Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T18:28:37.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - A Kinesiological Approach to Gesture Analysis

from Part II - Ways of Approaching Gesture Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2024

By
Dominique Boutet  and
Alan Cienki
Edited by
Alan Cienki
Alan Cienki
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

The classical approach to gesture and sign language analysis focuses on the forms and locations of the hands. This constitutes an external point of view on the gesturing subject. The kinesiological approach presented in this chapter looks at gesture from the inside out, at how it is produced, taking a first-person perspective. This involves a physiological description of the parts of the body that are moving (the segments) and the joints at which they can move (providing the degrees of freedom of movement). This type of analysis allows for such distinctions of proper movement of segments from displacement caused by movement of another segment. Movement is distinguished according to muscular properties such as flexion versus extension, abduction versus adduction, exterior versus interior rotation, and supination versus pronation. The propagation of movement in the body is considered in terms of its flow across connected segments of the body, from more proximal to more distal segments or vice versa. These distinctions distinguish different functions of gestures (e.g. showing that you don’t care vs. expressing negation) and different meanings of signs in a sign language.

Keywords

action schemabonesdegrees of freedomgesture analysisiconicitykinesiologymovement flowmusclessign language
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Gesture Studies , pp. 273 - 305
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrete, G. S. (1999). Gestures and acclamations in Ancient Rome. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bébian, R.-A. A. (1826). Mimographie, ou Essai d’écriture mimique propre à régulariser le langage des sourds-muets [Mimography, or An attempt at mimic writing suitable for regularizing the language of deaf-mutes]. Paris, France: Imprimerie de Regnoux.Google Scholar
Bottineau, D. (2012). Parole, corporéité, individu et société – l’embodiment dans les linguistiques cognitives [Speech, corporality, the individual, and society – embodiment in cognitive linguistics]. Texto!, 17(1 & 2), 1–30. www.revue-texto.net/index.php?id=2973Google Scholar
Boutet, D. (2010). Structuration physiologique de la gestuelle: Modèle et tests [Physiological structuring of gestures: Model and tests] . Lidil, 42, 77–96. https://doi.org/10.4000/lidil.3070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutet, D. (2018). Pour une approche kinésiologique de la gestualité [Towards a kinesiological approach to gestures] [Unpublished habilitation thesis]. University of Rouen Normandy, France. Retrieved from https://theses.hal.science/tel-02357282/Google Scholar
Boutet, D., Jégo, J.-F., & Meyrueis, V. (2018). POLIMOD Pipeline: Documentation. Motion capture, visualization & data analysis for gesture studies. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal–01950466/Google Scholar
Boutet, D., & Morgenstern, A. (2020). Prélude et Ode à une approche kinésiologique de la gestualité [Prelude and Ode to a kinesiological approach to gestures]. TIPA. Travaux Interdisciplinaires du Laboratoire Parole et Langage d’Aix-en-Provence, 36. https://doi.org/10.4000/tipa.3892Google Scholar
Boutet, D., Morgenstern, A., & Cienki, A. (2018a). Looking ahead: Kinesiological analysis. In Cienki, A. & Iriskhanova, O. K. (Eds.), Aspectuality across languages: Event construal in speech and gesture (pp. 143–159). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. https://benjamins.com/catalog/hcp.62.c5Google Scholar
Boutet, D., Morgenstern, A., & Cienki, A. (2018b). Speakers’ gestural expression of event construal: Quantitative and qualitative analyses. In Cienki, A. & Iriskhanova, O. K. (Eds.), Aspectuality across languages: Event construal in speech and gesture (pp. 107–142). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. https://benjamins.com/catalog/hcp.62.c5Google Scholar
Brentari, D. (1998). A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Browman, C. P., Goldstein, L., Kelso, J. A. S., Rubin, P., & Saltzman, E. (1984). Articulatory synthesis from underlying dynamics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75(S1), S22–S23. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2021330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulwer, J. (1644). Chirologia: Or the naturall language of the hand. Composed of the speaking motions, and discoursing gestures thereof. Whereunto is added Chironomia: Or, the art of manuall rhetoricke. Consisting of the naturall expressions, digested by art in the hand, as the chiefest instrument of eloquence. London, UK: Thomas Harper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calbris, G. (1990). The semiotics of French gestures. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Calbris, G., & Montredon, J. (1986). Des gestes et des mots pour le dire [Gestures and words to say it]. Paris, France: Clé International.Google Scholar
Caradec, F. (2005). Dictionnaire des gestes: Attitudes et mouvements expressifs en usage dans le monde entier [Dictionary of gestures: Attitudes and expressive movements in use around the world]. Paris, France: Fayard.Google Scholar
Cienki, A. (2021). From the finger lift to the palm-up open hand when presenting a point: A methodological exploration of forms and functions. Languages and Modalities, 1, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.3897/lamo.1.68914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Codman, E. A. (1934). The shoulder: Rupture of the supraspinatus tendon and other lesions in or about the subacromial bursa. Boston, MA: Thomas Todd Co.Google Scholar
Cuxac, C. (2000). La langue des signes française (LSF): Les voies de l’iconicité [French Sign Language (LSF): The paths of iconicity]. Paris, France: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1998). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1872)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debras, C. (2017). The shrug. Gesture, 16(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.1.01debCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumas, R., Chèze, L., & Verriest, J.-P. (2007). Adjustments to McConville et al. and Young et al. Body segment inertial parameters. Journal of Biomechanics, 40(3), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.02.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Efron, D. (1972). Gesture, race and culture. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton. (Original work published 1942)Google Scholar
