Book contents
- The Theory of the Sublime from Longinus to Kant
- The Theory of the Sublime from Longinus to Kant
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Key to abbreviations and translations
- Introduction
- Part I Longinus’s theory of sublimity
- Part II Sublimity and modernity
- Part III The sublimity of the mind: Kant
- Conclusion
- Bibliography of works cited
- Index
- References
Bibliography of works cited
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2015
Book contents
- The Theory of the Sublime from Longinus to Kant
- The Theory of the Sublime from Longinus to Kant
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Key to abbreviations and translations
- Introduction
- Part I Longinus’s theory of sublimity
- Part II Sublimity and modernity
- Part III The sublimity of the mind: Kant
- Conclusion
- Bibliography of works cited
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Theory of the Sublime from Longinus to Kant , pp. 290 - 304Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Bibliography of works cited
Abaci, Uygar. “Kant’s Justified Dismissal of Artistic Sublimity.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66, no. 3 (2008): 237–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, M. H. The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Addison, Joseph. Critical Essays from the Spectator. Ed. Bond, Donald. New York: Oxford University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Addison, Joseph. Remarks on Several Parts of Italy: In the Years 1701, 1702, 1703. London: J. and R. Tonson and S. Draper, 1753.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry E. Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Ankersmit, F. R. Sublime Historical Experience. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashfield, Andrew, and de Bolla, Peter, Eds. The Sublime: A Reader in British Eighteenth-Century Aesthetic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, . The Metaphysics. Trans. McMahon, John H.. New York: Prometheus Books, 1991.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . On Rhetoric. Trans., notes, and appendices, Kennedy, George A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Poetics. Trans. Halliwell, Stephen. In: Aristotle Poetics, Longinus On the Sublime, Demetrius On Style (Loeb Classical Library). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. Literary Language and Its Public in Late Latin Antiquity and in the Middle Ages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, 1993.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Trans. Trask, Willard R.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Axelsson, Karl. The Sublime: Precursors and British Eighteenth-Century Conception. New York: Peter Lang, 2007.Google Scholar
Baillie, John. An Essay on the Sublime. London: 1747. http://www.earthworks.org/sublime/Baillie/index.html.Google Scholar
Bäumler, Alfred. Das Irrationalitätsproblem in der Ästhetik und Logik des 18. Jahrhunderts bis zur Kritik der Urteilskraft. Halle an der Saale: 1923.Google Scholar
Bäumler, Alfred. Le problème de l’irrationalité dans l’esthétique et la logique du XVIIIe siècle. Trans. Cossé, Olivier. Strasbourg: Presses Universitaire de Strasbourg, 1999.Google Scholar
Barnouw, Jeffrey. “The Morality of the Sublime: Kant and Schiller.” Studies in Romanticism 19 (1980): 497–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnouw, Jeffrey. “The Morality of the Sublime: To John Dennis.” Comparative Literature 35, no. 1 (1983): 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beardsley, Monroe C. Aesthetics from Classical Greece to the Present: A Short History. New York: Macmillan, 1966.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White. A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White. Early German Philosophy: Kant and His Predecessors. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Bell, David. The First Total War: Napoleon’s Europe and the Birth of Warfare as We Know It. New York: Mariner Books, 2007.Google Scholar
Bessière, Jean. La littérature et sa rhétorique: La banalité dans le littéraire au XXe siècle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1999.Google Scholar
Bessière, Jean. “Le Sublime aujourd’hui: d’un discours sur le pouvoir de l’art et de la littérature, et de sa possible réécriture.” In: La littérature et le sublime. Ed. Marot, Patrick. Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail, 2007: 419–58.Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold. The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold. “Poetry, Revisionism, Repression.” In: Critical Theory Since 1965. Ed. Adams, Hazard and Searle, Leroy. Tallahassee: University of Florida Press, 1986: 331–44.Google Scholar
Bohrer, Karl Heinz. Suddenness: On the Moment of Aesthetic Appearance. Trans. Crowley, Ruth. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Bohrer, Karl Heinz. “Instants of Diminishing Representation: The Problem of Temporal Modalities.” In: The Moment: Time and Rupture in Modern Thought. Ed. Freise, Heidrun. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2001: 113–34.Google Scholar
Boileau, Nicolas (Despréaux). Oeuvres complètes. Ed. Escal., Françoise de la Pléiade, Bibliothèque. Paris: Gallimard, 1966.Google Scholar
Boileau, Nicolas. “Preface.” Longinus, . Traité du sublime. Trans. Boileau, . Ed. and intro. Goyet, Francis. Paris: Le Livre de Poche, 1995.Google Scholar
