Book contents
- Tokens of Power
- Tokens of Power
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- 1 The Ambiguity of Military Planning
- 2 The Measurement of Military Power
- 3 Military Strategy and the Lessons of History
- 4 Great Power Competition and the Causes of War
- 5 Planning for the First World War
- 6 Tanks in the Second World War
- 7 The Great Powers and Nuclear Weapons
- 8 The Construction of U.S. Cold War Interests
- 9 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 March 2017
Book contents
- Tokens of Power
- Tokens of Power
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- 1 The Ambiguity of Military Planning
- 2 The Measurement of Military Power
- 3 Military Strategy and the Lessons of History
- 4 Great Power Competition and the Causes of War
- 5 Planning for the First World War
- 6 Tanks in the Second World War
- 7 The Great Powers and Nuclear Weapons
- 8 The Construction of U.S. Cold War Interests
- 9 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Tokens of PowerRethinking War, pp. 273 - 300Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Abu-Lughod, Janet L. Before European Hegemony: The World System A.D. 1250–1350. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Addington, Larry H. The Patterns of War since the Eighteenth Century. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994 [1984].Google Scholar
Alasuutari, Pertti. The Synchronization of National Policies: Ethnography of the Global Tribe of Moderns. New York: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Albertini, Luigi. The Origins of the War of 1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Allison, Graham T. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little, Brown, 1971.Google Scholar
Allison, Graham T. and Halperin, Morton H.. “Bureaucratic Politics: A Paradigm and Some Policy Implications.” World Politics 24 (1972): 40–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. The Limits of Organization. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1974.Google Scholar
Avant, Deborah. Political Institutions and Military Change: Lessons from Peripheral Wars. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Avant, Deborah. “From Mercenary to Citizen Armies: Explaining Change in the Practice of War.” International Organization 54 (2000): 41–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avant, Deborah. “Political Institutions and Military Effectiveness: Contemporary United States and United Kingdom.” In Creating Military Power: The Sources of Military Effectiveness, edited by Brooks, Risa A. and Stanley, Elizabeth A., 80–105. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. Conflict of Interest: A Theory of Divergent Goals with Applications to Politics. Chicago: Markham Publishing Company, 1970.Google Scholar
Ball, Simon J. The Cold War: An International History, 1947–1991. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Baran, Paul A. and Sweezy, Paul M.. Monopoly Capital: An Essay on the American Economic and Social Order. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael and Finnemore, Martha. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Beaufre, Général d’Armée André. “Liddell Hart and the French Army, 1919–1939.” In The Theory and Practice of War, edited by Howard, Michael, 129–142. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Beck, Colin J. “The World-Cultural Origins of Revolutionary Waves: Five Centuries of European Contention.” Social Science History 35.2 (2011): 167–207.Google Scholar
Beckman, Peter R., Campbell, Larry, Crumlish, Paul W., Dobkowski, Michael N., and Lee, Steven P.. The Nuclear Predicament: Nuclear Weapons in the Cold War and Beyond, second edition. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1992.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Jeremy. Hitler’s Uranium Club. Woodbury: American Institute of Physics, 1996.Google Scholar
Biddle, Stephen. Military Power: Explaining Victory and Defeat in Modern Battle. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Bidwell, Shelford and Graham, Dominick. Fire-Power: British Army Weapons and Theories of War 1904–1945. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1982.Google Scholar
Blechman, Barry and Hart, Douglas. “The Political Utility of Nuclear Weapons: The 1973 Middle East Crisis.” In Strategy and Nuclear Deterrence, edited by Miller, Steven E., 273–297. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Lincoln P. Forward to Without the Bomb: The Politics of Nuclear Nonproliferation, edited by Reiss, Mitchell, vii–x. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Bluth, Christoph. Britain, Germany, and Western Nuclear Strategy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Boli, John and Thomas, George M.. “World Culture in the World Polity: A Century of International Non-Governmental Organization.” American Sociological Review 62 (1997): 171–190.Google Scholar
Boli, John and Thomas, George M., Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations since 1875. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Bond, Brian. “Doctrine and Training in the British Cavalry, 1870–1914.” In The Theory and Practice of War, edited by Howard, Michael, 95–128. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Bond, Brian. British Military Policy between the Two World Wars. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Bond, Brian. The Pursuit of Victory: From Napoleon to Saddam Hussein. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Bond, Brian and Murray, Williamson. “The British Armed Forces, 1918–39.” In Military Effectiveness: Volume II: The Interwar Period, edited by Millett, Allan R. and Murray, Williamson, 98–130. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1988.Google Scholar
Boot, Max. War Made New: Technology, Warfare, and the Course of History, 1500 to Today. New York: Gotham, 2006.Google Scholar
Borer, Douglas A. Superpowers Defeated: Vietnam and Afghanistan Compared. London: Frank Cass, 1999.Google Scholar
Boyle, Elizabeth Heger. Female Genital Cutting: Cultural Conflict in the Global Community. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Boyle, Elizabeth H., Kim, Minzee, and Longhofer, Wesley. “Abortion Liberalization in World Society, 1960–2009.” American Journal of Sociology, 121 (2015): 882–913.Google Scholar
Boyle, Elizabeth Heger, and Preves, Sharon E.. “National Politics as International Process: The Case of Anti-Female-Genital-Cutting Laws.” Law & Society Review 34 (2000): 703–737.Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand. The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Brodie, Bernard. Strategy in the Missile Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Brodie, Bernard and Fawn, M. From Crossbow to H-Bomb. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Brooks, Risa A. “Introduction: The Impact of Culture, Society, Institutions, and International Forces on Military Effectiveness.” In Creating Military Power: The Sources of Military Effectiveness, edited by Brooks, Risa A. and Stanley, Elizabeth A., 1–26. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Brooks, Risa A. Shaping Strategy: The Civil-Military Politics of Strategic Assessment. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Brooks, Risa A. and Stanley, Elizabeth A., (Eds.) Creating Military Power: The Sources of Military Effectiveness. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Brose, Eric Dorn. The Kaiser’s Army: The Politics of Military Technology in Germany during the Machine Age, 1870–1918. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael E., Coté, Owen R. Jr., Lynn-Jones, Sean M., and Miller, Steven E., (Eds.) Offense, Defense, and War. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph M., and Morrow, James D.. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Carr, E.H. Great Britain as a Mediterranean Power, Cust Foundation Lecture, University College, Nottingham, 1937.Google Scholar
Carr, Edward Hallett. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. New York: Palgrave, 2001[1939].Google Scholar
Carruthers, Bruce G. and Espeland, Wendy Nelson. “Accounting for Rationality: Double-Entry Bookkeeping and the Rhetoric of Economic Rationality.” American Journal of Sociology 97 (1991): 31–69.Google Scholar
Catudal, Honoré M. Soviet Nuclear Strategy from Stalin to Gorbachev. Berlin: Verlag, 1989.Google Scholar
Challener, Richard D. The French Theory of the Nation in Arms, 1866–1939. New York: Columbia University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Childs, John. Armies and Warfare in Europe, 1648–1789. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Chirot, Daniel. Social Change in the Modern Era. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1986.Google Scholar
Chirot, Daniel and Hall, Thomas D.. “World-System Theory.” Annual Review of Sociology 8 (1982): 81–106.Google Scholar
Church, William Conant. Ulysses S. Grant and the Period of National Preservation and Reconstruction. Garden City: Garden City Publishing Company, 1926.Google Scholar
Citino, Robert M. Armored Forces: History and Sourcebook. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Citino, Robert M. Quest for Decisive Victory: From Stalemate to Blitzkrieg in Europe, 1899–1940. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2002.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian and Wheeler, Nicholas J.. The British Origins of Nuclear Strategy, 1945–1955. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Clausewitz, Carl von. On War, edited and translated by Howard, Michael and Paret, Peter. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Clodfelter, Micheal. Warfare and Armed Conflicts: A Statistical Reference, vols. 1–2. Jefferson: McFarland and Co, 1992.Google Scholar
