Aaronson, N. K., Acquadro, C., Alonso, J., Apolone, G., Bucquet, D., Bullinger, M., Bungay, K., Fukuhara, S., Gandek, B., Keller, S., Razavi, D., Sanson-Fisher, R., Sullivan, M., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Wagner, A., & Ware, J. E. (1992). International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Quality of Life Research, 1, 349–351.Google Scholar

Abedi, J. (2013). Testing of English language learner students. In Geisinger, K. (Ed.), APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology (vol. 3) pp. 355–368. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Aday, L. A., Chiu, G. Y., & Anderson, R. (1980). Methodological issues in health care surveys of the Spanish heritage population. American Journal of Public Health, 70, 367–374.Google Scholar

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2005). CAHPS guidelines for assessing and selecting translators and reviewers (Final draft January 2005). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Retrieved on August 20, 2016 from www.ahrq.gov/cahps/surveys-guidance/helpful-resources/resources/cahpsguidelines_translation.html.Google Scholar

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2016). Guidelines for Translating CAHPS Surveys (Content last reviewed March 2016). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Retrieved on August 20, 2016 from www.ahrq.gov/cahps/surveys-guidance/helpful-resources/resources/cahpsguidelines_translation.html.Google Scholar

Aguilar, A., Tous, J. M., & Pueyo, A. A. (1990). Adaptacion y estudio psicometrico del EPQ-R. Anuario de Psicologia, 46, 101–118.Google Scholar

Alario, F. X., & Ferrand, L. (1999). A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 31, 531–552.Google Scholar

Albu, M., & Pitariu, H. D. (1991). Algoritm de construire a unei scale pentru un test psihologic: Contribuții la reproiectarea scalei F/M a inventarului psihologic California [An algorithm for the construction of a scales for a psychological test: contributions to a redesign of the F/M scale of the California Psychological Inventory]. Psihologie-Pedagogie, 36(2), 30–35.Google Scholar

Albu, M., & Pitariu, H. D. (1999). Evaluarea anxietății cu ajutorul Inventarului Psihologic California [Anxiety Assessment with the California Psychological Inventory]. Studii de Psihologie, 4, 19–32.Google Scholar

Allalouf, A., Bastari, B., Hambleton, R. K., & Sireci, S. G. (1997). Comparing the dimensionality of a test administered in two languages. Laboratory of Psychometric and Evaluative research report no. 319. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, School of Education.Google Scholar

Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (1994). Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity. BMJ, 308(6943), 1552.Google Scholar

Aluja, A., Garcia, O., Garcia, L. F., & Seisdedos, N. (2005). Invariance of the NEO-PI-R structure across exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1879–1889.Google Scholar

American Association for Mental Retardation. (1992). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (9th ed.). Washington, DC: AAMR.Google Scholar

American Association for Mental Retardation. (2002). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of support. Washington, DC: AAMR.Google Scholar

American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) (2014). Standards for Education and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: AERA.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar

Anderson, N., Schlueter, J. E., Carlson, J. F., & Geisinger, K. F. (Eds.) (2016). Tests in Print IX: An index to tests, test reviews, and the literature on specific tests. Lincoln, NE: The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.Google Scholar

Anderson, R. T., Aaronson, N. K., & Wilkin, D. (1993). Critical review of the international assessments of health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 2, 369–395.Google Scholar

Angoff, W. H. (1971). Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In Thorndike, R. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed., pp. 508–600). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar

Angoff, W. H. (1972). A technique for the investigation of cultural differences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Honolulu. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 069686.Google Scholar

Angoff, W. H. (1993). Perspectives on differential item functioning methodology. In Holland, P. W. & Wainer, H. (Eds.), Differential item functioning (pp. 3–23). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Applegate, A., & Applegate, M. (2004). The Peter Effect: Reading habits and attitudes of preservice teachers. The Reading Teacher, 57, 554–563.Google Scholar

Applegate, A., & Applegate, M., (2014). The Peter Effect revisited: Reading habits and attitudes of college students. Literacy Research and Instruction, 53(3), 188–204.Google Scholar

Arends-Toth, J. V., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2007). Cultural and gender differences in gender-role beliefs, sharing household-task and child-care responsibilities, and well-being among immigrants and majority members in the Netherlands. Sex Roles, 57(11–12), 813–824.Google Scholar

Arends-Toth, J. V., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2009). Cultural differences in family, marital, and gender-role values among immigrants and majority members in the Netherlands. International Journal of Psychology, 44(3), 161–169.Google Scholar

Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166.Google Scholar

Asparouhov, T., & Muthen, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438.Google Scholar

Asparouhov, T., Muthen, B., & Morin, A. J. S. (2015). Bayesian structural equation modeling with cross-loadings and residual covariances: Comments on Stromeyer et al. Journal of Management, 41, 1561–1577.Google Scholar

Auslander, P. (1998). Seeing is believing: Live performance and the discourse of authenticity in rock culture. Literature and Psychology, 44(4), 1–26.Google Scholar

Austin, P. C. (2008). A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 72, 2037–2049.Google Scholar

Austin, P. C. (2009). Some methods of propensity-score matching had superior performance to others: Results of an empirical investigation and Monte Carlo simulations. Biometrical Journal, 51(1), 171–184.Google Scholar

Azuma, H., & Kashiwagi, K. (1987). Descriptors for an intelligent person: A Japanese study. Japanese Psychological Research, 29, 17–26.Google Scholar

Bachman, J. G., & O’Malley, P. M. (1984). Yea-saying, nay-saying and going to extremes: Black-white differences in response styles. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 491–509.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Short-term phonological memory and long-term learning: A single case study. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5, 129–148.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 575–589.Google Scholar

Bailin, A., & Grafstein, A. (2001). The linguistic assumptions underlying readability formulae: A critique. Language and Communication, 21(3), 285–301.Google Scholar

Banerjee, A. (2012). Cross-cultural variance of schizophrenia in symptoms, diagnosis and treatment. Georgetown University Journal of Health Sciences, 6(2), 18–24.Google Scholar

Banks, J. A. (2015). Cultural diversity and education: Foundations, curriculum, and teaching (6th ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Banks, K. (2006). A comprehensive framework for evaluating hypotheses about cultural bias in educational testing. Applied Measurement in Education, 19(2), 115–132.Google Scholar

Bar-On, R. (1997). Emotional quotient inventory - A measure of emotional intelligence: Technical manual. Toronto, ON: MHS.Google Scholar

Barrett, P. T. (2010) Test reliability and validity: The inappropriate use of the Pearson and other variance ratio coefficients for indexing reliability and validity. Technical Whitepaper #9. Downloaded from www.pbarrett.net.Google Scholar

Barrett, P., & Rolland, J.-P. (2009). The meta-analytic correlation between two Big Five factors: Something is not quite right in the woodshed. Strategic Whitepaper #3. Retrieved August 8, 2016 from www.pbarrett.net/stratpapers/metacorr.pdf.Google Scholar

Barry, C. L., Horst, S. J., Finney, S. J., Brown, A. R., & Kopp, J. P. (2010). Do examinees have similar test-taking effort? A high-stakes question for low-stakes testing. International Journal of Testing, 10(4), 342–363.Google Scholar

Bartram, D. (2002a). EFPA Review Model for the description and evaluation of psychological instruments: Version 3.2. Evaluation Form. Brussels: EFPA Standing Committee on Tests and Testing (September, 2002).Google Scholar

Bartram, D. (2002b). EFPA Review Model for the description and evaluation of psychological instruments: Version 3.2. Notes for Reviewers. Brussels: EFPA Standing Committee on Tests and Testing (September, 2002).Google Scholar

Bartram, D. (2007). Increasing validity with forced-choice criterion measurement formats. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 263–272.Google Scholar

Bartram, D. (2008). Global norms: Towards some guidelines for aggregating personality norms across countries. International Journal of Testing, 8, 315–333.Google Scholar

Bartram, D. (2016). Norming. In Leong, F. T. L., Bartram, D., Cheung, F. M., Geisinger, K. F., & Iliescu, D. (2016). The ITC international handbook of testing and assessment (pp. 438–448). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bauman, L. J., & Adair, G. E. (1992). The use of ethnographic interviewing to inform questionnaire construction. Health Education Quarterly, 19(1), 9–23.Google Scholar

Baxter, A. J., Scott, K. M., Vos, T., & Whiteford, H. A. (2013). Global prevalence of anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-regression. Psychological Medicine, 43(5), 897–910.Google Scholar

Bayley, N. (2006). Bayley Scales for Infant and Toddler Development. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.Google Scholar

Beatty, P. (2004). The dynamics of cognitive interviewing. In Presser, S., Rothgeb, J., Couper, M., Lessler, J., Martin, E., Martin, J. & Singer, E. (Eds.), Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires (pp. 45–66). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Beatty, P., & Willis, G. (2007). The practice of cognitive interviewing. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 288–311.Google Scholar

Beatty, P., Willis, G. B., & Schechter, S. (1997). Evaluating the generalizability of cognitive interview findings. In Office of management and budget seminar on statistical methodology in the public service, statistical policy working paper 26, (353–362). Washington, DC: Statistical Policy Office.Google Scholar

Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4(6), 561–571.Google Scholar

Bedard-Gilligan, M., Jaeger, J., Echiverri-Cohen, A., & Zoellner, L. A. (2011). Individual differences in trauma disclosure. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 43(2), 716–723.Google Scholar

Belk, R. W. (1985). Materialism: Trait aspects of living in the material world. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 265–279.Google Scholar

Belson, W. (1981). The design and understanding of survey questions. London: Gower.Google Scholar

Benet-Martinez, V. (2007). Cross-cultural personality research: Conceptual and methodological issues. In Robins, R. W., Fraley, R. C. & Krueger, R. F. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 170–189). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Benet-Martinez, V., & John, O. P. (2000). Toward the development of quasi-indigenous personality constructs: Measuring Los Cinco Grandes in Spain with indigenous Castilian markers. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(1), 141–157.Google Scholar

Bentler, P. M., & Kano, Y. (1990). On the equivalence of factors and components. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 67–74.Google Scholar

Bergner, M., Bobbitt, R. A., Kressel, S., Pollard, W. E., Gilson, B. S., & Morris, J. R. (1976). The Sickness Impact Profile: Conceptual foundation and methodology for the development of a health status measure. International Journal of Health Services, 6(3), 393–415.Google Scholar

Berry, J. W. (1969). On cross-cultural comparability, International Journal of Psychology, 4, 119–128.Google Scholar

Berufsverband Deutscher Psychologen und Psychologinnen (BDP) (2004). English version of the Deutsches Institut fur Norming (2002) DIN 33430: Requirements for proficiency assessment procedures and their implementation. Berlin: Association of German Professional Psychologists.Google Scholar

Bhatnagar, K., & Frank, J. (1997). Psychiatric disorders in elderly from the Indian sub-continent living in Bradford. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 12(9), 907–912.Google Scholar

BICSE [Board on International Comparative Studies in Education Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education National Research Council] (1995). International comparative studies in education: Description of selected large-scale assessments and case studies. Washington, DC: BICSE.Google Scholar

Billiet, J. B., & McClendon, M. J. (1998). On the identification of acquiescence in balanced sets of items using structural models. In Ferligoj, A. (Ed.): Advances in methodology, data analysis and statistics. Ljubljana: FDV.Google Scholar

Billiet, J. B., & McClendon, M. J. (2000). Modeling acquiescence in measurement models for two balanced sets of items. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 608–628.Google Scholar

Bischoping, K., & Dykema, J. (1999). Towards a social psychological program for improving focus group methods of developing questionnaires. Journal of Official Statistics, 15, 495–516.Google Scholar

Björner, J. B., Kreiner, S., Ware, J. W., Damsgaard, M. T., & Bech, P. (1998). Differential item functioning in the Danish translation of the SF-36. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 1189–1202.Google Scholar

Bjornsson, C. H. (1968). Lasbarhet. Liber: Stockholm.Google Scholar

Blair, J., & Presser, S. (1993). Survey procedures for conducting cognitive interviews to pretest questionnaires: A review of theory and practice. Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods of the American Statistical Association, 370–375. Retrieved on June 19, 2016 from www.amstat.org/sections/srms/proceedings/papers.Google Scholar

Block, J. (2010). The five factor framing of personality and beyond: Some ruminations. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 2–25.Google Scholar

Bock, P. K. (2000). Culture and personality revisited. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 32–40.Google Scholar

Bockenholt, U. (2004). Comparative judgments as an alternative to ratings: Identifying the scale origin. Psychological Methods, 9, 453–465.Google Scholar

Boiger, M., & Mesquita, B. (2012). The construction of emotion in interactions, relationships, and cultures. Emotion Review, 4(3), 221–229.Google Scholar

Bond, M. H. (2000). Localizing the imperial outreach: The Big Five and more in Chinese culture. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 63–72.Google Scholar

Bond, M. H., & Hwang, K. K. (1986). The social psychology of Chinese people. In Bond, M. H. (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 213–266). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1990). Comparing exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: A study on the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 515–524.Google Scholar

Borkenau, P., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A., & Spinath, F. M. (2001). Genetic and environmental influences on observed personality: Evidence from the German observational study of adult twins. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(4), 635–668.Google Scholar

Borman, W. C. (1991). Job behavior, performance, and effectiveness. In Dunnette, M. D. & Hough, L. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 271–326). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Borman, W. C., Hedge, J. W., Ferstl, K. L., Kaufman, J. D., Farmer, W. L., & Bearden, R. M. (2003). Current directions and issues in personnel selection and classification. In Martocchio, J. J. & Gerris, G. R. (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management (vol. 22). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Born, M. (2012, July). Validity of CPAI-2 and HEXACO among Chinese-Dutch and indigenous Dutch students. Presented at the 8th Conference of the International Test Commission, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Bouchard, T. J. Jr. (1969). Personality, problem-solving procedure, and performance in small groups. Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 53, 1–29.Google Scholar

Bracken, B. A., & Barona, A. (1991). State of the art procedures for translating, validating and using psychoeducational tests in cross-cultural assessment. School Psychology International, 12, 119–132.Google Scholar

Bridgeman, B. (2004, April). Speededness as a threat to construct validity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Diego, CA. Retrieved Oct. 19, 2004, from the ETS Website: www.ets.org/research/dload/NCME_2004-Bridgeman.pdf.Google Scholar

Briggs-Myers, I., & Briggs, K. C. (1985). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar

Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.Google Scholar

Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In Lonner, W. J. & Berry, J. W. (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 137–164). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Bullinger, M., Anderson, R., Cella, D., & Aaronson, N. (1993). Developing and evaluating cross-cultural instruments from minimum requirements to optimal models. Quality of Life Research, 2, 451–459.Google Scholar

Bullinger, M., Alonso, J., Apolone, G., Leplège, A., Sullivan, M., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Gandek, B., Wagner, A., Aaronson, N., Bech, P., Fukuhara, S., Kaasa, S., & Ware, J. (1998). Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: The IQOLA project approach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 913–923.Google Scholar

Burt, C. (1948). The factorial study of temperament traits. British Journal of Psychology, Statistical Section, 1, 178–203.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M. (2001). Human nature and culture: An evolutionary psychological perspective. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 955–978.Google Scholar