Bouhours, Dominique. Les Entretiens d’Ariste et d’Eugène (1671). Ed. Beugnot, Bernard and Declercq, Gilles. Paris: Champion, 2003.Google Scholar
Bouhours, Dominique. La Manière de bien penser dans les ouvrages d’esprit. Paris: Sébastien Mabre-Cramoisy, 1687.Google Scholar
Brady, Emily. The Sublime in Modern Philosophy: Aesthetics, Ethics, and Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Budick, Sanford. Kant and Milton. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullard, Paddy. Edmund Burke and the Art of Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullard, Paddy. “Burke’s Aesthetic Psychology.” In: The Cambridge Companion to Edmund Burke. Eds. Dwan, David and Insole, Christopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012: 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullough, Edward. “‘Psychical Distance’ as a Factor in Art and as an Aesthetic Principle.” British Journal of Psychology 5 (1912): 87–117.Google Scholar
Bundy, Murray Wright. The Theory of the Imagination in Classical and Medieval Thought. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1927.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful (1757/1759). Ed. Phillips, Adam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful (1757/1759). Ed., intro. and notes, Boulton, J. T.. New York: Routledge, 1958/2008.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. “An Appeal from the New to the Old Whigs”(1791). In: Burke, Edmund, Selected Writings and Speeches. Ed. and intro. Stanlis, Peter J.. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, 1963: 623–57.Google Scholar
Burnet, Thomas. The Sacred Theory of the Earth (1681/1684). Ed. Willey, Basil. London: Centaur Press Limited, 1965.Google Scholar
Cherchi, Paolo. “Marino and the Meraviglia.” In: Culture and Authority in the Baroque. Ed. Ciavolella, Massimo and Coleman, Patrick. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2005: 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clery, Emma J. “The Pleasure of Terror: Paradox in Edmund Burke’s Theory of the Sublime.” In: Pleasure in the Eighteenth Century. Eds. Porter, Roy and Roberts, Marie. New York: New York University Press, 1996: 164–81.Google Scholar
Clewis, Robert R. The Kantian Sublime and the Revelation of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, Gustavo. “Longinus’ Treatment of the Sublime in the Age of Arcadia.” Nouvelles de la République des Lettres 1 (1981): 65–86.Google Scholar
Costelloe, Timothy M., Ed. The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtine, Jean-François, Deguy, Michel, Escoubas, Eliane, Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe, Lyotard, Jean-François, Marin, Louis, Nancy, Jean-Luc, and Rogozinski, Jacob. Du Sublime. Paris: Belin, 1988.Google Scholar
Courtine, Jean-François, Deguy, Michel, Escoubas, Eliane, Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe, Lyotard, Jean-François, Marin, Louis, Nancy, Jean-Luc, and Rogozinski, Jacob. Of the Sublime: Presence in Question. Trans. Librett, Jeffrey S.. Albany: SUNY Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Cronk, Nicholas. The Classical Sublime: French Neoclassicism and the Language of Literature. Charlottesville, VA: Rockwood Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Crowther, Paul. The Kantian Sublime: From Morality to Art. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Crowther, Paul. “Authentic Moral Commitment: Kant’s Phenomenology of Respect.” Filozofski Vestnik 13, no. 2 (1993): 43–57.Google Scholar
Crowther, Paul. Critical Aesthetics and Postmodernism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Crowther, Paul. The Kantian Aesthetic: From Knowledge to the Avant-Garde. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtius, Ernst Robert. European Literature in the Latin Middle Ages. Trans. Trask, Willard R.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur. “Narrative Sentences.” History and Theory 2, no. 2 (1962): 146–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danto, Arthur.“Barnett Newman and the Heroic Sublime.” The Nation, June 17, 2002. http://www.thenation.com/article/barnett-newmanand-heroic-sublime, accessed August 9, 2013.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. “Kant on Respect, Dignity, and the Duty of Respect.” In: Kant’s Ethics of Virtue. Ed. Betzler, Monika. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 2008: 175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bolla, Peter. The Discourse of the Sublime: Readings in History, Aesthetics and the Subject. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar
Declercq, Gilles. “Boileau-Huet: la Querelle du Fiat lux.” Biblio 17 83 (1994): 237–62. (Actes du Colloque de Caen Pierre-Daniel Huet [1630–1721]).Google Scholar
