Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T18:54:40.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 3 - A Politics of Kindness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2020

Get access

Summary

To dare to look at the Welfare State through the lens of what we know about kindness requires, of course, strong justification. In short, our argument is that focussing on kinship, expressed through kindness, will both improve health and wellbeing, and make our systems of care more effective and efficient. Some of the evidence for this is found before we even open the door to the consulting room or the hospital, or follow the community nurse or social worker into a person’s home. It relates to the dynamics of kinship at a societal and political level.

Type
Chapter
Information
Intelligent Kindness
Rehabilitating the Welfare State
, pp. 20 - 36
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, P. (2018) Statement on visit to the UK, by Professor Philip Alston, United Nations Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights. Available at: www.ohchr.org/en/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=23881&LangID=E [last accessed 6 August, 2019].Google Scholar
Blanden, J., Gregg, P., and Machin, S. (2005) Intergenerational Mobility in Europe and North America. Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
British Medical Journal (1996) The big idea (Editor’s choice). British Medical Journal, 312, 20 April. Available at: www.bmj.com/content/312/7037/0.full [last accessed 6 August, 2019].Google Scholar
Bosma, H., Marmot, M. G., Hemingway, H., et al (1997) Low job control and risk of coronary heart disease in Whitehall II (prospective cohort) study. British Medical Journal. 314: 558–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bounds, A. (2017) Local government to see 77% cuts by 2020. Financial Times, 4 July, 2017. Available at: www.ft.com/content/9c6b5284-6000-11e7-91a7-502f7ee26895 [last accessed 6 August, 2019].Google Scholar
Browne, J. and Levell, P. (2010) The Distributional Effect of Tax and Benefit Reforms to be introduced between June 2010 and April 2014: A Revised Assessment. Institute for Fiscal Studies.Google Scholar
Christakis, N. A. and Fowler, J. H. (2007) The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England Journal of Medicine. 357: 370–9.Google Scholar
Christakis, N. A. and Fowler, J. H. (2008) The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network over 32 years. New England Journal of Medicine. 358: 2249–58.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2000) The National Health Service Plan. HMSO.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2009) Tackling Health Inequalities: 10 Years On. HMSO.Google Scholar
Donnelly, L. (2018) NHS Crisis fuelled by closure of 1,000 care homes. Daily Telegraph, 13 January, 2018. Available at: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/01/13/nhs-crisis-fuelled-closure-1000-care-homes-housing-30000-pensioners/ [last accessed 6 August, 2019].Google Scholar
Dorling, D. (2018) Peak Inequality: Britain’s Ticking Time Bomb. Policy Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, J. H. and Christakis, N. A. (2009) Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal study of the Framingham Heart Study social network. British Medical Journal. 338: 23–7.Google Scholar
Hertzman, C., Siddiqi, A. A., Hertzman, E., et al (2010) Tackling inequality: get them while they’re young. British Medical Journal. 340: 346–8.Google Scholar
Hills, J. (2010) An Anatomy of Economic Inequality in the UK. National Equality Panel Report. HMSO.Google Scholar
Joseph Rowntree Foundation (2018) Annual Report: UK Poverty 2018. Available at: www.jrf.org.uk/report/uk-poverty-2018 [last accessed 6 August, 2019].Google Scholar
Kawachi, I., Kennedy, B. P., Lochner, K., et al (1997) Social capital, income inequality, and mortality. American Journal of Public Health. 87: 1491–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kondo, N., Sembajwe, G., Kawachi, I., et al (2009) Income inequality, mortality and self-rated health: meta-analysis of multilevel studies. British Medical Journal. 339: b4471.Google Scholar
Lancee, B. and Van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2012) Income inequality and participation: a comparison of 24 European countries. Social Science Research. 41(5): 1166–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Layard, R. (2005) Happiness: Lessons From a New Science. Penguin.Google Scholar
Layte, R. and Whelan, C. (2014) Who feels inferior? A test of the status anxiety hypothesis of social inequalities in health. European Sociological Review. 30: 525–35.Google Scholar
Marmot, M. (2010) Fair Society, Healthy Lives. The Marmot Review. Available at:www.instituteofhealthequity.org/resources-reports/fair-society-healthy-lives-the-marmot-review [last accessed 26 August, 2019].Google Scholar
Marmot, M. (2016) The Health Gap: The Challenge of an Unequal World. Bloomsbury Paperbacks.Google Scholar
May, T. (2016) Statement from the new Prime Minister Theresa May. Available at: www.gov.uk/government/speeches/statement-from-the-new-prime-minister-theresa-may [last accessed 6 August, 2019].Google Scholar
National Centre for Social Research (2010) British Social Attitudes Survey 2010. HMSO.Google Scholar
National Centre for Social Research (2018) British Social Attitudes Survey 2018. HMSO.Google Scholar
Pickett, K. E. and Wilkinson, R. (2009) Greater equality and better health. British Medical Journal. 339: b4320.Google Scholar
Pickett, K. E. and Wilkinson, R. (2015) Income inequality and health: a causal review. Social Science & Medicine. 128: 316–26.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Ruddick, G. (2017) Record number of UK care homes declared insolvent. The Guardian, 5 May, 2017. Available at: www.theguardian.com/society/2017/may/05/social-care-crisis-record-number-of-uk-homes-declared-insolvent [last accessed 20 August, 2019].Google Scholar
Sandel, M. (2009) Reith lectures 2009, lecture 4: ‘Politics of the Common Good’, broadcast 30 June, Radio 4.Google Scholar
Sargent, M. (2010) Why inequality is fatal. Nature. 458: 1109–10.Google Scholar
Saunders, P. (2010) Beware false prophets. Policy Exchange.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. (2004) The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less. HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Smith, M. (2018) A majority of Brits now support increasing income tax to fund the NHS. YouGov (2018). Available at: www.yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2018/07/03/majority-brits-now-support-increasing-income-tax-f) [last accessed 6 August, 2019].Google Scholar
Snowdon, C. (2010) The Spirit Level Delusion: Fact-Checking the Left’s New Theory on Everything. Democracy Institute/Little Dice.Google Scholar
Subramanian, S. V. and Kawachi, I. (2004) Income inequality and health: what we have learned so far? Epidemiologic Review. 26: 7891.Google Scholar
Unwin, J. (2018) Kindness, emotions and human relationships: The blind spot in public policy. Carnegie Trust.Google Scholar
Walberg, P., McKee, M., Shkolnikov, V., et al (1998) Economic change, crime and mortality crisis in Russia: regional analysis. British Medical Journal. 317: 312–18.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. G. (1996) Unhealthy Societies: The Affliction of Inequality. Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. G. and Pickett, K. (2009) The Spirit Level. Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better. Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. G. and Pickett, K. (2018) The Inner Level. Allen Lane.Google Scholar
World Bank (2018) Available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.IMRT.IN [last accessed 6 August, 2019].Google Scholar
World Health Organisation (2008) Commission on Social Determinants of Health (2008) Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Available at: www.who.int/social_determinants/thecommission/finalreport/closethegap_how/en/index1.html [last accessed 20 August, 2019].Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×