Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T15:04:58.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2017

Li-fang Zhang
Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abikoff, H. (1979). Cognitive training interventions in children: Review of a new approach. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12 (2), 6577.Google Scholar
Abraham, A., Pieritz, K., Thybusch, K., Rutter, B., Kroger, S., Schweckendiek, J., . . . & Hermann, C. (2012). Creativity and the brain: Uncovering the neural signature of conceptual expansion. Neuropsychologia, 50, 19061917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alamolhodaei, H. (2009). A working memory model applied to mathematical word problem solving. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10 (2), 183192.Google Scholar
Albaili, M. A. (1996). Inferred hemispheric style and problem-solving performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83, 427434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alevriadou, A., Hatzinikolaou, K., Tsakiridou, H., & Grouios, G. (2004). Field dependence-independence of normally developing and mentally retarded boys of low and upper/middle socioeconomic status. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 99 (3), 913923.Google Scholar
Alexander, D. A., & Klein, S. (2001). Ambulance personnel and critical incidents. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178, 7681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allinson, C. W., & Hayes, J. (1996). The Cognitive Style Index: A measure of intuition-analysis for organizational research. Journal of Management Studies, 33 (1), 119135.Google Scholar
Allinson, C. W., Armstrong, S. J., & Hayes, J. (2001). The effects of cognitive style on leader member exchange: A study of manager-subordinate dyads. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 201220.Google Scholar
Allred, K. D., & Smith, T. W. (1989). The hardy personality: Cognitive and physiological responses to evaluative threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 257266.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1979). Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 221233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview-Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Amador-Campos, J. A., & Kirchner-Nebot, T. (1999). Correlations among scores on measures of field dependence-independence cognitive style, cognitive ability, and sustained attention. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 236239.Google Scholar
Amador-Campos, J. A., (2001). Children’s embedded figures test and matching familiar figures test-20: Factorial structure for boys and girls from 6 to 11 years old. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 93 (3), 709712.Google Scholar
American Council on Education (1937). Student Personnel Point of View. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Amidon, E. J., & Flanders, N. A. (1963). The role of the teacher in the classroom. Minneapolis, MN: Paul S. Amidon & Associates.Google Scholar
Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Angeli, C. (2013). Examining the effects of field dependence-independence on learners’ problem-solving performance and interaction with a computer modeling tool: Implications for the design of joint cognitive systems. Computers & Education, 62, 221230.Google Scholar
Angeli, C., Valanides, N., & Kirschner, P. (2009). Field dependence–independence and instructional-design effects on learners’ performance with a computer-modeling tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 25 (6), 13551366.Google Scholar
Antonietti, A., & Gioletta, M. A. (1995). Individual differences in analogical problem solving. Personality and Individual Differences, 18 (5), 611619.Google Scholar
Aragones, A. O. (2001). Burnout among doctoral-level psychologists: A study of coping alternatives. Dissertation Abstracts International (Section B): The Sciences and Engineering, 61 (7B), 3886.Google Scholar
Armstrong, S. J. (1999). Cognitive style and dyadic interaction: A study of supervisors and subordinates engaged in working relationships. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Leeds, UK.Google Scholar
Armstrong, S. J., & Hird, A. (2009). Cognitive style and entrepreneurial drive of new and mature business owner-managers. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24 (4), 419430.Google Scholar
Arteche, A., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Ackerman, P., & Furnham, A. (2009). Typical intellectual engagement as a by-product of openness, learning approaches, and self-assessed intelligence. Educational Psychology, 29 (3), 357367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atherton, M. (2005). Applying the neurosciences to educational research: Can cognitive neuroscience bridge the gap? Part I. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montréal, Canada, April.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Australian Council for Educational Research (1981). ACER higher tests ML-MQ and PL-PQ manual (2nd ed.). Hawthorn, Victoria: Author.Google Scholar
Backhaus, K., & Liff, J. P. (2007). Cognitive style index: Further investigation of the factor structure with an American student sample. Educational Psychology, 27(1), 2131.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. (1968). A 3 min reasoning test based on grammatical transformation. Psychonomic Science, 10, 341342.Google Scholar
Bailey, W., Hustmyer, F., & Kristofferson, A. (1961). Alcoholism, brain damage and perceptual dependence. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 22, 387393.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In Vasta, R. (Ed.), Annals of child development (Vol. 6): Six theories of child development (pp. 160). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, R. (2011). Learning about learning: A conundrum and a possible resolution. London Review of Education, 9 (1), 513.Google Scholar
Bar-On, R. (1997). Bar-on emotional quotient inventory: Technical manual. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
Barratt, W. R., & Hood, A. B. (1997). Assessing development of purpose. In Hood, A. B. (Ed.), The Iowa student development inventories (2nd ed.) (pp. 7892). Iowa City, IA: HITECH Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, , L. A. (1991). Relationship of observable teaching effectiveness behaviors to MBTI personality types. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference for Psychological Type. Richmond, VA, July. ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 336 357.Google Scholar
Barron, F. (1955). The disposition towards originality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 478485.Google Scholar
Barron, F. (1963). Barron-Welsh art scale, a portion of the Welsh figure preference test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Barron, F., & Welsh, G. S. (1952). Artistic perception as a possible factor in personality style: Its measurement by a figure preference test. Journal of Psychology, 33, 199203.Google Scholar
Bartone, P. T., Ursano, R. J., Wright, K. M., Ingraham, L. H. (1989). The impact of a military air disaster on the health of assistance workers: A prospective research. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 177, 6, 317328.Google Scholar
Bartram, D. (1992). The personality of UK managers: 16PF norms for short-listed applicants. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65 (2), 156173.Google Scholar
Bartsch, C., Weiss, M., & Kipper, S. (2015). Multiple song features are related to paternal effort in common nightingales. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 15, 115122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bass, B. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bass, B., & Avolio, B. (1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Baumrind, D. (1966). Effects of authoritative control on child behavior. Child Development, 37 (4), 887–907.Google Scholar
Beane, A., Lipka, R. P., & Ludewig, J. W. (1980). Synthesis of research on self concept. Educational Leadership, 38(1), 8089.Google Scholar
Beck, A. T., Kovacs, M., & Weissman, A. (1979). Assessment of suicidal intention: The Scale for Suicide Ideation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 343352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, H. S. (1960). Note on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 3242.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 7379.Google Scholar
Bennett, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. (1961). Differential Aptitude Tests – Form M. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Biggs, J. B. (1978). Individual and group differences in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 48, 266279.Google Scholar
Barron, F. (1979). Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education, 8, 381–394.Google Scholar
Barron, F. (1987). Study process questionnaire manual. Hawthorne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Biggs, J. B. (1992). Why and how do Hong Kong students learn? Using the Learning and Study Process Questionnaires, Education Paper No. 14, Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Biggs, J. B., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133149.Google Scholar
Blinkhorn, S. F. (1985). Graduate and managerial assessment manual and user guide. Dorchester, UK: Dorset.Google Scholar
Bliuc, A., Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., & Hendres, D. M. (2011). The role of social identification as university student in learning: Relationships between students’ social identity, approaches to learning, and academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 31 (5), 559574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, J. (1961). The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, J., Block, J. H., & Harrington, D. M. (1974). Some misgivings about the Matching Familiar Figures Test as a measure of reflection-impulsivity. Developmental Psychology, 11, 611632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.Google Scholar
Bloomberg, M. (1967). An inquiry into the relationship between field independence-dependence and creativity. Journal of Psychology, 67, 127140.Google Scholar
Bloomberg, M. (1971). Creativity as related to field independence and mobility. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 118, 312.Google Scholar
Bogo, N., Winget, C., & Gleser, G. C. (1970). Ego defenses and perceptual styles. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 30, 599605.Google Scholar
Bonetta, L. (2011). Advancing in industry: Choosing among many paths. Science, 332 (6036), 14511454.Google Scholar
Bordage, G., Grant, J., & Marsden, P. (1990). Quantitative assessment of diagnostic ability. Medical Education, 24 (5), 413425.Google Scholar
Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar (NEO-FFI). Göttomgen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Borys, S. V., & Spitz, H. H. (1979). Reflection–impulsivity in retarded adolescents and nonretarded children of equal MA. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 82 (6), 601604.Google Scholar
Bosacki, S., Innerd, W., & Towson, S. (1997). Field independence-dependence and self-esteem in preadolescents: Does gender make a difference? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26 (6), 691703.Google Scholar
Bown, O. H., & Richek, H. G. (1969). Teachers-to-be: Extraversion/introversion and self-perceptions. The Elementary School Journal, 70 (3), 164170.Google Scholar
Brannigan, G. G., Ash, T., & Margolis, H. (1980). Impulsivity-reflectivity and children’s intellectual performance. Journal of Personality Assessment, 44 (1), 4143.Google Scholar
Brickenkamp, R. (1994). Test d2 Aufmerksamkeits-Belastungs Test. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Briggs, K. C., & Myers, I. B. (1976). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Form F. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Briggs, K. C., (1977). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting PsychologistsPress.Google Scholar
Briggs, K. C., (1987). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Form G. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Briggs, K. C., (1998). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Form M Self-Scorable (Rev. ed.), Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Brightman, H. J., & Sayeed, L. (1990). The pervasiveness of senior management's view of the cultural gaps within a division. Group & Organization Management, 15 (3), 266–278.Google Scholar
Broberg, G. C., & Moran, J. D., III (1988). Creative potential and conceptual tempo in preschool children. Creative Research Journal, 1, 115121.Google Scholar
Brodzinsky, D. M. (1975). The role of conceptual tempo and stimulus characteristics in children’s humor development. Developmental Psychology, 11 (6), 843850.Google Scholar
Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1969). Teacher-child dyadic interaction: A manual for coding classroom behavior. Austin: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas.Google Scholar
Brophy, J. E., (1970). Teachers’ communication of differential expectations for children’s classroom performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61 (5), 365374.Google Scholar
Brown, F. W., & Reilly, M. D. (2009). The Myers-Briggs type indicator and transformational leadership. Journal of Management Development, 28 (10), 916932.Google Scholar
Brown, I. S., & Walter, I. M. (1993). Problem posing: Reflections and applications. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Brown, W., & Holtzman, W. (1967). Manual – Survey of study habits and attitudes. New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Bruch, H. (1978). The golden cage: The enigma of anorexia nervosa. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Budd, R. J. (1993a). General, critical, and graduate test battery: The technical manual. Letchworth: Psytech International Limited.Google Scholar
Budd, R. J. (1993b). Jung Type Indicator: The technical manual. Letchworth: Psytech International Limited.Google Scholar
Budner, S. (1962). Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality, 30, 2950.Google Scholar
Burks, H. F. (1960). The hyperkinetic child. Exceptional Child, 27, 1826.Google Scholar
Burns, , J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Burt, R. B. (1968). An exploratory study of personality manifestations in paintings. (PhD diss., Duke University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 29, 1493B. University Microfilms No. 68–14, 298.Google Scholar
Cabral, G., & Joyce, M. H. (1991). Managers and psychological type in an industrial setting: Sex differences and similarities, managerial level and age. Journal of Psychological Type, 21, 40–53.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J., & Petty, R. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 116131.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J., & Petty, R., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment for need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306307.Google Scholar
Cairns, E. D. (1977). The reliability of the Matching Familiar Figures Test. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47 (2), 197198.Google Scholar
Cairns, E. D., & Cammock, T. (1978). Development of a more reliable version of the Matching Familiar Figures Test. Developmental Psychology, 14 (5), 555560.Google Scholar
CallisterJr., T. A., & Barbules, N. C. (1990). Computer literacy programs in teacher education: What teachers really need to learn. Computers in Education, 14 (1), 37.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. E., & Kain, J. M. (1990). Personality type and mode of information presentation: Preference, accuracy, and efficiency in problem solving. Journal of Psychological Type, 20, 47–51.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, S. B. (1973). Cognitive styles in reflective impulsive and hyperactive boys and their mothers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 36 (3), 747752.Google Scholar
Campbell, S. B., & Douglas, V. I. (1972). Cognitive styles and responses to the threat of frustration. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 4 (1), 3042.Google Scholar
Campbell, S. B., Douglas, V. I., & Morgenstern, G. (1971). Cognitive styles in hyperactive children and the effect of methylphenidate. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 12 (1), 5567.Google Scholar
Campos, R. C., Besser, A., & Blatt, S. J. (2011). The relationships between defenses and experiences of depression. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 28 (2), 196208.Google Scholar
Caplan, G. (1964). Principles of preventive psychiatry. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Steca, P. (2003). Efficacy beliefs as determinants of teachers’ job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 821832.Google Scholar
Carless, S. A. (1999). Career assessment: Holland’s vocational interests, personality characteristics, and abilities. Journal of Career Assessment, 7 (2), 125144.Google Scholar
Carson, S., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 3750.Google Scholar
Carter, H., & Loo, R. (1979). Relationships between field dependence and Eysenck’s personality dimensions. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 103 (1), 4549.Google Scholar
Case, R., & Pascual-Leone, J. (1975). Failure of conservation training of disadvantaged black teenagers: A neo-Piagetian interpretation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 40, 545546.Google Scholar