Delehanty, Ann T. “Mapping the Aesthetic Mind: John Dennis and Nicolas Boileau.” Journal of the History of Ideas 68, no. 2 (2007): 233–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Man, Paul. Aesthetic Ideology. Ed. and intro. Warminski, Andrezej. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Demetrius, . On Style. Trans. Trans. Innes, Doreen C. and Roberts, W. Rhys. In: Aristotle Poetics, Longinus On the Sublime, Demetrius On Style (Loeb Classical Library). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Dennis, John. The Critical Works of John Dennis. 2 vols. Ed. Hooker, Edward Niles. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1943.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. The Truth in Painting. Trans. Bennington, Geoff and McLeod, Ian. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. The Gift of Death. Trans. Wills, David. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Dewar-Watson, Sarah. “Shakespeare and Aristotle.” Literature Compass 1, no. 1 (January 2003–December 2004). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2004.87.x/abstract, accessed, February 12, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickie, George. The Century of Taste: The Philosophical Odyssey of Taste in the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dionysius of Halicarnassus. The Three Literary Letters. Ed. Roberts, W. Rhys. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1901.Google Scholar
Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Dionysius of Halicarnassus On Literary Composition. Edited with introduction, translation, notes, glossary, and appendices, by Roberts, W. Rhys. London: Macmillan, 1910.Google Scholar
Doncieux, George. Le Père Bouhours: Un jésuite homme de lettres (1886). Geneva: Slatkine Reprints, 1970.Google Scholar
Doran, Robert. “Literary History and the Sublime in Erich Auerbach’s Mimesis,” New Literary History 38, no. 2 (2007): 353–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doran, Robert. “Mimesis and Aesthetic Redemption.” In: Rethinking Mimesis: Concepts and Practices of Literary Representation. Eds. Isomaa, S., Kivistö, S., Lyytikäinen, P., Nyqvist, S., Polvinen, M., and Rossi, R.. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2012: 201–25.Google Scholar
Doran, Robert. “Imitation and Originality: Creative Mimesis in Longinus, Kant, and Girard.” In: René Girard and Creative Mimesis, ed. Redekop, Vern Neufeld and Ryba, Thomas. Plymouth: Lexington Books, 2014: 111–22.Google Scholar
Dubos, Jean Baptiste. Réflexions critiques sur la poésie et la peinture (1719). Paris: Ecole Nationale Superièure des Beaux-Arts, 1993.Google Scholar
Dubos, Jean Baptiste. Critical Reflections on Poetry, Painting and Music. With an Inquiry into the Rise and Progress of the Theatrical Entertainments of the Ancients. London: J. Nourse, 1748.Google Scholar
Duro, Paul. “Observations on the Burkean sublime.” Word & Image: A Journal of Verbal/Visual Enquiry 29, no. 1 (2013): 40–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, James. “Rhetoric and Poetic in Milton’s Polemics of 1659–60.” Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 31, no. 1 (2013): 73–110.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert. The Civilizing Process: Vol. 1: The History of Manners. Oxford: Blackwell, 1969; Vol. 2: Power and Civility. Oxford: Blackwell, 1982.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Frances. Solitude and the Sublime: Romanticism and the Aesthetics of Individuation. New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Flory, Dan. “Stoic Psychology, Classical Rhetoric, and Theories of Imagination in Western Philosophy.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 29, no. 2 (1996): 147–67.Google Scholar
Forsey, Jane. “Is a Theory of the Sublime Possible?” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65, no. 4 (2007): 381–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fry, Paul. The Reach of Criticism: Method and Perception in Literary Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Fumaroli, Marc. L’Âge de l’éloquence: rhétorique et “res literaria” de la Renaissance au seuil de l’époque classique. Geneva: Droz, 1980.Google Scholar
Furniss, Tom. Edmund Burke’s Aesthetic Ideology: Language, Gender and Political Economy in Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. Trans. Weinsheimer, Joel and Marshall, Donald G.. New York: Continuum, 1989.Google Scholar
Gasché, Rodolphe. The Idea of Form: Rethinking Kant’s Aesthetics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Gasché, Rodolphe. “… And the Beautiful? Revisiting Edmund Burke’s ‘Double Aesthetics.’” In: The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present. Ed. Costelloe, Timothy M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012: 24–36.Google Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel. Le désenchantement du monde: une histoire politique de la religion. Paris: Gallimard, 1985.Google Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel. The Disenchantment of the World: A Political History of Religion. Trans. Burge, Oscar. Fwd. Taylor, Charles. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel. La révolution moderne: L’avènement de la démocratie I. Paris: Gallimard, 2007.Google Scholar
Gerard, Alexander. An Essay on Genius (1774). https://archive.org/details/essayongenius00gera.Google Scholar
Giacomini, Lorenzo. Discorso del furor poetico (1587). In: Trattati di poetica e retorica del Cinquecento, vol. 3. Ed. Weinberg, Bernard. Bari: G. Laterza, 1972.Google Scholar
Gibbon, Edward. The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions, 1998.Google Scholar
Girard, René. Deceit, Desire, and the Novel: Self and Other in Literary Structure. Trans. Freccero, Yvonne. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Girard, René. Mimesis and Theory: Essays on Literature and Criticism, 1953–2005. Ed. Doran, Robert. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldthwait, John. Introduction. Observations on the Beautiful and Sublime (1764). Trans. Goldthwait, John T.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1960: 1–38.Google Scholar