Butcher, J. N., & Han, K. (1995). Development of an MMPI-2 scale to assess the presentation of self in a superlative manner: The S scale. In Butcher, J. N. & Spielberger, C. D. (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 10) (pp. 25–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., & Dahlstrom, W. G. (2001). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: Manual for administration, scoring and interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Byrne, B. M. (2004). Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS graphics: A road less traveled. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11(2), 272–300.Google Scholar

Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis/ Routledge.Google Scholar

Byrne, B. M. (2015). Adaptation of Assessment Scales in Cross-National Research: Issues, Guidelines, and Caveats. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 5(1), 51–65.Google Scholar

Byrne, B. M., & Campbell, T. L. (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: A look beneath the surface. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 555–576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022199030005001Google Scholar

Byrne, B. M., & Watkins, D. (2003). The issue of measurement invariance revisited.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 155–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022102250225.Google Scholar

Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthen, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466.Google Scholar

Byrne, B., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2014). Validating factorial structure of the family values scale from a multilevel-multicultural perspective. International Journal of Testing, 14, 168–192.Google Scholar

Byrne, M. B. (2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: A walk through the process. Psicothema, 20, 872–882.Google Scholar

Camilli, G. (2006). Test fairness. In Brennan, R. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 220–256). Westport, CT: American Council on Education.Google Scholar

Camilli, G., & Shepard, L. A. (1994). Methods for identifying biased test items. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Campinha-Bacote, J. (2002). The process of cultural competence in the delivery of healthcare services: A model of care. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 13(3), 181–184.Google Scholar

Camras, L. A., & Witherington, D. C. (2005). Dynamical systems approaches to emotional development. Developmental Review, 25, 328–350.Google Scholar

Canales, S., Ganz, P. A., & Coscarelli, C. A. (1995). Translation and validation of a quality of life instrument for Hispanic American cancer patients: Methodological considerations. Quality of Life Research, 4, 3–11.Google Scholar

Carugati, F. (1990). From social cognition to social representations in the study of intelligence. In Duveen, G. M. & Lloyd, B. (Eds.), Social representations and the development of knowledge (pp. 126–143). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cattell, R. B. (1945). The description of personality: Principles and findings in a factor analysis. American Journal of Psychology, 58, 69–90.Google Scholar

Cattell, R. B., & Cattell, A. K. S. (1963). Culture fair intelligence test. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Google Scholar

Cattell, R. B., Eber, H. W., & Tatsuoka, M. M. (1988). Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16 PF). Champaign IL: IPAT.Google Scholar

Chalhoub-Deville, M., & Deville, C. (2006). Old, borrowed, and new thoughts in second language testing. In Brennan, R. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed.) (pp. 517–530). Westport, CT: American Council on Education/Praeger.Google Scholar

Chan, A. M. (2006). The Chinese Concepts of Guanxi, Mianzi, Renqing and Bao: Their interrelationships and implications for international business. Presented at the Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conferences, Brisbane, Queensland.Google Scholar

Chan, W., Ho, R. M., Leung, K., Chan, D. K-S., & Yung, Y-F. (1999). An alternative method for evaluating congruence coefficients with Procrustes rotation: A bootstrap procedure. Psychological Methods, 4, 378–402.Google Scholar

Chang, H., & Holt, G. R. (1991). More than relationship: Chinese interpersonal relationships. In Ting-Toomey, S. & Korzenny, F. (Eds.), Cross-cultural interpersonal communication (pp. 28–57). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S., Prewett, M. S., Gray, A. A., Stilson, F. R., & Tuttle, M. D. (2009). Normative scoring of multidimensional pairwise preference personality scales using IRT: Empirical comparisons with other formats. Human Performance, 22, 1–23.Google Scholar

Cheung, F. M. (2004). Use of Western and indigenously developed personality tests in Asia. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 173–191.Google Scholar

Cheung, F. M. (2009). The cultural perspective in personality assessment. In Butcher, J. N. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of personality assessment (pp. 44–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cheung, F. M., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leong, F. T. L. (2011). Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. American Psychologist, 66, 593–603.Google Scholar

Cheung, F. M., Cheung, S. F., Wada, S., & Zhang, J. (2003). Indigenous measures of personality assessment in Asian countries: A review. Psychological Assessment, 15(3), 280–289.Google Scholar

Cheung, F. M., Cheung, S. F., Leung, K., Ward, C., & Leong, F. (2003). The English version of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory: Derived etics in a mirror position. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 433–452.Google Scholar

Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Fan, R. M., Song, W.-Z., Zhang, J.-X., & Zhang, J.-P. (1996). Development of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory (CPAI). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 181–199.Google Scholar

Cheung, F. M., Leung, K., Zhang, J. X., Sun, H. F., Gan, Y. Q., Song, W. Z., & Xie, D. (2001). Indigenous Chinese personality constructs: Is the five-factor model complete? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 407–433.Google Scholar

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2000). Assessing extreme and acquiescence response sets in cross-cultural research using structural equations modeling. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(2), 187–212.Google Scholar

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.Google Scholar

Cheung, S. F., Cheung, F. M., Howard, R., & Lim, Y. H. (2006). Personality across ethnic divide in Singapore: Are Chinese traits uniquely Chinese? Personality and Individual Differences, 41(3), 467–477.Google Scholar

Child, D. (1990). The essentials of factor analysis (2nd ed.). London: Cassel Educational Limited.Google Scholar

Chinese Culture Connection (1987). Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 143–164.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Chow, S. S.-Y., & Chu, M. H.-T. (2007). The impact of filial piety and parental involvement on academic achievement motivation in Chinese secondary school students. Asian Journal of Counselling, 14(1&2), 91-124.Google Scholar

Christiansen, N. D., Burns, G. N., & Montgomery, G. E. (2005). Reconsidering forced-choice item formats for applicant personality assessment. Human Performance, 18, 267–307.Google Scholar

Chun, K.-T., Campbell, J. B., & Yoo, J. H. (1974). Extreme response style in cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5(4), 465–480.Google Scholar

Church, T. A. (2001). Personality measurement in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 979–1006.Google Scholar

Church, A. T. (2009). Prospects for an integrated trait and cultural psychology. European Journal of Personality, 23, 153–182.Google Scholar

Church, A. T. (2010). Measurement issues in cross-cultural research. In Walford, G., Viswanathan, M., & Tucker, E. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of measurement (pp. 151–157). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Church, T. A., & Burke, P. J. (1994). Exploratory and confirmatory tests of the big five and Tellegen’s three- and four-dimensional models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 93–114.Google Scholar

Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., Ching, C. M., and 16 others. (2013). Within-individual variability in self-concepts and personality states: Applying density distribution and situation-behavior approaches across cultures. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 922–935.Google Scholar

Clarke, I. (2000). Extreme response style in cross-cultural research: An empirical investigation. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15, 137–152.Google Scholar

Clauser, B. E., & Mazor, K. M. (1998). Using statistical procedures to identify differentially functioning test items. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17, 31–44.Google Scholar

Cleary, A. T., & Hilton, T. L. (1968). An investigation of item bias. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28, 61–75.Google Scholar

Cliff, N. (1966). Orthogonal rotation to congruence. Psychometrika, 31, 33–42.Google Scholar

Coates, N. (2003). Teenyboppers, groupies, and other grotesques: Girls and women and rock culture in the 1960s and early 1970s. Journal of Popular Music Studies, 15(1), 65–94.Google Scholar

Coe, C. K. (1992). The MBTI: Potential uses and misuses in personnel administration. Public Personnel Management, 21(4), 511–522.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Coleman, M., & Liau, T. L. (1975). A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 283–284.Google Scholar

Coleman, M., & Liau, T. L. (1975). A computer readability formula designed for machine scoring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 283–284.Google Scholar

Colome, A. (2001). Lexical activation in bilinguals’ speech production: Language-specific or language independent? Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 721–736.Google Scholar

Conners, C. K. (2008). Conners 3rd edition: Manual. Toronto, ON: MHS.Google Scholar

