Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T14:55:01.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 1 - Introduction to and History of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2022

By
Gabor T. Kovacs
Edited by
Gabor T. Kovacs ,
Bart Fauser  and
Richard S. Legro
Gabor T. Kovacs
Affiliation:
Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Bart Fauser
Affiliation:
University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
Richard S. Legro
Affiliation:
Penn State Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
Get access

Summary

Although the modern history of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) started with the pivotal paper by Stein and Leventhal in 1935,[1] there are suggestions that the “syndrome” was referred to as early as in the time of Hippocrates (ca. 460–377 BC). Medical notes at the time referred to women “whose menstruation is less than three days or is meager, are robust, with a healthy complexion and a masculine appearance; yet they are not concerned about bearing children nor do they become pregnant” and suggest that they may have been describing women with PCOS.[2]

Type
Chapter
Information
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome , pp. 1 - 7
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Stein, I. F. and Leventhal, M. L. Amenorrhoea associated with bilateral polycystic ovaries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1935; 29(2): 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azziz, R. Dumesic, D. A. and Goodarzi, M. O. Polycystic ovary syndrome: An ancient disorder? Fertil Steril 2011; 95(5): 1544–1548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darby, A. Irving Freiler Stein Sr. (1887–1976). Embryo Project Encyclopedia, July 20, 2017. http://embryo.asu.edu/handle/10776/12956Google Scholar
Azziz, R. and Adashi, E. Y. Stein and Leventhal: 80 years on. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; (214) 2: 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, I. F. Duration of fertility following ovarian wedge resection: Stein-Leventhal syndrome. West J Surg Obstet Gynecol 1964; 72: 237–242.Google Scholar
Lunde, O., Djoseland, O. and Grottum, P. Polycystic ovarian syndrome: A follow-up study on fertility and menstrual pattern in 149 patients 15–25 years after ovarian wedge resection. Hum Reprod 2001; 16(7): 1479–1485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenblatt, R. B., Barfield, W. E. and Jungck, E. C. Induction of ovulation with MRL/41: Preliminary report. JAMA 1961; 178: 101–104.Google Scholar
Gemzell, C. A., Diczfalusy, E. and Tillinger, G. Clinical effect of human pituitary follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1958; 18(12): 1333–1348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toaff, R., Toaff, M. E., Peyser, M. R. Infertility following wedge resection of the ovaries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1976; 124(1): 92–96.Google Scholar
Goldzieher, J. W. and Green, J. A. The polycystic ovary: I. Clinical and histological features. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1962; 22: 325–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yen, S. S. C., Vela, P. and Rankin, J. Inappropriate secretion of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone in polycystic ovarian disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1970; 30: 442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swanson, M., Sauerbrei, E. E. and Cooperberg, P. L. Medical implications of ultrasonically detected polycystic ovaries. J Clin Ultrasound 1981; 9(5): 219–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adams, J., Polson, D. W. and Franks, S. Prevalence of polycystic ovaries in women with anovulation and idiopathic hirsutism. Br Med J 1986; 293(6543): 355–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM‐Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long‐term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod 2004; 19(1): 41–47.Google Scholar
Lowe, P., Kovacs, G. and Howlett, D. Incidence of polycystic ovaries and polycystic ovary syndrome amongst women in Melbourne, Australia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 45(1): 17–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, C. L. et al. Relationship between serum müllerian-inhibiting substance and other reproductive hormones in untreated women with polycystic ovary syndrome and normal women. Fertil Steril 2002; 77(1): 141–146.Google Scholar
Teede, H., Misso, M. , Costello, M. et al. International Evidence-Based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Melbourne: Monash University and NHMRC, Centre for Research Excellence in PCOS and the Australian PCOS Alliance, 2018.Google Scholar
Zawadski, J. K. and Dunaif, A. Diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome: Towards a rational approach. In Dunaif, A., Givens, J. R., Haseltine, F. P. and Merriam, G. R., eds. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Boston, MA: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1992: 377–384.Google Scholar
The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Consensus on infertility treatment related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2008; 89(3): 505–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Amsterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored 3rd PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Consensus on women’s health aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod 2011; 27(1): 14–24.Google Scholar
Teede, H., Misso, M. L., Deeks, A. A. et al. Assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome: summary of an evidence-based guideline. Med J Aust 2011; 195(6): S65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conway, G., Dewailly, D., Diamanti-Kandarakis, E. et al. The polycystic ovary syndrome: A position statement from the European Society of Endocrinology. Eur J Endocrinol 2014; 171: P1–29.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. F., Cobin, R. H., Futterweit, W. et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology, and Androgen Excess and PCOS Society disease state clinical review: Guide to the best practices in the evaluation and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome–part 1. Endocr Pract 1915; 21(11): 1291–1300.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×