Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T13:29:56.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2016

Richard Atkins
Richard Atkins
Affiliation:
Boston College, Massachusetts
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Peirce and the Conduct of Life
Sentiment and Instinct in Ethics and Religion
 , pp. 220 - 227
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Alston, William. 1991. “The Inductive Problem of Evil and the Human Cognitive Condition.” In Philosophical Perspectives. Vol. 5. Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing, 29–67.Google Scholar
Anderson, Douglas. 2004. “Peirce’s Common Sense Marriage of Religion and Science.” In The Cambridge Companion to Peirce. Ed. Misak, Cheryl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Douglas. 1995. Strands of System. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Douglas. 1990. “Three Appeals in Peirce’s Neglected Argument.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 26:3, 349–362.Google Scholar
Atkin, Albert. 2016. Peirce. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Atkins, Peter. 1994. Creation Revisited. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Atkins, Richard Kenneth. Forthcoming. “Peirce on Truth as the Predestinate Opinion.” European Journal of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Atkins, Richard Kenneth. 2014. “The Inferences That Never Were: Peirce, Perception, and Bernstein’s The Pragmatic Turn.” In Richard J. Bernstein and the Pragmatist Turn in Contemporary Philosophy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 55–67.Google Scholar
Atkins, Richard Kenneth. 2006. “Restructuring the Sciences: Peirce’s Categories and His Classification of the Sciences.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 42:4, 483–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayim, Maryann. 1982. Peirce’s View of the Roles of Reason and Instinct in Scientific Inquiry. Meerut, India: Anu Prakashan.Google Scholar
Baldwin, James Mark. 1902. Development and Evolution. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Baldwin, James Mark. 1894. Handbook of Psychology. Vol. 2. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, Tom and Childress, James. 2013. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, Tom and Childress, James. 1989. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, Tom and Childress, James. 1983. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bedell, Gary. 1980. “Has Peirce Refuted Egoism?” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 16:3, 255–275.Google Scholar
Beeson, Robert J. 2008. Peirce on the passions: The role of instinct, emotion, and sentiment in inquiry and action. Ph.D. dissertation. University of South Florida.Google Scholar
Bergman, Mats. 2010. “Serving Two Masters: Peirce on Pure Science, Useless Things, and Practical Applications.” In Ideas in Action: Proceedings of the Applying Peirce Conference. Eds. Bergman, M, Pietarinen, A.V., and Rydenfelt, H.. Nordic Studies in Pragmatism 1. Helsinki: Nordic Pragmatism Network, 17–37.Google Scholar
Black, Joshua. 2013. “Peirce on Habit, Practice, and Theory.” M.A. Thesis. University of Waikato. http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10289/7847/thesis.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y.Google Scholar
Bloom, Paul. 2010. “The Moral Life of Babies.” In New York Times Magazine. www.nytimes.com/2010/05/09/magazine/09babies-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0.Google Scholar
Boyd, Kenneth. 2012. “Levi’s Challenge and Peirce’s Theory/Practice Distinction.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 48:2, 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brent, Joseph. 1998. Charles S. Peirce: A Life. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D. 1950. “Egoism as a Theory of Human Motives.” The Hibbert Journal. 48, 105–114.Google Scholar
Campos, Daniel. 2014. “Peirce’s Prejudices against Hispanics and the Ethical Scope of His Philosophy.” The Pluralist. 9:2, 42–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campos, Daniel. 2011.“On the Distinction between Peirce’s Abduction and Lipton’s Inference to the Best Explanation.” Synthese. 180: 419–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clanton, J. Caleb. 2014. “The Structure of C. S. Peirce’s Neglected Argument for the Reality of God: A Critical Assessment.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 50:2, 175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colapietro, Vincent. 2007. “C. S. Peirce’s Rhetorical Turn.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 43:1, 16–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colapietro, Vincent. 2006. “Practice, Agency, & Solidarity: An Orthogonal Reading of Classical Pragmatism.” International Journal for Dialogical Science. 1:1, 23–31.Google Scholar