Gould, Thomas. The Ancient Quarrel between Poetry and Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goyet, Francis. “Le Pseudo-Sublime de Longin.” Etudes Littéraires 24, no. 3 (1992): 105–20.Google Scholar
Goyet, Francis. Le sublime du “lieu commun”: L’invention rhétorique dans l’Antiquité et à la Renaissance. Paris: Champion, 1993.Google Scholar
Goyet, Francis. “Introduction.” Longin, Traité du Sublime. Ed. Goyet, Francis. Paris: Le Livre de Poche, 1995.Google Scholar
Goyet, Francis. “Longin, le sublime et la guerre.” Studi di letteratura francese 22 (1997): 105–18.Google Scholar
Goyet, Francis. “Raison et sublime dans le premier livre de l’Art poétique de Boileau.” In: La littérature et le sublime. Ed. Marot, Partick. Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail, 2007: 137–60.Google Scholar
Graziani, Françoise. “Le miracle de l’art: Le Tasse et la poétique de la meravigla. ” Revue des Etudes Italiennes 42, no. 1–2 (1996): 117–39.Google Scholar
Grube, G. M. A. “Notes on the Peri hypsous.” American Journal of Philology 78 (1957): 355–74.Google Scholar
Grube, G. M. A.. “Introduction.” Longinus, . On Great Writing. Trans. Grube, G. M. A.. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1991: vii–xxi.Google Scholar
Guerlac, Suzanne. “Longinus and the Subject of the Sublime.” New Literary History 16, no. 2 (1985): 275–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grube, G. M. A.. The Impersonal Sublime: Hugo, Baudelaire, Lautreamont. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Experience of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. Values of Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “Translator’s Introduction.” In: Kant, Immanuel, Anthropology, History, and Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007: 18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul. “The German Sublime after Kant.” In: The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present. Ed. Costelloe, Timothy M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012: 102–17.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul. A History of Modern Aesthetics. 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Halliwell, Stephen. The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliwell, Stephen. Between Ecstasy and Truth: Interpretations of Greek Poetics from Homer to Longinus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Pierre. Du Sublime: Boileau à Schiller. Strasbourg: Presses Universitaire de Strasbourg, 1997.Google Scholar
Hasselquist, D. Fredrik. Reise nach Palästina in den Jaren 1749–1752. Johann Christian Koppe, 1762.Google Scholar
Heath, Malcolm. “Longinus, On Sublimity.” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 45 (1999): 43–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Malcolm. “Longinus, On Sublimity 35 no. 1.” The Classical Quarterly 50, no. 1 (2000): 320–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Malcolm. “Longinus and the Ancient Sublime.” In: The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present. Ed. Costelloe, Timothy M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012: 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Malcolm. Ancient Philosophical Poetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. “What is Metaphysics?” (1929). http://www.stephenhicks.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/heideggerm-what-is-metaphysics.pdf.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time: A Translation of Sein und Zeit. Trans. Stambaugh, Joan. Albany: SUNY Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Henn, T. R. Longinus and English Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1934.Google Scholar
Herrick, Marvin T. The Fusion of Horatian and Aristotelian Literary Criticism, 1531–1555. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1946.Google Scholar
Hesiod, , Works and Days. Trans. Evelyn-White, Hugh G.. http://www.sacred-texts.com/cla/hesiod/works.htm, accessed January 17, 2013.Google Scholar
Hipple, Walter John. The Beautiful, the Sublime, & the Picturesque in Eighteenth-Century British Aesthetic Theory. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Roald, and Whyte, Iain Boyd. Beyond the Finite: The Sublime in Art and Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Horace, . Art of Poetry. http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/9175/pg9175-images.html, accessed April 4, 2015.Google Scholar
Huet, Pierre-Daniel. Demonstratio evangelica (1672). http://books.google.com/books?id=Y68WAAAAQAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false, accessed April 18, 2013.Google Scholar
Huet, Pierre-Daniel. “Lettre de M. Huet à M. Le Duc de Montausier” (1683). In: Mémoires de Daniel Huet. Trans. Nisard, Charles. Paris: Hachette, 1853: 275–91.Google Scholar
Hughes, Fiona. Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgment: A Reader’s Guide. New York: Continuum, 2009.Google Scholar
Hume, David. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals (1751). http://www.gutenberg.org/files/4320/4320-h/4320-h.htm.Google Scholar
