Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T22:30:03.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Pain Management and Recovery after RAS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2017

Alan David Kaye
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University
Richard D. Urman
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lee, R.S.. Pediatric Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Dismembered Pyeloplasty: Comparison with a Cohort of Open Surgery. J Urol 2006; 175(2): 683–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Knox, M.L.. Robotic Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: Identification of Patients Who Benefit from the Robotic Approach. J Endourol 2013; 27(1): 40–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrell, S.D.. Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: What Is the Learning Curve? Urology 2005; 66(5), suppl, 105: 7.Google Scholar
Mack, M.. Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery. JAMA 2001; 285(5): 568–72.Google Scholar
Ramirez, P.T., Schmeler, K.M., Wolf, J.K.. Robotic Radical Parametrectomy and Pelvic Lympadenectomy in Patients with Invasive Cervical Cancer. Gynecologic Oncology 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C.H.. Comparing Robotic Surgery with Conventional Laparoscopy and Laparotomy for Cervical Cancer Management. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2014; 24(5): 1105–11.Google Scholar
Ryu, J.. Retropubic Versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Study of Postoperative Complications. Korean J Urol 2013; 54(11): 756–61.Google Scholar
Menon, M.. Prospective Comparison of Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy and Robot Assisted Anatomic Prostatectomy: The Vattikuti Urology Institute Experience. Urology 2002; 60(5): 864–8.Google Scholar
Costello, T.G.. Anaesthesia for Robot Assisted Anatomic Prostatectomy. Experience at a Single Institution. Anaesth Intensive Care 2006; 34: 787–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guru, K.A.. Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: Assessment of Postoperative Pain. Can J Urol 2007; 14(6): 3753–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Paraiso, M.R.. Laparoscopic Compared with Robotic Sacrocolpoplexy for Vaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2011; 118(5): 1005–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinoglio, G.. Robotic Colorectal Surgery: First 50 Cases Experience. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 2008; 51(11): 1627–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hotujec, B.T.. Transversus Abdominal Plane Block in Robotic Gynecologic Oncology: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 136(3): 460–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Hachem, L.. Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Trial of Transversus Abdominal Plane Block Versus Trocar Site Infiltration in Gynecologic Laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212(2): 182.e1–9.Google Scholar
Hutchins, J.. Ultrasound Guided Subcostal Transversus Abdominal Plane Infiltration with Liposomal Bupivacaine for Patients Undergoing Robotic Assisted Hysterectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 138(3): 609–13.Google Scholar
Chahar, P.. Liposomal Bupivacaine: A Review of a New Bupivacaine Formulation. J Pain Res 2012; 5: 257–64.Google Scholar
Deshpande, S.P.. Anesthetic Management of Robotically Assisted Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery (TECAB). J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2013; 27(3): 586–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deshpande, S.P.. Totally Endoscopic Robotic Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2014; 27(1): 4956.Google Scholar
Hsu, Y.W.. Robot-Assisted Mitral Valve Repair. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 2011; 25(4): 721–30.Google Scholar
Cogan, J.. Pain Levels after Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: Results for the First 7 Days. Anesth Analg 2010; 110: 1101.Google Scholar
Suri, R.M.. Optimizing Outcomes of Robotic Mitral Valve Repair for All Prolapse Anatomy: The Suri-Burkhart Technique. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2013; 2(6): 841–5.Google Scholar
Chauhan, S.. Anesthesia for Robotic Cardiac Surgery: An Amalgam of Technology and Skill. Ann Card Anaesth 2010; 13: 169–75.Google Scholar
Lynch, J. J.. Use of Paravertebral Blockade to Facilitate Early Extubation after Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010; 14: 748.Google Scholar
Neuburger, P.J.. A Prospective Randomized Study of Paravertebral Blockade in Patients Undergoing Robotic Mitral Valve Repair. J Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 2015; 29(4): 930–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baidya, D.K.. Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Thoracic Paravertebral and Epidural Analgesia for Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery 2014; 18(5): 626–35.Google Scholar
Lee, J.R.. Anesthetic Considerations for Robotic Surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol 2014; 66(1): 311.Google Scholar
Ramirez, P.T.. Society of Gynecologic Oncology Clinical Practice Robotics Task Force. Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology Consensus Statement. Gynecologic Oncology 2012; 124: 180–4.Google Scholar
Weksler, B.. Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Is Equivalent to Thoracoscopic Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 2012; 25: 403–9.Google Scholar
da Silva Sardenberg, R.A.. Robotic Thymectomy for Myasthenia Gravis. J bras pneumol 2011; 37(5).Google Scholar
Mehta, Y.. Comparison of Continuous Thoracic Epidural and Paravertebral Block for Postoperative Analgesia after Robotic-Assisted Coronary Bypass Surgery. Ann Card Anaesth 2008; 11: 91–6.Google Scholar
Punj, J.. Anesthesia for Robot Assisted Cystectomy: Our Initial Experience. The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology 2007; 16(1).Google Scholar
Hong, J.Y.. Effects of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Combined with General Anesthesia on Intraoperative Ventilation/Oxygenation and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. Journal Endourol 2009; 23(11): 1843–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerdie, B.. Chronic Widespread Pain: Increased Glutamate and Lactate Concentrations in the Trapezius Muscle and Plasma. Clin J Pain 2014; 30(5): 409–20.Google Scholar
Shultz, T.M.. Preemptive Multimodal Analgesia Facilitates Same-Day Discharge Following Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy. Journal of Robotic Surgery 2012; 6(2): 115–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trabulsi, E.J.. Preemptive Multimodal Pain Regimen Reduces Opioid Analgesia for Patients Undergoing Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. Urology 2010; 76(5): 1122–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, S.Y.. Perioperative Administration of Pregabalin for Pain after Robot-Assisted Endoscopic Thyroidectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 2776–81.Google Scholar
Agarwal, A.. Evaluation of a Single Preoperative Dose of Pregabalin for Attenuation of Postoperative Pain after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 101(5): 700–4.Google Scholar
Sarakatsianou, C.. Effect of Pre-emptive Pregabalin on Pain Intensity and Postoperative Morphine Consumption after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2013; 27(7): 2504–11.Google Scholar
Ammar, M.. Intravenous Acetaminophen – Is It Worth the Cost? Cleveland Clinic Clinical Rx Forum 2013; 1(2): 1, 57.Google Scholar
Wong, C.. Opioid-Free Analgesia Following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 217(3): S152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, J.Y.. Paracetamol Reduces Postoperative Pain and Rescue Analgesic Demand after Robot-Assisted Endoscopic Thyroidectomy by the Transaxillary Approach. World J Surg 2010; 34(3): 521–6.Google Scholar
Jahr, J.S.. Intravenous Acetaminophen: A Review of Pharmacoeconomic Science for Perioperative Use. Am J Ther 2013; 20(2): 189–99.Google Scholar
Ghomi, A.. Trendelenburg Position in Gynecologic Robotic Surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2012; 19(4): 485–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalmar, A.F.. Influence of Steep Trendelenburg Position and Co2 Pneumoperitoneum on Cardiovascular, Cerebrovascular, and Respiratory Homeostasis during Robotic Prostatectomy. Br J Anaesth 2010; 104: 433–9.Google Scholar
Lestar, M.. Hemodynamic Perturbations during Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in 45 Degree Trendelenburg Position. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2011; 113(5): 1069–75.Google Scholar
Mikami, O.. High Intra-abdominal Pressure Increases Plasma Catecholamine Concentrations during Pneumoperitoneum for Laparoscopic Procedures. Arch Surg 1998; 133(1): 3943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mann, C.. The Relationship among Carbon Dioxide Pneumoperitoneum, Vasopressin Release, and Hemodynamic Changes. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 278–83.Google Scholar
Swift, G.. A Prospective Randomised Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Trial to Assess Whether Gas Drains Reduce Shoulder Pain Following Gynaecological Laparoscopy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 42: 267–70.Google Scholar
Smith, H.S.. Arachidonic Acid Pathways in Nociception. J Support Oncol 2006; 4(6): 277–87.Google ScholarPubMed
Irvine, M.. Anaesthesia for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain 2009: 15.Google Scholar
Sarli, L.. Prospective Randomized Trial of Low-Pressure Pneumoperitoneum for Reduction of Shoulder-Tip Pain Following Laparoscopy. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 1161–5.Google Scholar
de Souza, A.B.. The Effect of Intra-abdominal Pressure on the Generation of 8-iso Prostaglandin F2A during Laparoscopy in Rabbits. Human Reproduction 2003; 18(10): 2181–8.Google Scholar
Shveiky, D. Brachial, D. Plexus Injury after Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010; 17(4): 414–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattei, A.. Positioning Injury, Rhabdomyolysis, and Serum Creatine Kinase Concentration Course in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection. J Endourol 2013; 27(1): 4551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pandey, R.. Brachial Plexus Injury after Robotic-Assisted Thoracoscopic Thymectomy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2009; 23: 584–6.Google Scholar
Chin, K.Y.. Bilateral Well Leg Compartment Syndrome Associated with Lithotomy (Lloyd Davies) Position during Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Case Report and Review of Literature. Eplasty 2009; 14(9): e48.Google Scholar
Wang, G.. Anesthesia Management for Robotically Assisted Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting on Beating Heart. Innovations (Phila) 2010; 5(4): 291–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekstein, P.. Laparoscopic Surgery May Be Associated with Severe Pain and High Analgesia Requirements in the Immediate Postoperative Period. Ann Surg 2006; 243(1): 41–6.Google Scholar
Martino, M.A.. A Cost Analysis of Postoperative Pain Management in Endometrial Cancer Patients: Robotic Surgery vs Laparoscopy Surgery. Poster presented at the 2011 Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Orlando, FLGoogle Scholar
Koo, K.C.. Analgesic Opioid Dose Is an Important Indicator of Postoperative Ileus Following Radical Cystectomy with Ileal Conduit: Experience in the Robotic Surgery Era. Yonsei Med J 2014; 55(5): 1359–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koc, G.. Lower Extremity Neuropathies after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy on a Split-Leg Table. Journal of Endourology 2012; 1026–9.Google Scholar
Calfee, D.P.. Strategies to Prevent Surgical Site Infections in Acute Care Hospitals. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 2008; 29(1): 5161.Google Scholar
Hermsen, E.D.. Incidence of Surgical Site Infection Associated with Robotic Surgery. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 2010; 31(8): 822–7.Google Scholar
Dunn, L.T.. Raised Intracranial Pressure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 73: i23–27.Google Scholar
Whiteley, J.R.. Detection of Elevated Intracranial Pressure in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy using Ultrasonography of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2015; 27(2): 155–9.Google Scholar
Awad, H.. The Effects of Steep Trendelenburg Positioning on Intraocular Pressure during Robotic Radical Prostatectomy. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2009; 109(2): 473–8.Google Scholar
Yoshikawa, Y, Tsutsumi, N, Ohkoshi, K, et al. The Effect of Steep Trendelenburg Positioning on Intraocular Pressure and Visual Function during Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2014; 98(3): 305–8.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×