Colapietro, Vincent. 1998. “Transforming a Philosophy into a Science: A Debilitating Chimera or a Realizable Desideratum?” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly. 72:2, 245–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colapietro, Vincent. 1989. Peirce’s Approach to the Self: A Semiotic Perspective on Human Subjectivity. Buffalo: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Cudney, Paul. 2014. “What Really Separates Casuistry from Principlism in Biomedical Ethics.” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. 35, 205–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dancy, Jonathan. 2004. Ethics without Principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1870. The Origin of Species. New York: D. Appleton and Company.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1986/2001. “A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge.” In Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, William H. 1972. Peirce’s Epistemology. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. 2006. The God Delusion. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
de Waal, Cornelis. 2012. “Who’s Afraid of Charles Sanders Peirce?: Knocking Some Critical Common Sense into Moral Philosophy.” In The Normative Thought of Charles S. Peirce. Eds. de Waal, Cornelis and Skowroński, Krzysztof Piotr. New York: Fordham University Press, 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. 1971. “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.” Journal of Philosophy. 68, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, Paul. 2011. Peirce and the Threat of Nominalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavin, William J. 1980. “Peirce and the ‘Will to Believe.’” The Monist. 63:3, 342–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gert, Bernard. 2004. The Common Morality. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girel, Mathias. 2011. “Peirce’s Early Re-Readings of His Illustrations: The Case of the 1885 Royce Review.” Cognitio. 12:1, 75–88.Google Scholar
Hausman, Carl R. 1993. Charles S. Peirce’s Evolutionary Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Stephen B. 2007. “Desire and Natural Classification: Peirce and Aristotle on Final Cause.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 43:3, 521–541.Google Scholar
Helvétius, Claude Adrien. 1777. Treatise on Man, His Intellectual Faculties, and His Education. Trans. Hooper, W.. London: Law and Robinson.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1660/1994. Leviathan. Ed. Curley, Edwin. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Holmes, Larry. 1966. “Peirce on Self-Control.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 2:2, 113–130.Google Scholar
Hookway, Christopher. 2012. The Pragmatic Maxim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hookway, Christopher. 2000. Truth, Rationality, and Pragmatism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hornsby, Jennifer. 1997. “Truth: The Identity Theory.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 97, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howat, Andrew. 2014. “Peirce on Grounding the Laws of Logic.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 50:4, 480–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, Kathleen. 2005. “The Inner Chambers of His Mind: Peirce’s ‘Neglected Argument’ for God as Related to Mathematical Experience.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 41:3, 483–513.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. 1756. Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections with Illustration on the Moral Sense. 4th ed. London: Innys and Co.Google Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis. 1753. An Inquiry Concerning the Original of Our Ideas of Virtue and Moral Good. 5th ed. London: Ware and Knapton.Google Scholar
Isaiah, . 1973. In The New Oxford Annotated Bible. Ed. May, Herbert and Metzger, Bruce. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sr. James, Henry. 1863. Substance and Shadow. Boston: Ticknor and Fields.Google Scholar
Jonsen, Albert R. 1995. “Casuistry: An Alternative or Complement to Principles?” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 5:3, 237–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jonsen, Albert R. 1990. “Practice versus Theory.” Hastings Center Report. 20, 32–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonsen, Albert R. and Toulmin, Stephen. 1988. The Abuse of Casuistry. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jouffroy, Théodore. 1851. Introduction to Ethics, Including a Critical Survey of Moral Systems. Trans. Channing, William H.. Boston: James Munroe and Co.Google Scholar
Joyce, Richard. 2006. The Evolution of Morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Ed. Guyer, Paul. Trans. Guyer, Paul and Matthews, Eric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasser, Jeff. 1999. “Peirce’s Supposed Psychologism.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 35:3, 501–526.Google Scholar
Kent, Beverley. 1987. Charles S. Peirce: Logic and the Classification of the Sciences. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Kent, Beverley. 1976. “Peirce’s Esthetics: A New Look.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 12:3, 263–283.Google Scholar
Ketner, Kenneth Laine and Putnam, Hilary. 1992. “Consequences of Mathematics.” In Reasoning and the Logic of Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Khachab, Chihab El. 2013. “The Logical Goodness of Abduction.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 49:2, 157–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. 1986. “The Right to Lie: Kant on Dealing with Evil.” Philosophy and Public Affairs. 15:4, 325–349.Google Scholar
Kuczewski, Mark. 1998. “Casuistry and Principles: The Convergence of Method in Biomedical Ethics.” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. 19, 509–524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lane, Robert. 2009. “Persons, Signs, Animals: A Peircean Account of Personhood.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 45:1, 1–26.Google Scholar
Lane, Robert. 2007. “From Set Theory to Pragmaticism: Peirce’s Modal Shift.” Journal of the History of Philosophy. 45:4, 551–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Robert. 1999. “Peirce’s Triadic Logic Revisted.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 35:2, 284–311.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Martin. 2007. “Peirce’s Esthetics: A Taste for Signs in Art.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. Bloomington, 43:2, 319–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liszka, James. 2014. “Peirce’s Idea of Ethics as a Normative Science.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 50:4, 459–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liszka, James. 2012. “Charles S. Peirce on Ethics.” The Normative Thought of Charles S. Peirce. Eds. de Waal, Cornelis and Skowroński, Krzysztof Piotr. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. 1997. “The Linguistics of ‘Color.’” In Color Categories in Thought and Language. Eds. Hardin, C. L. and Luisa, Maffi. New York: Cambridge University Press, 320–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, Catherine. 1988. Unnatural Emotions: Everyday Sentiments on a Micronesian Atoll and Their Challenge to Western Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L. 1955. “Evil and Omnipotence.” Mind. 64:254, 200–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard. 1723/1997. The Fable of the Bees and Other Writings. Ed. Hundert, E. J.. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Massecar, Aaron. 2013. “The Fitness of an Ideal: A Peircean Ethics.” Contemporary Pragmatism. 10:2, 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayorga, Rosa Maria. 2012. “Peirce’s Moral ‘Realicism.’” In The Normative Thought of Charles S. Peirce. Eds. de Waal, Cornelis and Skowroński, Krzysztof Piotr. New York: Fordham University Press, 101–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKaughan, Daniel. 2008. “From Ugly Duckling to Swan: C. S. Peirce, Abduction, and the Pursuit of Scientific Theories.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 44:3, 446–468.Google Scholar
Migotti, Mark. 2005. “The Key to Peirce’s View of the Role of Belief in Scientific Inquiry.” Cognitio. 6:1, 44–55.Google Scholar
Migotti, Mark. 2004. “Critical Notice: Christopher Hookway, Truth, Rationality and Pragmatism.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 34:2, 287–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl. 2011. “American Pragmatism and Indispensability Arguments.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 47:3, 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl. 2004. “C. S. Peirce on Vital Matters.” In The Cambridge Companion to Peirce. Ed. Misak, Cheryl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 150–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl. 2000. Truth, Politics, Morality: Pragmatism and Deliberation. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niño, Douglas. 2009. “Peircean Pragmatism and Inference to the Best Explanation.” www.academia.edu/2046722/Peircean_Pragmatism_and_Inference_to_the_Best_Explanation_first_draft.Google Scholar
Noble, N. A. Brian. 1989. “Peirce’s Definitions of Continuity and the Concept of Possibility.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 25:2, 149–174.Google Scholar
Opie, Amelia Alderson. 1825. Illustrations of Lying. 2 vols. London: Longman, Hurst, Kees, Orme, Brown, and Green.Google Scholar
Orange, Donna. 1980. The Development of Peirce’s Theism. Ph.D. dissertation. Fordham University.Google Scholar
Paavola, Sami. 2005. “Peircean Abduction: Instinct or Inference?” Semiotica. 153:1/4, 131–154.Google Scholar
