration, Identity and Allegiance’ in Jenkins, Fiona, Nolan, Mark and Rubinstein, Kim (eds.), Allegiance and Identity in a Globalised World (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Ottonelli, V. and Torresi, T.‘Temporary Migration and the Shortcomings of Citizenship’ in Solé, Carlota, Parella, Sonia, Nita, Sonja and Martí, Teresa Sordé (eds.), Impact of Circular Migration on Human, Political and Civil Rights (Springer, 2016).Google Scholar
Parreñas, R. S.,Children of Global Migration: Transnational Families and Gendered Woes (Stanford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Pruthi, S., ‘Social Ties and Venture Creation by Returnee Entrepreneurs’, International Business Review 23 (2014), 1139.Google Scholar
Ramji-Nogales, J., ‘Under the Canopy: Migration Governance in Southeast Asia’, UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs 21 (2017), 10.Google Scholar
Ratha, D. and Shaw, W., South-South Migration and Remittances, The World Bank (2007) http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.576.4220&rep=rep1&type=pdf.Google Scholar
Reid-Musson, E., ‘Grown Close to Home: Migrant Farmworker (Im)mobilities and Unfreedom on Canadian Family Farms’, Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107 (2017), 716.Google Scholar
Rother, S. ‘Labour Migration in Southeast Asia: In Search of Regional Governance’ in Ba, A. D. and Beeson, M. (eds.), Contemporary Southeast Asia: The Politics of Change, Contestation, and Adaptation (Palgrave, 2018).Google Scholar
Sayad, A., La double Absence: Des Illusions de l’émigré aux Souffrances de l’immigré (Seuil, 2000).Google Scholar
Solomon, M. S., ‘State-led Migration, Democratic Legitimacy, and Deterritorialization: The Philippines’ Labour Export Model’, European Journal of East Asian Studies 8 (2009), 275.Google Scholar
Soysal, N. Y., Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe (University of Chicago Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Strauss, K. and McGrath, S. ‘Temporary Migration, Precarious Employment and Unfree Labour Relations: Exploring the ‘Continuum of Exploitation’ in Canada’s Temporary Foreign Worker Program’, Geoforum 78 (2017), 199.Google Scholar
Stoll, M. A. and Wong, J. S. ‘Immigration and Civic Participation in a Multiracial and Multiethnic Context’, International Migration Review 41 (2007), 880.Google Scholar
Uccellini, C. M., ‘Outsiders after Accession: The Case of Romanian Migrants in Italy, 1989–2009’, Political Perspectives 4 (2010), 70.Google Scholar
Wahba, J. and Zenou, Y., ‘Out of Sight, Out of Mind: Migration, Entrepreneurship and Social Capital’, Regional Science and Urban Economics 42 (2012), 890.Google Scholar
Ware, H., ‘Melanesian Seasonal Migration as a Potential Contribution to Security’, Global Change Peace and Security 19 (2007), 221.Google Scholar
Woodruff, C. and Zenteno, R., ‘Migration Networks and Microenterprises in Mexico’, Journal of Development Economics 82 (2007), 509.Google Scholar
ZhangSun, O. XinZhi, Z., RunQun, W., Feng, L., AiGuo, S. and XingLin, W., ‘Typical Survey and Research on Returning-Home Migrant Workers’ Entrepreneurship in Jiangxi Province under Post-Financial crisis’, Asian Agricultural Research 2 (2010), 34.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.