Cohen, Eliot A and Gooch, John. Military Misfortunes: The Anatomy of Failure in War. New York: Free Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Colaresi, Michael P. Scare Tactics: The Politics of International Rivalry. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Colaresi, Michael P., Rasler, Karen, and Thompson, William R.. Strategic Rivalries in World Politics: Position, Space and Conflict Escalation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Cole, Wade M. “Sovereignty Relinquished? Explaining Commitment to the International Human Rights Covenants, 1966–1999.” American Sociological Review 70 (2005): 472–495.Google Scholar
Cole, Wade M. “Human Rights as Myth and Ceremony? Reevaluating the Effectiveness of Human Rights Treaties, 1981–2007.” American Journal of Sociology 117 (2012): 1131–1171.Google Scholar
Cole, Wade M. and Ramirez, Francisco O.. “Conditional Decoupling: Assessing the Impact of National Human Rights Institutions, 1981 to 2004.” American Sociological Review 78 (2013): 702–725.Google Scholar
Corum, James S. The Roots of Blitzkrieg: Hans von Seeckt and German Military Reform. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1992.Google Scholar
Corum, James S. “A Comprehensive Approach to Change: Reform in the German Army in the Interwar Period.” In The Challenge of Change: Military Institutions and New Realities, 1918–1941, edited by Winton, Harold R. and Mets, David R., 35–73. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Cumings, Bruce. The Origins of the Korean War: Volume II The Roaring of the Cataract, 1947–1950. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Cyert, Richard M. and March, James G.. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers, 1963.Google Scholar
Dafoe, Allen, Renshon, Jonathan, and Huth, Paul. “Reputation and Status as Motives for War.” Annual Review of Political Science 17 (2014): 371–393.Google Scholar
Debs, Alexandre and Monteiro, Nuno P.. “Known Unknowns: Power Shifts, Uncertainty, and War.” International Organization 68 (2014): 1–31.Google Scholar
Der Derian, James. On Diplomacy: A Genealogy of Western Estrangement. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1987.Google Scholar
DiCicco, Jonathan M. and Levy, Jack S.. “Power Shifts and Problem Shifts: The Evolution of the Power Transition Research Program.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 43 (1999): 675–704.Google Scholar
Diehl, Paul F. and Goertz, Gary. War and Peace in International Rivalry. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J. and Powell, Walter W.. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (1983): 147–160.Google Scholar
Dobbin, Frank. Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Dobbin, Frank. Inventing Equal Opportunity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Dobson, John M. America’s Ascent: The United States Becomes a Great Power, 1880–1914. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Dorn, Walter Louis. Competition for Empire, 1740–1763. New York: Harper Brothers, 1940.Google Scholar
Doughty, Robert A. The Seeds of Disaster: The Development of French Army Doctrine, 1919–1939. Hamden: Archon, 1985.Google Scholar
Doughty, Robert A. “The French Armed Forces, 1918–40.” In Military Effectiveness: Volume II: The Interwar Period, edited by Millett, Allan R. and Murray, Williamson, 39–69. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1988.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. All Politics Is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. “Military Primacy Doesn’t Pay (Nearly As Much As You Think).” International Security 38 (2013): 52–79.Google Scholar
Drori, Gili S., Meyer, John W., and Hwang, Hokyu. Globalization and Organization: World Society and Organizational Change. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Drori, Gili S., Meyer, John W., Ramirez, Francisco, and Schofer, Evan. Science in the Modern World Polity: Institutionalization and Globalization. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Duffield, John S. World Power Forsaken: Political Culture, International Institutions, and German Security Policy after Unification. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Duffield, John S., Farrell, Theo, Price, Richard, and Desch, Michael C.. “Isms and Schisms: Culturalism versus Realism in Security Studies.” International Security 24 (1999): 156–180.Google Scholar
Duffy, Christopher. The Army of Frederick the Great. Vancouver: Douglas David and Charles Limited, 1974.Google Scholar
Dupuy, Trevor N. A Genius for War: The German Army and General Staff, 1807–1945. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1977.Google Scholar
Echevarria, Antulio J. II. After Clausewitz: German Military Thinkers before the Great War. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Eden, Lynn. Whole World on Fire: Organizations, Knowledge, and Nuclear Weapons Devastation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Enthoven, Alain C. and Smith, K. Wayne. How Much Is Enough? Shaping the Defense Program, 1961–1969. New York: Harper and Row, 1971.Google Scholar
Espeland, Wendy Nelson and Stevens, Mitchell L.. “Commensuration as a Social Process.” Annual Review of Sociology 24 (1998): 313–343.Google Scholar
Evangelista, Matthew. Innovation and the Arms Race: How the United States and the Soviet Union Develop New Military Technologies. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Farrell, Theo. Weapons without a Cause: The Politics of Weapons Acquisition in the United States. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1996.Google Scholar
Farrell, Theo. “Culture and Military Power,” Review of International Studies 24 (1998): 407–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Theo. “Constructivist Security Studies: Portrait of a Research Program.” International Studies Review 4 (2002): 49–72.Google Scholar
Farrell, Theo. The Norms of War: Cultural Beliefs and Modern Conflict. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2005a.Google Scholar
Farrell, Theo. “World Culture and Military Power.” Security Studies 14(3): (2005b), 448–488.Google Scholar
Farrell, Theo. “Global Norms and Military Effectiveness: The Army in Early Twentieth-Century Ireland.” In Creating Military Power: The Sources of Military Effectiveness, edited by Brooks, Risa A. and Stanley, Elizabeth A., 136–157. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Farrell, Theo. “Improving in War: Military Adaptation and the British in Helmand Province, Afghanistan, 2006–2009.” Journal of Strategic Studies 33.4 (2010): 567–594.Google Scholar
Farrell, Theo and Terriff, Terry. The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2002.Google Scholar
Fazal, Tanisha. State Death: The Politics and Geography of Conquest, Annexation and Occupation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes.” The American Political Science Review 88.3 (1994): 577–592.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. “Rationalist Explanations for War.” International Organization 49 (1995): 379–414.Google Scholar
Feis, Herbert. From Trust to Terror: The Onset of the Cold War, 1945–1950. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 1970.Google Scholar
Fey, Mark and Ramsay, Kristopher W.. “Mutual Optimism and War.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (2007): 738–754.Google Scholar
Filson, Darren and Werner, Suzanne. “A Bargaining Model of War and Peace.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (2002): 819–838.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996a.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. “Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from Sociology’s Institutionalism.” International Organization 50.2 (1996b): 325–347.Google Scholar
Fischer, Fritz. War of Illusions: German Policies from 1911 to 1914. London: Chatto and Windus, 1975.Google Scholar
Fourcade, Marion. Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Fourcade-Gourinchas, Marion, and Babb, Sarah L.. “The Rebirth of the Liberal Creed: Paths to Neoliberalism in Four Countries.” American Journal of Sociology 108.3 (2002): 533–579.Google Scholar
Frank, David John and Gabler, Jay. Reconstructing the University: Worldwide Shifts in Academia in the 20th Century. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Freedman, Lawrence. The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy, third edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.Google Scholar
Friedland, Roger and Alford, Robert R.. “Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradiction.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by Powell, Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul J., 232–263. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Fuller, J. F. C. A Military History of the Western World, Volume III. New York: Funk and Wagnalls, 1956.Google Scholar
Fuller, J. F. C. The Conduct of War, 1789–1961. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis. The United States and the Origins of the Cold War, 1941–1947. New York: Columbia University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis. Strategies of Containment: A Critical Appraisal of Postwar American National Security Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis. The Long Peace: Inquiries into the History of the Cold War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Gallo-Cruz, Selina. “Organizing Global Nonviolence: The Growth and Spread of Nonviolent INGOs, 1948–2003.” Research in Social Movements, Conflict, and Change 34 (2012): 213–256.Google Scholar
