Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T00:13:10.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - The Evolution of Company Law in Taiwan

A Focus on the Blockholder-Centric Model

from Part II - Application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2016

Yun-chien Chang
Affiliation:
Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
Wei Shen
Affiliation:
Shandong University, People's Republic of China
Wen-yeu Wang
Affiliation:
National Taiwan University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Private Law in China and Taiwan
Legal and Economic Analyses
, pp. 275 - 303
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References in Chinese

Lai, In-Jaw. 1984. Retrospect and Prospect of Chinese Company Legislation. National Taiwan University Law Journal 13(2):193230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Len-Yu. 2014. Modern Corporate Law. Taipei, Taiwan: New Sharing.Google Scholar
Shao, Ching-Ping. 2009. Recent Reforms and Developments in the US Corporate Director Election Regime–From a Comparative Law Perspective. National Chung Cheng University Law Journal 26:162.Google Scholar
Wang, Tay-sheng. 2015. The Process of Legal Modernization in Taiwan: From “the Extension of Mainland” to “Independent Recept-ion.” Taipei: Institute of Taiwan History, Academia Sinica and National Taiwan University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Wen-yeu. 2008. Corporation Law. Taipei, Taiwan: Angle Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References in English

Bainbridge, , Stephen, M. 2006. The Case for Limited Shareholder Voting Rights. UCLA Law Review 53(3):601636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebchuk, Lucian Arye, and Roe, Mark J.. 1999. A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Ownership and Governance. Stanford Law Review 52(1):127170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Bernard, and Kraakman, Reinier. 1996. A Self-Enforcing Model of Corporate Law. Harvard Law Review 109(8):19111982.Google Scholar
Blair, Margaret M., and Stout, Lynn A.. 1999. A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law. Virginia Law Review 85(2):247328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Ruoying. 2016. Evolution of Business Organization Law in China: More Than Meet the Eyes. In Private Law in China and Taiwan: Legal and Economic Analyses, edited by Chang, Yun-chien, Shan, Wei, and Wang, Wen-yeu. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Stephen J., and Talley, Eric L.. 2002. Playing Favorites with Shareholders. Southern California Law Review 75(2):271374.Google Scholar
Clark, Robert Charles. 1986. Corporate Law. New York: Aspen Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Dalebout, Richard S. 1989. Cumulative Voting for Corporation Directors: Majority Shareholders in the Role of a Fox Guarding a Hen House. Brigham Young University Law Review 1989(4):11991226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deffains, Bruno. 2016. Economics of Harmonization and Legal Convergence. In Private Law in China and Taiwan: Legal and Economic Analyses, edited by Chang, Yun-chien, Shan, Wei, and Wang, Wen-yeu. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterbrook, Frank H., and Fischel, Daniel R.. 1991. The Economic Structure of Corporate Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisch, Jill E. 2012. The Destructive Ambiguity of Federal Proxy Access. Emory Law Journal. 61(3):435500.Google Scholar
Glazer, Amihai, Glazer, Debra G., and Grofman, Bernard. 1984. Cumulative Voting in Corporate Elections: Introducing Strategy into the Equation. South Carolina Law Review 35(2):295309.Google Scholar
Gordon, Jeffrey N. 1994. Institutions As Relational Investors: A New Look at Cumulative Voting. Columbia Law Review 94(1):124192.Google Scholar
Gulinello, Christopher John. 2003. The Revision of Taiwan's Company Law: The Struggle toward A Shareholder-Oriented Model in One Corner of East Asia. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 28(1):75127.Google Scholar
Hansmann, Henry, and Kraakman, Reinier, 2001. The End of History for Corporate Law. Georgia Law Journal 89(2):439468.Google Scholar
Jensen, Michael C., and Meckling, William H.. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(4):305360.Google Scholar
Kirby, William C. 1990. Continuity and Change in Modern China: Economic Planning on the Mainland and on Taiwan, 1943–1958. The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 24:121141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, William C. 1995. China Unincorporated: Company Law and Business Enterprise in Twentieth-Century China. The Journal of Asian Studies 54(1):4363.Google Scholar
Klausner, Michael. 1995. Corporations, Corporate Law, and Networks of Contracts. Virginia Law Review 81(3):757852.Google Scholar
Kraakman, Reinier, Armour, John, Davies, Paul, Enriques, Luca, Hansmann, Henry B., Hertig, Gérard, Hopt, Klaus J., Kanda, Hideki, and Rock, Edward B.. 2009. The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, and Shleifer, Andrei. 1999. Corporate Ownership around the World. The Journal of Finance 54(2):471517.Google Scholar
La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert. 1998. Law and Finance. Journal of Political Economy 106(6):11131155.Google Scholar
Levmore, Saul. 2016. Concentrated and Distributed Law: Observations on Legal Evolution from China and Taiwan. In Private Law in China and Taiwan: Legal and Economic Analyses, edited by Chang, Yun-chien, Shan, Wei, and Wang, Wen-yeu. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Yu-Hsin. 2011. Overseeing Controlling Shareholders: Do Independent Directors Constrain Tunneling in Taiwan? San Diego International Law Journal 12(2):363416.Google Scholar
Liu, Lawrence S. 2003. Global Markets and Parochial Institutions: The Transformation of Taiwan's Corporate Law System. Pp. 400434 in Global Markets, Domestic Institutions, edited by Milhaupt, Curtis J.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Lawrence S. 2008. The Politics of Corporate Governance in Taiwan. Pp. 255277 in Transforming Corporate Governance in East Asia, edited by Kanda, Hideki, Kim, Kon-Sik, and Milhaupt, Curtis J.. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mills, Lewis R. 1968. The Mathematics of Cumulative Voting. Duke Law Journal. 1968(1):2843.Google Scholar
Romano, Roberta. 2005. The Sarbanes–Oxley Act and the Making of Quack Corporate Governance. Yale Law Journal 114(7):15211611.Google Scholar
Shao, Ching-Ping. 2014. Representative Litigations in Corporate and Securities Laws by Government-Sanctioned Nonprofit Organizations: Lessons from Taiwan. Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal 15(1):5893.Google Scholar
Striegel, June A. 1987. Cumulative Voting, Yesterday and Today: The July, 1986 Amendments to Ohio's General Corporation Law. University of Cincinnati Law Review 55(4):12651284.Google Scholar
Tsai, Chang-Hsien. 2012. Exit, Voice and International Jurisdictional Competition: A Case Study of the Evolution of Taiwan's Regulatory Regime for Outward Investment in Mainland China, 19972008. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce 39(2):303356.Google Scholar
Wang, Wallace Wen-yeu and Chen, Jian-Lin. 2008. Reforming China's Securities Civil Actions: Lessons from PSLRA Reform in the U.S. and Government-Sanctioned Non-Profit Enforcement in Taiwan. Columbia Journal of Asian Law 21(2):115160.Google Scholar
Williams, Charles M. 1955. Cumulative Voting. Harvard Business Review. 33(3):108114.Google Scholar
Yeh, Yin-hua, Tsun-sion, Lee, and Woidtke, Tracie. 2001. Family Control and Corporate Governance. International Review of Finance 2(1/2):2148.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×