Conway, J. M., & Huffcut, A. I. (2003). A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6, 147–168.Google Scholar

Cook, J. (1978) Cultural relativism as an ethnocentric notion. In Beehler, R. & Drengoson, A. R. (Eds.). The philosophy of society (pp. 289–315). London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Corulla, W. J. (1990). A revised version of the psychoticism scale for children. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 65–76.Google Scholar

Corwyn, R. F., & Bradley, R. H. (2005). The cross-gender equivalence of strains and gains from occupying multiple roles among dual-earner couples. Parenting: Science and Practice, 5(1), 1–27.Google Scholar

Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). Lexical selection in bilinguals: Do words in the bilingual’s two lexicons compete for selection? Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 365–397.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10, 1–9.Google Scholar

Cox, T. (1993). Cultural diversity in organizations: Theory, research and practice. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar

Crites, J. O., Bechtoldt, H. P., Goodstein, L. D., & Heilbrun, A. B. Jr. (1961). A factor analysis of the California Psychological Inventory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 45, 408–414.Google Scholar

Cronbach, L. J. (1946). Response sets and test validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 6(4), 475–494.Google Scholar

Cropanzano, R. & Wright, T. A. (2003). Procedural justice and organizational staffing: A tale of two paradigms. Human Resource Management Review, 13(1), 7–39.Google Scholar

Cross, T., Bazron, B., Dennis, K., & Isaacs, M. (1989). Towards a culturally competent system of care (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Child Development Center, CASSP Technical Assistance Center.Google Scholar

Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.Google Scholar

Cudeck, R., & MacCallum, R. C. (Eds.) (2007). Factor analysis at 100: Historical developments and future directions. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar

Cull, A., Sprangers, M., Bjordal, K., Aaronson, N., West, K., & Bottomley, A. (2002). EORTC quality of life group translation procedure (2nd ed.). Retrieved on August 28, 2016 from www.ipenproject.org/documents/methods_docs/Surveys/EORTC_translation.pdf.Google Scholar

Currie, C., Nic, G. S., Godeau, E., Roberts, C., Smith, R., Currie, D., Pickett, W., Richter, M., Morgan, A. & Barnekow, V. (Eds.) (2008). Inequalities in young people’s health: HBSC international report from the 2005/06 Survey. Health Policy for Children and Adolescents. 5. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar

Cyscowicz, Y. M., Friedman, D., Rothstein, M., & Snodgrass, J. G. (1997). Picture naming by young children: Norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 171–237.Google Scholar

Dale, E., & Chall, J. (1948). A formula for predicting readability. Educational Research Bulletin, 27, 11–28.Google Scholar

Davison, M. L. (1985). Multidimensional scaling versus components analysis of test intercorrelations. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 94-105.Google Scholar

Dazzi, C. (2011). The Eysenck personality questionnaire – Revised (EPQ-R): A confirmation of the factorial structure in the Italian context. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(6), 790–794.Google Scholar

De Beuckelaer, A., Lievens, F., & Swinnen, G. (2007). Measurement equivalence in the conduct of a global organizational survey across countries in six cultural regions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 575–600.Google Scholar

De Girolamo, G. & McFarlane, A. C. (1996). The epidemiology of PTSD: A comprehensive review of the literature. In Marsella, A. J., Friedman, M. J. & Gerrity, E. T. (Eds.). Ethnocultural aspects of PTSD: Issues research and clinical applications. (pp. 33–86). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar

De Raad, B., Di Blas, L., & Perugini, M. (1998). Two independently constructed Italian trait taxonomies: Comparisons with Italian and between Italian and Germanic languages. European Journal of Personality, 12, 19–41.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., Pattie, A., & Starr, J. M. (2013). The stability of intelligence from age 11 to age 90 years: The Lothian birth cohort of 1921. Psychological Science, 12, 2361–2368.Google Scholar

DeDonno, M. A., Rivera-Torres, K., Monis, A., & Fagan, J. F. (2014). The Influence of a time limit and bilingualism on scholastic assessment test performance. North American Journal of Psychology, 16(2), 211–224.Google Scholar

De Jong, J. T. V. M., Komproe, I. H., Spinazzola, J., Van der Kolk, B. A., & Van Ommeren, M. H. (2005). DESNOS in three postconflict settings: Assessing cross-cultural construct equivalence. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 18(1), 13–21.Google Scholar

DeMaio, T., & Landreth, L. (2004). Do different cognitive interview techniques produce different results. In Presser, S., Rothgeb, J., Couper, M., Lessler, J., Martin, E., Martin, J. & Singer, E. (Eds.), Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires (pp. 89–108). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Demo, D. H., Allen, K. R. & Fine, M. A. (Eds.) (2000). Handbook of family diversity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Deregowski, J. B., & Serpell, R. (1971). Performance on a sorting task: A cross-cultural experiment. International Journal of Psychology, 6, 273–281.Google Scholar

Dodeen, H. (2004). Stability of differential item functioning over a single population in survey data. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72(3), 181–193.Google Scholar

Doi, T. (1973). The anatomy of dependence. Tokyo: Kodansha.Google Scholar

Dorans, N. J., & Holland, P. W. (1993). DIF detection and description: Mantel-Haenszel and standardization. In Holland, P. W. & Wainer, H. (Eds.), Differential Item Functioning (pp. 35–66). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Dorans, N. J., & Kulick, E. (1986). Demonstrating the utility of the standardization approach to assessing unexpected differential item performance on the scholastic aptitude test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 23, 355–368.Google Scholar

Doty, R. L., Marcus, A., & Lee, W. (1996). Development of the 12-Item Cross-Cultural Smell Identification Test (CC-SIT). The Laryngoscope, 106(3), 353–356.Google Scholar

Du, Y., & Yates, F. (1995). When to adjust for Differential Item Functioning. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 9(1), 414.Google Scholar

DuBay, W. H. (2006). Smart language: Readers, readability, and the grading of text. Costa Mesa: Impact Information.Google Scholar

Dundes, A. (1962). From etic to emic units in the structural study of folktales. Journal of American Folklore, 75, 95-105.Google Scholar

Educational Testing Service (ETS) (2015). The ETS Standards for Quality and Fairness. Princeton: ETS. Retrieved on August 17, 2016 from www.ets.org.Google Scholar

Eklöf, H. (2007). Test-taking motivation and mathematics performance in TIMSS 2003. International Journal of Testing, 7(3), 311–326.Google Scholar

Eklöf, H. (2010). Skill and will: Test-taking motivation and assessment quality. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(4), 345–356.Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1984). Expression and the nature of emotion. In Scherer, K. R. E. (Ed.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 319–343). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Ellis, B. B.(1989). Differential item functioning: Implications for test translations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 912–921.Google Scholar

Elosua, P., & Iliescu, D. (2012). Tests in Europe: Where we are and where we should go. International Journal of Testing, 12, 157–175.Google Scholar

Embretson, S. E. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 179–197.Google Scholar

Enriquez, V. G. (1994). From colonial to liberation psychology: The Philippine experience. Manila: De La Salle University Press.Google Scholar

Ercikan, K., & Solano-Flores, G. (2014). Introduction to the special issue: Levels of analysis in the assessment of linguistic minority students. Applied Measurement in Education, 24(4), 233–235.Google Scholar

Ercikan, K., Simon, M., & Oliveri, M. E. (2013). Score comparability of multiple language versions of assessments within jurisdictions. In Simon, M., Ercikan, K. & Rousseau, M. (Eds.), Improving large-scale assessment in education: Theory, issues and practice (pp. 110–124). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Esposito, J. L., & Rothgeb, J. M. (1997). Evaluating survey data: Making the transition from pretesting to quality assessment. In Lyberg, L., Biemer, P., Collins, M., de Leeuw, E., Dippo, C., Schwarz, N. & Trewin, D. (Eds.), Survey measurement and process quality (pp. 541–571). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