Casper, R. C., Hedeker, D., & McClough, J. F. (1992). Personality dimensions in eating disorders and their relevance for subtyping. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 31 (5), 830840.Google Scholar
Cassidy, S., and Eachus, P.. 2000. Learning style, academic belief systems, self-report student proficiency and academic achievement in higher education. Educational Psychology, 20, 308–22.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B. (1969). Is field independence an expression of the general personality source trait of independence, U. I. 19? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 28, 865–866.Google Scholar
Cattell, R. B., & Cattell, M. D. (1973). Measuring intelligence with the Culture Fair Tests. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Test. Spanish version (1977–1990): Tests de factor g. Escalas 2 y 3. Madrid: TEA.Google Scholar
Chambers, S. M., Hardy, J. C., Smith, B. J., & Sienty, S. F. (2003). Personality indicators and emergency permit teachers’ willingness to embrace technology. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 30 (3), 185188.Google Scholar
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2008). Personality, intelligence and approaches to learning as predictors of academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 44 (7), 15961603.Google Scholar
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., (2009). Mainly openness: The relationship between the Big Five personality traits and learning approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 524529.Google Scholar
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Furnham, A., & Lewis, M. (2007). Personality and approaches to learning predict preference for different teaching methods. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 241250.Google Scholar
Chen, G. H. (2000). An empirical study on some issues of teaching evaluation by university students. International Conference “New Millennium: Quality & Innovations in Higher Education.” Hong Kong, December 4–5.Google Scholar
Chen, G. H. (2007). University teachers’ humor production in the classroom and student ratings of teaching effectiveness. Unpublished PhD diss., The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Chen, G. H., & Zhang, L. F. (2010). Mental health and thinking styles in Sternberg’s theory: An exploratory study. Psychological Reports, 103 (3), 784794.Google Scholar
Cheng, S. Y. (2014) Intellectual styles and their influence on university success among students with and without hearing impairment. Unpublished PhD diss., The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Cheng, S. Y., & Zhang, L. F. (in press). Thinking styles and quality of university life among deaf, hard-of-hearing, and hearing students. American Annals of the Deaf.Google Scholar
Cheng, S. Y., Zhang, L. F., & Hu, X. (2015). Thinking styles and university self-efficacy among deaf, hard-of-hearing, and hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education (August), 110.Google ScholarPubMed
Chenhall, R., & Morris, D. (1991). The effect of cognitive style and sponsorship bias on the treatment of opportunity costs in resource allocation decisions. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 16, 2746.Google Scholar
Chickering, A. (1969). Education and identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Choong, S., & Britton, K. (2007). Character strengths and type: Exploration of covariation. International Coaching Psychology Review, 2 (1), 923.Google Scholar
Christensen, P. E., Merrifield, P. R., & Guilford, J. P. (1953). Consequences Form A-1. Beverly Hills, CA: Sheridan Supply.Google Scholar
Clapp, R. G. (1993). The stability of cognitive style in adults and some implications: A longitudinal study of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. Psychological Reports, 73 (3), 12351245.Google Scholar
Clark, B. R., & Trow, M. (1966). The organizational context. In Newcomb, T. M. & Wilson, E. K. (Eds.), College peer groups: Problems and prospects for research (pp. 1770). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Clark, E. H. (1980). An analysis of occupational stress factors as perceived by public school teachers. Unpublished PhD diss., Auburn University.Google Scholar
Cloninger, C. R., Przybeck, T. R., Svaric, D. M., & Wentzel, R. D. (1994). The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): A guide to its development and use. St. Louis: Washington University, Center of Psychobiology of Personality.Google Scholar
Coates, S. (1972). Preschool embedded figures test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Coffield, F. C., Moseley, D. V. M., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004a) Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: Findings of a systematic and critical review of learning styles models. London: Learning and Skills Research Center.Google Scholar
Coffield, F. C., Moseley, D. V. M., Hall, E., (2004b) Should we be using learning styles? What research has to say to practice. London: Learning and Skills Research Center.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. R., Stotland, E., & Wolfe, D. M. (1955). An experimental investigation of need for cognition. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51 (2), 291294.Google Scholar
Cohen, N. J., Weiss, G., & Minde, K. (1972). Cognitive styles in adolescents previously diagnosed as hyperactive. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 13, 203209.Google Scholar
Comenius, J. A. (1910). The great didactic: of John Amos Comenius. (Ed. by M. H. Keatinge).Google Scholar
Cools, E. (2012). Understanding styles in organizational behaviors: A summary of insights and implications In Zhang, L. F., Sternberg, R. J., and Rayner, S. (Eds.), Handbook of intellectual styles: Preferences in cognition, learning, and thinking (pp. 329351). New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Cooperative School and College Ability Tests, The (1955). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Cooperman, E. W. (1980). Field differentiation and intelligence. Journal of Psychology, 105 (1), 2933.Google Scholar
Coopersmith, S. (1981). Self-esteem inventories. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Coren, S., & Porac, C. (1988). Familial resemblance in cognitive abilities: An indirect method of measurement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 67, 935941.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Still stable after all these years: Personality as a key to some issues in adulthood and old age. In Baltes, P. B. & Brim, O. G. (Eds.), Life span development and behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 65102). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R., & Holland, J. L. (1984). Personality and vocational interests in an adult sample. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69 (3), 390400.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). The NEO Personality Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., (1989). NEO PI/FFI professional manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., (1992). The NEO Personality Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., (1995). The NEO Personality Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Crawford, P. L., & Bradshaw, H. L. (1968). Perception of characteristics of effective university teachers: A scaling analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28 (4), 10791085.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297334.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671684.Google Scholar
Cropley, A. J. (1965). Originality, personality and intelligence. Unpublished PhD diss., University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Cropley, A. J. (1997). Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles. In Runco, M. A. (Ed.), Creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 83114). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. S., & DeBell, M. (2002). Sources of civic orientation among American youth: Trust, religious valuation and attributions of responsibility. Political Psychology, 23, 113132.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Robinson, R. E. (1986). Culture, time, and development of talent. In Sternberg, R. J. and Davidson, J. E. (Eds.) Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 264284). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
CTBS/McGraw-Hill (1973). Comprehensive Tests of Basic Skills. Monterey, CA: Author.Google Scholar
Curry, L. (1983). An organization of learning styles theory and constructs. ERIC Document 235, 185.Google Scholar
Curry, L. (1987). Integrating concepts of cognitive or learning style: A review with attention to psychometric standards. Ottawa, ON: Canadian College of Health Service Executives.Google Scholar
Davidson, W. B. (1984). Personality correlates of the Matching Familiar Figures Test in adults. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 478482.Google Scholar
Davis, C. D., Kaufman, J. C., & McClure, F. H. (2011). Non-cognitive constructs and self-reported creativity by domain. Journal of Creative Behavior, 45 (3), 188202.Google Scholar
DeBell, M., & Crystal, D. S. (2005). On the association of field dependence-independence with personality, learning style, and social-political attitudes among adolescents. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 101(3), 819826.Google Scholar
De Corte, E. (2000). Marrying theory building and the improvement of school practice. Learning and Instruction, 10, 249266.Google Scholar
De Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (1997). The five-factor model of personality and Holland’s RIASEC interest types. Personality & Individual Differences, 23 (1), 87103.Google Scholar
Dellana, S. A. & McLeod, M. E. (1997). Relationships of instructors’ personalities with total quality management practice in the university classroom. Psychological Reports, 81 (1), 99118.Google Scholar
Dellas, M., & Gaier, E. L. (1970). Identification of creativity: The individual. Psychological Bulletin, 73 (1), 5573.Google Scholar
Deming, W. E. (1982). Out of crisis. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.Google Scholar
DeNovellis, R., & Lawrence, G. (1983). Correlations of teacher personality variables (Myers-Briggs) and classroom observation data. Research in Psychological Type, 6, 37–46.Google Scholar
De Ribaupierre, A. (1989). Cognitive style and operational development: A review of French literature and a neo-Piagetian reinterpretation. In Globerson, T. & Zelniker, T. (Eds.), Cognitive style and cognitive development (Human Development, Vol. 3, pp. 86115). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Derogatis, L. R., Rickels, K., & Rock, A. (1976). The SCL-90 and the MMPI: A step in the validation of a new self-report scale. British Journal of Psychiatry, 128, 280289.Google Scholar
DeTienne, D. R., & Chandler, G. N. (2004). Opportunity identification and its role in the entrepreneurial classroom: A pedagogical approach and empirical test. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3 (3), 242257.Google Scholar
DeVellis, R. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1929). The quest for certainty. New York: Minton, Balch.Google Scholar
Dikici, A. (2014). Relationships between thinking styles and behaviors fostering creativity: An exploratory study for the mediating role of certain demographic traits. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14 (1), 179201.Google Scholar
Diseth, A. (2002). The relationship between intelligence, approaches to learning and academic achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46 (2), 219230.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., Palaskonis, D. G., & Pearson, J. L. (2004). Creativity and intuition revisited. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38 (4), 244259.Google Scholar
Dollinger, S. J., Urban, K. K., & James, T. A. (2004). Creativity and openness: Further validation of two creativity measures. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 3547.Google Scholar
Domino, G. (1970). Identification of potentially creative persons from the Adjective Check List. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 35, 4851.Google Scholar
Donovan, D. M., Hague, W. H., & O’Leary, M. R. (1975). Perceptual differentiation and defense mechanisms in alcoholics. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31 (2), 356359.Google Scholar
Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410436.Google Scholar
Doyle, J. A. (1975). Field independence and self-actualization. Psychological Reports, 36, 363366.Google Scholar
Doyle, J. A. (1976). Field-dependent introverts and psychological health. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42, 196.Google Scholar
Dudley, G. E. (1978). Effects of sex, social desirability, and birth order on the Defense Mechanisms Inventory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46 (6), 14191422.Google Scholar
Duncker, K. (1935). Zur Psycholigie des produktiven Denkens. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S., & Elliott, E. S. (1983). Achievement motivation. In Mussen, P. H. (Ed.), Handbook of child development (Vol. 4, pp. 643691). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Eachus, P. (1993). Development of the Health Student Self-efficacy Scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 670.Google Scholar
Eisinga, R., Teelken, C., & Doorewaard, H. (2010). Assessing cross-national invariance of the three-component model of organizational commitment: A six-country study of European university faculty. Cross-Cultural Research, 44 (4), 341373.Google Scholar
Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., & Harman, H. H. (1976). Manual for the kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Elder, R. L. (1989). Relationships between adaption-innovation, experienced control, and state-trait anxiety. Psychological Reports, 65, 4754.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34 (3), 169189.Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100 (3), 613628.Google Scholar
Elovson, A. C., & Fleming, J. S. (1989). Rationale for multidimensional self-esteem scale scoring and weighting. Unpublished manuscript, California State University.Google Scholar
Emir, S. (2013). Contributions of teachers’ thinking styles to critical thinking dispositions (Istanbul-Fatih sample). Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13 (1), 337347.Google Scholar
Entwistle, N. (1981). Styles of teaching and learning: An integrated outline of educational psychology for students, teachers, and lecturers. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Entwistle, N. J. (1997). The Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST). Edinburgh: Center for Research on Learning and Instruction, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Hounsell, J. (2003). Investigating ways of enhancing university teaching-learning environments: Measuring students’ approaches to studying and perceptions of teaching. In E. de Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. Van Merriënboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions (pp. 89–107). Oxford: Pergamon/Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Epstein, M. H., Cullinan, D., & Sternberg, L. (1977). Impulsive cognitive tempo in severe and mild learning disabled children. Psychology in the Schools, 14 (3), 290294.Google Scholar
Epstein, M. H., Hallahan, D. P., & Kauffman, J. M. (1975). Implications of the reflectivity-impulsivity dimension for special education. Journal of Special Education, 9 (1), 1125.Google Scholar
Erez, M. (1980). Correlates of leadership style: Field-dependence and social intelligence versus social orientation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50, 231238.Google Scholar
Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: W. W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. Psychological Issues Monograph, Vol. I (1). New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Erwin, T. D. (1987). Erwin Identity Scale: Manual. Harrisonburg, VA: Developmental Analytics.Google Scholar
Erwin, T. D., & Delworth, U. (1980). An instrument to measure Chickering’s vector of identity. National Association of Student Personnel Administrators Journal, 17, 19–24.Google Scholar
Evans, C., & Waring, M. (2009). The place of cognitive style in pedagogy: Realizing potential in practice. In Zhang, L. F. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Perspectives on the nature of intellectual styles (pp. 169208). New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Evans, C., Harkins, M. J., & Young, J. D. (2008). Exploring teaching styles and cognitive styles: Evidence from school teachers in Canada. North American Journal of Psychology, 10 (3), 567582.Google Scholar
Evans, N. J. (1996). Theories of student development. In Komives, S. R. & Woodard, D. B. (Eds.), Student services: A handbook for the profession (3rd ed.) (pp. 164187). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Evans, N. J., Forney, D. S., & Guido-DiBrito, F. (1998). Student development in college: Theory, research, and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1959). The Maudsley Personality Inventory. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1961). Handbook of abnormal psychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1963). Eysenck Personality Inventory. San Diego: Educational & Industrial Testing Service.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., (1964). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., (1991). Eysenck Personality Scales. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Facione, P., Facione, N., & Giancarlo, C. (1998). California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory – Manual. Millbrae: The California Academic Press.Google Scholar
Facione, P., Facione, N., (2001). California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory – Manual. Millbrae: The California Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fan, J. Q., & Zhang, L. F. (2014a). The role of learning environments in thinking styles. Educational Psychology, 34 (2), 252268.Google Scholar
Fan, J. Q., (2014b). The role of perceived parenting styles in thinking styles. Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 204211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, W. Q. (2008). Thinking styles among university students in Shanghai: Comparing traditional and hypermedia instructional environments. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 68 (7A), 2808.Google Scholar
Fan, W. Q., & He, Y. F. (2012). Academic achievement and intellectual styles. In Zhang, L. F., Sternberg, R. J., and Rayner, S. (Eds.), Handbook of intellectual styles: Preferences in cognition, learning, and thinking (pp. 233249). New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Fan, J. Q., & Zhang, L. F. (2009). Thinking styles and achievement motivations. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 299303.Google Scholar
Faytinger, S. (1978). Internal-external control as a moderator of teaching style and students’ satisfaction. Psychological Reports, 43, 1070.Google Scholar
Feldhusen, J. F., & Goh, B. E. (1995). Assessing and accessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research, and development. Creativity Research Journal, 8 (3), 231247.Google Scholar
Feldman, K. A. (1989). Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as judged by teachers themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators, and external (neutral) observers. Research in Higher Education, 30, 137189.Google Scholar
Ferguson, E. (1999). A facet and factor analysis of typical intellectual engagement (TIE): Associations with locus of control and the five factor model of personality. Social Behavior and Personality, 27 (6), 545561.Google Scholar
Fiebert, M. (1967). Cognitive styles in the deaf. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 24 (1), 319329.Google Scholar
Fiedler, F. E. (1962). Leader attitudes, group climate, and group creativity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65 (5), 308318.Google Scholar
Fiedler, F. E. (1964). A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 149190). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fine, B. J. (1958). The relationship between certain scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory and susceptibility to prestige suggestion. Psychological Newsletter, 9, 200203.Google Scholar
Fine, B. J. (1972). Intrinsic motivation, intelligence, and personality as related to cognitive and motor performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 34, 319329.Google Scholar
Fine, B. J., & Kobrick, J. L. (1969). Note on headache, personality traits, and visual performance at altitude. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 29, 521522.Google Scholar
Fine, B. J., & Sweeney, D. R. (1968). Personality traits, situational factors, and catecholamine excretion. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 3, 1527.Google Scholar
Fiorina, L., Antonietti, A., Colombo, B., & Bartolomeo, A. (2007). Thinking style, browsing primes and hypermedia navigation. Computers & Education, 49 (3), 916941.Google Scholar
Fjell, A. M., & Walhovd, K. B. (2004). Thinking styles in relation to personality traits: An investigation of the Thinking Styles Inventory and NEO-PI-R. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 45 (4), 293300.Google Scholar
Flanders, N. A. (1965). Teacher influence, pupil attitudes, and achievement. Co-operative Research Monograph No. 12, Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature of development of metacognition. In Weinert, F. E. & Kluwe, R. H. (Ed.), Matacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 2129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fleishman, E. A. (1957). The leadership opinion questionnaire. In Stogdill, R. M. & Coons, A. E. (Eds.), Leader behavior, its description and measurement (pp. 120133). Columbus: Ohio State University Bureau of Business Research. Research monograph No. 88.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1984). What is enlightenment? In Rabinow, P. (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 3250). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foxall, G. R., & Hackett, P. M. W. (1992). Cognitive style and extent of computer use in organizations: Relevance of sufficiency of originality, efficiency and rule-conformity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, 491497.Google Scholar
Fraser, B. J. (1998). The birth of a new journal: Editor’s introduction. Learning Environments Research, 1, 1–5.Google Scholar
French, J. W., Ekstrom, R. B., & Price, L. A. (1963a). Hidden Figures Test. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
French, J. W., Ekstrom, R. B., (1963b). Kit of reference tests for cognitive factors. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Fu, M. C. (2016). Student university outcomes: Do personal attributes and environmental factors matter? PhD diss., The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Fuqua, R. W., Bartsch, T. W., & Phye, G. D. (1975). An investigation of the relationship between cognitive tempo and creativity in preschool-age children. Child Development, 46, 779782.Google Scholar
Furnham, A. F. (1996). The Big Five versus the Big Four: The relationship between the Myers-Briggs type indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI five factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 21 (2), 303307.Google Scholar
Furnham, A. F., & Moutafi, J. (2012). Personality, age, and fluid intelligence. Australian Journal of Psychology, 64 (3), 128137.Google Scholar
Furnham, A. F., Moutafi, J., & Crump, J. (2003). The relationship between the revised neo-personality inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Social Behavior and Personality, 31 (6), 577584.Google Scholar
Furnham, A. F., Moutafi, J., & Paltiel, L. (2005). Intelligence in relation to Jung’s personality types. Individual Differences Research, 3 (1), 213.Google Scholar
Furnham, A. F., Crump, J., Batey, M., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009). Personality and ability predictors of the “Consequences” test of divergent thinking in a large non-student sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 536540.Google Scholar
Furnham, A. F., Dissou, G., Sloan, P., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2007). Personality and intelligence in business people: A study of two personality and two intelligence measures. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22 (1), 99109.Google Scholar
Furnham, A. F., Swami, V., Arteche, A., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2008). Cognitive ability, learning approaches and personality correlates of general knowledge. Educational Psychology, 28 (4), 427437.Google Scholar
Gade, E., Fuqua, D. R., & Hurlburt, G. (1988). The relationship of Holland’s personality types to educational satisfaction with a Native-American high school population. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 35 (2), 183186.Google Scholar
Gadzella, B. M. (1999). Differences among cognitive-processing styles groups on personality traits. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 26 (3), 161166.Google Scholar
Gaile, G. L. (1980). The spread-backwash concept. Regional Studies, 14, 1525.Google Scholar
Gardner, W. L., & Martinko, M. J. (1996). Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator to study managers: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22, 4583.Google Scholar
Garner, W. R., Hake, H. W., & Eriksen, C. W. (1956). Operationism and the concept of perception. Psychological Review, 63, 149159.Google Scholar
Gaster, W., Tobacyk, J., & Dawson, L. (1984). Jungian type in retail store managers. Journal of Psychological Type, 7, 19–24.Google Scholar
Gebauer, G. F., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2007). Psychometric intelligence dissociates implicit and explicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33 (1), 3454.Google Scholar
Gelade, G. A. (2002). Creative style, personality, and artistic endeavor. Genetic, Social & General Psychology Monographs, 128 (3), 213.Google Scholar
Gentry, W. A., Mondore, S. P., & Cox, B. D. (2007). A study of managerial derailment characteristics and personality preferences. Journal of Management Development, 26 (9), 857873.Google Scholar
Gerard, , H. (1969). Factors contributing to adjustment and achievement. Progress report of a joint project of Riverside Unified School District and University of California, Riverside. May.Google Scholar
Getzels, J. W. & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Gjesme, T., & Nygard, R. (1970). Achievement Motivation Scale. University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publications.Google Scholar
Gledhill, R. F., & van Der Merwe, C. A. (1989). Gender as a factor in student learning: Preliminary findings. Medical Education, 23, 201204.Google Scholar
Glenn, D. (2010). Customized teaching fails a test. Chronicle of the Higher Education (January 8): A6A8.Google Scholar
Gleser, G. C., & Ihilevich, D. (1969). An objective instrument for measuring defense mechanisms. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 5160.Google Scholar
Globerson, T., & Zelniker, T., eds. (1989). Cognitive style and cognitive development. (Human Development, Vol. 3). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Gocłowska, M. A., & Crisp, R. J. (2013). On counter-stereotypes and creative cognition: When interventions for reducing prejudice can boost divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 72–79.Google Scholar
Goff, M., & Ackerman, P.L. (1992). Personality–intelligence relations: Assessment of typical intellectual engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 537553.Google Scholar
Golden, C. J. (1975). The measurement of creativity by the Stroop color and word test. Journal of Personality Assessment, 39, 502506.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, R. E. (1984). Personality characteristics associated with adaption-innovation. The Journal of Psychology, 117, 159165.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, R. E. (1985). The factorial composition of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 245250.Google Scholar
Goldstein, G., & Chotlos, J. W. (1965). Dependency and brain damage in alcoholics. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 21, 135150.Google Scholar
Gong, Y. X. (1983). Revision of Wechsler’s adult intelligence scale in China. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 3, 362370.Google Scholar
Goodenough, D. R., & Eagle, C. J. (1963). A modification of the embedded-figures test for use with young children. The Journal of Genetic Psychology: Research and Theory on Human Development, 103 (1), 6794.Google Scholar
Gordon, D. A. (1977). Children’s beliefs in internal-external control and self-esteem as related to academic achievement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 41, 383386.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, G. D., Jones, E. M., & Holland, J. L. (1993). Personality and vocational interests: The relation of Holland’s six interest dimensions to five robust dimensions of personality. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40 (4), 518524.Google Scholar
Gottschaldt, K. (1926): Über den Einfluss der Erfahrung auf die Wahrnehmung von Figuren. I. Psychologische Forschung, 8 (1), 261317.Google Scholar
Gough, H. G. (1964). Manual for the California Psychological Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Gough, H. G. (1969). California Psychological Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 13981405.Google Scholar
Gough, H. G., & Heilbrun, A. B., Jr. (1965). The Adjective Check List manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Grant, M. B., & Cambre, M. A. (1990). Research on teachers' characteristics in relation to a cognitive-learning based interactive videodisc system. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33 (1), 64.Google Scholar
Gregorc, A. F. (1979). Learning/teaching styles: Potent forces behind them. Educational Leadership, 36 (4), 234236.Google Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1993). Thinking Styles in Teaching Inventory. Unpublished test, Yale University.Google Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L., (1995). Thinking styles. In Saklofske, D. & Zeidner, M. (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 205229). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Grossarth-Maticek, R., Eysenck, H. J., Boyle, G. J., Heeb, J., Costa, S. D., & Diel, I. J. (2000). Interaction of psychosocial and physical risk factors in the causation of mammary cancer, and its prevention through psychological methods of treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 3350.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groves, M. (2005). Problem-based learning and learning approach: Is there a relationship? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 10 (4), 315326.Google Scholar
Gruenfeld, L. W., & Weissenberg, F. (1974). Relationship between supervisory cognitive style and social orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59 (3), 386388.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity research: Past, present and future. American Psychologist, 5, 444454.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P., & Merrifield, P. R. (1960). The structure of intellect model: Its uses and implications. Reports from the Psychological Laboratory, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, No. 24.Google Scholar
Gundlach, R. H., & Gesell, G. A. (1979). Extent of psychological differentiation and creativity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 48, 319333.Google Scholar
Hageman, P. T. (1990). An investigation of the relationship between cognitive styles, selected dimensions of organizational climate, and job satisfaction of registered professional staff nurses. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51 (7): 3323B.Google Scholar
Hagen, J. W. (1967). The effect of distraction on selective attention. Child Development, 38, 685694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hai, D. M. (1983). Comparisons of personality dimensions in managers: Is there management aptitude? Akron Business and Economic Review, 14 (1), 31–36.Google Scholar
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Harlow, NJ: Pearson Educational.Google Scholar
Hakstian, A. R., & Scratchley, L. S. (1995). The IDEA Battery: Innovative and divergent elaboration aptitudes. Vancouver, BC: HR Decisions Ltd.Google Scholar
Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman, J. M., & Ball, D. W. (1973). Selective attention and cognitive tempo of low achieving and high achieving sixth grade males. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 36, 579583.Google Scholar
Hansen, J. C., & Campbell, D. P. (1985). Manual for the SCII (4th ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, A., Tchanturia, K., Naumann, U., & Treasure, J. (2012). Social emotional functioning and cognitive styles in eating disorders. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51 (3), 261279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hassan, M. M., & Abed, A. S. (1999). Differences in spatial visualization as a function of scores on hemisphericity of mathematics teachers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 387390.Google Scholar
Hattie, J. (2014). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
Hautala, T. M. (2006). The relationship between personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Management Development, 25 (8), 777794.Google Scholar
Hawkins, C. A., Williams, M. S., & Hawkins, R. C., III. (1990). Psychological types of social service managers. Journal of Psychological Type, 19, 44–49.Google Scholar
Hawley, G. A. (1988). Measures of psychosocial development: Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
Hayes, J., & Allinson, C. W. (1994). Cognitive style and its relevance for management practice. British Journal of Management, 5, 5371.Google Scholar
He, Y. F. (2007). The roles of thinking styles in learning and achievement among Chinese university students. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 67 (8A), 2879.Google Scholar
Hedlund, J., Wilt, J. M., Nebel, K. R., Ashford, S. J., & Sternberg, R. J. (2006). Assessing practical intelligence in business school admissions: A supplement to the graduate management admissions test. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 101127.Google Scholar
Hellriegel, D., & Slocum Jr, J. W. (1980). Preferred organizational designs and problems solving styles: Interesting companions. Human Systems Management, 1 (2), 151–158.Google Scholar
Helson, R. (1965). Childhood interest clusters related to creativity in women. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29 (4), 352361.Google Scholar
Hemmendinger, L. (1953). Perceptual organization and development as reflected in the structure of Rorschach test responses. Journal of Projective Techniques, 17, 162170.Google Scholar
Henson, R. K. & Chambers, S. M. (2003). Personality type as a predictor of teaching efficacy and classroom control in emergency certification teachers. Education, 124 (2), 261268.Google Scholar
Herrmann, N. (1989). The creative brain (2nd ed.). Lake Lure, NC: Brain Books.Google Scholar
Hetland, H., & Sandal, G. M. (2003). Transformational leadership in Norway: Outcomes and personality correlates. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12 (2), 147171.Google Scholar
Hocevar, D. (1979). The development of the Creative Behavior Inventory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 170 350.Google Scholar
Hockings, C. (2009). Reaching the students that student‐centered learning cannot reach. British Educational Research Journal, 35 (1), 8398.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, G. P., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2003). Complex or unitary? A critique and empirical reassessment of the Allinson-Hayes Cognitive Style Index. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 243268.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, G. P., Sadler-Smith, E., Sinclair, M., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2009). More than meets the eye? Intuition and analysis revisited. Personality and Individual Differences, 47 (4), 342346.Google Scholar
Holland, J. L. (1965). Vocational preference inventory: Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Holland, J. L. (1966). The psychology of vocational choice. Waltham, MA: Blaisdell.Google Scholar
Holland, J. L. (1973). Making vocational choices: A theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Holland, J. L. (1975). Manual for the Vocational Preference Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.Google Scholar
Holland, J. L. (1977). The Vocational Preference Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Holland, J. L. (1978). Manual for the Vocational Preference Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.Google Scholar
Holland, J. L. (1979). The Self-Directed Search professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Holland, J. L. (1985a). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Holland, J. L. (1985b). Manual for Vocational Preference Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Holland, J. L. (1985c). The Self-Directed Search professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Holland, J. L. (1994). Self-Directed Search. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Holland, J. L., Fritzsche, B. A., & Powell, A. B. (1994). Self-Directed Search – Technical manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Holland, J. L., Johnston, J. A., & Asama, N. F. (1994). More evidence for the relationship between Holland’s personality types and personality variables. Journal of Career Assessment, 2, 331340.Google Scholar
Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1982). The manual of learning styles. Maidenhead, UK: Honey Press.Google Scholar
Honey, P., (1992). The manual of learning styles. Maidenhead, UK: Honey Press.Google Scholar
Hood, A. B., & Jackson, L. M. (1997). The Iowa Managing Emotions Inventory. In Hood, A. B. (Ed.), The Iowa student development inventories (2nd ed.) (pp. 2231). Iowa City, IA: HITECH Press.Google Scholar
Hood, A. B., & Zerwas, S. C. (1997). The Iowa Vocational Purpose Inventory. In Hood, A. B. (Ed.), The Iowa student development inventories (2nd ed.) (pp. 93108). Iowa City, IA: HITECH Press.Google Scholar
Hopkins, J., Perlman, T., Hechtman, L., & Weiss, G. (1979). Cognitive style in adults originally diagnosed as hyperactives. Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 20 (3), 209216.Google Scholar
Hoppock, R. (1935). Job satisfaction. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179185.Google Scholar
Horn, J. L. (1989). Cognitive diversity: A framework of learning. In Ackerman, P. L., Sternberg, R. J., & Glaser, R. (Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Advances in theory and research (pp. 61116). New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Horn, J. L., & Cattell, R. B. (1966). Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 253270.Google Scholar
Horn, J. L. (1967). Age differences in fluid and crystallized intelligence. Acta Psychologica, 26, 107129.Google Scholar
Hough, J. R., & Ogilvie, D. T. (2005). An empirical test of cognitive style and strategic decision outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 417448.Google Scholar
Houtz, J. C., LeBlanc, E., Butera, T., & Arons, M. F. (1994). Personality type, creativity, and classroom teaching style in student teachers. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 29 (2), 2126.Google Scholar
Hoy, F., & Hellriegel, D. (1982). The Kilmann and Herden model of organizational effectiveness criteria for small business managers. Academy of Management Journal, 25 (2), 308–322.Google Scholar
Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1993). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 356372.Google Scholar
Hu, A. G. (2011). China in 2020: A new type of superpower. New York: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
Ihilevich, D., & Gleser, G. C. (1971). Relationship of defense mechanisms to field-dependence/independence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77, 296302.Google Scholar
Ihilevich, D., (1986). Defense mechanisms: Their classification, correlates, and measurement with the Defense Mechanisms Inventory. Owosso, MI: DMI Associates.Google Scholar
Ihilevich, D., (1993). Defense mechanisms: Their classification, correlates, and measurement with the Defense Mechanisms Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Imai, M. (1986). Kaizen: The key to Japan’s competitive success. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.Google Scholar
Institute for Behavioral Research in Creativity (1978). Preliminary administration and research manual: Biographical Inventory – Form U. Salt Lake City, Utah: Institute for Behavioral Research in Creativity.Google Scholar
Isaksen, S. G., Babij, B. J., & Lauer, K. J. (2003). Cognitive styles in creative leadership practices: Exploring the relationship between level and style. Psychological Reports, 23, 983994.Google Scholar
Jablokow, K. W., & Kirton, M. J. (2009). Problem solving, creativity, and the level-style distinction. In Zhang, L. F. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Perspectives on the nature of intellectual styles (pp. 137168). New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. (1956). A short form of Witkin’s Embedded Figures Test. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53, 254255.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. (1974). Personality Research Form manual. New York: Research Psychologists’ Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. N. (1956). A short form of Witkin’s Embedded Figures Test. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53, 254255.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. N. (1976). Jackson personality inventory manual. Goshen, NY: Research Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. N., Messick, S., & Meyers, C. T. (1962). The role of memory and color in group and individual embedded-figures measures of field-independence. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. N., Messick, S., & Myers, C. (1964). Evaluation of group and individual forms of embedded figures measurements of field independence. Educational and Psychological Measurements, 24, 177192.Google Scholar
Jalil, P. A., & Boujettif, M. (2005). Some characteristics of Nobel laureates. Creativity Research Journal, 17 (2 & 3), 265272.Google Scholar
Joe, V. C. (1971). Review of the internal-external control construct as a personality variable. Psychological Reports, 28, 619640.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. A. (1992). Predicting promotion to management in the wholesale grocery industry using the Type Differentiation Indicator. Journal of Psychological Type, 23, 51–59.Google Scholar
Jones, A. E. (1997). Field dependence revisited: An evaluation of issues for education and psychology. Doctoral thesis, University of Lancaster, England.Google Scholar
Jones, L. (2007). The student-centered classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jung, C. (1923). Psychological types. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Jung, C. G. (1958). Psychology and religion: West and east. Collected works 11 (Trans. by R. R. C. Hull). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Juran, J. M. (1988). Juran on planning for quality. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.Google Scholar
Kagan, D. M., & Smith, K. E. (1988). Beliefs and behaviors of kindergarten teachers. Educational Research, 30 (1), 2635.Google Scholar
Kagan, D. M., & Grandgenett, D. J. (1987). Personality and interaction analysis. Research in Education, 37, 1324.Google Scholar
Kagan, J. (1965a). Individual differences in the resolution of response uncertainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 154160.Google Scholar
Kagan, J. (1965b). Matching Familiar Figures Test. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Kagan, J. (1966). Developmental studies in reflection and analysis. In Kidd, A. H. & Rivoire, J. L. (Ed.), Perceptual development in children (pp. 487522). New York: International University Press.Google Scholar
Kagan, J. (2012). Psychology’s ghosts: The crisis in the profession and the way back. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kagan, J., & Moss, H. A. (1963). Psychological significance of styles of conceptualization. In Wright, J. E. & Kagan, J. (Eds.), Basic cognitive processes in children. Monograph of the Society for Research in Child Development, 28 (2), 73112.Google Scholar
Kagan, J., Pearson, L., & Welch, L. (1966). Modifiability of an impulsive tempo. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 359365.Google Scholar
Kagan, J., Rosman, B. L., Day, D., Albert, J., & Philips, W. (1964). Information processing in the child: Significance of analytic and reflective attitudes. Psychological Monographs, 78 (1, Whole No. 578), 1–37.Google Scholar
Karp, S. A., & Konstadt, N. L. (1963). Manual for the Children’s Embedded Figures Test. Oxford: Cognitive Tests.Google Scholar
Karp, S. A., (1965). Alcoholism and psychological differentiation: Long-range effect of heavy drinking on field dependence. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders, 140, 412416.Google Scholar
Karp, S. A., (1971). Children’s Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Karp, S. A., Poster, D. C., & Goodman, A. (1963). Differentiation in alcoholic women. Journal of Personality, 31, 386393.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1993). Manual for the Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test (KAIT). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A. S., McLean, J. E., & Lincoln, A. (1996). The relationship of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) to IQ level and the fluid and crystallized IQ discrepancy on the Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test (KAIT). Assessment, 3, 225239.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2002). Dissecting the golden goose: Components of studying creative writers. Creativity Research Journal, 14 (1), 2740.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. M. (2009). How are intellectual styles related to creativity across multiple domains? In Zhang, L. F. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Perspectives on the nature of intellectual styles (pp. 87106). New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., Cole, J. C., & Baer, J. M. (2009). The construct of creativity: A structural model for self-reported creativity rating. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 119134.Google Scholar
Kaye, W. H., Bastiani, A. M., & Moss, H. (1995). Cognitive style of patients with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 18 (3), 287290.Google Scholar
Keller, J., & Ripoll, H. (2004). Stability of reflective-impulsive style in coincidence-anticipation motor tasks. Learning and Individual Differences, 14, 209218.Google Scholar
Keller, R. T., & Holland, W. E. (1978). Individual characteristics of innovativeness and communication in research and development organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63 (6), 759762.Google Scholar
Kelley, T. M., & Stack, S. A. (2000). Thought recognition, locus of control, and adolescent well-being. Adolescence, 139, 531550.Google Scholar
Kelly, K. E. (2004). A brief measure of creativity among college students. College Student Journal, 38, 594596.Google Scholar
Kelly, K. E., & Kneipp, L. B. (2009). You do what you are: The relationship between scale of creative attributes and behavior and vocational interests. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 36 (1), 7983.Google Scholar
Keogh, B. K., & Donlon, G. (1972). Field dependence, impulsivity, and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 5, 331336.Google Scholar
Kershner, J. R., & Ledger, G. (1985). Effect of sex, intelligence, and style of thinking on creativity: A comparison of gifted and average IQ children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 (4), 10331040.Google Scholar
Khatena, J., & Torrance, E. P. (1973). Thinking creatively with rounds and words: Norms-technical manual. Lexington, MA: Personnel Press.Google Scholar
Kirton, M. J. (1961). Management initiative. London: Acton Society Trust.Google Scholar
Kirton, M. J. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622629.Google Scholar
Kirton, M. J. (1978). Have adaptors and innovators equal levels of creativity? Psychological Reports, 42, 695698.Google Scholar
Kirton, M. J. (1982). Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory (KAI). St. Albans: Occupational Research Center, Hatfield Polytechnic.Google Scholar
Kirton, M. J. (1991). The Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory. Birkhamsted, UK: Occupational Research Center.Google Scholar
Kirton, M. J. (1999). Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory manual (3rd ed.). Berkhamsted, UK: Occupational Research Center.Google Scholar
Klinger, T. H. (2006). Learning approach, thinking style and critical inquiry: The online community. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 16 (1), 91113.Google Scholar
Kobasa, S. C. (1979). Stressful life events, personality and health: An inquiry into hardiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 111.Google Scholar
Kogan, N. (1973). Creativity and cognitive style: A life-span perspective. In Baltes, P. B. & Schaie, K. W. (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Personality and socialization (pp. 146160). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kogan, N. (1983). Stylistic variation in childhood and adolescence: Creativity, metaphor, and cognitive styles. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markman (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3: Cognitive development (4th ed., pp. 630–706). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kogan, N. (1989). A stylistic perspective on metaphor and aesthetic sensitivity in children. In Globerson, T. & Zelniker, T. (Eds.), Cognitive style and cognitive development. (Human Development, Vol. 3, pp. 192213). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Kolb, D. A. (1976). The learning style inventory: Technical manual. Boston, MA: McBer.Google Scholar
Koppelman, K. L. (1980). An ethnographic investigation of teacher behavior as a function of cognitive style. Dissertation Abstracts International, 40 (7-A), 37433744.Google Scholar
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1987). The leadership challenge. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kovacks, M. (1976). Children’s Depression Inventory: Third revision. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Kozhevnikov, M. (2007). Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: Toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. Psychological Bulletin, 133 (3), 464481.Google Scholar
Kratzmeier, H., & Horn, R. (1988). Standard Progressive Matrices – Manual. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
Kwang, N. A., & Rodrigues, D. (2002). A Big-Five personality profile of the adapter and innovator. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 36 (4), 254268.Google Scholar
Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., Struyven, K., & Cascallar, E. (2012). Looking at learning approaches from the angle of student profiles. Educational Psychology, 32 (4), 493513.Google Scholar
Larson, L. M., & Borgen, F. H. (2002). Convergence of vocational interests and personality: Examples in an adolescent gifted sample. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 91112.Google Scholar
Lau, H. (2014). Thinking styles, motivational orientations, and academic achievement in learning physics among Hong Kong secondary school students. Unpublished doctoral thesis, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Laufer, N. W., & Denhoff, E. (1957). Hyperkinetic behavior syndrome in children. Journal of Pediatrics, 50, 463474.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Leary, M. M., Reilly, M. D., & Brown, F. W. (2009). A study of personality preferences and emotional intelligence. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 30 (5), 421434.Google Scholar
Leventhal, G., & Sisco, H. (1996). Correlations among field dependence/independence, locus of control and self-monitoring. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83, 604606.Google Scholar
Lewis, C., & Lovatt, P. J. (2013). Breaking away from set patterns of thinking: Improvisation and divergent thinking, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 46–58.Google Scholar
Li, C. H., Chi, L. K., & Peng, H. N. (2007). Construct validity of passion scale. Physical Education Journal, 40, 7788 [In Chinese, with semantic translation].Google Scholar
Ling, W. Q., Fang, L. L., & Zhang, Z. C. (2002). Research on Chinese employees’ organizational commitment. Social Sciences in China, Autumn, 5967.Google Scholar
Lipperman-Kreda, S., & Glicksohn, J. (2010). Personality and cognitive-style profile of antisocial and prosocial adolescents: A brief report. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54 (5), 850856.Google Scholar
Liu, M., Huang, Y., Kinshuk, , & Wen, D. (2013). Fostering learners’ metacognitive skills of keyword reformulation in image seeking by location-based hierarchical navigation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61 (2), 233254.Google Scholar
Lokan, J. (1988). The Self-Directed Search: Professional manual Australian supplement. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Lombardo, M. M., & McCauley, C. D. (1994). BENCHMARKS: A manual and trainer’s guide. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.Google Scholar
Lombardo, M. M., McCauley, C. D., McDonald-Mann, D., & Leslie, J. B. (1999). BENCHMARKS: Developmental reference points. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.Google Scholar
Longeot, F. (1969). Psychologie différentielle et théorie opératoire de l’intelligence. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
Lonka, K., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (1996). Epistemologies, conceptions of learning, and study practices in medicine and psychology. Higher Education, 31, 524.Google Scholar
Loo, R. (1978). Personality dimensions and reversible perspective in embedded figures test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 10161018.Google Scholar
Loo, R., & Townsend, P. J. (1977). Components underlying the relationship between field dependence and extraversion. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45, 528530.Google Scholar
Lowman, R. L., Williams, R. E., & Leeman, G. E. (1985). The structure and relationship of college women’s primary abilities and vocational interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 27, 298315.Google Scholar
Lueder, D. C. (1986a). Psychological types and leadership styles of the 100 top executive educators in North America. Journal of Psychological Type, 12, 8–12.Google Scholar
Lueder, D. C. (1986b). The “rising stars” in educational administration: A corollary to psychological types and leadership styles. Journal of Psychological Type, 12, 13–15.Google Scholar
Luh, D. B., & Lu, C. C. (2012). From cognitive style to creativity achievement: The mediating role of passion. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6 (3), 282288.Google Scholar
Luiselli, J. K., Putnam, R. F., Handler, M. W., & Feinberg, A. B. (2005). Whole-school positive behavior support: Effects on student discipline problems and academic performance. Educational Psychology, 25 (2–3), 183198.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent–child interaction. In E. M. Hetherington, & P. H. Mussen (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Socialization, personality, and social development, Vol. 4. (pp. 1–101). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
MacDonald, D. A., Anderson, P. E., Tsagarakis, C. I., & Holland, C. J. (1994). Examination of the relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Reports, 74, 339344.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D. W. (1960). The highly effective individual. Teachers College Record, 61, 367378.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D. W. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 17, 484495.Google Scholar
Madore, K.P., Addis, D. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2015). Creativity and memory: Effects of an episodic-specificity induction on divergent thinking. Psychological Science, 26 (9), 1461–1468.Google Scholar
Magno, C. (2013) Assessing students’ critical thinking and approaches to learning. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 12 (2), 1932.Google Scholar
Mahlios, M. (1981). Instructional design and cognitive styles of teachers in elementary schools. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 52 (2), 335338.Google Scholar
Mahlios, M. (1989). The influence of cognitive style on the teaching practices of elementary teachers. Early Child Development and Care, 51, 89107.Google Scholar
Malone, O., Jr. (1988). Psychological type differences between minorities and majorities in an organizational setting. Journal of Psychological Type, 14, 15–24.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. (1993). The use of students’ evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal, 30 (1), 217251.Google Scholar
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning, I – Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 411.Google Scholar
Masi, R. J., & Cooke, R. A. (2000). Effects of transformational leadership on subordinate motivation, empowering norms, and organizational productivity. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 8, 1647.Google Scholar
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The Maslach Burnout Inventory. Research edition. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Massari, D. J., & Massari, J. A. (1973). Sex differences in the relationship of cognitive style and intellectual functioning in disadvantaged preschool children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 122, 175181.Google Scholar
Masten, W. G., Khatena, J., & Draper, B. T. (1988). Hemispheric learning style and stimulation of creativity in intellectually superior students. Educational and Psychological Research, 8 (2), 8392.Google Scholar
Matthews, G., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D. (2003). Emotional intelligence: Science and myth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Maxwell, A. E. (1960). Obtaining factor scores on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. Journal of Medical Science, 106, 10601062.Google Scholar
Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In Salovey, P. & Sluyter, D. (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications (pp. 331). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
McCaulley, M. H., & Moody, R. A. (2001). Multicultural applications of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. In Suzuki, L. A., Ponterotto, J. G., & Meller, P. J. (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural assessment: Clinical, psychological, and educational applications (pp. 279305). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
McClelland, D. C. (1958). Risk-taking in children with high and low need for achievement. In Atkinson, J. W. (Ed.), Motives in fantasy, action, and society (pp. 306321). Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
McKenna, F. P. (1983). Field dependence and personality: A re-examination. Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 5155.Google Scholar
McMorris, T., Sproule, J., & MacGillivary, W. W. (2002). Field dependence/independence, observational and decision-making skills of trainee physical education teachers. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 33 (2), 195204.Google Scholar
Medley, F., & Larochelle, D. R. (1995). Transformational leadership and job satisfaction. Nursing Management, 26, 6465.Google Scholar
Mednick, S. A., & Mednick, M. T. (1967). Examiner’s manual: Remote Associates Test. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Meek, V. L. (2013). Academic job satisfaction from an international comparative perspective: Factors associated with satisfaction across 12 countries. In Bentley, P. J., Coates, H., Dobson, I., Goedegebuure, L., and Meek, J. L. (Eds.), Job satisfaction around the academic world (pp. 239262). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mehta, P. (1969). The achievement motive in high school boys. New Delhi: National Council of Educational Research and Training.Google Scholar
Meneely, J., & Portillo, M. (2005). The adaptable mind in design: Relating personality, cognitive style, and creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 17 (2), 155166.Google Scholar
Meng, X. H., Mao, W., Sun, W., Zhang, X. T., Han, C. Y., Lu, C. F., et al. (2012). Event-related potentials in adolescents with different cognitive styles: Field dependence and field independence. Experimental Brain Research, 216, 231241.Google Scholar
Meric, H. J., & Capen, M. M. (2008). Cognitive style and sex: A study of stereotypical thinking. Psychological Reports, 102 (3), 739744.Google Scholar
Merrifield, P. R., & Guilford, J. P. (1969). Match Problems V. Beverly Hills, CA: Sheridan Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Messer, S. B. (1976). Reflectivity-impulsivity: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 83 (6), 10261052.Google Scholar
Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19, 59–74.Google Scholar
Messick, S. (1994). The matter of style: Manifestations of personality in cognition, learning, and teaching. Educational Psychologist, 29, 121–136.Google Scholar
Metcalf, J. S., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). Model-it: A design retrospective. In Jacobson, M. J. & Kozma, R. B. (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education (pp. 77115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–98.Google Scholar
Michalica, K., & Hunt, H. (2013). Creativity, schizotypicality, and mystical experience: An empirical study. Creativity Research Journal, 25 (3), 266279.Google Scholar
Miller, A. (1987). Cognitive styles: An integrated model. Educational Psychology, 7 (4), 251268.Google Scholar
Miller, A. L. (2007). Creativity and cognitive style: The relationship between field-dependence-independence, expected evaluation, and creative performance. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1 (4), 243246.Google Scholar
Mills, C. J. (2003). Characteristics of effective teachers of gifted students: Teacher background and personality styles of students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(4), 272281.Google Scholar
Mills, J., Robey, D., & Smith, L. (1985). Conflict-handling and personality dimensions of project-management personnel. Psychological Reports, 57, 1135–1143.Google Scholar
Minor, L. C., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Witcher, A. E. (2002). Pre-service teachers’ educational beliefs and their perceptions of characteristics of effective teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 96 (2), 116127.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1976). Planning on the left side and managing on the right. Harvard Business Review, July–August, 4958.Google Scholar
Mohammed, K. A., Othman, J., & D’Silva, J. L. (2012). The influence of leadership styles on organizational commitment: A study of public university lecturers in Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research, 4 (4), 5661.Google Scholar
Mønneslands, K. (1985). Intelligensprøver for Voksne [Intelligence Tests for Adults; in Norwegian]. Oslo: TANO.Google Scholar
Moos, R. (1973). Conceptualization of human environment. American Psychologist, 28, 652665.Google Scholar
Moran, J. D., III, Milgram, R. M., Sawyers, J. K., & Fu, V. R. (1983). Original thinking in preschool children. Child Development, 54, 921926.Google Scholar
Morgan, H. (1997). Cognitive styles and classroom learning. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Mosley, D. C., & Pietri, P. H. (1985). Type profiles and managerial styles of bankers. Journal of Psychological Type, 10, 41–45.Google Scholar
Moss, F. A., Hunt, T., Omwake, K. T., & Woodward, L. G. (1955). Social intelligence test. Washington, DC: Center for Psychological Service.Google Scholar
Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., & Crump, J. (2003). Demographic and personality predictors of intelligence: A study using the Neo personality inventory and the Myers-Briggs type indicator. European Journal of Personality, 17 (1), 7994.Google Scholar
Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., (2007). Is managerial level related to personality? British Journal of Management, 18, 272280.Google Scholar
Moyal, B. (1977). Self-esteem, locus of control, stimulus appraisal, and depressive symptoms in children. In Friedman, R. J., Miezitis, S., & Butler, L. (Eds.), The development and evaluation of school-based assessments and treatment approaches for depressed children: Phase I – 1976–1977. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
Mukhopadhyay, P., & Dash, B. B. (1999). Cognitive style: Its relationship to intelligence and locus of control in children. Social Science International, 15 (1), 8185.Google Scholar
Muñoz-Doyague, M. F., González-Álvarez, N., & Nieto, M. (2008). An examination of individual factors and employees’ creativity: The case of Spain. Creativity Research Journal, 20 (1), 2133.Google Scholar
Munro, Nicholas, Chilimanzi, Yvonne, & O’Neill, Viv. (2012). Character strengths and psychological type in university peer educators. South African Journal of Psychology, 42 (1), 1524.Google Scholar
Murphy, A., & Janeke, H. C. (2009). The relationship between thinking styles and emotional intelligence: An exploratory study. South African Journal of Psychology, 39 (3), 357375.Google Scholar
Murray, R. A. (2005). Interpersonal guilt and self-defeating behavior of foster youth. Dissertation Abstracts International (Section B): The Sciences and Engineering, 65 (10B), 5415.Google Scholar
Myers, B., McCaulley, M., Quenk, N., & Hammer, A. (1998). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.Google Scholar
Myers, I. B. (1962). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Myers, I. B., & Briggs, K. C. (1943). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator – Form E. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Myers, I. B., (1977). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (Form G). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Myers, I. B., (1993). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator – Form G. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Myers, I. B., & McCaulley, M. H. (1975). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Myers, I. B., (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Myers, I. B., (1988). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Myrdal, G. (1957). Economic theory and undeveloped regions. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
Neufeldt, V. (1988). Webster’s new world dictionary. New York: Simon Schuster.Google Scholar
Newcombe, N., Bandura, M., & Taylor, D. (1983). Sex differences in spatial ability and spatial activities. Sex Roles, 9, 377386.Google Scholar
Ng, P. (2015). The association of intellectual styles, personality traits, and learning environment with academic achievement and career satisfaction among adult learners. Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Niaz, M., & Núñez, G. S. (1991). The relationship of mobility-fixity to creativity, formal reasoning, and intelligence. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 25 (3), 205217.Google Scholar
Niaz, M., Núñez, G. S., & Pineda, I. R. (2000). Academic performance of high school students as a function of mental capacity, cognitive style, mobility-fixity dimension, and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34 (1), 1829.Google Scholar
Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91(3), 328346.Google Scholar
Nicolaou, A. A., & Philippou, G. N. (2007). Efficacy beliefs, problem posing, and mathematics achievement. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 29 (4), 4870.Google Scholar
Nicolaou, A. A., & Xistouri, X. (2011). Field dependence/independence cognitive style and problem posing: An investigation with sixth grade students. Educational Psychology, 31 (5), 611627.Google Scholar
Niu, W. H. (2007). Individual and environmental influences on Chinese student creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41 (3), 151175.Google Scholar
Noppe, L. D. (1985). The relationship of formal thought and cognitive styles to creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 19 (2), 8896.Google Scholar
Noppe, L. D. (1996). Progression in the service of the ego, cognitive styles, and creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 9 (4), 369383.Google Scholar
Noppe, L. D., & Gallagher, J. M. (1977). A cognitive style approach to creative thought. Journal of Personality Assessment, 41, 8590.Google Scholar
Nowicki, S., Jr., & Duke, M. (1974). A locus of control scale for adults: An alternative to the Rotter. Journal of Personality Assessment, 38, 136137.Google Scholar
Nowicki, S., Jr., & Strickland, B. R. (1973). A locus of control scale for children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 40, 148154.Google Scholar
Nutt, P. C. (1986a). Evaluating MIS design principles. MIS Quarterly, 10, 139–155.Google Scholar