Pape, Helmut. 2012. “Self-Control, Values, and Moral Development: Peirce on the Value-driven Dynamics of Human Morality.” The Normative Thought of Charles S. Peirce. Eds. de Waal, Cornelis and Skowroński, Krzysztof Piotr. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Kelly A. 1998. The Continuity of Peirce’s Thought. Nashville: Vanderbilt.Google Scholar
Petry, Edward S. 1992. “The Origin and Development of Peirce’s Concept of Self-Control.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 43:3, 667–690.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. 2000. Warranted Christian Belief. New York: Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, Vincent G. 1967. Charles S. Peirce on Norms and Ideals. Worcester: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Raposa, Michael. 1989. Peirce’s Philosophy of Religion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew. 2002. Peirce’s Scientific Metaphysics: The Philosophy of Chance, Law, and Evolution. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Robert J. 1987. Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robin, Richard. 1967. Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Robin, Richard. 1971. “The Peirce Papers: A Supplementary Catalogue.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 7:1, 37–57.Google Scholar
Rohaytn, Dennis. 1982. “Resurrecting Peirce’s “Neglected Argument” for God’s Reality.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 18:1, 66–74.Google Scholar
Rowe, William. 1979. “The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism.” American Philosophical Quarterly. 16:4, 335–341.Google Scholar
Savan, David. 1981. “Peirce’s Semiotic Theory of Emotion.” In Proceedings of the Charles S. Peirce Bicentennial international Congress. Ed. Ketner, Kenneth Laine, et al. 319–333.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Gary. 1973. “Habit and Meaning in Peirce’s Pragmatism.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 9:1, 24–40.Google Scholar
Short, T. L. 2007. Peirce’s Theory of Signs. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry. 1884. The Methods of Ethics. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Smith, C. M. 1972. “The Esthetics of Charles S. Peirce.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 31:1, 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, John E. 1983. “The Tension between Direct Experience and Argument in Religion.” Religious Studies. 17, 487–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 1992. “Hedonism and Butler’s Stone.” Ethics. 103:1, 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 1989. “What Is Psychological Egoism?” Behaviorism. 17:2, 89–102.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. 1852. “A Theory of Population.” The Westminster Review. Vol. 57/8. New York: Leonard, Scott, and Co.Google Scholar
Stjernfelt, Frederick. 2014. Natural Propositions. Boston: Docent Press.Google Scholar
Talisse, Robert B. 2007. A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1964. Summa Theologiae. Vol. 2. Trans. McDermott, Timothy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. H. 1953. The Pragmatic Philosophy of C. S. Peirce. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tillich, Paul. 1951. Systematic Theology. Vol. 1. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Trammell, Richard L. 1973. “Charles Sanders Peirce and Henry James the Elder.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 9:4, 202–220.Google Scholar
Trammell, Richard L. 1972. “Religion, Instinct, and Reason in the Thought of C. S. Peirce.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 8:1, 3–25.Google Scholar
Trout, Lara. 2010. The Politics of Survival: Peirce, Affectivity, and Social Criticism. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turrisi, Patricia Ann. 1986. Charles S. Peirce’s Evolutionary Metaphysics: The Growth of Reasonableness in Nature, Mind and Science. Ph.D. dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Welchman, Jennifer. 2006. “William James’s ‘The Will to Believe’ and the Ethics of Self-Experimentation.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 42: 2, 229–241.Google Scholar
Westrbrook, Robert B. 2005. Democratic Hope: Pragmatism and the Politics of Truth. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1985/1993. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Richard Atkins, Boston College, Massachusetts
  • Book: Peirce and the Conduct of Life
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316676240.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Richard Atkins, Boston College, Massachusetts
  • Book: Peirce and the Conduct of Life
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316676240.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Richard Atkins, Boston College, Massachusetts
  • Book: Peirce and the Conduct of Life
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316676240.008
Available formats
×