Innes, Doreen. “Longinus: Structure and Unity.” In: Abbenes, J. G. et al. Greek Literary Theory after Aristotle. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Innes, Doreen. “Longinus, Sublimity, and the Low Emotions.” In: Ethics and Rhetoric: Critical Essays for Donald Russell on His Seventy-Fifth Birthday, Ed. Innes, Doreen, Hine, Harry, and Pelling, Christopher. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995: 323–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innes, Doreen. “Longinus and Caecilius: Models of the Sublime.” Mnemosyne 55, no. 3 (2002): 259–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Trans. Dowdell, Victor Lyle. Ed. Rudnick, Hans H.. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. Trans. Pluhar, Werner. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Religion and Rational Theology. Trans. Wood, Allen and de Giovanni, George. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Practical Philosophy. Ed. and trans. Gregor, Mary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Ed. and trans. Guyer, Paul and Matthews, Eric, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Anthropology, History, Education. Ed. Zoller, Gunter and Louden, Robert B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Lectures on Anthropology. Ed. Louden, Robert B. and Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemal, Salim. Kant and Fine Art: An Essay on Kant and the Philosophy of Fine Art and Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. A New History of Classical Rhetoric. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Kinneavy, James. “Kairos in Classical and Modern Rhetoric.” In: Rhetoric and Kairos: Essays in History, Theory, and Praxis. Ed. Sipora, Phillip and Baumlin, James S.. Albany: SUNY Press, 2002: 58–76.Google Scholar
Kirwan, James. Sublimity: The Non-Rational and the Rational in the History of Aesthetics. New York: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Kramnick, Issac. The Rage of Edmund Burke: Portrait of an Ambivalent Conservative. New York: Basic Books, 1977.Google Scholar
LaCapra, Dominick. History, Literature, and Critical Theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. Laocoön: An Essay on the Limits of Painting and Poetry (1766). Trans. McCormick, Edward Allen. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Levine, Joseph M. Between the Ancients and Moderns: Baroque Culture in Restoration England. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689). London: Everyman, 1947/1993.Google Scholar
Lollini, Massimo. Le muse, le maschere e il sublime: G. B. Vico e la poesia nell’età della “Ragione Spiegata.” Naples: Guida, 1994.Google Scholar
Longinus, . Dionysii Longini rhetoris praestantissimi liber de grandi sive sublimi orationis genere. Ed. Robortello, F.. Basel, 1554.Google Scholar
Longinus, . Dionysii Longini De sublimi genere dicendi. Ed. Manutius, P.. Venice, 1555.Google Scholar
Longinus, . Dionysii Longini De grandi sive sublimi genere orationis. Ed. Porto, F.. Geneva, 1569.Google Scholar
Longinus, . Dionysii Longini de Sublimi dicendi genere liber a Petro Pagano latinitate donatus. Ed. Pagano, P.. Venice, 1572.Google Scholar
Longinus, . Dionysii Longini… De grandi sive sublimi genere orationis. Ed. de Petra, G.. Geneva, 1612.Google Scholar
Longinus, . Dionysiou Longinou rhētoros Peri hypsous logou biblion: Dionysii Longini rhetoris præstantissimi liber De grandi loquentia sive sublimi dicendi genere Latine redditus hypothesesi synoptikais et ad oram notationibus aliquot illustrates. Ed. Langbaine, G.. Oxford, 1636/1638.Google Scholar
Longinus, . Peri hypsous, or, Dionysius Longinus of the height of eloquence. Rendered out of the original by J. H. Esq. Ed. and trans. Hall, John. London: Daniel, 1652.Google Scholar
Longinus, . Dionysii Longini philosophi et rhetoris Peri Hypsous libellus, cum notis, emendationibus et praefatione. Ed. Faber, T.. Salmurii, 1663.Google Scholar
Longinus, . Dionysii Longini De Sublimitate commentarius ceteraque quae reperiri potuere. Tollius, J.. Utrecht, 1694. (First reprint of Robortello’s Latin marginalia.)Google Scholar
Longinus, . Dionysius Longinus on the Sublime. Ed. and trans. Smith, William. London, 1739.Google Scholar
Longinus, . Dionysius Longin vom Erhabenen: Griechisch und Teutsch; Nebst dessen Leben, einer Nachricht von seinen Schrifften, und einer Untersuchung, was Longin durch das Erhabene verstehte. Trans. von Heinecken, Karl Heinrich. Dresden, 1737/1742.Google Scholar
Longinus, . Dionysii Longini De sublimitate. Ed. Benjamin Weiske. Leipzig: Weigel, 1809.Google Scholar
Longinus, . Longinus On the Sublime. Trans. Havell, H. L.. London: Macmillan, 1890. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/17957/17957-h/17957-h.htm.Google Scholar
Longinus, . On the Sublime (1899). Ed., notes, trans., Roberts, W. Rhys. Second ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1907.Google Scholar
Longinus, . “Longinus” on the Sublime. Ed. Russell, D. A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Longinus, . On Sublimity. Trans. Russell, D. A.. In: Ancient Literary Criticism: The Principal Texts in New Translations. Eds. Russell, D. A. and Winterbottom, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Longinus, . On the Sublime. Trans. with commentary by Arieti, James and Crossett, John M.. New York: Edwin Mellen Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Longinus, . On Great Writing (On the Sublime). Trans. Grube, G. M. A.. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1991.Google Scholar
Longinus, . Traité du sublime (1674/1683/1701)
. Trans. Boileau, . Ed. and intro. Goyet, Francis. Paris: Le Livre de Poche, 1995.Google Scholar
