Abramowitz, Alan I. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Abramowitz, Alan I. and Saunders, Kyle L.. 2008. “Is Polarization a Myth?” Journal of Politics 70(2): 542–55.Google Scholar

Abramowitz, Alan I. and Webster, Steven. 2015. “All Politics Is National: The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of U.S. House and Senate Elections in the 21st Century.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Google Scholar

Abramson, Paul R., Aldrich, John H., and Rohde, David W.. 1987. “Progressive Ambition among United States Senators: 1972–1988.” Journal of Politics 49(1): 3–35.Google Scholar

Ahler, Douglas J., Citrin, Jack, and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2016. “Do Open Primaries Improve Representation? An Experimental Test of California's 2012 Top-Two Primary.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 41(2): 237–68.Google Scholar

Aldrich, John H. 1980. Before the Convention: Strategies and Choices in Presidential Nomination Strategies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Party Politics in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Aldrich, John H. 2011. Why Parties? A Second Look. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Aldrich, John H. Andrew Ballard, Joshua Lerner, and Rohde, David. 2015. “Does the Gift Keep On Giving? House Leadership PAC Donations before and after Majority Status.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Google Scholar

Aldrich, John H. and Freeze, Melanie. 2011. “Political Participation, Polarization, and Public Opinion: Activism and the Merging of Partisan and Ideological Polarization.” In Facing the Challenge of Democracy: Explorations in the Analysis of Public Opinion and Political Participation, eds. Sniderman, Paul M. and Highton, Benjamin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Aldrich, John H. and Rohde, David W.. 2001. “The Logic of Conditional Party Government: Revisiting the Electoral Connection.” In Congress Reconsidered, eds. Dodd, Lawrence and Oppenheimer, Bruce. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Aldrich, John H. and Thomsen, Danielle M.. Forthcoming. “Party, Policy, and the Ambition to Run for Higher Office.” Legislative Studies Quarterly.Google Scholar

Alford, John R., Teeters, Holly, Ward, Daniel S., and Wilson, Rick K.. 1994. “Overdraft: The Political Cost of Congressional Malfeasance.” Journal of Politics 56(3): 788–801.Google Scholar

Ansolabehere, Stephen. 2011. “Run for Office.” Boston Review 1 May 2011. http://bostonreview.net/stephen-ansolabehere-run-for-office. Accessed 1 September 2015.Google Scholar

Ansolabehere, Stephen and Gerber, Alan. 1997. “Incumbency Advantage and the Persistence of Legislative Majorities.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22(2): 161–78.Google Scholar

Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, Jr. James M, and Stewart, Charles. 2001. “Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 45(1): 136–159.Google Scholar

Bafumi, Joseph and Herron, Michael C. 2010. “Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and Their Members in Congress.” American Political Science Review 104(3): 519–42.Google Scholar

Banks, Jeffrey S. and Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1989. “Explaining Patterns of Candidate Competition in Congressional Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 33(4): 997–1015.Google Scholar

Barber, Michael J. and McCarty, Nolan. 2015. “Causes and Consequences of Polarization.” In Solutions to Political Polarization in America, ed. Persily, Nathan. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996.” American Journal of Political Science 44(1): 35–50.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Jody C. and Francia, Peter L.. 2010. Conventional Wisdom and American Elections: Exploding Myths, Exploring Misconceptions. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Beckel, Michael. 2010. “Who's Backing the New Top Blue Dogs’ Bark, Bite?” OpenSecrets.org 22 November 2010. https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2010/11/whos-backing-the-new-top-blue-dogs/. Accessed 9 June 2016.Google Scholar

Bipartisan Policy Center. 2014. “Governing in a Polarized Era: A Bipartisan Blueprint to Strengthen Our Democracy.” Report. Washington, DC: Bipartisan Policy Center. http://bipartisanpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/default/files/files/BPC%20CPR%20Governing%20in%20a%20Polarized%20America.pdf.Google Scholar

Black, Gordon S. 1972. “A Theory of Political Ambition: Career Choices and the Role of Structural Incentives.” American Political Science Review 66(1): 144–59.Google Scholar

Bland, Scott. 2014. “Moderate Democrats Are Becoming Extinct.” National Journal 8 January 2014. https://www.nationaljournal.com/s/63880. Accessed 23 March 2014.Google Scholar

Boatright, Robert G. 2013. Getting Primaried: The Changing Politics of Congressional Primary Challenges. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Bond, Jon R., Covington, Cary, and Fleisher, Richard. 1985. “Explaining Challenger Quality in Congressional Elections.” Journal of Politics 47(2): 510–29.Google Scholar

Bonica, Adam. 2010. “Introducing the 112th Congress.” Ideological Cartography 5 November 2012. https://ideologicalcartography.com/2010/11/05/introducing-the-112th-congress/. Accessed 1 December 2012.Google Scholar

Bonica, Adam. 2013. “Ideology and Interests in the Political Marketplace.” American Journal of Political Science 57(2): 294–311.Google Scholar

Bonica, Adam. 2014. “Mapping the Ideological Marketplace.” American Journal of Political Science 58(2): 367–86.Google Scholar

Bonica, Adam. 2015. “Data Science for the People.” In Solutions to Political Polarization in America, ed. Persily, Nathan. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brace, Paul. 1984. “Progressive Ambition in the House: A Probabilistic Approach.” Journal of Politics 46(2): 556–71.Google Scholar

Brace, Paul. 1985. “A Probabilistic Approach to Member Retirement from the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 10(1): 107–24.Google Scholar

Brady, David W., Han, Hahrie, and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2007. “Primary Elections and Candidate Ideology: Out of Step with the Primary Electorate?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32(1): 79–105.Google Scholar

Brodey, Sam. 2015. “How Keith Ellison Made the Congressional Progressive Caucus into a Political Force That Matters.” MinnPost 21 July 2015. https://www.minnpost.com/dc-dispatches/2015/07/how-keith-ellison-made-congressional-progressive-caucus-political-force-matter. Accessed 9 June 2016.Google Scholar

Broockman, David. 2014. “Mobilizing Candidates: Political Actors Strategically Shape the Candidate Pool with Personal Appeals.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 1(2): 104–19.Google Scholar

Bullock, Charles S. 1972. “House Careerists: Changing Patterns of Longevity and Attrition.” American Political Science Review 66(4): 1295–300.Google Scholar

Burden, Barry. 2004. “Candidate Positioning in U.S. Congressional Elections.” British Journal of Political Science 34(2): 211–27.Google Scholar

Burrell, Barbara C. 1994. A Woman's Place Is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, Andrea Louise. 2002. “Self-Interest, Social Security, and the Distinctive Participation Patterns of Senior Citizens.” American Political Science Review 96(3): 565–74.Google Scholar

Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Brady, David W, and Cogan., John F 2002. “Out of Step, out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members’ Voting.” American Political Science Review 96(1): 127–40.Google Scholar

Carmines, Edward G. 2011. “Review Symposium: Class Politics, American Style.” Perspectives on Politics 9(3): 645–7.Google Scholar

Carnes, Nicholas. 2012. Congressional Leadership and Social Status (CLASS) Dataset, v. 1.9 [computer file]. Available from the author, http://nicholas.carnes@duke.edu.Google Scholar

Carnes, Nicholas. 2013. White-Collar Government: The Hidden Role of Class in Economic Policy Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Carroll, Susan J. 2003. “Have Women State Legislators in the United States Become More Conservative? A Comparison of State Legislators in 2001 and 1988.” Atlantis: A Women's Studies Journal 27(2): 128–39.Google Scholar

Carroll, Susan J. and Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2013. More Women Can Run: Gender and Pathways to the State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carson, Jamie L., Crespin, Michael H., Finocchiaro, Charles J., and Rohde, David W.. 2007. “Redistricting and Party Polarization in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Politics Research 35(6): 878–904.Google Scholar

Carson, Jamie L. and Roberts, Jason M.. 2013. Ambition, Competition, and Electoral Reform: The Politics of Congressional Elections Across Time. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP). 2013. Excel spreadsheet of all women who ran for the U.S. House in 2010. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics. Additional data collected by the author.Google Scholar

Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP). 2015. “Women in the U.S. Congress Fact Sheet.” New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics.Google Scholar

Center for Responsive Politics. 2014. Database of new House members. Received 10 February 2014.Google Scholar

Cohen, Marty, Karol, David, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2008. The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations before and after Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Congressional Quarterly. 2014. “CQ Roll Call's Vote Studies – 2013 In Review.” Congressional Quarterly 3 February 2014. http://media.cq.com/votestudies. Accessed September 2015.Google Scholar

Cooperman, Rosalyn and Oppenheimer, Bruce I. 2001. “The Gender Gap in the House of Representatives.” In Congress Reconsidered, 7th ed., eds. Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Cornwell, Susan. 2014. “Michigan Race Highlights Tea Party versus Establishment Struggle.” Reuters 9 March 2014. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-politics-teaparty-idUSBREA280NO20140309. Accessed 23 March 2014.Google Scholar

Costain, Anne. 1992. Inviting Women's Rebellion: A Political Process Interpretation of the Women's Movement. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W. and Katz, Jonathan N.. 1996. “Why Did the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Elections Grow?” American Journal of Political Science 40(2): 478–97.Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crespin, Michael H. and Deitz, Janna L.. 2010. “If You Can't Join ‘Em, Beat ‘Em: The Gender Gap in Individual Donations to Congressional Candidates.” Political Research Quarterly 63(3): 581–93.Google Scholar

Darcy, Robert, Welch, Susan, and Clark, Janet. 1994. Women, Elections, and Representation, 2nd ed. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

DeBonis, Mike and Kane, Paul. 2015. “House Speaker John Boehner to Resign at End of October.” Washington Post 25 September 2015. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2015/09/25/boehner-resigns/?utm_term=.e4cc634d3bd3. Accessed 9 June 2016.Google Scholar

Demirjian, Karoun. 2016. “Senate Votes Down Gun Control Proposals in Wake of Orlando Shootings.” Washington Post 20 June 2016. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/06/20/senate-heads-for-gun-control-showdown-likely-to-go-nowhere/?utm_term=.29028087bd92. Accessed 25 June 2016.Google Scholar

Desilver, Drew. 2013. “Current Congress Is Not the Least Productive in Recent History, but Close.” Pew Research Center 3 September 2013. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/09/03/current-congress-is-not-the-least-productive-in-recent-history-but-close/. Accessed 23 March 2014.Google Scholar

Diaz, Kevin. 2009. “Collin Peterson's Blue Dogs Bark at ‘Public Option.’” Star Tribune 13 September 2009. http://www.startribune.com/collin-peterson-s-blue-dogs-bark-at-public-option/59188657/. Accessed 9 June 2016.Google Scholar

Dodson, Debra L. 2006. The Impact of Women in Congress. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dominguez, Casey. 2011. “Does the Party Matter? Endorsements in Congressional Primaries.” Political Research Quarterly 64(3): 534–44.Google Scholar

Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Dugan, Andrew. 2013. “Most Americans for Raising Minimum Wage.” Gallup 11 November 2013. http://www.gallup.com/poll/165794/americans-raising-minimum-wage.aspx. Accessed 9 June 2016.Google Scholar

(The) Economist. 2016. “The Centre Cannot Hold.” The Economist 16 January 2016. http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21688393-two-moderate-members-congress-explain-why-they-are-leaving-centre-cannot-hold. Accessed 9 June 2016.Google Scholar

Elder, Laurel. 2008. “Whither Republican Women: The Growing Partisan Gap among Women in Congress.” The Forum 6(1): Article 13.Google Scholar

Elder, Laurel. 2012. “The Partisan Gap among Women State Legislators.” Journal of Women, Politics, and Public Policy 33(1): 65–85.Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert S. 1971. “The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections.” Polity 3(3): 395–403.Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert S. and Wright, Jr. Gerald C. 1989. “Voters, Candidates, and Issues in Congressional Elections.” In Congress Reconsidered, 4th ed., eds. Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert S. and Wright, Jr. Gerald C. 2000. “Representation of Constituency Ideology in Congress.” In Continuity and Change in House Elections, eds. Brady, David W., Cogan, John F., and Fiorina, Morris P. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Erskine, Hazel. 1971. “The Polls: Women's Role.” Public Opinion Quarterly 35(2): 275–90.Google Scholar

Evans, C. Lawrence and Oleszek, Walter J.. 1999. “The Strategic Context of Congressional Party Leadership.” Congress and the Presidency 26(1): 1–20.Google Scholar

Evans, Sean F. and Swain, John W.. 2012. “The Impact of Reform on Retirement from the U.S. House of Representatives, 1945–2010.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Google Scholar

Fabian, Jordan. 2010. “House Roll Call on Healthcare Bill: 34 Dems Vote Against.” The Hill 22 March 2010. http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/88211-house-roll-call-on-healthcare-bill-34-dems-vote-against. Accessed May 2016.Google Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1974. Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies. Lexington, MA: Lexington.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P., with Abrams, Samuel J.. 2009. Disconnect: The Breakdown of Representation in American Politics. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel J., and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2006. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson/Longman.Google Scholar

Fleisher, Richard and Bond, John R. 2004. “The Shrinking Middle in the US Congress.” British Journal of Political Science 34(3): 429–51.Google Scholar

Fox, Richard L. 2014. “Congressional Elections: Women's Candidacies and the Road to Gender Parity.” In Gender and Elections, 3rd ed., eds. Carroll, Susan J. and Fox, Richard L.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Frederick, Brian. 2009. “Are Female House Members Still More Liberal in a Polarized Era? The Conditional Nature of the Relationship Between Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Congress and the Presidency 36(2): 181–202.Google Scholar

Freeman, Jo. 1986. “The Political Culture of the Democratic and Republican Parties.” Political Science Quarterly 101(3): 327–56.Google Scholar

Fulton, Sarah A., Maestas, Cherie D., Maisel, L. Sandy, and Stone, Walter J.. 2006. “The Sense of a Woman: Gender, Ambition, and the Decision to Run for Office.” Political Research Quarterly 59(2): 235–48.Google Scholar

Gaddie, Ronald Keith and Bullock, Charles S.. 2000. Elections to Open Seats in the U.S. House: Where the Action Is. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Geer, John. 1988. “Assessing the Representativeness of Electorates in Presidential Primaries.” American Journal of Political Science 32(4): 929–45.Google Scholar

Gerber, Elisabeth R. and Morton, Rebecca B.. 1998. “Primary Election Systems and Representation.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 14(2): 304–24.Google Scholar

Gertzog, Irwin. 1995. Congressional Women: Their Recruitment, Integration, and Behavior, 2nd ed. Westport, CT: Praeger Press.Google Scholar

Goodman, Matt. 2014. “At Planned Parenthood Luncheon, Former GOP Senator Says Partisanship Damages Women's Healthcare.” Dallas/Fort Worth Healthcare Daily 8 April 2014. Accessed 9 June 2016.Google Scholar

Grist. 2006. “An Interview with Retiring Rep. Sherwood Boehlert, a GOP Leader on Environmental Protection.” Grist 29 April 2006. Web. Accessed 9 June 2016.Google Scholar

Grofman, Bernard, Koetzle, William, and McGann, Anthony J.. 2002. “Congressional Leadership 1965–96: A New Look at the Extremism versus Centrality Debate.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27(1): 87–105.Google Scholar

Groseclose, Tim and Krehbiel, Keith. 1994. “Golden Parachutes, Rubber Checks, and Strategic Retirement from the 102nd House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 38(1): 75–99.Google Scholar

Grossman, Matt and Hopkins, David A.. 2015. “Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats: The Asymmetry of American Party Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 13(1): 119–39.Google Scholar

Grossman, Matt and Hopkins, David A. 2016. Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Grynaviski, Jeffrey D. 2010. Partisan Bonds: Political Reputations and Legislative Accountability. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hacker, Jacob S. and Pierson, Paul. 2005. Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Hacker, Jacob S. and Pierson, Paul. 2014. “After the ‘Master Theory’: Downs, Schattschneider, and the Rebirth of Policy-Focused Analysis.” Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 643–62.Google Scholar

Hacker, Jacob S. and Pierson, Paul. 2015. “Confronting Asymmetric Polarization.” In Solutions to Political Polarization in America, ed. Persily, Nathan. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hall, Andrew. 2014. “How the Public Funding of Elections Increases Candidate Polarization.” Working Paper, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Hall, Andrew B. and Snyder, James. 2015. “Candidate Ideology and Electoral Success.” Working Paper, Harvard University.Google Scholar

Hall, Richard L. and Van Houweling, Robert P.. 1995. “Avarice and Ambition in Congress: Representatives’ Decisions to Run or Retire from the U.S. House.” American Political Science Review 89(1): 121–37.Google Scholar

Harris, Douglas B. and Nelson, Garrison. 2008. “Middlemen No More? Emergent Patterns in Congressional Leadership Selection.” PS: Political Science and Politics 41(1): 49–55.Google Scholar

Hawkesworth, Mary, Casey, Kathleen J., Jenkins, Krista, and Kleeman, Katherine E. 2001. Legislating by and for Women: A Comparison of the 103rd and 104th Congresses. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics.Google Scholar

Heberlig, Eric, Hetherington, Marc, and Larson, Bruce. 2006. “The Price of Leadership: Campaign Money and the Polarization of Congressional Parties.” Journal of Politics 68(4): 992–1005.Google Scholar

Herrnson, Paul S. 1986. “Do Parties Make a Difference? The Role of Party Organizations in Congressional Elections.” Journal of Politics 48(3): 589–615.Google Scholar

Herrnson, Paul S. 2004. Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Herrnson, Paul S. 2010. “The Evolution of National Party Organizations.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Parties, eds. Maisel, L. Sandy and Berry, Jeffrey M.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hetherington, Marc J. 2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” American Political Science Review 95(3): 619–31.Google Scholar

Hetherington, Marc J. 2009. “Review Article: Putting Polarization in Perspective.” British Journal of Political Science 39(2): 413–48.Google Scholar

Hibbing, John R. 1982. “Voluntary Retirement from the U.S. House of Representatives: Who Quits?” American Journal of Political Science 26(3): 467–84.Google Scholar

Hibbing, John R. and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 1995. Congress as Public Enemy: Attitudes toward American Political Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hirano, Shigeo, Snyder, Jr. James M, Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Hansen, John Mark. 2010. “Primary Elections and Partisan Polarization in the U.S. Congress.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 5(2): 169–91.Google Scholar

Hirano, Shigeo, Lenz, Gabriel S., Pinkovskiy, Maksim, and Snyder, Jr. James M 2015. “Voter Learning in State Primary Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 91–108.Google Scholar

Hooper, Molly K. 2010. “Bachmann Standing by ‘Gangster Government.’” The Hill 22 April 2010. http://thehill.com/homenews/house/93697-bachmann-standing-by-gangster-gov. Accessed 9 June 2016.Google Scholar

Howard, Christopher. 1997. The Hidden Welfare State: Tax Expenditures and Social Policy in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Huey-Burns, Caitlin and Conroy, Scott. 2013. “Why Would Anyone Run for Congress These Days?” Real Clear Politics 24 October 2013. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/10/24/why_would_anyone_run_for_congress_these_days.html. Accessed March 2014.Google Scholar

Inter-Parliamentary Union. 2016. “Women in National Parliaments, 2016.” http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/world.htm. Accessed November 2016.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 1989. “Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946–1986.” American Political Science Review 83(3): 773–93.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 2000. “Party Polarization in National Politics: The Electoral Connection.” In Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era, eds. Bond, Jon R. and Fleisher, Richard. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 2013. The Politics of Congressional Elections, 8th ed. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 2015. “It's Nothing Personal: The Decline of the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections.” Journal of Politics 77(3): 861–73.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. and Dimock, Michael A.. 1994. “Checking Out: The Effects of Bank Overdrafts on the 1992 House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 38(3): 601–24.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. and Kernell, Samuel. 1983. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections, 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Jamieson, Kathleen Hall and Falk, Erika. 1998. “Civility in the House of Representatives: An Update.” Philadelphia: Annenberg Public Policy Center.Google Scholar

Jenkins, Kent. 1990. “Byron's Credentials on the Line.” Washington Post 5 July 1990. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/1990/07/05/byrons-credentials-on-the-line/43274086-459b-4d2a-b298-512512c760f4/?utm_term=.77f33b0ba23e. Accessed 1 September 2015.Google Scholar

Jessee, Stephen and Malhotra, Neil. 2010. “Are Congressional Leaders Middlepersons or Extremists? Yes.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 35(3): 361–92.Google Scholar

Jones, Jeffrey M. 2016. “Republicans, Democrats Interpret Orlando Incident Differently.” Gallup 17 June 2016. http://www.gallup.com/poll/192842/republicans-democrats-interpret-orlando-incident-differently.aspx. Accessed 20 June 2016.Google Scholar

Kabaservice, Geoffrey. 2012. Rule and Ruin: The Downfall of Moderation and the Destruction of the Republican Party, from Eisenhower to the Tea Party. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kane, Paul. 2014. “Blue Dog Democrats, Whittled Down in Number, are Trying to Regroup.” Washington Post 15 January 2014. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/blue-dog-democrats-whittled-down-in-number-are-trying-to-regroup/2014/01/15/37d4e7e2-7dfd-11e3-95c6-0a7aa80874bc_story.html?utm_term=.79705721c5eb. Accessed May 2016.Google Scholar

Kanthak, Kristin and Woon, Jonathan. 2015. “Women Don't Run? Election Aversion and Candidate Entry.” American Journal of Political Science 59(3): 595–612.Google Scholar

Karol, David. Forthcoming. “Parties and Leaders in American Politics.” In Leadership in American Politics, eds. Jenkins, Jeffery A. and Volden, Craig. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar

Kazee, Thomas. 1994. Who Runs for Congress? Ambition, Context, and Candidate Emergence. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar

Keyes, Scott. 2010. “Report: Meet the 2010 Freshman GOP Class.” Think Progress 3 November 2010. https://thinkprogress.org/report-meet-the-2010-gop-freshman-class-967851ad506d#.4sq9h4h5b. Accessed 23 March 2014.Google Scholar

Kiewiet, D. Roderick and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kiewiet, D. Roderick and Zeng, Langche. 1993. “An Analysis of Congressional Career Decisions: 1947–1986.” American Political Science Review 87(4): 928–41.Google Scholar

Kincaid, Diane. 1978. “Over His Dead Body: A Positive Perspective on Widows in the U.S. Congress.” Western Political Quarterly 31(1): 96–104.Google Scholar

King, David C. and Zeckhauser, Richard J.. 2002. “Punching and Counter-punching in the U.S. Congress: Why Party Leaders Tend to Be Extremists.” Presented at the Conference on Leadership 2002: Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice, The Center for Public Leadership, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Kingdon, John. 1981. Congressmen's Voting Decisions. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Klarner, Carl. 2013. “State Partisan Balance Data, 1937–2011.” http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/20403 IQSS Dataverse Network [Distributor] V1. Accessed January 2013.Google Scholar

Kousser, Thad, Phillips, Justin, and Shor, Boris. Forthcoming. “Reform and Representation: A New Method Applied to Recent Electoral Changes.” Political Science Research and Methods.Google Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1993. “Where's the Party?” British Journal of Political Science 23(2): 235–66.Google Scholar

La Raja, Raymond L. 2010. “Party Nominating Procedures and Recruitment – State and Local Level.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Parties, eds. Maisel, L. Sandy and Berry, Jeffrey M.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

LaHood, Ray, with Mackaman, Frank H.. 2015. Seeking Bipartisanship: My Life in Politics. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.Google Scholar

Lawless, Jennifer L. 2012. Becoming a Candidate: Political Ambition and the Decision to Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lawless, Jennifer L. and Fox, Richard L.. 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lawless, Jennifer L. and Fox, Richard L.. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lawless, Jennifer L. and Pearson, Kathryn. 2008. “The Primary Reason for Women's Underrepresentation? Reevaluating the Conventional Wisdom.” Journal of Politics 70(1): 67–82.Google Scholar

Lawless, Jennifer L. and Theriault, Sean M.. 2005. “Will She Stay or Will She Go? Career Ceilings and Women's Retirement from the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30(4): 581–96.Google Scholar

Layman, Geoffrey C. and Carsey, Thomas M.. 2002. “Party Polarization and ‘Conflict Extension’ in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 46(4): 786–802.Google Scholar

Layman, Geoffrey C., Carsey, Thomas M., Green, John C., Herrera, Richard, and Cooperman, Rosalyn. 2010. “Activists and Conflict Extension in American Party Politics.” American Political Science Review 104(2): 324–46.Google Scholar

Lee, Frances E. 2009. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Levitt, Justin. 2015. “Who Draws the Lines?” All About Redistricting. Web. Accessed 15 September 2015.Google Scholar

Levitt, Steven D. and Wolfram, Catherine D.. 1997. “Decomposing the Sources of Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22(1): 45–60.Google Scholar

Lofgren, Mike. 2011. “Goodbye to All That: Reflections of a GOP Operative Who Left the Cult.” Truthout 3 September 2011. http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/3079:goodbye-to-all-that-reflections-of-a-gop-operative-who-left-the-cult. Accessed September 2015.Google Scholar

Maestas, Cherie D., Fulton, Sarah A., Maisel, L. Sandy, and Stone, Walter J.. 2006. “When to Risk It? Institutions, Ambitions, and the Decision to Run for the U.S. House.” American Political Science Review 100(2): 195–208.Google Scholar

Maestas, Cherie and Stewart, Melissa. 2012. “Recruitment and Candidacy: Ambition, Strategy, and the Choice to Run for Congress.” In New Directions in Congressional Politics, ed. Carson, Jamie L.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Maisel, Sandy and Stone, Walter J. 2014. “Candidate Emergence Revisited: The Lingering Effects of Recruitment, Ambition, and Successful Prospects among House Candidates.” Political Science Quarterly 129(3): 429–47.Google Scholar

Mann, Thomas E. and Ornstein, Norman J.. 2012. It's Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Manning, Jennifer E. and Peterson, R. Eric. 2013. “First Term Members of the House of Representatives and Senate, 64th–113th Congresses.” Report from the Congressional Research Service. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Masket, Seth E. 2009. No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Masket, Seth E. and Miller, Michael G.. 2014. “Does Public Election Funding Create More Extreme Legislators? Evidence from Arizona and Maine.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 15(1): 24–40.Google Scholar

Masket, Seth and Miller, Michael G.. 2015. “Is Public Funding Really Electing Extremists?” Monkey Cage 22 January 2015. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2015/01/22/is-public-funding-really-electing-extremists/?utm_term=.2bdd6bb2f000. Accessed 9 June 2016.Google Scholar

Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

McCarty, Nolan. 2015. “Reducing Polarization by Making Parties Stronger.” In Solutions to Political Polarization in America, ed. Persily, Nathan. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar

McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T, and Rosenthal, Howard. 2009. “Does Gerrymandering Cause Polarization?” American Journal of Political Science 53(3): 666–80.Google Scholar

McGhee, Eric, Masket, Seth, Shor, Boris, Rogers, Steve, and McCarty, Nolan. 2014. “A Primary Cause of Partisanship? Nomination Systems and Legislator Ideology.” American Journal of Political Science 58(2): 337–51.Google Scholar

McIntyre, Joyce K. 2000. “New York State of Mind: After Running Family Business, Amory Houghton Serves as Renegade U.S. Representative.” Harvard Crimson 5 June 2000. http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2000/6/5/new-york-state-of-mind-after/. Accessed 19 June 2013.Google Scholar

Mettler, Suzanne. 2005. Soldiers to Citizens: The G.I. Bill and the Making of the Greatest Generation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mettler, Suzanne. 2011. The Submerged State: How Invisible Government Policies Undermine American Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Meyer, Theodoric. 2016. “Inside the Freedom Caucus’ Growth Plans.” Politico 3 April 2016. http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/freedom-caucus-house-conservatives-221481. Accessed 9 June 2016.Google Scholar

Moore, Michael K. and Hibbing, John R.. 1998. “Situational Dissatisfaction in Congress: Explaining Voluntary Departures.” Journal of Politics 60(4): 1088–1107.Google Scholar

National Conference of State Legislatures. 2013. “Number of State Legislators and Length of Terms (in Years).” http://www.ncsl.org/research/about-statelegislatures/number-of-legislators-and-length-of-terms.aspx. Accessed January 2013.Google Scholar

National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL). 2015. “Overview of State Laws on Public Financing.” http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/public-financing-of-campaigns-overview.aspx#candidates. Accessed January 2015.Google Scholar

Neely, Brett. 2011. “Ellison's Tune-Up of Caucus Could Shift Democratic Party.” MPRnews 5 October 2011. http://www.mprnews.org/story/2011/10/05/ellison-progressive-caucus. Accessed 9 June 2016.Google Scholar

Newport, Frank. 2016. “Americans Favor Idea of Increased Overtime Eligibility.” Gallup 3 June 2016. http://www.gallup.com/poll/192287/americans-favor-idea-increased-overtime-eligibility.aspx. Accessed 9 June 2016.Google Scholar

Newport, Frank and Wilke, Joy. 2013. “Immigration Reform Proposals Garner Broad Support in U.S.” Gallup 19 June 2013. http://www.gallup.com/poll/163169/immigration-reform-proposals-garner-broad-support.aspx. Accessed 23 March 2014.Google Scholar

Niven, David. 1998. “Party Elites and Women Candidates: The Shape of Bias.” Women and Politics 19(2): 57–80.Google Scholar

Norrander, Barbara. 1989. “Ideological Representativeness of Presidential Primary Voters.” American Journal of Political Science 33(3): 570–87.Google Scholar

O'Brien, Cortney. 2015. “‘Disturbed’ by Planned Parenthood Video, House GOP Launch Investigation.” Townhall 15 July 2015. http://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobrien/2015/07/15/house-gop-disturbed-by-planned-parenthood-video-launch-investigation-n2025903. Accessed 9 June 2016.Google Scholar

Ornstein, Norman J., Mann, Thomas E., Malbin, Michael J., Rugg, Andrew, and Wakeman, Raffaela. 2014. Vital Statistics on Congress. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Osborn, Tracy L. 2012. How Women Represent Women: Political Parties, Representation, and Gender in the State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Palmer, Barbara and Simon, Dennis. 2008. Breaking the Political Glass Ceiling: Women and Congressional Elections, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Patterson, Samuel C. 1963. “Legislative Leadership and Political Ideology.” Public Opinion Quarterly 27(3): 399–410.Google Scholar

Pearson, Kathryn. 2015. Party Discipline in the U.S. House of Representatives. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Persily, Nathan. 2015a. Solutions to Political Polarization in America, ed. Persily, Nathan. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Persily, Nathan. 2015b. “Stronger Parties as a Solution to Polarization.” In Solutions to Political Polarization in America, ed. Persily, Nathan. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pew Research Center. 2014. Political Polarization in the American Public. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar

Pildes, Richard H. 2015. “Focus on Political Fragmentation, Not Polarization: Re-empower Party Leadership.” In Solutions to Political Polarization in America, ed. Persily, Nathan. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Polsby, Nelson W. 2004. How Congress Evolves: Social Bases of Institutional Change. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Poole, Keith T. 1998. “Changing Minds? Not in Congress!” GSIA Working Paper 1997–22. Carnegie–Mellon University.Google Scholar

Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. 2007. Ideology and Congress. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Povich, Elaine S. 1993. “GOP House Leader Rep. Michel To Retire: Peoria Lawmaker Known for Conciliatory Style.” Chicago Tribune 5 October 1993. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1993-10-05/news/9310050149_1_michel-veto-strategy-house-floor. Accessed September 2015.Google Scholar

Prior, Markus and Stroud, Natalie Jomini. 2015. “Using Mobilization, Media, and Motivation to Curb Political Polarization.” In Solutions to Political Polarization in America, ed. Persily, Nathan. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Project Vote Smart. 2016. “Candidate Ratings and Endorsements.” Project Vote Smart. http://votesmart.org/officials/NA/C/national-congressional#.WHK3vtw7XV0. Accessed 9 June 2016.Google Scholar

Ramirez, Mark D. 2009. “The Dynamics of Partisan Conflict on Congressional Approval.” American Journal of Political Science 53(3): 681–94.Google Scholar

Riffkin, Rebecca. 2014. “2014 U.S. Approval of Congress Remains Near All-Time Low.” Gallup 30 January 2014. Web. Accessed 23 March 2014.Google Scholar

Ripley, Randall B. 1967. Party Leaders in the House of Representatives. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Roberts, Jason M. and Smith, Steven S.. 2003. “Procedural Contexts, Party Strategy, and Conditional Party Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1971–2000.” American Journal of Political Science 47(2): 305–17.Google Scholar

Rodgers, Bethany. 2012. “Beverly Byron Watches a New Face Enter a Divided House.” The Frederick News-Post 30 December 2012. http://www.fredericknewspost.com/news/beverly-byron-watches-a-new-face-enter-a-divided-house/article_468c1ed2-8c6b-5e81-bac4-d96fe5b5ef53.html. Accessed September 2015.Google Scholar

Rogowski, Jon C. and Langella, Stephanie. 2014. “Primary Systems and Candidate Ideology: Evidence from Federal and State Legislative Elections.” American Politics Research 43(5): 846–71.Google Scholar

Rohde, David W. 1979. “Risk-Bearing and Progressive Ambition: The Case of Members of the United States House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 23(1): 1–26.Google Scholar

Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Rohde, David W. 2016. “Reflections on the Complex Causes and Probable Persistence of Political Polarization in the U.S.” Presented at the Richard Lugar Symposium on Political Polarization, Denison University, Granville, OH.Google Scholar

Rohde, David and Aldrich, John. 2010. “Consequences of Electoral and Institutional Change: The Evolution of Conditional Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives.” In New Directions in American Political Parties, ed. Stonecash, Jeffrey M.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Rohde, David W. and Shepsle, Kenneth A.. 1973. “Democratic Committee Assignments in the House of Representatives: Strategic Aspects of a Social Choice Process.” American Political Science Review 67(3): 889–905.Google Scholar

Rosin, Hanna and Malone, Noreen. 2010. “The Mama Grizzlies You Don't Know.” Slate 12 November 2010. http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2010/11/the_mama_grizzlies_you_dont_know.html. Accessed 23 March 2014.Google Scholar

Rubin, Ruth Bloch. 2013. “Organizing for Insurgency: Intraparty Organization and the Development of the House Insurgency, 1908–1910.” Studies in American Political Development 27(2): 86–110.Google Scholar

Saad, Lydia. 2013. “Gridlock Is Top Reason Americans Are Critical of Congress.” Gallup 12 June 2013. http://www.gallup.com/poll/163031/gridlock-top-reason-americans-critical-congress.aspx. Accessed 23 March 2014.Google Scholar

Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2006. Where Women Run: Gender and Party in the American States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Schattschneider, Elmer E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1966. Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Schoeneman, Brian. 2014. “Why on Earth Would Anybody Ever Want to Run for Office Today?” Bearing Drift: Virginia's Conservative Voice. https://bearingdrift.com/2014/09/11/why-on-earth-would-anybody-ever-run-for-office-today/. Accessed September 2015.Google Scholar

Schreiber, Ronnee. 2012. “Mama Grizzlies Compete for Office.” New Political Science 34(4): 549–63.Google Scholar

Schreiber, Ronnee. 2014. “Conservative Women Candidates.” In Women and Elective Office, 3rd ed., eds. Thomas, Sue and Wilcox, Clyde. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Seitz-Wald, Alex. 2015. “Keith Ellison Hands Bernie Sanders His Second Congressional Endorsement.” MSNBC 12 October 2015. http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/keith-ellison-hands-bernie-sanders-his-second-congressional-endorsment. Accessed 9 June 2016.Google Scholar

Seltzer, Richard A., Newman, Jody, and Leighton, Melissa Voorhees. 1997. Sex as a Political Variable: Women as Candidates and Voters in U.S. Elections. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.Google Scholar

Shames, Shauna. 2017. Out of the Running: Why Millennials Reject Political Careers and Why It Matters. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Sherman, Jake. 2012. “Candice Miller to Lead House Panel.” Politico 30 November 2012. http://www.politico.com/story/2012/11/with-candice-miller-appointment-woman-will-lead-house-committee-after-all-084460. Accessed 9 June 2016.Google Scholar

Shor, Boris and McCarty, Nolan. 2011. “The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 105(3): 530–51.Google Scholar

Sides, John and Vavreck, Lynn. 2013. “On the Representativeness of Primary Electorates.” Presented at the Conference on Political Representation: Fifty Years after Miller and Stokes, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 1995. Legislators, Leaders, and Lawmaking: The U.S. House of Representatives in the Postreform Era. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. 2006. Party Wars: Polarization and the Politics of National Policy Making. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Skocpol, Theda and Williamson, Vanessa. 2011. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Smidt, Corwin D. Forthcoming. “Polarization and the Decline of the American Floating Voter.” American Journal of Political Science.Google Scholar

Smith, Steven S. and Ray, Bruce A.. 1983. “The Impact of Congressional Reform: House Democratic Committee Assignments.” Congress & The Presidency 10(2): 219–40.Google Scholar

Sniderman, Paul M., and Stiglitz, Edward H.. 2012. The Reputational Premium: A Theory of Party Identification and Policy Reasoning. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Snyder, James M. and Ting, Michael M.. 2002. “An Informational Rationale for Political Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 46(1): 90–110.Google Scholar

Sorauf, Frank J. 1980. “Political Parties and Political Action Committees: Two Life Cycles.” Arizona Law Review 22(2): 445–64.Google Scholar

Soss, Joe. 1999. “Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action.” American Political Science Review 93(2): 363–80.Google Scholar

Stimson, James A., MacKuen, Michael B., and Erikson, Robert S.. 1995. Dynamic Representation. American Political Science Review 89(3): 543–65.Google Scholar

Stone, Walter J., and Maisel, L. Sandy. 2003. “The Not-So-Simple Calculus of Winning: Potential U.S. House Candidates’ Nomination and General Election Chances.” Journal of Politics 65(4): 951–977.Google Scholar

Stone, Walter J., Maisel, L. Sandy, and Maestas, Cherie D.. 2004. “Quality Counts: Extending the Strategic Politician Model of Incumbent Deterrence.” American Journal of Political Science 48(3): 479–495.Google Scholar

Stone, Walter J. 2010. 2006 Congressional Election Study. University of California, Davis, CA. (http://electionstudy.ucdavis.edu/)Google Scholar

Stonecash, Jeffrey M., Brewer, Mark D., and Mariani, Mark D.. 2003. Diverging Parties: Social Change, Realignment, and Party Polarization. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Strong, Jonathan. 2013. “The Tuesday Group Still Lives.” National Review 20 June 2013. Web. Accessed 9 June 2016.Google Scholar

Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Swers, Michele L. 2013. Women in the Club: Gender and Policy Making in the Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Swers, Michele L. and Larson, Carin. 2005. “Women in Congress: Do They Act as Advocates for Women's Issues?” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, eds. Thomas, Sue and Wilson, Clyde. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tausanovitch, Chris and Warshaw, Christopher. 2013. “Measuring Constituent Policy Preferences in Congress, State Legislatures, and Cities.” Journal of Politics 75(2): 330–42.Google Scholar

Theriault, Sean M. 2006. “Party Polarization in the U.S. Congress: Member Replacement and Member Adaptation.” Party Politics 12(4): 483–503.Google Scholar

Theriault, Sean M. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Theriault, Sean M. 2013. The Gingrich Senators: The Roots of Partisan Warfare in Congress. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Thomsen, Danielle M. 2014. “Ideological Moderates Won't Run: How Party Fit Matters for Partisan Polarization in Congress.” Journal of Politics 76(3): 786–87.Google Scholar

Thomsen, Danielle M. 2015. “Why So Few (Republican) Women? Explaining the Partisan Imbalance of Women in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 40(2): 295–323.Google Scholar

Wasniewski, Matthew A. 2006. Women in Congress, 1917–2006. Office of History and Preservation, Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives. Prepared under the direction of the Committee on House Administration of the U.S. House of Representatives. House Document 108–223, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Weiner, Rachel. 2016. “Why Emily's List is Spending Big to Defeat a Progressive Democrat.” Washington Post 24 March 2016. Web. Accessed 9 June 2016.Google Scholar

Wolbrecht, Christina. 2000. The Politics of Women's Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Wolbrecht, Christina. 2002. “Female Legislators and the Women's Rights Agenda: From Feminine Mystique to Feminist Era.” In Women Transforming Congress, ed. Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Zwick, Jesse. 2011. “Tuesday Mourning.” New Republic 29 January 2011. https://newrepublic.com/article/82420/tuesday-group-gop. Accessed 23 March 2014.Google Scholar