Gardner, Lloyd C., Schlesinger, Arthur Jr., and Morgenthau, Hans J.. The Origins of the Cold War. Waltham: Ginn-Blaisdell, 1970.Google Scholar
Gartner, Scott Sigmund. Strategic Assessment in War. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Gat, Azar. The Origins of Military Thought from the Enlightenment to Clausewitz. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L. and Smoke, Richard. Deterrence in American Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice. New York: Columbia University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. “The Theory of Hegemonic War.” The Journal of Interdisciplinary History 18 (1988): 591–613.Google Scholar
Glaser, Charles L. Rational Theory of International Politics: The Logic of Competition and Cooperation. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 2010.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Pinker, Steven, Thayer, Bradley A., Levy, Jack S., and Thompson, William R.. “The Decline of War.” International Studies Review 15 (2013): 396–419.Google Scholar
Goddard, Stacie E. Indivisible Territory and the Politics of Legitimacy: Jerusalem and Northern Ireland. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Goemans, Hein E. War and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination and the First World War. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary and Levy, Jack S. (eds.). Explaining War and Peace: Case Studies and Necessary Condition Counterfactuals. New York: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
Goldman, Emily O. “The Spread of Western Military Models to Ottoman Turkey and Meiji Japan.” In Farrell, Theo and Terriff, Terry (eds.), The Sources of Military Change: Culture, Politics, Technology, 41–68. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2002.Google Scholar
Goldman, Emily O. “International Competition and Military Effectiveness: Naval Air Power, 1919–1945.” In Brooks, Risa A. and Stanley, Elizabeth A. (eds.), Creating Military Power: The Sources of Military Effectiveness, 158–185. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Goldman, Emily O. Power in Uncertain Times: Strategy in the Fog of Peace. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Goldman, Emily O. and Eliason, Leslie C. (eds.). The Diffusion of Military Technology and Ideas. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, Bertrand. Atomic Rivals, translated by Temmer, Georges M.. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua S. Winning the War on War: The Decline of Armed Conflict Worldwide. New York: Dutton, 2011.Google Scholar
Gordon, Philip H. A Certain Idea of France: French Security Policy and the Gaullist Legacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Graebner, Norman A. “Myth and Reality: America’s Rhetorical Cold War.” In Critical Reflections on the Cold War: Linking Rhetoric and History, edited by Medhurst, Martin J. and Brands, H.W., 20–37. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Grenville, J.A.S. “Diplomacy and War Plans in the United States, 1890–1917.” In The War Plans of the Great Powers, 1880–1914, edited by Kennedy, Paul M., 23–28. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1979 [1961].Google Scholar
Grieco, Joseph M. “Realist International Theory and the Study of World Politics.” In Thinking in International Relations Theory, edited by Doyle, Michael W. and Ikenberry, G. John, 163–201. Boulder: Westview, 1997.Google Scholar
Griffin, Larry J., Devine, Joel A., and Wallace, Michael. “Monopoly Capital, Organized Labor, and Military Expenditures in the United States, 1949–1976.” American Journal of Sociology 88 (1982): S113–S153.Google Scholar
Griffith, Paddy. Military Thought in the French Army, 1815–51. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Habeck, Mary R. Storm of Steel: The Development of Armor Doctrine in Germany and the Soviet Union, 1919–1939. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. and Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. “Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises.” American Journal of Sociology 110 (2005): 1373–1411.Google Scholar
Hallett, Tim and Ventresca, Marc J.. “Inhabited Institutions: Social Interactions and Organizational Forms in Gouldner’s Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy.” Theory and Society 35 (2006): 213–236.Google Scholar
Halperin, Morton H. “The Korean War.” In The Use of Force: International Politics and Foreign Policy, edited by Art, Robert J. and Waltz, Kenneth N., 216–234. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1971.Google Scholar
Halperin, Morton H. Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1974.Google Scholar
Hannigan, Robert E. 2002. The New World Power: American Foreign Policy, 1898–1917. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Harris, J.P. Men, Ideas and Tank: British Military Thought and Armoured Forces, 1903–1939. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Hassner, Ron E. “To Halve and to Hold: Conflicts over Sacred Space and the Problem of Indivisibility.” Security Studies 12.4 (2003): 1–33.Google Scholar
Hassner, Ron E. “The Path to Intractability Time and the Entrenchment of Territorial Disputes.” International Security 31 (2006): 107–138.Google Scholar
Haveman, Heather A. “Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Organizational Change and Performance Under Conditions of Fundamental Environmental Transformation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 37 (1992): 48–75.Google Scholar
Haveman, Heather A. “Follow the Leader: Mimetic Isomorphism and Entry into New Markets.” Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (1993): 593–627.Google Scholar
Healy, Kieran. Last Best Gifts: Altruism and the Market for Human Blood and Organs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Heinemann, W. “The Development of German Armoured Forces 1918–40.” In Armoured Warfare, edited by Harris, J.P. and Toase, F.H., 51–69. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Herrera, Geoffrey L. and Mahnken, Thomas G.. “Military Diffusion in Nineteenth-Century Europe: The Napoleonic and Prussian Military Systems.” In The Diffusion of Military Technology and Ideas, edited by Goldman, Emily O. and Eliason, Leslie C., 205–242. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Herring, George C. America’s Longest War: The United States and Vietnam, 1950–1975, second edition. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1986.Google Scholar
Herrmann, David G. The Arming of Europe and the Making of the First World War. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Herwig, Holger H. The First World War: Germany and Austria-Hungary 1914–1918. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 1996.Google Scholar
Herwig, Holger H. “Command Decision Making: Imperial Germany, 1871–1914.” In The Fog of Peace and War Planning, edited by Imlay, Talbot C. and Toft, Monica Duffy, 100–125. New York: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Herwig, Holger H. and Trask, D.F.. “Naval Operations Plans between Germany and the USA, 1898–1913.” In The War Plans of the Great Powers, 1880–1914, edited by Kennedy, Paul M., 39–74. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1979 [1970].Google Scholar
Hicks, Alexander. Social Democracy and Welfare Capitalism: A Century of Income Security Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Hironaka, Ann. Neverending Wars: The International Community, Weak States, and the Perpetuation of Civil War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Hironaka, Ann. Greening the Globe: World Society and Environmental Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric J. The Age of Extremes: A History of the World, 1914–1991. New York: Pantheon Books, 1994.Google Scholar
Holloway, David. The Soviet Union and the Arms Race. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Holloway, David. Stalin and the Bomb: The Soviet Union and Atomic Energy 1939–1956. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Holmes, Richard. The Road to Sedan: The French Army 1866–70. London: Royal Historical Society, 1984.Google Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi J. Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order, 1648–1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Homer-Dixon, Thomas F. and Levy, Marc A.. “Environment and Security.” International Security 20 (1995–1996): 189–198.Google Scholar
Horowitz, David. “Introduction.” In Containment and Revolution, edited by Horowitz, David, 9–12. London: Anthony Blond, 1967.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Michael. “The Spread of Nuclear Weapons and International Conflict: Does Experience Matter? Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (2009): 234–257.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Michael C. The Diffusion of Military Power: Causes and Consequences for International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Howard, Michael. The Franco-Prussian War: The German Invasion of France, 1870–1871. New York: Macmillan, 1962.Google Scholar
Howard, Michael. “Men against Fire: Expectations of War in 1914.” In Military Strategy and the Origins of the First World War, edited by Miller, Steven E., Lynn-Jones, Sean M. and Van Evera, Stephen, 3–19. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991 [1984].Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. “Why International Primacy Matters.” International Security 17 (1993): 68–83.Google Scholar