Events and Gestures (n.d.). The project “Verbal and co-verbal means of event construal across languages.” Retrieved from http://scodis.com/our-projects/events-and-gestures/Google Scholar
Garnier, F. (1989). Le langage de l’image au Moyen Age II: Grammaire des gestes [The language of images in the Middle Ages II: A grammar of gestures] (Vol. 2). Paris, France: Le Léopard d’or.Google Scholar
Gosselin, L. (2005). Temporalité et modalité [Temporality and modality]. Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: De Boeck Supérieur.Google Scholar
Guignard, J.-B. (2008). Le corps et l’idée ou les simulacres d’incarnation: Le cas de la linguistique cognitive [The body and the idea or simulacra of incarnation: The case of cognitive linguistics]. HAL. http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs–00401736Google Scholar
Hoiting, N., & Slobin, D. I. (2002). Transcription as a tool for understanding: The Berkeley Transcription System for sign language research (BTS). In Morgan, G. & Woll, B. (Eds.), Directions in sign language acquisition (pp. 55–75). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, E. (1931). Méditations Cartésiennes: Introduction à la Phénoménologie [Cartesian meditations: Introduction to phenomenology]. Paris, France: Vrin.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. E., & Liddell, S. K. (2010). Toward a phonetic representation of signs: Sequentiality and contrast. Sign Language Studies, 11(2), 241–274. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2010.0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. E., & Liddell, S. K. (2011). Toward a phonetic representation of hand configuration: The fingers. Sign Language Studies, 12(1), 5–45. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2011.0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1768/1991). On the first ground of the distinction of regions in space. In van Cleve, J. & Frederick, R. E. (Eds.), The philosophy of right and left (pp. 27–33). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Spring Science+Business Media.Google Scholar
Kapandji, I. A. (1997). Physiologie articulaire. 1, Membre supérieur [Joint physiology. 1, The upper limb]. Paris, France: Maloine.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1972). Some relationships between body motion and speech. An analysis of an example. In Siegman, A. W., & Pope, B. (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication (pp. 177–210). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kita, S., van Gijn, I., & van der Hulst, H. (1998). Movement phases in signs and co-speech gestures, and their transcription by human coders. In Wachsmuth, I. & Fröhlich, M. (Eds.), Gesture and sign language in human-computer interaction (pp. 23–35). Berlin, Germany: Spring.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In Bloom, P., Peterson, M. A., Nadel, L., & Garrett, M. F. (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 109–169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, S. K. (2003). Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacConaill, M. A. (1946). Studies in the mechanics of synovial joints: Fundamental principles and diadochal movements. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 21(6), 190–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacConaill, M. A. (1948). The movements of bones and joints. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, British Volume, 30 -B(2), 322–326.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1972). Phénoménologie de la perception [The phenomenology of perception]. Paris, France: Gallimard. (Original work published 1945)Google Scholar
Morgenstern, A., Chevrefils, L., Blondel, M., Vincent, C. Thomas, C., Jégo, J.-F., & Boutet, D. (2021). “Of thee I sing”: An opening to Dominique Boutet’s kinesiological approach to gesture. Languages and Modalities, 1, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.3897/lamo.1.68148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C. (2014). Gestural modes of representation as techniques of depiction. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1687–1702). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2018). How recurrent gestures mean. Gesture, 16(2), 277–304. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.05mulCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prillwitz, S., Leven, R., Zienert, H., Hanke, T., & Henning, J. (1989). Hamburg notation system for sign languages: An introductory guide. Hamburg, Germany: Signum Press.Google Scholar
Quintilian, , & Cousin, J. (2003). Institution oratoire. Tome VI, Livre X et XI [Oratory institution. Volume VI, Book X and XI]. Paris, France: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Radden Keefe, B. (2021). The illustrated afterlife of Terence’s comedies (800–1200). Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richir, M. (2005). Symétrie chirale et constitution de l’espace [Chiral symmetry and the constitution of space]. In Siksou, M. (Ed.), Symétries: Symétries et symmetries du vivant [Symmetries: Symmetries and symmetries of life] (pp. 21–27). Paris, France: Hermès. Lavoisier.Google Scholar
Sandler, W. (1989). Phonological representation of the sign: Linearity and nonlinearity in American Sign Language. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spicer, J. (1991). The Renaissance elbow. In Bremmer, J. & Roodenburg, H. (Eds.), A cultural history of gesture from antiquity to the present day (pp. 84–128). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Stokoe, W. C. (2005). Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American Deaf. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eni001 (Original work published 1960 in Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Papers 8, Department of Anthropology and Linguistics, University at Buffalo, NY).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, V. (1995). Lessons in SignWriting: Textbook. La Jolla, CA: Deaf Action Committee. https://www.signwriting.org/lessons/lessons.htmlGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×