Longinus, . Aristotle Poetics, Longinus On the Sublime, Demetrius On Style (Loeb Classical Library). Trans. Halliwell, Stephen (Aristotle), Trans. Fyfe, W. Hamilton and Ed. Russell, D. A. (Longinus), Trans. Innes, Doreen C. and Roberts, W. Rhys (Demetrius). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Longinus, . Dionisio Longino, Del sublime. Ed. Mazzucchi, C. M.. Milan: Vita E Pensiero, 2010.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Beatrice. Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. Trans. Van Den Abbeele, Georges. Minneaopolis: University of Minnosota Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. The Inhuman: Reflections on Time. Trans. Bennington, Geoffrey and Bowlby, Rachel. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. Lessons on the Analytic of the Sublime. Trans. Rottenberg, Elizabeth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Malm, Mats. “On the Technique of the Sublime.” Comparative Literature 52, no. 1 (2000): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marin, Louis. “Le sublime dans les années 1670.” Papers on French XVIIth-century Literature 25 (1986): 185–201.Google Scholar
Marin, Louis“1674: On the Sublime, Infinity, Je ne sais quoi.” In: A New History of French Literature. Ed. Hollier, Denis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989/1994: 340–45.Google Scholar
Marshall, David. The Surprising Effects of Sympathy: Marivaux, Rousseau, Diderot, and Mary Shelley. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Marshall, David L. Vico and the Transformation of Rhetoric in Early Modern Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Eva Madeleine. “The ‘Prehistory’ of the Sublime in Early Modern France: An Interdisciplinary Perspective.” In: The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present. Ed. Costelloe, Timothy M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012: 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, Marsh. Ancient Rhetorical Theories of Simile and Comparison. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meerbote, Ralf. “The Unknowability of Things in Themselves.” Proceedings of the 3rd International Kant Congress. Ed. Beck, Lewis White. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1972: 415–23.Google Scholar
Meier, Georg Friedrich. Betrachtungen über den ersten Grundsatz aller schönen Künste und Wissenschaften. Halle: Carl Hermann Hemmerde, 1757.Google Scholar
Mendelssohn, Moses. Philosophical Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menninghaus, Winfried. Disgust: Theory and History of a Strong Sensation. Trans. Eiland, Howard and Golb, Joel. Albany: SUNY Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, Melissa McBay. “The Moral Source of the Kantian Sublime.” In: The Sublime: From Antiquity to the Present. Ed. Costelloe, Timothy M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012: 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, John. Paradise Lost (1667/1674). http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/20/pg20.html.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. J. T. Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monk, Samuel H. The Sublime: A Study of Critical Theories in XVIII-Century England. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1935.Google Scholar
Morris, David B. The Religious Sublime: Christian Poetry and the Critical Tradition. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1972.Google Scholar
Morris, David B.. “Gothic Sublimity.” New Literary History 16, no. 2 (1985): 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murry, Penelope. “Poetic Inspiration in Early Greece.” Journal of Hellenistic Studies 101 (1981): 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nahm, M. C. “‘Sublimity’ and the ‘Moral Law’ in Kant’s Philosophy.” Kant-Studien 48 (1957): 502–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nehamas, Alexander. Virtues of Authenticity: Essays on Plato and Socrates. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick. Rousseau’s Theodicy of Self-Love: Evil, Rationality, and the Drive for Recognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Barnett. “The Sublime Is Now.” In: Barnett Newman: Selected Writings and Interviews. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1990: 170–3.Google Scholar
Nicolson, Marjorie Hope. Mountain Gloom and Mountain Glory: The Development of the Aesthetics of the Infinite (1959). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. “Homer on Competition.” In: On the Genealogy of Morality. Trans. Diethe, Carol, ed. Ansell-Pearson, Keith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994: 187–94.Google Scholar
Norman, Larry F. The Shock of the Ancient: Literature and History in Early Modern France. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parret, Herman. “From the Enquiry (1757) to the Fourth Kritisches Wäldchen (1769): Burke and Herder on the Division of the Senses.” In: The Science of Sensibility: Reading Burke’s Philosophical Enquiry. Ed. Vermeir, Koen and Decard, Michael Funk. New York: Springer, 2012: 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partridge, E. Origins: An Etymological Dictionary of Modern English. New York: Macmillan, 1958.Google Scholar
Patrizi, Francesco. Della Poetica (1586). Ed. Barbagli, Danilo Aguzzi. Florence: Istituto Nazionale di Studi sul Rinascimento, 1969–71.Google Scholar