European Federation of Psychologists’ Associations (EFPA) (2013). EFPA review model for the description and evaluation of psychological and educational tests: Test review form and notes for reviewers, Version 4.2.6. Retrieved on February 12, 2016 from www.efpa.org.Google Scholar

European Federation of Psychologists’ Associations (EFPA) Board of Assessment (2013). EFPA review model for the description and evaluation of psychological and educational tests: Test review form and notes for reviewers. Bruxelles: EFPA.Google Scholar

Everitt, B. S. (2002). The Cambridge dictionary of Statistics (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Evers, A., Muñiz, J., Bartram, D., Boben, D., Egeland, J., Fernandez-Hermida, J. R., Frans, Ö., Gintiliené, G., Hagemeister, C., Halama, P., Iliescu, D., Jaworowska, A., Jiménez, P., Manthouli, M., Matesic, K., Schittekatte, M., Sümer, H. C., & Urbánek, T. (2012). Testing practices in the 21st century: Developments and European psychologists’ opinions. European Psychologist, 17(4), 300–319.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. (1952). The scientific study of personality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. (1959). Manual of the Maudsley Personality Inventory. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1964). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. (1975). Manual: Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (Junior and Adult). San Diego: EdITS.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1991). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Scales (EPS Adult). London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J., Eysenck, S. B. G., Pitariu, H., Iliescu, D., & Băban, A. (2008). The Eysenck Adult Personality Scales: Technical and interpretative manual. Cluj-Napoca: Odiseea.Google Scholar

Eze, M. O. (2008). What is African Communitarianism? Against consensus as a regulative Ideal. South African Journal of Philosophy, 27(4), 386–399.Google Scholar

Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factorial analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.Google Scholar

Fahrenberg, J., & Selg, H. (1970). Das Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventar. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar

Fahrenberg, J., Hampel, R., & Selg, H. (2010). Das Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventar FPI-R (8th ed.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar

Fahrenberg, J., Hampel, R., Selg, H., Pitariu, H. P., & Iliescu, D. (2007). Inventarul de Personalitate Freiburger (FPI, Freiburger Personlichkeitsinventar): Manual tehnic și interpretativ [FPI Test Manual]. Cluj-Napoca: Odiseea.Google Scholar

Fan, W., Cheung, F. M., Zhang, J. X., & Cheung, S. F. (2011). Combined emic-etic approach to personality: CPAI and cross-cultural applications. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43(12), 1418–1429.Google Scholar

Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861–874.Google Scholar

Fernandez, A. L., & Marcopulos, B. A. (2008). A comparison of normative data for the Trail Making Test from several countries: Equivalence of norms and considerations for interpretation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 239–246.Google Scholar

First, M. B., Williams, J. B. W., Karg, R. S., & Spitzer, R. L. (2015). Structured clinical interview for DSM-5 disorders, clinician version (SCID-5-CV). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar

Fischer, G. H. (1993). Notes on the Mantel-Haenszel procedure and another chi-squared test for the assessment of DIF. Methodika, 7, 88-100.Google Scholar

Fischer, G. H. (1997). Unidimensional Linear Logistic Rasch Models. In van der Linden, W. J. & Hambleton, R. K. (Eds.), Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory (pp. 225–244). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Fischer, M. (2007). Are correlations constant over time? Application of the CC-TRIGT-Test to return series from different asset classes. SFB 649 Discussion Paper 2007-012. Berlin: Humboldt University.Google Scholar

Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221–233.Google Scholar

Flesch, R. (2016). How to Write Plain English. Retrieved on July 26, 2016 from www.mang.canterbury.ac.nz/writing_guide/writing/flesch.shtml.Google Scholar

Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286–299.Google Scholar

Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.Google Scholar

Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., White, T., & Messer, M. A. (2010). Mini-Mental State Examination, Second Edition: User’s Manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., White, T., Messer, M. A., Munteanu, C., Iliescu, D., & Livinti, R. (2013). Mini-Mental State Examination, Second Edition: User’s Manual (Romanian adaptation). Bucharest: OS Romania.Google Scholar

Forehand, R., & Kotchick, B. A. (1996). Cultural diversity: A wake-up call for parent training. Behavior Therapy, 27(2), 187–206.Google Scholar

Forsyth, B., Levin, K., & Fisher, S. (1999). Test of an appraisal method for establishment survey questionnaires. Proceedings of the ASA Section on Survey Research Methods. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, 145–149. Retrieved on June 19, 2016 from www.amstat.org/sections/srms/proceedings/papers.Google Scholar

Fox, S., Spector, P. E., Goh, A., Bruursema, K., & Kessler, S. R. (2012). The deviant citizen: Measuring potential positive relations between counterproductive work behaviour and organizational citizenship behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 199–220.Google Scholar

Frankenburg, W. K., & Dodds, J. B. (1996). Denver II technical manual. Denver, CO: Denver Developmental Materials.Google Scholar

Furnham, A., Guenole, N., Levine, S. J., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T., (2013). The NEO-PI-R: Factor structure and gender invariance from exploratory structural equation modeling analyses in a high-stakes setting. Assessment, 20(1), 14–23.Google Scholar

Gabrenya, W. K. Jr., & Hwang, K. K. (1996). Chinese social interaction: Harmony and hierarchy on the good earth. In Bond, M. H. (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 309–321). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gade, C. B. N. (2012). What is Ubuntu? Different interpretations among South Africans of African descent. South African Journal of Philosophy, 31(3), 484–503.Google Scholar

Garrido, M. V., Lopes, D., Prada, M., Rodrigues, D., Jeronimo, R., & Mourao, R. P. (2016, July). What’s in a face: Norms for static vs. dynamic emotional expressions. Presented at the 31st International Congress of Psychology, Yokohama, Japan.Google Scholar

Gati, I. (1979). A hierarchical model for the structure of vocational interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 15, 90-106.Google Scholar

Gati, I. (1982). Testing models for the structure of vocational interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21, 164–182.Google Scholar

Gati, I. (1991). The structure of vocational interests. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 309–332.Google Scholar

Geertz, C. (1984). Anti-anti-relativism. American Anthropologist, 86(2), 263–278.Google Scholar

Geisinger, K. F., Spies, R. A., Carlson, J. F., & Plake, B. S. (Eds.) (2007). The seventeenth mental measurement yearbook. Lincoln, NE: The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.Google Scholar

Gendre, F. (1966). Evaluation de la personnalite et situation de selection. Bulletin d’Etudes et Recherches Psychologiques, 15, 259–261.Google Scholar

Georgas, J., Berry, J. W., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Kagitcibasi, C., & Poortinga, Y. H. (Eds.). (2006). Families across cultures: A 30-nation psychological study. New York, NY: Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ger, G. (1990). Measuring and comparing materialism cross-culturally. In Goldberg, M. E., Gorn, G., & Pollay, R. W. (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Volume 17) (pp. 186–192). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar

Gerber, E. (1999). The view from anthropology: Ethnography and the cognitive interview. In Sirken, M., Hermann, D., Schechter, S., Schwarz, N., Tanur, J. & Tourangeau, R. (Eds.), Cognition and Survey Research (pp. 217–234). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Gierl, M., Jodoin, M. G., & Ackerman, T. A. (2000). Performance of Mantel-Haenszel, Simultaneous Item Bias Test, and logistic regression when the proportion of DIF items is large. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (New Orleans, Louisiana, April 2000).Google Scholar

Gleason, T. C. (1976). On redundancy in canonical analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1004–1006.Google Scholar

Gnys, J. A., & Willis, W. G. (1991). Validation of executive function tasks with young children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 7, 487–501.Google Scholar

