Acuto, M., ‘High-rise Dubai urban entrepreneurialism and the technology of symbolic power’, Cities, vol. 27, no. 4, 2010, 272–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, W., ‘The military-industrial complex and the new industrial state’, American Economic Review, vol. 58, no. 2, 1968, 652–65.Google Scholar

Ahiaga-Dagbui, D. D. and Smith, S. D., ‘Rethinking construction cost overruns: Cognition, learning and estimation’, Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, vol. 19, no. 1, 2014, 38–54.Google Scholar

Ahuja, G., Morris Lampert, C., and Novelli, E., ‘The second face of appropriability: Generative appropriability and its determinants’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 38, no. 2, 2013, 248–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aibinu, A. and Jagboro, G., ‘The effects of construction delays on project delivery in Nigeria Construction industry’, International Journal of Project Management, vol. 20, no. 8, 202, 593–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akerlof, G. A. and Shiller, R. J., Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Akintoye, A., ‘Analysis of factors influencing project cost estimation practice’, Construction Management and Economics, vol. 18, no. 1, 2000, 77–89.Google Scholar

Allen, J. M. and Norris, K. P., ‘Project estimates and outcomes in the electricity generation research’, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 7, October 1970, 271–87.Google Scholar

Alptekin, A. and Levine, P., ‘Military expenditure and economic growth: A meta-analysis’, European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 28, no. 4, 2012, 636–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altshuler, A. and Luberoff, D., Mega-Projects: The Changing Politics of Urban Public Investment, Washington DC: Brooking Institute, 2003.Google Scholar

Andersson, B. and Welde, K. S. M., ‘Low estimates – high stakes: Underestimation of costs at the front-end of projects’, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, vol. 9, no. 1, 2016, 171–93.Google Scholar

Anheier, H. K., ed., When Things Go Wrong: Organizational Failures and Breakdowns, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1999.Google Scholar

Arabsheibani, G., de Meza, D., Maloney, J., and Pearson, B., ‘And a vision appeared unto them of a great profit: Evidence of self-deception among the self-employed’, Economic Letters, vol. 67, no. 1, 2000, 35–41.Google Scholar

Arditi, D., Akan, G. T., and Gurdamar, S., ‘Cost overruns in public projects’, Project Management, vol. 3, no. 4, 1985, 218–24.Google Scholar

Arena, M. V., Blickstein, I., Younossi, O., and Grammich, C. A., Why Has the Cost of Navy Ships Risen? A Macroscopic Examination of the Trends in US Naval Ship Costs over the Past Several Decades, Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2006.Google Scholar

Arena, M. V., Younossi, O., Brancato, K., Blickstein, I., and Grammich, C. A., Why Has the Cost of Fixed-Wing Aircraft Risen? A Macroscopic Examination of the Trends in US Military Aircraft Cost over the past Several Decades, Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2008.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J., ‘Functions of a theory of behavior under uncertainty’, Metroeconomica, vol. 11, no. 1–2, 1959, 12–20.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J., ‘Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention’, in Nelson, R., ed., The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962, pp. 609–26.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J., ‘Limited knowledge and economic analysis’, American Economic Review, vol. 64, no. 1, 1974, 1–10.Google Scholar

Arrow, K. J. and Lind, R. C., ‘Uncertainty and the evaluation of public investment decisions’, American Economic Review, vol. 60, no. 3, 1970, 364–78.Google Scholar

Arthur, B. W., ‘Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events’, Economic Journal, vol. 99, no. 394, 1989, 116–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arvan, L. and Leite, A. P. N., ‘Cost overruns in long term projects’, International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol. 8, no. 3, 1990, 443–67.Google Scholar

Ashraf, N., Camerer, C. F., and Loewenstein, G., ‘Adam Smith, behavioral economist’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 19, no. 3, 2005, 131–45.Google Scholar

Asp, K., Mäktiga massmedier: Studier av politisk opinionsbildning, Stockholm: Akademilitteratur, 1986.Google Scholar

Assaf, S. and Al-Hejji, S., ‘Causes of delay in large construction projects’, International Journal of Project Management, vol. 24, no. 4, 2006, 349–57.Google Scholar

Baccarini, D., ‘The concept of project complexity: A review’, International Journal of Project Management, vol. 14, no. 4, 1996, 201–4.Google Scholar

Baldwin, C. Y. and Clark, K. B., Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, C. Y. and Henkel, J., ‘Modularity and intellectual property protection’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 36, no. 11, 2015, 1637–55.Google Scholar

Baldwin, C. Y. and Woodard, C. J., ‘The architecture of platforms: A unified view’, in Gawer, A., ed., Platforms, Markets and Innovation, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, US: Edward Elgar, 2009, pp. 19–44.Google Scholar

Baron, R. A., ‘Conterfactual thinking and venture formation: The potential effects of thinking about “what might have been”’, Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 15, no. 1, 1999, 79–91.Google Scholar

Bart, C. K., ‘Budgeting gamesmanship’, Academy of Management Executive, vol. 2, no. 4, 1988, 285–94.Google Scholar

Bazerman, M. H., Judgement in Managerial Decision-Making, 2nd edn, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1990.Google Scholar

Bazerman, M. H., Loewenstein, G., and Moore, D. A., ‘Why good accountants do bad audits’, Harvard Business Review, vol. 97, no. 6, 2002.Google Scholar

Bazerman, M. H., Morgan, K. P., and Loewenstein, G. F., ‘The impossibility of auditor independence’, MIT Sloan Management Review, vol. 38, no. 4, 89–94.Google Scholar

Bechara, A., ‘The role of emotion in decision-making: Evidence from neurological patients with orbitofrontal damage’, Brain and Cognition, vol. 55, no. 1, 2004, 30–40.Google Scholar

Becker, E., The Denial of Death, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1973.Google Scholar

Becker, G. S., Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Beenhakker, H. L. and Danskin, J. G., ‘Economies of stage construction for transport facilities’, Transportation Research, vol. 7, no. 2, 1973, 163–78.Google Scholar

Bengtsson, U., Stora investeringar i mindre kommuner: Scope, scale och stage construction som strategier, Göteborg: BAS, 2013.Google Scholar

Beniger, J. R., The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Bennet, W. L., ‘The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 644, no. 1, 2012, 20–39.Google Scholar

Bergeron, B. and St-Arnaud, J.-Y., ‘Estimation of information systems development efforts: A pilot study’, Information & Management, vol. 22, no. 4, 1992, 239–54.Google Scholar

Bernstein, J. I. and Nadiri, M. I., ‘Interindustry R&D spillovers, rate of return, and production in high-tech industries’, American Economic Review, vol. 78, no. 2, 1988, 429–34.Google Scholar

Berthélemy, M. and Escobar Rangel, L., ‘Nuclear reactors’ construction costs: The role of lead-time, standardization and technological progress’, Energy Policy, vol. 82, July 2015, 118–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertisen, J. and Davis, G. A., ‘Bias and error in mine project capital cost estimation’, The Engineering Economist, vol. 53, no. 2, 2008, 118–39.Google Scholar

Bleiker, R. and Hutchison, E., ‘Fear no more: Emotions and world politics’, Review of International Studies, vol. 34, Supplement S1, 2008, 115–35.Google Scholar

Bloch, M., Blumberg, S., and Laartz, J., ‘Delivering large-scale IT projects on time, on budget, and on value’, McKinsey Quarterly, October 2012.Google Scholar

Boccard, N., ‘The cost of nuclear electricity: France after Fukushima’, Energy Policy, vol. 66, March 2014, 450–61.Google Scholar

Boehm, B. W. Software Engineering Economics, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1981.Google Scholar

Bolton, J. G., Leonard, R. S., Arena, M. V., Younossi, O., and Sollinger, J. M., Sources of Weapon System Cost Growth: Analysis of 35 Major Defense Acquisition Programs, Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bovens, M., The Quest for Responsibility: Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Bower, J. L., Managing the Resource Allocation Process: A Study of Corporate Planning and Investment, Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1970.Google Scholar

Bower, J. L., ‘Planning within the firm’, American Economic Review, vol. 60, no. 2, 1970, 186–94.Google Scholar

Bower, J. L. and Gilbert, C. G., eds., From Resource Allocation to Strategy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Brandy, T., Davies, A., and Nightingale, P., ‘Dealing with uncertainty in complex projects: Revisiting Klein and Meckling’, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, vol. 5, no. 4, 2012, 718–36.Google Scholar

Brigelius, L. and Rosén, P., Risk och Försäkring, Göteborg: BAS, 1988.Google Scholar

Brockner, J., Houser, R., Birnbaum, G., Lloyd, K., Deitcher, J., Nathanson, S., and Rubin, J. Z., ‘Escalation of commitment to an ineffective course of action: The effect of feedback having negative implications for self-identity’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 1, 1986, 109–26.Google Scholar

Brown, L. D., ‘Analyst forecasting errors: Additional evidence’, Financial Analysts Journal, vol. 53, no. 6, 1997, 81–7.Google Scholar

Brüggen, A. and Luft, J. L., ‘Capital rationing, competition, and misrepresentation in budget forecasts’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 36, no. 7, 2011, 399–411.Google Scholar