Huth, Paul K. 1996. Standing Your Ground: Territorial Disputes and International Conflict. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hymans, Jacques. The Psychology of Nuclear Proliferation: Identity, Emotions, and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Hymans, Jacques. Achieving Nuclear Ambitions: Scientists, Politicians, and Proliferation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. “Liberal Order Building.” In To Lead the World: American Strategy after the Bush Doctrine, edited by Leffler, Melvyn P. and Legro, Jeffrey W., 85–108. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Imlay, Talbot C. and Toft, Monica Duffy (eds.), The Fog of Peace and War Planning. New York: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Jepperson, Ronald L., Wendt, Alexander, and Katzenstein, Peter J.. “Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security.” In The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J., 33–75. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma.” World Politics 30 (1978): 167–214.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. “The Impact of the Korean War on the Cold War.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 24 (1980): 563–592.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. The Illogic of American Nuclear Strategy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. The Meaning of the Nuclear Revolution: Statecraft and the Prospect of Armageddon. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. “Domino Beliefs and Strategic Behavior.” In Dominoes and Bandwagon: Strategic Beliefs and Great Power Competition in the Eurasian Rimland, edited by Jervis, Robert and Snyder, Jack, 20–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. “Systems and Interaction Effects.” In Coping with Complexity in the International System, edited by Snyder, Jack and Jervis, Robert, 25–46. Boulder: Westview Press, 1993a.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. “International Primacy: Is the Game Worth the Candle?.” International Security 17 (1993b): 52–67.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. Why Intelligence Fails: Lessons from the Iranian Revolution and the Iraq War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert, Lebow, Richard Ned, and Stein, Janice Gross. Psychology and Deterrence. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Johnson, David. E. Fast Tanks and Heavy Bombers. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Johnson, Dominic D.P. Overconfidence and War: The Havoc and Glory of Positive Illusions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Johnson, Dominic D.P. and Tierney, Dominic. Failing to Win: Perceptions of Victory and Defeat in International Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Johnson, Dominic D.P. and Toft, Monica Duffy. “Grounds for War: The Evolution of Territorial Conflict.” International Security 38 (2013–2014): 7–38.Google Scholar
Jones, Howard. Crucible of Power: A History of American Foreign Relations from 1897, second edition. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2008.Google Scholar
Kagan, Donald. 1995. On the Origins of War and the Preservation of Peace. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, and Tversky, Amos. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Katzenbach, Edward L. Jr. “The Horse Cavalry in the Twentieth Century.” In The Use of Force: International Politics and Foreign Policy, edited by Art, Robert J. and Waltz, Kenneth N., 277–297. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1971 [1958].Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. (ed.). The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Stuart J., Little, Richard, and Wohlforth, William C. (eds.). The Balance of Power in World History. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar
Kennan, George F. American Diplomacy, 1900–1950. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Kennan, George F. “Mr. ‘X’ Reassesses His Brainchild.” In The Evolution of the Cold War, edited by Miller, Richard H., 70–75. Huntington: Robert E. Krieger. Excerpted from Memoirs, 1979 [1967].Google Scholar
Kennedy, Paul M. “The First World War and the International Power System.” International Security 9 (1984): 7–40.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Paul. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. New York: Random House, 1986.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. “Institutional Theory and the Realist Challenge after the Cold War.” In Neo-Realism and Neo-Liberalism, edited by Baldwin, David A., 269–300. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. The Economic Consequences of the Peace. London: Macmillan, 1919.Google Scholar
Khong, Yuen Foong. Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Kier, Elizabeth. “Culture and Military Doctrine: France between the Wars.” International Security 19 (1995): 65–93.Google Scholar
Kier, Elizabeth. Imagining War: French and British Military Doctrine between the Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Kiesling, Eugenia C. Arming against Hitler: France and the Limits of Military Planning. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1996.Google Scholar
Kiesling, Eugenia C. “Resting Uncomfortably on its Laurels: The Army of Interwar France.” In The Challenge of Change: Military Institutions and New Realities, 1918–1941, edited by Winton, Harold R. and Mets, David R., 1–34. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2000.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Kirby, M. and Capey, R.. “The Air Defence of Great Britain, 1920–1940: An Operational Research Perspective.” The Journal of the Operational Research Society 48 (1997): 555–568.Google Scholar
Kissenger, Henry A. Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1957.Google Scholar
Kissenger, Henry A. “American Strategic Doctrine and Diplomacy.” In The Theory and Practice of War, edited by Howard, Michael, 271–292. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Kolko, Gabriel. Anatomy of a War: Vietnam, the United States, and the Modern Historical Experience. New York: New Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Kolko, Joyce and Kolko, Gabriel. The Limits of Power: The World and United States Foreign Policy, 1945–1954. New York: Harper and Row, 1972.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. “Logics of Consequences and Appropriateness in the International System.” In Organizing Political Institutions, edited by Egeberg, Morten and Laegrid, Per, 181–214. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. (ed.). Problematic Sovereignty. New York: Columbia University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Krepinevich, Andrew F. “Cavalry to Computer: The Pattern of Military Revolution.” The National Interest 37 (1994): 30–42.Google Scholar
Kroenig, Matthew. “Nuclear Superiority and the Balance of Resolve: Explaining Nuclear Crisis Outcomes.” International Organization 67 (2013): 141–171.Google Scholar
Krücken, Georg. “Learning the ‘New, New Thing’: On the Role of Path Dependency in University Structures.” Higher Education 46 (2003): 315–339.Google Scholar
Krücken, Georg and Drori, Gili S. (eds.). World Society: The Writings of John Meyer. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Kugler, Jacek, and Lemke, Douglas (eds.). Parity and War: Evaluations and Extensions of “The War Ledger.” Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kull, Steven. Minds at War: Nuclear Reality and the Inner Conflicts of Defense Policymakers. New York: Basic Books, 1988.Google Scholar
Kydd, Andrew. “Which Side Are You On? Bias, Credibility and Mediation.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (2003): 597–611.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. “Escape from the State of Nature: Authority and Hierarchy in World Politics.” International Security 32 (2007): 47–79.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Larson, Deborah Welch. Origins of Containment: A Psychological Explanation. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Larson, Deborah Welch. Anatomy of Mistrust: U.S.-Soviet Relations during the Cold War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Larson, Deborah Welch, Paul, T.V., and Wohlforth, William C.. “Status and World Order.” In Status in World Politics, edited by Paul, T.V., Larson, Deborah Welch, and Wohlforth, William C., 3–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Mark. Assuming the Burden: Europe and the American Commitment to War in Vietnam. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned. A Cultural Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned. Forbidden Fruit: Counterfactuals and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010a.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned. Why Nations Fight: Past and Future Motives for War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010b.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned and Stein, Janice Gross. We All Lost the Cold War. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Lee, Chang Kil and Strang, David. “The International Diffusion of Public-Sector Downsizing: Network Emulation and Theory-Driven Learning.” International Organization 60 (2006): 883–909.Google Scholar
Leffler, Melvyn P. A Preponderance of Power: National Security, the Truman Administration, and the Cold War. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Leffler, Melvyn P. “National Security and US Foreign Policy.” In Origins of the Cold War: An International History, edited by Leffler, Melvyn P. and Painter, David S., 15–52. New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Levering, Ralph B. The Cold War, 1945–1987, second edition. Arlington Heights: Harlan Davidson, 1988.Google Scholar
Levinthal, Daniel A. and March, James G.. “The Myopia of Learning.” Strategic Management Journal 14 (1993): 95–112.Google Scholar
Levite, Ariel E. “Never Say Never Again: Nuclear Reversal Revisited.” In Going Nuclear: Nuclear Proliferation and International Security in the 21st Century, edited by Brown, Michael E., Cote, Owen R. Jr., Lynn-Jones, Sean M. and Miller, Steven E., 297–326. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Levitt, Barbara and March, James G.. “Organizational Learning.” Annual Review of Sociology 14 (1988): 319–338.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. “Misperception and the Causes of War: Theoretical Linkages and Analytical Problems.” World Politics 36 (1983a): 76–99.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. War in the Modern Great Power System, 1495–1975. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1983b.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. “Declining Power and the Preventive Motivation for War.” World Politics 40 (1987): 82–107.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. “Preferences, Constraints, and Choices in July 1914.” International Security 15.3 (1990–1991): 151–186.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. “Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield.” International Organization 48 (1994): 279–312.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. “Preventive War and Democratic Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 52 (2008): 1–24.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. and Vasquez, John A. (eds.). The Outbreak of the First World War: Structure, Politics and Decision-Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. and Thompson, William R.. “Balancing on Land and at Sea: Do States Ally against the Leading Global Power?” International Security 35 (2010a): 7–43.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. and Thompson, William R.. Causes of War. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010b.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. and Thompson, William R.. “The Decline of War? Multiple Trajectories and Diverging Trends.” International Studies Review 15 (2013): 16–24.Google Scholar
Lewis, John Wilson and Xue, Litai. China Builds the Bomb. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Liberman, Peter. “The Rise and Fall of the South African Bomb.” In Going Nuclear: Nuclear Proliferation and International Security in the 21st Century, edited by Brown, Michael E., Cote, Owen R. Jr., Lynn-Jones, Sean M., and Miller, Steven E., 255–296. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Liddell Hart, Basil H. The Real War, 1914–1918. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1930.Google Scholar
Liddell Hart, Basil H. History of the Second World War. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1970.Google Scholar
Lieber, Keir A. War and the Engineers: The Primacy of Politics over Technology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Lieber, Keir A. “The New History of World War I and What It Means for International Relations Theory.” International Security 32.2 (2007): 155–191.Google Scholar
Lieber, Kier A. and Press, Daryl. “The End of MAD? The Nuclear Dimension of U.S. Primacy.” International Security 30 (2006): 7–44.Google Scholar
Lim, Alwyn and Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. “Globalization and Commitment in Corporate Social Responsibility: Cross-National Analyses of Institutional and Political-Economy Effects.” American Sociological Review 77 (2012): 69–98.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. The Cold War: A Study in U.S. Foreign Policy. New York: Harper and Row, 1947.Google Scholar
Logsdon, John M. The Decision to Go to the Moon: Project Apollo and the National Interest. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Lord, Robert Howard. The Origins of the War of 1870. New York: Russell and Russell, 1966.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, Michael and Ventresca, Marc. “The New Structuralism in Organizational Theory.” Organization 10 (2003): 457–480.Google Scholar
Sir Lovell, Bernard. The Origins and International Economics of Space Exploration. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Luard, Evan. The Blunted Sword: The Erosion of Military Power in Modern World Politics. New York: New Amsterdam Books, 1988.Google Scholar
Luvaas, Jay. The Military Legacy of the Civil War: The European Inheritance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Luvaas, Jay. “European Military Thought and Doctrine, 1870–1914.” In The Theory and Practice of War, edited by Howard, Michael, 69–94. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Lyall, Jason and Wilson, Isaiah III. “Rage against the Machines: Explaining Outcomes in Counterinsurgency Wars.” International Organization. 63 (2009): 67–106.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Donald. Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Mahnken, Thomas G. Uncovering Ways of War: U.S. Intelligence and Foreign Military Innovation, 1918–1941. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Mahnken, Thomas G. “Beyond Blitzkrieg: Allied Responses to Combined-Arms Armored Warfare during World War II. In The Diffusion of Military Technology and Ideas, edited by Goldman, Emily O. and Eliason, Leslie C., 243–366. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, Michael. The Nuclear Question: The United States and Nuclear Weapons, 1946–1976. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Maoz, Zeev and Mor, Ben D.. Bound by Struggle: The Strategic Evolution of Enduring International Rivalries. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2002.Google Scholar
March, James G. “The Power of Power.” In Varieties of Political Theory, edited by Easton, David, 39–70. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1966.Google Scholar
March, James G. “Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity, and the Engineering of Choice.” The Bell Journal of Economics 9 (1978): 587–608.Google Scholar
March, James G. “Decisions in Organizations and Theories of Choice.” In Perspectives on Organization Design and Behavior, edited by Van de Ven, Andrew H. and Joyce, William F., 205–244. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1981a.Google Scholar
March, James G. “Footnotes to Organizational Change.” Administrative Science Quarterly 26 (1981b): 563–577.Google Scholar
March, James G. “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning.” Organization Science 2 (1991): 71–87.Google Scholar
March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P.. “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life.” The American Political Science Review 78 (1984):734–749.Google Scholar
March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P.. “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders.” International Organization 52 (1998): 943–969.Google Scholar
March, James G., Sproull, Lee S., and Tamuz, Michal. “Learning from Samples of One or Fewer.” Organization Science 2 (1991): 1–13.Google Scholar
Martel, William C. Victory in War: Foundations of Modern Strategy, revised second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Massie, Robert K. Castles of Steel: Britain, Germany, and the Winning of the Great War at Sea. New York: Random House, 2003.Google Scholar
Matloff, Maurice. 1975. “The American Approach to War, 1919–1945.” In The Theory and Practice of War, edited by Howard, Michael, 213–243. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
May, Ernest R. Imperial Democracy: The Emergence of America as a Great Power. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1961.Google Scholar
May, Ernest R. “The U-Boat Campaign.” In The Use of Force: International Politics and Foreign Policy, edited by Art, Robert J. and Waltz, Kenneth N., 298–315. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1971 [1959].Google Scholar
May, Ernest R. “Lessons” of the Past: The Use and Misuse of History in American Foreign Policy. London: Oxford University Press, 1979 [1973].Google Scholar
May, Ernest R. Strange Victory: Hitler’s Conquest of France. New York: Hill and Wang, 2000.Google Scholar
McDermott, J. “The Revolution in British Military Thinking from the Boer War to the Moroccan Crisis.” In The War Plans of the Great Powers, 1880–1914, edited by Kennedy, Paul M., 99–117. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1979 [1974].Google Scholar
McElwee, William. The Art of War: Waterloo to Mons. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
McKay, Derek and Scott, H.M.. The Rise of the Great Powers, 1648–1815. New York: Longman, 1983.Google Scholar
McKercher, B.J.C. and Legault, Roch. 2001. “Introduction.” In Military Planning and the Origins of the Second World War in Europe, edited by McKercher, B.J.C. and Legault, Roch, 1–10. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
McMeekin, Sean. The Russian Origins of the First World War. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2011.Google Scholar
McNeill, William H. The Pursuit of Power: Technology, Armed Force, and Society since A.D. 1000. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. Liddell Hart and the Weight of History. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 2001.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. “Hitler and the Blitzkrieg Strategy.” In The Use of Force: Military Power in International Politics, edited by Art, Robert J. and Waltz, Kenneth N., 152–166. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2009.Google Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan. Reputation and International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. “The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy.” The Antioch Review 8.2 (1948): 193–210.Google Scholar