Goetzmann, W. N., Li, L., & Rouwenhorst, K. G. (2005). Long-term global market correlations. Journal of Business, 78(1), 1–38.Google Scholar

Goldstein, S., & Naglieri, J. A. (2010). Autism spectrum rating scales: Technical manual. Toronto, ON: MHS.Google Scholar

Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1983). The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. Boston: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar

Goodnow, J. J. (2002). Parents’ knowledge and expectations: Using what we know. In Bornstein, M. H. (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Vol. 3. Being and becoming a parent (pp. 439–460). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Görlich, Y., & Schuler, H. (2010). Arbeitsprobe zur berufsbezogenen Intelligenz. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar

Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd. ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). The theory of continuous norming. In Gorsuch, R. L. (chair), Continuous norming: An alternative to tabled norms? Symposium presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Anaheim, California.Google Scholar

Gottfredson, L. (1998). The General Intelligence Factor. Scientific American Presents, 9(4), 24–29.Google Scholar

Gough, H. G. (1957). Manual for the California Psychological Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar

Gough, H. G. (1987). California Psychological Inventory administrator’s guide (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar

Gough, H. G., & Brad ley, P. (1996a). California Psychological Inventory manual (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar

Gough, H. G., & Bradley, P. (1996b). Theory and origins of a 3-vector model of personality structure. Paper presented at the Annual APA Convention, Toronto, Ontario, 13 August.Google Scholar

Gough, H. G., & Bradley, P. (2005). California Psychological Inventory CPI260 manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar

Gough, H. G., & Heilbrun, A. B. (1983). The Adjective Check List manual (1983 ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar

Gough, H., Pitariu, H., Iliescu, D., Tureanu, V., & Peleașă, C. (2006). Inventarul Psihologic California: Monografie [A CPI monography]. București: PsihoCover.Google Scholar

Gower, J. C. (1971). A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics, 27(4), 857–871.Google Scholar

Grayson, D. A., Mackinnon, A., Jorm, A. F., Creasey, H., & Broe, G. A. (2000). Item bias in the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: Effects of physical disorders and disability in an elderly community sample. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55(5), 273–282.Google Scholar

Green, B. F., Crone, C. R., & Folk, V. G. (1989). A method for studying differential distractor functioning. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26(2), 147–160.Google Scholar

Green, J. A. (1992). Testing whether correlation matrices are different from each other. Developmental Psychology, 28(2), 215–224.Google Scholar

Greene, J., & Serro, L. C. (2015). Encouraging critical thinking and professional reading with literacy bags. The Open Communication Journal, 9(1), 65–71.Google Scholar

Greenfield, K. F. (1997a). Culture as a process: Empirical methods for cultural psychology. In Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H. & Pandey, J. (Eds.). Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (2nd ed.) (pp. 301–346). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Gregoire, J., & Hambleton, R. K. (2015, July). Present and future of the ITC guidelines on test adaptation. Presented at the 14th European Congress of Psychology, Milan, Italy.Google Scholar

Grégoire, J., & Hambleton, R. K. (Eds.). (2009). Advances in test adaptation research [Special Issue]. International Journal of Testing, 9(2), 73-166.Google Scholar

Gregoire, J., de Laval, N., Mesters, P., & Czarka, M. (1994). Validation of the Quality of Life in Depression Scale in population of adult depressive patients aged 60 and above. Quality of Life Research, 3(1), 13–19.Google Scholar

Griffin, P., & Care, E. (Eds.). (2015). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Grimm, S. D., & Church, A. T. (1999). A cross-cultural study of response biases in personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 415–441.Google Scholar

Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 1417–1432.Google Scholar

Gurr, T. & Harff, B. (1994). Ethnic conflict in world politics (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Gurven, M., von Rueden, C., Massenkoff, M., Kaplan, H., & Vie, M. L. (2012). How universal Is the Big Five? Testing the five-factor model of personality variation among forager-farmers in the Bolivian Amazon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 354–370.Google Scholar

Habel, U., Guru, R. C., Mandal, M. K., Salloum, J. B., Gur, R. E., & Schneider, F. (2000). Emotional processing in schizophrenia across cultures: Standardized measures of discrimination and experience. Schizophrenia Research, 42, 57–66.Google Scholar

Hambleton, R. K. (1994). Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests: A progress report. European Journal of Psychological Assessment (Bulletin of the International Test Commission), 10, 229–244.Google Scholar

Hambleton, R. K. (2001). The next generation of the ITC Test Translation and Adaptation Guidelines. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, Vol 17(3), 2001, 164–172.Google Scholar

Hambleton, R. K. (2002). Adapting achievement tests into multiple languages for international assessments. In Porter, A. C. & Gamoran, A. (Eds.), Methodological advances in cross-national surveys of educational achievement (pp. 58–76). Washington: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar

Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Issues, designs and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F. & Spielberger, C. D. (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 3–38). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1999). Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be avoided and guidelines for improving test adaptation practices. Applied Testing Technology, 1(1), 1–16.Google Scholar

Hambleton, R. K., & Traub, R. E. (1974). The effects of item order on test performance and stress. The Journal of Experimental Education, 43(1), 40–46.Google Scholar

Hambleton, R. K., & Zenisky, A. L. (2011). Translating and adapting tests for cross-cultural assessments. In Matsumoto, D. & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (Eds.). Cross-Cultural Research Methods in Psychology (pp. 46–74). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F., & Spielberger, C. D. (Eds.) (2005). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Hambleton, R. K., Yu, J., & Slater, S. C. (1999). Field-test of the ITC guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15(3), 270–276.Google Scholar

Hamilton, M. (1960) A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 23, 56–62.Google Scholar

Harkness, J. (2003). Questionnaire translation. In Harkness, J., Van de Vijver, F. J. R. & Moher, P. (Eds.), Cross-cultural survey methods (pp. 35–56). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Harkness, J., Pennell, B. E., & Schoua-Glusberg, A. (2004). Survey questionnaire translation and assessment. In Presser, S., Rothgeb, J., Couper, M., Lessler, J., Martin, E., Martin, J. & Singer, E. (Eds.), Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires (pp. 453–473). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Harkness, J., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Mohler, P. Ph. (Eds.) (2003). Cross-cultural survey methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Harrison, P. L., & Oakland, T. (2008). Adaptive Behavior Assessment System, second edition: Manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar

Hartsuiker, R. J., Kolk, H. H. J., & Huiskamp, P. (1999). Priming word order in sentence production. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 129–147.Google Scholar

Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J., & Veltkamp, E. (2004). Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish-English bilinguals. Psychological Science, 16(6), 409–414.Google Scholar

Harzing, A. W. (2006). Response styles in cross-national survey research: A 26-country Study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6(2), 243–266.Google Scholar

Hattie, J. (1985). Methodology review: Assessing unidimensionality of tests and items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(2), 139–164.Google Scholar

Haven, S., & ten Berge, J. M. F. (1977). Tucker’s coefficient of congruence as a measure of factorial invariance: An empirical study. Heymans Bulletin 290 EX, unpublished report by the Department of Psychology, University of Groningen.Google Scholar

He, J., & van de Vijver, F. (2012). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural research. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(2).Google Scholar

He, J., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2013). A general response style factor: Evidence from a multi-ethnic study in the Netherlands. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 794–800.Google Scholar

He, J., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2015a). Effects of a General Response Style on cross-cultural comparisons: Evidence from the Teaching and Learning International Survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79, 267–290.Google Scholar

He, J., Espinosa, A., Poortinga, Y. H., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2014). Acquiescent and socially desirable response styles in cross-cultural value surveys. In Jackson, L. T. B., Meiring, D., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Idemudia, E. & Gabrenya, W. K. Jr (Eds.), Toward sustainable development through nurturing diversity (pp. 98-111). Melbourne, FL: International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology.Google Scholar

