Todd, F.H. Some further experiments on single-screw merchant ship forms – Series 60. Transactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 61, 1953, pp. 516–589.Google Scholar

Todd, F.H., Stuntz, G.R. and Pien, P.C. Series 60 – The effect upon resistance and power of variation in ship proportions. Transactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 65, 1957, pp. 445–589.Google Scholar

Lackenby, H. and Milton, D. DTMB Standard series 60. A new presentation of the resistance data for block coefficient, LCB, breadth-draught ratio and length-breadth ratio variations. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 114, 1972, pp. 183–220.Google Scholar

Moor, D.I., Parker, M.N. and Pattullo, R.N.M. The BSRA methodical series – An overall presentation. Geometry of forms and variation in resistance with block coefficient and LCB. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 103, 1961, pp. 329–440.Google Scholar

Lackenby, H. and Parker, M.N. The BSRA methodical series – An overall presentation: Variation of resistance with breadth-draught ratio and length- displacement ratio. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 108, 1966, pp. 363–388.Google Scholar

BSRA. Methodical series experiments on single-screw ocean-going merchant ship forms. Extended and revised overall analysis. BSRA Report NS333, 1971.Google Scholar

Williams, Å. The SSPA cargo liner series propulsion. SSPA Report No. 67, 1970.Google Scholar

Williams, Å. The SSPA cargo liner series resistance. SSPA Report No. 66, 1969.Google Scholar

Roseman, D.P. (ed.) The MARAD systematic series of full-form ship models. Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, 1987.Google Scholar

Gertler, M. A reanalysis of the original test data for the Taylor Standard Series. DTMB Report No. 806, DTMB, Washington, DC, 1954. Reprinted by SNAME, 1998.Google Scholar

Linblad, A.F. Experiments with models of cargo liners. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 88, 1946, pp. 174–195.Google Scholar

Linblad, A.F. Some experiments with models of high-speed ships: Influence of block coefficient and longitudinal centre of buoyancy. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 91, 1949, pp. 137–158.Google Scholar

Zborowski, A. Approximate method for estimation of resistance and power of twin screw merchant ships. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 20, No. 221, January 1973, pp. 3–11.Google Scholar

Dawson, J. Resistance of single screw coasters. Part I, L/B = 6, Transactions of the Institute of Engineers and Shipbuilders in Scotland, Vol. 96, 1952–1953, pp. 313–384.Google Scholar

Dawson, J. Resistance and propulsion of single screw coasters. Part II, L/B = 6, Transactions of the Institute of Engineers and Shipbuilders in Scotland, Vol. 98, 1954–1955, pp. 49–84.Google Scholar

Dawson, J. Resistance and propulsion of single screw coasters. Part III, L/B = 6.5, Transactions of the Institute of Engineers and Shipbuilders in Scotland, Vol. 99, 1955–1956, pp. 360–441.Google Scholar

Dawson, J. Resistance and propulsion of single screw coasters. Part IV, L/B = 5.5. Transactions of the Institute of Engineers and Shipbuilders in Scotland, Vol. 102, 1958–1959, pp. 265–339.Google Scholar

Pattullo, R.N.M. and Thomson, G.R. The BSRA trawler series (Part I). Beam-draught and length-displacement ratio series, resistance and propulsion tests. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 107, 1965, pp. 215–241.Google Scholar

Pattullo, R.N.M. The BSRA Trawler Series (Part II). Block coefficient and longitudinal centre of buoyancy variation series, resistance and propulsion tests. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 110, 1968, pp. 151–183.Google Scholar

Thomson, G.R. and Pattullo, R.N.M. The BSRA Trawler Series (Part III). Block coefficient and longitudinal centre of buoyancy variation series, tests with bow and stern variations. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 111, 1969, pp. 317–342.Google Scholar

Pattullo, R.N.M. The resistance and propulsion qualities of a series of stern trawlers. Variation of longitudinal position of centre of buoyancy, beam, draught and block coefficient. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 116, 1974, pp. 347–372.Google Scholar

Ridgely-Nevitt, C. The resistance of trawler hull forms of 0.65 prismatic coefficient. Transactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 64, 1956, pp. 443–468.Google Scholar

Ridgely-Nevitt, C. The development of parent hulls for a high displacement- length series of trawler forms. Transactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 71, 1963, pp. 5–30.Google Scholar

Ridgely-Nevitt, C. The resistance of a high displacement-length ratio trawler series. Transactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 75, 1967, pp. 51–78.Google Scholar

Parker, M.N. and Dawson, J. Tug propulsion investigation. The effect of a buttock flow stern on bollard pull, towing and free-running performance. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 104, 1962, pp. 237–279.Google Scholar

Moor, D.I. An investigation of tug propulsion. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 105, 1963, pp. 107–152.Google Scholar

Nordström, H.F. Some tests with models of small vessels. Publications of the Swedish State Shipbuilding Experimental Tank. Report No. 19, 1951.Google Scholar

Lindgren, H. and Williams, Å. Systematic tests with small fast displacement vessels including the influence of spray strips. SSPA Report No. 65, 1969.Google Scholar

Beys, P.M. Series 63 – round bottom boats. Stevens Institute of Technology, Davidson Laboratory Report No. 949, 1993.Google Scholar

Yeh, H.Y.H. Series 64 resistance experiments on high-speed displacement forms. Marine Technology, July 1965, pp. 248–272.Google Scholar

Wellicome, J.F., Molland, A.F., Cic, J. and Taunton, D.J. Resistance experiments on a high speed displacement catamaran of Series 64 form. University of Southampton, Ship Science Report No. 106, 1999.Google Scholar

Karafiath, G. and Carrico, T. Series 64 parent hull displacement and static trim variations. Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, FAST’2003, Ischia, Italy, October 2003, pp. 27–30.Google Scholar

Molland, A.F., Karayannis, T., Taunton, D.J. and Sarac-Williams, Y. Preliminary estimates of the dimensions, powering and seakeeping characteristics of fast ferries. Proceedings of Eighth International Marine Design Conference, IMDC’2003, Athens, Greece, May 2003.Google Scholar

Bailey, D. The NPL high speed round bilge displacement hull series. Maritime Technology Monograph No. 4, Royal Institution of Naval Architects, 1976.Google Scholar

Compton, R.H. Resistance of a systematic series of semi-planing transom stern hulls. Marine Technology, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1986, pp. 345–370.Google Scholar

Robson, B.L. Systematic series of high speed displacement hull forms for naval combatants. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 130, 1988, pp. 241–259.Google Scholar

Lahtiharju, E., Karppinen, T., Helleraara, M. and Aitta, T. Resistance and seakeeping characteristics of fast transom stern hulls with systematically varied form. Transactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 99, 1991, pp. 85–118.Google Scholar

Gamulin, A. A displacement series of ships. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 43, No. 434, 1996, pp. 93–107.Google Scholar

Radojcic, D., Princevac, M. and Rodic, T. Resistance and trim predictions for the SKLAD semi-displacement hull series. Ocean Engineering International, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1999, pp. 34–50.Google Scholar

Radojcic, D., Grigoropoulos, G.J., Rodic, T., Kuvelic, T. and Damala, D.P. The resistance and trim of semi-displacement, double-chine, transom-stern hulls. Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, FAST’2001, Southampton, September 2001, pp. 187–195.Google Scholar

Grigoropoulos, G.J. and Loukakis, T.A. Resistance and seakeeping characteristics of a systematic series in the pre-planing condition (Part I). Transactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 110, 2002, pp. 77–113.Google Scholar

Clement, E.P. and Blount, D.L. Resistance tests on a systematic series of planing hull forms. Transactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 71, 1963, pp. 491–579.Google Scholar

Keuning, J.A. and Gerritsma, J. Resistance tests on a series of planing hull forms with 25° deadrise angle. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 29, No. 337, September 1982.Google Scholar

Kowalyshyn, D.H. and Metcalf, B. A USCG systematic series of high-speed planing hulls. Transactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 114, 2006.Google Scholar

Hadler, J.B., Hubble, E.N. and Holling, H.D. Resistance characteristics of a systematic series of planing hull forms – Series 65. The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Chesapeake Section, May 1974.Google Scholar

Savitsky, D. The hydrodynamic design of planing hulls. Marine Technology, Vol. 1, 1964, pp. 71–95.Google Scholar

Mercier, J.A. and Savitsky, D. Resistance of transom stern craft in the pre-planing regime. Davidson Laboratory, Stevens Institute of Technology, Report No. 1667, 1973.Google Scholar

Savitsky, D. and Ward Brown, P. Procedures for hydrodynamic evaluation of planing hulls in smooth and rough waters. Marine Technology, Vol. 13, No. 4, October 1976, pp. 381–400.Google Scholar

Hadler, J.B. The prediction of power performance of planing craft. Transactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 74, 1966, pp. 563–610.Google Scholar

Insel, M. and Molland, A.F. An investigation into the resistance components of high speed displacement catamarans. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 134, 1992, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Molland, A.F. Wellicome, J.F. and Couser, P.R. Resistance experiments on a systematic series of high speed displacement catamaran forms: Variation of length-displacement ratio and breadth-draught ratio. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 138, 1996, pp. 55–71.Google Scholar

Molland, A.F. and Lee, A.R. An investigation into the effect of prismatic coefficient on catamaran resistance. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 139, 1997, pp. 157–165.Google Scholar

Couser, P.R., Molland, A.F., Armstrong, N.A. and Utama, I.K.A.P. Calm water powering predictions for high speed catamarans. Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, FAST’97, Sydney, July 1997.Google Scholar

Steen, S., Rambech, H.J., Zhao, R. and Minsaas, K.J. Resistance prediction for fast displacement catamarans. Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, FAST’99, Seattle, September 1999.Google Scholar

Cassella, P., Coppola, C., Lalli, F., Pensa, C., Scamardella, A. and Zotti, I. Geosim experimental results of high-speed catamaran: Co-operative investigation on resistance model tests methodology and ship-model correlation. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and Mobile Units, PRADS’98, The Hague, The Netherlands, September 1998.Google Scholar

Bruzzone, D., Cassella, P., Pensa, C., Scamardella, A. and Zotti, I. On the hydrodynamic characteristics of a high-speed catamaran with round-bilge hull: Wave resistance and wave pattern experimental tests and numerical calculations. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, FAST’97, Sydney, July 1997.Google Scholar

Bruzzone, D., Cassella, P., Coppola, C., Russo Krauss, G. and Zotti, I. Power prediction for high-speed catamarans from analysis of geosim tests and from numerical results. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, FAST’99, Seattle, September 1999.Google Scholar

Utama, I.K.A.P. Investigation of the viscous resistance components of catamaran forms. Ph.D. thesis, University of Southampton, Department of Ship Science, 1999.Google Scholar

Müller-Graf, B. SUSA – The scope of the VWS hard chine catamaran hull series’89. Proceedings of Second International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, FAST’93, Yokahama, 1993, pp. 223–237.Google Scholar

Zips, J.M. Numerical resistance prediction based on the results of the VWS hard chine catamaran hull series’89. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, FAST’95, Lübeck-Travemünde, Germany, 1995, pp. 67–74.Google Scholar

Müller-Graf, B., Radojcic, D. and Simic, A. Resistance and propulsion characteristics of the VWS hard chine catamaran hull series’89. Transactions of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 110, 2002, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar

Gerritsma, J., Moeyes, G. and Onnink, R. Test results of a systematic yacht hull series. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 25, No. 287, July 1978, pp. 163–180.Google Scholar

Gerritsma, J., Onnink, R. and Versluis, A. Geometry, resistance and stability of the Delft Systematic Yacht Hull Series. 7th International Symposium on Developments of Interest to Yacht Architecture 1981. Interdijk BV, Amsterdam, 1981, pp. 27–40.Google Scholar

Gerritsma, J., Keuning, J. and Onnink, R. The Delft Systematic Yacht Hull (Series II) experiments. The 10th Chesapeake Sailing Yacht Symposium, Annapolis. The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, 1991, pp. 27–40.Google Scholar

Gerritsma, J., Keuning, J. and Onnink, R. Sailing yacht performance in calm water and waves. 12th International HISWA Symposium on “Yacht Design and Yacht Construction”. Delft University of Technology Press, Amsterdam, 1992, pp. 115–149.Google Scholar

Keuning, J., Onnink, R., Versluis, A. and Gulik, A. V. Resistance of the unappended Delft Systematic Yacht Hull Series. 14th International HISWA Symposium on “Yacht Design and Yacht Construction”. Delft University of Technology Press, Amsterdam, 1996, pp. 37–50.Google Scholar

Keuning, J. and Sonnenberg, U. Approximation of the hydrodynamic forces on a sailing yacht based on the ‘Delft Systematic Yacht Hull Series’. 15th International HISWA Symposium on “Yacht Design and Yacht Construction”, Amsterdam. Delft University of Technology Press, Amsterdam, 1998, pp. 99–152.Google Scholar