Messerschmidt, Manfred. “German Military Effectiveness between 1919 and 1939.” In Military Effectiveness: Volume II: The Interwar Period, edited by Millett, Allan R. and Murray, Williamson, 218–255. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1988.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W. “World Society, Institutional Theories, and the Actor.” Annual Review of Sociology 36 (2010): 1–20.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., Boli, John, and Thomas, George M.. “Ontology and Rationalization in the Western Cultural Account.” In Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society, and the Individual, edited by Thomas, George M., Meyer, John W., Ramirez, Francisco O., and Boli, John, 12–37. Newbury Park: Sage, 1987.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., Boli, John, Thomas, George M., and Ramirez, Francisco O.. “World Society and the Nation-State.” American Journal of Sociology 103 (1997): 144–181.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W. and Jepperson, Ronald L.. “The ‘Actors’ of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency.” Sociological Theory 18 (2000): 100–120.Google Scholar
Miller, Benjamin. States, Nations, and the Great Powers: The Sources of Regional War and Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Miller, Gregory D. The Shadow of the Past: Reputation and Military Alliances Before the First World War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Miller, Richard H. (ed.). Introduction to the Evolution of the Cold War. Huntington: Robert E. Krieger, 1979.Google Scholar
Miller, Steven E. and Lynn-Jones, Sean M.. Preface to Military Strategy and the Origins of the First World War, edited by Miller, Steven E., Lynn-Jones, Sean M., and Van Evera, Stephen, xi–xix. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Millett, Allan and Murray, Williamson (eds.). Military Effectiveness. Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1988.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Allan. Victors and Vanquished: The German Influence on Army and Church in France after 1870. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Mombauer, Annika. The Origins of the First World War: Controversies and Consensus. New York: Longman 2002.Google Scholar
Morris, Charles R. Iron Destinies, Lost Opportunities: The Arms Race between the USA and the USSR, 1945–1987. New York: Harper and Row, 1988.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. Game Theory for Political Scientists. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Morton, Jeffrey S. and Starr, Harvey. “Uncertainty, Change, and War: Power Fluctuations in the Modern Elite Power System.” Journal of Peace Research 38 (2001): 49–66.Google Scholar
Moskos, Charles C. Jr. “The Concept of the Military-Industrial Complex: Radical Critique or Liberal Bogey?” Social Problems 21 (1974): 498–512.Google Scholar
Moul, William. “Power Parity, Preponderance, and War between Great Powers, 1816–1989.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 47 (2003): 468–489.Google Scholar
Mueller, John. Retreat from Doomsday: The Obsolescence of Major War. New York: Basic Books, 1989.Google Scholar
Murray, Williamson. “Armored Warfare: The British, French, and German Experiences.” In Military Innovation in the Interwar Period, edited by Murray, Williamson and Millett, Allan R., 6–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Nenniger, Timothy K. “American Military Effectiveness in the First World War.” In Military Effectiveness: Volume I, The First World War, edited by Millett, Allan R. and Murray, Williamson, 116–156. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1988.Google Scholar
O’Connell, Robert L. Of Arms and Men: A History of War, Weapons, and Aggression. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Ogorkiewicz, Richard M. Armor: A History of Mechanized Forces. New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1960.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Barry. Honor, Symbols, and War. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Barry. 2006. “Nuclear Weapons and National Prestige.” Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 1560.Google Scholar
Organski, A.F.K. and Kugler, Jacek. “The Costs of Major Wars: The Phoenix Factor.” The American Political Science Review 71 (1977): 1347–1366.Google Scholar
Organski, A.F.K. and Kugler, Jacek. The War Ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Orton, J. Douglas and Weick, Karl E.. “Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization.” The Academy of Management Review 15 (1990): 203–223.Google Scholar
Paterson, Thomas G. Soviet-American Confrontation: Postwar Reconstruction and the Origins of the Cold War. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Paterson, Thomas G. On Every Front: The Making and Unmaking of the Cold War. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1992.Google Scholar
Paul, T.V., Larson, Deborah Welch, and Wohlforth, William C. (eds.). Status in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Pernell-Gallagher, Kim. “Learning from Performance: Banks, Collateralized Debt Obligations, and the Credit Crisis.” Social Forces 94.1 (2015): 31–59.Google Scholar
Perrow, Charles. Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay, third edition. New York: Random House, 1986.Google Scholar
Perrow, Charles. The Next Catastrophe: Reducing our Vulnerabilities to Natural, Industrial, and Terrorist Disasters. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined. New York: Viking, 2011.Google Scholar
Poast, Paul. 2013. “Can Issue Linkage Improve Treaty Credibility?” Journal of Conflict Resolution 57 (2013): 739–764.Google Scholar
Podvig, Pavel (ed.). Russian Strategic Nuclear Forces. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Porch, Douglas. The March to the Marne: The French Army 1871–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Posen, Barry R. The Sources of Military Doctrine: France, Britain, and Germany between the World Wars. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Powaski, Ronald E. March to Armageddon: The United States and the Nuclear Arms Race, 1939 to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Powaski, Ronald E. Lightning War: Blitzkrieg in the West, 1940. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons, 2003.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. “Uncertainty, Shifting Power, and Appeasement.” The American Political Science Review 90 (1996): 749–764.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. In the Shadow of Power: States and Strategies in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. “The Inefficient Use of Power: Costly Conflict with Complete Information.” American Political Science Review 98 (2004): 231–241.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. “War as a Commitment Problem.” International Organization 60 (2006): 169–203.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. “Persistent Fighting and Shifting Power.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (2012): 620–637.Google Scholar
Powell, Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul J.. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Press, Daryl G. Calculating Credibility: How Leaders Assess Military Threats. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Quester, George H. Nuclear Diplomacy: The First Twenty-Five Years. New York: Dunellen, 1970.Google Scholar
Quester, George H. The Politics of Nuclear Proliferation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Ramirez, Francisco O. and Boli, John. “The Political Construction of Mass Schooling: European Origins and Worldwide Institutionalization.” Sociology of Education 60 (1987): 2–17.Google Scholar
Ramirez, Francisco O. and Meyer, John W.. “Comparative Education: The Social Construction of the Modern World System.” Annual Review of Sociology 6 (1980): 369–399.Google Scholar
Rasler, Karen A. and Thompson, William R.. War and State Making: The Shaping of the Global Powers. Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1989.Google Scholar
Rasler, Karen A. and Thompson, William R.. The Great Powers and Global Struggle, 1490–1990. Lexington: University of Kentucky, 1994.Google Scholar
Rasler, Karen and Thompson, William R.. “Explaining Rivalry Escalation to War: Space, Position, and Contiguity in the Major Power Subsystem.” International Studies Quarterly 44 (2000): 503–530.Google Scholar
Rasler, Karen and Thompson, William R.. “Strategic Rivalries and Complex Causality in 1914.” In The Outbreak of the First World War: Structure, Politics and Decision-Making, edited by Levy, Jack S. and Vasquez, John A., 65–86. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Rasler, Karen, Thompson, William R., and Ganguly, Sumit. How Rivalries End. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Rathbun, Brian C. “Uncertainty about Uncertainty: Understanding the Multiple Meanings of a Crucial Concept in International Relations Theory.” International Studies Quarterly 51 (2007): 533–557.Google Scholar
Regan, Geoffrey. Someone Had Blundered: A Historical Survey of Military Incompetence. London: B.T. Batsford, 1987.Google Scholar
Reich, Simon and Lebow, Richard Ned. Good-Bye Hegemony! Power and Influence in the Global System. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Reiss, Mitchell. Without the Bomb: The Politics of Nuclear Nonproliferation. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Reiss, Mitchell. Bridled Ambition: Why Countries Constrain Their Nuclear Capabilities. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Reiter, Dan. Crucible of Beliefs: Learning, Alliances, and World Wars. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Reiter, Dan and Meek, Curtis. “Determinants of Military Strategy 1903–1994: A Quantitative Empirical Test.” International Studies Quarterly 43 (1999): 363–387.Google Scholar
Reiter, Dan and Stam, Allen C.. Democracies at War. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Resende-Santos, João. Neorealism, States, and the Modern Mass Army. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Reynolds, David. “The European Dimension of the Cold War.” In Origins of the Cold War: An International History, edited by Leffler, Melvyn P. and Painter, David S., 125–138. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Richard. Arsenals of Folly: The Making of the Nuclear Arms Race. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2007.Google Scholar
Rider, Toby J., Findley, Michael G., and Diehl, Paul. “Just Part of the Game? Arms Races, Rivalry, and War.” Journal of Peace Research 48 (2011): 85–100.Google Scholar
Ritter, Gerhard. The Schlieffen Plan: Critique of a Myth. New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1958.Google Scholar
Roberts, Chalmers M. The Nuclear Years: The Arms Race and Arms Control, 1945–70. New York: Praeger, 1970.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. Economics Rules: The Rights and Wrongs of the Dismal Science. New York: W.W. Norton, 2015.Google Scholar
Rosen, Stephen Peter. Winning the Next War: Innovation and the Modern Military. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Ross, Steven. 2001. “American War Plans.” In Military Planning and the Origins of the Second World War in Europe, edited by McKercher, B.J.C. and Legault, Roch, 145–166. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, Gunther E. 1978. The Art of Warfare in the Age of Napoleon. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Roxborough, Ian. “Organizational Innovation: Lessons from Military Organizations.” Sociological Forum 15 (2000): 367–372.Google Scholar
Sagan, Scott D. “1914 Revisited: Allies, Offense, and Instability.” International Security 11 (1986): 151–175.Google Scholar
Sagan, Scott D. The Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents, and Nuclear Weapons. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Sagan, Scott D. “Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons? Three Models in Search of a Bomb.” International Security 21 (1996–1997): 54–86.Google Scholar
Sagan, Scott D. and Waltz, Kenneth N.. The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate Renewed. New York: Norton, 2002.Google Scholar
Sarkees, Meredith Reid and Wayman, Frank. Resort to War: 1816–2007. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. and Halperin, Morton H.. Strategy and Arms Control. New York: Twentieth Century Fund, 1961.Google Scholar
Scheinman, Lawrence. Atomic Energy Policy in France under the Fourth Republic. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Arthur P. Jr. Chapter 2 in The Origins of the Cold War, by Gardner, Lloyd C., Schlesinger, Arthur Jr. and Morgenthau, Hans J., 41–78. Waltham: Ginn-Blaisdell, 1970 [1967].Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Stephen and Kinzer, Stephen. Bitter Fruit: The Untold Story of the American Coup in Guatemala. Garden City: Anchor, 1982.Google Scholar
Schneiberg, Marc and Soule, Sarah A.. “Institutionalization as a Contested, Multi-Level Process: Rate Regulation in American Fire Insurance.” In Social Movements and Organization Theory, edited by Davis, Jerry, McAdam, Doug, Scott, Dick, and Zald, Mayer, 122–160. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Schofer, Evan, Hironaka, Ann, Frank, David John, and Longhofer, Wesley. “Sociological Institutionalism and World Society.” In The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology, edited by Amenta, Edwin, Nash, Kate, and Scott, Alan, 57–68. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.Google Scholar
Schulzinger, Robert D. U.S. Diplomacy since 1900. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L. Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance of Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Sechser, Todd S. “Goliath’s Curse: Coercive Threats and Asymmetric Power.” International Organization 64 (2010): 627–660.Google Scholar
Sechser, Todd S. and Fuhrmann, Matthew. “Crisis Bargaining and Nuclear Blackmail.” International Organization. 67 (2013): 173–195.Google Scholar
Senese, Paul D. and Vasquez, John A.. The Steps to War: An Empirical Study. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Sharman, Jason. “War, Selection, and Micro-States: Economic and Sociological Perspectives on the International System.” European Journal of International Relations 21 (2015): 194–214.Google Scholar
Shimshoni, Jonathan. “Technology, Military Advantage and World War I: A Case of Military Entrepreneurship.” International Security 15 (1990–1991): 187–215.Google Scholar
Simpson, John. The Independent Nuclear State: The United States, Britain and the Military Atom. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Singer, J. David and Small, Melvin. The Wages of War, 1816–1965. Ann Arbor: Inter-University Consortium for Political Research, 1974.Google Scholar
Siverson, Randolph M. and Ward, Michael D.. “The Long Peace: A Reconsideration.” International Organization 56 (2002): 679–691.Google Scholar
Slantchev, Branislav. “The Principle of Convergence in Wartime Negotiations.” American Political Science Review 47 (2003): 621–632.Google Scholar
Smith, Alastair and Stam, Allan C.. “Bargaining and the Nature of War.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (2004): 783–813.Google Scholar
Smith, Rupert. The Utility of Force: The Art of War in the Modern World. New York: Knopf, 2007.Google Scholar
Smoke, Richard. National Security and the Nuclear Dilemma: An Introduction to the American Experience, second edition. New York: Random House, 1987.Google Scholar
Snyder, Glenn H. Deterrence and Defense: Toward a Theory of National Security. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack. “Civil-Military Relations and the Cult of the Offensive, 1914 and 1984.” International Security 9 (1984a): 108–146.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack. The Ideology of the Offensive: Military Decision Making and the Disasters of 1914. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1984b.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack. Introduction in Dominoes and Bandwagon: Strategic Beliefs and Great Power Competition in the Eurasian Rimland, edited by Jervis, Robert and Snyder, Jack, 3–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991a.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack. Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991b.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack. “Better Now Than Later: The Paradox of 1914 as Everyone’s Favored Year for War.” International Security 39 (2014): 71–94.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack and Jervis, Robert (eds.). Coping with Complexity in the International System. Boulder: Westview Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Solingen, Etel. Nuclear Logics: Contrasting Paths in East Asia and the Middle East. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Solingen, Etel. “The Political Economy of Nuclear Restraint.” In Going Nuclear: Nuclear Proliferation and International Security in the 21st Century, edited by Brown, Michael E., Cote, Owen R. Jr., Lynn-Jones, Sean M., and Miller, Steven E., 36–77. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Soysal, Yasemin Nuhoǧlu. Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1994.Google Scholar
Spector, Ronald. “The Military Effectiveness of the US Armed Forces, 1919–39.” In Military Effectiveness: Volume II: The Interwar Period, edited by Millett, Allan R. and Murray, Williamson, 70–97. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1988.Google Scholar
Steefel, Lawrence D. Bismarck, the Hohenzollern Candidacy, and the Origins of the Franco-German War of 1870. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Stevens, Mitchell L. Creating a Class: College Admissions and the Education of Elites. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Stevenson, David. “Militarization and Diplomacy in Europe before 1914.” International Security 22 (1997): 125–161.Google Scholar
Stoecker, Sally W. Forging Stalin’s Army: Marshal Tukhachevsky and the Politics of Military Innovation. Boulder: Westview Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Strachan, Hew. European Armies and the Conduct of War. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1983.Google Scholar
Strang, David. Learning by Example: Imitation and Innovation at a Global Bank. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Strang, David and Meyer, John W.. “Institutional Conditions for Diffusion.” Theory and Society 22 (1993): 487–511.Google Scholar
Strang, David and Macy, Michael W.. “In Search of Excellence: Fads, Success Stories, and Adaptive Emulation.” The American Journal of Sociology 107 (2001): 147–182.Google Scholar
Strang, David and Soule, Sarah A.. “Diffusion in Organizations and Social Movements: From Hybrid Corn to Poison Pills.” Annual Review of Sociology 24 (1998): 265–290.Google Scholar