Paul, H. G. John Dennis: His Life and Criticism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1911.Google Scholar
Pender, Elizabeth. “Spiritual Pregnancy in Plato’s Symposium.” Classical Quarterly 42 (1992): 72–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrault, Charles. Parallèle des Anciens et des Modernes en ce qui regarde les Arts et la Science. Paris: Jean Baptiste Coignard, 1688.Google Scholar
Peyrache-Leborgne, Dominique. La poétique du sublime de la fin des Lumières au Romantisme. Paris: Honoré Champion, 1997.Google Scholar
Phillips, Adam. “Introduction.” Edmund Burke, A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful. Ed. Phillips, Adam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Pillow, Kirk. Sublime Understanding: Aesthetic Reflection in Kant and Hegel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Pinkard, Terry. German Philosophy 1760–1860: The Legacy of Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, . Complete Works. Ed. Cooper, John M.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, 1997.Google Scholar
Platt, Peter G. “‘Not Before either Known or Dreamt of’: Francesco Patrizi and the Power of Wonder in Renaissance Poetics.” Review of English Studies 43 (1992): 387–94.Google Scholar
Pocock, Gordon. Boileau and the Nature of Neo-Classicism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Pope, Alexander. “Essay on Criticism” (1709). http://poetry.eserver.org/essay-on-criticism.html.Google Scholar
Pope, Alexander, Gay, John, and Arbuthnot, John. Three Hours after Marriage (1717). http://www.gutenberg.org/files/37667/37667-h/37667-h.htm.Google Scholar
Porter, James. The Sublime in Antiquity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Quint, David. Epic and Empire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quint, David. Cervantes’s Novel of Modern Times: A New Reading of Don Quijote. Princeton, NJ: Princeton, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Race, W. H. “The Word Kairos in Greek Drama.”Transactions of the American Philological Association 111 (1981): 197–213.Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. Aisthesis: Scènes du régime esthétique de l’art. Paris: Galilée, 2011.Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. Aisthesis: Scenes from the Aesthetic Regime of Art. Trans. Paul, Zakir. London: Verso, 2013.Google Scholar
Rapin, René. Les Réflexions sur la poétique de ce temps et sur les ouvrages des poètes anciens et modernes (1674/1675). Ed. Dubois, E.T.. Geneva: Droz, 1970.Google Scholar
Refini, Eugenio. “Longinus and Poetic Imagination in Late Renaissance Literary Theory.” In: Translations of the Sublime: The Early Modern Reception and Dissemination of Longinus’ Peri Hupsous in Rhetoric, the Visual Arts, Architecture and the Theatre. Eds. van Eck, Caroline, Bussels, Stijn, Delbeke, Maarten, and Pieters, Jürgen. Leiden: Brill, 2012: 33–53.Google Scholar
Riado, Benjamin. Le Je-ne-sais-quoi: Aux sources d’une théorie esthétique au XVIIe siècle. Paris: L’Harmattan, 2012.Google Scholar
Roberts, Rhys. “The Literary Circle of Dionysius of Halicarnassus,” The Classical Review 14, no. 9 (1900), 439–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard. Take Care of Freedom and Truth Will Take Care of Itself: Interviews with Richard Rorty. Ed. Mendicta, Eduardo. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Discours sur l’origine et les fondements de l’inégalité parmi les hommes (1755). Paris: Flammarion, 2011.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. “De Imitatione.” In: Imitation and Latin Literature. Ed. West, David, Woodman, Tony, and Woodman, Anthony John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979: 1–16.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A.. “Longinus” On the Sublime. Ed., intro., and commentary Russell, D. A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Ryan, Cressida. “Burke’s Classical Heritage: Playing Games with Longinus.” In: The Science of Sensibility: Reading Burke’s Philosophical Enquiry. Ed. Vermeir, Koen and Decard, Michael Funk. New York: Springer 2012: 225–45.Google Scholar
Saint Girons, Baldine. Fiat lux: Une philosophie du sublime. Paris: Quai Voltaire, 1993.Google Scholar
Saint Girons, Baldine.. Le sublime de l’antiquité à nos jours. Paris: Desjonquères, 2005.Google Scholar
Savary, Nicholas. Lettres sur l’Egypte où l’on offre le parallèle des mœurs anciennes et modernes et de ses habitants, Paris: 1786.Google Scholar
Schulte-Sasse, Jochen. “Herder’s Concept of the Sublime.” In: Herder Today: Contributions from the International Herder Conference. Ed. Mueller-Vollmer, Kurt. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1990.Google Scholar
Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper, Third Earl of. Sensus Communis, an Essay on the Freedom of Wit and Humour (1709). http://ebooks.cambridge.org/chapter.jsf?bid=CBO9780511803284&cid=CBO9780511803284A014.Google Scholar
Shapshay, Sandra. “Schopenhauer’s Transformation of the Kantian Sublime.” Kantian Review 17 no. 3 (2012): 479–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shell, Susan. “Kant as Spectator: Notes on Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and the Sublime.” In: New Essays on the Precritical Kant. Ed. Rockmore, Tom. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books 2001: 66–85.Google Scholar