Nutt, P. C. (1990). Strategic decisions made by top executives and middle managers with data and process dominant styles. Journal of Management Studies, 27 (2), 173–194.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. H. (1987). Reflection-impulsivity in total communication and oral deaf and hearing children: A developmental study. American Annals of the Deaf, 132 (3), 213217.Google Scholar
Ohnmacht, F. W., & McMorris, R. F. (1971). Creativity as a function of field independence and dogmatism. The Journal of Psychology, 79 (2), 165168.Google Scholar
Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Witkin, H. A. (1971). Embedded Figures Test, Children’s Embedded Figures Test: Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Oltman, P. R. (1968). The portable rod-and-frame apparatus. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 26, 503506.Google Scholar
Oreg, S. (2003). Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (4), 680693.Google Scholar
Osipow, S. H. (1998). Occupational Stress Inventory-Revised Edition (OSI-R): Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Ostroff, C. (1992). The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organizational level analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 963974.Google Scholar
Otis, A. S. (1954). The Otis Quick-Scoring Mental Ability Test. New York: World Book.Google Scholar
Overbay, A., Patterson, A. S., & Grable, L. (2009). On the outs: Learning styles, resistance to change, and teacher retention. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 9 (3), 356370.Google Scholar
Owen, C. (1962). An investigation of creative potential at the junior high level. Studies in Art Education, 3, 1622.Google Scholar
Paasche, A. (1957). Rettleiing for Bruk av A-Batteriets Prøver for Mekanisk-Teknisk Innsikt [Guidelines for the use of the A-Battery Tests for Mechanic-Technical Insights; in Norwegian]. Oslo: Arbeids-direktoratet.Google Scholar
Palut, B. (2008). The relationship between thinking styles and level of externality: A study of Turkish female preschool student teachers. Social Behavior and Personality, 36 (4), 519528.Google Scholar
Pande, C. G., & Kothari, S. (1969). Field dependence and the Raven’s Progressive Matrices. Psychologia, 12, 4951.Google Scholar
Parasnis, I., & Long, G. L. (1979). Relationships among spatial skills, communication skills, and field independence in deaf students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49 (3), 879887.Google Scholar
Park, N., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. P. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 23, 603–619.Google Scholar
Park, S. K., Park, K. H., & Choe, H. S. (2005). Relationship between thinking styles and scientific giftedness in Korea. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16 (2–3), 8797.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J. (1969). Cognitive development and cognitive style: A general psychological integration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, J., & Burtis, P. J. (1975). FIT: Figural Intersection Test, A group measure of M-Space. Unpublished manuscript, York University.Google Scholar
Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rowher, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9, 105–119.Google Scholar
Pask, G. (1976). Styles and strategies of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 128148.Google Scholar
Patrick, A., & Durndell, A. (2004). Lucid dreaming and personality: A replication. Dreaming, 14 (4), 234239.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D. L. (1998). Paulhus Deception Scales. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
Peglar, M., & Borgen, F. H. (1984). The defense mechanisms of coronary patients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40 (3), 669679.Google Scholar
Pengilly, J. W., & Dowd, T. (2000). Hardiness and social support as moderators of stress. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56 (6), 813820.Google Scholar
Peprnik, J. (2001). Jan Amos Comenius, 1592–1670. In Palmer, J. A. (Ed.), Fifty major thinkers on education: From Confucius to Dewey. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Perlman, M. D., & Kaufman, A. S. (1990). Relationships among defensive styles, cognitive styles, processing styles, and attentional styles of normal adolescents. Psychological Reports, 67, 563578.Google Scholar
Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Perry, W. G. (1981). Cognitive and ethical growth: The making of meaning. In Chickering, A. (Ed.), The modern American college (pp. 76116). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Perry, W. G. (1999). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Pervin, L. A. (1967). A twenty-college study of student X college interaction using TAPE (Transactional Analysis of Person and Environment): Rationale, reliability, and validity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 290–302.Google Scholar
Peterson, C. (2006). A primer in positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, A. C., & King, M. O. (1993). A comparison between scores on Kirton’s inventory for nursing students and a general student population. Psychological Reports, 73 (1), 339345.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1969). The mechanisms of perception. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1972). Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 15, 112.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1980). Concerning creativity: Three methods. In Bringuier, J. C. (Ed.), Conversations with Jean Piaget (pp. 126132) (Trans. by Basia Miller Gulati). Chicago: University of Chicago Press [Original work published in 1977].Google Scholar
Piers, E., & Harris, D. (1969). The Piers-Harris Children’s Self-Concept Scale. Nashville, TN: Counselor Recordings and Tests.Google Scholar
Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459470.Google Scholar
Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E., III (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, 68, 7393.Google Scholar
Posner, B. Z., & Kouzes, J. M. (1988). Development and validation of the Leadership Practices Inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 483496.Google Scholar
Preston, J. A. (2007). Student-centered versus teacher-centered mathematics instruction: A meta-analysis. Unpublished PhD thesis, Indiana University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1997). Relations between perceptions of the teaching environment and approaches to teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 2535.Google Scholar
Purcell, S. L., & Wilcox, Diane M. (2007). Defining and examining technology intelligence: Cultivating beginning teachers’ technology competencies. In Stern, B. S. (Ed.), Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 9 (1–2) (pp. 279291). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Quenk, N. L. (1966). Fantasy and personal outlook: A study of daydreaming as a function of optimism, pessimism, realism, and anxiety (PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley). Dissertation Abstracts International, 27, 970B.Google Scholar
Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ramsden, P., Prosser, M. Trigwell, K., & Martin, E. (2007). University teachers’ experiences of academic leadership and their approaches to teaching. Learning and Instruction, 17, 140155.Google Scholar
Raven, J. C. (1938). Standard progressive matrices. London: HK Lewis.Google Scholar
Raven, J. C. (1965). Guide to using the Colored Progressive Matrices. London: Lewis.Google Scholar
Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1986). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Raven, J. C. (1998). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales (Section 4): Advanced Progressive Matrices. Oxford: OPP Limited.Google Scholar
Rayner, S. (2007). A teaching elixir, learning chimera or just fool's gold? Do learning styles matter? British Journal of Support for Learning, 22, 24–31.Google Scholar
Readence, J. E., & Bean, T. W. (1978). Modification of impulsive cognitive style: A survey of the literature. Psychological Reports, 43, 327227.Google Scholar
Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855863.Google Scholar
Reid, J. (1999). The relationships among personality type, coping strategies, and burnout in elementary teachers. Journal of Psychological Type, 51, 2233.Google Scholar
Reid, W. A., Duvall, E., & Evans, P. (2005). Can we influence medical students’ approaches to learning? Medical Teacher, 27 (5), 401407.Google Scholar
Reis, S. (1987). We can’t change what we don’t recognize: Understanding the special needs of gifted females. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 8389.Google Scholar
Renninger, K. A., & Snyder, S. S. (1983). Effects of cognitive style on perceived satisfaction and performance among students and teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75 (5), 668676.Google Scholar
Renzulli, J. S., & Sullivan, E. E. (2009). Learning styles applied: Harnessing students’ instructional style preferences. In Zhang, L. F. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Perspectives on the nature of intellectual styles (pp. 209231). New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Resnick, L. (Ed.) (1976). The nature of intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Reuchlin, M. (1962). Les méthodes quantitatives en psychologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Reynierse, J. H. (1991). The psychological types of outplaced executives. Journal of Psychological Type, 22, 27–32.Google Scholar
Reynolds, C., Kaltsounis, B., & Torrance, P. (1979). A children’s form of your style of learning and thinking: Preliminary norms and technical data. Gifted Child Quarterly, 23, 757766.Google Scholar
Richardson, F. C., & Suinn, R. M. (1972). The mathematics anxiety rating scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19, 551554.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. A., & Turner, T. E. (2000). Field dependence revisited I: Intelligence. Educational Psychology, 20 (3), 255270.Google Scholar
Richert, A. J., & Kettering, R. (1978). Psychological defense as a moderator variable. Psychological Reports, 42, 291294.Google Scholar
Riding, R. J., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles – An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11 (3 & 4), 193215.Google Scholar
Rivera-Flores, G. W. (2015). Self-instructional cognitive training to reduce impulsive cognitive style in children with Attention Deficit with Hyperactivity Disorder. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 13 (1), 27–46.Google Scholar
Roach, B. (1986). Organizational decision-makers: Different types for different levels. Journal of Psychological Type, 12, 16–24.Google Scholar
Rogers, C. R. (1983). Freedom to learn for the 80’s. New York: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company, A Bell & Howell Company.Google Scholar
Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Unpublished test, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Rosey, F., Keller, J., & Golomer, E. (2010). Impulsive-reflective attitude, behavioral inhibition and motor skills: Are they linked? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34 (6), 511520.Google Scholar
Ross, C. F. J., Francis, L. J., & Craig, C. L. (2005). Dogmatism, religion, and psychological type. Pastoral Psychology, 53 (5), 483497.Google Scholar
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80 (1) (Whole No. 609), 1–28.Google Scholar
Rozencwajg, P., & Corroyer, D. (2005). Cognitive processes in the reflective-impulsive cognitive style. The Journal of Genetic Psychology: Research and Theory on Human Development, 166 (4), 451463.Google Scholar
Ruane, F. V. (1973). An investigation of the relationship of response modes in the perception of paintings to selected variables (PhD diss., Pennsylvania State University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 34, 5031A. University Microfilms No. 74–4285.Google Scholar
Rubovits, P. C., & Maehr, M. L. (1971). Pygmalion analyzed: Toward an explanation of the Rosenthal-Jacobson findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 197203.Google Scholar
Rushton, J. P., Chrisjohn, R. D., & Fekken, G. C. (1981). The altruistic personality and the self-report altruism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 2, 111.Google Scholar
Rushton, S., Knopp, T. Y., & Smith, R. L. (2006). Teacher of the year award recipients’ Myers-Briggs personality profiles: Identifying teacher effectiveness profiles toward improved student outcomes. Journal of Psychological Type, 66 (4), 2334.Google Scholar
Rushton, S., Morgan, J., & Richard, M. (2007). Teacher’s Myers-Briggs personality profiles: Identifying effective teacher personality traits. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23 (4), 432441.Google Scholar
Rutter, M. (1967). A children’s behavior questionnaire for completion by teachers: Preliminary findings. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 8, 111.Google Scholar
Rutter, M., Tizard, J., & Whitmore, K. (1970). Education, health, and behavior: Psychological and medical study of child development. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 6878.Google Scholar
Sadler-Smith, E. (2009). A duplex model of cognitive style. In Zhang, L. F. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Perspectives on the nature of intellectual styles (pp. 328). New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Sadler-Smith, E., Spicer, D. P., & Tsang, F. (2000). The Cognitive Style Index: Replication and extension. British Journal of Management, 1, 175181.Google Scholar
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 9, 158221.Google Scholar
Saracho, O. N. (1978). Relationship between cognitive style and teachers’ perceptions of young children’s academic competence. Journal of Experimental Education, 51 (4), 184189.Google Scholar
Saracho, O. N. (1983). Cultural differences in the cognitive style of Mexican American students. Journal of the Association for the Study of Perception, 18 (1), 3–10.Google Scholar
Saracho, O. N. (1991). Teacher expectations and cognitive style: Implications for students’ academic achievement. Early Child Development and Care, 77, 97–108.Google Scholar
Saracho, O. N., & Dayton, C. M. (1980). Relationship of teachers’ cognitive styles to pupils’ academic achievement gains. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72 (4), 544549.Google Scholar
Satterly, D. J. (1976). Cognitive styles, spatial ability, and school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68 (1), 3642.Google Scholar
Sayles-Folks, S. L., & Harrison, D. K. (1989). Reflection-impulsivity and work adjustment. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 33 (2), 110117.Google Scholar
Schinka, J. A., Dye, D. A., & Curtiss, G. (1997). Correspondence between five-factor and RIASEC models of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68 (2), 355368Google Scholar
Schleifer, M., Weiss, G., Cohen, N., Elman, M., Cvejic, H., & Kruger, E. (1975). Hyperactivity in preschoolers and the effect of methylphenidate. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 45, 3850.Google Scholar
Schmidt, C. P., & Sinor, J. (1986). An investigation of the relationships among music audiation, musical creativity, and cognitive style. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34 (3), 160172.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Charles P. (1989). Applied music teaching behavior as a function of selected personality variables. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37 (4), 258271.Google Scholar
Schmidt, K. H., & Metzler, P. (1992). Wortschatztest. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
School and College Ability Tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460475.Google Scholar
Schraw, G., Horn, C., Thorndike-Christ, T., & Bruning, R. (1995). Academic goal orientations and student classroom achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 359–368.Google Scholar
Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., & Dornheim, L. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 167177.Google Scholar
Schwartz, M., Friedman, R. J., Lindsay, P., & Narrol, H. (1982). The relationship between conceptual tempo and depression in children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50 (4), 488490.Google Scholar
Schweiger, D. M., & Jago, A. G. (1982). Problem-solving styles and participative decision making. Psychological Reports, 50, 1311–1316.Google Scholar
Scratchley, L. S., & Hakstian, A. R. (2001). The measurement and prediction of managerial creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13 (3 & 4), 367384.Google Scholar
Selby, E. C., Shaw, E. J., & Houtz, J. C. (2005). The creative personality. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 49 (4), 300357.Google Scholar
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 514.Google Scholar
Serafino, P. A. (1979). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive style and teacher behavior. Dissertation Abstracts International, 40 (1-A), 210.Google Scholar
Shevrin, H., Smokler, I. A., & Wolf, E. (1979). Field independence, lateralization, and defense style. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49, 195202.Google Scholar
Shewchuk, R. M., & O’Connor, S. J. (1995). Health care executives: Subjective well-being as a function of psychological type. Journal of Psychological Type, 32, 2329.Google Scholar
Shim, J. Y., & Kim, O. J. (2003). A study of the characteristics of the gifted in science based on implicit theory. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 17, 241255.Google Scholar
Shiomi, K., & Loo, R. (1999). Cross-cultural response styles on the Kirton Adaptation-Innovation Inventory. Social Behavior and Personality, 27 (4), 413420.Google Scholar
Shokri, O., Kadivar, P., Farzad, V., Sangari, A. A., & Ghana-ei, Z. (2006). The role of personality traits and thinking styles in academic achievement: Introducing casual models. Journal of Iranian Psychologists, 2 (7), 219–235.Google Scholar
Silver, E. A., & Cai, J. (1996). An analysis of arithmetic problem posing by middle school students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27 (5), 521539.Google Scholar
Sirgy, M. J., Grzeskowiak, S., & Rahtz, D. (2007). Quality of college life of students: Developing and validating a measure of well-being. Social Indicators Research, 80 (2), 343360.Google Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.Google Scholar
Skinner, N. F., & Drake, J. M. (2003). Behavioral implications of adaption-innovation: III. Adaption-innovation, achievement motivation and academic performance. Social Behavior and Personality, 31(1), 101106.Google Scholar
Skinner, N. F., & Fox-Francoeur, C. (2013). Personality implications of adaption-innovation: VI. Adaption-innovation as a predictor of disease proneness. Social Behavior and Personality, 41 (2), 223228.Google Scholar
Slavin, R. E. (2003). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Smith, B., Munday, R., & Windham, R. (1995). Prediction of teachers’ use of technology based on personality type. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 22 (3), 281285.Google Scholar
Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, C. L. (1975). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University.Google Scholar
Soar, R. (1971). Florida Climate and Control System: Manual. Gainesville, FL: Institute for Development of Human Resources, University of Florida.Google Scholar
Solberg, V. S., O’Brien, K., Villarreal, P., Kennell, R., & Davis, B. (1993). Self-efficacy and Hispanic college students: Validation of the College Self-Efficacy Instrument. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 15, 8095.Google Scholar
Soliman, A., Bellaj, T., & Khelifa, M. (2016). An integrative psychological model for radicalism: Evidence from structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 127133.Google Scholar
Sommer, L. (2013). The influence of experience and cognitive style on international entrepreneurial intentions: The contribution of academic education in this relation. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11 (2), 311344.Google Scholar
Song, R. H., & Song, A. Y. (1971). Development of a vocational adjustment rating scale for the retarded. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 18, 173176.Google Scholar
Sonuga-Barke, E., Houlberg, K., & Hall, M. (1994). When is “impulsiveness” not impulsive? The case of hyperactive children’s cognitive style. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 35 (7), 12471253.Google Scholar
Sowden, P. T., Clements, L., Redlich, C., & Lewis, C. (2015). Improvisation facilitates divergent thinking and creativity: Realizing a benefit of primary school arts education. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2 (9), 128–138.Google Scholar
Spaulding, R. L. (1967). Introduction to the use of Coping Analysis Schedule for Educational Settings (CASES). Education Improvement Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Sperry, R. W. (1973). Lateral specialization of cerebral function in the surgically separated hemispheres. In McGuigan, E. J. & Shoonover, R. A. (Eds.), The psychophysiology of thinking (pp. 209229). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C. D. (1983). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (for Adults). Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.Google Scholar
Spielberger, C. D, Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: STAI (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Spotts, J. V., & Mackler, B. (1967). Relationships of field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles to creative test performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 24, 239268.Google Scholar
Srivastava, S., Childers, M., Baek, J. H., Strong, C. M., Hill, S. J., Warsett, K. S., et al. (2010). Toward interaction of affective and cognitive contributors to creativity in bipolar disorders: A controlled study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 125, 2734.Google Scholar
Stanford Achievement Test (1954). Yonkers, NY: World Book Company.Google Scholar
Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. Journal of Psychology, 36, 311–322.Google Scholar
Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S. D., Darling, N., Mounts, N. S., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1994). Overtime changes in adjustment and competence among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development, 65 (3), 754–770.Google Scholar
Stern, G. (1971). Classroom environment index. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1988). Mental self-government: A theory of intellectual styles and their development. Human Development, 31, 197224.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1993). Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test (Level H). Unpublished test, Yale University. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18 (1), 8798.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2010). College admissions for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2015). Styles of thinking and learning: Personal mirror or personal mirage? The American Journal of Psychology, 128 (1), 115122.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K. (1991). Thinking Styles Inventory. Tallahassee, FL: Star Mountain Projects.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., (1992). Thinking Styles Inventory. Unpublished test, Yale University.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Wagner, R. K., & Zhang, L. F. (2003). Thinking Styles Inventory – Revised. Unpublished test, Yale University.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Wagner, R. K., (2007). Thinking Styles Inventory – Revised II. Unpublished test, Tufts University.Google Scholar
Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of the literature. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Strange, C. C. (1996). Dynamics of campus environments. In Komives, S. R. and Woodard, D. B. Jr. (Eds.), Student services: A handbook for the profession (3rd ed.) (pp. 244268). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Strong, E. K., Jr., Donnay, D. A. C., Morris, M. L., Schaubhut, N. A., & Thompson, R. C. (2004). Strong Interest Inventory, Revised Edition. Mountain View, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Sun, C., Wang, D., & Chang, Y. (2013). Effects of thinking style on design strategies: Using bridge construction simulation programs. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16 (1), 309320.Google Scholar
Sun, L. J. (2003). Satisfied with old customs and outdated information. In Lo, W. H. (Ed.), Best Chinese idioms (Volume III) (pp. 9697). Chai Wan, HK: Peach Book Co.Google Scholar
Sűnbűl, A. M. (2004). Duşunme Stilleri Olceğinin gecerlikve guvenirliği. Eğitim ve Bilim, 29, 25–42.Google Scholar
Sungur, S. (2007). Contribution of motivational beliefs and metacognition to students’ performance under consequential and nonconsequential test conditions. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13 (2), 127142.Google Scholar
Suphi, N., & Yaratan, H. (2012). Effects of learning approaches, locus of control, socio-economic status and self-efficacy on academic achievement: A Turkish perspective. Educational Studies, 38 (4), 425431.Google Scholar
Sutherland, E. H., Schroeder, H. G., & Tordella, C. L. (1950). Personality traits and alcoholic. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 11, 547561.Google Scholar
Sweeney, D. R., & Fine, B. J. (1965). Pain reactivity and field dependence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 21, 757758.Google Scholar
Tai, , R. (2012). The impact of teaching styles on students’ learning styles and career interests. Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Tait, H., & Entwistle, N. (1996). Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies. Higher Education, 31, 97116.Google Scholar
Tanova, C. (2003). Cognitive styles and learning preferences of undergraduate business students in north Cyprus. Psychological Reports, 93 (3), 11491155.Google Scholar
Tavris, C. (1992). The mismeasure of women. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Taylor, E. (1986). Childhood hyperactivity. British Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 562573.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. M. (1979). The effects of cognitive styles of professors and undergraduates on the students’ course evaluations. Dissertation Abstracts International, 40 (8-A), 4504.Google Scholar
Thurstone, L. L. (1944). A factorial study of perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tiedemann, J. (1989). Measures of cognitive styles: A critical review. Educational Psychology, 24, 261–275.Google Scholar
Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52 (3), 591620.Google Scholar
Tiffany, D. W., & Tiffany, P. G. (1985). Manual for the Tiffany Control Scales. Wakefield, RI: Applied Innovations.Google Scholar
Tokar, D. M., & Swanson, J. L. (1995). Evaluation of the correspondence between Holland’s vocational personality typology and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 46, 89108.Google Scholar
Tokar, D. M., Vaux, A., & Swanson, J. L. (1995). Dimensions relating Holland’s vocational personality typology and the five-factor model. Journal of Career Assessment, 3 (1), 5774.Google Scholar
Toner, B. B., Garfinkel, P. E., & Garner, D. M. (1987). Cognitive style of patients with bulimic and diet-restricting anorexia nervosa. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 144 (4), 510512.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Engle Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance tests of creative thinking. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative intellectual: Norms-technical manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1984). Human information processing survey, research edition. Athens, GA: HIP Systems.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1988). Style of learning and thinking: Administrator’s manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1990). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P., & Frasier, M. M. (1983). Style of learning and thinking and biographical inventory measures. The Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 8 (4), 206210.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P., & Reynolds, C. R. (1978). Images of the future of gifted adolescents: Effects of alienation and specialized cerebral functioning. Gifted Child Quarterly, 22(1), 4054.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P., (1980). Preliminary norms technical manual for Your Style of Learning and Thinking – Form C. Athens, GA: Department of Educational Psychology, The University of Georgia.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P., McCarthy, B., & Kolesinski, M. T. (1988). Style of Learning and Thinking. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P., Reynolds, C. R., Reigel, T., & Ball, O. E. (1977). Your Style of Learning and Thinking, Forms A and B: Preliminary forms, abbreviated technical notes, scoring keys, and selected references. Gifted Child Quarterly, 21, 563573.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P., Riegel, T., Reynolds, C. R., & Ball, O. (1976). Preliminary manual: Your Style of Learning and Thinking. Athens, GA: Department of Educational Psychology, University of Georgia.Google Scholar
Trigwell, K. (2002). Approaches to teaching design subjects: A quantitative analysis. Art, Design, and Communication in Higher Education, 1, 69–80.Google Scholar
Trigwell, K. (2009). Relations between teachers’ emotions in teaching and their approaches to teaching in higher education: A pilot study. Paper presented at 13th conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Trigwell, K. (2012). Relations between teachers’ emotions in teaching and their approaches in teaching in higher education. Instructional Science, 40, 607621.Google Scholar
Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996). Congruence between intention and strategy in science teachers’ approaches to teaching. Higher Education, 32, 7787.Google Scholar
Trigwell, K., (2004). Development and use of the approaches to teaching inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16 (4), 409424.Google Scholar
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Taylor, P. (1994). Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science. Higher Education, 27, 7584.Google Scholar
Troldahl, V., & Powell, F. (1965). A short form dogmatism scale for use in field studies. Social Forces, 44, 211214.Google Scholar
Turner, R. G., Willerman, L., & Horn, J. M. (1976). Personality correlates of WAIS performance. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 349–354.Google Scholar
Undheim, J. O. (1981). On intelligence II: A neo-Spearman model to replace Cattell’s theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22, 181187.Google Scholar
Upmanyu, V. V., Narula, V., & Moein, L. (1995). A study of suicide ideation: The intervening role of cognitive rigidity. Psychological Studies, 40 (3), 126131.Google Scholar
Urban, K. K., & Jellen, H. G. (1996). Test for Creative Thinking – Drawing Production (TCT-DP) manual. Frankfurt: Swets Test Services.Google Scholar
Vallerand, R. J., Blanchard, C., Mageau, G. A., Koestner, R., Ratelle, C., Léonard, M., … Marsolais, J. (2003). Les passions de l’Ăme: On obsessive and harmonious passion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 756767.Google Scholar
Van de Kamp, M. T., Admiraal, W., Van Drie, J., & Rijlaarsda, G. (2015). Enhancing divergent thinking in visual arts education: Effects of explicit instruction of metacognition. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 47–58.Google Scholar
Van den Broek, M. D., Bradshaw, C. M., & Szabadi, E. (1987). Performance of normal adults on the Matching Familiar Figures Test. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26, 7172.Google Scholar
Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., & Lens, W. (2009). Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101 (3), 671688.Google Scholar
Vaughan, J. A., & Knapp, R. H. (1963). A study in pessimism. Journal of Social Psychology, 59, 7792.Google Scholar
Vermunt, J. D. (1992). Learning styles and regulation of learning in higher education – Toward process-oriented instruction in autonomous thinking. Amsterdam/Lisse: Swets & Zeilinger.Google Scholar
Vermunt, J. D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149171.Google Scholar
von Stumm, S., & Furnham, A. F. (2012). Learning approaches: Associations with typical intellectual engagement, intelligence and the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 53 (5), 720723.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wall, J. H. (1936). A study of alcoholism in men. American Journal of Psychiatry, 92, 13901401.Google Scholar
Wall, J. H. (1937). A study of alcoholism in women. American Journal of Psychiatry, 93, 943955.Google Scholar
Walla, L. A. (1988). Relationship of teaching styles and learning styles to classroom environment. Theses, Dissertations, & Student Scholarship: Agricultural Leadership, Education & Communication Department. University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Paper 70.Google Scholar
Wallach, M. A. (1970). Creativity. In Mussen, P. H. (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (Vol. 1, 3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Wang, H., Wang, Y., Kong, J., Cui, L., & Tian, S. (2001). Enhancement of conflict processing activity in human brain under task relevant condition. Neurosci Lett, 298 (3), 155158.Google Scholar
Watkins, D. A., & Dahlin, B. (1997). Assessing study approaches in Sweden. Psychological Reports, 81, 131136.Google Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (6), 10631070.Google Scholar
Watson, G., & Glaser, E. M. (1980). Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Watson, L. W. & Hillison, J. (1991). Temperament type and job satisfaction among selected West Virginia agricultural education teacher. Journal of Agricultural Education, 32 (4), 2530.Google Scholar
Webster, P. R. (1972). The Teacher Structure Checklist: A possible tool for communication. Young Children, 27, 149153.Google Scholar
Webster, P. R. (1987) Refinement of a measure of creative thinking in music. In Madsen, C. K. & Prickett, C. (Eds.), Research in music behavior: Applications and extension (pp. 257271). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1949). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1955). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Wegner, R. C. (1979). The relationship of field independence-dependence cognitive styles with managerial disposition. Unpublished PhD diss., Northern Illinois University.Google Scholar
Weijers, H., Wiesbeck, G. A., & Böning, J. (2001). Reflection–impulsivity, personality and performance: A psychometric and validity study of the matching familiar figures test in detoxified alcoholics. Personality and Individual Differences, 31 (5), 731754.Google Scholar
Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., England, G. W., & Lofquist, L. H. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Unpublished test, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Weiss, G., Minde, K., Werry, J., Douglas, V. I., & Nemeth, E. (1971a). The hyperactive child – VIII. Five-year follow-up. Archive General Psychiatry, 24, 409414.Google Scholar
Weiss, G., Minde, K., Werry, J., Douglas, V. I., (1971b). Comparison of the effects of chlorpromazine, dextroamphetamine, and methlphenidate on the behavior and intellectual functioning of hyperactive children. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 104, 2025.Google Scholar
Weiss, G., Werry, J., Minde, K., Douglas, V., & Skyes, D. (1968). Studies on the hyperactive child – V. The effects of dextroamphetamine and chlorpromazine on behavior and intellectual functioning. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 9, 145156.Google Scholar
Weissenberg, P., & Gruenfeld, L. W. (1966). Relationships among leadership dimensions and cognitive style. Journal of Applied Psychology, 50 (5), 392395.Google Scholar
Werner, H. (1957). The concept of development from a comparative and organismic point of view. In Harris, D. B. (Ed.), The concept of development: An issue in the study of human behavior (pp. 125148). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Werry, J., Weiss, G., Douglas, V., & Martin, J. (1966). Studies on the hyperactive child – III. The effects of chlorpromazine on behavior and learning ability. Journal of American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 5, 292312.Google Scholar
Wertheimer, M. (1945). Productive thinking. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Widdgins, J. D. (1976). The relation of job satisfaction to Vocational Preferences among teachers of the educable mentally retarded. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 8 (1), 1318.Google Scholar
Wiggins, J. D., Lederer, D. A., Salkowe, A., & Rys, G. (1983). Job satisfaction related to tested congruence and differentiation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 8 (1) 1318.Google Scholar
Witkin, H. A. (1948). The effect of training of structural aids on performance in three tests of space orientation. CAA Div. Research Report, No. 80.Google Scholar
Witkin, H. A. (1950). Individual differences in ease of perception of embedded figures. Journal of Personality, 19, 115.Google Scholar
Witkin, H. A. (1954). Personality through perception: An experimental and clinical study. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Witkin, H. A. (1962). Psychological differentiation; studies of development. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Witkin, H. A. (1965). Psychological differentiation and forms of pathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 70 (5), 317336.Google Scholar
Witkin, H. A. (1971). A manual for the Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins: Field dependence and field independence. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Witkin, H. A., Karp, S. A., & Goodenough, S. A. (1959). Dependence in alcoholics. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcoholism, 20, 493504.Google Scholar
Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). Embedded Figures Test, Children’s Embedded Figures Test: Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, F., & Karp, S. A. (2002). Group Embedded Figures Test manual. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.Google Scholar
Witkin, H. A., Dyk, R. B., Faterson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R., & Karp, S. A. (1962). Psychological differentiation: Studies of development. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Witkin, H. A., Lewis, H. B., Hertzman, M., Machover, K., Meissner, P. B., & Wapner, S. (1954). Personality through perception: An experimental and clinical study. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Woerner, M., & Levine, T. (1950). A preliminary study of the relation between perception and thinking in children. Unpublished study.Google Scholar
Wonderlic, E. (1992). Wonderlic personnel test. Libertyville, IL: Wonderlic.Google Scholar
Wonderlic Personnel Test (1992). Wonderlic Personnel Test and Scholastic Level Exam: User’s manual. Libertyville, IL: Author.Google Scholar
Wright, J. C. (1971). The Kansas Reflection-Impulsivity Scale for Preschools. St. Louis, MO: CEMREL.Google Scholar
Wu, J. J. (1998). The study on new version of creativity test. Six-year project report of guidance by Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Wubbels, T., Créton, H. A., & Hooymayers, H. P. (1985). Discipline problems of beginning teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of The American Educational Research Association, Chicago, April. ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 260040.Google Scholar
Xie, Q. Z. (2013). Intellectual styles: Their malleability, their associations, and their relationships to ability and personality traits. Unpublished PhD diss., The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Xie, Q. Z., Gao, X. P., & King, R. B. (2013). Thinking styles in implicit and explicit learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 267271.Google Scholar
Yang, S. C., & Lin, W. C. (2004). The relationship among creative, critical thinking and thinking styles in Taiwan high school students. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31 (1), 3345.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, M., Gürçay, D. & Ekici, G. (2007). Adaptation of the academic self-efficacy scale to Turkish. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 33, 253259.Google Scholar
Yu, D. M. (2012). The roles of teachers’ teaching behavior in students’ learning styles and academic achievement. Unpublished PhD diss., The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Yu, T. M., & Zhu, C. (2011). Relationship between teachers’ preferred teacher-student interpersonal behavior and intellectual styles. Educational Psychology, 31 (3), 301317.Google Scholar
Zakaria, F. (2014). Innovation. Global Public Square: Cable News Network (U.S.A.) November 30.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (1996). Self-Rated Ability Scale. Unpublished test, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (1997). The Zhang Cognitive Development Inventory. Unpublished test. The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (1999). Short-Version Self-Directed Search. Unpublished test, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2001a). Approaches and thinking styles in teaching. Journal of Psychology, 135 (5), 547561.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2001b). Thinking styles and personality types revisited. Personality and Individual Differences, 31 (6), 883894.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2001c). Thinking styles, self-esteem, and extracurricular experiences. International Journal of Psychology, 36 (2), 100107.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2002a). Measuring thinking styles in addition to measuring personality traits? Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 445458.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2002b). The role of thinking styles in psychosocial development. Journal of College Student Development, 43 (5), 696711.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2002c). Thinking styles and the Big Five personality traits. Educational Psychology, 22 (1), 1731.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2002d). Thinking styles and cognitive development. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163 (2), 179195.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2002e). Thinking styles and modes of thinking: Implications for education and research. The Journal of Psychology, 136 (3), 245261.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2002f). Thinking styles: Their relationships with modes of thinking and academic performance. Educational Psychology, 22 (3), 331348.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2003a). Contributions of thinking styles to critical thinking dispositions. The Journal of Psychology, 137 (6), 517544.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2003b). Does the Big Five predict learning approaches? Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 14311446.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2003c). The Preferred Approach Inventory. Unpublished test, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2003d). The Preferred Thinking Styles in Teaching Inventory. Unpublished test, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2004a). Contributions of thinking styles to vocational purpose beyond self-rated abilities. Psychological Reports, 94, 697714.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2004b). Predicting cognitive development, intellectual styles, and personality traits from self-rated abilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 6788.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2004c). Thinking styles: University students’ preferred teaching styles and their conceptions of effective teachers. The Journal of Psychology, 138 (3), 233252.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2004d). Do university students’ thinking styles matter in their preferred teaching approaches? Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 15511564.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2005). Validating the theory of mental self-government in a non-academic setting. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 19151925.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2006). Thinking styles and the Big Five personality traits revisited. Personality and Individual Differences, 40 (6), 11771187.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2007a). Do personality traits make a difference in teaching styles among Chinese high school teachers? Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 669679.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2007b). Revisiting thinking styles’ contributions to the knowledge and use of and attitudes towards computing and information technology. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 1724.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2007c). Teaching styles and occupational stress among Chinese university faculty members. Educational Psychology, 27 (6), 823841.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2007d). From career personality types to preferences for teachers’ teaching styles: A new perspective on style match. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1863–1874.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2007e). Preferred Thinking Styles in Learning Inventory. Unpublished test, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2008a). Revisiting the Big Six and the Big Five among Hong Kong university students. Educational Psychology, 28 (1), 114.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2008b). Thinking styles and emotions. The Journal of Psychology, 142 (5), 497515.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2008c). Thinking styles and identity development among Chinese university students. The American Journal of Psychology, 121 (2), 255271.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2008d). Preferences for teaching styles matter in academic achievement: Scientific and practical implications. Educational Psychology, 28 (6), 615–625.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2009a). Anxiety and thinking styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 347351.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2009b). Occupational stress and teaching approaches among Chinese academics. Educational Psychology, 29 (2), 203219.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2010a). Do age and gender make a difference in the relationship between intellectual styles and abilities? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25 (87103).Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2010b). Do thinking styles contribute to metacognition beyond self-rated abilities? Educational Psychology, 30 (4), 481494.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2010c). Further investigating thinking styles and psychosocial development in the Chinese higher education context. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 593603.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2013). The malleability of intellectual styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2015a). Defense mechanisms and thinking styles. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 14 (2), 163179.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2015b). Preferred Leadership Styles Inventory. Unpublished test, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2016a). Preferred leadership styles in the workforce: A pilot study (manuscript in preparation).Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F. (2016b). Revisiting the preferred leadership styles in the workforce in Shenzhen (manuscript in preparation).Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F., & Chen, G. H. (2016). Preferred leadership styles among junior and senior managers in Guangzhou (manuscript in preparation).Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F., & He, Y. F. (2003). Do thinking styles matter in the use of and attitudes toward computing and information technology among Hong Kong university students? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29 (4), 471493.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F., (2011). Thinking styles and the Eriksonian stages. Journal of Adult Development, 18, 817.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F., & Higgins, P. (2008). The predictive power of socialization variables for thinking styles among adults in the workplace. Learning and Individual Differences, 18 (1), 1118.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F., & Huang, J. F. (2001). Thinking styles and the five-factor model of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15, 465476.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F., & Jing, L. Z. (2014). Organizational commitment and teaching styles among academics in mainland China. Educational Psychology, September, 116. DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2014.95546.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F., & Postiglione, G. A. (2001). Thinking styles, self-esteem, and socio-economic status. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 13331346.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F., & Shin, J. C. (2015). The research-teaching nexus among academics from 15 institutions in Beijing, Mainland China. Higher Education, 70 (3), 375394.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Thinking styles and teachers’ characteristics. International Journal of Psychology, 37 (1), 312.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F., (2005). A threefold model of intellectual styles. Educational Psychology Review, 17 (1), 153.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F., (2006). The nature of intellectual styles. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F., (Eds.) (2009a). Perspectives on the nature of intellectual styles. New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F., (2009b). Revisiting the value issue in intellectual styles. In Zhang, L. F. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Perspectives on the nature of intellectual styles (pp. 6385). New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F., & Wong, Y. H. (2011). Hardiness and thinking styles: Implications for higher education. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 10 (3), 294307.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F., Evans, C., & Postiglione, G. A. (2016). Do organizational commitments matter in teaching approaches among academics in projects 985 and 211 institutions in Beijing? Educational Psychology, 1–14. Retrieved from <www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01443410.2016.1262006>..>Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F., Fu, H., & Jiao, B. (2008). Accounting for Tibetan university students’ and teachers’ intellectual styles. Educational Review, 60 (1), 21–37.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. F., Sternberg, R. J., & Fan, J. Q. (2013). Revisiting the concept of “style match.” British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83 (2): 225237.Google Scholar
Zigler, E. (1963). A measure in search of a theory. Contemporary Psychology, 8, 133–135.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, M., Eysenck, S. B. G., & Eysenck, H. J. (1978). Sensation seeking in England and America: Cross-cultural age and sex comparison. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 477482.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Li-fang Zhang, The University of Hong Kong
  • Book: The Value of Intellectual Styles
  • Online publication: 03 November 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316014561.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Li-fang Zhang, The University of Hong Kong
  • Book: The Value of Intellectual Styles
  • Online publication: 03 November 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316014561.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Li-fang Zhang, The University of Hong Kong
  • Book: The Value of Intellectual Styles
  • Online publication: 03 November 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316014561.013
Available formats
×