Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-28T05:39:50.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hieronymus Emser’s Confession

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2021

Edited by
Get access

Summary

Emser's Confession that he was responsible for the title of Luther's Epistle to the King of England, which Luther twisted, but which he1 had thought too kind.

Hieronymus Emser the Elder, priest, wishes the reader health and every blessing.

Dear Christian Reader, Martin Luther has once more issued a shameful little new book, specifically against the title set at the head of his letter to the King of England. For while he has no idea how to rebut the king's solid and well grounded answer to him, nor yet how to apologise for the vices laid to his charge, he picks up on the title and thinks it is easier to deal with goats than with bears or lions. Therefore we fight not like the Andabates, blindly and awkwardly encumbered. He complains especially that he can see how it might happen that, through the aforesaid title, his letter might be interpreted as though he had also recanted his teaching. So I freely admit it in front of everyone, and particularly Luther, that I myself was responsible for the aforesaid title and published it. Nor indeed was it so entirely hidden from Luther as he makes out, for I did it not only in Latin but also in German, and I let it go forth openly in print exactly as it follows here:

The substance of the title

A Letter of Martin Luther's to the King of England, Henry, the eighth of that name, in which he disclaims and begs forgiveness for that with which he had foolishly and rashly injured the said king, with a promise to recant the same.

Here the reader should attend to the little word ‘dasselbig’ (‘the same’), a relative pronoun, which (grammar teaches us) refers to nothing other than what went just before, namely to ‘that with which he had foolishly and rashly injured the king’. Thus I do not say that Luther offers to recant his teaching as well. So his accusation against me is false, and he had no need to write this little book at all except that he sought a pretext for refreshing his lineage with new and unheard of vituperation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Henry VIII and Martin Luther
The Second Controversy, 1525–1527
, pp. 192 - 201
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×