Shell, Susan. “Kant as Propagator: Reflections on Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 35, no. 3 (2002): 455–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiner, Whitney. Proclaiming the Gospel: First-Century Performance of Mark. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 2003.Google Scholar
Shuger, Debora K. “The Grand Style and the genera dicendi in Ancient Rhetoric.” Traditio 40 (1984): 1–42.Google Scholar
Sircello, Guy. “How Is a Theory of the Sublime Possible?” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 51, no. 4 (1993): 541–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759). New York: Prometheus Books, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch.Theologico-Political Treatise (1670). http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/spinoza/benedict/treatise/chapter7.html.Google Scholar
Spencer, T. J. B. “Longinus in English Criticism: Influences before Milton.” The Review of English Studies 8, no. 30 (1957): 137–43.Google Scholar
Stendhal, . Le Rouge et le Noir (1830). http://www.gutenberg.org/files/798/798-h/798-h.htm.Google Scholar
Stone, Lawrence. The Crisis of the Aristocracy, 1558–1641. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Struever, Nancy S. “Alltäglichkeit, Timefulness, in the Heideggerian Program.” Heidegger and Rhetoric. Eds. Gross, Daniel M. and Kemmann, Ansgar. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2005: 105–30.Google Scholar
Tasso, Torquato. Discourses on the Heroic Poem. Trans. Cavalchini, Marialla and Samuel, Irene. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Till, Dietmar. “The Sublime and the Bible: Longinus, Protestant Dogmatics, and the ‘Sublime Style.’” In: Translations of the Sublime: The Early Modern Reception and Dissemination of Longinus’ Peri Hupsous in Rhetoric, the Visual Arts, Architecture and the Theatre. Ed. van Eck, Caroline, Bussels, Stijn, Delbeke, Maarten, and Pieters, Jürgen. Leiden: Brill, 2012: 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trédé, Monique. Kairos: L’à-propos et l’occasion (le mot et la notion, d’Homère à la fin du IVe siècle avant J.-C.). Paris: Editions Klincsieck, 1992.Google Scholar
Walker, Jeffrey. Rhetoric and Poetics in Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, George B. “Sublime Method: Longinus on Language and Imitation.” Classical Antiquity 7, no. 2 (1988): 252–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Gerard. Phantasia in Classical Thought. Galway: Galway University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Weber, Samuel. Benjamin’s –abilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, Bernard. “Translations and Commentaries of Longinus, On the Sublime, to 1600: A Bibliography.” Modern Philology 47, no. 3 (1950): 145–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, Bernard. A History of Literary Criticism in the Italian Renaissance. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Bernard. “Une Traduction Française du ‘Sublime’ de Longin Vers 1645.” Modern Philology 59, no. 3 (1962): 159–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiskel, Thomas. The Romantic Sublime: Studies in the Structure and Psychology of Transcendence. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, David, Woodman, Tony, and Woodman, Anthony John, eds. Creative Imitation and Latin Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Hayden. The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
White, Luke, and Pajaczkowska, Claire. The Sublime Now. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2009.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen. Kant’s Rational Theology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1978/2009.Google Scholar
Vardoulakis, Dimitrios. “The Play of Logos and Pathos: Longinus’ Philosophical Presuppositions.” In: Greek Research in Australia: Proceedings of the Fourth Biennial Conference of Greek Studies. Ed. Close, E., Tsianikas, M., and Frazis, G.. Adelaide: Flinders University Press, 2003: 47–62.Google Scholar
Vasalou, Sophia. Schopenhauer and the Aesthetic Standpoint: Philosophy as a Practice of the Sublime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Verene, Donald Phillip. Vico’s Science of the Imagination. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Vermeir, Koen, and Deckard, Michael Funk, Eds. The Science of Sensibility: Reading Burke’s Philosophical Enquiry. New York: Springer, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vico, Giambattista. “On the Heroic Mind” (1732). In: Vico and Contemporary Thought. Eds. Tagliacozzo, Giorgio, Mooney, Michael, and Verene, Donald Phillip. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities, 1976.Google Scholar
Vico, Giambattista. “De mente heroica” (1732). http://www.ispfab.cnr.it/article/Testi_Ed_Critica_DeMenteHeroicaDef_Rev.Google Scholar
Vico, Giambattista. The New Science of Giambattista Vico. Trans. Bergin, Thomas Goddard and Fisch, Max Harold. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Vico, Giambattista. La scienza nuova (1725/1744). Ed. Rossi, Paolo. Milan: Biblioteca Universale Rizzoli, 1977.Google Scholar
Young, Edward. Conjectures on Original Composition. London: A. Millar and R. and J. Dodsley, 1759.Google Scholar
Zammito, John H. The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Zuckert, Rachel. “Awe or Envy: Herder contra Kant on the Sublime.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 61, no. 3 (2003), 217–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar