Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T17:03:22.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Frank Vibert
Frank Vibert
Affiliation:
European Policy Forum, London
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Rise of the Unelected
Democracy and the New Separation of Powers
 , pp. 189 - 197
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, B. 1984. ‘The Storrs Lectures: Discovering the Constitution’, Yale Law Journal, 93 (6): 1013–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibugi, Daniele (ed.) 2003. Debating Cosmopolitics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Argyris, Chris, Putnam, Robert and McClain Smith, Diana (eds.) 1985. Action Science. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Arkes, Hal R. and Hammond, Kenneth R. (eds.) 1986. Judgement and Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1985. ‘The Economics of Agency’, in Pratt, John W. and Zeckhauser, Richard J., Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 37–51.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin R. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Barberis, P. 1998. ‘The New Public Management and a New Accountability’, Public Administration, 76 (3): 451–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael N. and Finnemore, Martha 1999. ‘The Politics, Power and Pathologies of International Organizations’, International Organization, 53: 699–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawm, Kathleen 1995. ‘Political Control versus Expertise: Congressional Choice about Administrative Procedures’, American Political Science Review, 89 (1): 62–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitz, Charles R. 1979. Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bekke, Hans A. G. M., Perry, James L. and Toonen, Theo A. J. (eds.) 1996. Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bergman, Torbjörn, Müller, Wolfgang C. and Strøm, Kaare 2000. ‘Parliamentary Democracy and the Chain of Delegation’, European Journal of Political Research, 37 (3): 255–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaug, M. 1980. The Methodology of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jean, Blondel, Sinnott, Richard and Svensson, Palle 1998. People and Parliament in the European Union: Participation, Democracy and Legitimacy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bodin, Jean 1955 [1576]. Six Books of the Commonwealth (trans. M. J. Tooley). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bohman, James 1996. Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bohman, James and Rehg, William (eds.) 1997. Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1956. The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, John 1999. ‘Accountability and Governance under the New Regulatory State’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 58 (1): 90–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brawley, Mark R. 1993. Liberal Leadership: Great Powers and their Challengers in Peace and War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey and Hamlin, Alan 2000. Democratic Devices and Desires. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey and Hamlin, Alan 2002. ‘Expressive Constitutionalism’, Constitutional Political Economy, 13 (4): 300–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breyer, Stephen G., Stewart, Richard B., Sunstein, Cass R. and Spitzer, Matthew L. 1998. Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy. New York: Aspen Law and Business.Google Scholar
Brione, Paul 2005. ‘Politicians’ Itch to Interfere’, Central Banking, 15 (3): 27–32.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M. 1990. ‘The Domain of Constitutional Economics’, Constitutional Political Economy, 1 (1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Jones, Charles and Little, Richard 1993. The Logic of Anarchy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Calvert, Randall, McCubbins, Mathew D. and Weingast, Barry R. 1989. ‘A Theory of Political Control and Agency Discretion’, American Journal of Political Science, 33 (3): 588–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Robert C. 1985. ‘Agency Costs versus Fiduciary Duties’, in Pratt, John W. and Zeckhauser, Richard J., Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 55–79.Google Scholar
Coen, David and Thatcher, Mark 2005. ‘The New Governance of Markets and Non-Majoritarian Regulators’, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 18 (3): 329–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Jules L. 2001. The Practice of Principle: In Defence of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Conant, Lisa 2002. Justice Contained: Law and Politics in the European Union. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin 2004. Coping with Post Democracy. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1970. After the Revolution? Authority in a Good Society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1998. On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A.1999. ‘Can International Organizations be Democratic? A Skeptic's View’, in Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordon, C. (eds.), Democracy's Edges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell 2004. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell 2006 Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Dehousse, Renaud 1997. ‘Regulation by Networks in the European Community: The Role of European Agencies’, Journal of European Public Policy, 4 (2): 246–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzou, Arthur T. and North, Douglass C. 2000. ‘Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions’, in Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D. and Popkin, Samuel L. (eds.), Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice and the Bounds of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diggins, John Patrick 1994. The Promise of Pragmatism: Modernism and the Crisis of Knowledge and Authority. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary 2002. Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (9th impression 1990).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald 1996. Freedom's Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, RonaldElectoral Commission and Hansard Society 2006. An Audit of Political Engagement 3. Electoral Commission. London.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon 1992. Local Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon(ed.) 1998. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon 1999. Alchemies of the Mind: Rationality and the Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ely, John Hart 1980. Democracy and Distrust. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, David 1999. Delegating Powers: A Transactions Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making under Separate Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, David and O'Halloran, Sharyn 1994. ‘Administrative Procedures, Information and Agency Discretion’, American Journal of Political Science, 38 (3): 697–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, David and O'Halloran, Sharyn 1999. ‘Asymmetric Information, Delegation and the Structure of Policy Making’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11 (1): 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florini, Ann 2003. The Coming Democracy: New Rules for Running a New World. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Froud, Julie and Boden, Rebecca 1998. Controlling the Regulators. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis 1995. Trust: The Social Values and the Creation of Prosperity. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans Georg 1989. 1994 (2nd edn). Truth and Method. New York: Continuum Books.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd 2002. Reckoning with Risk. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gillroy, John Martin and Wade, Maurice (eds.) 1992. The Moral Dimension of Public Policy Choice. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, Eileen 2005. Public Confidence in Official Statistics. ONS Omnibus Survey, Office for National Statistics, London.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin I. 1986. Epistemology and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P. and Shapiro, Ian 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent 2002. ‘Constitutional and Statutory Interpretation’, in Coleman, Jules and Shapiro, Scott (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 268–310.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1989. When Knowledge is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M. 1989. ‘Do Regimes Matter?’ International Organization, 43 (3): 377–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Peter M. 2004. ‘When Does Power Listen to Truth?’ Journal of European Public Policy, 2 (4): 569–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James and Jay, John 1787/8. 1987 (2nd edn ed. Beloff). The Federalist. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hammond, Kenneth R. and Adelman, Leonard 1986. ‘Science, Values and Human Judgement’, in Arkes, Hal R. and Hammond, Kenneth R. (eds.), Judgement and Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 127–43.Google Scholar
Harlow, Carol 2002. Accountability in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, David 2003. ‘Cosmopolitanism: Ideas, Realities and Deficits’, in Held, David and McGrew, Anthony (eds.), Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press, 305–24.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hesse, Mary 1978. ‘Theory and Values in the Social Sciences’, in Hookway, Christopher and Pettit, Philip (eds.), Action and Interpretation: Studies in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–16.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Mark 1994. ‘Normative International Theory: Approaches and Issues’, in Groom, A. J. R. and Light, Margot (eds.), Contemporary International Relations: A Guide to Theory. London: Pinter, 27–44.Google Scholar
Hollis, Martin 1994. The Philosophy of Social Science: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hood, Christopher 1998. The Art of the State. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hood, Christopher 2002. ‘The Risk Game and the Blame Game’, Government and Opposition, 37 (1): 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, Christopher, Rothstein, Henry and Baldwin, Robert 2001. The Government of Risk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, Christopher and Schuppert, Gunnar Folke (eds.) 1988. Delivering Services in Western Europe. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Horn, Murray J. 1995. The Political Economy of Public Administration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House of Lords. Select Committee on the Constitution (2004). The Regulatory State: Ensuring its Accountability. London: The Stationery Office.
Huber, John D. and Pfahler, Madelaine 2001. ‘Legislatures and Statutory Control of Bureaucracy’, American Journal of Political Science, 45 (2): 330–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John D. and Shipan, Charles R. 2000. ‘The Costs of Control: Legislators, Agencies and Transactions Costs’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25 (1): 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John D. and Shipan, Charles R. 2002. Deliberate Discretion: The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Owen 1998. Public Management and Administration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Mark 2002. ‘Decision Theory and Epistemology’, in Moser, Paul K. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 434–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, Hans 1986 [1964]. ‘The Function of a Constitution’ (trans. Stewart), in Tur, R. and Twining, W. (eds.), Essays on Kelsen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 109–19.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. (ed.) 1986. Neorealism and its Critics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O.2002a. ‘Governance in a Partially Globalized World’, in Held, David and McGrew, Anthony (eds.), Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press, 325–47.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 2002b. Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O. 1948. Politics, Parties and Pressure Groups (2nd edn). New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Co.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert and Verba, Sidney 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. W. 1984. 1995 (2nd edn). Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Kolm, Serge-Christophe 1996. Modern Theories of Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith 1998. Pivotal Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna, A. 2002. ‘Enhancing Political Participation in Democracies: What is the Role of Social Capital?’ Comparative Political Studies, 35 (4): 437–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kydland, Finn and Prescott, E. 1977. ‘Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans’, Journal of Political Economy, 85 (3): 473–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Jan Erik 2005. Public Administration and Public Management: The Principal–Agent Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laslett, Peter 2003. ‘Environmental Ethics and the Obsolescence of Existing Political Institutions’, in Fishkin, James S. and Laslett, Peter (eds.), Debating Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Blackwell, 212–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, C. E. 1959. ‘The Science of Muddling Through’, Public Administration Review, 19: 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur and McCubbins, Mathew D. 1998. Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What they Need to Know. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D. and Popkin, Samuel L. (eds.) 2000. Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice and the Bounds of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynn, Laurence E. 1987. Managing Public Policy. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Lynn, Laurence E., Heinrich, Carolyn J. and Hill, Carolyn J. 2001. Improving Governance: A New Logic for Empirical Research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Mair, P. and Biezen, I. 2001. ‘Party Membership in Twenty European Democracies 1980–2000’, Party Politics, 7 (1): 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico 1997. ‘The New European Agencies: Regulation by Information’, Journal of European Public Policy, 4 (2): 262–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico 2001. ‘Two Logics of Delegation: Agency and Fiduciary Relations in EU Governance’, European Union Politics, 2: 103–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico 2005. Dilemmas of Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marin, Bernd and Mayntz, Renate (eds.) 1991. Policy Networks. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Matheson, Alex and Hae-Sang, Kwon 2003. ‘Public Sector Modernisation: A New Agenda’, OECD Journal on Budgeting, 3 (1): 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meersheimer, John 1994/5. ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’, International Security, 19 (3): 5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, Alfred R. 2004. ‘Motivated Irrationality’, in Mele, Alfred R. and Rawling, Piers (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 240–56.
Misztal, Barbara A. 1996. Trust in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Bronwen 2003. ‘The Economization of Politics: Meta-Regulation as a Form of Nonjudicial Legality’, Social and Legal Studies, 12 (4): 489–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, James D. 1994. Games Theory for Political Scientists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa 2002. Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglas C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD 2002. ‘Public Sector Modernisation: A New Agenda’. GOV/PUMA 2002, version 2 (Oct. 2002).
Office of Management and Budget 2004. ‘Progress in Regulatory Reform: 2004 Report to Congress on the Costs and Benefits of Federal Regulations and Unfunded Mandates on State, Local and Tribal Entities’. Washington, DC.
Olsen, J. P. 2001. ‘Garbage Cans, New Institutionalism and the Study of Politics’, American Political Science Review, 95 (1): 191–7.Google Scholar
Osborne, David and Gaebler, Ted 1992. Reinventing Government. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Owens, Susan, Raynor, Tim and Bina, Olivia (2004). ‘New Agendas for Appraisal: Reflections on Theory, Practice and Research’, Environment and Planning, 36: 1943–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Carole 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattie, Charles, Seyd, Patrick and Whiteley, Paul 2004. Citizenship in Britain. Values, Participation and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B. Guy 1996. The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip 2001. A Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip and Smith, Michael 2004. ‘The Truth in Deontology’, in Jay, Wallace R., Pettit, Philip, Scheffler, Samuel and Smith, Michael (eds.), Reason and Value. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 153–75.Google Scholar
Pollack, Mark A. 2003. The Engines of European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher and Bouckaert, Geert 2000. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher and Talbot, Colin (eds.) 2004. Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualisation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher, Talbot, Colin, Caulfield, Janice and Smullen, Amanda. 2004. Agencies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 2003. Law, Pragmatism and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Power, Michael 1997. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Power Inquiry. 2006. The Report of Power: An Independent Inquiry into Britain's Democracy. York: York Publishing Distribution.
Pratt, John W. and Zeckhauser, Richard J. 1985a. ‘Principals and Agents: An Overview’, in Pratt, John W. and Zeckhauser, Richard J. (eds.), Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1–36.Google Scholar
Pratt, John W. and Zeckhauser, Richard J. 1985b. Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary 2002. Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2002. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D., Leonardi, Robert and Nanetti, Rafaella 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John 1999. The Law of the Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reitter, Dan and Stam, Allan C. 2002. Democracies at War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. 1990. ‘Political Science and Rational Choice’, in Alt, James E. and Shepsle, Kenneth A. (eds.), Perspectives on Positive Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 163–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Richard 1986. Giving Direction to Civil Servants: Signals from the Law, Expertise, the Market and the Electorate. Glasgow: Centre for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard2005. Learning from Comparative Public Policy. London: Routledge.
Rousseau, J. J. 1755, 1992. ‘Discourse on Political Economy’, in Masters, Roger D. and Kelly, Christopher (eds.), The Collected Writings of Rousseau, Vol. III. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan 1970. The Philosophy of the Social Sciences. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Alan(ed.) 1973. The Philosophy of Social Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A. (ed.) 1999. Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sayer, Andrew 1984. Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas 1999. ‘Conceptualizing Accountability’, in Schedler, Andreas, Diamond, Larry and Plattner, Marc F. (eds.), The Self-Restraining State. Boulder: Lynn Riesner, 13–28.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas, Diamond, Larry and Marc, Plattner F. (eds.) 1999. The Self-Restraining State. Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Boulder: Lynn Rienner.Google Scholar
Scheufele, D. and Shah, D. 2000. ‘Personality Strength and Social Capital: The Role of Dispositional and Informational Variables in the Production of Civic Participation’, Communication Research, 27: 107–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordon, C. (eds.) 1999a. Democracy's Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordon, C.(eds.) 1999b. Democracy's Edges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelton, Dinah (ed.) 2000. Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1986. ‘Alternative Visions of Rationality’, in Arkes, Hal R. and Hammond, Kenneth R. (eds.), Judgement and Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 97–113.Google Scholar
Skyrmes, Brian 1996. Evolution of the Social Contract. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie 2004. A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Slote, Michael 1989. Beyond Optimizing: A Study in Rational Choice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, Miriam 2001. Social Empiricism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Statistics Commission. 2005. Report No. 24. ‘Official Statistics: Perceptions and Trust’. London.
Steunenberg, Bernard 1996. ‘Agency Discretion, Regulatory Policy Making and Differential Institutional Arrangements’, Public Choice, 86: 309–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2003. ‘Democratizing the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank: Governance and Accountability’, Governance, 16 (1): 111–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strøm, Kaare, Müller, Wolfgang C. and Bergman, Torbjörn (eds.) 2005. Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1996. Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1999. One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thatcher, Mark 1998. ‘The Development of Policy Network Analysis’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10 (4): 389–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thatcher, Mark 2005. ‘The Third Force? Independent Regulatory Agencies and Elected Politicians in Europe’, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 18 (3): 347–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thatcher, Mark and Stone Sweet, Alec 2002. ‘Theory and Practice of Non-Majoritarian Institutions’, West European Politics, 25 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
True, James L., Jones, Bryan D. and Baumgartner, Fred R. 1999. ‘Punctuated Equilibrium Theory’, in Sabatier, Paul A. (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 97–115.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, Richard 1999. The Rights of War and Peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Union of International Associations (ed.) 2004/5. Edition 41. Yearbook of International Organisations, Vol. V. Munich: K. G. Saur.
