Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T20:19:31.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Credentialing for Robotic Surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2017

By
Daniel M. Herron
Edited by
Alan David Kaye  and
Richard D. Urman
Alan David Kaye
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University
Richard D. Urman
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Perioperative Management in Robotic Surgery , pp. 8 - 13
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Griffen, FD, Sugar, JG. The future of robotics: a dilemma for general surgeons. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2013;98(7): 9–15. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24010216.Google Scholar
Zorn, KC, Gautam, G, Shalhav, AL, et al. Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: recommendations of the society of urologic robotic surgeons. J Urol. 2009;182(3): 1126–1132. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.042.Google ScholarPubMed
Med Prot Co. Credentialing and privileging medical protective. 2014;March.Google Scholar
LaValley, D (Ed.). Credentialing, privileging, & patient safety. Crico/RMF Forum. 2006;24(3):3–4.Google Scholar
NACHC. Human resources insights: tips for health center credentialing and privileging. Natl Assoc Community Heal Centers. 2013;May. www.nachc.com/hrclearinghouse/download-ch.cfm?df=Human Resources Insights May 201311.pdf&DID=195.Google Scholar
Kim, B, Chang, A, Kaswick, J, et al. Achieving proficiency with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: laparoscopic-trained versus robotics-trained surgeons. Can Urol Assoc J. 2013;7(11–12): E711–E715. doi:10.5489/cuaj.360.Google Scholar
Herron, D, Marohn, M. A consensus document on robotic surgery prepared by the SAGES-MIRA Robotic Surgery Consensus Group. Surg Endosc. 2007: 1–24. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00464-007-9727-5.Google Scholar
Lenihan, JPJ. Flight plan for robotic surgery. OBG Manag. 2014;26(11): 44–48.Google Scholar
ACOG. Committee opinion: robotic surgery in gynecology. www.acog.org/Resources-And-Publications/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Gynecologic-Practice/Robotic-Surgery-in-Gynecology. Published 2015.Google Scholar
Decastro, J, Trinh, Q-D, Zorn, K. Training and credentialing in robotic urologic surgery. In: Patel, V, ed. Robotic Urologic Surgery 2. London: Springer Verlag; 2012: 19–33.Google Scholar
AUA. Standard operating practices for urologic robotic surgery. www.auanet.org/common/pdf/about/SOP-Urologic-Robotic-Surgery.pdf.Google Scholar
Intuitive. da Vinci training. 2016. www.intuitivesurgical.com/training.Google Scholar
AAGL. AAGL position statement: robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in benign gynecology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(1): 2–9. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2012.12.007.Google Scholar
Smith, R, Patel, V, Chauhan, S, Satava, R. Fundamentals of robotic surgery: outcomes measures and curriculum development. NcsaglobalCom. 2012; (Figure 1). https://ncsaglobal.com/sites/default/files/research/Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery Outcomes Measures and Curriculum Development.pdf.Google Scholar
Szold, A, Bergamaschi, R, Broeders, I, et al. European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(2): 253–288. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3916-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Program. www.flsprogram.org/.Google Scholar
Dulan, G, Rege, R V, Hogg, DC, et al. Developing a comprehensive, proficiency-based training program for robotic surgery. Surgery. 2012;152(3): 477–488. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.028.Google Scholar
Attalla, K, Raza, SJ, Rehman, S, et al. Effectiveness of a dedicated robot-assiste surgery training program. Can J Urol. 2013;20(6): 7084–7090.Google Scholar
Sood, A, Jeong, W, Ahlawat, R, et al. Robotic surgical skill acquisition: what one needs to know? J Minim Access Surg. 2015;11(1): 10–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erickson, BK, Gleason, JL, Huh, WK, Richter, HE. Survey of robotic surgery credentialing requirements for physicians completing OB/GYN residency. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19(5): 589–592. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2012.05.003.Google Scholar
Culligan, P, Gurshumov, E, Lewis, C, Priestley, J, Komar, J, Salamon, C. Predicitive validity of a training protocol using a robotic surgery simulator. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr. 2014;20(1): 48–51.Google Scholar
Murphy, DH. The current assessment. Insid Med Liabil. 2014;3: 2–4.Google Scholar
Price, DJ. Robotic surgery: the human cost of the learning curve. Prefer Prof Insur Co Case Rev. 2015;4: 3–6. www.ppicins.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Robotic-Surgery.pdf.Google Scholar
Weatherly, LC. Medical malpractice law & strategy: is there a proctor in the house? Law J Newsletters. 2012; September.Google Scholar
Pradarelli, JC, Campbell, DA, Dimick, JB. Hospital credentialing and privileging of surgeons: a potential safety blind spot. JAMA. 2015;313(13): 1313–1314. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.1943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, JY, Mucksavage, P, Sundaram, CP, McDougall, EM. Best practices for robotic surgery training and credentialing. J Urol. 2011;185(4): 1191–1197. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Echelon Flex Powered Surgical Stapler. www.ethicon.com/healthcare-professionals/products/staplers/endocutters/powered-echelon-flex.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×