Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T18:25:02.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Inverse Modeling for Atmospheric Chemistry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2017

Guy P. Brasseur
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg
Daniel J. Jacob
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bousserez, N., Henze, D. K., Perkins, K. W., et al. (2015) Improved analysis-error covariance matrix for high-dimensional variational inversions: application to source estimation using a 3D atmospheric transport model, QJRMS, doi: 10.1002/qj.2495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deeter, M. N., Emmons, L. K., Francis, G. L., et al. (2003) Operational carbon monoxide retrieval algorithm and selected results for the MOPITT instrument, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4399.Google Scholar
Errera, Q. and Ménard, R. (2012) Technical note: Spectral representation of spatial correlations in variational assimilation with grid point models and application to the Belgian Assimilation System for Chemical Observations (BASCOE), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1001510031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Errera, Q., Daerden, F., Chabrillat, S., et al. (2008) 4D-Var assimilation of MIPAS chemical observations: Ozone and nitrogen dioxide analyses, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 61696187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heald, C. L., Jacob, D. J., Jones, D., et al. (2004) Comparative inverse analysis of satellite (MOPITT) and aircraft (TRACE-P) observations to estimate Asian sources of carbon monoxide, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D23306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henze, D. K., Hakami, A., and Seinfeld, J. H. (2007) Development of the adjoint of GEOS-Chem, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 24132433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, D. J., Crawford, J., Kleb, M., et al. (2003) The Transport and Chemical Evolution over the Pacific (TRACE-P) aircraft mission: Design, execution, and first results, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 9000.Google Scholar
Kim, P. S., Jacob, D. J., Mickley, L., et al. (2015) Sensitivity of population smoke exposure to fire locations in Equatorial Asia, Atmos. Environ., 102, 1117.Google Scholar
Kopacz, M., Jacob, D. J., Henze, D., et al. (2009) Comparison of adjoint and analytical Bayesian inversion methods for constraining Asian sources of carbon monoxide using satellite (MOPITT) measurements of CO columns, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D04305.Google Scholar
Miller, S. M., Michalak, A. M., and Levi, P. J. (2014) Atmospheric inverse modeling with known physical bounds: An example for trace gas emissions, Geosci. Mod. Dev., 7, 303315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, C. D. (2000) Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding, World Sci., Tokyo.Google Scholar
Rodgers, C. D., and Connor, B. J. (2003) Intercomparison of remote sounding instruments, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4116.Google Scholar
Turner, A. J. and Jacob, D. J. (2015) Balancing aggregation and smoothing errors in inverse models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 70397048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wecht, K. J., Jacob, D. J., Frankenberg, C., et al. (2014) Mapping of North America methane emissions with high spatial resolution by inversion of SCIAMACHY satellite data, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 77417756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L., Jacob, D. J., Liu, X., et al. (2010) Intercomparison methods for satellite measurements of atmospheric composition: Application to tropospheric ozone from TES and OMI, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 47254739.Google Scholar
Zoogman, P. W., Jacob, D. J., Chance, K., et al. (2014) Monitoring high-ozone events in the US Intermountain West using TEMPO geostationary satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 62616271.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×