He, J., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Espinosa, A. D., Abubakar, A., Dimitrova, R., Adams, B. G., Aydinli, A., Atitsogbe, K., Alonso-Arbiol, I., Bobowik, M., Fischer, R., Jordanov, V., Mastrotheodoros, S., Neto, F., Ponizovsky, Y. J., Reb, J., Sim, S., Sovet, L., Stefenel, D., Suryani1, A. O., Tair, E., & Villieux, A. (2014). Socially desirable responding: Enhancement and denial in 20 countries. Cross-Cultural Research, 49(3), 227–249.Google Scholar

Heaton, R. K., Chelune, G. J., Talley, J. L., Kay, G. G., & Curtiss, G. (1993). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, revised and expanded: Manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Heaton, R. K., Chelune, G. J., Talley, J. L., Kay, G. G., Curtiss, G., Avram, E., Ciurea, A. V., Iliescu, D., & Tașcu, A. (2010). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: Manual for the Romanian form. Bucharest: OS Romania.Google Scholar

Hedman, A. S. (2008). Using the SMOG formula to revise a health-related document. American Journal of Health Education. 39(1), 61–64.Google Scholar

Hedrih, V. (2008). Structure of vocational interests in Serbia: Evaluation of the spherical model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 13–23.Google Scholar

Heggestad, E. D., Morrison, M., Reeve, C. L., & McCloy, R. A. (2006). Forced-choice assessments of personality for selection: Evaluating issues of normative assessment and faking resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 9–24.Google Scholar

Hein, S., Reich, J., & Grigorenko, E. (2015). Cultural manifestation of intelligence in formal and informal learning environments during childhood. In Jansen, L. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human development and culture: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 214–229). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1995). Social desirability among Canadian and Japanese students, Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 777–779.Google Scholar

Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Peng, K., & Greenholtz, J. (2002). What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 903–918.Google Scholar

Hendriks, A. A. J., Hofstee, W. K. B., & De Raad, B. (1999). The Five-Factor Inventory (FFPI). Personality & Individual Differences, 27,307–325.Google Scholar

Hendriks, A. A. J., Perugini, M., Angleitner, A., Ostendorf, F., Johnson, J. A., De Fruyt, F., Hrebickova, M., Kreitler, S., Murakami, T., Bratko, D., Conner, M., Nagy, J., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., & Ruisel, I. (2003). The Five-Factor Personality Inventory: Cross-cultural generalizability across 13 countries. European Journal of Personality, 17, 347–373.Google Scholar

Ho, D. Y. F. (1996). Filial piety and its psychological consequences. In Bond, M. H. (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 155–165). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, E. (1990). Nations and nationalism since 1780: Programme, myth, reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hofer, J., Chasiotis, A., Friedlmeier, W., Busch, H., & Campos, D. (2005). The measurement of implicit motives in three cultures: Power and affiliation in Cameroon, Costa Rica, and Germany. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 689–716.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. (2001) Culture’s consequences, comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Hogan, J., Barrett, P., & Hogan, R. (2007). Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1270–1285.Google Scholar

Holden, R. B. (2010). Face validity. In Weiner, I. B. & Craighead, W. E. (Eds.). The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology (4th ed.) (pp. 637–638). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Holland, J. L. (1992). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Holland, J. L., Fritsche, B. A., & Powell, A. B. (1994). Self-directed search: Technical manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Holland, P. W. (2010). A framework and history for score linking. In Dorans, N. J., Pommerich, M. & Holland, P. W. (Eds.), Linking and Aligning Scores and Scales (pp. 5-30). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Holland, P. W., & Thayer, D. T. (1988). Differential Item performance and the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. In Wainer, H. and Brown, H. I. (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 129–145). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Hook, J. N., Davis, D. E., Owen, J., Worthington, E. L., & Utsey, S. O. (2013). Cultural humility: Measuring openness to culturally diverse clients. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(3), 353–366.Google Scholar

Horn, J. L., & Blankson, N. (2005) Foundations for better understanding of cognitive abilities. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 41–68). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide in measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117–144.Google Scholar

Horn, J. L., McArdle, J. J., & Mason, R. (1983). When is invariance not invariant: A practical scientist’s look at the ethereal concept of factor invariance. Southern Psychologist, 4, 179–188.Google Scholar

Horn, J. L., Wanberg, K. W., & Appel, M. (1973). On the internal structure of the MMPI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 8, 131–172.Google Scholar

Hough, L. M. (1998). Effects of intentional distortion in personality measurement and evaluation of suggested palliatives. Human Performance, 11 (2/3), 209–244.Google Scholar

House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations, the globe study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Hubbard, R., & Allen, S. J. (1987). A cautionary note on the use of principal component analysis: Supportive empirical evidence. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 301–308.Google Scholar

Hudler, M., & Richter, R. (2002). Cross-national comparison of the quality of life in Europe: Inventory of surveys and methods. Social Indicators Research, 58, 217–228.Google Scholar

Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1985). Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: A review and comparison of strategies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16(2), 131–152.Google Scholar

Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1989). Effects of culture and response format on extreme response style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 296–309.Google Scholar

Hunt, S. M. (1993). Cross-cultural comparability of quality of life measures. Drug Information Journal, 27, 395–400.Google Scholar

Hunt, S. M., McEwen, J., Williams, J., & Papp, E. (1981). The Nottingham Health Profile: Subjective health status and medical consultations. Social Science and Medicine, 15A, 221–229.Google Scholar

Hunter, J. E.. Gerbing, D. W., & Boster, F. J. (1982). Machiavellian beliefs and personality: Construct invalidity of the Machiavellianism dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(6), 1293–1305.Google Scholar

Hurley, J., & Cattell, R. B. (1962). The Procrustes program: Producing direct rotation to test a hypothesized factor structure. Behavioral Science, 7, 258–262.Google Scholar

Ifabuyumi, O. I. (1981). Depressive illness presenting as monosymptomatic hallucination: A case report. African Journal of Psychiatry, 7(1/2), 17–20.Google Scholar

Iliescu, D., & Ion, A. (2009, July). Psychometric Performance of the CPAI-2 as a Big Five Measure in the Romanian Context. Paper presented at the European Congress of Psychology, Oslo.Google Scholar

Iliescu, D., & Ion, A. (2014, July). Psychometric properties of a measure of personality as a function of language literacy and test-taking motivation in an ethnically diverse sample. Paper presented at the 9th Conference of the International Test Commission, San Sebastian, Spain.Google Scholar

Iliescu, D., & Ispas, D. (2016). Personality assessment. In Leong, F. T. L., Bartram, D., Cheung, F. M., Geisinger, K. F. & Iliescu, D. (2016). The ITC international handbook of testing and assessment (pp. 134–146). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Iliescu, D., Ilie, A., & Ispas, D. (2011). Examining the criterion-related validity of the employee screening questionnaire: A three-sample investigation. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19(2), 222–228.Google Scholar

Iliescu., D., Ispas, D., & Ilie, A. (2013, July). Personality, wellbeing and quality of life. A comparison between Chinese working in Romania and Romanians, based on an emic-etic measure of personality. Paper presented at the 13th European Congress of Psychology, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar

Iliescu, D., Livinți, R., & Pitariu, H. (2010). Adaptarea Job Stress Survey (JSS) în România: Implicații privind manifestări ale stresului ocupațional în România. Psihologia Resurselor Umane, 8 (1), 27–38.Google Scholar

Iliescu, D., Ilie, A., Ispas, D., & Ion, A. (2012). Emotional intelligence in personnel selection: Applicant reactions, criterion and incremental validity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20(3), 347–358.Google Scholar

Iliescu, D., Ilie, A., Ispas, D., & Ion, A. (2013). Examining the psychometric properties of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test: Findings from an Eastern European Culture. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 121–128.Google Scholar

Iliescu, D., Ispas, D., Ilie, A. & Ion, A. (2012, July). Incremental validity of CPAI-2 for Romanian and Chinese workers in Romania. Presented at the 8th Conference of the International Test Commission, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Iliescu, D., Ispas, D., Ilie, A., & Ion, A. (2013). The structure of vocational interests in Romania. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60, 294–302.Google Scholar

Institute of International Education (IIE) (2014). Charting new pathways to higher education: International secondary students in the United States. New York: Institute of International Education.Google Scholar

Institute of International Education (IIE) (2014). Open doors 2015 report on international educational exchange. New York: Institute of International Education.Google Scholar

International Test Commission (2005). International Guidelines on Test Adaptation. [www.intestcom.org]Google Scholar

International Test Commission (2014). The ITC Statement On the Use of Tests and Other Assessment Instruments for Research Purposes. [www.intestcom.org].Google Scholar

International Test Commission (2016). The ITC Guidelines in Support of the Fair and Valid Assessment of Linguistically Diverse Populations (First Official Draft). [www.intestcom.org].Google Scholar

International Test Commission (2017). International Guidelines on Test Adaptation (2nd ed.). [www.intestcom.org].Google Scholar

Ion, A., Iliescu, D., Ilie, A., & Ispas, D. (2016). The emic-etic approach to personality measurement in personnel selection. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 55–60.Google Scholar

Ion, A., Iliescu, D., Ratanadilok, K., Rana, N., Widyanti, A., & Aldhafri, S. (2016). A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Personality Structure through the Lens of the HEXACO Model. Journal of Personality Assessment [accepted].Google Scholar

Isaacs, M., & Benjamin, M. (1991). Towards a culturally competent system of care (Vol. 2): Programs which utilize culturally competent principles. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Child Development Center, CASSP Technical Assistance Center.Google Scholar

Ispas, D., Iliescu, D., Ilie, A., Sulea, C., Askew, K., Rohlfs, J. T., & Whalen, K. (2014). Revisiting the relationship between impression management and job performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 47–53.Google Scholar

Jackson, D. C., Wroblewski, V. R., & Ashton, M. C. (2000). The impact of faking on employment tests: Does forced choice offer a solution? Human Performance, 13(4), 371–388.Google Scholar

Jackson, D. N. (1974). Personality Research Form manual. Goshen, New York: Research Psychologists Press.Google Scholar

Jackson, D. N. (2003). The Multidimensional Aptitude Battery-II: Manual. Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.Google Scholar

Jackson, D. N., Iliescu, D., & Andreescu, M. (2009). Employee Screening Questionnaire-2: Manual Tehnic. Cluj-Napoca: Sinapsis.Google Scholar

Jackson, D. N., Iliescu, D., & Glinta, F. (2008). The Multidimensional Aptitude Battery, Second Edition: Technical and interpretative manual for the Romanian version. Cluj-Napoca: Odiseea.Google Scholar

Jawahar, P. D., & Raghavendra, S. N. (2011). Perceptual difference of role based performance: A gender study. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 1(3), 175–186.Google Scholar

Jennrich, R. I. (1970). An asymptotic chi-square test for the equality of two correlation matrices. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, 904–912.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory, Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.Google Scholar

Johnson, F. A. (1993). Dependency and Japanese socialization: Psychoanalytic and anthropological investigations into Amae. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, T., Kulesa, P., Cho, Y. I., & Shavitt, S. (2005). The relation between culture and response styles: Evidence from 19 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(2), 264–277.Google Scholar

Johnson, T., O’Rourke, D., Chavez, N., Sudman, S., Warnecke, R., Lacey, L., & Horm, J. (1997). Social cognition and responses to survey questions among culturally diverse populations. In Lyberg, L. E., Biemer, P. P., Collins, M., De Leeuw, E. D., Dippo, C., Schwarz, N. & Trewin, D. (Eds.), Survey measurement and process quality (pp. 87–113). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Jones, R. N. (2003). Racial bias in the assessment of cognitive functioning of older adults. Aging and Mental Health, 7(2), 83–102.Google Scholar

Jung, J. M., & Kellaris, J. J. (2004). Cross-national differences in proneness to scarcity effects: The moderating roles of familiarity, uncertainty avoidance, and need for cognitive closure. Psychology & Marketing, 21(9), 739–753.Google Scholar

Kagitcibasi, C. (1996). Family and human development across cultures. A view from the other side. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Kandawasvika, G. Q., Mapingure, P. M., Nhembe, M., & Mtereredzi, R. (2012). Validation of a culturally modified short form of the McCarthy Scales of Children’s Abilities in 6 to 8 year old Zimbabwean school children: A cross section study. BMC Neurology 12(1), 147.Google Scholar

Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar

Karr, S. K., Carvajal, H., & Palmer, B. L. (1992). Comparison of Kaufman’s short form of the McCarthy Scales of Children’s Abilities and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, fourth edition. Percept Mot Skills, 74, (3 Pt 2):1120–1122.Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children: Technical manual (2nd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. M. (1977). Clinical evaluation of young children with the McCarthy Scales, 1st edition. New York: Grune & Straton.Google Scholar

Kawahara, M., Sauter, D., & Tanaka, A. (2016). Development of cultural differences in emotional perception from face and voice. Presented at the 31st International Congress of Psychology, Yokohama, Japan.Google Scholar

Kay, S. R., Opler, L. A., & Fiszbein, A. (2009). Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS): Technical manual. Toronto, ON: MHS.Google Scholar

Keith, T. Z., & Reynolds, M. R. (2010). Cattell-Horn-Carroll abilities and cognitive tests: What we’ve learned from 20 years of research. Psychology in the Schools, 47(7), 635–650.Google Scholar

Kendall, M. G. (1955). Rank correlation methods. New York: Hafner Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Kerlinger, F. N. (1973). Foundations of behavioral research (2nd ed.). London: Holt Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Kessler, R. C., & Ustün, T. B. (2008). The WHO World Mental Health Surveys: Global perspectives on the epidemiology of mental disorders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kessler, R. C., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Alonso, J., Chatterji, S., Lee, S., Ormel, J., Ustün, T. B., & Wang, P. S. (2009). The global burden of mental disorders: An update from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) Surveys. Epidemiologia e psichiatria sociale, 18(1), 23–33.Google Scholar

Kessler, R. C., Barber, C., Beck, A., Berglund, P., Cleary, P. D., McKenas, D., Pronk, N., Simon, G., Stang, P., Ustün, T. U., & Wang, P. (2003). The World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ). Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 45 (2), 156–174.Google Scholar

Kim, U., & Park, Y. S. (2006). The scientific foundation of indigenous and cultural psychology: The transactional approach. In. Kim, U., Yang, K.-S. & Hwang, K.-K. (Eds.). Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Kim, U., Park, Y. S., & Park, D. (1999). The Korean indigenous psychology approach: Theoretical considerations and empirical applications. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48, 451–464.Google Scholar

Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, R. P., Rogers, R. L., & Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy enlisted personnel. Research Branch Report 8-75, Millington, TN: Naval Technical Training, US Naval Air Station, Memphis, TN.Google Scholar

Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical Significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 746–759.Google Scholar

Kirmayer, L. J. (2001). Cultural variations in the clinical Presentation of depression and anxiety: Implications for diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 62, 22–28.Google Scholar

Kirov, G., & Murray, R. M. (1999) Ethnic differences in the presentation of bipolar affective disorder. European Psychiatry, 14, 199–204.Google Scholar

Klare, G. R. (2000). Readable computer documentation. ACM Journal of Computer Documentation. 24(3), 148–168.Google Scholar

Kohs, S. C. (1923). Intelligence measurement: A psychological and statistical study based upon the block-design tests. New York: MacMillan Co.Google Scholar

Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2010). Test equating, scaling and linking. New York: Springer.Google Scholar