Book contents
1 - Introduction: Hobbes After Anarchy
from Part I - Hobbesian Variations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2016
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Before AnarchyHobbes and his Critics in Modern International Thought, pp. 3 - 32Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Armitage, David (2004a). “The Fifty Years’ Rift: Intellectual History and International Relations,” Modern Intellectual History 1, pp. 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, David (2004b). “Is There a Pre-History of Globalization?,” in Cohen, Deborah and O’Connor, Maura (eds.), Comparison and History: Europe in Cross-National Perspective, New York.Google Scholar
Armitage, David (2006). “Hobbes and the Foundations of Modern International Thought,” in Tully, , Brett, , and Hamilton-Bleakly, (eds.), Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Armitage, David (2014). “Critical Exchange: Foundations of Modern International Theory,” Contemporary Political Theory 13, pp. 387–418.Google Scholar
Armitage, David (2015). “Modern International Thought: Problems and Prospects,” History of European Ideas 41, pp. 116–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Duncan (2001). “International Relations: The Dawn of a Historiographical Turn?,” British Journal of Political and International Relations 3, pp. 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Duncan (2007). Victorian Visions of Global Order: Empire and International Relations in Nineteenth-Century Political Thought, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobbitt, Philip (2002). The Shield of Achilles: War, Peace, and the Course of History, New York.Google Scholar
Boucher, David (1998). Political Theories of International Relations: From Thucydides to the Present, Oxford.Google Scholar
Brett, Annabel and Tully, James (eds.) (2006). Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brierly, James Leslie (1928). The Law of Nations: An Introduction to the International Law of Peace, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1977). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1981). “Hobbes and the International Anarchy,” Social Research 41, pp. 717–738.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin (eds.) (1966). Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics, London.Google Scholar
Cavallar, Georg (2002). The Rights of Strangers: Theories of International Hospitality, the Global Community, and Political Justice since Vitoria, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian (1996). “Traditions of Thought and Classical Theories of International Relations,” in Clark, Ian and Neumann, Iver B. (eds.), Classical Theories of International Relations, London.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian (1998). “Beyond the Great Divide: Globalization and the Theory of International Relations,” Review of International Studies 24, pp. 479–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (2011). The Beast and the Sovereign, vol. II, ed. Lisse, Michel, Mallet, Marie-Louise, and Michaud, Ginette, Chicago.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Edwin DeWitt (1917). “The Analogy between Natural Persons and International Persons in the Law of Nations,” The Yale Law Journal 26, pp. 564–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, Edwin DeWitt (1920). The Equality of States in International Law, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Michael (1997). Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism, London.Google Scholar
Dunn, John (1968). “The Identity of the History of Ideas,” Philosophy 43, pp. 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunne, Tim (1998) Inventing International Society: A History of the English School, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, David (1951). “The Decline of Modern Political Theory,” The Journal of Politics 13, pp. 36–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flathman, Richard (1993). Thomas Hobbes: Skepticism, Individuality, and Chastened Politics, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Forrester, Katrina (2014). “Citizenship, War, and the Origins of International Ethics in American Political Philosophy, 1960–1975,” The Historical Journal 57, pp. 773–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel (2003). Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collége de France, 1975–1976, New York.Google Scholar
Gallie, W.B. (1978). Philosophers of Peace and War: Clausewitz, Marx, Engels, and Tolstoy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, James W. (1925). “Limitations of National Sovereignty in International Relations,” American Political Science Review 19, pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, David (1969). The Logic of Leviathan: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gunnell, John G. (1993). The Descent of Political Theory: A Genealogy of an American Vocation, Chicago.Google Scholar
Haslam, Jonathan (2002). No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations since Machiavelli, Yale.Google Scholar
Hinsley, F.H. (1962). Power and the Pursuit of Peace: Theory and Practice in the History of Relations between States, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobden, Stephen (2002). “Historical Sociology: Back to the Future of International Relations?,” in Hobden, Stephen and Hobson, John (eds.), Historical Sociology of International Relations, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian (2008). After Anarchy: Legitimacy and Power in the United Nations Security Council, Princeton.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Renee (2005). “Tradition as Invention: The ‘Traditions Tradition’ and the History of Ideas in International Relations,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 34, pp. 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Laurie M. (1993). Thucydides, Hobbes, and the Interpretation of Realism, DeKalb.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward (2002). Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerry, John (2013). Remarks at the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, February 20, 2013.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen (1982). “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables,” International Organization 36, pp. 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. (2001). “Beyond Anarchy: The Importance of Security Institutions,” International Security 26, pp. 129–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, Richard (1991). “International Relations and the Methodological Turn,” Political Studies 39, pp. 462–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardin, Terry and Mapel, David R. (eds.) (1992). Traditions of International Ethics, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navari, Cornelia (1996). “Hobbes, the State of Nature and the Laws of Nature,” in Clark, Ian and Neumann, Iver B. (eds.), Classical Theories of International Relations, New York.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas (1989). World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations, Columbia, SC.Google Scholar
Pocock, J.G.A. (1962). “The History of Political Thought: A Methodological Inquiry,” in Laslett, P. and Runciman, W.G. (eds.), Philosophy, Politics and Society, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rengger, Nicholas (1999). International Relations, Political Theory and the Problem of Order: Beyond International Relations Theory, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rengger, Nicholas (2000). “Political Theory and International Relations: Promised Land or Exit from Eden,” International Affairs 76, pp. 755–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1915). Political Writings, vol. ii, ed. Vaughan, C.E, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Brian C. (1998). The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations, State University of New York, Albany.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Brian C. (2000) “Resurrecting International Political Theory,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 29, pp. 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Brian C. (2002) “Together Again: Reuniting Political Theory and International Relations Theory,” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 4, pp. 115–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Carl (1976). The Concept of the Political, trans. Schwab, George, New Brunswick.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (1969). “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas,” History and Theory 8, pp. 3–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael Joseph (1986). Realist Thought from Weber to Kissinger, Baton Rouge, LA.Google Scholar
Smith, Steve (1992). “The Forty Years Detour: The Resurgence of Normative Theory in International Relations,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 21, pp. 489–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Steve (1995). “The Self-Images of a Discipline: A Genealogy of International Relations Theory,” in Smith, Steve and Booth, Ken (eds.), International Relations Theory Today, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Teschke, Benno (2003). The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics, and the Making of Modern International Relations, London.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1978). Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1999). The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant, Oxford.Google Scholar
Vigezzi, Bruno (2005). The British Committee for the Theory of International Politics, 1954–1985: The Rediscovery of History, Milan.Google Scholar
Vincent, John R. (1981). “The Hobbesian Tradition in Twentieth Century International Thought,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 10, pp. 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R.B.J. (1987). “Realism Change, and International Political Theory,” International Studies Quarterly 31, pp. 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warrender, Howard (1961). The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: His Theory of Obligation, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin (1966). “Why Is There No International Theory?,” in Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin (eds.), Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics, London.Google Scholar
Williams, Howard (1996). International Relations and the Limits of Political Theory, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael C. (1996). “Hobbes and International Relations: A Reconsideration,” International Organization 50, pp. 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willoughby, Westel Woodbury (1896). An Examination of the Nature of the State, London.Google Scholar
Willoughby, Westel Woodbury (1918). “The Juristic Conception of the State,” American Political Science Review 12, pp. 192–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfers, Arnold (1962). Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics, Baltimore. Originally published as the Introduction to his The Anglo-American Tradition in Foreign Affairs (1956), New Haven, CT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar