Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T10:01:50.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Educational progress for African-Americans and Latinos in the United States from the 1950s to the 1990s: the interaction of ancestry and class

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Michael Hout
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of California at Berkeley
Glenn C. Loury
Affiliation:
Boston University
Tariq Modood
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Steven M. Teles
Affiliation:
Brandeis University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In the 1950s and 1960s the civil rights movement challenged the legal basis of American-style apartheid. Through civil disobedience, litigation, and legislation, activists and movement organizations riveted the nation's attention on the contradiction between Americans' professed belief in equal treatment and the country's history of racial exclusion. The public confrontation between these contradictions caused millions of Americans to rethink their exclusionary views (Schuman et al. 1998). The net result was that African-Americans' access to public education, voting rights, and public places increased. These changes in white people's outlooks and black people's opportunities raised the expectation in the African-American community – and in other quarters, too – that blacks and whites were on the road to equality.

In the 1990s a countermovement pushed back the resources institutions had been using to increase access for African-Americans and people from other formerly excluded racial and ethnic groups. Under the rubric of “no preferences,” critics of affirmative action have used lawsuits, ballot initiatives, and other means to halt or halter the use of race as a criterion when evaluating candidates for education or employment.

Much of the action in the civil rights movement and in the 1990s backlash has been in schools and universities. Civil rights activists and their opponents focus on education because it is the gateway to opportunity. Educational opportunity has been a resource for the propertyless of all ancestries at least since the nineteenth century.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ethnicity, Social Mobility, and Public Policy
Comparing the USA and UK
, pp. 262 - 287
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowen, W. G. and D. Bok, 1998, The Shape of the River: Long-Term Consequences of Considering Race in College and University Admissions, Princeton University Press
Brint, S. and J. Karabel, 1989, The Diverted Dream: Community Colleges and the Promise of Educational Opportunity, New York: Oxford University Press
Card, D. and , A. Krueger, 1992, “School Quality and the Relative Earnings of Blacks and Whites,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 151–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danziger, S. and P. Gottschalk, 1996, America Unequal, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Davis, J. A., T. W. Smith, and P. V. Marsden, 1998, The General Social Survey Cumulative Codebook, 1972–1998, Storrs, CT: Roper Center
Duncan, O. D., 1966, “Methodological Issues in the Analysis of Social Mobility,” in N. J. Smelser and S. M. Lipset (eds.), Social Structure and Mobility in Economic Development, Chicago: Aldine, pp. 51–97
Duncan, O. D. 1969, “Inheritance of Poverty or Inheritance of Race?” in D. P. Moynihan (ed.), On Understanding Poverty, New York: Basic Books, pp. 85–100
Duncan, O. D. 1979, “How Destination Depends on Origin in Social Mobility,” American Journal of Sociology 84: 793–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, R. and J. H. Goldthorpe, 1992, The Constant Flux: Class Mobility in Industrial Societies, Oxford: Clarendon Press
Fischer, C. S., M. Hout, M. S. Jankowski, S. R. Lucas, A. Swidler, and K. Voss, 1996, Inequality by Design: Cracking the Bell Curve Myth, Princeton University Press
Hauser, R. M., 1995, “Trends in College Entry among Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics,” in C. T. Clotfelter and M. Rothschild (eds.), Studies in the Supply and Demand for Higher Education, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 61–120
Hauser, R. M. and Featherman, D. L., 1976, “Equality of Schooling: Trends and Prospects,” Sociology of Education 49: 99–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hout, M. and D. P. Dohan, 1996, “Two Paths to Educational Opportunity: Class and Educational Selection in Sweden and the United States,” in R. Erikson and J. O. Jonsson (eds.), Can Education Be Equalized?, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 207–32
Jaynes, G. D. and R. Williams, 1989, A Common Destiny: Blacks and American Society, Washington, DC: National Academy Press
Kane, T. J., 1999, “Racial and Ethnic Preferences in College Admissions,” in C. Jencks and M. Phillips (eds.), The Black-White Test Score Gap, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, pp. 431–56
Kane, T. J. 2000, The Price of Admission, New York: Brookings Institution
Karen, D., 1991, “The Politics of Race, Class, and Gender: Access to Higher Education in the United States, 1960–1986,” American Journal of Education 99: 208–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, J. S., 1997, Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Lucas, S. R., 1996, “Selective Attrition in a Newly Hostile Regime: The Case of 1980 Sophomores,” Social Forces 75: 999–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mare, R. D., 1995, “Changes in Educational Attainment and School Enrollment,” in R. Farley (ed.), State of the Union, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 155–213
Raftery, A. E. and Hout, M., 1993, “Maximally Maintained Inequality: Expansion, Reform, and Opportunity in Irish Education, 1921–1975,” Sociology of Education 66: 41–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuman, H., C. Steeh, L. Bobo, and M. Krysan, 1998, Racial Attitudes in America: Trends and Interpretations, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
US Bureau of the Census, 1999, “The Changing Shape of the Nation's Income Distribution, 1947–1998,” Current Population Reports: 60–204
US Department of Education, 1997, Digest of Educational Statistics

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×