Vibert, Frank 2001. Europe Simple, Europe Strong. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent 1986. ‘The Politics of Blame Avoidance’, Journal of Public Policy, 6 (4): 371–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, William 1995. Controlling the Bureaucracy: Institutional Constraints in Theory and Practice. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Zakaria, Fareed 2003. The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
Zaring, David 2005. ‘Informal Procedure, Hard and Soft, in International Administration’, Chicago Journal of International Law, 5 (2): 547–603.Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. 1984. ‘The Storrs Lectures: Discovering the Constitution’, Yale Law Journal, 93 (6): 1013–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibugi, Daniele (ed.) 2003. Debating Cosmopolitics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Argyris, Chris, Putnam, Robert and McClain Smith, Diana (eds.) 1985. Action Science. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Arkes, Hal R. and Hammond, Kenneth R. (eds.) 1986. Judgement and Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1985. ‘The Economics of Agency’, in Pratt, John W. and Zeckhauser, Richard J., Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 37–51.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin R. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Barberis, P. 1998. ‘The New Public Management and a New Accountability’, Public Administration, 76 (3): 451–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael N. and Finnemore, Martha 1999. ‘The Politics, Power and Pathologies of International Organizations’, International Organization, 53: 699–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawm, Kathleen 1995. ‘Political Control versus Expertise: Congressional Choice about Administrative Procedures’, American Political Science Review, 89 (1): 62–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitz, Charles R. 1979. Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bekke, Hans A. G. M., Perry, James L. and Toonen, Theo A. J. (eds.) 1996. Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bergman, Torbjörn, Müller, Wolfgang C. and Strøm, Kaare 2000. ‘Parliamentary Democracy and the Chain of Delegation’, European Journal of Political Research, 37 (3): 255–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaug, M. 1980. The Methodology of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jean, Blondel, Sinnott, Richard and Svensson, Palle 1998. People and Parliament in the European Union: Participation, Democracy and Legitimacy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bodin, Jean 1955 [1576]. Six Books of the Commonwealth (trans. M. J. Tooley). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bohman, James 1996. Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bohman, James and Rehg, William (eds.) 1997. Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1956. The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, John 1999. ‘Accountability and Governance under the New Regulatory State’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 58 (1): 90–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brawley, Mark R. 1993. Liberal Leadership: Great Powers and their Challengers in Peace and War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey and Hamlin, Alan 2000. Democratic Devices and Desires. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey and Hamlin, Alan 2002. ‘Expressive Constitutionalism’, Constitutional Political Economy, 13 (4): 300–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breyer, Stephen G., Stewart, Richard B., Sunstein, Cass R. and Spitzer, Matthew L. 1998. Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy. New York: Aspen Law and Business.Google Scholar
Brione, Paul 2005. ‘Politicians’ Itch to Interfere’, Central Banking, 15 (3): 27–32.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M. 1990. ‘The Domain of Constitutional Economics’, Constitutional Political Economy, 1 (1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry, Jones, Charles and Little, Richard 1993. The Logic of Anarchy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Calvert, Randall, McCubbins, Mathew D. and Weingast, Barry R. 1989. ‘A Theory of Political Control and Agency Discretion’, American Journal of Political Science, 33 (3): 588–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Robert C. 1985. ‘Agency Costs versus Fiduciary Duties’, in Pratt, John W. and Zeckhauser, Richard J., Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 55–79.Google Scholar
Coen, David and Thatcher, Mark 2005. ‘The New Governance of Markets and Non-Majoritarian Regulators’, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 18 (3): 329–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Jules L. 2001. The Practice of Principle: In Defence of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Conant, Lisa 2002. Justice Contained: Law and Politics in the European Union. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin 2004. Coping with Post Democracy. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1970. After the Revolution? Authority in a Good Society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1998. On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A.1999. ‘Can International Organizations be Democratic? A Skeptic's View’, in Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordon, C. (eds.), Democracy's Edges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell 2004. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell 2006 Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Dehousse, Renaud 1997. ‘Regulation by Networks in the European Community: The Role of European Agencies’, Journal of European Public Policy, 4 (2): 246–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzou, Arthur T. and North, Douglass C. 2000. ‘Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions’, in Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D. and Popkin, Samuel L. (eds.), Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice and the Bounds of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diggins, John Patrick 1994. The Promise of Pragmatism: Modernism and the Crisis of Knowledge and Authority. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary 2002. Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (9th impression 1990).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald 1996. Freedom's Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, RonaldElectoral Commission and Hansard Society 2006. An Audit of Political Engagement 3. Electoral Commission. London.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon 1992. Local Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon(ed.) 1998. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon 1999. Alchemies of the Mind: Rationality and the Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ely, John Hart 1980. Democracy and Distrust. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, David 1999. Delegating Powers: A Transactions Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making under Separate Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, David and O'Halloran, Sharyn 1994. ‘Administrative Procedures, Information and Agency Discretion’, American Journal of Political Science, 38 (3): 697–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, David and O'Halloran, Sharyn 1999. ‘Asymmetric Information, Delegation and the Structure of Policy Making’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11 (1): 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florini, Ann 2003. The Coming Democracy: New Rules for Running a New World. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Froud, Julie and Boden, Rebecca 1998. Controlling the Regulators. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis 1995. Trust: The Social Values and the Creation of Prosperity. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans Georg 1989. 1994 (2nd edn). Truth and Method. New York: Continuum Books.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, Gerd 2002. Reckoning with Risk. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gillroy, John Martin and Wade, Maurice (eds.) 1992. The Moral Dimension of Public Policy Choice. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, Eileen 2005. Public Confidence in Official Statistics. ONS Omnibus Survey, Office for National Statistics, London.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin I. 1986. Epistemology and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P. and Shapiro, Ian 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent 2002. ‘Constitutional and Statutory Interpretation’, in Coleman, Jules and Shapiro, Scott (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 268–310.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1989. When Knowledge is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M. 1989. ‘Do Regimes Matter?’ International Organization, 43 (3): 377–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Peter M. 2004. ‘When Does Power Listen to Truth?’ Journal of European Public Policy, 2 (4): 569–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James and Jay, John 1787/8. 1987 (2nd edn ed. Beloff). The Federalist. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hammond, Kenneth R. and Adelman, Leonard 1986. ‘Science, Values and Human Judgement’, in Arkes, Hal R. and Hammond, Kenneth R. (eds.), Judgement and Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 127–43.Google Scholar
Harlow, Carol 2002. Accountability in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, David 2003. ‘Cosmopolitanism: Ideas, Realities and Deficits’, in Held, David and McGrew, Anthony (eds.), Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press, 305–24.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hesse, Mary 1978. ‘Theory and Values in the Social Sciences’, in Hookway, Christopher and Pettit, Philip (eds.), Action and Interpretation: Studies in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–16.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Mark 1994. ‘Normative International Theory: Approaches and Issues’, in Groom, A. J. R. and Light, Margot (eds.), Contemporary International Relations: A Guide to Theory. London: Pinter, 27–44.Google Scholar
Hollis, Martin 1994. The Philosophy of Social Science: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hood, Christopher 1998. The Art of the State. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hood, Christopher 2002. ‘The Risk Game and the Blame Game’, Government and Opposition, 37 (1): 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, Christopher, Rothstein, Henry and Baldwin, Robert 2001. The Government of Risk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, Christopher and Schuppert, Gunnar Folke (eds.) 1988. Delivering Services in Western Europe. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Horn, Murray J. 1995. The Political Economy of Public Administration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House of Lords. Select Committee on the Constitution (2004). The Regulatory State: Ensuring its Accountability. London: The Stationery Office.
Huber, John D. and Pfahler, Madelaine 2001. ‘Legislatures and Statutory Control of Bureaucracy’, American Journal of Political Science, 45 (2): 330–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John D. and Shipan, Charles R. 2000. ‘The Costs of Control: Legislators, Agencies and Transactions Costs’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25 (1): 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John D. and Shipan, Charles R. 2002. Deliberate Discretion: The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Owen 1998. Public Management and Administration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Mark 2002. ‘Decision Theory and Epistemology’, in Moser, Paul K. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 434–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, Hans 1986 [1964]. ‘The Function of a Constitution’ (trans. Stewart), in Tur, R. and Twining, W. (eds.), Essays on Kelsen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 109–19.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. (ed.) 1986. Neorealism and its Critics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O.2002a. ‘Governance in a Partially Globalized World’, in Held, David and McGrew, Anthony (eds.), Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press, 325–47.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 2002b. Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O. 1948. Politics, Parties and Pressure Groups (2nd edn). New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Co.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert and Verba, Sidney 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. W. 1984. 1995 (2nd edn). Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Kolm, Serge-Christophe 1996. Modern Theories of Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith 1998. Pivotal Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krishna, A. 2002. ‘Enhancing Political Participation in Democracies: What is the Role of Social Capital?’ Comparative Political Studies, 35 (4): 437–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kydland, Finn and Prescott, E. 1977. ‘Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans’, Journal of Political Economy, 85 (3): 473–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Jan Erik 2005. Public Administration and Public Management: The Principal–Agent Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laslett, Peter 2003. ‘Environmental Ethics and the Obsolescence of Existing Political Institutions’, in Fishkin, James S. and Laslett, Peter (eds.), Debating Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Blackwell, 212–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, C. E. 1959. ‘The Science of Muddling Through’, Public Administration Review, 19: 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur and McCubbins, Mathew D. 1998. Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What they Need to Know. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D. and Popkin, Samuel L. (eds.) 2000. Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice and the Bounds of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynn, Laurence E. 1987. Managing Public Policy. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Lynn, Laurence E., Heinrich, Carolyn J. and Hill, Carolyn J. 2001. Improving Governance: A New Logic for Empirical Research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Mair, P. and Biezen, I. 2001. ‘Party Membership in Twenty European Democracies 1980–2000’, Party Politics, 7 (1): 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico 1997. ‘The New European Agencies: Regulation by Information’, Journal of European Public Policy, 4 (2): 262–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico 2001. ‘Two Logics of Delegation: Agency and Fiduciary Relations in EU Governance’, European Union Politics, 2: 103–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico 2005. Dilemmas of Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marin, Bernd and Mayntz, Renate (eds.) 1991. Policy Networks. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Matheson, Alex and Hae-Sang, Kwon 2003. ‘Public Sector Modernisation: A New Agenda’, OECD Journal on Budgeting, 3 (1): 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meersheimer, John 1994/5. ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’, International Security, 19 (3): 5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, Alfred R. 2004. ‘Motivated Irrationality’, in Mele, Alfred R. and Rawling, Piers (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 240–56.
Misztal, Barbara A. 1996. Trust in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Bronwen 2003. ‘The Economization of Politics: Meta-Regulation as a Form of Nonjudicial Legality’, Social and Legal Studies, 12 (4): 489–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, James D. 1994. Games Theory for Political Scientists. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa 2002. Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglas C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD 2002. ‘Public Sector Modernisation: A New Agenda’. GOV/PUMA 2002, version 2 (Oct. 2002).
Office of Management and Budget 2004. ‘Progress in Regulatory Reform: 2004 Report to Congress on the Costs and Benefits of Federal Regulations and Unfunded Mandates on State, Local and Tribal Entities’. Washington, DC.
Olsen, J. P. 2001. ‘Garbage Cans, New Institutionalism and the Study of Politics’, American Political Science Review, 95 (1): 191–7.Google Scholar
Osborne, David and Gaebler, Ted 1992. Reinventing Government. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Owens, Susan, Raynor, Tim and Bina, Olivia (2004). ‘New Agendas for Appraisal: Reflections on Theory, Practice and Research’, Environment and Planning, 36: 1943–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Carole 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattie, Charles, Seyd, Patrick and Whiteley, Paul 2004. Citizenship in Britain. Values, Participation and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B. Guy 1996. The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip 2001. A Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip and Smith, Michael 2004. ‘The Truth in Deontology’, in Jay, Wallace R., Pettit, Philip, Scheffler, Samuel and Smith, Michael (eds.), Reason and Value. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 153–75.Google Scholar
Pollack, Mark A. 2003. The Engines of European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher and Bouckaert, Geert 2000. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher and Talbot, Colin (eds.) 2004. Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualisation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher, Talbot, Colin, Caulfield, Janice and Smullen, Amanda. 2004. Agencies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 2003. Law, Pragmatism and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Power, Michael 1997. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Power Inquiry. 2006. The Report of Power: An Independent Inquiry into Britain's Democracy. York: York Publishing Distribution.
Pratt, John W. and Zeckhauser, Richard J. 1985a. ‘Principals and Agents: An Overview’, in Pratt, John W. and Zeckhauser, Richard J. (eds.), Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1–36.Google Scholar
Pratt, John W. and Zeckhauser, Richard J. 1985b. Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary 2002. Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2002. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D., Leonardi, Robert and Nanetti, Rafaella 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John 1999. The Law of the Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reitter, Dan and Stam, Allan C. 2002. Democracies at War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. 1990. ‘Political Science and Rational Choice’, in Alt, James E. and Shepsle, Kenneth A. (eds.), Perspectives on Positive Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 163–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Richard 1986. Giving Direction to Civil Servants: Signals from the Law, Expertise, the Market and the Electorate. Glasgow: Centre for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde.Google Scholar
Rose, Richard2005. Learning from Comparative Public Policy. London: Routledge.
Rousseau, J. J. 1755, 1992. ‘Discourse on Political Economy’, in Masters, Roger D. and Kelly, Christopher (eds.), The Collected Writings of Rousseau, Vol. III. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan 1970. The Philosophy of the Social Sciences. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Alan(ed.) 1973. The Philosophy of Social Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A. (ed.) 1999. Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Sayer, Andrew 1984. Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic?Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas 1999. ‘Conceptualizing Accountability’, in Schedler, Andreas, Diamond, Larry and Plattner, Marc F. (eds.), The Self-Restraining State. Boulder: Lynn Riesner, 13–28.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas, Diamond, Larry and Marc, Plattner F. (eds.) 1999. The Self-Restraining State. Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Boulder: Lynn Rienner.Google Scholar
Scheufele, D. and Shah, D. 2000. ‘Personality Strength and Social Capital: The Role of Dispositional and Informational Variables in the Production of Civic Participation’, Communication Research, 27: 107–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordon, C. (eds.) 1999a. Democracy's Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordon, C.(eds.) 1999b. Democracy's Edges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelton, Dinah (ed.) 2000. Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1986. ‘Alternative Visions of Rationality’, in Arkes, Hal R. and Hammond, Kenneth R. (eds.), Judgement and Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 97–113.Google Scholar
Skyrmes, Brian 1996. Evolution of the Social Contract. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie 2004. A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Slote, Michael 1989. Beyond Optimizing: A Study in Rational Choice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, Miriam 2001. Social Empiricism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Statistics Commission. 2005. Report No. 24. ‘Official Statistics: Perceptions and Trust’. London.
Steunenberg, Bernard 1996. ‘Agency Discretion, Regulatory Policy Making and Differential Institutional Arrangements’, Public Choice, 86: 309–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2003. ‘Democratizing the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank: Governance and Accountability’, Governance, 16 (1): 111–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strøm, Kaare, Müller, Wolfgang C. and Bergman, Torbjörn (eds.) 2005. Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1996. Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1999. One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thatcher, Mark 1998. ‘The Development of Policy Network Analysis’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10 (4): 389–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thatcher, Mark 2005. ‘The Third Force? Independent Regulatory Agencies and Elected Politicians in Europe’, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 18 (3): 347–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thatcher, Mark and Stone Sweet, Alec 2002. ‘Theory and Practice of Non-Majoritarian Institutions’, West European Politics, 25 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
True, James L., Jones, Bryan D. and Baumgartner, Fred R. 1999. ‘Punctuated Equilibrium Theory’, in Sabatier, Paul A. (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 97–115.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, Richard 1999. The Rights of War and Peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Union of International Associations (ed.) 2004/5. Edition 41. Yearbook of International Organisations, Vol. V. Munich: K. G. Saur.
Vibert, Frank 2001. Europe Simple, Europe Strong. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent 1986. ‘The Politics of Blame Avoidance’, Journal of Public Policy, 6 (4): 371–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, William 1995. Controlling the Bureaucracy: Institutional Constraints in Theory and Practice. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Zakaria, Fareed 2003. The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad. New York: W.W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
Zaring, David 2005. ‘Informal Procedure, Hard and Soft, in International Administration’, Chicago Journal of International Law, 5 (2): 547–603.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Frank Vibert
  • Book: The Rise of the Unelected
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491160.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Frank Vibert
  • Book: The Rise of the Unelected
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491160.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Frank Vibert
  • Book: The Rise of the Unelected
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491160.014
Available formats
×