Part II - Ideas and challenges
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2016
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Expanding the Horizon of Electroacoustic Music Analysis , pp. 29 - 120Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
References
Brandt, P. A. 2004. Spaces, Domains, and Meaning: Essays in Cognitive Semiotics. Vol. 4: European Semiotics: Language, Cognition, and Culture. Bern: Peter Long.Google Scholar
Brandt, P. A. 2006. Form and meaning in art. In Turner, M. (ed.), The Artful Mind: Cognitive Science and the Riddle of Human Creativity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, E. F. 2005. Ways of Listening: An Ecological Approach to the Perception of Musical Meaning. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, M. 2006. Jonathan Harvey’s Mortuos Plango, Vivos Voco. In Simoni, M. (ed.), Analytical Methods of Electroacoustic Music. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dirks, P. L. 2012. An analysis of Jonathan Harvey’s ‘Mortuos Plango, Vivos Voco.’ http://cec.sonus.ca/econtact/9_2/dirks.html (accessed January 3, 2013).Google Scholar
Donald, M. 2001. A Mind So Rare: The Evolution of Human Consciousness. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Donald, M. 2006. Music as communication. In Turner, M. (ed.), The Artful Mind: Cognitive Science and the Riddle of Human Creativity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. 1994. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Harvey, J. 1981. Mortuos Plango, Vivos Voco: A Realization at IRCAM. Computer Music Journal, 5(4), 22–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, J. 1990. Mortuos Plango, Vivos Voco. On Computer Music Currents 5. Wergo CD, WER 2025–2.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. and Lerdahl, F. 1983. A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, G. 2014. The feeling blend: Feeling and emotion in electroacoustic art. Organised Sound, 19(2), 192–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, J. 2002. Karlheinz Stockhausen: Telemusik (1966). In Licata, T. (ed.), Electroacoustic Music: Analytical Perspectives. Westport, CN: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minsky, M. 1975. Frame System Theory. In Johnson-Laird, P. N. and Wason, P. C. (eds.), Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oliveros, P. 2005. Deep Listening: A Composer’s Sound Practice. New York: iUniverse, Inc.Google Scholar
Pöppel, E. 1997. A hierarchical model of temporal perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 56–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pöppel, E. 1998. Mindworks: Time and Conscious Experience. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Rosch, E. 1978. Principles of categorization. In Rosch, E. and Lloyd, B. B. (eds.), Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schank, R. C. and Abelson, R. P. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 1986. Spectromorphology and structuring processes. In Emmerson, S. (ed.), The Language of Electroacoustic Music. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 1997. Spectromorphology: Explaining sound-shapes. Organised Sound, 2(2), 107–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truax, B. 2000. The aesthetics of computer music: A questionable concept reconsidered. Organised Sound, 5(3), 119–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessel, D. 1990. Liner notes for Antony (1977). On Computer Music Currents 10, Wergo CD, WE119.Google Scholar
Wright, R. D. and Ward, L. M. 2008. Orienting of Attention. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
References
Benjamin, W. (2002) The work of art in the age of its technological reproducibility. In Eiland, H. and Jennings, M. W. (eds.) Selected Writings, Volume 3, 1935–1938. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 101–33.Google Scholar
Brown, Earle (1966) Lecture given at the Internationalen Ferienkurse für Neue Musik, Darmstadt, 1965. Music of the Avant-Garde, 1, 49–51. (Originally published in Form in der Neuen Musik, Darmstädter Beiträge zur Neuen Musik, X, Mainz: Schott).Google Scholar
Cousins, John (2007) Doreen. Subsequently incorporated into the audiovisual work Speak Memory (2007), available at http://www.studio174-nz.com/speak-memory.html.Google Scholar
Dack, John (1999) Karlheinz Stockhausen’s Kontakte and Narrativity. eContact 2.2. http://cec.concordia.ca/econtact/SAN/Dack.htm.Google Scholar
Dhomont, Francis (2001) Phonurgie (1998). On Cycle du son. Montréal: Empreintes Digitales, IMED 0158.Google Scholar
Ferrari, Luc (2009) Presque rien no. 2, ainsi continue la nuit dans ma tête multiple (1977). On L’oeuvre électronique. Paris: Ina-GRM, INA_G 6017/26.Google Scholar
Grabócz, Marta (1997) Survival or renewal? Structural imagination in recent electroacoustic and computer music. Organised Sound, 2, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillette, Ray (1999) Homage [sic] à Pollock No. 2 [1991]. On Six Winners. Stockholm: Fylkingen Records, FYCD 1014.Google Scholar
Kendall, Gary S. (2008) What is an event? The EVENT schema, circumstances, metaphor and gist. Proceedings of the 2008 International Computer Music Conference. Belfast. www.garykendall.net/papers/KendallICMC2008.pdf.Google Scholar
Kramer, Jonathan (1978) Moment form in twentieth century music. The Musical Quarterly, 64(2), 177–94.Google Scholar
Kramer, Jonathan (1988) The Time of Music: New Meanings, New Temporalities, New Listening Strategies. New York/London: Schirmer.Google Scholar
Kremer, Gidon and Argerich, Martha (1994) Beethoven Violin Sonata in C minor, op. 32 no. 2. Deutsche Grammophon 453743–2.Google Scholar
McAdams, Stephen (1989) Psychological constraints on form-bearing dimensions in music. Contemporary Music Review, 4, 181–98. http://mediatheque.ircam.fr/articles/textes/McAdams89a/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, S. and Saariaho, K. (1985) Qualities and functions of musical timbre. Proceedings of the 1985 Computer Music Conference, San Francisco: International Computer Music Association, 367–74.Google Scholar
Meyer, Leonard B. (1973) Explaining Music: Essays and Explorations. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murail, Tristan (2005) The revolution of complex sounds. Contemporary Music Review, 24(2), 121–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pressnitzer, D. and McAdams, S. (2000) Acoustics, psychoacoustics and spectral music. Contemporary Music Review, 19(2), 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, Stéphane (1998) Functional and implicative analysis of Ombres Blanches. Journal of New Music Research, 27(1–2), 165–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, Stéphane (2003) L’analyse des musiques électroacoustiques: modèles et propositions. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure (2004) Narrative Across Media: The Languages of Storytelling. Lincoln, NE/London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Saariaho, Kaija (1987) Timbre and harmony: Interpolations of timbral structures. Contemporary Music Review, 2(1), 93–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smalley, Denis (1986) Spectro-morphology and structuring processes. In Emmerson, S. (ed.) The Language of Electroacoustic Music. London: Macmillan, 61–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smalley, Denis (2007) Space-form and the acousmatic image. Organised Sound, 12(1), 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Bob (2000) Music and Memory: An Introduction. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tenney, James (2006) Meta Hodos and Meta Meta Hodos: A Phenomenology of 20th-Century Musical Materials and an Approach to the Study of Form. Lebanon, NH: Frog Peak Music.Google Scholar
Viñao, Alejandro (1994) Chant d’Ailleurs (1991) for soprano and computer. On Hildegard’s Dream. [Paris]: INA-GRM, INA C 1015.Google Scholar
Wishart, Trevor (1994a) Audible Design: A Plain and Easy Introduction to Practical Sound Composition. York: Orpheus The Pantomime.Google Scholar
Wishart, Trevor (1994b) Tongues of Fire. York: Orpheus The Pantomime, CD Maxi-Single, OTP001.Google Scholar
Young, John (2008) Inventing memory: Documentary and imagination in acousmatic music. In Dogantan-Dack, M. (ed.) Recorded Music: Philosophical and Critical Reflections. London: Middlesex University Press, 314–32.Google Scholar
Zanési, Christian (1996) Stop! l’horizon (1983). On Stop! l’horizon. [Paris]: INA-GRM, INA C 2001.Google Scholar
References
Ames, Charles. 1987. Automated composition in retrospect 1956–1986. Leonardo 20(2), 169–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariza, Christopher. 2009. The interrogator as critic: The Turing Test and the evaluation of generative music systems. Computer Music Journal 33(2), 48–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arsenault, Linda Marie. 2000. An introduction to Iannis Xenakis’s stochastic music, four algorithmic analyses. http://hdl.handle.net/1807/13842 (accessed 7 April 2013).Google Scholar
Assayag, Gérard and Bloch, Georges. 2007. Navigating the oracle: A heuristic approach. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. Copenhagen: MPublishing, 405–12.Google Scholar
Biles, John A. 2007. Improvizing with genetic algorithms: GenJam. In Miranda, E. R. and Biles, J. A. (eds.) Evolutionary Computer Music. London: Springer-Verlag, 137–69.Google Scholar
Blackwell, Tim and Young, Michael. 2004. Self-organised music. Organised Sound 9(2), 123–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulley, James and Jones, Daniel. 2011. Variable 4: A dynamical composition for weather systems. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. Huddersfield: MPublishing, 449–55.Google Scholar
Cage, John. 1961. Composition as Process: II. Indeterminacy. In Silence. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, 35–40.Google Scholar
Casey, Michael. 2009. Soundspotting: A new kind of process? In Dean, R. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Computer Music. New York: Oxford University Press, 421–56.Google Scholar
Collins, Nick. 2008. The analysis of generative music programs. Organised Sound 13(3), 237–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colton, Simon and Wiggins, Geraint. 2012. Computational creativity: The final frontier. Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Google Scholar
Dobrian, Christopher and Koopelman, Daniel. 2006. The ‘E’ in NIME: Musical Expression with New Computer Interfaces. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME). Paris, 277–82.Google Scholar
Ebcioglu, Kemal. 1993. Expert system for harmonizing four-part chorales. In Schwanauer, S. M. and Levitt, D. A. (eds.) Machine Models of Music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 385–402.Google Scholar
Eco, U. 1989. The Open Work, trans. Cangogni, Anna. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (original Opera aperta, 1962, rev. 1976).Google Scholar
Essl, Karlheinz. 1995. Lexikon-Sonate: An interactive realtime composition for computer-controlled piano. Proceedings of the II Brazilian Symposium on Computer Music. Canela, RS, Brazil.Google Scholar
Harvey, Jonathan. 1999. The metaphysics of live electronics, Contemporary Music Review 18 (3), 79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiller, Lejaren and Isaacson, Leonard. 1993. Musical composition with a high-speed digital computer. In Schwanauer, S. M. and Levitt, D. A. (eds.) Machine Models of Music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 9–22.Google Scholar
Hsu, William and Sosnick, Marc. 2009. Evaluating interactive music systems: An HCI approach. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME). Paris, 25–8.Google Scholar
Kramer, Gregory (ed.). 1994. Auditory Display: Sonification, Audification, and Auditory Interfaces. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Krefeld, Volker and Waisvisz, Michel. 1990. The hand in the web: An interview with Michel Waisvisz. Computer Music Journal 14(2), 28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, George E. 2000. Too many notes: Computers, complexity and culture in Voyager. Leonardo Music Journal 10, 33–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manaris, Bill et al. 2005. Zipf’s law, music classification, and aesthetics. Computer Music Journal 29(1), 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Andrew. 2006. Philippe Manoury’s Jupiter. In Simoni, M. (ed.) Analytical Methods of Electroacoustic Music. New York: Routledge, 145–86.Google Scholar
Miranda, Eduardo. 2007. Cellular automata music: From sound synthesis to musical forms. In Miranda, E. R. and Biles, J. A. (eds.) Evolutionary Computer Music. London: Springer-Verlag, 170–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nierhaus, Gerhard. 2009. Algorithmic Composition: Paradigms of Automated Music Generation. Wien: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pachet, Francois. 2003. The continuator: Musical interaction with style. Journal of New Music Research 32(3), 333–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plans Casal, David and Morelli, Davide. 2007. Remembering the future: An overview of co-evolution in musical improvisation. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, 200–5.Google Scholar
Polli, Andrea. 2004. Modelling storms in sound: The Atmospheric/Weather Works Project. Organised Sound 9(2), 175–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pressing, Jeff. 1987. Improvisation: Methods and models. In Sloboda, J. (ed.) Generative Processes in Music: The Psychology of Performance, Improvisation, and Composition. New York: Oxford University Press, 129–78.Google Scholar
Pressing, Jeff. 1988. Nonlinear maps as generators of musical design. Computer Music Journal 12(2), 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahn, John. 2004. The swerve and the flow: Music’s relation to mathematics. Perspectives of New Music 42(1), 130–48.Google Scholar
Stowell, Daniel et al. 2009. Evaluation of live human-computer music-making: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 67(11), 960–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, Peter M. and Werner, Gregory M. 1999. Frankensteinian methods for evolutionary music composition. In Griffith, N. and Todd, P. M. (eds.) Musical Networks: Parallel Distributed Perception and Performance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 313–39.Google Scholar
Wanderley, Marcelo and Orio, Nicola. 2002. Evaluation of input devices for musical expression: Borrowing tools from HCI. Computer Music Journal 26(3), 62–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waschka, Rodney II. 2007. Composing with genetic algorithms: GenDash. In Miranda, E. R. and Biles, J. A. (eds.) Evolutionary Computer Music. London: Springer-Verlag, 117–36.Google Scholar
Worrall, David. 2009. An introduction to data sonification. In Dean, R. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Computer Music. New York: Oxford University Press, 312–33.Google Scholar
Young, Michael. 2008. NN Music: Improvising with a ‘living’ computer. In Kronland-Martinet, R., Ystad, S. and Jensen, K. (eds.) Computer Music Modelling and Retrieval: Sense of Sounds. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 337–50.Google Scholar
Young, Michael. 2010. Identity and intimacy in human-computer improvisation. Leonardo Music Journal [online] 20. www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/LMJ_a_00022 (accessed 9 April 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Michael and Blackwell, Tim. 2013. Live algorithms for music: Can computers be improvisers? In Lewis, G. E. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Critical Improvisation Studies. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
References
Delmonte, R. and Baroni, M. (eds.). 1993. Atti del Secondo Convegno Europeo di Analisi Musicale. Universitá di Trento.Google Scholar
Dunsby, Jonathan. 1989. Considerations of texture. Music & Letters 70(1), 46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jammer, Max. 2006. Concepts of Simultaneity: From Antiquity to Einstein and Beyond. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, Gary. 2008a. What is an event? The EVENT schema in relation to listening and electroacoustic cognition. Proceedings of the Electroacoustic Music Network Conference (EMS08), Paris. www.ems-network.org/ems08/papers/kendall.pdf.Google Scholar
Kendall, Gary. 2008b. What is an event? The EVENT schema, circumstances, metaphor and gist. Proceedings of the 2008 International Computer Music Conference, Belfast.Google Scholar
Landy, Leigh. 2007a. The Music of Sounds. Série Musique et nouvelles Technologies 3. Paris: Mint/Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Landy, Leigh. 2007b. Understanding the Art of Sound Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mountain, Rosemary. 1998. Periodicity and musical texture. http://armchair-researcher.com/Rooms/Research/Rooms/writings/articles/PeriodicityMusical-Texture.pdf (accessed 6 September 2015)Google Scholar
Roy, Stéphane. 2003. L’analyse des musiques électroacoustiques: modèles et propositions. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Wishart, Trevor. 1994. Audible Design: A Plain and Easy Introduction to Practical Sound Composition. York: Orpheus The Pantomime.Google Scholar
Young, John. 2010. Formación de la forma. In Minsburg, R. and Landy, L. (eds.) En el límite – Escritos sobre arte y tecnología. Buenos Aires: Ediciones de la Unla.Google Scholar
de Armas, Ricardo. 2011. El sueño de la razón roduce monstruos. Electroacoustic work. https://soundcloud.com/ricardodearmas/el-sue-o-de-la-raz-n-produce (accessed 11 April 2015).Google Scholar
Garzón, Eleazar. 2005. Marfíl y ebano. Electroacoustic work in Sonidos en mi laberinto.Google Scholar
Luna, Fabián Esteban. 2010. Omnipraesentia. Electroacoustic work. https://soundcloud.com/fabianestebanluna/omnipraesentia-2010 (accessed 11 April 2015).Google Scholar
Menezes, Flo. 2001. Harmonia das Esferas. Electroacoustic work in Música Maximalista * Maximal Music, Vol. 7, Studio PANaroma.Google Scholar
Parmegiani, Bernard. 1974. Incidences/Resonances. On De natura sonorum. INA/GRM, AM 714.01.Google Scholar
Rudy, Paul. 2007. In Lake’ch. Electroacoustic work. https://play.spotify.com/album/1Vp23oIlEAJ0PvmOw6llpp (accessed 11 April 2015).Google Scholar
de Armas, Ricardo. 2011. El sueño de la razón roduce monstruos. Electroacoustic work. https://soundcloud.com/ricardodearmas/el-sue-o-de-la-raz-n-produce (accessed 11 April 2015).Google Scholar
Garzón, Eleazar. 2005. Marfíl y ebano. Electroacoustic work in Sonidos en mi laberinto.Google Scholar
Luna, Fabián Esteban. 2010. Omnipraesentia. Electroacoustic work. https://soundcloud.com/fabianestebanluna/omnipraesentia-2010 (accessed 11 April 2015).Google Scholar
Menezes, Flo. 2001. Harmonia das Esferas. Electroacoustic work in Música Maximalista * Maximal Music, Vol. 7, Studio PANaroma.Google Scholar
Parmegiani, Bernard. 1974. Incidences/Resonances. On De natura sonorum. INA/GRM, AM 714.01.Google Scholar
Rudy, Paul. 2007. In Lake’ch. Electroacoustic work. https://play.spotify.com/album/1Vp23oIlEAJ0PvmOw6llpp (accessed 11 April 2015).Google Scholar
Recordings
de Armas, Ricardo. 2011. El sueño de la razón roduce monstruos. Electroacoustic work. https://soundcloud.com/ricardodearmas/el-sue-o-de-la-raz-n-produce (accessed 11 April 2015).Google Scholar
Garzón, Eleazar. 2005. Marfíl y ebano. Electroacoustic work in Sonidos en mi laberinto.Google Scholar
Luna, Fabián Esteban. 2010. Omnipraesentia. Electroacoustic work. https://soundcloud.com/fabianestebanluna/omnipraesentia-2010 (accessed 11 April 2015).Google Scholar
Menezes, Flo. 2001. Harmonia das Esferas. Electroacoustic work in Música Maximalista * Maximal Music, Vol. 7, Studio PANaroma.Google Scholar
Parmegiani, Bernard. 1974. Incidences/Resonances. On De natura sonorum. INA/GRM, AM 714.01.Google Scholar
Rudy, Paul. 2007. In Lake’ch. Electroacoustic work. https://play.spotify.com/album/1Vp23oIlEAJ0PvmOw6llpp (accessed 11 April 2015).Google Scholar