Suchman, Mark C. and Eyre, Dana P.. “Military Procurement as Rational Myth: Notes on the Social Construction of Weapons Proliferation.” Sociological Forum 7 (1992): 137–161.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Patricia L. “War Aims and War Outcomes: Why Powerful States Lose Limited Wars.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 (2007): 496–524.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Patricia L. Who Wins: Predicting Strategic Success and Failure in Armed Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Summer, Harry G. Jr. Colonel. On Strategy: A Critical Analysis of the Vietnam War. Novato: Presido Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Swidler, Ann. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review (1986): 273–286.Google Scholar
Swidler, Ann. “What Anchors Cultural Practices.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by Schatzki, Theodore R., Cetina, Karin Knorr, and von Savigny, Eike, 74–92. London: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
Tannenwald, Nina. “The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-Use.” International Organization 53 (1999): 433–468.Google Scholar
Tannenwald, Nina. The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons Since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. War, States and Contention: A Comparative Historical Study. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Taylor, A.J.P. The Struggle for Mastery in Europe, 1848–1918. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Taylor, A.J.P. War by Time-Table: How the First World War Began. London: MacDonald and Company, 1969.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E. “Theory-Driven Reasoning about Plausible Pasts and Probable Futures in World Politics: Are We Prisoners of Our Preconceptions?” American Journal of Political Science 43 (1999): 335–366.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E. and Belkin, Aaron (eds.). Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Thayer, Bradley A. “Humans, Not Angels: Reasons to Doubt the Decline of War Thesis.” International Studies Review 15 (2013): 405–411.Google Scholar
Thompson, William R. (ed.). Great Power Rivalries. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Thompson, William R. “Identifying Rivals and Rivalries in World Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 45 (2001): 557–586.Google Scholar
Thompson, William R. “Status Conflict, Hierarchies, and Interpretation Dilemmas.” In Status in World Politics, edited by Paul, T.V., Larson, Deborah Welch, and Wohlforth, William C., 219–245. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (ed.). The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1992. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1992.Google Scholar
Toft, Monica Duffy. “Indivisible Territory, Geographic Concentration, and Ethnic War.” Security Studies 12 (2002): 82–119.Google Scholar
Toft, Monica Duffy and Imlay, Talbot. “Strategic and Military Planning under the Fog of Peace.” In The Fog of Peace and War Planning: Military and Strategic Planning under Uncertainty, edited by Imlay, Talbot C. and Toft, Monica Duffy, 1–10. London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael. Reputation and International Cooperation: Sovereign Debt across Three Centuries. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, Marc. “The Meaning of Mobilization in 1914.” International Security 15 (1990–1991): 120–150.Google Scholar
Travers, Tim. How the War Was Won: Command and Technology in the British Army on the Western Front, 1917–1918. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
Turner, Leonard C.F. Origins of the First World War. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1970.Google Scholar
Van Creveld, Martin L. Technology and War: From 2000 B.C. to the Present. New York: Free Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Van Creveld, Martin. Nuclear Proliferation and the Future of Conflict. New York: Free Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Van Evera, Stephen L. “The Cult of the Offensive and the Origins of the First World War.” International Security 9 (1984): 58–107.Google Scholar
Van Evera, Stephen. Causes of War: Power and the Roots of Conflict. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Vasquez, John A. The War Puzzle Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Vaughan, Diane. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. Harrison. “Bargaining and War.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (2000): 469–484.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. The Modern World System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. “The Origins of War in Neorealist Theory.” In The Origin and Prevention of Major Wars, edited by Rotberg, Robert I. and Raab, Theodore K., 39–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. “Nuclear Myths and Political Realities.” The American Political Science Review 84 (1990): 731–745.Google Scholar
Wawro, Geoffrey. The Franco-Prussian War: The German Conquest of France in 1870–1871. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Weber, Max with Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus (eds.). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978 [1956].Google Scholar
Weick, Karl E. “Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (1976): 1–19.Google Scholar
Weigley, Russell F. The American Way of War: A History of United States Military Strategy and Policy. New York: Macmillan, 1973.Google Scholar
Weigley, Russell F. The Age of Battles: The Quest for Decisive Warfare from Breitenfeld to Waterloo. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Weisiger, Alex. Logics of War: Explanations for Limited and Unlimited Conflicts. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Weldes, Jutta, Lafffey, Mark, Gusterson, Hugh, and Duvall, Raymond (eds.). Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities and the Production of Danger. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization. 46 (1992): 391–425.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Werner, Suzanne. “Deterring Intervention: The Stakes of War and Third Party Involvement.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (2000): 720–732.Google Scholar
Wetzel, David. A Duel of Giants: Bismarck, Napoleon III, and the Origins of the Franco-Prussian War. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Whelan, Richard. Drawing the Line: The Korean War, 1950–1953. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1990.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin. Power Politics, edited by Bull, Hedley and Holbraad, Carsten. London: Leicester University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Williams, William Appleman. The Tragedy of American Diplomacy. New York: Delta, 1962 [1959].Google Scholar
Williamson, Samuel R. Jr. Austria-Hungary and the Origins of the First World War. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1991.Google Scholar
Wilson, Ward. “The Winning Weapon? Rethinking Nuclear Weapons in Light of Hiroshima.” International Security 31 (2007): 162–179.Google Scholar
Wimmer, Andreas. Waves of War: Nationalism, State Formation, and Ethnic Exclusion in the Modern World. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Wimmer, Andreas and Min, Brian. “From Empire to Nation-State: Explaining Wars in the Modern World, 1816–2001.” American Sociological Review 71 (2006): 867–897.Google Scholar
Wimmer, Andreas and Feinstein, Yuval. “The Rise of the Nation-State across the World, 1816 to 2001.” American Sociological Review 75 (2010): 764–790.Google Scholar
Winton, Harold R. “Tanks, Votes, and Budgets: The Politics of Mechanization and Armored Warfare in Britain, 1919–1939.” In The Challenge of Change: Military Institutions and New Realities, 1918–1941, edited by Winton, Harold R. and Mets, David R., 74–107. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Wohlforth, William C. The Elusive Balance: Power and Perceptions during the Cold War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Wohlforth, William C. “Unipolarity, Status Competition, and Great Power War.” World Politics 61 (2009): 28–57.Google Scholar
Wohlforth, William C. “Status Dilemmas and Interstate Conflict.” In Status in World Politics, edited by Paul, T.V., Larson, Deborah Welch, and Wohlforth, William C., 115–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Thomas W. Soviet Power and Europe 1945–1970. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Wolfers, Arnold. Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Wolford, Scott, Reiter, Dan, and Carrubba, Clifford J.. “Information, Commitment, and War.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 55 (2011): 556–579.Google Scholar
Yergin, Daniel. Shattered Peace: The Origins of the Cold War and the National Security State. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1977.Google Scholar
Zacher, Mark W. “The Territorial Integrity Norm: International Boundaries and the Use of Force.” International Organization 55 (2001): 215–250.Google Scholar
Zaloga, Steven J. The Kremlin’s Nuclear Sword: The Rise and Fall of Russia’s Strategic Nuclear Forces, 1945–2000. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, Maurice. 1974. “Military Spending and Economic Stagnation.” The American Journal of Sociology 79 (1974): 1452–1456.Google Scholar
Zisk, Kimberly Marten. Engaging the Enemy: Organization Theory and Soviet Military Innovation, 1955–1991. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Zook, David H. Jr. and Higham, Robin. A Short History of Warfare. New York: Twayne, 1996.Google Scholar
Zubin, Terence. Inventing the Schlieffen Plan: German War Planning, 1871–1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar