Cumberland Consensus Working Group. Cheeran, B, Cohen, L, Dobkin, B, Ford, G Greenwood, R, Howard, D, Husain, M, Macleod, M, Nudo, R, Rothwell, J, Rudd, A, Teo, J, Ward, N, Wolf, S. The future of restorative neurosciences in stroke: Driving the translational research pipeline from basic science to rehabilitation of people after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009; 23: 97–107. doi:10.1177/1545968308326636.Google Scholar

Wade, DT, de Jong, BA. Recent advances in rehabilitation. BMJ 2000; 20(320): 1385–8.Google Scholar

World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2001.Google Scholar

Van de Velde, D, Coorevits, P, Sabbe, L, et al. Measuring participation as defined by the World Health Organization in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Psychometric properties of the Ghent Participation Scale. Clin. Rehabil. 2017; 31: 379–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nair, KPS, Wade, DT. Satisfaction of team members with interdisciplinary rehabilitation team meetings. Arch. Phys. Med. and Rehabil. 2003; 84: 1710–13.Google Scholar

Wade, DT. Goal setting in rehabilitation: An overview of what, why and how. Clin. Rehabil. 2009; 23: 291–5.Google Scholar

Coulter, A, Collin, A. Making shared decision making a reality: No decision about me without me. London, UK: Kings Fund, 2011.Google Scholar

Nair, KPS. Life goals: The concept and its relevance to rehabilitation. Clin. Rehabil. 2003; 17: 191–201.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist 1982; 37: 122–47. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scobbie, L, McLean, D, Dixon, D, Duncan, E, Wyke, S. Implementing a framework for goal setting in community based stroke rehabilitation: A process evaluation. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2013; 13: 190. doi:10.1186/1472–6963-13–190.Google Scholar

Locke, EA. Effects of knowledge of results, feedback in relation to standards, and goals on reaction-time performance. Am. J. Psychol. 1968; 81: 566–74.Google Scholar

Locke, EA, Latham, GP. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. Am. Psychol. 2002; 57: 705–17.Google Scholar

Latham, GP, Mitchell, TR, Dossett, DL. Importance of participative goal setting and anticipated rewards on goal difficulty and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 1978; 63: 163–71.Google Scholar

Dachler, HP, Wilpert, B. Conceptual dimensions and boundaries of participation in organizations: A critical evaluation. Adm. Sci. Q. 1978; 23: 1–39.Google Scholar

Tjosvold, D. Effects of shared responsibility and goal interdependence on controversy and decision making between departments. Journal of Social Psychology 1988; 128: 7–18.Google Scholar

Tjosvold, D. Performance appraisal of managers: Goal interdependence, ratings, and outcomes. Journal of Social Psychology 1992; 132: 629–39.Google Scholar

Schut, HA, Stam, HJ. Goals in rehabilitation teamwork. Disabil. Rehabil. 1994; 16: 223–6.Google Scholar

Levack, WM, Weatherall, M, Hay-Smith, EJ, Dean, SG, McPherson, K, Siegert, RJ. Goal setting and strategies to enhance goal pursuit for adults with acquired disability participating in rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015; 20(7): CD009727. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009727.pub2.Google Scholar

Wade, DT. Measurements in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Hobart, J, Cano, S. Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: The role of new psychometric methods. Health Technol. Assess. 2009; 13: 1–177. doi:10.3310/hta13120.Google Scholar

Wade, DT, Collin, C. The Barthel ADL Index: A standard measure of physical disability? Int. Disabil. Stud. 1988; 10: 64–7.Google Scholar

Collin, C, Wade, DT, Davies, S, Horne, V. The Barthel ADL Index: A reliability study. Int. Disabil. Stud. 1988; 10: 61–3.Google Scholar

Hobart, JC, Lamping, DL, Freeman, JA, Langdon, DW, McLellan, DL, Greenwood, RJ,Thompson, AJ. Evidence-based measurement: Which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation? Neurology 2001; 28(57): 639–44.Google Scholar

Bjelland, I, Dahl, AA, Haug, TT, Neckelmann, D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J. Psychosom. Res. 2002 Feb; 52: 69–77.Google Scholar

Cardol, M, de Haan, RJ, de Jong, BA., et al. Psychometric properties of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2001; 82(82): 210–16.Google Scholar

Pomeroy, V, Aglioti, SM, Mark, VW, et al. Neurological principles and rehabilitation of action disorders: Rehabilitation interventions. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2011; 25 (Suppl.): 33S–43S.Google Scholar

Carrasco, DG, Cantalapiedra, JA. Effectiveness of motor imagery or mental practice in functional recovery after stroke: A systematic review. Neurología 2016; 31: 43–52.Google Scholar

Thieme, H, Mehrholz, J, Pohl, M, et al. Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke. Stroke. 2013. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.673087.Google Scholar

Zhang, L, Xing, G, Fan, Y, et al. Short and long term effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper limb motor function after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Rehabil. 2017; 31: 1137–53.Google Scholar

Liao, W, Wu, C, Hsieh, Y, et al. Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation on daily function and real-world arm activity in patients with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Clin. Rehabil. 2012; 26: 111–20.Google Scholar

Langhorne, P, Coupar, F, Pollock, A. Motor recovery after stroke: A systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009; 8: 741–54.Google Scholar

Wattchow, KA, McDonnell, MN, Hillier, SL. Rehabilitation interventions for upper limb function in the first four weeks following stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.014.Google Scholar

Nair, KPS, Taly, AB, Maheshwarappa, BM, Kumar, J, Murali, T, Rao, S Nontraumatic spinal cord lesions: A prospective study of medical complications during in-patient rehabilitation. Spinal Cord. 2005; 43: 558–64.Google Scholar