Brüggen, A. and Luft, J. L., ‘Cost estimates, cost overrun, and project continuation decisions’, Accounting Review, vol. 91, no. 3, 2016, 793–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burke, B. L. and Faucher, E. H., ‘Two decades of terror management theory: A meta-analysis of mortality salience research’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, vol. 14, no. 2, 2010, 155–95.Google Scholar

Busenitz, L. W. and Barney, J. B., ‘Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making’, Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 12, no. 1, 1997, 9–30.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M., ‘Evolutionary personality psychology’, Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 42, February 1991, 459–91.Google Scholar

Calisir, F. and Gumussoy, C. A., ‘Determinants of budget overruns on IT-projects’, Technovation, vol. 25, no. 6, 2005, 631–6.Google Scholar

Callen, R. C., ‘Congress’s nuclear waste “contract with America”: Where do we go from here?’, Electricity Journal, vol. 8, no. 5, 1995, 45–55.Google Scholar

Cancian, M. F., ‘Cost growth: Perception and reality’, A Publication of the Defense Acquisition University, July 2010, 389–403.Google Scholar

Cantarelli, C. C., Flyvbjerg, B., and Buhl, S. L., ‘Geographical variation in project cost performance: The Netherlands versus worldwide’, Journal of Transportation Geography, vol. 24, 2012, 324–31.Google Scholar

Cantarelli, C. C., Flyvbjerg, B., Molin, E. J. E., and van Wee, B., ‘Cost overruns in large-scale transportation infrastructure projects: Explanations and their theoretical embeddedness’, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, vol. 10, no. 1, 2010, 5–18.Google Scholar

Cantarelli, C. C., Molin, E. J. E., van Wee, B., and Flyvbjerg, B., ‘Characteristics of cost overruns for Dutch transport infrastructure projects and the importance of the decision to build and project phases’, Transport Policy, vol. 22, 2012, 49–56.Google Scholar

Cantarelli, C. C., van Wee, B., Molin, E. J. E., and Flyvbjerg, B., ‘Different cost performance: Different determinants? The case of cost overruns in Dutch transport infrastructure projects’, Transport Policy, vol. 22, 2012, 88–95.Google Scholar

Carlsson, B. and Nachemson-Ekwall, S., Livsfarlig ledning: Historien om kraschen i ABB, Stockholm: Ekerlids, 2003.Google Scholar

Carson, R. L., Silent Spring, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1962.Google Scholar

Castillo, J., Lowell, J., Tellis, A. J., Muñoz, J., and Zycher, B., Military Expenditures and Economic Growth, Santa Monica: RAND, 2001.Google Scholar

Certo, S. T., Connelly, B. L., and Tihanyi, L., ‘Managers and their not-so rational decisions’, Business Horizons, vol. 51, no. 2, 2008, 113–19.Google Scholar

Chandler, A. D. Jr., Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Chen, Y., and Smith, R., ‘Equilibrium cost overruns’, Annals of Economics and Finance, vol. 2, no. 2, 2001, 401–14.Google Scholar

Christensen, D. S., ‘An analysis of cost overruns on defense acquisition contracts’, Project Management Journal, vol. 24, no. 3, 1993, 43–8.Google Scholar

Christensen, D. S., ‘Cost overrun optimism: Fact or fiction?’, Acquisition Review Quarterly, vol. 1, Winter 1994, 25–38.Google Scholar

Christensen, D. S., ‘Project advocacy and the estimate at completion problem’, Journal of Cost Analysis, vol. 13, no. 1, 1996, 35–60.Google Scholar

Christensen, D. S., Searle, D. A., and Vickery, C., ‘The impact of the Packard Commission’s recommendation on reducing cost overruns on defense acquisition contracts’, Acquisition Review Quarterly, vol. 6, Summer 1999, 251–62.Google Scholar

Clark, F. D. and Lorenzoni, A. B., Applied Cost Engineering, 3rd edn., New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clements, K. W. and Si, J., ‘The investment project pipeline: Cost escalation, lead time, success, failure and speed’, Australian Journal of Management, vol. 36, no. 3, 2011, 317–48.Google Scholar

Coe, D. T. and Helpman, E., ‘International R&D spillovers’, European Economic Review, vol. 39, no. 5, 859–87.Google Scholar

Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., and Olsen, J. P., ‘A garbage can model of organizational choice’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 1, 1972, 1–25.Google Scholar

Conrad, J., The Secret Agent, Leipzig: Bernhard Tauchnitz, 1907.Google Scholar

Conti, R., Gambardella, A., and Novelli, E., ‘Research on markets for inventions and implications for R&D allocation strategies’, Academy of Management Annals, vol. 7, no. 1, 2014, 717–74.Google Scholar

Cooper, A. C., Dunkelberg, W. C., and Woo, C. Y., ‘Optimists and pessimists: 2994 entrepreneurs and their perceived chances for success’, in Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Wellesley: Babson College, 1986, pp. 563–77.Google Scholar

Cooper, M., Policy Challenges of Nuclear Reactor Construction: Cost Escalation and Crowding Out Alternatives. Lessons from the US and France for the Effort to Revive the US Industry with Loan Guarantees and Tax Subsidies, South Royalton: Vermont Law School, September 2010.Google Scholar

Coricelli, G., Dolan, R. J., and Sirigu, A., ‘Brain, emotion and decision making: The paradigmatic example of regret’, Trends in Cognitive Science, vol. 11, no. 6, 2007, 258–65.Google Scholar

Crowley, J. H., Nuclear energy: What’s next? Monterey, CA: The work shop on the electric imperative atomic industrial forum Inc., 14–17 June 1981.Google Scholar

Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G., A Behavioural Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1963.Google Scholar

Daniel, K. and Hirshleifer, D., ‘Overconfident investors, predictable returns, and excessive trading’, Journal of Economic Perspective, vol. 29, no. 4, 2015, 61–87.Google Scholar

Davies, N., Eager, A., Maier, M. and Penfold, L., Intergenerational equipment cost escalation, A Ministry of Defence economic research paper on the increasing cost of UK defence equipment, Ministry of Defence, 18 December 2012.Google Scholar

Davies, A. and Hobday, M., The Business of Projects: Managing Innovation in Complex Products and Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Davis, D., ‘New projects: Beware of false economies’, Harvard Business Review, vol. 63, no. 2, 1985, 95–101.Google Scholar

Davis, G. F., Managed by the Markets: How Finance Reshaped America, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Denison, C. A., ‘Real options and escalation of commitment: A behavioral analysis of capital investment decisions’, The Accounting Review, vol. 84, no. 1, 2009, 133–55.Google Scholar

Didion, J., Political Fictions, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2001.Google Scholar

Dixit, A. K. and Pindyck, S. R., The Options Approach to Capital Investments, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Doloi, H. K., ‘Understanding stakeholders’ perspective of cost estimation in project management’, International Journal of Project Management, vol. 29, no. 5, 2011, 622–36.Google Scholar

Dörner, D., The Logic of Failure: Recognizing and Avoiding Error in Complex Situations, New York: Metropolitan Books, 1996.Google Scholar

Douglas, M. and Wildavsky, A. B., Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Doukas, J. A. and Petmezas, D., ‘Acquisitions, overconfident managers and self-attribution bias’, European Financial Management, vol. 13, no. 3, 2007, 531–77.Google Scholar

Dreman, D. N. and Berry, M. A., ‘Analyst forecasting errors and their implications for security analysis’, Financial Analysts Journal, vol. 51, no. 3, 1995, 30–40.Google Scholar

Drory, A. and Romm, T., ‘The definition of organizational politics: A review’, Human Relations, vol. 43, no. 11, 1990, 1133–54.Google Scholar

Eden, C., Williams, T., and Ackermann, F., ‘Analysing project cost overruns: Comparing the “measured mile” analysis and system dynamics modelling’, International Journal of Project Management, vol. 23, no. 2, 2005, 135–9.Google Scholar

Eden, C., Ackermann, F., and Williams, T., ‘The amoebic growth of project costs’, Project Management Journal, vol. 36, no. 1, 2005, 15–27.Google Scholar

Egge, K. A., ‘Expectations vs. reality among founders of recent start-ups’, in Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Wellesley: Babson College, 1992, pp. 322–36.Google Scholar

Ehrlinger, J., Johnson, K., Banner, M., Dunning, D., and Kruger, J., ‘Why the unskilled are unaware: Further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 105, no. 1, 2008, 98–121.Google Scholar

Elam, M. and Sundqvist, G., ‘Meddling in Swedish success in nuclear waste management’, Environmental Politics, vol. 20, no. 2, 2011, 246–63.Google Scholar

Eliasson, J. and Fosgerau, M., ‘Cost overruns and demand shortfalls: Deception or selection?’, Transportation Research Part B, vol. 57, 2013, 105–13.Google Scholar

Eliasson, J. and Fosgerau, M., Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 57, November 2013, 105–13.Google Scholar

Elster, J., ‘Emotions and economic theory’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 36, no. 1, 1998, 47–74.Google Scholar

Engwall, M., ‘The futile dream of the perfect goal’, in Sahlin-Andersson, K. and Söderholm, L., eds., Beyond Project Management, Malmö: Daleke Grafiska, 2002, pp. 161–77.Google Scholar

Ericsson, J. C., Utan omsvep: Mitt berikande liv med Consafe, Stockholm: Timbro, 1987.Google Scholar

Eriksson, J., Coping with Decisions on Deviations in Complex Product Development Projects, Västerås: Mälardalen University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Eriksson, O., Tre stora industriella investeringar: Om investeringskalkyleringens bristande ändamålsenlighet vid stora investeringar, Västerås: Mälardalen University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Ernst and Young, Spotlight on oil and gas megaprojects, 2014: available from www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-spotlight-on-oil-and-gas-megaprojects/$FILE/EY-spotlight-on-oil-and-gas-megaprojects.pdfGoogle Scholar

Eveleens, J. L., van der Pas, P., and Verhoef, C., ‘Quantifying forecast quality of IT business value’, Science of Computer Programming, vol. 77, no. 3, 2012, 314–54.Google Scholar

Eveleens, J. L. and Verhoef, C., ‘The rise and fall of the Chaos report figures’, IEEE Software, vol. 27, no. 1, 2008, 30–6.Google Scholar

Fabricius, G. and Büttgen, M., ‘Project managers’ overconfidence: How is risk reflected in anticipated project success’, Business Research, vol. 8, no. 2, 2015, 239–63.Google Scholar

Federle, M. O. and Pigneri, S. C., ‘Predictive models of cost overruns’, Annual Meeting American Association of Cost Engineers, 1993 AACE Transactions, 1993, L.7.1–9.Google Scholar

Fischhendler, I., Cohen-Blankshtain, G., Shuali, Y., and Boykoff, M., ‘Communicating mega-projects in the face of uncertainties: Israeli mass media treatment of the Dead Sea Water Canal’, Public Understanding of Science, vol. 24, no. 7, 2015, 794–810.Google Scholar

Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Keeney, R., and Derby, S., Acceptable Risk, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Fleischman, R. K. and Tyson, T. N., ‘The evolution of standard costing in the UK and US: From decision making to control’, Abacus, vol. 34, no. 1, 1998, 92–119.Google Scholar

Fleischman, R. K. and Tyson, T. N., ‘The history of management accounting in the US’, in Chapman, C. S., Hopwood, A. G., and Shields, M. D., eds., Handbook of Management Accounting Research, Volume 2, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007, pp. 1071–89.Google Scholar

Flinders, M., ‘In defence of politics’, Political Quarterly, vol. 81, no. 3, 2010, 309–25.Google Scholar

Flyvbjerg, B., ‘From Nobel Prize to project management: Getting risks right’, Project Management Journal, vol. 37, no. 3, 2006, 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flyvbjerg, B., ‘Curbing optimism bias and strategic misrepresentation in planning: Reference class forecasting in practice’, European Planning Studies, vol. 16, no. 1, 2008, 3–21.Google Scholar

Flyvbjerg, B., ‘Cost overruns and demand shortfalls in urban rail and other infrastructure’, Transportation Planning and Technology, vol. 30, no. 1, 2008, 9–30.Google Scholar

Flyvbjerg, B., ‘Over budget, over time, over and over again’, in Morris, P. W., Pinto, J. K., and Söderlund, J., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Project Management, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 321–44.Google Scholar

Flyvbjerg, B., ‘How planners deal with uncomfortable knowledge: The dubious ethics of the American Planning Association’, Cities, vol. 32, June 2013, 157–63.Google Scholar

Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., and Rothengatter, W., Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Flyvbjerg, B. and Budzier, A., ‘Why your IT project may be riskier than you think’, Harvard Business Review, vol. 89, no. 9, 2011, 23–5.Google Scholar

Flyvbjerg, B., Garvuio, M., and Lovallo, D., ‘Delusion and deception in large infrastructure projects: Two models for explaining and preventing executive disaster’, California Management Review, vol. 51, no. 2, 2009, 170–93.Google Scholar

Flyvbjerg, B., Skamris Holm, M., and Buhl, S., ‘Underestimating costs in public works projects: Error or lie’, Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 68, no. 3, 2002, 279–95.Google Scholar

Flyvbjerg, B., Skamris Holm, M., and Buhl, S., ‘How common and how large are cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects?’, Transport Review, vol. 23, no. 1, 2003, 71–88.Google Scholar

Flyvbjerg, B., Skamris Holm, M., and Buhl, S., ‘What causes cost overrun in transport infrastructure projects?’, Transport Review, vol. 24, no. 1, 2004, 3–18.Google Scholar

Flyvbjerg, B. and Stewart, A., Olympic proportions: Cost and cost overrun at the Olympics 1960–2012, Oxford: Saïd Business School working papers, June 2012.Google Scholar

Forsyth, D. R., ‘Self-serving bias’, in Darity, W. A., ed., International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 7, 2nd edn., New York: Macmillan Reference, 2008, p. 429.Google Scholar

Freeman, C., The Economics of Industrial Innovation, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1974.Google Scholar

Freeman, C. and Louçã, F., As Time Goes By: From the Industrial Revolutions to the Information Revolution, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Freeman, C. and Soete, L., The Economics of Industrial Innovation, 3rd edn., London and New York: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar

Galbraith, C. S. and Merrill, G. B., ‘The politics of forecasting: Managing the truth’, California Management Review, vol. 38, no. 2, 1996, 29–43.Google Scholar

Gaspar, V. and Leite, A. P. N., ‘Selection bias induced cost overruns’, Information Economics and Policy, vol. 4, no. 2, 1989/90, 175–87.Google Scholar

Gavetti, G., Levinthal, D., and Ocasio, W., ‘Neo-Carnegie: The Carnegie School’s past, present, and reconstructing for the future’, Organization Science, vol. 18, no. 3, 2007, 523–36.Google Scholar

van Genuchten, M., ‘Why is software late? An empirical study of reasons for delay in software development’, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 17, no. 6, 1991, 582–90.Google Scholar

Giguet, R. and Morlat, G., ‘Les causes d’erreur systématique dans la prévision du prix des travaux’, Annales des Ponts et Chausssées. Mémoires et documents relatifs à l’art des constructions et au service de l’ingénieur, vol. 122, no. 5, 1952, 543–62.Google Scholar

Glennan, T. K. Jr., ‘Issues in the choice of development policies’, in Marschak, T., Glennan, T. K. Jr., and Summers, R., eds., Strategies for R&D: Studies in the Microeconomics of Development, Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1967, pp. 13–48.Google Scholar

Goold, M. and Campbell, A., Strategies and Styles: The Role of the Centre in Managing Diversified Corporations, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987.Google Scholar

Government Accountability Office, Lesson Learned from Constructing the Trans-Alaska Oil Pipeline, Report to the Congress by the Comptroller General of the United States, EMD-78–52, Washington DC: General Accounting Office, 1978.Google Scholar

Government Accountability Office, Status of Major Acquisitions as of September 30 1982, GAO/NS IAD-83–32, Washington DC: General Accounting Office, 1983.Google Scholar

Government Accountability Office, Major Acquisitions – Summary of Recurring Problems and Systemic Issues: 1960–1987, Briefing Report to the Chairman, Committee on Armed Services, GAO/NSIAD-88-135BR, Washington DC: General Accounting Office, 1988.Google Scholar

Government Accountability Office, Nuclear Waste: Technical, Schedule, and Cost Uncertainties of the Yucca Mountain Repository Project, Report to Congressional Requesters, GAO-02–191, Washington DC: General Accounting Office, 2001.Google Scholar

Government Accountability Office, Nuclear Waste: Uncertainties About the Yucca Mountain Repository Project, Testimony Before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, GAO-02-765T, Washington DC: General Accounting Office, 2002.Google Scholar

Government Accountability Office, Department of Energy: Status of Contract and Project Management Reforms, Testimony Before the Committee on Government Reforms, GAO-03-570T, Washington DC: General Accounting Office, 2003.Google Scholar

Government Accountability Office, Nuclear Regulation. NRC Needs More Effective Analysis to Ensure Accumulation of Funds to Decommission Nuclear Power Plants, Report to the Honorable Markey, Edward J., Report GAO-04–32, Washington DC: General Accounting Office, 2004.Google Scholar

Grampp, W., ‘Adam Smith and the Economic Man’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 56, no. 4, 1948, 315–36.Google Scholar

Granstrand, O. and Sjölander, S., ‘Managing innovation in multi-technology corporations’, Research Policy, vol. 19, no. 1, 1990, 35–60.Google Scholar

Granstrand, O., Bohlin, E., Oskarsson, C., and Sjöberg, N., ‘External technology acquisition in large multi-technology corporations’, R&D Management, vol. 22, no. 2, 1992, 111–33.Google Scholar

Grant, R. and Keohane, R. O., ‘Accountability and abuses of power in world politics’, American Political Science Review, vol. 99, no. 1, 2005, 29–43.Google Scholar

Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., and Solomon, S., ‘The causes and consequences of a need for self-esteem: A terror management theory’, in Baumeister, R. F., ed., Public Self and Private Self, New York: Springer Verlag, 1986, pp. 189–212.Google Scholar

Griliches, Z., ‘Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth’, Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 10, no. 1, 1979, 92–116.Google Scholar

Grubb, M. D., ‘Overconfident consumers in the marketplace’, Journal of Economic Perspective, vol. 29, no. 4, 2015, 9–35.Google Scholar

Grubler, A., ‘The costs of the French nuclear scale-up: A case of negative learning by doing’, Energy Policy, vol. 38, no. 9, 2010, 5174–88.Google Scholar

Hägg, I., ‘Reviews of capital investments: Empirical studies’, Finnish Journal of Business Economics, vol. 28, no. 3, 1979, 211–25.Google Scholar

Haidt, J., The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion, New York: Pantheon Books, 2012.Google Scholar

Hall, P., Great Planning Disasters, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1980.Google Scholar

Hällgren, M., Avvikelsens mekanismer: Observationer av projekt i praktiken. Umeå: Umeå University, 2009.Google Scholar

Hällgren, M., ‘Mechanisms of deviations: Observations of projects in practice’, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, vol. 2, no. 4, 2009, 611–25.Google Scholar

Hällgren, M. and Maaninen-Olsson, E., ‘Deviations and the breakdown of project management principles’, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, vol. 2, no. 1, 2009, 53–69.Google Scholar

Hällgren, M. and Söderholm, A., ‘Orchestrating deviations in global projects: Projects-as-practice observations’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, vol. 26, no. 4, 2010, 352–67.Google Scholar

Hardin, G., ‘The tragedy of the commons’, Science, vol. 162, 13 December 1968, 1243–48.Google Scholar

Harris, M., Cannibals and Kings: The Origin of Cultures, New York: Random House, 1977.Google Scholar

Hauck, V. E. and Geistauts, G. A., ‘Construction of the trans-Alaska oil pipeline’, Omega, vol. 10, no. 3, 1982, 259–65.Google Scholar

Heemstra, F. J., ‘Software cost estimation’, Information and Software Technology, vol. 34, no. 10, 1992, 627–39.Google Scholar

Henderson, P. D., ‘Two British Errors: Their probable size and some possible lessons’, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 28, July 1977, 159–205.Google Scholar

Higgins, H. N., ‘Analyst forecasting performance in seven countries’, Financial Analysts Journal, vol. 54, no. 3, 1998, 58–62.Google Scholar

von Hippel, W. and Trivers, R., ‘The evolution and psychology of self-deception’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 34, February 2011, 1–56.Google Scholar

Hirschman, A. O., Development Projects Observed, Washington DC: The Brookings Institution, 1967.Google Scholar

Hjarvard, S. ‘The mediatisation of society. A theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change’, Nordicom Review, vol. 29, no. 2, 2008, 105–34.Google Scholar

Hogarth, R. M., ‘Beyond discrete biases: Functional and dysfunctional aspects of judgemental heuristics’, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 90, no. 2, 1981, 197–217.Google Scholar

Hogarth, R. M. and Makridakis, S., ‘Forecasting and planning: An evaluation’, Management Science, vol. 27, no. 2, 1981, 115–38.Google Scholar

Högselius, P., ‘Spent nuclear fuel policies in historical perspective: An international comparison’, Energy Policy, vol. 37, no. 1, 2009, 254–63.Google Scholar

Hollmann, J. K., ed., Total Cost Management Framework: An Integrated Approach to Portfolio, Program, and Project Management, 1st edn. revised, Morgantown: AACE International, The Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering, 2012.Google Scholar

Hopwood, A. G., Accounting and Human Behaviour, Egelwood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1976.Google Scholar

Hornaday, J. A., ‘Research about living entrepreneurs’, in Kent, C. A., Sexton, D. L., and Vesper, K. L., eds., Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, Engelwood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1982, pp. 281–90.Google Scholar

Hove, K. and Lillekvelland, T., ‘Investment cost escalation: An overview of the literature and revised estimates’, Defence and Peace Economics, vol. 27, no. 2, 2015, 208–30.Google Scholar

Hufschmidt, M. M., ‘Benefit-cost analysis, 1933-1985’, Water Resources Update, vol. 116, no. 1, 2000, 42–9.Google Scholar

Hufschmidt, M. M. and Gerin, J., ‘Systematic errors in cost estimates for public investment projects’, in Margolis, J., ed., The Analysis of Public Output, New York: Columbia University Press, 1970, pp. 267–315.Google Scholar

Hutchison, E. and Bleiker, R., ‘Theorizing emotions in world politics’, International Theory, vol. 6, no. 3, 2014, 491–514.Google Scholar

Ingvarsson Munthe, C., Uppvall, L., Engwall, M., and Dahlén, L., ‘Dealing with the devil of deviation: Managing uncertainty during product development execution’, R&D Management, vol. 44, no. 2, 2014, 203–16.Google Scholar

International Energy Agency, Projected Costs of Generating Electricity, 2010 Edition, Paris: International Energy Agency, 2010.Google Scholar

Jacobsson, B., Kraftsamling: Politik och företagande i parallella processer, Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1994.Google Scholar

Jaffe, A., ‘Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D’, American Economic Review, vol. 76, no. 5, 1986, 984–1001.Google Scholar

Jamieson, D., ‘Scientific uncertainty and the political process’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 545, May 1996, 35–43.Google Scholar

Janis, I. L., Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign Policy Decisions and Fiascoes, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972.Google Scholar

Jenkins, A. M., Naumann, J. D., and Wetherbe, J. C., ‘Empirical investigation of systems development practices and results’, Information & Management, vol. 7, no. 2, 1984, 73–82.Google Scholar

Jenpanitsub, A., Cost Overruns in Transport Projects: Experience from Sweden, Master of Science Thesis, Stockholm: The Royal Institute of Technology, 2011.Google Scholar

Jones, L. R. and Euske, K. J., ‘Strategic misrepresentation in budgeting’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 1, no. 4, 1991, 437–60.Google Scholar

Jones, P., Ove Arup: Masterbuilder of the Twentieth Century, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Jones, P., ‘Ove Arup: The outsider and the art of the impossible’, in Powell, K., ed., The Great Builders, London: Thames & Hudson, 2011, pp. 217–22.Google Scholar

Jørgensen, M., Halkjelsvik, T., and Kitchenham, B., ‘How does project size affect cost estimation error? Statistical artifacts and methodological challenges’, International Journal of Project Management, vol. 30, no. 7, 2012, 839–49.Google Scholar

Jørgensen, M. and Molökken, K., How large are software cost overruns? Critical comments on the Standish Group’s CHAOS Reports, Working paper, 2003.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., ‘Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioural economics’, Americsan Economic Review, vol. 93, no. 5, 2003, 1449–75.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Thinking, Fast and Slow, New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 2011.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., and Thaler, R. H., ‘Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 5, no.1, 1991, 193–206.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Lovallo, D., and Sibony, O., ‘Before you make that bid decision … ’, Harvard Business Review, vol. 89, no. 6, 2011, 50–60.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A., ‘Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk’, Econometrica, vol. 47, no. 2, 1979, 313–27.Google Scholar

Kardes, I., Ozturk, A., Cavusgil, S. T., and Cavusgil, E., ‘Managing global megaprojects: Complexity and risk management’, International Business Review, vol. 22, no. 6, 2013, 905–17.Google Scholar

Keil, M., ‘Pulling the plug: Software project management and the problem of project escalation’, MIS Quarterly, vol. 19, no. 4, 1995, 421–47.Google Scholar

Keil, M. and Mann, J., ‘The nature and extent of IT-project escalation: Results from a survey of IS audit and control professionals’, IS Audit & Control Journal, vol. 1, 1997, 40–8.Google Scholar

Keil, M. and Mann, J., ‘Understanding the nature and extent of IS project escalation: Results from a survey of IS audit and control professionals’, IEEE, Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 7–10 January 1997, 139–48.Google Scholar

Keil, M., Mann, J., and Rai, A., ‘Why software projects escalate: An empirical analysis and test of four theoretical models’, MIS Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 4, 2000, 631–64.Google Scholar

Kessides, I. N., ‘The future of the nuclear industry reconsidered: Risks, uncertainties, and continued promise’, Energy Policy, vol. 48, 2012, 185–208.Google Scholar

Keusch, T., Bollen, L. H. H., and Hassink, H. F. D., ‘Self-serving bias in annual report narratives: An empirical analysis of the impact of economic crises’, European Accounting Review, vol. 21, no. 3, 2013, 623–48.Google Scholar

Khalil, E. L., ‘Self-deceit and self-serving bias: Adam Smith on ‘General Rules’’, Journal of Institutional Economics, vol. 5, no. 2, 2009, 251–8.Google Scholar

Kharbanda, O. P. and Stallworthy, E. A., How to Learn from Project Disasters, Aldershot: Gower, 1983.Google Scholar

Kharbanda, O. P. and Stallworthy, E. A., ‘Lessons from project disasters’, Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol. 92, no. 3, 1992, 1–46.Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick, David. L. I., ‘Trends in the costs of weapon systems and the consequences’, Defence and Peace Economics, vol. 15, no. 3, 2004, 259–73.Google Scholar

Klein, B. H., ‘The decision making problem in development’, in Nelson, R., ed., The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962, pp. 477–508.Google Scholar

Klein, B. H. and Meckling, W., ‘Application of operations research to development projects’, Operations Research, vol. 6, no. 3, 1958, 352–63.Google Scholar

Knight, F. H., Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1921.Google Scholar

Konglige olje- og energidepartement, Kostnadsanalysen – norsk kontinentalsokkel, Oslo: Konglige olje- og energidepartement, 1980.Google Scholar

Krieger, M. H., ‘Big decisions and a culture of decision making’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, vol. 5, no. 4, 1986, 779–97.Google Scholar

Kruger, J. and Dunning, D., ‘Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 77, no. 6, 1999, 1121–34.Google Scholar

Kvalvik, S. and Johansen, P., Enhetskostnadsvekst på försvarsinvesteringer, Forsvarets Forskningsinstitutt, Rapport 2008/01129, 2008.Google Scholar

Landerer, N., ‘Rethinking the logics: A conceptual framework for the mediatization of politics’, Communication Theory, vol. 23, no. 3, 2013, 239–58.Google Scholar

Larwood, L. and Whittaker, W., ‘Managerial myopia: Self-serving biases in organizational planning’, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 62, no. 2, 1977, 194–8.Google Scholar

Lasswell, D. H., Politics: Who Gets What, When, How, New York: Whittlesey House, 1936.Google Scholar

Lavallo, D. and Kahneman, D., ‘Delusions of success: How optimism undermines executives’ decisions’, Harvard Business Review, vol. 81, no. 7, 2003, 56–63.Google Scholar

Lavallo, D. and Sibony, O., ‘The case for behavioral strategy’, McKinsey Quarterly, March 2010, 1–16.Google Scholar

Le Coze, J.-C., ‘1984–2014. Normal accidents. Was Charles Perrow right for the wrong reasons?’, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, vol. 23, no. 4, 2015, 275–86.Google Scholar

Lederer, A. L. and Prasad, J., ‘Causes of inaccurate software development cost estimates’, Journal of Systems Software, vol. 21, no. 2, 1995, 125–34.Google Scholar

Lee, J.-K., ‘Cost overrun and cause in Korean social overhead capital projects: Roads, rails, airports, and ports’, Journal of Urban Planning and Development, vol. 134, no. 2, 2008, 59–62.Google Scholar

Lehtonen, J.-M. and Anteroinen, J., ‘The capability factors as explanatory variables of equipment unit cost growth: A methodological proposal’, Defence and Peace Economics, vol. 27, no. 2, 2015, 1–19.Google Scholar

Lewis, S. and Grogan, T., ‘A hundred years of ENR Cost Indexes’, Engineering News-Record, 30 September 2013, 1–2.Google Scholar

Liebowitz, S. J. and Margolis, S. E., eds., ‘Path dependence’, in Bouckaert, B. and Geest, G., Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Elgar: Cheltenham, 2000, pp. 981–98.Google Scholar

Likierman, A., ‘Analysing project cost escalation: The case study of North Sea oil’, Accounting and Business Research, vol. 29, no. 29, 1977, 51–7.Google Scholar

Likierman, A., ‘Avoiding cost escalation on major projects’, Management Accounting, vol. 58, February 1980, 28–30.Google Scholar

Little, T., ‘Schedule estimation and uncertainty surrounding the cone of uncertainty’, IEEE Software, vol. 23, no. 3, 2006, 48–54.Google Scholar

Liu, L., Wehbe, G., and Sisovic, J., ‘The accuracy of hybrid estimating approaches: A case study of an Austrailian State Road & Traffic Authority’, The Engineering Economist, vol. 55, no. 3, 2010, 225–45.Google Scholar

Love, P. E. D., Ahiaga-Dagbui, D. D., and Irani, Z., ‘Cost overruns in transportation infrastructure projects: Sowing the seeds for a probabilistic theory of causation’, Transportation Research Part A, vol. 92, 2016, 184–94.Google Scholar

Love, P. E. D. and Edwards, D. J., ‘Determinants of rework in building construction projects’, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, vol. 11, no. 4, 2004, 259–74.Google Scholar

Love, P. E. D., Edwards, D. J., and Irani, Z., ‘Moving beyond optimism bias and strategic misrepresentation: An explanation for social infrastructure project cost overruns’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 59, no. 4, 2012, 560–71.Google Scholar

Love, P. E. D., Sing, C.-P., Wang, X., Irani, Z., and Thawala, D. W., ‘Overruns in transportation infrastructure projects’, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 10, no. 2, 2014, 141–59.Google Scholar

Love, P. E. D., Smith, J., Simpson, I., Regan, M., and Olatunji, O., ‘Understanding the landscape of overruns in transport infrastructure projects’, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, vol. 42, no. 3, 2015, 490–509.Google Scholar

Love, P. E. D. and Sohal, A. S., ‘Capturing rework costs in projects’, Managerial Audit Journal, vol. 18, no. 4, 2003, 329–39.Google Scholar

Lundberg, E., Produktivitet och räntabilitet, Stockholm: SNS, 1961.Google Scholar

Mahajan, J., ‘The overconfidence effect in marketing management predictions’, Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 29, no. 3, 1992, 329–42.Google Scholar

Maier, N. R. F., Problem-solving Discussions and Conferences: Leadership Methods and Skills, New York: MacGraw-Hill Book Company, 1963.Google Scholar

Magnussen, O. M. and Olsson, N. O. E., ‘Comparative analysis of cost estimates of major public investment projects’, International Journal of Project Management, vol. 24, no. 4, 2006, 281–8.Google Scholar

Malmendier, U. and Tate, G., ‘CEO overconfidence and corporate investment’ Journal of Finance, vol. 60, no. 6, 2005, 2661–2700.Google Scholar

Malmendier, U. and Tate, G., ‘Does overconfidence affect corporate investment? CEO overconfidence measures revisited’, European Financial Management, vol. 11, no. 5, 2005, 649–59.Google Scholar

Malmendier, U. and Tate, G., ‘Behavioral CEOs: The role of managerial overconfidence’, Journal of Economic Perspective, vol. 29, no. 4, 2015, 37–60.Google Scholar

Malmendier, U., Tate, G., and Yan, J., ‘Overconfidence and early-life experiences: The effect of managerial traits on corporate financial policies’, Journal of Finance, vol. 66, no. 5, 2011, 1687–733.Google Scholar

Malmendier, U. and Taylor, T., ‘On the verges of overconfidence’, Journal of Economic Perspective, vol. 29, no. 4, 2015, 3–7.Google Scholar

Malmi, T. and Brown, D. A., ‘Management control systems as a package: Opportunities, challenges and research directions’, Management Accounting Research, vol. 19, no. 4, 2008, 287–300.Google Scholar

Mansfield, E., Rapoport, J., Schnee, J., Wagner, S., and Hamburger, M., Research and Innovation in the Modern Corporation, New York: Norton, 1971.Google Scholar

Marglin, S., Approaches to Dynamic Investment Planning, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1963.Google Scholar

van Marrewijk, A., Clegg, S. R., Pitsis, T. S., and Veenswijk, M., ‘Managing public-private megaprojects: Paradoxes, complexity, and project design’, International Journal of Project Management, vol. 26, no. 6, 2008, 591–600.Google Scholar

Marschak, T., ‘The role of project histories in the study of R&D’, in Marschak, T., Glennan, T. K. Jr., and Summers, R., eds., Strategies for R&D: Studies in the Microeconomics of Development, Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1967, pp. 49–139.Google Scholar

Marschak, T., ‘Towards a normative theory of development’, in Marschak, T., Glennan, T. K. Jr., and Summers, R., eds., Strategies for R&D: Studies in the Microeconomics of Development, Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1967, pp. 190–221.Google Scholar

Marschak, T., Glennan, T. K. Jr. and Summers, R., eds., Strategies for R&D: Studies in the Microeconomics of Development, Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1967.Google Scholar

Marshall, A. W. and Meckling, W. H., ‘Predictability of the costs, time, and success of development’, in Nelson, R., ed., The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962, pp. 461–75.Google Scholar

Mashayekhi, A. N., ‘Project cost dynamics for development policy-making’, Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 51, no. 3, 2000, 301–10.Google Scholar

Mayes, B. T. and Allen, R. W., ‘Toward a definition of organizational politics’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 2, no. 4, 1977, 672–8.Google Scholar

Mazzoleni, G. and Schulz, W., ‘“Mediatization” of politics: A challenge for democracy?’, Political Communication, vol. 16, no. 3, 1999, 247–61.Google Scholar

McCraw, T. K., ed., Creating Modern Capitalism: How Entrepreneurs, Companies, and Countries Triumphed in Three Industrial Revolutions, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

McNamara, G., Moon, H., and Bromiley, P., ‘Banking on commitment: Intended and unintended consequences of an organization’s attempt to attenuate escalation of commitment’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 45, no. 2, 2002, 443–52.Google Scholar

McNees, S. K., ‘An assessment of the “official” economic forecasts’, New England Economic Review, July–August 1995, 13–24.Google Scholar

Memon, A. H., Rahman, I. A., Abdullah, M. R., Asmi, A., and Azis, A., ‘Factors affecting construction cost in Mara Large Construction Project: Perspective of project management consultant’, International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering & Technology, vol. 1, no. 2, 2010, 41–54.Google Scholar

Merewitz, L., ‘Public transportation: Wish fulfillment and reality in the San Francisco bay area’, American Economic Review, vol. 62, no. 2, 1972, 78–86.Google Scholar

Merewitz, L., ‘Cost overruns in public works’, in Niskanen, W., ed., Benefit-Cost and Policy Analysis 1972: An Aldine Annual on Forecasting, Decision-making, and Evaluation, Chicago: Aldine Pub. Co., 1973, pp. 278–95.Google Scholar

Merewitz, L., ‘How do urban rapid transit projects compare in cost estimating experience?’ Proceedings of the International Conference on Transportation Research, Brugge, June 1973, pp. 484–93.Google Scholar

Merrow, E. W., Phillips, K. E., and Myers, C. W., Understanding Cost Growth and Performance Shortfalls in Pioneer Process Plants, Santa Monica: The Rand Corporation, 1981.Google Scholar

Merrow, E. W., McDonnell, L., and Argüden, R. Y., Understanding the Outcomes of Megaprojects: A Qualitative Analysis of Very Large Civilian Projects, Santa Monica: The RAND Corporation, 1988.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K., ‘The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action’, American Sociological Review, vol. 1, no. 6, 1936, 894–904.Google Scholar

Messner, M., ‘The limits of accountability’, Accounting, Organization and Society, vol. 34, no. 8, 2009, 918–38.Google Scholar

Mest, D. P. and Plummer, E., E., ‘Analysts’ rationality and forecast bias: Evidence from sales forecasts’, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, vol. 21, no. 2, 2003, 103–22.Google Scholar

Mezias, J. M. and Starbuck, W. H., ‘What do managers know, anyway? A lot less than they think. Now, the good news’, Harvard Business Review, vol. 81, no. 5, 2003, 16–7.Google Scholar

Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. S., and Hankin, B. L., ‘Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias’, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 130, no. 5, 2004, 711–47.Google Scholar

Miller, D. T. and Ross, M., ‘Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction?’, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 82, no. 2, 1975, 129–65.Google Scholar

Miller, E. M., ‘Uncertainty induced bias in capital budgeting’, Financial Management, vol. 7, Fall 1978, 12–18.Google Scholar

Miller, P. and Power, M., ‘Accounting, organizing and economizing: Connecting accounting research and organization theory’, Academy of Management Annals, vol. 7, no. 1, 2014, 557–605.Google Scholar

Mintzberg, H., The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, New York: Prentice Hall, 1994.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., and Wood, D. J., ‘Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and silence: Defining the principle of who and what really counts’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 22, no. 4, 1997, 853–86.Google Scholar

Mitchell, F., and Walker, S. P., ‘Market pressures and the development of costing practice: The emergence of uniform costing in the UK printing industry’, Management Accounting Research, vol. 8, no. 1, 1997, 75–101.Google Scholar

Mitchels, R. Zur Soziologie des Parteiwesens in der modernen Demokratie. Untersuchungen über die oligarchischen Tendenzen des Gruppenlebens, Leipzig: Verlag von Dr. Werner Klinkhardt, 1911.Google Scholar

Mitchels, R. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchial Tendencies of Modern Democracy. Kitchener: Batoche Books, 2001.Google Scholar

Morner, A. L., ‘For SOHIO it was Alaskan oil: Or bust’, Fortune, August 1977, 173–84.Google Scholar

Morris, P. W. G., The Management of Projects, London: Telford, 1994.Google Scholar

Morris, P. W. G. and Hough, G. H., Preconditions of Success and Failure in Major Projects, Oxford: Major Project Association, 1986.Google Scholar

Morris, P. W. G. and Hough, G. H., The Anatomy of Major Projects: A Study of the Reality of Project Management. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1987.Google Scholar

Morris, P. W. G., Pinto, J., and Söderlund, J., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Project Management, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Morris, S., ‘Cost and time overruns in public sector projects’, Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 25, no. 47, 1990, M–154–68.Google Scholar

National Auditing Agency, Investering vid statens järnvägar, sjöfartsverket och luftfartsverket – beslutsunderlag och statsmakternas styrning, Dnr 1982:1168, Stockholm: Riksrevisionsverket, 1982.Google Scholar

National Auditing Agency, Varför blev det dyrare? Kostnadsutvecklingen för statliga reformer, Dnr 1983:334, Stockholm: Riksrevisionsverket, 1983.Google Scholar

National Auditing Agency, Infrastrukturinvesteringar: En kostnadsjämförelse mellan plan och utfall i 15 större projekt inom Vägverket och Banverket, RRV 1994:23, Stockholm: Riksrevisionsverket, 1994.Google Scholar

National Auditing Agency, Vägverkets, Banverkets och länens förslag till infrastrukturinvesteringar åren 1998–2007 – en kvalitetsbedömning av beslutsunderlaget, Stockholm: Riksrevisionsverket, 1997.Google Scholar

National Auditing Agency, Varför blev det dyrare? Kostnadsutvecklingen för offentlig försvarare, målsägandebiträde och offentligt biträde, Stockholm: Riksrevisionsverket, 2001.Google Scholar

National Audit Office, North Sea Cost Escalation Study, Department of Energy Paper No 7, London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1976.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. R., ‘The simple economics of basic scientific research’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 67, no. 3, 1959, 297–306.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. R., ‘Uncertainty, learning and the economics of parallel research and development efforts’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 43, no. 4, 1961, 351–64.Google Scholar

Newcomb, H. T., Railway Economics, Philadelphia: Railway World Pub. Co., 1898.Google Scholar

Nofsinger, J. R., The Psychology of Investing, 5th edn., Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2016.Google Scholar

Nordlund, P., Åkerström, J., Öström, B., and Löfstedt, H., Kostnadsutveckling för försvarsmateriel, Report FOI-R-3213-SE, Stockholm: Totalförsvarets forskningsinstitut, 2011.Google Scholar

Oborne, P., The Triumph of the Political Class, London: Simon & Schuster, 2007.Google Scholar

Odeck, J., ‘Cost overruns in road construction: What are their sizes and determinants?’, Transport Policy, vol. 11, no. 1, 2004, 43–53.Google Scholar

Odeck, J., ‘Do reforms reduce the magnitude of cost overruns in road projects? Statistical evidence from Norway’, Transportation Research Part A, vol. 65, July 2014, 68–79.Google Scholar

Odeck, J., Welde, M., and Volden, G. H., ‘The impact of external quality assurance of costs estimates on cost overruns: Empirical evidence from the Norwegian road sector’, European Journal of Transportation Infrastructure Research, vol. 15, no. 3, 2015, 286–303.Google Scholar

Odenmar, U., Kommunal budgetprocess och projektadministration för byggprojekt, Malmö: Avdelningen för Byggproduktionsteknik, Lunds Tekniska högskola, 1983.Google Scholar

Ogunlana, S. O., Accuracy in Design Cost Estimating, PhD thesis, Loughborough University of Technology, 1989.Google Scholar

Olaniran, O. J., Love, P. E. D., Edwards, D. J., Olatunj, O., and Matthews, J., ‘Chaotic dynamics of cost overruns in oil and gas megaprojects: A review’, International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, vol. 9, no. 7, 2015, 889–95.Google Scholar

Oliveira, S. J., Coutinho, M. C., and Martins, C. V., ‘Forecasting errors in capital budgeting: A multi-firm post-audit study’, The Engineering Economist, vol. 52, no. 1, 2007, 21–39.Google Scholar

Otoleva, P. and Snowberg, E., ‘Overconfidence in political behavior’, American Economic Review, vol. 105, no. 2, 2015, 504–35.Google Scholar

Ouchi, W., ‘The conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms’, Management Science, vol. 25, no. 9, 1979, 833–48.Google Scholar

Ouchi, W., and Berry, A., ‘Control, organization and accounting’, Accounting, Organization and Society, vol. 5, no. 2, 1980, 231–44.Google Scholar

Packard Commission, A Quest for Excellence: Final Report to the President’s Blue Ribbon Commission on Defense Management, Washington DC, June 1986.Google Scholar

Parkinson, C. N., The Law and the Profit, London: John Murray, 1960.Google Scholar

Patanakul, P., Kwak, Y. H., Zwikael, O., and Liu, M., ‘What impacts the performance of large-scale government projects?’, International Journal of Project Management, vol. 34, no. 3, 2016, 452–66.Google Scholar

Peck, M. S. and Scherer, F. M., The Weapons Acquisition Process: An Economic Analysis, Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1962.Google Scholar

Peng, T.-C., ‘Overcapitalization and cost escalation in housing renovation’, New Zealand Economic Papers, vol. 45, no. 1–2, 2011, 119–38.Google Scholar

Perrow, C. R., Normal Accident: Living with High Risk Technologies, New York: Basic Books, 1984.Google Scholar

Perrow, C. R., ‘Organizing to reduce the vulnerabilities of complexity’, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, vol. 7, no. 3, 1999, 150–5.Google Scholar

Perrow, C. R., ‘Complexity, catastrophe, and modularity’, Sociological Inquiry, vol. 78, no. 2, 2008, 162–73.Google Scholar

Persky, J., ‘Retrospectives: Cost-benefit analysis and the classical creed’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 15, no. 4, 2001, 199–208.Google Scholar

Peterson, C., ‘The future of optimism’, American Psychologist, vol. 55, no. 1, 2000, 44–55.Google Scholar

Pham, M. T., ‘Emotion and rationality: A critical review and interpretation of empirical evidence’, Review of General Psychology, vol. 11, no. 2, 2007, 155–78.Google Scholar

Pickrell, D. H., ‘A desire named streetcar: Fantasy and fact in rail transit planning’, Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 8, no. 2, 1990, 158–76.Google Scholar

Polanyi, K., The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, New York: Rinehart & Company, Inc., 1944.Google Scholar

Pope, D., Nuclear Implosions: The Rise and Fall of the Washington Public Power Supply System, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Postlewaite, A. and Compte, O., ‘Confidence enhanced performance’, American Economic Review, vol. 83, no. 5, 2005, 1536–57.Google Scholar

Powell, K., ed., The Great Builders, London: Thames & Hudson Ltd., 2011.Google Scholar

Prendergast, C., ‘A theory of “Yes Men”’, American Economic Review, vol. 83, no. 4, 1993, 757–70.Google Scholar

Prest, A. R., and Turvey, R., ‘Cost-benefit analysis: A survey’, Economic Journal, vol. 75, no. 300, 1965, 683–735.Google Scholar

Priemus, H., ‘Decision-making on mega-projects: Drifting on political discontinuity and market dynamics’, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, vol. 10, no. 1, 2010, 19–29.Google Scholar

Pruitt, S. W. and Gitman, L. J., ‘Capital budgeting forecast biases: Evidence from the Fortune 500’, Financial Management, vol. 15, Spring 1987, 46–51.Google Scholar

Przeworski, A., Stokes, S. C., and Manin, B., eds., Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Pugh, P., The Cost of Sea Power: The Influence of Money on Naval Affairs from 1815 to the Present Day, London: Conway Maritime Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., and Schimel, J., ‘Why do people need self-esteem? A theoretical and empirical review’, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 130, no. 3, 2004, 435–68.Google Scholar

Rabin, M., ‘Psychology and economics’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 36, no. 1, 1998, 11–46.Google Scholar

Reichelt, K. and Lyneis, J., ‘The dynamics of project performance: Benchmarking the drivers of cost and schedule overrun’, European Management Journal’, vol. 17, no. 2, 1999, 135–50.Google Scholar

Remer, D. S. and Buchanan, H. R., ‘The cost of doing a cost estimate’, Cost Engineering, vol. 35, no. 3, 1993, 7–11.Google Scholar

Remer, D. S. and Buchanan, H. R., ‘Estimating the cost for doing a cost estimate’, International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 66, no. 2, 2000, 101–4.Google Scholar

Roberts, J., ‘No one is perfect: The limits of transparency and an ethic for “intelligent! Accountability’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 34, no. 8, 2009, 957–70.Google Scholar

Roberts, J., ‘Organizational ignorance: Towards a managerial perspective on the unknown’, Management Learning, vol. 44, no. 3, 2012, 215–36.Google Scholar

Ross, J. and Staw, B. M., ‘Expo 86: An escalation prototype’, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 2, 1986, 274–97.Google Scholar

Ruttan, V. W., Is War Necessary for Economic Growth? Military Procurement and Technology Development, New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Sahlin-Andersson, K., Beslutsprocessens komplexitet: Att genomföra och hindra stora project, Karlshamn: Bokförlaget Doxa AB, 1986.Google Scholar

Sawhney, H., ‘Dynamics of infrastructure development: The role of metaphors, political will and sunk investment’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 23, no. 1, 2001, 33–51.Google Scholar

Sawyer, J. E., ‘Entrepreneurial error and economic growth’, Explorations in Entrepreneurial History, vol. 4, no. 2, 1952, 199–204.Google Scholar

Schmidt, J. B. and Calantone, R. J., ‘Escalation of commitment during new product development’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 30, no. 2, 2002, 103–18.Google Scholar

Schnee, J. E., ‘Development cost: Determinants and overruns’, Journal of Business, vol. 45, no. 3, 347–74.Google Scholar

Schonberger, R. J., ‘Why projects are “always” late: A rationale based on manual simulation of a PERT/CPM network’, Interfaces, vol. 11, no. 5, 1981, 66–70.Google Scholar

Schulz, W., ‘Reconstructing mediatization as an analytical concept’, European Journal of Communication, vol. 19, no. 1, 2004, 87–101.Google Scholar

Schultze, T., Pfeiffer, F., and Schulz-Hardt, S., ‘Biased information processing in the escalation paradigm: Information search and information evaluation as potential mediators of escalating commitment’, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 97, no. 1, 2012, 16–32.Google Scholar

Scitovsky, T., The Joyless Economy: An Inquiry into Human Satisfaction and Consumer Dissatisfaction, New York: Oxford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Sedikides, C., Campbell, W. K., Reeder, G., and Elliot, A., ‘Self-serving bias in a relational context’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 74, no. 2, 1998, 378–86.Google Scholar

Segelod, E., Kostnadsuppföljning med analys för Genastorp vattenkraftstation, Karlshamnsverkets första oljekraftverk samt för Barsebäcksverkets båda kärnkraftsaggregat, FE-rapport 187, Företagsekonomiska institutionen, Göteborgs Universitet, 1982.Google Scholar

Segelod, E., Kalkylering och avvikelser: Empiriska studier av stora projekt i kommuner och industriföretag, Malmö: Liber, 1986.Google Scholar

Segelod, E., ‘How to avoid cost overruns?’, Journal of General Management, vol. 16, no. 4, 1991, 16–23.Google Scholar

Segelod, E., ‘Explanations of project deviations’, in Hägg, I. and Segelod, E., eds., Issues in Empirical Investment Research, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1992, pp. 262–82.Google Scholar

Segelod, E., Renewal Through Internal Development, Aldershot: Avebury, 1995.Google Scholar

Segelod, E., Resource Allocation in Divisionalized Groups: A Study of Investment Manuals and Corporate Level Means of Control, Aldershot: Avebury, 1996.Google Scholar

Segelod, E., ‘Investments and investment processes in professional service groups’, International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 67, no. 2, 2000, 135–54.Google Scholar

Segelod, E., ‘Resource allocation in a few industries: Determinants and trends’, International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 77, no. 1, 2002, 63–70.Google Scholar

Segelod, E., ‘The cost of the Swedish nuclear waste program’, Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 48, no. 4, 2006, 314–24.Google Scholar

Segelod, E. and Carlsson, L., ‘The emergence of uniform principles of cost accounting in Sweden 1900-36’, Accounting, Business, and Financial History, vol. 20, no. 3, 2010, 327–63.Google Scholar

Segelod, E. and Jordan, G., ‘The use and importance of external sources of knowledge in the software development process’, R&D Management, vol. 34, no. 3, 2004, 239–52.Google Scholar

Shane, S. A., The Illusions of Entrepreneurship: The Costly Myths That Entrepreneurs, Investors, and Policy Makers Live, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Shapira, Z. and Berndt, D. J., ‘Managing grand-scale construction projects: A risk-taking perspective’, Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 19, 1996, 303–60.Google Scholar

Sharot, T., ‘The optimism bias’, Current Biology, vol. 21, no. 23, 2011, R941–5.Google Scholar

Shepherd, D. A., Patzelt, H., and Wolfe, M., ‘Moving forward from project failure: Negative emotions, affective commitment, and learning from the experience’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 54, no. 6, 2011, 1229–59.Google Scholar

Shepperd, J., Malone, W., and Sweeny, K., ‘Exploring causes of the self-serving bias’, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, vol. 2, no. 2, 2008, 895–908.Google Scholar

Siemiatycki, M., ‘Academic and Auditors: Comparing perspectives on transportation project cost overruns’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol. 29, no. 2, 2009, 142–56.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A., Administrative Behavior, New York: The Macmillan Company, 1947.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A., ‘A behavioural model of rational choice’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 69, no. 1, 1955, 99–118.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A., ‘Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science’, American Economic Review, vol. 49, no. 3, 1959, 253–83.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A., ‘Making management decisions: The role of intuition and emotion’, Academy of Management Executive, vol. 1, no. 1, 1987, 57–64.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A., ‘Bounded rationality in social science: Today and tomorrow’, Mind & Society, vol. 1, no. 1, 2000, 25–39.Google Scholar

Simon, M., Houghton, S. M., and Aquino, K., ‘Cognitive bias, risk perception, and venture formation: How individuals decide to start companies’, Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 15, no. 2, 1999, 113–34.Google Scholar

Sleesman, D. J., Conlon, D. E., McNamara, G., and Miles, J. E., ‘Cleaning up the big muddy: A meta-analytic review of the determinants of escalation of commitment’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 55, no. 3, 2012, 541–62.Google Scholar

Slemrod, J., ‘Thanatology and economics: The behavioral economics of death’, American Economic Review, vol. 93, no. 2, 2003, 371–5.Google Scholar

Smith, A., The Theory of Moral Sentiments, 6th edn., 1790, London: A. Millar, 1759.Google Scholar

Smith, A., An Inquiry into the Causes and Effects of the Wealth of Nations, London: W. Strahan; and T. Cadell, in the Strand, 1776.Google Scholar

Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., Schimel, J., Arndt, J., and Pyszczynski, T., ‘Human awareness of mortality and the evolution of culture’, in Schaller, M. and Crandell, C. S., eds., The Psychological Foundation of Culture, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 2004, pp. 15–40.Google Scholar

Sovacool, B. K., Nugent, D., and Gilbert, A., ‘Construction cost overruns and electricity infrastructure: An unavoidable risk?’, Electricity Journal, vol. 27, no. 4, 2014, 112–20.Google Scholar

The Standish Group, The CHAOS Report, 1995.Google Scholar

Stangert, P., Information, Uncertainty and Adaptive Planning, Stockholm: FOA P Rapport C8392-M3, 1974.Google Scholar

Stangert, P., ‘Adaptive planning and uncertainty resolution’, Futures, vol. 9, no. 1, 1977, 32–44.Google Scholar

Statman, M. and Tyebjee, T. T., ‘Optimistic capital budgeting forecasts: An experiment’, Financial Management, vol. 13, Autumn 1985, 27–33.Google Scholar

Staw, B. M., ‘Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action’, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, vol. 16, no. 1, 1976, 27–44.Google Scholar

Staw, B. M., ‘The escalation of commitment: An update and appraisal’, in Shapira, Z., ed., Organizational Decision Making, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, pp. 191–215.Google Scholar

Staw, B. M., and Ross, J., ‘Understanding behaviour in escalation situations’, Science, vol. 246, no. 4927, 1989, 216–20.Google Scholar

Stecklein, J. M., Dabney, J., Brandon, D., Haskins, B., Lowell, R., and Moroney, G., Error cost escalation through the project life cycle, Report JSC-CN-8435, Houston, TX: NASA Johnson Space Center, 2004.Google Scholar

Steinberg, G. M., ‘Large-scale national projects as political symbols: The case of Israel’, Comparative Politics, vol. 19, no. 3, 1987, 331–46.Google Scholar

Summers, R., ‘Cost estimates as predictors of actual costs: A statistical study of military developments’, in Marschak, T., Glennan, T. K. Jr., and Summers, R., eds., Strategy for R&D, Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1967, pp. 140–89.Google Scholar

Svedenstierna, E. T. and Lidbeck, C. J., ‘Utdrag af byggnads-räkningen öfver Tunkarsbo nya masugn, år 1805’, Samlingar i bergsvettenskapen, vol. 3, no. 1, 1811, pp. 44–9.Google Scholar

Svenson, O., ‘Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers?’, Acta Psychologica, vol. 47, no. 2, 1981, 143–8.Google Scholar

Svensson, P., Styrning av produktutvecklingsprojekt: En studie av förutsättningarna för planering av produktutvecklingsprojekt i några svenska verkstadsföretag, Göteborg: Institutionen för Industriell organisation och ekonomi, Chalmers tekniska högskola, 1990.Google Scholar

Sverlinger, P.-A. M., Managing Knowledge in Professional Service Organizations: Technical Consultants Serving the Construction Industry, Gothenburg: Department of Service Management, Chalmers University of Technology, 2000.Google Scholar

Swedish Government Official Reports, Spent Nuclear Fuel and Radioactive Waste: A Summary of a Report Given by the Swedish Government Committee on Radioactive Waste, SOU 1976:32, Stockholm, 1976.Google Scholar

Swedish Government Official Reports, Kärnkraftens avfall: Organisation och finansiering, SOU 1980:14, Stockholm: Liber Förlag, 1980.Google Scholar

Swedish Government Official Reports, Översyn av lagstiftningen på kärnenergiområdet, SOU 1991:107, Stockholm: Allmänna förlaget, 1991.Google Scholar

Swedish Government Official Reports, Säkrare finansiering av framtida kärnavfallskostnader, SOU 1994:107, Stockholm: Fritze, 1994.Google Scholar

Swedish Government Official Reports, Säkrare finansiering av framtida kärnavfallskostnader, SOU 1994:108, Stockholm: Fritze, 1994.Google Scholar

Swedish Government Official Reports, Betalningsansvaret för kärnavfallet, SOU 2004:125, Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik, 2004.Google Scholar

Swedish Nuclear Waste Fund, Antagande om real avkastning på medlen i Kärnavfallsfonden inför avgiftsberäkningar m.m. för år 2004, Dnr KAFS 14–03, 2003.Google Scholar

Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company, Kärnkraftens slutsteg – Plan 82: Plan för kärnkraftens radioaktiva restprodukter, Stockholm: Svensk Kärnbränsleförsörjning AB, 1982.Google Scholar

Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company, Kärnkraftens slutsteg – Plan 83: Plan för kärnkraftens radioaktiva restprodukter, Stockholm: Svensk Kärnbränsleförsörjning AB, 1983.Google Scholar

Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company, Plan 1984: Kostnader för kärnkraftens radioaktiva restprodukter, Stockholm: Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB, 1984.Google Scholar

Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company, Plan 2004: Kostnader för kärnkraftens radioaktiva restprodukter, Stockholm: Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB, 2004.Google Scholar

Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company, Plan 2013. Costs from and including 2015 for the radioactive residual products from nuclear power. Basis for fees and guarantees for the period 2015–2017, Technical Report TR-14–16, Stockholm: Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company, 2014.Google Scholar

Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G., and Koch, J., ‘Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 34, no. 4., 2009, 689–709.Google Scholar

Tang, M.-J., ‘An economic perspective on escalating commitment’, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 9, Summer 1988, 79–92.Google Scholar

Tchapga, F., Overview and comparison of international practices on funding mechanisms, Topical Session on Funding Issues in Connection with Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Plants, Paris: Nuclear Energy Agency and OECD, 2004.Google Scholar

Tiger, L., Optimism: The Biology of Hope, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1979.Google Scholar

Toda, M., ‘Emotion and decision making’, Acta Psychologica, vol. 45, no. 1–3, 1980, 133–55.Google Scholar

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., ‘Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases’, Science, vol. 185, no. 4157, 1974, 1124–31.Google Scholar

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D., ‘The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice’, Science, vol. 211, 30 January 1981, 453–8.Google Scholar

Tyebjee, T. T., ‘Behavioral biases in new product forecasting’, International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 3, no. 3–4, 1987, 393–404.Google Scholar

Unger, E. J., Gallagher, M. A., and White, E. D., III, ‘R&D budget-driven cost and schedule overruns’, Journal of Cost Analysis & Management, vol. 6, no. 1, 2004, 80–9.Google Scholar

Vaki, A., ‘Human uniqueness and the denial of death’, Nature, vol. 460, 6 August 2009, 684.Google Scholar

Wachs, M., ‘When planners lie with numbers’, Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 55, no. 4, 1989, 476–9.Google Scholar

Waldman, M., ‘Systematic errors and the theory of natural selection’, American Economic Review, vol. 84, no. 3, 1994, 482–97.Google Scholar

Walsh, J. P. and Seward, J. K., ‘On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 15, no. 3, 1990, 421–58.Google Scholar

Wildavsky, A., ‘The political economy of efficiency: Cost-benefit analysis, systems analysis, and program budgeting’, Public Administration Review, vol. 26, no. 4, 1966, 292–310.Google Scholar

Wildavsky, A., ‘If planning is everything, maybe it’s nothing’, Policy Science, vol. 4, no. 2, 1973, 127–53.Google Scholar

Williams, D. W., ‘The politics of forecast bias: Forecaster effect and other effects in New York City revenue forecasting’, Public Budgeting & Finance, vol. 32, no. 4, 2012, 1–18.Google Scholar

Williams, T., ‘Assessing and moving on from the dominant project management discourse in the light of project overruns’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 52, no. 4, 2005, 497–508.Google Scholar

Wilson, R. M., and Zhang, Q., ‘Entrapment and escalating commitment in investment decision making: A review’, British Accounting Review, vol. 29, no. 3, 1997, 277–303.Google Scholar

Wittfogel, K. A., Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Woodward, S. N., ‘Performance in planning a large project’, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 19, no. 2, 1982, 183–98.Google Scholar

World Nuclear Association, The Economics of Nuclear Power, Information Papers, London: World Nuclear Association, 2008.Google Scholar

Wramsby, G. and Österlund, U., Svenska fastighetsinvesteringar inom EG 1987–1990: Investeringsbedömning, kreditbedömning och hyrespåverkande variabler, Göteborg: Handelshögskolan vid Göteborgs Universitet, 1995.Google Scholar

Xia, W. and Lee, G., ‘Grasping the complexity of IS development projects’, Communications of the ACM, vol. 47, no. 5, 2004, 138–47.Google Scholar

Yates, J. F., Lee, J.-W., and Shinotsuka, H., ‘Beliefs about over-confidence, including its cross-national variation’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 65, no. 2, 1996, 138–47.Google Scholar

Yen, C.-L. and Lin, C.-Y., ‘The effects of mortality salience on escalation of commitment’, International Journal of Psychology, vol. 47, no. 1, 2012, 51–7.Google Scholar

Zacharakis, A. L. and Shepherd, D. A., ‘The nature of information and overconfidence on venture capitalists’ decision making’, Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 16, no. 4, 2001, 311–32.Google Scholar

Zardkoohi, A., ‘Do real options lead to escalation of commitment?’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 29, no. 1, 2004, 111–9.Google Scholar