ORC VPP Documentation 2009. Offshore Racing Congress. http://www.orc.org/ (last accessed 3rd June 2010). 69 pages.Google Scholar

Hoerner, S.F. Fluid-Dynamic Drag. Published by the author, New York, 1965.Google Scholar

Moor, D.I. and Small, V.F. The effective horsepower of single-screw ships: Average modern attainment with particular reference to variation of C_B and LCB. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 102, 1960, pp. 269–313.Google Scholar

Moor, D.I. Resistance and propulsion properties of some modern single screw tanker and bulk carrier forms. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 117, 1975, pp. 201–214.Google Scholar

Clements, R.E. and Thompson, G.R. Model experiments on a series of 0.85 block coefficient forms. The effect on resistance and propulsive efficiency of variation in LCB. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 116, 1974, pp. 283–317.Google Scholar

Clements, R.E. and Thompson, G.R. Model experiments on a series of 0.85 block coefficient forms. The effect on resistance and propulsive efficiency of variation in breadth-draught ratio and length-displacement ratio. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 116, 1974, pp. 319–328.Google Scholar

Moor, D.I. and O'Connor, F.R.C. Resistance and propulsion factors of some single-screw ships at fractional draught. Transactions of the North East Coast Institution of Engineers and Shipbuilders, Vol. 80, 1963–1964, pp. 185–202.Google Scholar

Sabit, A.S. Regression analysis of the resistance results of the BSRA series. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 18, No. 197, January 1971, pp. 3–17.Google Scholar

Sabit, A.S. An analysis of the Series 60 results: Part I, Analysis of forms and resistance results. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 19, No. 211, March 1972, pp. 81–97.Google Scholar

Sabit, A.S. The SSPA cargo liner series regression analysis of the resistance and propulsive coefficients. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 23, 1976, pp. 213–217.Google Scholar

Holtrop, J. A statistical analysis of performance test results. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 24, No. 270, February 1977, pp. 23–28.Google Scholar

Holtrop, J. and Mennen, G.G.J. A statistical power prediction method. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 25, No. 290, October 1978, pp. 253–256.Google Scholar

Holtrop, J. and Mennen, G.G.J. An approximate power prediction method. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 29, No. 335, July 1982, pp. 166–170.Google Scholar

Holtrop, J. A statistical re-analysis of resistance and propulsion data. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 31, 1984, pp. 272–276.Google Scholar

Hollenbach, K.U. Estimating resistance and propulsion for single-screw and twin-screw ships. Ship Technology Research, Vol. 45, Part 2, 1998, pp. 72–76.Google Scholar

Radojcic, D. A statistical method for calculation of resistance of the stepless planing hulls. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 31, No. 364, December 1984, pp. 296–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Radojcic, D. An approximate method for calculation of resistance and trim of the planing hulls. University of Southampton, Ship Science Report No. 23, 1985.Google Scholar

van Oortmerssen, G. A power prediction method and its application to small ships. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 18, No. 207, 1971, pp. 397–412.Google Scholar

Robinson, J.L. Performance prediction of chine and round bilge hull forms. International Conference: Hydrodynamics of High Speed Craft. Royal Institution of Naval Architects, London, November 1999.Google Scholar

Doust, D.J. Optimised trawler forms. Transactions NECIES, Vol. 79, 1962–1963, pp. 95–136.Google Scholar

Swift, P.M., Nowacki, H. and Fischer, J.P. Estimation of Great Lakes bulk carrier resistance based on model test data regression. Marine Technology, Vol. 10, 1973, pp. 364–379.Google Scholar

Fairlie-Clarke, A.C. Regression analysis of ship data. International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 22, No. 251, 1975, pp. 227–250.Google Scholar

Molland, A.F. and Watson, M.J. The regression analysis of some ship model resistance data. University of Southampton, Ship Science Report No. 36, 1988.Google Scholar

Lin, C.-W., Day, W.G. and Lin, W.-C. Statistical prediction of ship’s effective power using theoretical formulation and historic data. Marine Technology, Vol. 24, No. 3, July 1987, pp. 237–245.Google Scholar

Raven, H.C., Van Der Ploeg, A., Starke, A.R. and Eça, L. Towards a CFD-based prediction of ship performance – progress in predicting full-scale resistance and scale effects. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 150, 2008, pp. 31–42.Google Scholar

Froude, R.E. On the ‘constant’ system of notation of results of experiments on models used at the Admiralty Experiment Works. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 29, 1888, pp. 304–318.Google Scholar

Blount, D.L. Factors influencing the selection of a hard chine or round-bilge hull for high Froude numbers. Proceedings of Third International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation, FAST’95, Lübeck-Travemünde, 1995.Google Scholar

Savitsky, D. and Koelbel, J.G. Seakeeping considerations in design and operation of hard chine planing hulls. The Naval Architect. Royal Institution of Naval Architects, London, March 1979, pp. 55–59.Google Scholar

Correspondence with WUMTIA, University of Southampton, March 2010.Google Scholar

Molland, A.F., Wellicome, J.F. and Couser, P.R. Resistance experiments on a systematic series of high speed displacement catamaran forms: Variation of length-displacement ratio and breadth-draught ratio. University of Southampton, Ship Science Report No. 71, 1994.Google Scholar

Fossati, F., Robustelli, F., Schito, P. and Bertorello, C. Experimental and numerical assessment of high speed small craft aerodynamics. Proceedings of the HSMV Conference, Naples, October, 2014.Google Scholar

Taunton, D.J., Hudson, D.A. and Shenoi, R.A. Characteristics of a series of high speed hard chine planing hulls – Part I: Performance in calm water. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 152, Part B2, 2010, pp. B55–B74.Google Scholar

Taunton, D.J., Hudson, D.A. and Shenoi, R.A. Characteristics of a series of high speed hard chine planing hulls – Part II: Performance in waves. Transactions of the Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol. 153, Part B1, 2011, pp. B1–B22.Google Scholar

Burcher, R.K. and Rydill, L.J. Concepts in Submarine Design. Cambridge Ocean Technology Series, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1994.Google Scholar

Renilson, M. Submarine Hydrodynamics. Springer Science and Business Media, London, 2015.Google Scholar

Joubert, P.N. Some aspects of submarine design Part 1 – Hydrodynamics. Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Australia, Technical Report, DSTO-TR-1622, October 2004.Google Scholar

Joubert, P.N. Some aspects of submarine design Part 2 – Shape of a submarine 2026. Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Australia, Technical Report, DSTO-TR-1920, December 2006.Google Scholar

Moonesum, M., Javadi, M., Charmdooz, P. and Mikhailovich, K.U. Evaluation of submarine model test in towing tank and comparison with CFD and experimental formulas for fully submerged resistance. Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences, Vol. 24(8), 2013, 1049–1056.Google Scholar

Rawson, K.J. and Tupper, E.C. Basic Ship Theory. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford. Fifth Edition, 2001.Google Scholar

Molland, A.F. and Turnock, S.R. Marine Rudders and Control Surfaces. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2007.Google Scholar

Bronneberg, L., Ramos, A.A. and Tancredi, T.P. Influence of the sail in the drag resistance of submarines. Proceedings of PRADS’2013, Changwon City, Korea, 2013, pp. 1052–1062.Google Scholar

Bertram, V. and Alvarez, A. Hydrodynamic aspects of AUV design. Proceedings of COMPIT’06, 5th International Conference on Computer Applications and Information Technology in the Maritime Industries. Oegstgeest, Holland, 2006, pp. 45–53.Google Scholar

Phillips, A., Furlong, M. and Turnock, S.R. The use of computational fluid dynamics to assess the hull resistance of concept autonomous underwater vehicles. Proceedings of OCEANS2007 – Europe, Aberdeen, UK, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, USA, 2007, pp. 1292–1297.Google Scholar

Hoerner, S.F. Fluid Dynamic Drag. Published by the Author, Washington D.C., 1965.Google Scholar

Hough, G.R. and Moran, S.P. Froude number effects on two-dimensional hydrofoils. Journal of Ship Research. Vol. 13 (1), 1969, pp. 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abbot, I.H. and Von Doenhoff, A.E. Theory of Wing Sections. Dover Publications, New York, 1958.Google Scholar

Clayton, B.R. and Bishop, R.E.D. Mechanics of Marine Vehicles. E. and F.N. Spon, London, 1982.Google Scholar

Faltinsen, O.M. Hydrodynamics of High-Speed Marine Vehicles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005.Google Scholar